Top Banner
8

Phyto73n02 293 - American Phytopathological Society · was the same species described by Bitancourt and Jenkins, who made no mention of internode elongation in their description of

Apr 17, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Phyto73n02 293 - American Phytopathological Society · was the same species described by Bitancourt and Jenkins, who made no mention of internode elongation in their description of
Page 2: Phyto73n02 293 - American Phytopathological Society · was the same species described by Bitancourt and Jenkins, who made no mention of internode elongation in their description of
Page 3: Phyto73n02 293 - American Phytopathological Society · was the same species described by Bitancourt and Jenkins, who made no mention of internode elongation in their description of
Page 4: Phyto73n02 293 - American Phytopathological Society · was the same species described by Bitancourt and Jenkins, who made no mention of internode elongation in their description of
Page 5: Phyto73n02 293 - American Phytopathological Society · was the same species described by Bitancourt and Jenkins, who made no mention of internode elongation in their description of
Page 6: Phyto73n02 293 - American Phytopathological Society · was the same species described by Bitancourt and Jenkins, who made no mention of internode elongation in their description of
Page 7: Phyto73n02 293 - American Phytopathological Society · was the same species described by Bitancourt and Jenkins, who made no mention of internode elongation in their description of
Page 8: Phyto73n02 293 - American Phytopathological Society · was the same species described by Bitancourt and Jenkins, who made no mention of internode elongation in their description of