-
JOIN OUR iBwave USERGROUP ON LINKEDIN
WE WILL BE POSTING ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS WE RECEIVE DURING
THE WEBINAR ON
iBwaves In-Building Talks Webinar Series
PIM: IN-BUILDING SYSTEM DESIGN &
INSTALLATION STRATEGIES FOR LTE
SPECIAL GUEST:
JULY 17, 2013
-
THE STANDARD for in-building network design and
documentation
LEADING TECHNOLOGY & FIRST MOVER in a dynamic and
fast-growing wireless market
9-YEAR-OLD Canadian company privately held
PRESENCE in all Americas, Europe, Middle-East, Africa, Asia and
Oceania
TRUSTED BY 500+ CUSTOMERS in more than 80 countries
-
Phillip Chan Manager, InBuilding System Design
Rogers
ABOUT Rogers is a diversified Canadian communications and media
company. They are one of Canada's largest provider of wireless
voice and data communications services and one of Canada's leading
providers of cable television, high speed internet and telephony
services. Rogers is publicly traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange
and on the New York Stock Exchange. www.rogers.com
John Beadles System Designer
Rogers
Marc Beranger Senior RF Interference Specialist
Rogers
-
IN-BUILDING SYSTEM DESIGN STRATEGIES FOR LTE
Phillip Chan, Manager, Wireless In-Building System Design
July 17, 2013
-
Introduction
PIM is a self-generated noise typically caused by defects in the
antenna system, and by interactions of antennas with nearby
objects
This noise causes: Reduced capacity Reduced coverage Slower data
speed Dropped calls Shorter battery life
In-building DAS systems All channels run on the same antennas
and cables Need for higher capacity, new technologies and DAS
system sharing with
other operators result in potential PIM problems Frequency
planning to avoid PIM is no longer viable This drives the
requirement to minimize PIM noise
-
What is Passive Intermodulation?
Passive Intermodulation noise is the by product when radio
signals mix
These products are combinations of sum and difference of the
signals The center frequency of these resulting products are
mathematically
predictable However, as the number of signals increase, the
number of products
increase significantly
PIM is not related to return loss, VSWR or insertion loss!!! It
cannot be detected by sweeps
-
PIM Noise Products
0 MHz Increasing FrequencyTX BandRX Band
b-a
2nd Order
2a-b3rd Order
2b-a3rd Order
2b-2a4th Order
3b-3a
6th Order3a-2b5th Order
4a-3b7th Order 3b-2a
5th Order
4b-3a7th Order
Actual PIM product amplitude cannot be predicted Varies on a
case by case basis Decreases with the order of product
PIM product bandwidth is proportional to the order and the
bandwidth of the fundamental frequencies 3rd order BW is three
times the bandwidth of the fundamental 5th order BW is five times
the bandwidth of the fundamental
-
Common Sources of PIM
Poor connector assembly Improper installation Damaged connector
face Loose connections due to under torque
Metallic particles contamination In the plenum cable In the
connector assembly In the connector face
Damaged cable Cut or broken conductor Damage to plating
Damaged antenna Broken pigtail Damaged connector face
Antenna Interacting with environment Rusty bolt effect
Manufacturing defects Bad solder joints Poor choice of
materials
Physical damage Improper torque applied Forced fit
-
Why is PIM important for LTE?
LTE system link budget is based on Resource Block (RB)
One RB = 180 kHz (12 Sub Carriers X 15 kHz each)
Thermal Noise of one RB = -121dBm
Assuming eNode B receiver Noise Figure = 2dB, receiver
sensitivity = -119dBm
Any PIM Noise generated in the DAS has to be significantly lower
than -119dBm to not degrade receiver sensitivity
Required PIM Noise
-
LTE Uplink SINR vs. Throughput
SINR (dB) 10MHz UL Through Put (Mbps)0 4.11 4.82 5.63 6.54 7.45
8.56 9.57 10.78 11.89 13.0
10 14.211 15.412 16.613 17.714 18.815 19.716 20.517 21.218
21.819 22.220 22.4
High SINR required for LTE UL Performance LTE UL data throughput
is much more
superior than HSPA UL Requires significant higher SINR than
HSPA Any degradations in receiver sensitivity
impacts throughput DAS system needs to have good PIM
performance to get full benefit of LTE
Note: the above table is based on simulation, and it is only for
illustration purposes.
-
Strategies to Meet LTE PIM Performance Requirement?
Mitigate PIM Problems
Apply DAS design strategies to mitigate PIM problems Achieve PIM
Performance Requirements
Follow installation and testing procedures to improve DAS
construction, and to achieve PIM performance
Strive for Success and Doing it Better Apply real life
experiences and learning from installation work Enhance / revise
design strategies, and installation and testing procedures when
applicable Share knowledge and experiences with the industry, and
get feedback from other indoor DAS solution integrators and
operators Influence the industry to further develop DAS products
and testing equipment to facilitate doing it better
-
Types of DAS: Hi Power Active DAS 20W or more
Requires less number of remote amplifiers
Noise Figure from the active DAS components usually does not
require high UL attenuation to mask the active DAS noise
Passive DAS PIM performance is important
-
Types of DAS: Med Power Active DAS ~28dBm
Requires greater number of remote amplifiers than hi power
active DAS
Likely need more UL attenuation to mask the active DAS noise
Passive DAS PIM performance could be more relaxed due the
required UL attenuation
-
Types of DAS: Low Power Active DAS ~20dBm
Requires large number of remote amplifiers
Noise Figure from the active DAS components does require high UL
attenuation to mask the active DAS noise
Passive DAS PIM performance is usually not a concern due to the
high UL attenuation
-
Types of DAS: Passive DAS
Passive DAS PIM performance is very important!
Radio Base Station directly drives the passive DAS
-
Why not only deploy Low Power Active DAS?
High UL attenuation required to mask active DAS component noise
may also have a significant negative impact on the UL SINR
To maintain acceptable DL and UL path loss in-balance, base
station needs to be interfacing the active DAS at much higher
power. This places a huge demand on the required power handling and
PIM performance of the radio base station interface equipment
Low Power Active DAS Uplink SINR Calculation Passive DAS Uplink
SINR Calculation
Downlink Overall Path Loss Downlink Overall Path Loss
RBS Output Power 35dBm RBS Output Power 35dBm
CPICH Output Power 25dBm CPICH Output Power 25dBm
DAS Losses 0.0dB DAS Losses 25.0dB
Remote Antenna ERP 10.0dBm Remote Antenna ERP 10.0dBm
Remote Antenna CPICH ERP 0.0dBm Remote Antenna CPICH ERP
0.0dBm
CPICH Threshold -75dBm CPICH Threshold -75dBm
Pathloss (Antenna to UE) 75.0dB Pathloss (UE to Antenna)
75.0dB
Overall Pathloss 100dB Overall Pathloss 100dB
Uplink Overall Path Loss Uplink Overall Path Loss
Pathloss (UE to Antenna) 75.0dB Pathloss (UE to Antenna)
75.0dB
DAS Losses 0.0dB DAS Losses 25.0dB
DAS UL Noise Figure 39.3dB 85 Remote units DAS UL Noise Figure
0.0dB
DAS UL Gain 0.0dB DAS UL Gain 0.0dB
Rx Sensitivity -119.0dBm Rx Sensitivity -119.0dBm
DAS Noise from Uplink -81.7dBm DAS Noise from Uplink N/A
Required Attenuation 43dB Required Attenuation N/A
DAS Noise Level after Attenuation -124.7dBm
DAS Noise Level after Attenuation N/A
Overall Uplink Pathloss 118dB Overall Uplink Pathloss 100dB
UL and DL Path Inbalance 18dB UL and DL Path Inbalance 0.0dB
DAS Uplink Noise Figure Calculation
Noise Figure per Remote 20dB For 1 Remote
Noise Figure ALL Sectors 39.3dB For 85 Remotes
Uplink Gain ALL Sectors 0.0dB
Uplink Noise Power -81.7dBm
Low Power Active DAS Uplink SINR Calculation Passive DAS Uplink
SINR Calculation
UE Tx Level Total 23.0dBm UE Tx Level Total 23.0dBm
UE Tx Level per RB 6.0dBm UE Tx Level per Subcarrier 6.0dBm
Uplink Pathloss 118dB Uplink Pathloss 100dB
UE Rx Level at RBS per RB -112.0dBm UE Rx Level at RBS per RB
-94.0dBm
Uplink RX Noise Level -118.0dBm Uplink RX Noise Level
-119.0dBm
Uplink SINR per RB 6.0dB Uplink SINR per RB 25.0dB
Uplink Datarate 9.5 Mbps Uplink Datarate 22.4 Mbps
-
Common Denominator: Passive DAS
How do we achieve the LTE PIM performance requirement with the
passive DAS??
-
Design Strategies to Mitigate PIM Problems
Use PIM rated and proven DAS components See following slide for
details
Keep transmit power low See following slide for details
Use simple and intuitive DAS vertical and horizontal topologies
See following slides for details
Established DAS component naming convention Allow creation of
automated testing spreadsheets based on component naming
Standardized naming convention promotes common understanding of the
DAS for the designers, installers and field operation and
maintenance staff
-
DAS System PIM and Return Loss Performance Targets
System Construction Targets 850MHz: System PIM -114dBm @ 2 X
+25dBm 1900MHz: System PIM -127dBm @ 2 X +35dBm System Return Loss
14dB
System Sharing Acceptance Targets 850MHz: System PIM -108dBm @ 2
X +25dBm 1900MHz: System PIM -121dBm @ 2 X +35dBm System Return
Loss 14dB
Difference in construction and acceptance targets allows margin
to ensure that the system will continue to meet the acceptance
target as the DAS ages
-
Use PIM Rated and Proven DAS Components
Use DIN connector as much as possible instead of N-Type Will be
further discussed in an upcoming slide
Lab experiments Rusty bolt effect Component testing
Manufacturer collaboration Connector design and installation
Multi-band combining solution
Installer feedback Part of establishing DAS component proven
performance
Typical passive DAS RF Component PIM Specs Splitter, combiners,
connectors, and cables -155dBc @ 2 X 43dBm Indoor antennas are
subjected to real life environment testing as the
manufacturer PIM spec is very different when testing in real
life environment DAS head end multi-band combining solution -162dBc
@ 2 X 35dBm
-
Keep Transmit Power Low
Radio Base Station output power = 35dBm composite per channel
Typical minimum passive component PIM spec is -150dBc @ 2 x 43dBm.
Assuming 2.5dB roll off, the PIM response at 2 X 35dBm is estimated
to be -127dBm Lower power handling passive components could be
used
Max power into the antenna = 15dBm composite per channel
Significantly minimizes the rusty bolt effects when antenna
interacts with its environment Typical design power is about 10dBm
composite per channel, dependent on size of coverage area and
environment in terms of rusty bolt effect
-
Vertical Design Organized by Floor
Organized vertically and horizontally
Construction and testing could be done on a per floor basis
Fault isolation on a per floor level can begin in the equipment
room
1st Floor
2nd Floor
3rd Floor
4th Floor
5th Floor
6th Floor
-
Vertical Design Not Organized by Floor
Not organized vertically or horizontally
Construction and testing cannot be done on a per floor level
Fault isolation will require a lot of test equipment movement,
possible access issues
Difficult to maintain from a Field Operation and Maintenance
point of view
1st Floor
2nd Floor
3rd Floor
4th Floor
5th Floor
6th Floor
-
Horizontal Design Organized for Testing
Centralized location of splitter components
Can provide fault isolation to the branch level, depending on
design
Minimizes the amount of test set movement, therefore less test
labor time
-
Horizontal Design Not Organized for Testing
Decentralized location of splitter components
Maximizes the amount of test set movement, therefore more test
labor time
Many cascaded components increase the points of failure for the
floor
-
DAS TEST PROCEDURES AND REPORTING
John Beadles, System Designer, Rogers Communications
July 17, 2013
-
Goals for Testing
Goals for Testing Thoroughly test and exercise new DAS systems
before acceptance
Prove that the system is being constructed properly Prove that
the system passes PIM at acceptance Provide evidence that it will
continue to pass in the future Prevent hidden quality control
problems from popping up at the last minute
Get projects done on schedule, on budget Make the projects
predictable So that they can be controllable Then cost controls can
be implemented
Challenges Local contractors have little prior PIM testing
experience Some contractors have little or no cellular construction
experience at all Contractors not typically experienced with
handling a lot of test data Need to streamline the testing
process
Make it flow as much as possible so that milestones can be met
Make no assumptions about previous contractor experience
Test requirements need to be flexible enough to accommodate all
project types
Organized so that connector damage caused by testing is
minimized
-
Types of Tests
PIM Testing Proves that the system is free of defects that would
cause self-generated
noise back into the receivers
Return Loss Testing Ensures that the TX power doesnt get
reflected back toward the transmitter Prevents early transmitter
failure Ensures that RF power actually contributes to coverage
Insertion Loss Testing Verifies that the correct power tappers
are installed Verifies that the power tappers facing the correct
direction Ensures that each antenna will see the correct TX
power
Distance to Fault Testing Provides individual cable lengths
Finds damaged cables Helps prove that the contractor is building
the system as designed
-
Test Procedure (Antenna & Individual Cable)
Pre-Install Antenna Testing PIM Test Ensures that the
environment around the antenna wont contribute to failing
PIM at the antenna
Post Install Antenna Testing PIM Test Return Loss Test Ensures
that the antenna performs properly in the installed position, and
that
the antenna VSWR wont prevent the antenna from covering the area
properly
Individual Cable Testing PIM Test Return Loss Test Distance to
fault Ensures that each cable meets a standard quality spec Helps
remove the cables as a source of problems when debugging other
issues Ensures that the cable is close to the length the system
designer intended
-
Pre- and Post- Install Antenna Testing
Pre-Install antenna testing uses an antenna on a stick to verify
the PIM environment in the area around which the antenna will be
mounted
Post-Install antenna testing proves the antenna at that
particular location
These tests have been a key to getting good antenna
performance
-
System, Floor, Branch Level Components
Syst
emC
om
bin
er
Rad
ioR
adio
Rad
io
Floor 1
Floor 2
Floor 3
Floor 4
Floor 5
Floor 6
System Combiner Level Components
System Level Components
(multiple floors)
Floor Level Components(1 per floor)
Branch Level Components(multiple per floor, feeds antennas,
no
more than 5 antennas per branch)
Riser Room
-
Test Procedure (Branches)
Branch Construction Test PIM test set attached to the entry
point of the branch Low PIM terminations in place of antennas Test
pass level -150 dBc @ 2x 43dBm when all jumpers and combiners
are
attached. This test proves that the branch cabling is defect
free
Branch Insertion Loss Test Signal generator attached to the
entry point of the branch Power measurement taken at the output of
each antenna jumper and is
compared to a predicted value. This test detects improperly
installed power splitters and tappers. Also finds contractor
modifications Antennas attached to each jumper after each test is
complete
Branch Antenna PIM Test PIM test set attached to the entry point
of the branch. Test is taken with all antennas attached PIM test
power is set to the system design power at that point
Minimizes environmental PIM between the antennas and their
surroundings Pass/fail is set to a dBm value based on receiver
threshold, construction margin
-
Branch Construction & Testing
PIM Tester
S49-1 S49-2 S49-3C49-103
C4
9-1
04
C4
9-1
05
C49-101FloorFeeder
C49-102
C4
9-1
06
C4
9-1
07
S49-1 S49-2 S49-3C49-103
C4
9-1
04
C4
9-1
05
C49-101FloorFeeder
C49-102
C4
9-1
06
C4
9-1
07
Signal Generator
PIM Tester
S49-1 S49-2 S49-3C49-103
C4
9-1
04
C4
9-1
05
C49-101FloorFeeder
C49-102
C4
9-1
06
C4
9-1
07
Branch constructed and terminated with low PIM loads.
Construction PIM test performed.
Branch Antenna PIM test performed with all antennas attached. If
it passes, testing is complete on this branch and no other
disconnects are allowed.
Stepwise insertion loss testing performed at each antenna
connector, then the antenna is attached.
Power
Meter
-
Floor / Branch Organization
Each floor organized into a floor combiner network with multiple
branches
Each branch, and the floor divider network, are tested as a
unit
Minimizes the number of expensive low PIM test terminations that
the contractor must purchase
SPT G2-3-3
SPT G2-3-8
SPT G2-3-12 SPT G2-3-5SPT G2-3-4 SPT G2-3-7 SPT G2-3-9 SPT
G2-3-1
SPT G2-3-6 SPT G2-3-2
SPT G2-3-10 SPT G2-3-11
C G2_3-25
C G
2_3
-21
C G
2_3
-22
C G
2_3
-23
C G
2_3
-54
C G
2_3
-86
C G
2_3
-85
C G
2_3
-24
C G
2_3
-83
C G
2_3
-28
C G
2_3
-32
C G
2_3
-36
C G
2_3
-37
C G
2_3
-35
C G
2_3
-34
C G
2_3
-31
C G
2_3
-55
C G
2_3
-56
C G
2_3
-29
C G2_3-82 C G2_3-26
C G
2_3
-27
C G2_3-33 C G2_3-28
ANT G2_3-11
ANT G2_3-6 ANT G2_3-8 ANT G2_3-13 ANT G2_3-14 ANT G2_3-1
ANT G2_3-7 ANT G2_3-2 ANT G2_3-5
ANT G2_3-12 ANT G2_3-15 ANT G2_3-9 ANT G2_3-3ANT G2_3-14ANT
G2_3-10
PIM Tester
Branch 1
Branch 2
Branch 3Branch 4
Branch 5
Floor Divider Network
-
Test Procedure (Floor & System Level)
Floor Testing Insertion Loss Test Return Loss Test PIM Test
These tests, from the first unique floor level cable, ensures that
all cables
and passive devices, are installed correctly and functioning
properly
System (Sector) Testing Insertion Loss Test Return Loss Test PIM
Test Ensures that the entire system, with the exception of the
combiner, is
working and that all system level cables and passive components
are installed correctly and functioning properly
System Combiner Testing PIM Test (Each Input) Verifies that the
combiner and assorted inputs are working
-
Project Acceptance
Performed by Rogers Personnel Maximum accountability Eliminates
communications problems with the contractor
System level PIM test Or performed by contractor while being
observed by Rogers auditor
System level return loss test Or performed by contractor while
being observed by Rogers auditor
Coverage testing Verify that all antennas are covering properly
Finds accidental system disconnects
Delivery of all test results from contractor Reviewed &
approved by the system designer
-
Contractor Deliverables
Completed test spreadsheet All values must pass Or have
variances accepted by Rogers
PIM test measurements Screen shots (compiled into PDF)
Return loss measurements Screen shots (compiled into PDF) Data
file (.DAT, .VNA)
Distance to fault measurements Screen shots (compiled into PDF)
Data file (.DAT, .VNA)
Photographs Pre, post antenna location
Floor diagram markups
-
Automated Test Spreadsheet
Custom Developed by Rogers Identifies each test required from
the contractor Used by project manager to cost out the testing Used
by the contractor to define test parameters, collect test data Used
by the system designer for QC monitoring, acceptance
Created by the system designer, custom for each project
Loaded by importing iBwave reports using Excel macros iBwave
Link Budget Report
Provides insertion loss at any point Used to test power at each
test point
iBwave Cable Routing Report Provides the cable lengths,
connection points Used to calculate branch, system topology
Custom excel macro Generates one worksheet per test type
Recalculates test powers based on desired test frequency Generates
custom PIM test powers depending on design power Generates
predicted insertion losses for branch, floor and system level tests
Provides logic for pass/fail color coding for each test
Each worksheet contains: Sector, floor and Test Point ID Test
powers Pass levels Predicted line lengths Insertion losses
-
From iBwave to the Automated Test Spreadsheet
iBwave Cable Routing Report
iBwave Link Budget Report Rogers Automated Test Spreadsheet
iBwave
Import
-
Examples of Antenna & Cable Worksheets
Post-install Antenna Worksheet
RF Cable Worksheet
Pre-install Antenna Worksheet
Test Cable Attn
(dB)
Test Pwr (dBm)
Test Pim (dBm)
Pass Level (dBm)
1 Ground Floor AP-A-01A 16 -114 5 21 -136.1 -1191 Ground Floor
AP-A-01B 15 -114 5 20 -139.2 -1191 Ground Floor AP-A-02A 15 -114 5
20 -134.1 -1191 Ground Floor AP-A-02B 15 -114 5 20 -128.5 -1191
Ground Floor AP-A-03A 15 -114 5 20 -130.6 -119
Antenna Placement Test
Sector Floor Test IDDesign
Pwr (dBm)
850 PIM Pass Level (dBm)
850 Mhz PIM Test
Sweep-RL (dB)Test
Cable Attn (dB)
Test Pwr (dBm)
Test Pim (dBm)
Pass Level (dBm)
Test Cable Attn
(dB)
Test Pwr (dBm)
Test Pim (dBc)
Pass Level (dBm)
698-2700 mHz
1 Ground Floor A-01A 16 15 -114 -127 5 21 -129.5 -119 5 20
-133.7 -132 15.231 Ground Floor A-01B 15 15 -114 -127 5 20 -121.9
-119 5 20 -133.9 -132 17.741 Ground Floor A-02A 15 15 -114 -127 5
20 -124.2 -119 5 20 -133.7 -132 13.111 Ground Floor A-02B 15 15
-114 -127 5 20 -131.1 -119 5 20 -135 -132 17.451 Ground Floor A-03A
15 15 -114 -127 5 20 -132.8 -119 5 20 -133.8 -132 17.77
Sector
Installed Antenna Test Installed Antenna Test
Floor Test IDDesign Pwr 850 (dBm)
Design Pwr 2100
(dBm)
850 PIM Pass Level (dBm)
2100 PIM Pass Level (dBm)
850 Mhz PIM Test 2100 MHz PIM Test
850 MHz (2x43 dBm) 2100 MHz (2x 43 dBm) Design Plan Cable
Predicted IL (dB) Measured IL (dB)
Sector Floor RF-Cable-ID Return Loss (dB) Length (meters) High
Pim (dBc) High Pim (dBc) Length (meters) 2110 MHz 2110 MHz1 Ground
Floor C1-44 34.20 2.63 -162.4 -155.7 10.00 1.6 0.461 Ground Floor
C1-40 30.66 0.31 -158.9 -165.90 2.00 0.6 0.081 Ground Floor C1-48
35.85 0.50 -164.3 -162.5 2.00 0.6 0.121 Ground Floor C1-39 32.55
4.96 -158.3 -151.1 5.00 1.0 0.661 Ground Floor C1-42 29.18 0.01
-156.9 -157.7 2.00 0.6 0.161 Ground Floor C1-43 33.26 6.87 -151.8
-167.9 5.00 1.0 0.871 Ground Floor C1-46 35.52 1.00 -158 -164.5
2.00 0.6 0.191 Ground Floor C1-47 37.96 0.06 -158.3 -158.4 2.00 0.6
0.12
Sweep Test (1710-2155 MHz)
Test ID specifies the particular antenna. The AP prefix is used
to separate PIM test screen shots
Test ID specifies the cable
-
Examples of Branch Worksheets Branch Construction PIM
Worksheet
Branch Antenna PIM Worksheet
Branch Insertion Loss Worksheet
850 MHz (2x43 dBm) 2100 MHz (2x 43 dBm)
Sector Floor Test ID High Pim (dBc) High Pim (dBc)1 Ground Floor
BP-C1-9 -153.2 -150.91 Ground Floor BP-C1-19 -158.2 -153.31 Ground
Floor BP-C1-10 -160 -165.31 Ground Floor BP-C1-23 -171 -166.11
Ground Floor BP-C1-27 -167.5 -165.41 Ground Floor BP-C1-40 -170.9
-154.31 Ground Floor BP-C1-28 -162.1 -165.61 Ground Floor BP-C1-46
-158.3 -152.5
Measured Insertion Loss (dB)
Predicted Insertion Loss (dB)
Sector Floor Test ID 2110 MHz 2110 MHz1 Ground Floor
BI-C1-9-C1-6 12.32 11.551 Ground Floor BI-C1-19-C1-20 12.40 11.551
Ground Floor BI-C1-9-C1-50 12.56 12.121 Ground Floor BI-C1-19-C1-11
12.06 12.311 Ground Floor BI-C1-9-C1-49 10.22 10.371 Ground Floor
BI-C1-19-C1-26 9.90 10.57
Sector Floor Test ID
Test Power (dBm)
Test PIM (dBm)
Pass Level (dBm)
Test Power (dBm)
Test PIM (dBm)
Pass Level (dBm)
1 Ground Floor BAP-C1-9 15 -131.2 -114 26 -133.6 -1271 Ground
Floor BAP-C1-19 15 -130.3 -114 26 -127.4 -1271 Ground Floor
BAP-C1-10 15 -130.4 -114 23 -128.1 -1271 Ground Floor BAP-C1-23 15
-129.9 -114 23 -127 -1271 Ground Floor BAP-C1-27 15 -98.2 -114 15
-100.2 -1271 Ground Floor BAP-C1-40 15 -129.8 -114 15 -121.8
-127
850 MHz PIM Test 2100 MHz PIM Test
Test ID specifies the jumper entering the branch, exiting the
jumper facing an antenna
Test ID specifies the jumper entering that branch. All antenna
jumpers are terminated with low PIM loads.
Test ID specifies the jumper entering that branch. All antennas
are installed at this point.
-
Examples of Floor Worksheets
Measured Insertion Loss (dB) Predicted Insertion Loss (dB)
Sector Floor Test ID 2110 MHz 2110 MHz1 Ground Floor
FI-C1-4-C1-9 2.26 2.321 Ground Floor FI-C1-54-C1-19 2.25 2.321
Ground Floor FI-C1-4-C1-10 4.94 5.321 Ground Floor FI-C1-54-C1-23
4.98 5.321 Ground Floor FI-C1-33-C1-27 3.72 4.581 Ground Floor
FI-C1-44-C1-40 3.72 4.581 Ground Floor FI-C1-33-C1-28 3.78 4.581
Ground Floor FI-C1-44-C1-46 3.78 4.58
Floor Insertion Loss Worksheet
Return Loss
Sweep-Return Loss(dB)
PIM
Sector Floor Test ID698-2700 mHz Test ID
Test Pwr (dBm)
Test PIM (dBm)
Pass Level (dBm)
Test Pwr (dBm)
Test PIM (dBm)
Pass Level (dBm)
1 Ground Floor FR-C1-4 13.74 FAP-C1-4 15 -130.9 -114 28 -130.1
-1271 Ground Floor FR-C1-54 13.81 FAP-C1-54 15 -129.8 -114 28
-131.5 -1271 Ground Floor FR-C1-33 11.67 FAP-C1-33 15 -108.1 -114
15 -112.8 -1271 Ground Floor FR-C1-44 14.84 FAP-C1-44 15 -100.1
-114 15 -127.3 -127
850 MHz PIM Test 2100 MHz PIM Test
Floor PIM & RL Worksheet
Test ID specifies the first single jumper entering that
floor
Test ID specifies the input as the jumper entering that floor
and the output of each power splitter facing the individual
branches
-
Examples of System Worksheets
Return Loss Sweep-RL (dB)
SectorFloor Test ID Test Pwr
(dBm)Test PIM
(dBm)
Pass Level (dBm)
Test Pwr (dBm)
Test PIM (dBm)
Pass Level (dBm) Test ID
698-2700 mHz
1 Ground Floor SCP- 1-1900-1A 25 -114 35 -130.6 -127 SCR-
1-1900-1A 18.351 Ground Floor SCP- 1-1900-1B 25 -114 35 -127 SCR-
1-1900-1B 17.581 Ground Floor SCP- 1-2100-1A 25 -114 35 -127 SCR-
1-2100-1A 18.741 Ground Floor SCP- 1-2100-1B 25 -114 35 -130.8 -127
SCR- 1-2100-1B 18.711 Ground Floor SCP- 1-850-1A 25 -133.9 -114 35
-127 SCR- 1-850-1A 17.71 Ground Floor SCP- 1-850-1B 25 -122 -114 35
-127 SCR- 1-850-1B 17.74
850 MHz PIM Test 1900 and/or 2100 MHz PIM Test
System Insertion Loss Worksheet
System PIM & Return Loss Worksheet
System Combiner Worksheet
Test ID specifies each input port on the system level
combiner
Test ID specifies the jumper coming out of the system combiner,
facing the DAS network
Test ID specifies the input as the jumper coming out of the
system combiner and the output of the power splitter facing the
floor
-
Thats a Lot of Testing!
Yes it is! But it is necessary to ensure that all the parts of
the DAS are working and will
continue to work
Cant some of the testing be eliminated? Sure, but eliminating
any part increases risk
Some problems may not be found until system turn-up or later Can
the contractor find and fix problems in a timely fashion?
Do they have previous experience? Are their construction and
test crews experienced? Does the contractor have personnel turnover
issues?
What is the added cost of finding problems late? Scheduled
access restrictions Cost of security, cleaning crews, elevator
access Contract requirements Customer, property manager
relationships
What is the cost of a PIM problem found later in the system life
cycle? After other operators are added? Maintenance cost?
May be possible to reduce some testing As confidence in
contractor competence increases As DAS components become more
resistant to PIM Antenna environmental PIM not likely to ever go
away
-
REAL WORLD DAS PIM TESTING
Marc Beranger, Sr. RF Interference Specialist, Radio
Engineering
July 17, 2013
-
In-Building DAS Construction Testing
Real World PIM Challenges Highlight some of the issues we have
had through nearly two years of
developing our design and test procedures.
Build then Test VS Test as we Build Will provide reasons why we
approach testing the way we do
DAS Performance Achievements Examine the progress we have made
to date
DAS Specific Test Equipment Focus on PIM testing equipment and
the requirements necessary to properly
test DAS systems
-
Real World PIM Challenges - Components
PIM Rated Components Splitters, Tappers, Antennas
All must be PIM rated Combiners near the radio may need better
PIM specs due to LTE noise
requirements Typical: -150 dBc @ 2x 43 dBm (-107 dBm) Our spec:
-162 dBc @ 2x 35 dBm (-127 dBm)
Connectors Some field installable connectors work well on foam
filled outdoor cable But can fail dynamic PIM because of
differences in conductor thickness
Factory Jumper Cables Have been known to fail dynamic PIM
Be prepared to do quality control checks on all components,
because manufacturing accidents do happen
-
Real World PIM Challenges - Training
Contractor Training and Feedback Rogers provides mandatory
contractor training, including:
Connector installation training (supplied by the connector
vendor) Overview of PIM relating to DAS Lessons learned from
previous projects Review of test procedures and deliverables Review
of test data collection Hands on training in pre-install antenna
location procedure
Rogers constantly updates this training based on feedback from
contractors
-
Real World PIM Challenges Connector Assembly Proper Installation
and assembly of connectors and cabling
Plenum cable is hollow. Metal particles can fall inside and
create PIM. During earlier projects we have had to replace almost
all cable on several floors to clear PIM
Hack saws and files MUST NOT be used! PVC pipe cutter provides a
clean cut. Clean cable ends during with isopropyl alcohol during
cable prep Cover unterminated cable ends with plastic caps or
electrical tape Bad flares, ragged cuts, plating damage can result
in poor PIM
-
Real World PIM Challenges - Contamination
Metal wears off the threads during each connection and stick to
the threads or conducting surfaces. If this metal gets in between
the conducting surfaces, PIM noise can be created.
Clean with alcohol before each connector mating.
Clean any protective caps for adapters
-
CLEAN ALL CONNECTORS ALL THE TIME!!
Using a swab and a stick, wipe between the inner and outer
connector
Next wipe the insulator and metal surfaces
Using the clean side of the swap, use your finger to wipe the
tops of the inner and outer conductor
Real World PIM Challenges Cleaning
-
Real World PIM Challenges Connector Torque
Connectors must be correctly torqued to pass PIM
Undertorque results in unstable connections, causing
failures
Overtorque can result in damage to connectors, causing
failures
Experience shows that good PIM performance with N connectors is
possible using slight overtorque.
7-16 DIN connectors are strongly recommended wherever
possible
Test cables and adapters must be monitored for torque related
damage
This connector is ok Broken
Broken
Broken
-
Real World PIM Challenges - Connector Stress
The system to the right was secured to the wall with cable
clamps, drywall anchors
These connectors would fail PIM erratically
The system was redesigned with secured power dividers and stress
relief loops
PIM issues were dramatically reduced
-
Real World Challenges - Rusty Bolt PIM Noise PIM Noise can be
created by RF interaction between the antenna and conductive
objects in the environment outside the antenna system. PIM
sources can be both below and above the antenna.
This is unpredictable but using general guidelines and the
antenna pre-install procedure, we can find antenna locations that
limit the impact of environmental PIM
850 MHz frequencies tends to be more reactive then AWS/PCS
frequencies within the environment. This is reflected in our system
level test specs AWS/PCS -127 dBm at a test power of 2x35 dBm 850
-114 dBm at a test power of 2x25 dBm
POTENTIAL PIM SOURCES Electrical cabling
Ceiling mounting hardwareLighting control devices
ABOVE ANTENNA
BELOW ANTENNAPOTENTIAL PIM SOURCES
Suspended lighting or pipingMetal on metal contact points
Mounting Surface
-
Various sources of Rusty Bolt PIM
Suspect components Ballast in fluorescent lights DC power
supplies in LED lights Steel hardware Heat Sensors
Keep antennas at least 1 metre away
Generally an open concrete ceiling has better environmental PIM
response than a suspended ceiling
-
Case Study-Foil backed insulation & Steel Studs
PIM noise observed in antennas mounted on walls with foil backed
insulation
Remove insulation from behind antennas
Install antennas between steel studs where possible.
Relocate occurred on most of the floors where the antenna was
positioned in this location
FRONT VIEW BACK VIEW
-
Case Study-RF Absorber Material
Can be helpful when PIM source is above the antenna.
If you lower your antenna during pre-install PIM testing and the
PIM improves then your prime PIM source is likely above the
antenna.
This is not a solution for all situations but it is one more
tool in the toolkit.
Expensive!
-
Build then Test vs. Test while Building
Build then Test (then fix as required) Advantages
Faster, cheaper to construct, if number of defects is small
(unlikely with PIM) Disadvantages
Large number of defects can dramatically slow fault finding
(likely) If fault finding not built in to schedule, likely to
result in schedule, cost overruns Schedule overruns likely due to
probable high number of PIM failures Uncaught contamination issues
led to whole floors of cables being replaced
Test while Building Advantages
Contractor has immediate quality control feedback Operator can
monitor contractor quality Assurance that construction is correct
before moving on in restricted access situations Finds common
defect types early
Environmental PIM Manufacturer defects Technique errors Faulty
equipment
Disadvantages Slower, more costly to construct (but built into
project)
-
DAS Performance Achievements
Pool of contractors that build and test our DAS systems
increasing Now contractors that had no previous DAS experience
being successful Continue to monitor existing contractors to
improve performance and
incorporate their feedback in testing procedures.
The most recent acceptance audits are now completed in one
visit. Initially we struggled to meet acceptance specifications,
with many return
visits.
Typical low PIM DAS construction effort of a single floor of an
office initially took up to 2 weeks to test and install, now we can
do this in less than a week. 8-12 antennas, 20,000 sq. ft.
-
DAS Specific Test Equipment Recommendations
PIM Interaction between the antennas and the environment drives
design requirements for lower TX power per antenna Non linear
response prevents testing of antennas using scaled power, PIM
results PIM testing needs to be done at system design powers, PIM
acceptance values need to be related to receiver thresholds Drives
a need for PIM test eqpt with lower test powers, better
sensitivity, lower residual PIM
Test reporting is a key to successful PIM quality control PIM
testing of macro site PIM testing may generate tens of reports a
week DAS PIM testing may generate hundreds of reports a week, for
weeks at a time To improve productivity, PIM test eqpt needs better
ways to manage reports Test spreadsheet already defines test IDs,
test parameters Allowing upload of test spreadsheet into PIM test
set would eliminate a lot of operator data
entry Ethernet capable, remote operation?
Test equipment connections Test equipment uses N, DIN connectors
Connectors wear with each connect / disconnect cycle, require
cleaning each time DAS testing has hundreds of connect / disconnect
cycles a week, for weeks at a time Need a better, non-threaded on
test equipment for time savings
Hands-on, DAS specific training needed from PIM test set
manufacturers Must include in-building environmental antenna
effects
-
DAS Specific Test Equipment Recommendations
Ideal PIM Test Set Test Power Range
+43 dBm to +20 dBm in 1 dB increments (minimum) +43 dBm to +10
dBm in 1 dB increments (desired) +43 dBm (20w) power needed to for
component acceptance testing Adjustable low power needed to avoid
environmental interaction with antennas
Sensitivity, Residual PIM -170 dBc (-127 dBm) @ 2x43 dBm -157
dBc (-137 dBm) @ 2x20 dBm (minimum) -147 dBc (-137 dBm) @ 2x10 dBm
(desired)
Networkability Run PIM test sets with multiple frequency bands
from one terminal Automatic download to test results to one
terminal
Ability to upload test point definition Preset test ID, test
powers, frequencies, pass levels Eliminate extra operator data
entry
-
Thank You!
-
JOIN OUR iBwave USERGROUP ON LINKEDIN
WE WILL BE POSTING ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS WE RECEIVE DURING
THE WEBINAR ON
Thank you! www.ibwave.com
PRESENTERS: Phillip Chan Marc Beranger John Beadles
www.rogers.com