Plate Lysate/Platelet Releasate vs PRP Plate Lysate/Platelet Releasate vs PRP in Regenerative Medicine “Blood- in Regenerative Medicine “Blood- derived Growth Factor Concentrates” derived Growth Factor Concentrates” EBM update EBM update Paul S. Lieber, M.D. Paul S. Lieber, M.D. AAOM Annual Conference & Scientific Seminar 2018 AAOM Annual Conference & Scientific Seminar 2018 Clearwater Beach, FL Clearwater Beach, FL
33
Embed
Plate Lysate/Platelet Releasate vs PRP in Regenerative ... · LR vs. LP PRP (Leukocyte Rich vs. Poor)-Knee LR resulted in significant synovial cell death and pro-inflammatory mediators
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Plate Lysate/Platelet Releasate vs PRP Plate Lysate/Platelet Releasate vs PRP in Regenerative Medicine “Blood-in Regenerative Medicine “Blood-
Try to simplify to make Try to simplify to make things teachable and things teachable and understandableunderstandable
You are only going to You are only going to learn a few things from learn a few things from each lecture each lecture
Make it count!Make it count!
KISS PRINCIPLE
20 Minute Lecture20 Minute Lecture
Simple TopicSimple Topic
500 slides500 slides
2 minute lecture 2 minute lecture
18 minutes for Q&A18 minutes for Q&A
Done on timeDone on time
No Problem!No Problem!
PRP HistoryPRP History
Late 90s, use in implant Late 90s, use in implant dentistrydentistryMid 2000s-the beginning Mid 2000s-the beginning of orthopedic useof orthopedic useLate 2000s more wide-Late 2000s more wide-spread adoption as an spread adoption as an orthobiologicorthobiologic
Platelets live in whole blood…Platelets live in whole blood…
The good stuff lives in granules...The good stuff lives in granules...
Platelets have growth Platelets have growth factors inside them…factors inside them…
How platelets augment healing…How platelets augment healing…
Using PRPUsing PRP
Activation?Activation?
Thrombin and CaCl2 will activate Thrombin and CaCl2 will activate plateletsplatelets
Platelets will also be activated by Platelets will also be activated by injecting them into an OA joint or tendoninjecting them into an OA joint or tendon
Hence, it’s unlikely that manual Hence, it’s unlikely that manual activation carries a benefitactivation carries a benefit
Different Preps and Techniques?Different Preps and Techniques?
PreparationPreparation
ClassificationClassification
ActivationActivation
WBCs?WBCs?
RBCs?RBCs?
ConcentrationConcentration
WBCs?WBCs?
No evidence yet for clinical differences in No evidence yet for clinical differences in knee knee OA between LR and LP-OA between LR and LP-Arthroscopy.Arthroscopy. 2016 2016 Mar;32(3):495-505Mar;32(3):495-505Antibacterial effects not related to WBCs (likely Antibacterial effects not related to WBCs (likely cytokines)-cytokines)-BMC Microbiol.BMC Microbiol. 2015 Jul 30;15:149. 2015 Jul 30;15:149.Adverse reactions in knee OA joint injections Adverse reactions in knee OA joint injections directly related to WBC concentration- directly related to WBC concentration- Am J Sports Med.Am J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):792-800. 2016 Mar;44(3):792-800.LR PRP stimulates a pro-inflammatory LR PRP stimulates a pro-inflammatory environment in fibrin scaffolds that hurt environment in fibrin scaffolds that hurt fibroblast and osteoblast proliferation. fibroblast and osteoblast proliferation. PLoS One.PLoS One. 2015 Mar 30;10(3):e0121713. 2015 Mar 30;10(3):e0121713.
LR vs. LP PRP (Leukocyte Rich vs. LR vs. LP PRP (Leukocyte Rich vs. Poor)-KneePoor)-Knee
LR resulted in significant synovial cell LR resulted in significant synovial cell death and pro-inflammatory mediators death and pro-inflammatory mediators in-vitro, whereas LP did not. in-vitro, whereas LP did not. Am J Sports Med.Am J Sports Med. 2014 2014 May;42(5):1204-10.May;42(5):1204-10.LP caused better chondrocyte LP caused better chondrocyte proliferation in-vitro. LP caused anabolic proliferation in-vitro. LP caused anabolic ECM production, LR caused catabolism-ECM production, LR caused catabolism-J Bone Joint Surg Am.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Mar 2014 Mar 5;96(5):423-95;96(5):423-9Knee OA-LP outperformed LR on Knee OA-LP outperformed LR on functional scores-functional scores-Am J Sports Med.Am J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):792-800. 2016 Mar;44(3):792-800.
LP caused less tendon LP caused less tendon inflammation, but similar inflammation, but similar celluarity-animal model-celluarity-animal model-Am J Sports Med.Am J Sports Med. 2012 2012 Jun;40(6):1274-81Jun;40(6):1274-81More on this once we More on this once we review concentrationreview concentration
LR vs. LP PRP (Leukocyte Rich vs. Poor)-TendonLR vs. LP PRP (Leukocyte Rich vs. Poor)-Tendon
MSC Responses MSC Responses to LR vs. LP PRPto LR vs. LP PRP
This information protected by copyright 2016-Regenerative Sciences LLC
RBC-, PRP
No growing MSCsNo growing MSCs
MSCMSCColoniesColonies(CFUs)(CFUs)
MSCMSCColoniesColonies(CFUs)(CFUs)
Representative MSC colonies for CFU counts (inversion microscopy).
RBC+, PRP
RBC-, PL
Thi
s in
form
atio
n pr
ote
cte
d by
cop
yrig
ht
2015
-Re
gen
erat
ive
Sci
ence
s LL
C
The best concentration for tendons?The best concentration for tendons?
Invivo studiesInvivo studies
Animal model of tendon healing-increasing Animal model of tendon healing-increasing platelet concentrations from 2X to 5-7X to 15-platelet concentrations from 2X to 5-7X to 15-20X, with and without WBCs20X, with and without WBCsEven 2X showed good tendon healingEven 2X showed good tendon healingIt was more important to eliminate WBCs than It was more important to eliminate WBCs than to hyper-concentrate tendons (i.e. maximizing to hyper-concentrate tendons (i.e. maximizing platelet to leukocyte ratio was better)platelet to leukocyte ratio was better)There may be a threshold of concentration There may be a threshold of concentration beyond which going higher could reduce beyond which going higher could reduce expression of certain collagen typesexpression of certain collagen typesBoswell, et al-Boswell, et al-Am J Sports Med.Am J Sports Med. 2014 2014 Jan;42(1):42-9.Jan;42(1):42-9.
Many animal models performed in young tissuesMany animal models performed in young tissues
There is likely a plateau effectThere is likely a plateau effect
Our own data has shown that in-vitro work with high platelet Our own data has shown that in-vitro work with high platelet concentrations can negatively impact culture conditions due concentrations can negatively impact culture conditions due to mitochondrial waste productsto mitochondrial waste products
Is there a negative effect of going higher?Is there a negative effect of going higher?
A PRP count of 2B is approximately 7XA PRP count of 2B is approximately 7X
Recommendation-For young tendons, you likely don’t need Recommendation-For young tendons, you likely don’t need more than 2-3X, for older tendons go as high as 5-7X. more than 2-3X, for older tendons go as high as 5-7X. Either way, best to avoid RBCs!Either way, best to avoid RBCs!
6 studies reviewed (n=739, 817 knees, 39% 6 studies reviewed (n=739, 817 knees, 39% males, mean age of 59.9 years, with 38 weeks males, mean age of 59.9 years, with 38 weeks average follow-up)average follow-up)
PRP injection results in significant clinical PRP injection results in significant clinical improvements up to 12 months postinjection. improvements up to 12 months postinjection.
Clinical outcomes and WOMAC scores are Clinical outcomes and WOMAC scores are significantly better after PRP versus HA at 3 to significantly better after PRP versus HA at 3 to 12 months postinjection. 12 months postinjection.
In general, PRP works better In general, PRP works better in less severe OAin less severe OASweet spot seems to be Kl Sweet spot seems to be Kl grade 1-2 (mild to moderate grade 1-2 (mild to moderate OA)OA)Less likely to work in severe Less likely to work in severe OAOA
Hip OAHip OA
N=111 RCT, 3 weekly US guided N=111 RCT, 3 weekly US guided injections of PRP vs. PRP+HA vs. injections of PRP vs. PRP+HA vs. HAHA
LP-PRP-concentrations not listedLP-PRP-concentrations not listed
PRP superior to the other two PRP superior to the other two tested treatmentstested treatments
Am J Sports Med.Am J Sports Med. 2016 2016 Mar;44(3):664-71Mar;44(3):664-71
Best Tendonitis Study to date Best Tendonitis Study to date (lateral epicondylitis):(lateral epicondylitis):
DB multi-center RCTDB multi-center RCT
N=230N=230
LR-PRPLR-PRP
No significant differences were found at No significant differences were found at 12 weeks in this study. At 24 weeks, 12 weeks in this study. At 24 weeks, however, clinically meaningful however, clinically meaningful improvements were found in patients improvements were found in patients treated with leukocyte-enriched PRP treated with leukocyte-enriched PRP compared with an active control group.compared with an active control group.
Lysate vs releasate-what’s the Lysate vs releasate-what’s the diference?diference?
Platelet LysatePlatelet Lysate
Lyse platelets by freezingLyse platelets by freezing
GF Immediately availableGF Immediately available
More advanced techniques leave fewer platelets More advanced techniques leave fewer platelets hanging aroundhanging around
Anti-inflammatoryAnti-inflammatory
Creates Neovasculogenesis around nervesCreates Neovasculogenesis around nerves
A releasate is a growth factor (gf) poor A releasate is a growth factor (gf) poor product…product…
A releasate is created by A releasate is created by overwhelming PRP with CaCl2 or overwhelming PRP with CaCl2 or thrombin to create a clot and thrombin to create a clot and prompt a GF releaseprompt a GF release
Platelets naturally release GFs Platelets naturally release GFs over 7-10 daysover 7-10 days
Hence prompting early release Hence prompting early release only allows a fraction of the total only allows a fraction of the total GF payload to be degranulatedGF payload to be degranulated
perfect for epidural useperfect for epidural use
PL injected epidural using PL injected epidural using fluoroacopically guided fluoroacopically guided transforaminal route or caudaltransforaminal route or caudalSame patient population who Same patient population who would normally benefit from ESI-would normally benefit from ESI-radiculopathy secondary to disc radiculopathy secondary to disc protrusion, extrusion, protrusion, extrusion, sequestration, or stenosissequestration, or stenosis
• Prospective registry data of epidural steroid patients versus platelet lysate epidurals
• Validated Functional Rating Index (FRI) used before and after at 3 and 6 months
• Patient population was lumbar radiculopathy due to HNP, bulge, or stenosis (mixed group)
• Injections were fluoro guided transforaminal and caudal (>90% TF)
• 11 patients crossed over from the ESI to the PL group
• Better FRI scores at 3 and 6 months for the Pl group vs. ESI (p<0.05)
• Cases chosen based on no missing registry data
n 3 month n 6 month
ESI 24 2.41 19 0.58
PL/Dex 60 9.65 48 7.62
SummarySummaryPRP seems to workPRP seems to work
WBCs/RBCs are likely an issue (red WBCs/RBCs are likely an issue (red PRP)PRP)
Going higher on concentration in Going higher on concentration in joints to stimulate local MSCs may joints to stimulate local MSCs may be helpfulbe helpful
Going lower on concentration in Going lower on concentration in tendons may be a good ideatendons may be a good idea
PL is anti-inflammatory and works PL is anti-inflammatory and works for epidurals and hydrodissection of for epidurals and hydrodissection of nervesnerves