Philosophy Science & Politics Where is the World Going? San Marcos University - NIOS 1 & 2 March 2007 Lima, Peru Part One: Philosophy & Science III Bharatiya-sanskriti - Festival of Classical Indian Culture
Dec 14, 2015
PhilosophyScience
&Politics
Where is the World Going?
San Marcos University - NIOS
1 & 2 March 2007
Lima, Peru
Part One: Philosophy & Science
III Bharatiya-sanskriti - Festival of Classical Indian Culture
University of CaliforniaPsychology
Northwestern UniversityDonald T. Camplbell
Okinawa Black Belt
Bengali Vaisnava monk
Dr. T. D. SinghBhaktivedanta Institute
Manipur
Calcutta University – Chemistry
University of Buffalo
University of California
Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami
B. S. Damodara SwamiDr. T. D. Singh
1984 Bombay1st World Congress for the Synthesis of Science and Religion
1990 San Francisco1st International Seminar on the Study of Consciousness in Science
1997 Calcutta2nd World Congress for the Synthesis of Science and Religion
Charles Townes
Nobel Prize - Laser
Sir John EcclesNobel Prize
Neurophysiology
George WaldNobel Prize -
Chemistry
Dalai LamaNobel Prize -
Peace
Paulos GregoriousPresident of
World Council of Churches
CONTENT
A Rapid Sanskrit Method Profesor George Hart, Universidad de California
Catalogus Catalogorum – 160,000
• Vastu-veda – Arquitectura• Ayurveda – Medicina• Yantra-vidhi – Mecánica• Jyotisha-veda– Astronomy, astrology• Gandharva-veda – Music, Dance, Drama• Danda-veda – Ciencias Políticas
• Sankhya – General Philosophy of Nature
Bhagavad-gītā 7.4bhūmir āpo 'nalo vāyuh
kham mano buddhir eva caahankara itīyam me
bhinna prakrtir astadha
Earth, water, fire, air, space, mind, intelligence and false ego — all
together these eight constitute My separated material energies.
My separated material energies.
False ego - I am independent of God.
Intelligence – I know.
Mind - I think.
Space - I hear.
Air - I feel.
Fire - I see.
Water - I taste.
Earth - I smell.
• Carl Jung
Tavistock Lectures
Hopi Indians
• Black Poetess
SankhyaPSYCOLOGICAL
Ahankara – Ego Reflejado
Buddhi – Knowledge
Manas – Mind
SankhyaAhankara
Philosophy • noun - the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence.
ORIGIN - Greek philosophia ‘love of wisdom’. The Compact Oxford English Dictionary
TOMMORROW
Danda-veda -- Political Science, Social Philosophy
Classical Indian Philosophy can supply a Philosophy of Nature that integrates the study of physical, psychological, ethical and intuitive levels.
Continued study: Pada-padma, the first two cantos of Srimad Bhagavatam
Fundamental Questions
1. If the Sankhya is so great then why haven’t we heard about it before?
2. Can make a heaven on earth?
3. What about weapons for self defense?
4. What do the Scientists say about this?
Heaven on Earth
Psychotic CoreMichael Eigen, April 2004
Everyone is possessed of a fundamental narcissistic complex in which the self has become both the subject and object of its own erotic potency.
Mental hospital.Therapeutically perfect.
What do the Scientists say?
QUANTUM QUESTIONSKen Wilbur, Shambala, 1984
Albert EinsteinETHICAL DIMENSIONThe scientific method can teach us nothing else beyond how facts are related to, and conditioned by each other. The aspiration toward such objective knowledge belongs to the highest of which man is capable, and you will certainly not suspect me of wishing to belittle the achievements and the heroic efforts of man in this sphere. Yet it is equally clear that knowledge of what is does not open the door directly to knowledge of what should be.
INTUITION & MOTIVATIONThis knowledge of objective truth as such is wonderful, but it is so little capable of acting as a guide that it cannot prove even the justification and the value of the aspiration toward that very knowledge of truth. Here we face, therefore, the limits of the purely rational conception of our existence.Pg 106
What do the Scientists say?
Prince Louis de Broglie
INTUITION & MOTIVATIONThe great epoch-making discoveries of the history of science (think, for example, of that of universal gravitation) have been sudden lightening flashes, making us perceive in one single glance a harmony up untill then unsuspected, and it is to have, from time to time, the divine joy of discovering such harmonies that pure science works without sparing its toil or seeking for profit.Pg. 117
What do the Scientists say?
Prince Louis de Broglie
ETHICAL DIMENSIONIn the last chapter of his great work, The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, Henri Bergson, having reached almost the end of his book, showed to us a humanity in the formidable grip of mechanism, and as if succumbing under the weight of the discoveries and inventions which the creative ability of its mind had been able to realize.Bergsen rightly says: Machines which move on petrol, on coal, hydro-electric power and which convert into motion the potential energies accumulated during millions of years, have given to our organism so vast an extension and so formidable a power, so disproportionate to its dimensions and strength, that surely it had never been foreseen in the plan of the structure of the species.
And wishing to make us appreciate the essential point and the disquieting side of the problem, he adds: Now, in this excessively enlarged body, the spirit remains what it was, too small now to fill it, too feeble too direct it. Now this increased body awaits a supplement of the soul, now the mechanism demands a mysticism.
Finally, the work finishes on these words, pregnant with meaning: Humanity groans half-crushed under the weight of the advances that it has made. It does not know sufficiently that its future depends on itself. It is for it, above all, to make up its mind if it wishes to continue to live.Pg. 122
What do the Scientists say?
Max PlanckI might put the matter in another way and say that the freedom of the ego here and now, and its independence of the causal chain, is a truth that comes from the immediate dictate of the human consciousness.Pg. 150
What do the Scientists say?
Werner Heisenberg(From his book, Wolfgang Pauli’s Philosophical Outlook)Very early in his career Pauli had followed the road of skepticism based in rationalism right to the end, and he then tried to trace out those elements of the cognitive process that precede a rational understanding in depth.Pg 158
Wolfgang Pauli
Werner Heisenberg
What do the Scientists say?
Sir Arthur EddingtonWhat is the truth about ourselves? Various answers suggest themselves. We are a bit of stellar matter gone wrong. We are physical machinery, puppets that strut and talk and laugh and die as the hand of time pulls the strings beneath. But there is one elementary inescapable answer. We are that which asks the question. Whatever else there may be in our natures, responsibility towards truth is one of its attributes. This side of our nature is aloof from the scrutiny of the physicist. I do not think it is sufficiently covered by admitting a mental aspect of our being. It has to do with conscience rather than consciousnessPg 178
What do the Scientists say?
Sir Arthur EddingtonThe materialist who is convinced that all phenomena arise from electrons and quanta and the like controlled by mathematical formulae, must presumably hold the belief that his wife is a rather elaborate differential equation, but he is probably tactful enough not to obtrude this opinion in domestic life. If this kind of scientific dissection is felt to be inadequate and irrelevant in ordinary personal relationships, it is surely out of place in the most personal relationship of all, that of the human soul to the divine spirit.Pg 207