Top Banner
Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS
31

Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Jan 01, 2016

Download

Documents

Alberta Price
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Philosophical Writing

Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhDPhilosophy of Science Department,

IHCS

Page 2: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

What is the differences between scientific writing and philosophical writing?

Philosophical Scientific

Thesis At the beginning At the end

Reasoning Argument Evidence

Method Critical thinking Empirical

Page 3: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

The Structure of philosophical writing

Page 4: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

• Analyze an Issue Task

• Analyze an Argument Task

Page 5: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Issue Task

Page 6: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Issue Task

assesses your ability to think critically about a topic of general interest according to specific instructions, and to clearly express your thoughts about it in writing.

Page 7: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Issue Task

Each issue statement makes a claim that test takers can discuss from various perspectives and apply to many different situations or conditions.

Page 8: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Sample Analyze an Issue Task

As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

Page 9: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Issue Task

• is an exercise in critical thinking and persuasive writing.

• The purpose of this task is to determine how well you can

(1) develop a convincing argument supporting your own evaluation of an issue

(2) effectively communicate that argument in writing to an academic audience.

Page 10: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Issue Task

• Decide what position on the issue you want to take and defend.

• Decide what convincing evidence (reasons and examples) you can use to support your position.

Page 11: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Issue Task

Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with a general statement Consider circumstances in which the statement might or might not hold true.

Page 12: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Issue Task/ 8 principles

1. What, exactly, is the central issue?2. What, exactly, are the instructionsasking me to do?3. Do I agree with all or with any part ofthe claim? Why or why not?4. Does the claim make certain assumptions?If so, are they reasonable?

Page 13: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Issue Task/ 8 principles

5. Is the claim valid only under certain conditions? If so, what are they?

6. Do I need to explain how I interpret certain terms or concepts used in the claim?

Page 14: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Issue Task/ 8 principles

7. If I take a certain position on the issue,what reasons support my position?

8. What examples—either real or hypothetical—could I use to illustrate those reasons and advance my point of view? Which examples are most compelling?

Page 15: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Once you have decided on a position to defend

consider the perspective of others who mightnot agree with your position. Ask yourself:

1. What reasons and/or examples mightsomeone use to refute or underminemy position?2. How should I acknowledge or defend againstthose views in my essay?

Page 16: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

تمرین

امروزه در برنامه واکسیناسیون هر روز واکسن •جددی اضافه میشود. گسترش پوشش

واکسیناسیون در نهایت سبب میشود که گونه انسان در برابر بیماریها ضعیف شود و نتواند در

برابر آنها به خوبی از خود محافظت کند.

آیا شما با این ادعا موافق هستید یا •مخالف؟ موضع خود را به روشنی بیان کنید و در دفاع از موضع خود برهان های الزم را

بیاورید.

Page 17: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Argument Task

Page 18: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

The Goal of Analyze an Argument Task

assesses your ability to understand, analyze, and evaluate arguments according to specific instructions and to clearly convey your evaluation in writing.

Page 19: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

What is Analyze an Argument Task

The task consists of a brief passage in which the author makes a case for some course of action or interpretation of events by presenting claims backed by reasons and evidence.

Page 20: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Argument Task

Your task is to discuss the logical soundness of the author’s case according to the specific instructions by critically examining the line of reasoning and use of evidence.

Page 21: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Argument TaskIn reading the argument, you should pay specialattention to the following elements:1. What is offered as evidence, support, orproof2. What is explicitly stated, claimed, orconcluded3. What is assumed or supposed, perhapswithout justification or proof4. What is not stated, but necessarily followsfrom what is stated

Page 22: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Argument Task

• Analyze an Argument task and with certain key concepts:

• Alternative explanation• Analysis• Assumption• Counterexample• Evaluation

Page 23: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Argument Task

Alternative explanation:

A possible competing version of what might have caused the events in question; an alternative explanation that undercuts or qualifies the original explanation because it too can account for the observed facts

Page 24: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Argument Task

Analysis:The process of breaking something(e.g., an argument) down into its componentparts in order to understand how they worktogether to make up the whole

Page 25: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Argument Task

• Assumption:A belief, often unstated or unexamined, that

someone must hold in order to maintain a particular position; something that is taken for granted but that must be true in order for the conclusion to be true

Page 26: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Argument Task

• Counter-example:An example, real or hypothetical, that refutes or

disproves a statement in the argument

Page 27: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

Analyze an Argument Task

• Evaluation:An assessment of the quality ofevidence and reasons in an argument andof the overall merit of an argument

Page 28: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

do the followingAnalyze an Argument Task

1.Carefully read the argument and the specificinstructions—you might want to read themover more than once.2. Identify as many of the argument’s claims,conclusions, and underlying assumptionsas possible, and evaluate their quality.3. Think of as many alternative explanationsand counterexamples as you can.

Page 29: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

do the followingAnalyze an Argument Task

4. Think of what specific additional evidencemight weaken or lend support to the claims.5. Ask yourself what changes in the argumentwould make the reasoning more sound.

Page 30: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

لطفا متن زیر را با دقت بخوانید و •ادعا و برهانهای آن را ارزیابی

نمایید و در پایان به این پرسش پاسخ دهید که آیا ادعا و

استدالالت آن قابل قبول و موجه هستند یا نه؟

Page 31: Philosophical Writing Alireza Monajemi, MD-PhD Philosophy of Science Department, IHCS.

تمرینپزشکی رایج یا مدرن دچار بحران شده است. •

هدف پزشکی ریشه کنی بیماریها بود. این هدف با کشف واکسن و آنتی بیوتیک محقق شد چرا

که بسیاری از بیماریها مثل آبله ریشه کن شدند. اما در حال حاضر، هر روز بر تعداد بیماریها

افزوده میشود و نسبت به ابتدای قرن بیستم تعداد بیماریها چند برابر شده است. بسیاری از

بیماریهای مزمن هم قابل ریشه کنی نیستند.پس از آنجا که طب مدرن به هدف خود که ریشه کنی بیماریهاست نرسیده است دچار

بحران شده است.