Planning Coordinator Function Task Force Survey Results Doug Tucker Associate Staff Engineer W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.

W E S T E R N E L E C T R I C I T Y C O O R D I N A T I N G C OU N C I L

Planning Coordinator Function Task Force Survey Results

Doug TuckerAssociate Staff Engineer

2

W E S T E R N E L E C T R I C I T Y C O O R D I N A T I N G C OU N C I L

Background

• In November 2013 the System Review Work Group (SRWG) conducted a “Planning Coordinator” survey to identify potential modeling gaps in preparation for MOD-032

• In September 2014 the Planning Coordinator Function Task Force sent out a similar survey– Sent to Primary Compliance and TSS contacts– Identify issues that have been addressed since

SRWG survey was distributed

3

W E S T E R N E L E C T R I C I T Y C O O R D I N A T I N G C OU N C I L

Responses

• 20 Planning Coordinators had changes to their initial SRWG survey response

• 9 Planning Coordinators had no changes to their initial SRWG survey response

• 656 bus changes to the initial SRWG survey responses were identified through the PCFTF survey

4

W E S T E R N E L E C T R I C I T Y C O O R D I N A T I N G C OU N C I L

Changes to the Initial SRWG Survey Responses

PC Area Identified62%

PC Area Removed18%

Bus Owner Changed17%

Bus Number Updates/Misc4%

5

W E S T E R N E L E C T R I C I T Y C O O R D I N A T I N G C OU N C I L

Significate Changes to the Initial SRWG Survey Responses

• WAPA RMR claimed 200 of the 390 Tri-State Buses in the “WAPA RMR” base case area

• LADWP removed buses belonging to the following owners– City of Burbank (17 buses)– City of Glendale (19 buses)

• WAPA UGP added 10 buses

6

W E S T E R N E L E C T R I C I T Y C O O R D I N A T I N G C OU N C I L

Significate Changes from the PCFTF Survey

• BPA included– Jefferson County PUD (12 buses)– Lower Valley Power & Light (22 buses)– Various Generator Owned (72 buses)

• BPA removed– Douglas County PUD (24 buses)

• PSColorado has removed 30 buses

7

W E S T E R N E L E C T R I C I T Y C O O R D I N A T I N G C OU N C I L

PC Area Differences from SRWG Survey

8

W E S T E R N E L E C T R I C I T Y C O O R D I N A T I N G C OU N C I L

Potential Gaps within certain Areas

Generator Owned, 10

Montana Dakota

Utilities; 2

Northwestern; 4

Hill Co Elec; 1

Montana/WAPA UM Area

Generator Owned ; 13

Tri State; 187

West Plains; 75ALT; 5PAC E; 14WAPA LM; 1

Wapa UC; 8

Black Hills; 98

PSCO; 27IM; 20

Platte River; 2

Basin; 41 San Luis Valley; 10

Colorado

Generator Owned; 92

Southwest Trans-mission Coop. , 59

Farming-ton Elec-tric Util-ity, 35

Arizona Area

Generator Owned; 48

City of Centralia; 4Douglas PUD; 24

MFR; 1

OTC Idaho; 2

First Wind; 1

PAC West; 10

Orcas Power;

20

Northwest Area

9

W E S T E R N E L E C T R I C I T Y C O O R D I N A T I N G C OU N C I L

Potential Gaps within certain Areas

Metro W.D.; 33

Redding; 59

Silicon Valley; 46

USBR; 19

Roseville; 26CA-OR Trans; 4

Modesto; 87

NCPA; 23

Calpine; 2

San Francisco; 33

Burbank; 17Glendale; 19

Shasta lake; 1 WAPA SN; 7 TID; 3

California