PERPETUAL MOTION The History
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 1/21
PERPETUAL MOTIONThe History
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 2/21
Villard de Honnecourt, 1235
Many a time have skillful workmen tried to contrive a wheel that should turn of itself; here is a way to makesuch a one, by means of anuneven number of mallets.
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 3/21
Moreover, you might set yourself to prove that by
equiping such a wheel with many balances, every
part, however small, which turned over as the
result of percussion would suddenly cause another
balance to fall, and by this the wheel would stand
in perpetual movement. But by this you would be
deceiving yourself... As the attachment of the heavy
body is farther from the center of the wheel, the
revolving movement of the wheel round its pivot
will become more difficult, although the motive power may not vary.
daVinci
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 4/21
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 5/21
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 6/21
Buoyancy-driven electric power generator United States Patent 6734574
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 7/21
George Linton (1821)British Patent 4632
Dircks (1861) p. 436
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 8/21
SCAMS
Charles Redheffer, 1812
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 9/21
A LITTLE PHYSICS...
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 10/21
First law of thermodynamics --energy is conserved in any process
involving a thermodynamic systemand its surroundings.
A violation of this would be aperpetual motion machine of the first kind .
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 11/21
Second law of thermodynamics -- “No process is possiblewhose sole result is the transfer of heat from a body of lowertemperature to a body of higher temperature.” (Clausius)
Spontaneously, heat goes from hot to cold objects, and only
the reverse when work is done on the system, e.g.,pluggingin your refrigerator.
Alternatively, the entropy of systems tends toward amaximum.
A violation of this would be a perpetual motion machine ofthe second kind .
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 12/21
UNDERSTANDING IT PROBABILISTICALLY
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 13/21
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 14/21
USPTO
The USPTO Manual of Patent Examining Practice states:
With the exception of cases involving perpetual motion, a model is not ordinarily required by the Office to demonstrate the operability of a device. If operability of a device is questioned, the applicant must
establish it to the satisfaction of the examiner , but he or she may choose his or her own way of so doing .[13]
And, further, that:
A rejection [of a patent application] on the ground of lack of utility includes the more specific grounds of inoperativeness, involving perpetual motion. A rejection under 35 U.S.C. 101 for lack of utility should not be based on grounds that the invention is frivolous,fraudulent or against public policy.[14]
The filing of a patent application is a clerical task, and the USPTOwon't refuse filings for perpetual motion machines; the applicationwill be filed and then most probably rejected by the patent examiner,after he has done a formal examination.[15] Even if a patent isgranted, it doesn't mean that the invention actually works; it justmeans that the examiner thinks that it works, or that he couldn't
figure out why it wouldn't work.[15]
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 15/21
JOE NEWMAN’S ENERGY MACHINE
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 16/21
USPTO wanted working model of perpetual motion machines, and if they worked for a year,
then they would be investigated...
Newman’s Energy Machine rejected for a patent...
Newman sued: Newman v Quigg. Judge sent device to lab. over Newman’s protests, and the
device failed the “K-Mart test”. Newman lost.
But support in Mississippi led to private relief hearing in 1986 in the US Senate, thanks to
Senators Trent Lott and Thad Cochran.
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 17/21
'It's a simple enough
problem,'' he said. ''You
measure the input and you
measure the output and
you see which is larger.
Would Mr. Newman agree
to that? If he does, what
laboratory would he like to
have make the
measurements?''
SEN. JOHN GLENN
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 18/21
CBS EVENING NEWS
'He brought his slow -
moving car to a stop aftertwo hours and said it could
have gone on and on.
Newman compared it to
the first flight of the
Wright brothers.''
1987
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 19/21
Newman charges conspiracy, but he is still pluggedinto to the electric grid...
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 20/21
Antigravity Machine Patent Draws Physicists' IreBrian Handwerkfor National Geographic NewsNovember 11, 2005
A perpetual-motion machine may defy the laws of physics, but an Indianainventor recently succeeded in having one patented.
On November 1 Boris Volfson of Huntington, Indiana, received U.S. Patent6,960,975 for his design of an antigravity space vehicle.
7/28/2019 Phil 26 Perpetual Motion Machines
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil-26-perpetual-motion-machines 21/21
http://www.josephnewman.com/
http://www.steorn.com/
The Haisch Quantum vacuum energy extraction system
The McQueen Internal energy generating power source
The Flynn Method for controlling the path of magnetic flux from a permanent magnet
The Gates Spring driven apparatus
http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/free-energy/#more-574