Top Banner
PIA 2000 PIA 2000 Introduction to Public Affairs
55

PIA 2000

Jan 05, 2016

Download

Documents

tobias-fulton

PIA 2000. Introduction to Public Affairs. Decentralized Governance, NGOs and Civil Society. Week Eleven. Historical Patterns of Control: AT ISSUE is the Location of ultimate power Definition of Power: the authoritative allocation of values David Easton. Decentralized Governance. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: PIA  2000

PIA 2000PIA 2000Introduction to Public Affairs

Page 2: PIA  2000

Week ElevenWeek Eleven

 Decentralized Governance, NGOs and Civil Society

Page 3: PIA  2000

Decentralized Governance Decentralized Governance

Historical Patterns of Control: AT ISSUE is the Location of ultimate power

Definition of Power: the authoritative allocation of values

David Easton

Page 4: PIA  2000

Michel de Montaigne (1533-1592)Michel de Montaigne (1533-1592)

Page 5: PIA  2000

Fundamental IssueFundamental Issue

TYPES OF INTER-GOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Page 6: PIA  2000

  Confederation and loose Confederation and loose confederal relationshipsconfederal relationships

 Power lies with the sub-units U.S. Articles of Confederation

European Union

Mercesor

ASEAN

Southern African Development Council (SADC)

Economic Council of West African States (ECOWAS)

Page 7: PIA  2000

Articles of ConfederationArticles of Confederation

Page 8: PIA  2000

Federal RelationshipFederal Relationship

Some power lies with the National Unit Some power lies with lower units

Federalism Can transfer additional authority back

to the sub-units but not take power away from the federated governments

 

Page 9: PIA  2000

Federal Relationship TwoFederal Relationship Two

This is the key Distinction: 

1. Lower units cannot break away from the National Unit

2. National Unit cannot take power away from the lower units

Page 10: PIA  2000

Layer Cake vs. Marble CakeLayer Cake vs. Marble Cake

Iraq?

Page 11: PIA  2000

Federal Relationships ThreeFederal Relationships Three

Examples:

USAMexicoCanadaGermany - Federal RepublicNigeriaBrazilIndiaRussian FederationAustriaSwitzerland

Page 12: PIA  2000

Unitary SystemsUnitary Systems

All power ultimately lies at the national level

What power the local level has, is given to it by the national level

The power that the national unit has given to the local level can also be taken away from it

Page 13: PIA  2000
Page 14: PIA  2000

Unitary Systems TwoUnitary Systems Two

 Examples:

  United KingdomFranceDenmarkCosta RicaThailandKenyaIvory CoastSouth Africa? (Unitary or Quasi-

Federal)Hungary

Page 15: PIA  2000

DecentralizationDecentralization

Forms of Decentralization 

Concept: Transfer of authority to a lower level of government

 Primary Unit of Government: Lowest level that carries a bureaucracy with it

Subsidiarity- Transfer authority to the lowest level of government that can handle it (European Union)

  

Page 16: PIA  2000

““Subsidiarity” in Health CareSubsidiarity” in Health Care

Page 17: PIA  2000

Devolution:Devolution: Transfer to a non-Transfer to a non-Federal political bodyFederal political body

 

e.g. Budget and personnel authority to district, city and town councils (some times referred to as fiscal and administrative decentralization but really forms of devolution).

 Key- political power lies with lower level politicians

Lower levels have capacity to determine and implement their decisions

Page 18: PIA  2000

Proposed Devolution in U.K.Proposed Devolution in U.K.

Page 19: PIA  2000

DeconcentrationDeconcentration

Transfer of authority to administrators at lower level within the administrative system

 

Functional 

Integrated Prefectoral 

Unintegrated Prefectoral

Page 20: PIA  2000

Control SystemsControl Systems

Home Affairs Local Govt.

Council

Labor

DistrictLaborOffice

Education

District Ed.Office

Agriculture

District Ag.Office

Public Works

Public WorksOffice

Functional

Page 21: PIA  2000

Interior Local Govt. Public Works Agriculture Education Labor

Council/Chief

Prefectoral – Integrated: The Hourglass

DistrictOffice

DistrictLaborOffice

District Ed.Office

District Ag.Office

Public WorksOffice

Page 22: PIA  2000

Local Govt.

Council/Chief

Prefectoral - Unintegrated

Police

Police

Interior Labor

DistrictLaborOffice

Education

District Ed.Office

Agriculture

District Ag.Office

Public Works

Public WorksOffice

DistrictOffice

Page 23: PIA  2000

Colonial District CommissionerColonial District Commissioner

Page 24: PIA  2000

Other FormsOther Forms

  

Delegation - Public Corporations or parastatals (AMTRAK)

 Privatization

Program and Project Decentralization

Page 25: PIA  2000
Page 26: PIA  2000

Sectoral - By regular line or Sectoral - By regular line or agency within a Ministry agency within a Ministry

E.g. Focused activity - seed production (Green Revolution)

 Agricultural experiments

Education- No Child Left Behind

Page 27: PIA  2000

Use of Special UnitsUse of Special Units

Deconcentration or Transfer of authority to central level special unit

 E.g. Water, health or education projects or activities to subordinate admini-strative or council structures

 PAT Buses

Board of Education

Page 28: PIA  2000

PAT of Pittsburgh (Allegheny County)PAT of Pittsburgh (Allegheny County)

Page 29: PIA  2000

Inter-Ministerial/Departmental Inter-Ministerial/Departmental Committees or UnitsCommittees or Units

Sometimes called “Whole of Government” Approach

Obama’s Use of Task ForcesPlanning supervision

Overlapping committee memberships, e.g. Land Use Planning Committees

Page 30: PIA  2000

Whole of Government ApproachWhole of Government Approach

Page 31: PIA  2000

Field Level UnitsField Level Units

  

Creation of field level Special Project Units with semi-autonomous status

 E.g.A Range management project; or

 Integrated Rural Development - Most well known type of special project

Special designated geographical areas 

Multitude of project activity in different sectors that may overlap or compliment.

Page 32: PIA  2000

Extension ServicesExtension Services

Page 33: PIA  2000

Governance and Civil Society: Governance and Civil Society: A ReviewA Review

Networks of organizations, groups and individuals pursuing socio-economic interests

Page 34: PIA  2000

Various DefinitionsVarious Definitions

"Beyond the family but short of the state" (Hegel)

 "Human Rights, Basic Needs and the Stuff of Citizenship" (Anonymous)

 Issue- (First vs. Second and Third generation Human Rights and Civil Society)

Page 35: PIA  2000

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich HegelGeorg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel August 27, 1770 – November 14, 1831) August 27, 1770 – November 14, 1831)

Page 36: PIA  2000

Types of OrganizationsTypes of Organizations

The Nature of the Beast:

 

Non-Profits Not for Profits PVOs CBOs CSOs  

Civics (South Africa) Foundations Associations Interest Groups Quangos

Page 37: PIA  2000

United Democratic FrontUnited Democratic Front

Page 38: PIA  2000

Five CaveatsFive Caveats

 1. Usually excludes “for profits”- issue of contractors

 2. Both International and Local

 3. Internationals are not universally loved

 4. Very often internationals are religious or charity based

 5. Focus has been primarily on relief than development or civil society goals

Page 39: PIA  2000

Types of “Development” NGOsTypes of “Development” NGOs

 1. Philanthropy

 2. Relief and Welfare Societies

 3. Public Service Contractors

 4. Populist based development agencies (national)

 5. Grassroots associations (local or village based)

 6. Advocacy groups

 7. Public Service Contractors

Page 40: PIA  2000

Giving Fish or Teaching Giving Fish or Teaching FishingFishing

Page 41: PIA  2000

Traditional FocusTraditional Focus

 Disaster- Humanitarian Assistance 

War, Drought, Agricultural Failure

Focus on Rural Areas

Some Have partly shifted to Developments

Page 42: PIA  2000

Herbert Hoover's food relief efforts during World War Herbert Hoover's food relief efforts during World War “I saved between 15 and 20 million European children”“I saved between 15 and 20 million European children”

Page 43: PIA  2000

NGOs- Areas of perceived NGOs- Areas of perceived advantageadvantage  

   1. Links with poor 2. Image of populism 3. Cost-effective- small but efficient 4. Innovative 5. Staff loyalty and commitment

Page 44: PIA  2000
Page 45: PIA  2000

International Humanitarian NGOs- International Humanitarian NGOs- WeaknessesWeaknesses

  1. Lack of local legitimacy 2. Donor driven 3. Inefficiency 4. Amateurism- leadership and

continuity problems 5. Staffing problems 6. Self-serving- own

objectives: Faith Based

  7. Fixation on projects-

problems of replication 8. Lack of perceived

accountability 9. Learning problems/lack of

institutional memory 10.Tensions with government

institutions- Politically threatening

 11. Ties with existing local

elites 12. Inability of humanitarian

organizations to transfer to new development orientation

Page 46: PIA  2000

  

NGOs, Local Government, Civil NGOs, Local Government, Civil Society and Democracy: A ReviewSociety and Democracy: A Review

 1. Madison and Democracy: 

a. The problem with majorities 

b. Tyranny 

c. Factions

Page 47: PIA  2000

2. Direct Democracy vs. 2. Direct Democracy vs. Representative DemocracyRepresentative Democracy

  a. Populism b. Minority rights c. Shifting majorities d. Problem with Plebiscites

Page 48: PIA  2000

3. Polyarchy Needs3. Polyarchy Needs

  a. Interest Group Liberalism b. Problem of zero-sum game c. Civil Society as organizational not individual or

the mass d. The need for apathy e. Institutional structures: Checks and balances f. Constitutional vs. social stability

Page 49: PIA  2000

Where do we go from here?Where do we go from here?

Page 50: PIA  2000

4. Democracy focuses 4. Democracy focuses on:on:

a. Governance b. Local Government  c. Civil Society

 Unpaid Non-Political Advertisement:

PIA 2528- GOVERNANCE, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND CIVIL SOCIETY IN ASIA, LATIN AMERICA, EASTERN EUROPE AND AFRICA

Page 51: PIA  2000

Discussion of ReadingDiscussion of Reading

Bessie Head

William Riordon

Cameron Duodu

Page 52: PIA  2000

Next Week’s ReadingNext Week’s Reading

Stephen Kinzer, “Overthrow”

Picard and Moudoud, “Guinea”

Orwell, “Down and Out”

Page 53: PIA  2000

Eric Arthur Blair, (25 June 1903 – Eric Arthur Blair, (25 June 1903 – 21 January 1950)21 January 1950)

Page 54: PIA  2000

Ezzeddine Moudoud- Independent Public Policy Professional with World Bank

Ezzeddine Moudoud, Modernization, the State, and Regional Disparity in Developing Countries: Tunisia in Historical Perspective, 1881–1982 (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1988)

Page 55: PIA  2000

““For nearly three centuries For nearly three centuries the dominant fact in American the dominant fact in American life has been expansion.” life has been expansion.” Stephen KinzerStephen Kinzer