Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747 Phytoplankton assemblages in the Gerlache and Bransfield Straits (Antarctic Peninsula) determined by light microscopy and CHEMTAX analysis of HPLC pigment data Francisco Rodriguez a , Manuel Varela b , Manuel Zapata a,c, * a Centro de Investigacions Mari * nas, Conselleria de Pesca, Xunta de Galicia, Apdo 13, E 36620 Vilanova de Arousa, Spain b Instituto Espa * nol de Oceanograf ! ıa, Muelle de Animas s/n. Apdo. 130, E 15080 A Coru * na, Spain c Departamento de Biolox! ıa Vexetal e Ciencia do Solo, Universidade de Vigo, Campus Lagoas-Marcosende, E 36200 Vigo, Spain Received 29 October 1999; received in revised form 25 October 2000; accepted 6 March 2001 Abstract The distribution and composition of phytoplankton assemblages were studied in the Gerlache and Bransfield Straits (Antarctic Peninsula) during the FRUELA 95 (December 1995) and FRUELA 96 (January 1996) cruises, using light microscopy and HPLC pigment analysis. Based on phytoplankton size and composition, two regions could be distinguished. The first region embraced the southwestern part of the Gerlache Strait, including a frontal system in the northeastern area. Chlorophyll (Chl) a values were generally high in surface waters (from 3.5 to 26.2 mgl 1 ). Phytoplankton assemblages in the stratified waters of the southwestern Gerlache Strait were dominated by large diatoms and the flagellate Pyramimonas sp. (mixed with Phaeocystis in FRUELA 95). Pigment patterns included Chl a, Chl b, different Chls c, and fucoxanthin as the major carotenoid. The frontal zone was characterized by a bloom of Pyramimonas. Following a transect from southwestern Gerlache Strait towards the Bransfield Strait an increased contribution of Chl b, violaxanthin, and two unknown carotenoids (tentatively identified as loroxanthin and loroxanthin-ester) was observed which paralleled the Pyramimonas distribution. The marker pigment lutein, usually associated with chlorophytes and prasinoxanthin-lacking prasinophyceans, was only detected at very low concentrations. The second region, embracing the Bransfield Strait and one station in the Drake Passage, was characterized by stratified waters and low Chl a concentration (from 0.18 to 3.88 mgl 1 ). Phytoplankton assemblages were dominated by the nanoplankter Cryptomonas sp. (FRUELA 95), the colonial haptophyte Phaeocystis cf. antarctica, and small flagellates (FRUELA 96). Pigment composition was mainly constituted by Chl a, Chl c 2 , Chl c 3 , alloxanthin, fucoxanthin, 19 0 -butanoyloxyfucoxanthin, and 19 0 -hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin. HPLC pigment data were processed using a factorization matrix program (CHEMTAX) to estimate the contribution of different algal classes to total Chl a. Four ‘algal groups’ were included in the chemotaxonomic approach: ‘diatoms’, ‘Phaeocystis’, ‘cryptophytes’, and ‘Pyramimonas’. A fifth ‘chemotaxonomic group’ was defined to reconstruct the distribution of an assemblage consisting of autotrophic peridinin-lacking dinoflagellates, some haptophytes, and chrysophytes, which were probably included by cell counting into the single group of ‘small flagellates’. The distribution patterns of the CHEMTAX groups were in agreement with cell counts of diatoms, cryptophytes, and Pyramimonas. Discrepancies were observed for P. cf. *Corresponding author. Centro de Investigacions Mari * nas, Conselleria de Pesca, Xunta de Galicia, Apdo 13, E 36620 Vilanova de Arousa, Spain. E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Zapata). 0967-0645/01/$ - see front matter r 2001 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. PII:S0967-0645(01)00121-7
25
Embed
Phytoplankton assemblages in the Gerlache and Bransfield ...s3.amazonaws.com/publicationslist.org/data/f... · Phytoplankton assemblages in the Gerlache and Bransfield Straits (Antarctic
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747
Phytoplankton assemblages in the Gerlache and BransfieldStraits (Antarctic Peninsula) determined by light microscopy
and CHEMTAX analysis of HPLC pigment data
Francisco Rodrigueza, Manuel Varelab, Manuel Zapataa,c,*a Centro de Investigacions Mari *nas, Conselleria de Pesca, Xunta de Galicia, Apdo 13, E 36620 Vilanova de Arousa, Spain
b Instituto Espa *nol de Oceanograf!ıa, Muelle de Animas s/n. Apdo. 130, E 15080 A Coru *na, Spainc Departamento de Biolox!ıa Vexetal e Ciencia do Solo, Universidade de Vigo, Campus Lagoas-Marcosende, E 36200 Vigo, Spain
Received 29 October 1999; received in revised form 25 October 2000; accepted 6 March 2001
Abstract
The distribution and composition of phytoplankton assemblages were studied in the Gerlache and Bransfield Straits(Antarctic Peninsula) during the FRUELA 95 (December 1995) and FRUELA 96 (January 1996) cruises, using lightmicroscopy and HPLC pigment analysis. Based on phytoplankton size and composition, two regions could be
distinguished. The first region embraced the southwestern part of the Gerlache Strait, including a frontal system in thenortheastern area. Chlorophyll (Chl) a values were generally high in surface waters (from 3.5 to 26.2 mg l�1).Phytoplankton assemblages in the stratified waters of the southwestern Gerlache Strait were dominated by large
diatoms and the flagellate Pyramimonas sp. (mixed with Phaeocystis in FRUELA 95). Pigment patterns included Chl a,Chl b, different Chls c, and fucoxanthin as the major carotenoid. The frontal zone was characterized by a bloom ofPyramimonas. Following a transect from southwestern Gerlache Strait towards the Bransfield Strait an increased
contribution of Chl b, violaxanthin, and two unknown carotenoids (tentatively identified as loroxanthin andloroxanthin-ester) was observed which paralleled the Pyramimonas distribution. The marker pigment lutein, usuallyassociated with chlorophytes and prasinoxanthin-lacking prasinophyceans, was only detected at very lowconcentrations. The second region, embracing the Bransfield Strait and one station in the Drake Passage, was
characterized by stratified waters and low Chl a concentration (from 0.18 to 3.88 mg l�1). Phytoplankton assemblageswere dominated by the nanoplankter Cryptomonas sp. (FRUELA 95), the colonial haptophyte Phaeocystis cf.antarctica, and small flagellates (FRUELA 96). Pigment composition was mainly constituted by Chl a, Chl c2, Chl c3,
alloxanthin, fucoxanthin, 190-butanoyloxyfucoxanthin, and 190-hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin. HPLC pigment data wereprocessed using a factorization matrix program (CHEMTAX) to estimate the contribution of different algal classes tototal Chl a. Four ‘algal groups’ were included in the chemotaxonomic approach: ‘diatoms’, ‘Phaeocystis’, ‘cryptophytes’,
and ‘Pyramimonas’. A fifth ‘chemotaxonomic group’ was defined to reconstruct the distribution of an assemblageconsisting of autotrophic peridinin-lacking dinoflagellates, some haptophytes, and chrysophytes, which were probablyincluded by cell counting into the single group of ‘small flagellates’. The distribution patterns of the CHEMTAX groupswere in agreement with cell counts of diatoms, cryptophytes, and Pyramimonas. Discrepancies were observed for P. cf.
*Corresponding author. Centro de Investigacions Mari *nas, Conselleria de Pesca, Xunta de Galicia, Apdo 13, E 36620 Vilanova de
0967-0645/01/$ - see front matter r 2001 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
PII: S 0 9 6 7 - 0 6 4 5 ( 0 1 ) 0 0 1 2 1 - 7
antarctica as well as for small flagellates and dinoflagellates. Significant positive correlations were found between
phytoplankton cell counts and different Chls c, suggesting the chemotaxonomic usefulness of Chls c as marker pigmentsfor phytoplankton groups in addition to carotenoids. r 2001 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
1. Introduction
The phytoplankton composition in coastal andfrontal regions of Antarctic waters has beendescribed as a nano- and picoplankton-sizedcommunity (Azam et al., 1991; Hewes et al.,1990; Smetacek et al., 1990) on which blooms ofdiatoms (Bodungen et al., 1986; Detmer andBathmann, 1997), haptophytes (Phaeocystis ant-arctica; Baumann et al., 1994), prasinophyceans(Pyramimonas sp.; Bird and Karl, 1991), andcryptophytes (Cryptomonas sp.; Vernet, 1992) areoccasionally superimposed.
Bloom formation is generally associated withthe stabilization of the upper mixed layer (UML)by melting from receding ice edges (Bodungenet al., 1986; Holm-Hansen et al., 1989) in shelfwaters and marginal ice zones (MIZ), as occurs inthe Gerlache and Bransfield Straits. Algal bloomsalso have been reported either associated with iceformation in the southern Weddell Sea (Sakshaug,1989; Smetacek et al., 1992) or with frontalstructures like those found in Bransfield Strait(Mura and Agust!ı, 1998).
The small-sized phytoplankton in the SouthernOcean hampers the light microscopy identificationand counting because these organisms usually lacktaxonomically useful morphological features. Inaddition, many species are very fragile and do notsurvive sample fixation (Gieskes and Kraay, 1983;Simon et al., 1994). To overcome some of theseproblems, a chemotaxonomic approach based onchromatographic pigment analysis of taxon-speci-fic marker pigments has been employed todistinguish the main algal classes. Pioneeringapplications (Jeffrey, 1976; Jeffrey and Hallegraeff,1980) were based on thin-layer chromatography(TLC); since mid-1980s, the preferred method hasbeen HPLC (Barlow et al., 1993; Bidigare et al.,1990; Gieskes and Kraay, 1986; Goericke andRepeta, 1993; Letelier et al., 1993; Wright et al.,1996). Previous studies of phytoplankton pigmentdistributions in the Southern Ocean have revealed
that taxonomical groups such as haptophytes(Barlow et al., 1998; Buma et al., 1990), greenalgae (Peeken, 1997; Prezelin et al., 1992), andcryptophytes (Buma et al., 1992; Vernet, 1992)were important components in austral spring andsummer blooms.
The use of HPLC for estimating the quantitativecontribution of different phytoplankton groups tototal chlorophyll (Chl) a, using marker pigments,has attracted much attention in recent years(Andersen et al., 1996; Gieskes et al., 1988; Letelieret al., 1993; Wright et al., 1996). However, ideally,the distribution of microalgal groups inferred frommarker pigments should be carefully contrastedwith microscopy (or flow cytometry) observationsbecause some carotenoids and chlorophylls areshared among different algal classes (Jeffrey et al.,1999). Divinyl (DV) Chl a and alloxanthin arespecific marker pigments for Prochlorococcusmarinus and cryptophytes; however, the abun-dance of diatoms and haptophytes, estimated fromfucoxanthin and 190-hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin, re-spectively, may be prone to error because otheralgal classes (chrysophytes, dinoflagellates, etc.)contribute to these carotenoid pools. Moreover,pigment composition and pigment ratios areinfluenced by environmental factors (Geider et al.,1993; Goericke and Montoya, 1998; van Leeuweand Stefels, 1998). Pigment distribution can behighly variable between members of a single class(Simon et al., 1994; Zapata and Garrido, 1997),and even between strains from a single species (e.g.Phaeocystis, Bidigare et al. (1996) and Vaulot et al.(1994), or Emiliania huxleyi, Garrido and Zapata(1998)). All these statements must be borne inmind when interpreting the relative abundance ofphytoplankton classes from pigment concentra-tions.
To date, the most suitable approach for HPLCpigment data interpretation is that achieved by thematrix factorization program CHEMTAX (Mack-ey et al., 1996). This mathematical techniquecalculates the relative abundance of algal classes
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747724
based on initial guesses of pigment ratios for eachclass. Its application to field samples in differentoceanic regions (Higgins and Mackey, 2000;Mackey et al., 1998; Wright et al., 1996; Wrightand van den Enden, 2000), coastal waters (Pinck-ney et al., 1998), and several lakes (Descy et al.,2000) has shown a sound capability to reconstructdistributions of several algal classes, and evendifferent pigment types from a single class (Wrightet al., 1996; Wright and van den Enden, 2000).
HPLC methods usually employed in marineresearch cannot resolve the diverse array of Chl cpigments potentially present in natural samples(Jeffrey et al., 1999). The incorporation of Chls cto the chemotaxonomic analysis of phytoplanktoncould be very useful to improve the description ofphytoplankton assemblages obtained from theCHEMTAX program, which is mainly based oncarotenoids.
The scope of this study was to describe thespatial distribution of phytoplankton assemblagesand compare the results obtained using twotechniques: first, the classical method of cellcounting by light microscopy, and second, thechemotaxonomic approach based on HPLC pig-ment analysis and CHEMTAX processing ofpigment data. The pigment data presented herewere obtained using a new HPLC method, able toseparate most taxon-specific carotenoids andchlorophylls (specially Chl c pigments) frommarine phytoplankton (Zapata et al., 2000).
Cell counts and pigment analysis provided agood agreement with the distribution patterns formicroplankton (diatoms), and some nanoplank-ton-sized algae (Pyramimonas sp., Cryptomonassp.). In samples having low Chl a, the chemotaxo-nomic approach allowed the detection of markerpigments associated with small-sized cryptophytes,haptophytes, and chrysophytes grouped as ‘smallflagellates’ by light microscopy.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Sample collection
Phytoplankton samples were collected at 11stations in the Gerlache and Bransfield Straits
(Eastern area of the Bellingshausen Sea) during theFRUELA 95 (December 1995) and FRUELA 96(January 1996) cruises on board R.V. Hesp !erides(Fig. 1). Samples were taken from CTD-castsusing 12-l PVC Niskin bottles, at depths of 5, 10,20, 40, and 60 m. For HPLC pigment analysisseawater samples (490–2000 ml) were filtered ontoWhatman GFF filters (47 mm diameter) and keptfrozen until pigment analysis.
2.2. Phytoplankton counting
Aliquots of 125 ml were preserved with Lugol’ssolution in plastic bottles (Margalef, 1974). Sam-ples were kept in dark and cool (41C) conditionsuntil cell counting. Phytoplankton cells wereenumerated using the inverted microscope proce-dures described by Utherm .ohl (1958). Samplevolumes of 10–50 ml were allowed to settle for24–48 h, depending on the expected abundance ofcells as estimated from Chl a concentrations. ANikon Diaphot TMD inverted microscope withNomarski system was used. The whole bottomchamber was examined at 40� to enumeratelarger and less frequent microplankters, then,100� , 200� , 400� , and 1000� for identifyingand counting smaller organisms.
When possible, the cells were identified tospecies level, but many of the observed formshad to be placed into taxonomic categories such assmall flagellates. In this group were includedorganisms from different algal classes: Prasino-phyceae, Prymnesiophyceae, Cryptophyceae(other than Cryptomonas sp.), and Chlorophyceae.
2.3. HPLC pigment analysis
Frozen filters were extracted in 5 ml of 95%methanol using a spatula for filter grinding andfurther sonication during 5 min at low temperature(B51C). Extracts were then filtered throughWhatman GFF filters to remove cell and filterdebris. An aliquot (1 ml) of methanol extract wasmixed with 0.4 ml of water to avoid peak distor-tion (Zapata and Garrido, 1991). Each sample wasinjected just after the water addition as a decreasein non-polar pigment concentrations was observedwhen diluted extracts were kept waiting for
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747 725
injection inside the refrigerated autosampler (Za-pata et al., 2000). A volume of 200 ml was injectedinto a Waters Alliance HPLC System consisting ofa 2690 separations module, a Waters 996 photo-diode array detector interfaced with a Waters 474scanning fluorescence detector by a Sat/in analoginterface.
Pigment separation was performed by HPLCaccording to Zapata et al. (2000). The stationaryphase was a C8 column (Symmetry 150� 4.6 mm,3.5 mm particle size, 100 (A pore size) thermostatedat 251C by means of a refrigerated circulatorywater bath. Mobile phases were: A: methanol : a-cetonitrile : aqueous pyridine solution (0.25 M pyr-idine, pH adjusted to 5.0 with acetic acid)
(50 : 25 : 25 v/v/v), and B: acetonitrile : acetone(80 : 20 v/v). A linear gradient from 0% to 40%B was pumped for 22 min, followed by an increaseto 100% at minute 26 and isocratic hold at 100%B for a further 12 min. Initial conditions werereestablished by reversed linear gradient. Flow ratewas 1 ml min�1.
Chlorophylls and carotenoids were detected bydiode-array spectroscopy (350–750 nm). Chloro-phylls were also detected by fluorescence (Ex[excitation]: 440 nm, Em [emission]: 650 nm). Pig-ments were identified by co-chromatography withauthentic standards and by diode-array spectro-scopy (wavelength range: 350–750 nm, 1.2 nmspectral resolution). Each peak was checked for
Fig. 1. Area of study and station locations for FRUELA 95 and 96 cruises.
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747726
spectral homogeneity using the Millennium soft-ware (Waters) algorithms, and the absorptionspectrum was compared with a spectral librarypreviously created. Pigments were quantified usingexternal standards and extinction coefficientscompiled by Jeffrey (1997).
2.4. CHEMTAX analysis of pigment data
The contributions of phytoplankton classes (orphytoplankton pigment groups) to the total Chl aconcentration were obtained using CHEMTAXsoftware running under MATLABt. The basis ofcalculations and procedures used are fully de-scribed in Mackey et al. (1996).
The initial pigment-ratio matrix (Table 1) was amodification of that reported by Mackey et al.(1996). Additional pigments, members of the Chl cfamily, were added to the initial ratio matrix: Chl
c1, Chl c2, Chl c3 as well as the non-polar Chl cwhose molecular structure has been recentlydescribed in E. huxleyi (Garrido et al., 2000) as aChl c2 moiety esterified to a monogalactosyldia-cylglyceride (Chl c2-MGDG). Pigment ratios fromPhaeocystis sp. strains isolated from Antarcticwaters (Culture Collection of Australian AntarcticDivision, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia), wereused for estimating the ‘Phaeocystis’ distribution.The absence of peridinin (the marker pigment forautotrophic dinoflagellates), even in samples wheredinoflagellates were detected by microscopy, pre-cluded the evaluation of the contribution ofperidinin-containing dinoflagellates to total Chla. A ‘chemotaxonomic group’ with a pigmentsignature including Chl c3, Chl c2, fucoxanthin(Fuco), 190-butanoyloxyfucoxanthin (But-fuco),and 190-hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin (Hex-fuco) wascreated to describe a pigment group that could
Table 1
Peak identification, retention times, and spectral absorbance maxima of phytoplankton pigments detected in seawater samples from
cruises FRUELA 95 and 96
No. Pigment Retention time (min) Maxima in eluant (nm)
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747 727
account for the contribution of peridinin-lackingautotrophic dinoflagellates such as Gymnodiniumgalatheanum (Johnsen and Sakshaug, 1993) or G.breve (Zapata et al., 1998), and other algal groupswhose pigment composition has not yet beenexhaustively analyzed (e.g. Parmales, Chrysophy-ta). In the optical microscopy observations manyof these organisms would be included into the‘small flagellates’ group.
A culture of the prasinophycean algae Pyrami-monas gelidicola (CS-129), isolated from Antarcticwaters (CSIRO Algal Culture Collection, Tasma-nia, Australia) was studied to compare its pigmentpattern with natural samples where Pyramimonassp. was dominant.
3. Results
3.1. A brief description of oceanographic featuresfrom the study area
Physico-chemical gradients during the FRUE-LA cruises have been presented and discussed byCastro et al. (2002), Garc!ıa et al. (2002), and
Rodr!ıguez et al. (2002). Relevant hydrographicfeatures were (i) the stratified water column foundat both ends of the Gerlache Strait and (ii) thevertical mixed central region (Rodr!ıguez et al.,2002) located in Scholaert Channel (St. 184)during FRUELA 95. The southwestern part ofthe Gerlache Strait was characterized by an upperlayer of cold and low salinity water from meltingice, whereas the northeastern part showed awarmer and saltier surface layer (Fig. 2 fromRodr!ıguez et al., 2002). A frontal region locatedbetween the mixed waters and the northeasternstratified side of the Gerlache Strait (Rodr!ıguezet al., 2002) bounded different phytoplanktonassemblages.
3.2. Spatial distribution of phytoplanktonassemblages
3.2.1. Phytoplankton composition during theFRUELA 95 cruise
According to the phytoplankton distributionobtained by light microscopy, two regions couldbe distinguished in the study area: (i) from thesouthwestern end to the middle of the Gerlache
Fig. 2. Temperature (1C) and salinity (psu) distribution along FRUELA 95 cruise.
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747728
Strait (Sts. 169–184) and (ii) Bransfield Strait (Sts.178 and 168). Fig. 3 shows cell counts of distinctalgal groups in both regions, separated by thefrontal region (St. 184).
The phytoplankton assemblages in the firstregion were characterized by Pyramimonas sp.,chain-forming diatoms Eucampia antarctica, Chae-toceros socialis and Odontella weissflogii, and P. cf.antarctica (Fig. 3). The frontal region showed a
surface bloom of Pyramimonas sp. (1.90�103 cells ml�1 at 2 m depth), and high numbers ofsmall flagellates (9.53� 103 cells ml�1).
The second region was characterized by anincrease in the relative abundance of nanoplank-ton-sized organisms (2–20 mm). At St. 178, thesurface populations were dominated by the cryp-tophyte Cryptomonas sp. (6.36� 103 cells ml�1)and small flagellates (9.1� 103 cells ml�1), with
Fig. 3. Abundance of phytoplankton groups (cells ml�1) during FRUELA 95 cruise: (a) Pyramimonas gelidicola (Prasinophyceae), (b)
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747 729
highest abundance of dinoflagellates at surfacewaters (400 cells ml�1). At St. 168 located inBransfield Strait high numbers of Cryptomonassp. were observed in the upper 40 m depth,together with a surface maximum of P. cf.antarctica (707 cells ml�1).
3.2.2. Phytoplankton composition during theFRUELA 96 cruise
Stations sampled during FRUELA 96 were notdistributed along a linear section, and the resultshave been plotted as individual stations in eacharea (Gerlache Strait, Bransfield Strait, and DrakePassage, Fig. 4). Diatoms and Pyramimonas sp.were dominant in the Gerlache Strait (Fig. 4, Sts.226, 227, 225), whereas nanoplankton-sized phy-toplankters (e.g. flagellated forms of P. cf.antarctica) were dominant in the Bransfield Straitand Drake Passage (Fig. 4, Sts. 224 and 223). Inthe Gerlache Strait (Sts. 226 and 227), diatoms likeEucampia antarctica, Odontella weissflogii, and C.socialis constituted the main component of themicroplankton and showed a surface distributionrestricted to the upper 20 m depth. The mainfeature was again a surface bloom of Pyramimonaslocated at NE Gerlache Strait (St. 225), withdensities up to 1.73� 103 cells ml�1, similar tothose observed in the previous cruise. In this areaand in the Drake Passage (St. 223), the phyto-plankton biomass was lower than in the FRUELA95 cruise. In the Bransfield Strait (St. 224),Cryptomonas sp. (dominant during FRUELA 95)was substituted by Phaeocystis populations,mainly free cells, and large diatoms.
3.3. Spatial distribution of phytoplankton pigments
3.3.1. HPLC pigment patterns during theFRUELA 95 cruise
Based on the obtained chromatograms (Fig. 5)we distinguished four pigment patterns linked tothe pigment (Figs. 6 and 7) and phytoplanktondistributions observed in the study area.
The first two pigment patterns (Fig. 5a and b)occurred in the southwestern Gerlache Strait andthe frontal region (Sts. 169–184); both werecharacterized by high Chl concentrations, particu-larly the second one, corresponding to the
Pyramimonas bloom (20 mg Chl a l�1 and 12.6 mgChl b l�1, Fig. 4a and b). The first pigment patternwas mainly contributed by diatoms and somePyramimonas in the southwestern Gerlache Strait(Sts. 169–177). Chl c3, Chl c2, and Chl c1 were themajor Chl c pigments (Fig. 6), and Fuco thedominant carotenoid (Fig. 7). In particular, Chlc2 and Chl c1 attained their highest concentrations(1.23 mg Chl c2 l�1 and 0.135 mg Chl c1 l�1) at thesouthern boundary of the frontal region (St. 177,Fig. 6). The lack of cell counts at St. 177 precludesthe comparison with phytoplankton pigments, butthe subsequent CHEMTAX analysis of pigmentdata noticed a diatom maximum at this station.Minor contributions by haptophytes were alsodetected at Sts. 169 and 177, where a maximum ofthe Chl c2-MGDG (Fig. 6) was associated withChl c3 and Hex-fuco, corresponding with highabundance of P. cf. antarctica. Chl c3 registered asecond maximum at St. 184 (0.160 mg Chl c3 l�1)associated with Fuco as the major carotenoid anda maximum of small flagellates.
The second pigment pattern was observed inassociation with the Pyramimonas sp. bloom in thefrontal region of Gerlache Strait (Fig. 5b). Chl bwas the dominant accessory chlorophyll togetherwith the highest concentrations detected of violax-anthin (Viola) and two unknown carotenoids(Table 2, peaks 10 and 18). The first unknowncarotenoid practically coeluted with 90-cis-neox-anthin (Neo) in our HPLC system, and bothpigments were highly correlated to Chl b (peak 10,r ¼ 0:93; Po0:001; n ¼ 30; and peak 18, r ¼ 0:94;Po0:001; n ¼ 30).
The second pigment pattern was compared withthat obtained for the prasinophycean P. gelidicola(CS-139) using the method of Wright et al. (1991).The resulting chromatogram showed a carotenoidpool constituted by Neo, Viola, and two unknowncarotenoids as major peaks, with minor contribu-tion of lutein (Lut). The first unknown wasspectrally similar to the unknown peak 10 (Table2), and considering its retention time and spectralcharacteristics was tentatively identified as lorox-anthin (Loro). This pigment has been previouslyreported in several members of green algae likeChlorophyceae, Micromonadophyceae (Prasino-phyceae), Ulvophyceae (see Fawley, 1991), as well
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747730
Fig. 4. Abundance of phytoplankton groups (cells ml�1) during FRUELA 96 cruise: Sts. 226, 227, 225, 224, 223.
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747 731
Fig. 5. Selected HPLC chromatograms showing pigment patterns associated to the main phytoplankton assemblages during
FRUELA 95 cruise: (a) diatoms–Pyramimonas gelidicola at SW Gerlache Strait (FRUELA 95); (b) Pyramimonas gelidicola bloom at
the frontal zone between Gerlache and Bransfield Straits (FRUELA 95); (c) Phaeocystis antarctica–Cryptomonas sp. at NE Gerlache
Strait (FRUELA 95); and (d) Cryptomonas sp. at Bransfield Strait (FRUELA 95). Peak identifications are as in Table 1.
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747732
Fig. 6. Concentrations of chlorophylls from FRUELA 95 cruise: (a) Chl a, (b) Chl b, (c) Chl c2 (mg l�1), and (d) Chl c1, (e) Chl c3, (f)
MgDVP, and (g) Chl c2-MGDG (ng l�1).
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747 733
as in Pyramimonas parkeae (Kohata and Wata-nabe, 1989), although Loro was not detected inother five species of Pyramimonas (Brown andJeffrey, 1992; Egeland et al., 1997). The secondunknown carotenoid from P. gelidicola (CS-139)showed similar retention and spectral character-istics to the unknown peak 18 (Table 1). Both thespectral similarity with respect to Loro and its
higher retention time are consistent with aloroxanthin-ester previously described in Pyrami-monas parkeae (Kohata and Watanabe, 1989).
A third pigment pattern (Fig. 5c), contributedby Phaeocystis cf. antarctica and Cryptomonas sp.(minor groups as e.g. dinoflagellates and chryso-phytes), was observed at Bransfield Strait (St. 178).This pigment pattern showed lower pigment
Fig. 7. Concentrations of carotenoids from FRUELA 95 cruise: (a) fucoxanthin (mg l�1), and (b) 190-butanoyloxyfucoxanthin, (c) 190-
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747734
concentrations and was constituted by Chl c2, Chlc3, Chl c2-MGDG, and the carotenoids But-fuco,Hex-fuco, and Allo as major compounds.
A fourth pigment pattern (Fig. 5d) dominatedby cryptophytes was distinguished at St. 178 andspecially at St. 168 located in the Bransfield Strait.Changes in vertical pigment distribution wereobserved at St. 178, with a cryptophyte pigmentpattern in the surface layer, and Chl c3, But-fuco,and Hex-fuco at deeper samples. However, singlecells (or colonies) of P. cf. antarctica were onlydetected by microscopy for samples at 5 m depth.At St. 168, the Cryptomonas species pigmentprofile was dominant throughout the sampledwater column (up to 60 m).
3.3.2. HPLC pigment patterns during theFRUELA 96 cruise
Four pigment patterns (Fig. 8) were distin-guished in association with the dominant phyto-plankton assemblages present in the study area.The first pigment pattern (Fig. 8a) was mainlycontributed by diatoms in the southwesternGerlache Strait (Sts. 226 and 227), characterizedby Chls c2 and c1 (Fig. 9), and Fuco (Fig. 10) asthe major carotenoid. The relationship betweendiatom numbers and these marker pigments wasconfirmed by significant correlation (Chl c1, r ¼0:77; Po0:001; n ¼ 50; Chl c2, r ¼ 0:80; Po0:001;n ¼ 50; Fuco, r ¼ 0:89; Po0:001; n ¼ 50).
The second pigment pattern (Fig. 8b) wasobserved in the frontal region in the GerlacheStrait and the Bransfield Strait confluence, asso-ciated with the Pyramimonas bloom. The highestconcentrations of Chl a (26.1 mg l�1) and Chl b(21.2 mg l�1) found during the study (Fig. 9) werereported during this event.
The third pigment pattern (Fig. 8c) was ob-served in the Bransfield Strait (St. 224) and DrakePassage (St. 223); it was characterized by low Chl aconcentrations (o1.0 mg l�1) associated with P.antarctica and small flagellates. The major chlor-ophylls were Chl a, Chl c2, Chl c3, and Chl c2-MGDG, and the dominant carotenoids wereFuco, But-fuco, and Hex-fuco (Fig. 10). Chl band Allo were only detected at St. 224. Phaeocystiscounts showed a significant correlation with theChl c2-MGDG (r ¼ 0:47; Po0:001; n ¼ 50) andHex-fuco (r ¼ 0:47; Po0:001; n ¼ 50). Unidenti-fied small flagellates were significantly correlatedwith Chl c3 (r ¼ 0:47; Po0:001; n ¼ 50) and Allo(r ¼ 0:42; Po0:001; n ¼ 50), the latter showingthat some cryptophytes were probably includedinto this group by light microscopy.
A fourth pigment pattern observed at St. 223,located further north in the Drake Passage, wascharacterized by Chl c3, Chl c2, Fuco, But-fuco,and Hex-fuco. Small flagellates were the dominantgroup as identified by cell counts, and the lack ofChl c2-MGDG distinguished this pigment pattern
Table 2
Initial pigment ratios and calculated pigment ratios for FRUELA 95 and 96 cruises analyzed by CHEMTAX
Chl c3 Chl c2 Chl c1 Fuco But-fuco Hex-fuco Allo Viola Chl b Chl c2-MGDG
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747 735
Fig. 8. Selected HPLC chromatograms showing pigment patterns associated to the main phytoplankton assemblages during
FRUELA 96 cruise: (a) diatoms at SW Gerlache Strait (FRUELA 95); (b) Pyramimonas gelidicola bloom at the frontal zone in
Bransfield Strait; (c) P. antarctica in Bransfield Strait, and (d) microflagellates at Drake Passage (FRUELA 96). Peak identifications
are as in Table 1.
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747736
Fig. 9. Concentrations of chlorophylls from FRUELA 96 cruise: (a) St. 226, (b) St. 225, and (c) St. 223.
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747 737
from that observed in samples with P. cf.antarctica.
3.3.3. Interpretation of HPLC pigment data byCHEMTAX program
The initial pigment-ratio matrix and the finalpigment ratios resulting from the fitting procedureare shown in Table 1. Initial and calculatedpigment ratios were almost identical for ‘Pyrami-monas’, ‘cryptophytes’, and ‘Phaeocystis’, whilelarger differences were observed in the case of‘diatoms’ and the ‘chemotaxonomic group’.
3.3.4. FRUELA 95 cruiseThe CHEMTAX-derived distribution of phyto-
plankton groups during FRUELA 95 (Fig. 11)showed mixed populations of ‘diatoms’ and‘Pyramimonas’ at Gerlache Strait, with a minorcontribution of ‘chemotaxonomic group’ and‘Phaeocystis’. The highest values of Chl a attrib-uted to ‘diatoms’ and ‘Phaeocystis’ were obtainedat St. 177, but could not be contrasted with cellcounts due to the lack of data for this station.
CHEMTAX results in the frontal region (St.184) reported high values of ‘Pyramimonas’ andalso a maximum for the ‘chemotaxonomic group’.The distribution of the ‘chemotaxonomic group’was similar to that of Chl c3, showing its highestvalues at surface waters in the Gerlache Straitduring the FRUELA 95 cruise, coinciding with asmall flagellate maximum at St. 184.
In the Bransfield Strait zone, phytoplankton wasdominated by mixed populations of ‘cryptophytes’and ‘Phaeocystis’, resembling the distributionpattern based on cell counts (Fig. 3).
3.3.5. FRUELA 96 cruiseA similar taxonomical segregation associated
with the hydrographical conditions was observed(Fig. 12): ‘diatoms’ were mainly restricted to theGerlache Strait (Sts. 226 and 225), while ‘chemo-taxonomic group’, ‘cryptophytes’, and ‘Phaeocystis’were dominant in the Bransfield Strait and DrakePassage (Sts. 224 and 223). A maximum of‘diatoms’ was shown by CHEMTAX at surfacein St. 225, but this feature could not be explainedby diatom abundance patterns or by changes indiatom species. As the pigment pattern was by far
Fig. 10. Concentrations of carotenoids from FRUELA 96
cruise: (a) St. 226, (b) St. 225, and (c) St. 223.
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747738
dominated by diatoms, we can hypothesize thatthe CHEMTAX maximum was due to discrepan-cies between the actual and calculated pigmentratios. On the other hand, a maximum(150 cells ml�1) of unidentified and very smalldiatoms (o10 mm) at St. 223 was not reconstructedby CHEMTAX. This fact could be explainedeither by Chl c1-lacking diatom species or by verylow Chl c1/Chl c2 ratios yielding undetectablelevels of Chl c1.
CHEMTAX results described a wider spatialdistribution of ‘cryptophytes’ as compared to thatdetected by microscopic counts (Fig. 3). Thisfeature seems to be associated with the significantcorrelation between small flagellates abundanceand Allo. Thus, thanks to the detection of Allo,the chemotaxonomic approach can highlight adifferent distribution, from the microscopic ap-proach, for this microalgal group. ‘Pyramimonas’presented a distribution pattern similar to that of
Fig. 11. CHEMTAX estimates of phytoplankton pigment groups to total Chl a concentrations during FRUELA 95 cruise: (a)
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747 739
Fig. 12. CHEMTAX estimates of phytoplankton pigment groups to total Chl a concentrations during FRUELA 95 cruise: (a) St. 226
(b) St. 225, and (c) St. 223.
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747740
FRUELA 95, with the highest abundance at thesouthwestern Gerlache Strait and the frontal area(St. 225, Fig. 12).
The distribution pattern of ‘chemotaxonomicgroup’ (Fig. 12) was not paralleled by cell counts ofa single algal class, although it resembled thatdescribed for Chl c3, as well as the combinedpatterns of dinoflagellates and small flagellates cellnumbers.
3.4. CHEMTAX estimates vs. cell counting
Direct comparisons of CHEMTAX estimates ofChl a contributed by different chemotaxonomicgroups and phytoplankton cell counts showed agood agreement for diatoms, cryptophytes, andPyramimonas sp. (Figs. 13 and 14). Discrepancieswere observed for P. cf. antarctica and smallflagellates and dinoflagellates as compared with‘chemotaxonomic group’. In FRUELA 95, esti-mates of Chl a contributed by ‘Phaeocystis’ yielded
a poor correlation with cell counts (r2 ¼ 0:12; P >0:05; n ¼ 50), whereas in FRUELA 96 a significantcorrelation was observed but only a few samplesshowed presence of P. cf. antarctica (n ¼ 7).Estimates of small flagellate numbers were sig-nificantly correlated with ‘chemotaxonomic group’(Fig. 13c) during the FRUELA 95 cruise, but the‘chemotaxonomic group’ in the FRUELA 96 cruiseappeared to be significantly related to dinoflagel-late abundance (Fig. 14d) and showed no signifi-cant relationship with the small flagellatedistribution.
4. Discussion
4.1. Phytoplankton assemblages
Two distinct phytoplankton assemblages canbe delineated using light microscopy observations:(i) microplankton-sized cells (diatoms and
Fig. 13. Contribution to Chl a in FRUELA 95 cruise for each group calculated by CHEMTAX against cell numbers (cells ml�1) in the
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747 741
Pyramimonas sp.) at the southwestern GerlacheStrait and its frontal zone and (ii) cryptophytes(FRUELA 95) and P. cf. antarctica (FRUELA 96)at the Bransfield Strait. Bird and Karl (1991) hadalready detected a massive bloom of Pyramimonassp. reaching 25 mg Chl a l�1, a similar value tothose obtained in this study (19.9 mg Chl a l�1 inFRUELA 95 and 26.1 mg Chl a l�1 in FRUELA96) at the frontal zone of the northern GerlacheStrait. Vernet (1992) distinguished pigment pat-terns belonging to diatoms and Pyramimonas-likecells at the southern end of the Gerlache Strait andcryptomonads farther north. The occurrence ofcryptophytes in Antarctic waters is also welldocumented (Schloss and Estrada, 1994; Detmerand Bathmann, 1997). In particular, bloomdensities have been reported at the Gerlache(Ferrario and Sar, 1992) and Bransfield Straits(Mura and Agust!ı, 1998).
The variability of the phytoplankton assem-blages in the studied coastal region appears to berelated to the interaction of different oceano-graphic processes (like stabilization of the upper
mixed layer by ice melting or development offrontal systems) that trigger recurrent blooms inthe spring and summer months (Holm-Hansenand Mitchell, 1991; Moline and Prezelin, 1996;Prezelin et al., 1992). In this context, the presenceof P. cf. antarctica (reported as a typical ice alga)and diatoms in the southwestern Gerlache Straitseems to be favored by the melting of ice and thedevelopment of stratified conditions in this area(Varela et al., 2002). On the other hand, the frontalarea in the northeastern Gerlache Strait representsa boundary region favorable to the developmentand establishment of large-sized phytoplanktonpopulations (L .utjeharms et al., 1985; Smetaceket al., 1997; Turner and Owens, 1995), such asthose of Pyramimonas sp., and the diatomsregistered in this study. The dominance ofcryptophytes and P. cf. antarctica in the stratifiedBransfield Strait waters could be explained by twonon-excluding mechanisms: first, these flagellatedalgae should be favored during enhanced watercolumn stability periods (Ki�rboe, 1993; Margalef,1978), and second, krill grazing pressure also could
C r yp tophytes abundance0 50 100 150 200 250 300
0 .00
0 .02
0 .04
0 .06
0 .08
0 .10
0 .12
0 .14
r ² = 0 .82
D ia tom s abundance0 200 400 600 800
0
2
4
6
8
10
r ² = 0 .73
(A)
(C)
P y ram im onas sp abundance0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747742
be determining the phytoplankton size distributionby removing selectively larger organisms from thewater column (Varela et al., 2002).
4.2. Interpretation of pigment data
Pigment analysis during the FRUELA 96 cruiseallowed the detection of significant amounts ofalloxanthin, which was attributed to cryptophytes.However, the light-microscopy observations didnot corroborate the presence of this algal group. Apossible explanation for such a disagreement couldbe (i) the presence of small free-living cryptophytesincluded into the small flagellates group, (ii)problem of sample preservation, or (iii) thepresence of the ciliate Mesodinium rubrum, whichcould contain cryptophytes as endosymbionts, asdescribed by Gieskes and Kraay (1983). The firstof hypothesis seems more plausible, given thatcryptophyte cell may have been included into thesmall flagellates group. This also seems confirmedby the significant correlation found between smallflagellate abundance and Allo. The other twoexplanations have been discarded, as samples wereadequately preserved and analyzed in a short-timeperiod (4 months), and presence of M. rubrum wasnot detected by cell counts.
We calculated the presence of diatoms using amore specific pigment pattern, which also includedChl c1, a pigment that showed an exclusive andhigh correlation with the distribution of diatomsduring this study. The CHEMTAX output ratiomatrix lowered the Chl c1/Chl a ratio with respectto the initial guess, and this trend also could beconfirmed in chromatograms from samples domi-nated by diatoms (Fig. 8d). The discrepanciesfound between CHEMTAX-derived distributionsand diatom cell counts at St. 225 could beexplained by the variability of in situ pigmentratios with respect to those calculated by theCHEMTAX program, or by changes in theaverage diatom cell size (there was a higherproportion of large species, such as Odontellaweissflogii, at this station). The lack of pigmentcontribution by the diatoms at St. 223 could bedue to the small size of the diatom cells at thisstation.
The distribution of Chl c2-MGDG deservesspecial significance due to its chemotaxonomicalvalue regarding haptophyte populations. Thissingular pigment (Garrido et al., 2000) seems tobe a useful marker (as shown by its specificcorrelation with P. cf. antarctica numbers) todiscriminate some haptophytes from members ofother taxonomic groups (dinoflagellates, chryso-phytes) sharing some chlorophylls (e.g. Chl c3),and/or carotenoids (e.g. Fuco, But-fuco, Hex-fuco). Considering the Chl c pigment patternobserved at Sts. 177 and 184, the presence ofdifferent algal groups could be inferred. Forinstance, at St. 177 the high concentrations ofHex-fuco and Chl c2-MGDG denoted the presenceof ‘typical’ haptophytes (P. antarctica). However,at St. 184 the Hex-fuco concentration decreasedaround 50% and Chl c2-MGDG was nearlyabsent, whereas a higher Chl c3 concentrationwas observed. This latter pigment pattern was inagreement with that obtained for the ‘chemotaxo-nomic group’ (higher proportions of Chl c2, Chl c3,and But-fuco, with minor contributions of Hex-fuco), which represented approximately the mixeddistribution of dinoflagellates and small flagellatesduring the FRUELA 95 and 96 cruises.
The ‘chemotaxonomic group’ in CHEMTAXanalysis was created to describe the hypotheticaldistribution of phytoplankton contributing thosepigments that could not be explained by micro-scopic counts of specific groups. As previouslymentioned, a Phaeocystis-like pigment pattern wasfound at several stations (e.g. 184 and 178(FRUELA 95) and 223 (FRUELA 96)) where noP. cf. antarctica cells were observed. The discre-pancy could be explained by flagellated stages ofP. cf. antarctica, which would be included into thesmall flagellate group or by other groups con-tributing to this Phaeocystis-like pigment pattern(e.g. dinoflagellates, chrysophytes). We chose apigment profile including Chl c3, Chl c2, Fuco,But-fuco, and Hex-fuco resembling the patternobserved in chromatograms of those stations. Thepigment ratios were selected using the dinoflagel-late G. galatheanum (CS 310), which resembled thepigment relationships for the proposed unknowngroup. The output ratios obtained by CHEMTAXsignificantly lowered the initial Hex-fuco : Chl a
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747 743
ratio, increasing those relative to But-fuco andFuco, which supports the presence of chrysophytesas a component of the ‘chemotaxonomic group’.During the FRUELA 95 cruise, the dominantpigment pattern associated with small flagellatepopulations matched the pigment compositionattributed to the ‘chemotaxonomic group’. How-ever, in the FRUELA 96 cruise, a significantrelationship was observed between dinoflagellateabundance and the distribution of the ‘chemotaxo-nomic group’, which could reflect a change indinoflagellate species composition. An importantlimitation of our HPLC work was that thedinoflagellate distribution could not be describedseparately because peridinin was not detected inany samples. Autotrophic dinoflagellates presentin these samples were probably included in the‘chemotaxonomical group’ of the CHEMTAXanalysis, as we assume, in these peridinin-lackingdinoflagellates, a pigment composition consistingof fucoxanthins and its derivatives But-fuco andHex-fuco as is the case for some Gymnodinium spp.(e.g. G. galatheanum, Johnsen and Sakshaug(1993); G. breve, Zapata et al. (1998)).
It must be considered that the CHEMTAXoutput is highly dependent upon the initialestimates of pigment ratios, and that it requiresconstant pigment : Chl a ratios for each algal classand a significant number of samples to obtainmeaningful results. We analyzed only a reducednumber of samples (n ¼ 55), and employed asingle pigment pattern, selecting the pigmentcomposition (and pigment ratios) obtained fromPhaeocystis (RG 2.2 strain), in order to recon-struct the haptophyte distribution. Carote-noid : Chl a ratios among Phaeocystis species(Vaulot et al., 1994) and P. antarctica strains canbe highly variable (Zapata et al., in preparation),and differences between colonies and flagellatestages of a same strain also have been reported(Bidigare et al., 1996).
Moreover, the presence of dinoflagellates (andother members of the small flagellate group)sharing a similar pigment pattern (Chl c3, But-fuco, and Hex-fuco) could indicate the algaldistribution patterns inferred by CHEMTAX.This seems the case at St. 178 (FRUELA 95),where P. cf. antarctica cells observed in surface
samples have been assigned to the ‘chemotaxo-nomic group’.
The chlorophylls detected in this study con-stituted a complex mixture of polar and non-polaraccessory pigments (Chl c1, Chl c2, Chl c3,MgDVP, Chl c2-MGDG, and Chl b) and repre-sent, as far as we know, the first detaileddescription of the distribution pattern of Chl cpigments in the Southern Ocean. We employedthis additional information to enhance the numberof marker pigments included in the CHEMTAXanalysis with Chls c contributed by different algalgroups (Chl c1, ‘diatoms’; Chl c3, ‘Phaeocystis’ and‘chemotaxonomic group’; Chl c2-MGDG, ‘Phaeo-cystis’). The results obtained in this work show theimportance of achieving high resolution of Chls c,which provide chemotaxonomically importantmarkers for some specific groups (e.g. Chl c2-MGDG in haptophytes and Chl c1 for diatoms).
New advances of the chemotaxonomic ap-proach will depend on: (i) improvement of presentday knowledge about pigment patterns from algalclasses, (ii) investigation of pigment patternvariability for members of a single genus orspecies, (iii) detection of new marker pigmentsand development of improved HPLC methods forpigment analysis, and (iv) knowledge of mechan-isms underlying changes affecting pigment ratios inthe photosynthetic apparatus of phytoplanktonspecies.
The results presented here highlight the impor-tance of isolating different typical Antarctic speciesand characterizing their pigment patterns toimprove the usefulness of HPLC pigment analysisin ascertaining phytoplankton composition. Inspite of their limitations, HPLC pigment analysisand CHEMTAX data processing represent apowerful approach to study the taxonomic com-position of phytoplankton assemblages, speciallywhen the smallest groups contribute significantlyto the overall community.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the captain, crew, andscientists on board the R.V. Hesp !erides for theirco-operation and logistic support. We are parti-
F. Rodriguez et al. / Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 723–747744
cularly grateful to Emilio Fern!andez for collectingsamples during FRUELA 93’ cruise. We thankMarta Estrada, Emilio Fern!andez, Mikel Latasa,and two anonymous reviewers for critical com-ments and suggestions that improved the qualityof this paper.
References
Andersen, R.A., Bidigare, R.R., Keller, M.D., Latasa, M.,
1996. A comparison of HPLC pigment signatures and
electron microscopic observations for oligotrophic waters of
the North Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Deep-Sea Research
II 43, 517–537.
Azam, F., Smith, D.C., Hollibaugh, J.T., 1991. The role of the
microbial loop in Antarctic pelagic ecosystems. Polar