Top Banner
Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality Studies Anuradha Prakash Chapman University
21

Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

May 21, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality Studies

Anuradha Prakash

Chapman University

Page 2: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

•Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation

•Comparison to conventional treatments

• Effect of commercial treatment and distribution

Page 3: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

Protocol

Irradiated at 0 and 0.4 kGy at FTSI

Shipped to Chapman by refrigerated truck

Weight loss

Internal

disorder

development

Percentage

decay

Texture

Analyzed

using a

penetrometer

Sensory

Consumer testing with

untrained panels using

9 point hedonic scales

Quality tests performed at 1, 7, and 14 days following irradiation

Peaches shipped from GA/SC to FTSI

Chemical

pH, Titratable

Acidity, Brix

Peaches

Page 4: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

Consumers preferred Irradiated Peaches

4

a b b b ba a a a aa a a a aa a a a a0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

OverallAppearance

Overall Flavor Overall Texture Overall Juiciness Overall Liking

Day 7 Titan Control

Day 7 Titan Irradiated

Day 13 Titan Control

Day 13 Titan Irradiated

b aa a0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Day 7 Day 13

Titan Control

Titan Irradiated

9 Point Hedonics

Preference

n=57

n=47

Titan - Blaze Prince

Page 5: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

Ground shipment study: blueberries• Fresh Vaccinium ashei, Rabbiteye “Premier” blueberries harvested in

Georgia, June 2014

5

Retail display, ambient temperature

MeBr

15.56 °C and 32g/m3 for 3.5 hours

Forced air cooled to 1°C

Ground shipment to Gateway America, Gulfport, MS

Ground shipment to Chapman Univ, Orange, CA

Irradiation

Forced air cooled to 1°C

Ground shipment to Gateway America, Gulfport, MS

Gamma irradiation at 150 and 400 Gy

Ground shipment to Chapman Univ, Orange, CA

Page 6: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments
Page 7: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

MeBr 150 Gy 400 Gy MeBr 150 Gy 400 Gy MeBr 150 Gy 400 Gy

Day 1 Day 3 Day 5

% D

amag

e

Retail display

Good Berries Decay Softness Physical Defects

Page 8: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

MeBr 150 Gy 400 Gy

Day 8

Day 10

Day 12

California Retail Conditions

Page 9: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

Strawberry Air Shipment study

Transported to Chapman University

Stored overnight at 1°C

Insulated for air shipment

1 day

Unwrapped, retail display, ambient

temperature, 4 days

MeBr15.56 °C and

32g/m3 for 3.5 hours, Raymond

Express

Forced air cooled to 1°C

Irradiation Forced air cooled to 1°C

Transported to Sterigenics,

400 Gy

ControlForced air

cooled to 1°C

Freshly harvested strawberries ❖ Marquee:

June 2014, Santa Maria

❖ Amado: October and November 2014, Oxnard

Page 10: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

Packaging with astrofoil

Chapman University

Page 11: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

9am

10

am

11

am

12

pm

1p

m

2p

m

3p

m

4p

m

5p

m

11

pm

5am

11

am

5p

m

11

pm

5am

11

am

5p

m

11

pm

5am

11

am

5p

m

11

pm

5am

11

am

5p

m

11

pm

0 1 2 3 4

Air freight Control Air freight MeBr

Air freight Irradiated Refrigerated Control

Page 12: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

Texture

0

50

100

150

200

250

Day 2 Day 4

Forc

e (

N)

Refrigerated Control Air freight contriol Air freight irradiated Air freight MeBr

Page 13: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

Sensory

5.6

5.8

6

6.2

6.4

6.6

6.8

7

7.2

7.4

Appearance Flavor Texture Overall Liking

9-P

t. H

ed

on

ic S

cale

Marquee (trial 2) strawberries

Trial 4 Refrigerated control Trial 4 Air freight irardiated

Trial 4 Air freight MeBr Trial 4 Air freight control

Page 14: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Air Freight Control Air FreightIrradiation

Air Freight MethylBromide

% o

f D

amag

e

Marquee Strawberries Trial 1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Air Freight Control Air FreightIrradiation

Air Freight MethylBromide

% o

f D

amag

e

Amado Strawberries Trial 1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Air Freight Control Air FreightIrradiation

Air Freight MethylBromide

% o

f D

amag

e

Marquee Strawberries Trial 2

wet leaky

dry bruise

mold/decay

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Air Freight Control Air FreightIrradiation

Air Freight MethylBromide

% o

f D

mag

e

Amado Strawberries Trial 2

wet leaky

dry bruise

mold/decay

Page 15: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

Control MeBr Irradiation

Amado

Marquee

Day 4 ambient temperature display

Page 16: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

Control 150 Gy

1000 Gy400 Gy

Seedless Kishu Mandarins

Page 17: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

Control

150 Gy

1000 Gy

Chandler Pummelos

Page 18: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments
Page 19: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

Future Studies

19

Peaches

Harvest Immature

Irradiate immediately

Quality, Sensory and shelf life testing

Store at ideal temperatures

Store at commercial and/or home refrigeration temperatures

Irradiate after delay

Quality, Sensory and shelf life testing

Harvest at more mature stage

Irradiate immediately

Quality, Sensory and shelf life testing

Page 20: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

Considerations

• Harvest times• How many varieties?• Maturity at harvest• Other qualifiers-size, color• How is the fruit packed?• Where is the product exported to?• How long does it take?

• Shipping conditions

• Storage conditions• Storage life• How is quality measured?

Page 21: Phytosanitary Irradiation Quality StudiesAnuradha Prakash Chapman University •Dose response studies to determine tolerance of fruit to irradiation •Comparison to conventional treatments

Acknowledgments

• Heather Mcdonald• Karina Rodriguez• Akanksha Jain• Tamar Serapian• Dr. Jose de Jesus Ornelas Paz•

• USDA-APHIS• Titan Farms• Lane Southern Orchards• Georgia and South Carolina Peach Council• FTSI • Naturipe• Gateway America• Sterigenics