Top Banner
PLAN 5 : Analyzing and Responding to Data [email protected] om Get Ready : Sit with someone teaching the same content as you this summer. Have your diagnostic data handy. It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data.” - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
34

PLAN 5 : Analyzing and Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

Jan 05, 2016

Download

Documents

khuyen

PLAN 5 : Analyzing and Responding to Data [email protected]. Get Ready :Sit with someone teaching the same content as you this summer. Have your diagnostic data handy. “ It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data.” - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Do Now- 7 min. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

PLAN 5: Analyzing and Responding to Data

[email protected] Ready: Sit with someone teaching the same content as you this summer.

Have your diagnostic data handy.

“It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data.”

- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

Page 2: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

2

Do Now- 7 min.

You have given your diagnostic assessment. Of your 30 students:

20 score below 50%, 7 score between 50%-75%, 3 score above 75%

Do you:

A. Continue with your Unit Plan as written and not re-teach any objectives?

B. Spend a week re-teaching the objectives 7 students did not master?

C. Spend more than a week re-teaching every objective that a student did not master?

D. Some other option altogether? (If you choose this, define your option.)

What advantages do you believe your choice will have for your students?

What disadvantages do you believe your choice will have for your students?

Page 3: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

3

Key Idea

Effective teachers don’t only create plans; they consistently reevaluate those plans based

on their data, and make instructional decisions based

on that analysis.

Page 4: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

4

Objectives

CMWBAT:

1) Analyze their diagnostic data in order to plan effective instructional responses.

Page 5: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

5

Related Rubric Actions

E-6: Evaluates and keeps track of students’ performance on assessments so that the teacher

and students are aware of students’ progress on academic, behavioral, and investment goals.

C-1: Gauges progress and notable gap(s) between student achievement and big goals by

examining assessment data.

Note: You are not scored on these rows at institute. However, this skill of analyzing and responding to data is critical to the success

of summer school students.

Page 6: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

6

Output

Moving Forward:

CM’s will answer analysis questions about their diagnostic data for continued use in a follow-up CMA session designed to allow them to plan a response to this data analysis.

Page 7: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

Question Based Agenda

Do Now How do I choose a plan of action?

Intro/ Opening What’s the Big Picture?

Intro to New Material

How do I collect data?

How should I analyze data?

How should I respond to data?

CS Modeling What does this look like in practice?

CM Practice How does it work for my class?

Closing What next steps am I taking?

7

Page 8: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

8

Do Now Debrief

It is my responsibility to address my students’ missing

knowledge and skills while still keeping the class on pace to

meet our larger goals.

Which option did you choose? What advantages and disadvantages were there? Was this a difficult choice? Were you too paralyzed to even make a choice? What other information did you want?

Page 9: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

9

Types of Assessments (review from PLAN 2)

SUMMATIVE

FORMATIVE

DIAGNOSTIC

WHAT WHEN WHY EXAMPLES

formal measurement of growth and

mastery

at the end of a set of lessons

to evaluate and track growth

and mastery ; to evaluate

efficacy of lessons

unit assessments ;

mid-terms ; year-end tests

gauge of progress toward

mastery of assessment

throughout lesson cycle –

particularly during

Independent Practice

to inform your instruction,

enabling you to make data-

based decisions

quizzes ; practice sets ;

exit tickets

formal measurement

of readiness on skills

foundational to your content

prior to instruction at

the start of the year or on a

particular unit

to make decisions about

grouping, remedial

instruction, etc.

DRA ; WRAP ; QSI ; math

assessment for Chemistry students

Page 10: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

10

What Information Can All Assessments Provide?

Type of Information Extended Description

Overall Class Average

Class Avg. on Specific Obj.

Indiv. Students’ Overall Scores

Indiv. Students’ Scores on Particular Obj.

Trends Among Obj.

broad snapshot view of whole class performance on entire assessment

indicates which obj. majority of students mastered and which obj. students struggled with

clear sense of how individual student performed on an entire assessment

indicates which students need remediation on which objectives

helps you think about how particular objectives might have influenced others

Page 11: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

11

The Tracking Tool

Your TRACKING TOOL will help you manipulate all this information…

BUT

Just as a won’t build a ,

your tracking tool won’t ANALYZE your data!!!

Page 12: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

12

Key Ideas

It is my responsibility to adjust my instruction if I have evidence that my students aren’t

learning.

and

My instruction must be informed by the ANALYSIS of data.

Page 13: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

13

Purpose for Analyzing Data- Handout 1- (pg. 393)

Effective teachers analyze data in order to determine and confirm the following for the whole class, groups of students, and individual students:

• what to TEACH

• what to REMEDIATE

• what to ENRICH

Page 14: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

14

Questions in Data Analysis

When looking at assessment data, you need to look for the following pieces of information:

• What are the class’ STRENGTHS?

• What are the class’ WEAKNESSES?

• What TRENDS do I see among objectives?

• How might I GROUP students according to their relative mastery levels?

Page 15: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

15

Post-Analysis Questions

After analyzing my data, I must:

• Determine the amount of flexibility I have in adjusting my unit plan.

• Possible: Remove objectives which have been mastered by the whole class.

• Definite: Consider if any pre-requisite skills are missing for objectives which are whole-class weaknesses.

Page 16: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

16

Post-Analysis Decision-Making

My next step adjustments might include:

• Adjusting my entire instructional sequence to include objectives that I now realize students need (or to delete objectives that the whole class has mastered).

• Finding time within my day/lesson to include remediation of objectives for individuals, small groups, or the whole group.

• Finding ways to build in reinforcement of certain objectives during lessons focusing on other objectives.

Page 17: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

17

Instructional Strategies to Re-Teach or Reinforce-(pg. 394)Methods for reteaching objectives / building prerequisite skills:

• Offering small-group instruction, to reteach content/skills explicitly

• Including review or practice of target objectives in daily Do Nows/morning messages

• Building in practice with taret skills/content through classroom centers

• Offering differentiated homework assignments to ensure that students can continue to practice skills/content they need

• Tutoring students on objectives they have not mastered before or after-school

• Scaffolding independent practice so that it starts with prerequisite objectives and works up to more challenging, current objectives

• Including questions related to previously-taught objectives in guided practice

Page 18: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

18

Key Idea

The most effective teachers consistently analyze their data

and make instructional choices based on those

results.

Page 19: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

19

CS Think-Aloud: Analyzing Data (1 of 10)pg. 396-397

What are my classes’

strengths?

What are my classes’

weaknesses?

Page 20: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

20

CS Think-Aloud: Analyzing Data (2 of 10)

•79% of students mastered #M03-S1C1-05: “Write whole #’s through 100 in or out of order.”

“This is a whole-class strength, which is important because this objective is foundational to mastering others in the unit.”

•Over 50% of students mastered 3 other objectives:

63% M03-S1C1-10: “Identify odd and even whole #’s.”

58% M03-S1C1-14: “Compare measurable characteristics of

two objects.”

58% M04-S1C1-02: “Order 3 or more whole #’s through 100.”

“We’re pretty weak on the rest of the objectives – student mastery does not exceed 50% on any of them.”

Page 21: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

21

CS Think-Aloud: Analyzing Data (3 of 10)

What trends are there among objectives?

Page 22: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

22

CS Think-Aloud: Analyzing Data (4 of 10)

•4 objectives deal with representing whole #’s in different forms:

M03-S1C1-06, M03-S1C1-07, M03-S1C1-08, M03-S1C1-09

“Even though 79% can write whole #’s, my students are having trouble with place value and representing numbers in different ways.”

Page 23: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

23

CS Think-Aloud: Analyzing Data (5 of 10)

What pre-requisite skills

might be missing?

Page 24: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

24

CS Think-Aloud: Analyzing Data (6 of 10)

“I’m going to have to further examine how the 1st objective (writing whole #’s) is connected to the 4 dealing with representing these numbers in different forms.”

AND

•50% of students mastered M03-S1C1-16: “Measure a given object using appropriate units of measure.”

“I think this is a pre-requisite skill to other objectives in this unit that are about measurement and accuracy.”

Page 25: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

25

CS Think-Aloud: Analyzing Data (7 of 10)

What are the strengths and challenges of

individual students?

Page 26: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

26

CS Think-Aloud: Analyzing Data (8 of 10)

•Mae Kirby: 71% on diagnostic

“I’ll need to build in additional methods of enrichment for Mae – maybe I can look at objectives that come after this unit to challenge her further.”

•5 students – Michael Ball, Marquis Ford, Ben Malinek, Dara Rodriguez, Elliot Sierra: scored in the 20% range on the diagnostic

“I’ll need to do some small group and individual remediation with these students – and perhaps with the students who scored in the 30% range as well…”

•4 out of the 5 above missed the 1st objective on writing whole #’s

“I’ll need to start with that objective, as it is foundational to mastery of the others.”

Page 27: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

27

CS Think-Aloud: Analyzing Data (9 of 10)

What techniques might I use to

reinforce those objectives with low mastery?

Page 28: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

28

CS Think-Aloud: Analyzing Data (10 of 10)

•School expects teachers to execute the unit plan as it is given – not much room for rearrangement or modification.

“I don’t think I should use the same strategy for every objective and every group of students…”

•Small Group Work: 5 weakest students during lunch

•Daily Do Now: whole-class practice of problems that use students’ prior knowledge – build

students up to that day’s objective•Scaffolded IP: start with easier problems and build up

•Differentiated Hmwk.: all students get to practice the objective, but at varied levels of complexity

Page 29: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

An important know on strategically pairing/ grouping students…

Top HalfMae Kirby- A

Avion Miller- B

John Palmer- B

Sonia Wang- B

Oliver Adams- C

Alex Barnett- C

Shawn Brothers- C

Sarah Jefferson- C

Lucille Michaels- C

Alicia Samson- C

Tamar Weaver- C

Max Webb- C

Bottom HalfAshley Dukes- D

Jessica Smith- D

Kathie Stephenson- D

William Walters- D

Eric Zee- D

Pat Goodberg- E

Rachael Lott- E

Marquis Ford- F

Elliot Sierra- F

Michael Ball- F

Ben Malinek- F

Dara Rodriguez- F29

Page 30: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

30

Practice – Analyzing YOUR Diagnostic Datapg. 395

Immediate Task (in this session)

• Analyze your diagnostic data by answering the questions on the “Student Data Analysis” handout.

Next Task (in follow-up CMA session)

• Figure out how to respond to your diagnostic data, based on the analysis you do in this session

Page 31: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

31

Closing – Evaluation of Process

What are the strengths of this process? What are the challenges of this process?

Think back to the analysis work you just did:

Page 32: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

32

Closing – Key Idea Recap

Answer the following:

1) With regard to data analysis, what do effective teachers do?

2) What does effective data analysis consider?

3) Why is adjusting plans based on data necessary?

Page 33: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

33

Next Steps

• Comparing your responses to the data analysis questions to those of your collaborative partners.

• Working in a follow-up CMA session to determine a response to your data analysis.

• Adjusting your Unit Plan

• Planning for Academic Intervention Hour

• Tracking and responding to student data throughout the summer.

Page 34: PLAN 5 :  Analyzing and  Responding to Data lkirklin.cs.chicago@gmail

34

Bottom Line

It is my responsibility to adjust my instruction if I have evidence my

students aren’t learning.

Take 2 min. to complete your “Corps Member Can” self-tracker.