PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION of Educational Programmes of Educational Programmes EFFECTIVE MONITORING FRAMEWORK EFFECTIVE MONITORING FRAMEWORK EFFICIENT EDUCATIONAL EFFICIENT EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (EMIS) (EMIS)
28
Embed
PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION of Educational Programmes EFFECTIVE MONITORING FRAMEWORK EFFICIENT EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (EMIS)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
33BACKGROUND DPEP (1994) : MAJOR REFORMS NEEDED GOI, UNICEF & NUEPA JOINED HANDS NUEPA WAS ASSIGNED RESPONSIBILITY: DEVELOP
COMPUTERISED EMIS, SCHOOL AS UNIT OF COLLECTION & DISTRICT UNIT OF DISSEMINATION
PROCESS INITIATED IN 1994-95 IN 7 DPEP STATES EXTENDED TO ENTIRE COUNTRY
SSA 2001 : COVERAGE WAS EXTENDED TO ENTIRE ELEMENTARY LEVEL : MIS UNITS: DISTRICTS/STATES
NO MORE DATA GAPS: EXTENSIVE DATA NOW AVAILABLE ON ALL COMPONENTS OF UEE
TIME-LAG IN DATA COMPLETELY ELIMINATED TWO-WAY INFORMATION FLOW: SCHOOL REPORT CARDS Government REVIEW COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION STATISTICS CONTINUING PROCESS: A FEW CONCERNS ALSO, COVERAGE,
CONSISTENCY, QUALITY, DISSEMINATION & UTILISATION OF DATA
DISE 2005
DISE 2006: HIGHLIGHTS
• SSA: DISE SOFTWARE REVISED IN 2001
• ENTIRE ELEMENTARY LEVEL
• GRADES I TO VII/VIII IRRESPECTIVE OF TYPE OF SCHOOLS
• INDEPENDENT
• INTEGRATED
• ALL RECOGNIZED INSTITUTIONS
• FLEXIBILITY TO ADD STATE-SPECIFIC ADDITIONAL/SUPPLEMENTARY VARIABLES
• REVISED DATABASE PROVIDES IMPROVED PLANNING, MANAGEMENT & MONITORING CAPABILITIES AT DIFFERENT LEVELS
MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS• COULD ABLE TO ESTABLISH COMPUERSIED
EMIS UNITS: DISTRICT & STATE LEVELS• COMPLETLEY ELIMINATED TIME-LAG IN DATA• NO MORE DATA GAPS• TIME-SERIES DATA: SCHOOL, CLUSTER, BLOCK,
DISTRICT, STATE & NATIONAL LEVEL• DISTRICT/STATE/SCHOOL REPORT CARDS• ANALYTICAL REPORT • Elementary Education Plans are based on DISE Data • Random Sample Checking of Data by Independent
Agency in each State• Researcher across the World are using DISE Data
34/35 States Submitted DataTamil Nadu (28.12.2007)HP (31.12.2007)PUNJAB (03.03.2008)Gujarat (07.03.2008)Mizoram (07.03.2008)
HOW IS DISE DIFFERENT?∞ WELL STRUCTURED FORMATS WITH PROVISION OF
SUPPLEMENTARY VARIABLES∞ Thorough Checking of Filled-in Formats∞ NO SCOPE FOR MANUPULATION: FULLY
COMPUTERISED∞ ERROR FREE, TIME TESTED USER FRIEDNLY
SOFTWARE∞ ON LINE HELP∞ LOT OF IN-BUILT CONSISTENCY CHECKS∞ STRONG REPORT & GRAPHICS MODULE∞ INFORMATION FLOW: BOTH WAYS∞ DATA CAN BE EXTRACTED AT ANY LEVEL
∞ NEXT
FOR THE FIRST TIME
• EXTENSIVE DATA ON TEACHERS & PARA TEACHERS
• MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTIONS
• INCENTIVES
• EXAMINATION RESULTS
• NUMBER OF DISABLED CHILDREN STUDYING
EXTENSIVE DATA
SCHOOL LOCATION, MANAGEMENT, RURAL-URBAN, ENROLMENT, BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENTS, INCENTIVES, MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTION, DISABILITIES, EXAMINATION RESULTS, STUDENT FLOWMost of the EFA indicators can be
STATE REPORT CARDS• BASIC DATA: 2001• KEY DATA: ELEMENTARY
EDUCATION• TOTAL SCHOOLS, RURAL
SCHOOLS, TOTAL ENROLMENT, RURAL ENROLMENT, TEACHERS (GOVT. /PVT.)
• RATIO OF P. TO U.P. SCHOOLS/SECTIONS
• PERFORMANCE INDICATORS • ENROLMENT GRADE WISE• REPETITION RATE GRADE WISE• ENROLMENT OF SC/ST• ENROLMENT OF CHILDREN
WITH DISABILITY• TRANSITION RATE P. TO U.P.• GPI PRIMARY GRADES• EXAMINATION RESULTS • INCENTIVES : NUMBER OF
BENEFICIARIES (PREVIOUS ACADEMIC YEAR)
• CLASSROOMS/OTHER ROOM
• NO. OF SCHOOLS BY TYPE OF BUILDING
• POSITION OF TEACHERS BY EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION % TEACHERS TRAINED (IN-SERVICE)
• PARA TEACHERS• % SCHOOLS RECEIVED TLM &
SDGGRANT• TEACHERS BY GENDER AND
CASTE• ENROLMENT BY MEDIUM OF
INSTRUCTIONS• TOTAL GROSSNESS• AVERAGE NO. OF
INSTRUCTIONAL DAYS• AVG. NO. OF DAYS SPENT ON
NON-TEACHING• GER/NER (PRIMARY/U.
PRIMARY)• APPARENT SURVIVAL RATE
RETENTION RATE• % OF TLM & SDG GRANT
UTILIZED
Back
Description
DISTRICT REPORT CARDS• BASIC DATA, 2001• TOTAL SCHOOLS, RURAL
SCHOOLS, TOTAL ENROLMENT, RURAL ENROLMENT, TEACHERS (GOVT. /PVT.)
• PERFORMANCE INDICATORS BY SCHOOL CATEGORY
• ENROLMENT (TIME SERIES) GRADE WISE
• GER/NER• ENROLMENT OF SC/ST• INDICATORS BY SCHOOL
CATEGORY• FLOW RATES (REPETITION
RATE, DROP OUT RATE, PROMOTION RATE)
• ENROLMENT OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITY
• TRANSITION RATE
• COMPLETION RATE• CLASSROOMS: AVERAGE• NO. OF SCHOOLS BY TYPE
OF BUILDING• POSITION OF TEACHERS BY
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION
• EXAMINATION RESULTS • PARA TEACHERS• GENDER AND CASTE
DISTRIBUTION OF TEACHERS
• ENROLMENT BY MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTIONS
• % OF TOTAL GROSSNESS • % SCHOOLS RECEIVED TLM
& SDG GRANT• INCENTIVES: NUMBER OF
BENEFICIARIES: BY TYPE OF INCENTIVES
Continue
A FEW AREAS of CONCERN
AD-HOC ARRANGMENT FOR DISE ACTIVITIES: Project Mode, Multiple Sources, Frequent Changes, Official StatOBTAINING DATA FROM ALL RECONGNISED PRIVATE SCHOOLS NOT a SIMPLE TASKUNRECOGNISED SCHOOLSLACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY/Low PriorityLACK OF DISSEMINATION POLICYDATA UTILIZATION STILL POORSchool IDs