Top Banner

of 8

Pixelteq v. DELTA DBA DELTA Optical Thin Film North America

Apr 03, 2018

Download

Documents

PatentBlast
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/28/2019 Pixelteq v. DELTA DBA DELTA Optical Thin Film North America

    1/8

    UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURTNORTHERN DISTRICTOFOHIO

    EASTERNDIVISION

    PIXELTEQ, NC.8060Bryan DairyRoadLargo, l o r i d a 33777,

    P l a i n t i f f ,

    v .DELTA / b / a DELTAOPTICALTHIN FILMNORTHAMERICA105 Ch adb ourneDriveHudson, Ohio 44236,

    Defendant.

    : C i v i l ActionNo.: Judg e

    : COMPLAINT: (JuryDemandEndorsedHereon)

    P l a i n t i f f P i x e l t e q , I n c . , f o r i t s Complaint g a i n s t Defendant DELTA / b / a DELTA

    O p t i c a l Thin Film North America, by t s u n d e r s i g n e d c o u n s e l , hereby a l l e g e s a s f o l l o w s :

    PARTIES

    1 . P l a i n t i f f P i x e l t e q , I n c . ( " P i x e l t e q " ) i s a c o r p o r a t i o n o r g a n i z e d ande x i s t i n g under

    t h e laws of l o r i d a w i t h i t s p r i n c i p a l p l a c e of u s i n e s s l o c a t e d a t 8060 BryanDairy Road, argo,F l o r i d a 33777.

    2 . For many y e a r s , P i x e l t e q ha s been i n t h e b u s i n e s s , i n t e r a l i a , of m a n u f a c t u r i n g ,

    m a r k e t i n g , o f f e r i n g f o r s a l e , and s e l l i n g o p t i c a l t h i n f i l m s .3 . P i x e l t e q has i n v e s t e d l a r g e sum s n r e s e a r c h andde velopment o produ ce t u n a b l e

    v a r i a b l e bandp ass o p t i c a l f i l t e r s .

    1

  • 7/28/2019 Pixelteq v. DELTA DBA DELTA Optical Thin Film North America

    2/8

    4 . Upon n f o r m a t i o n and b e l i e f , Defendant DELTA / b / a DELTA p t i c a l Thin FilmNorth America ("Defendant") s a f o r e i g n c o r p o r a t i o n w i t h i t s p r i n c i p a l p l a c e of b u s i n e s s i nNorth America o c a t e d a t 105 Chadbourne D r i v e , Hudson, hi o 44236.

    5 . Defendant i s a c o m p e t i t o r of P i x e l t e q w i t h r e s p e c t t o o p t i c a l f i l t e r s and hasi n d e p e n d e n t l y a n d / o r i n combination w i t h o t h e r s p r e s e n t l y unknown, developed, m a n u f a c t u r e d ,imported, marketed, i s t r i b u t e d , s o l d , o f f e r e d f o r s a l e , u s e d , s u p p l i e d , m a d e a n d / o r caused t o bem a d e i n f r i n g i n g t u n a b l e v a r i a b l e bandpass o p t i c a l f i l t e r s , and p r e s e n t l y c o n t i n u e s t o do sothroughout Ohio, n t h i s j u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t , and l s e w h e r e i n t h e United S t a t e s .

    JURISDICTION AND VENUE6 . T h e f o l l o w i n g c l a i m s f o r p a t e n t i n f r i n g e m e n t a r i s e under t h e P a t e n t Laws of h e

    United S t a t e s , 35 U.S.C. e t s e q . This Court has u r i s d i c t i o n over h e s u b j e c t m a t t e r of h e s ec l a i m s p u r s u a n t t o 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1 3 3 8 ( a ) .

    7 . This Court has p e r s o n a l j u r i s d i c t i o n over Defendant b e c a u s e , upon i n f o r m a t i o nand b e l i e f , Defendant e g u l a r l y t r a n s a c t s and conducts b u s i n e s s i n t h i s s t a t e and u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t ,a c t i v e l y and p u r p o s e f u l l y d i r e c t s i t s b u s i n e s s a c t i v i t i e s towards h i s s t a t e and u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t andc i t i z e n s t h e r e o f , and has performed a c t s of a t e n t i n f r i n g e m e n t i n t h i s s t a t e and u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t .

    8 . Venue i s p r o p e r i n t h i s j u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t p u r s u a n t t o 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and c ) ,28 U.S.C. 4 0 0 ( b ) , and LR . 8 because Defendant e s i d e s i n t h i s j u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t .

    STATEMENTOFFACTS

    9 . On ctober 2, 2001, Ocean O p t i c s , I n c . f i l e d a p a t e n t a p p l i c a t i o n i n t h e U n i t e dS t a t e s P a t e n t and Trademark O f f i c e ( " U SP T O " ) o r an i n v e n t i o n known a s Tunable V a r i a b l eBandpass O p t i c a l F i l t e r , which l a i m s p r i o r i t y t o a r o v i s i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n f i l e d October 2, 000.T h e p p l i c a t i o n was s s i g n e d s e r i a l number 09/969,483 " t h e '483 A p p l i c a t i o n " ) .

    2

  • 7/28/2019 Pixelteq v. DELTA DBA DELTA Optical Thin Film North America

    3/8

    1 0 . On March2, 2004,United S t a t e s P a t e n t Number 6,700,690 " t h e '6 9 0P a t e n t " )e n t i t l e d Tunable V a r i a b l e Ban d passO p t i c a l F i l t e r , was dulyand l e g a l l y i s s u e d fromt h e '483A p p l i c a t i o n t o Oce an O p t i c s , I n c . a s a s s i g n e e of h e i n v e n t o r s P h i l i p E. Bu chsb au m an d Jame sD.ane.

    1 1 . On p r i l 1 3 , 2009, anassignment was r e c o r d e d w i t h t h e USPTO,r a n s f e r r i n gownershi pof h e '6 9 0 P a t e n t fromOce an O p t i c s , I n c . t o Oce an Thi n F i l m s , I n c . On p r i l 1 9 ,2013a chan g e of n ame was r e c o r d e d w i t h t h e USPTO,d e n t i f y i n g P i x e l t e q a s t h e own e r of h e`690 a t e n t . A opy of h e '6 9 0 a t e n t i s a t t a c h e d h e r e t o a s E x h i b i t A.

    1 2 . De fendant o f f e r s f o r s a l e an d s e l l s on i t s w e b s i t e( h t t p : / / o r d e r f i l t e r s . m a d e b y d e l t a . c o m / l i n e a r - v a r i a b l e - f i l t e r s . h t m l )a i n e a r v a r i a b l e longwave p a s sf i l t e r (ItemNameLVLWP)n d a i n e a r v a r i a b l e s h o r t wave p a s s f i l t e r (Item Name LVSWP).

    1 3 . Defendant t a t e s t h a t i t "has i f t e d t h e q u a l i t y ofa r i a b l e f i l t e r s t o new e v e l s , b yi n t r o d u c i n g a newpowe rful combinationofa i n e a r v a r i a b l e long wave p a s s(LWP) i l t e r an d t h ec o r r e s p o n d i n g l i n e a r v a r i a b l e s h o r t wave p a s s(SWP)i l t e r " an d h a t "[c] ombining t h e[LVLWPan dLVSWP]i l t e r s e n a b l e s t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n of ban dpass i l t e r s , whose c e n t r e wave lengths an dFWFIM a l u e s can betuned c o n t i n u o u s l y " on t s w e b s i t e a th t t p ://www.md e b y d e l t a . o m / d e l t a / B u s i n e s s _ u n i t s / L O / F i l t e r _ s a t a l o g u e / C a t a l o g u e _ l i n e a r _ y a r i abl e i l t e r s . p a g e

    1 4 . Defen dan t p r o v i d e s a v i d e o e n t i t l e d "DELTA r e s e n t s a T unab leBandpass F i l t e r

    b y comb inat ion of LVSWPan d LVLWP" e m o n s t r a t i n g t h e combination of LVLWP an dLVSWP f i l t e r s t o a c h i e v e a bandpass f i l t e r on i t s w e b s i t e a th t t p /www.mad e b y e l t a . o m / d e l t a / B u s i n e s s _ u n i t s / L O / F i l t e r _ c a t a l o g u / C a t a l o g u e l i n e ary r i a bl e _ f i l t e r s . p a g e

    3

  • 7/28/2019 Pixelteq v. DELTA DBA DELTA Optical Thin Film North America

    4/8

    1 5 . D e f e n d a n t ' s v i d e o e n t i t l e d "DELTA p r e s e n t s a Tunable Bandpass F i l t e r by

    combination o f LVSWP nd LVLWP" arkets performance d a t a a n d / o r c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s s p e c i f i c

    t o wavelength and bandwidth v a r i a t i o n s which, upon i n f o r m a t i o n and b e l i e f , c o u l d o n l y be

    a c h i e v e d w i t h t h e combination o f LVLWP and LVSWP i l t e r s a s r e c i t e d i n t h e c l a i m s o f t h e`690 a t e n t .

    1 6 . D e f e n d a n t ' s v i d e o e n t i t l e d "DELTA p r e s e n t s a Tunable Bandpass F i l t e r bycombination o fLVSWP nd LVLWP" e m o n s t r a t e s LVLWP nd LVSWP i l t e r s b e i n g l i n e a r l yc o n t r o l l e d t o v a r y wavelength and bandwidth a s r e c i t e d i n t h e c l a i m s o f h e '690 a t e n t .

    1 7 . Defendant, by i t s d e s i g n , m a n u f a c t u r e , m a r k e t i n g , d e m o n s t r a t i o n , u s e ,i m p o r t a t i o n , o f f e r o f a l e , a n d / o r s a l e o f u n a b l e v a r i a b l e bandpass o p t i c a l f i l t e r s , i n c l u d i n g t h es a l e and a d v e r t i s e d combination o fLVLWP nd LVSWP i l t e r s t o e n a b l e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f u n a b l ev a r i a b l e bandpass o p t i c a l f i l t e r s , w i t h o u t a u t h o r i t y f rom P i x e l t e q , has i n f r i n g e d and c o n t i n u e s t o

    i n f r i n g e o ne o r m o r e c l a i m s o f h e '690 a t e n t , and w i l l c o n t i n u e t o do so u n l e s s i t i s e n j o i n e d byt h i s C o u r t . P i x e l t e q o w n e d t h e '690 a t e n t through t h e p e r i o d o f Defendant's i n f r i n g i n g a c t s ands t i l l o w n s h e '690 a t e n t .

    FIRSTCLAIMFOR RELIEF( I n f r i n g e m e n t o f h e '690 a t e n t )

    1 8 . P i x e l t e q i n c o r p o r a t e s by r e f e r e n c e t h e f a c t u a l a l l e g a t i o ns s e t f o r t h i n P a r a g r a p h s 1t h r o u g h 17 above a s i f s e t f o r t h h e r e i n i n f u l l .

    1 9 . Defendant has i n f r i n g e d and is i n f r i n g i n g t h e '690 P a t e n t by making, m a r k e t i n g ,d e m o n s t r a t i n g , u s i n g , i m p o r t i n g , s e l l i n g , o f f e r i n g t o s e l l , o r c a u s i n g t o be m a d e t u n a b l e v a r i a b l ebandpass o p t i c a l f i l t e r s , i n c l u d i n g t h e s a l e and a d v e r t i s e d combination o fLVLWP nd LVSWPf i l t e r s t o e n a b l e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t u n a b l e v a r i a b l e bandpass o p t i c a l f i l t e r s , p r o t e c t e d by o ne o r

    4

  • 7/28/2019 Pixelteq v. DELTA DBA DELTA Optical Thin Film North America

    5/8

    more c l a i m s of h e '690 P a t e n t i n v i o l a t i o n of35U.S.C. 7 1 ( a ) , and w i l l c o n t i n u e t o doso

    u n l e s s i t i s e n j o i n e d by t h i s C o u r t .20. Upon n f o r m a t i o n and b e l i e f , Defendanthasa c t i v e l y induced,and w i l l c o n t i n u e t o

    a c t i v e l y i n d u c e , o t h e r s t o i n f r i n g e t h e '690 P a t e n t t h r o u g h o u t Oh io, w i t h i n t h i s j u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t ,

    and e l s e w h e r e throughout t h e United S t a t e s by , amon g o t h e r a c t i v i t i e s , a f f i r m a t i v e l y s e l l i n g ,o f f e r i n g t o s e l l , e n c o u r a g i n g , and i n t e n d i n g f o r i t s customers t o use t h e LVLWPn d / o r LVSWP

    f i l t e r s i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h o t h e r a d v e r t i s e d a p p l i c a t i o n s , v i d e o s , i n s t r u c t i o n s o r p r o c e s s e s t o

    c r e a t e t u n a b l e v a r i a b l e bandpas so p t i c a l f i l t e r s , p r o t e c t e d by oneo r morec l a i m s oft h e '690

    P a t e n t i n v i o l a t i o n of35U.S.C. 7 1 ( b ) , d i d so w i t h knowledge of h e '690P a t e n t , andw i l lc o n t i n u e t o doso u n l e s s i t i s e n j o i n e d by h i s C o u r t .

    21. D e f e n d a n t ' s i n f r i n g e m e n t a n d / o r i nducement ofi n f r i n g e m e n t ofP i x e l t e q ' s '690

    P a t e n t a s s e t f o r t h h e r e i n has been and i s d e l i b e r a t e and w i l l f u l , having r e c e i v e d a c t u a l

    knowledgeof h e '690 P a t e n t and P i x e l t e q ' s n o t i c e of n f r i n g e m e n t of h e '690 P a t e n t t h r o u g h

    c o r r e s p o n d e n c e d a t e d J a n u a r y 24, 2013, maki ng t h i s ane x c e p t i o n a l c a s e w i t h i n t h e meani ng of

    35 U.S.C. 285.22. D e f e n d a n t ' s i n f r i n g e m e n t a n d / o r i nducement ofi n f r i n g e m e n t of P i x e l t e q ' s '690

    P a t e n t has caused and w i l l c o n t i n u e t o c a u s e P i x e l t e q monetary d amag eandi r r e p a r a b l e h armf o rwhi ch t has no adequate remedya t la w.

    PRAYERFORRELIEF

    WHEREFORE,i x e l t e q r e q u e s t s judgment:(a) That h e '690 a t e n t , andc l a i m s t h e r e o f , a r e v a l i d and e n f o r c e a b l e ;

    (b) That Defendant has i n f r i n g e d oneo r more of h e claimsof h e '690 P a t e n t and

    t h a t t s i n f r i n g e m e n t has been w i l l f u l ;

    5

  • 7/28/2019 Pixelteq v. DELTA DBA DELTA Optical Thin Film North America

    6/8

    (c) ThatDefendant i s l i a b l e f o r inducemen t of n f r i n g e m e n t of one o r moreof t h e

    c l a i m s of h e '690 a t e n t and t h a t i t s inducementof n f r i n g e m e n t has been w i l l f u l ;(d ) That P i x e l t e q has been i r r e p a r a b l y harmed by t h e i n f r i n g i n g a c t i v i t i e s of

    Defendant;(e) That Defendant, i t s r e s p e c t i v e p a r e n t a n d / o r s u b s i d i a r y companies, o f f i c e r s ,

    a g e n t s , s e r v a n t s , employees andt h o s e p e r s o n s i n a c t of o n c e r t o r p a r t i c i p a t i o n w i t h anyof hem,

    a s w e l l a s a l l s u c c e s s o r s o r a s s i g n e e s oft h e i n t e r e s t s o r a s s e t s r e l a t e d t o t u n a b l e v a r i a b l ebandpas s o p t i c a l f i l t e r s , be p r e l i m i n a r i l y and permanently e n j o i n e d and r e s t r a i n e d from

    promoting, s e l l i n g a n d / o r u s i n g any i l t e r s , notl i m i t e d t o t h e LVLWP n d / o r LVSWPi l t e r s , i nc o n j u n c t i o n w i t h o t h e r a d v e r t i s e d a p p l i c a t i o n s , v i d e o s , i n s t r u c t i o n s o r p r o c e s s e s t o c r e a t e t u n a b l e

    v a r i a b l e bandpass o p t i c a l f i l t e r s t h a t i n f r i n g e t h e '690 a t e n t ;

    ( f ) That P i x e l t e q be awarded damag e s a d e q u a t e t o compensate f o r D e f e n d a n t ' s

    i n f r i n g e m e n t , which s h a l l i n c l u d e l o s t p r o f i t s b u t i n no event s h a l l bel e s s thanar e a s o n a b l er o y a l t y f o r t h e use m a d e of h e i n v e n t i o n s oft h e '690P a t e n t by Defend ant i n c l u d i n g p r e - andp o s t-judgment n t e r e s t andc o s t s , i n c l u d i n g expenses n accordance w i t h 35U.S.C. 284;

    (g ) T h a t , oncea c t u a l dam ag e s a r e a s s e s s e d , dam ag e s soa s c e r t a i n e d be t r e b l e d i nview of t h e w i l l f u l andd e l i b e r a t e n a t u r e of t h e i n f r i n g e m e n t and be awarded t o P i x e l t e q i n

    accordance with 35 U.S.C. 84;(h) That h i s c a s e bed e c l a r e d an e x c e p t i o n a l c a s e i n accordance w i t h 35 U.S.C. 285

    i n t h a t P i x e l t e q be awarded t s a t t o r n e y s ' f e e s ; and( i ) ThatP i x e l t e q beawarded such f u r t h e r n e c e s s a r y o r p r o p e r r e l i e f t h i s Cou rt may

    d e e m u s t and e q u i t a b l e .

    6

  • 7/28/2019 Pixelteq v. DELTA DBA DELTA Optical Thin Film North America

    7/8

    R e s p e c t f u l l y submitted,

    / s / Dou glas . FeichtnerJos h ua A.orent z 0074136)Dou glas . F e i c h t n e r (0075160)DINSMORE&HOHLLLP255 East i f t h S t r e e t , S u i t e 1900C i n c i n n a t i , Oh i o 45202Telephone:513)77-8200F a c s i m i l e : (513) 77-8141Email: jos hua.lorentz@dinsmor e.cor nE mai l: doug.fe i c h t n e r @ d i n s mor e . com

    A t t o r n e y s for l a i n t i f fP i x e l t e q , I n c .

    7

  • 7/28/2019 Pixelteq v. DELTA DBA DELTA Optical Thin Film North America

    8/8

    JURYDEMAND

    P u r s u a n t t o Rule 3 8 ( b ) , of h e F e d e r a l Rules of i v i l P r o c e d u r e , P i x e l t e q hereby demands

    a r i a l b y u r y ofl l i s s u e s so t r i a b l e .

    242 8507v3

    R e s p e c t f u l l y s u b m i t t e d ,

    / s / Douglas . F e i c h t n e rJoshua A.Lor entz 0074136)Douglas . F e i c h t n e r (0075160)DINSMORE&HOHLLLP255 East i f t h S t r e e t , S u i t e 1900C i n c i n n a t i , Oh io45202Telephone:513)77-8200F a c s i m i l e :(513) 77-8141E mai l:[email protected] l:dougfeic h t ne r @dinsmore.comA t t o r n e y s or l a i n t i f fP i x e l t e q , I n c .

    8