Top Banner
Photovoltaic and Wind Cost Decrease: Implications for Investment Analysis by Ignacio Mauleón . Dept. of Economics and Business Management. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain. [email protected]
20

Photovoltaic and wind cost decreases implications for investment

Jan 25, 2017

Download

Economy & Finance

imauleecon
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • Photovoltaic and Wind Cost Decrease:Implications for Investment Analysis

    by

    Ignacio Maulen.

    Dept. of Economics and Business Management.Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

    [email protected]

  • Index.Index.

    1. Introduction.

    2. Methodology.

    2.1. Learning Rate & simulation.

    2.2. Published PV & Wind LR.

    2.3. Photovoltaic LR.

    2.4. Wind LR.

    2I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

    3. Results.

    3.1. Framework.

    3.2. Total investment.

    3.3. Risk analysis.

    4. Summary & Implications.

    5. Pending research.

  • 1. Introduction.Introduction.

    Total Investment and paths implied by Renewable Energy targets.

    COP 21IEA, estimates 2.5 tr. US $

    Analysis:

    3I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

    Price decreases with deployment.

    Uncertain estimates: Simulations. Risk analysis

  • 2.1. Learning Rate & simulation.2.1. Learning Rate & simulation.

    Pt = k Ctb

    Pt , Price (module, turbines)Ct , Capacity installed.b , Learning coefficient.

    Learning Rate (LR):

    Doubling capacity % price decrease

    4I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

    Doubling capacity % price decrease

    but:

    b unknown estimated statistically uncertain

    LR uncertain price decreases uncertain simulated

  • 2.2. Published PV & Wind Learning Rates.2.2. Published PV & Wind Learning Rates.

    REPORTED LEARNING RATES (%) (Rubin e.a, 2015)

    N of studies Mean Range

    Wind - onshore 18 12 -11 ; 23

    Solar PV 16 22 10 ; 47

    5I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

    Solar PV 16 22 10 ; 47

    Too much variability.

    Insufficient stat. detail.

  • 2.3. The photovoltaic Learning Rate.2.3. The photovoltaic Learning Rate.

    PV Cost Model Estimation.

    Learning by doing, PV costs & Installed Capacity.

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    4.5

    MODULE PRICES w.r.t. CAPACITY O.L.S. regression (logs.) & Learning Rate (LR)

    Log(P)=3.98-0.33*Log(Cap) (45.) (26.)

    R2=0.95, D.W.=0.44 LR=20% (23.1)

    1978

    1979

    1980

    1981

    19821983

    19841985

    6I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12

    Log(

    mod

    ule

    pric

    es)

    Log(Installed capacity)

    19851986

    1987

    19881989

    199019911992

    199319941995

    1996199719981999

    20002001 20022003

    20042005

    2006 2007 2008

    2009

    2010

    2011

    20122013

  • 2.3. The photovoltaic Learning Rate.2.3. The photovoltaic Learning Rate.

    7I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

  • 2.4. The wind Learning Rate.2.4. The wind Learning Rate.

    Insuficient reliable data world level IRENA working on data base.

    Data

    - Turbine prices Denmark- Turbine, LCOE, US

    Overall results:

    8I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

    Overall results:

    Learning Rate ~ 13% Confidence bands estimated.

  • 3.1. Framework.3.1. Framework.

    CAPACITY FORECASTS

    (world Gw.)

    PV Wind Total

    2020 390 640 1030

    9I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

    2030 1720 1600 3320

    2050 4670 2700 7370

    IEA, International Energy Agency; Technology Roadmaps.

  • 3.1. Framework.3.1. Framework.

    Simulating Total Investment.

    Total amount of funds vs. unitary price.

    Price depends on investment.

    ( ) TIPI nn tt =1

    10I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

    ( ) TIPI ntt =1It , increase in capacity.

    Pt , module / turbine price.

    TIn , total accumulated investment; years 1 to n.

  • 3.2. Total Investment.3.2. Total Investment.

    TOTAL INVESTMENT (b. us $)

    Random Not random

    2030 mean 1580 1444

    (50%) 1473

    (90%) 2063

    11I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

    2050 mean 2779 2513

    Randomness => Median (50%)

    Risk: 1.4 , 40% hi.

  • 3.2. Total Investment.3.2. Total Investment.

    TOTAL INVESTMENT (b. us $)

    Slow Path Fast Path

    2030 676 2492

    2050 2765 2831

    Discounting (3%)

    12I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

    2050 1486 2066

    2050, similar 2031, sharp drop (fast) Discounting

  • 3.2. Total Investment.3.2. Total Investment.

    13I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

  • 3.2. Total Investment.3.2. Total Investment.

    14I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

  • 3.3. Risk analysis.3.3. Risk analysis.

    Expected Investment at Risk (EIaR):

    Expected Investment, if prices rise above a given high value.

    [ ][ ]

    TITIob =Pr

    15I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

    [ ][ ] EIRTITITIE =|

    e.g., valuexupperx ,,,%,90=TI, Total Investment

  • 3.3. Risk analysis.3.3. Risk analysis.

    16I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

  • 4. Summary & implications.4. Summary & implications.

    Cost models efficiently estimated.

    Learning Rates: PV > 23%

    Wind ~ 13%

    Parameter uncertainty SimulaDons Risk

    Accelerated Investment paths: = Invest. 2050

    2031 !.

    17I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

    Caveat: Price decreases for ever ?.

  • 4. Summary & implications.4. Summary & implications.

    18I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

  • 5. Pending research.5. Pending research.

    Costs.

    - Balance of system costs (BoS).- Discounting. - Investment paths (speed, smoothness, )

    Benefits.

    19I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)

    - GHG, - Value electricity.-

  • Thank you for your attention !

    20I.Maulen (Univ. Urjc, Madrid)