Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Liquid State Liquid State NMR Quantum NMR Quantum Computing Computing Mikio Nakahara, Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Computing, Kinki University, Japan Japan Financial supports from Kinki Univ., MEXT and JSPS
48
Embed
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
1
Liquid State NMR Liquid State NMR Quantum Quantum ComputingComputing
Mikio Nakahara,Mikio Nakahara,
Research Centre for Quantum Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, JapanComputing, Kinki University, Japan
DiVincenzo Criteria for NMR QCDiVincenzo Criteria for NMR QC A scalable physical system with well charactA scalable physical system with well charact
erized qubits.erized qubits. The ability to initialize the state of the qubits The ability to initialize the state of the qubits
to a simple fiducial state, such as |00…0>.to a simple fiducial state, such as |00…0>. Long decoherence times, much longer than Long decoherence times, much longer than
the gate operation time.the gate operation time. A “universal” set of quantum gates.A “universal” set of quantum gates. A qubit-specific measurement capability.A qubit-specific measurement capability.
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
41
Scalability Selective addressing to each qubit becom
es harder and hader as the # of qubits increases. Limited # of nuclear spices and overlap of resonance freqs.
Signal strength is suppressed as the # of qubits increases. Readout problem.
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
42
Initialization (pseudopure state) # of steps required to prepare a pseudopur
e state increases exponentially as the # of qubits increases.
No real entanglement
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
43
Long decoherence time Decoherence time Single-qubit gate operation time Two-qubit gate op. time May execute Shor’s algorithm for 21=3X7.
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
44
A “universal” set of quantum gates.A “universal” set of quantum gates. One-qubit gates by Rabi oscillation. Two-qubit gates by J-coupling. Cannot turn off interactions; reforcusing te
chnique becomes complicated as the # of qubits increases.
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
45
Measurement capability.Measurement capability.
FID is a well-established techunique. Quantum State Tomograpy and Quantum
Process Tomography are OK. S/N scales as , which limits
the # of qubits to ~ 10.
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
46
Still… NMR QC is commercially available. It can execute small scale quantum algorithms. It serves as a test bed for a real QC to come. May ideas in other realizations are inspired from
NMR. We use NMR QC to demonstrate theoretical
ideas, such as decoherence suppression, optimal control of a Hamiltonian etc.
Liquid state NMR QC is based on a well-established technology. Most of the materials introduced here have been already known in the NMR community for decades.
There are still many papers on NMR QC. It is required to find a breakthrogh for a liquid sta
te NMR to be a candidate of a working QC. ENDOR, Solid state NMR… Thank you for your attention.