Top Banner
WHISPER 200 ANALYSIS AND REMEDIATION Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith
47

Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Mar 29, 2015

Download

Documents

Aileen Winch
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

WHISPER 200 ANALYSIS AND REMEDIATIONPhase III Presentation

Group 7Thomas KudejMarko SutovicTimothy Smith

Page 2: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

GROUP MEMBERSAdvisor

Professor Basu

Timothy Smith Marko Sutovic

Thomas Kudej

Page 3: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Presentation OutlineProject ObjectiveBackground Phase I-IIPhase III

CFD Initial Conditions Modeling and Results

Experiment Anemometer Program Procedure Results

BudgetGantt ChartNugget ChartPhase IV - Plan of ActionQuestions?

Page 4: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Project Objectives

Whisper 200 Wind TurbineI. Find a Suitable Location for The Whisper 200

a) Acquire Wind Velocity and Directional Data

II. Prove Current Location is InadequateIII. Satisfy Power Generation Requirements

Page 5: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Summary of Phase IOriginal Problem Objective

Examined Wind Turbine Restructure Overall Project Objective

Observed Wind Turbine BehaviorWhisper 200 PerformanceDeveloped Conceptual Designs

Several Designs to Fix the Problem

Page 6: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Conceptual Designs ProposedConceptual Designs Proposed

A. Stability of the Wind TurbineB. Noise Cancellation DevicesC. Use of Isolators to Support The Wind TurbineD. Removal of Aesthetic Lip on BabbioE. Move Turbine to Different LocationF. Funnel Air Towards Turbine

Page 7: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Summary of Phase IIPhase II Objectives

Determining the Power Output of a Wind Turbine as a Function of Wind Speed Wind Direction Wind Characteristics

Determining Superior Roof-top Location for the Whisper 200

Page 8: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Conceptual Designs Wind Fan Power Output

Purpose Results

Page 9: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Conceptual Design AnalysisAnalyzing Results From Experiment

Obstructions on the Babbio Center Roof-top are Affecting Power Production

Building Design and Structure• Proposed Solution

Relocation of Wind TurbineI. Wind Velocity and Directional Testing

I. Plan of Action for Testing

Stevens Campus

Babbio Center

Wind Veloci

ty Testin

g

Wind Directi

on Testin

g

Howe Center

Wind

Velocity

Testing

Wind

Direction

Testing

Castle Point Apartments

Wind

Velocity

Testing

Wind

Direction

Testing

River Lot

Wind

Velocity

Testing

Wind

Direction

Testing

Page 10: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Computational Fluid Dynamics Air Flow Analysis•Using Cosmos Floworks, we were able to simulate the air flow in real world conditions and analyze the effects at each targeted location.•External flow parameters were used instead of internal flow.•The locations modeled in Solid Works were:

• Babbio Center• Howe Center• Castle Point Apartments

•Each model included their respective rooftop structures to determine the effect they could be having on the directional component of air flow.•Initial conditions and Boundary conditions were chosen to define the problem

Page 11: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

CFD – Initial Conditions•Our initial conditions were chosen to simplify the model and decrease solving time as well as give us a fairly accurate portrayal of what is occurring.•Air was selected as the working fluid

• Initial Ambient Conditions• Pressure at 101 kPA• Temperature at 273.5 K

•The velocity of the air in the X direction was set as 5m/s• Through research, the average wind speed in the NYC area

was 4-5 m/s• Start up speed of the Whisper 200 is 3.1 m/s

Page 12: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

CFD – Boundary Conditions•Only one boundary condition was defined

• Walls of each structure•The walls were defined as ideal walls which modeled them as adiabatic and frictionless.•We chose not to model the walls as real because our analysis centered on the effect of each buildings geometry on the wind flow.

• Prove why Babbio is currently not sufficient• Determine location where wind conditions are suitable

•Heat transfer coefficient, wall temperature and roughness factor were all negligible in our assumptions.

Page 13: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

CFD – Babbio Center

Model of the Babbio Center roof top

Page 14: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

CFD – Babbio Center

Air flow over the roof

Page 15: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

CFD – Babbio Center

North face of the Babbio Center – Notice the wake region in the upper right.

Page 16: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

CFD – Babbio Center

Wind coming in from the North-West

Page 17: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

CFD – Howe Center

Model of Howe Center

Page 18: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

CFD – Howe Center

Wind flow over Howe

Page 19: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

CFD – Howe Center

Page 20: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

CFD – Castle Point Apartments

Page 21: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

CFD – Castle Point Apartments

Page 22: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

CFD – Castle Point Apartments

Page 23: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Anemometer ProgramAnemometer lacked a

display device to show analytical data.

DAQ from Design II Lab enabled the reading of voltage outputs from the sensors.

LabView was utilized to create a user interface and log output feature.

Anemometer was calibrated using Fluids Lab wind tunnel.

See Appendix slides A&B for full program and interface.

Page 24: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

ProcedureReadings were taken with the

Anemometer at 8 locations.Babbio, CPA, Howe, and River

LotAll readings were taken

within a two hour time period, as to reduce the effect of changing weather conditions.

Experiment was repeated on multiple days.

Results were analyzed to determine the best placement location for the Whisper 200.

Page 25: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Measurements and Results

Sample was taken at Babbio Location A (original location) on Day 1 between 1:35pm and 1:45pm.

Average Wind Velocity was measured to be 3.6875m/s.

Wind Direction was very sporadic.

Each location was analyzed in this way on three separate days. (See Appendix slides for data)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

1:36

:57 P

M1:

37:2

4 PM

1:37

:37 P

M1:

38:1

3 PM

1:38

:23 P

M1:

38:3

1 PM

1:39

:07 P

M1:

39:2

0 PM

1:39

:32 P

M1:

39:5

8 PM

1:40

:17 P

M1:

40:3

9 PM

1:40

:50 P

M1:

41:0

2 PM

1:42

:01 P

M1:

42:1

4 PM

1:42

:35 P

M1:

43:0

1 PM

1:43

:12 P

M1:

43:3

4 PM

1:43

:48 P

M1:

43:5

7 PM

1:44

:12 P

M1:

44:2

9 PM

1:44

:39 P

M1:

44:4

7 PM

1:45

:02 P

M1:

45:1

6 PM

1:45

:34 P

M1:

45:5

0 PM

1:45

:58 P

M1:

46:0

7 PM

Speed

Page 26: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Measurements and Results

Sample was taken at CPA Location B (optimal location) on Day 1 between 3:00pm and 3:10pm.

Average Wind Velocity was measured to be 4.0408m/s.

Wind Direction was conclusively consistent.

After analysis, this location was chosen as the most optimal for the Whisper 200, due to its constant wind direction and reliable wind velocity.

Page 27: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

BudgetExpenses Total Cost Reason Sources

Whisper 200 Nose Cone $32.00

Current nose cone on Whisper 200 is

damaged and needs

replacement.

https://www.renewableint

egrator.com/images/Whisper/

whisper_master_price_list_3-07.pdf

Wind Turbine Data Logger $333.50

Collects and records the power

generated by a Wind Turbine

http://www.altestore.com

/store/Meters-Communications-

Site-Analysis/Data-Communications/Outback-FlexNet-

DC/p6002/

Total $365.50

Page 28: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Looking at the FuturePhase IV

Determine the power output of the wind turbine at new location Install data logger to see how much is being produced.

How much money is saved?Monitor the wind turbine and see if any noise or

vibration issues ariseUse gathered data to tweak the design and

improve energy production.Restrict the turning mechanismDevelop channels to funnel the air

Page 29: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Gantt Chart

Page 30: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Title: Whisper 200 Analysis and RemediationTeam Members: Marko Sutovic, Timothy Smith, Thomas KudejAdvisor: Dr Basu, Dr Prasad Project #: 7 Date:12/15/09• Project Objectives Determine the temporal power output of a wind turbine as a function of average wind speed, time dependent wind direction, laminar and turbulent air flow.Determine a roof-top location for the given wind turbine where the power output is predicted to be relatively high in comparison with the current location of the Whisper 200 turbine atop the Babbio Center

• Results Obtained at This Point•CPA Location B•Average Wind Velocity•4.0408m/s

• Preliminary Design•Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis over proposed roof tops.•Babbio Test Results

•Wind measurement study•Howe Center Results

•Wind measurement study•Castle Point Apartments Results

•Wind measurement study•River Parking Lot Results

•Wind measurement study

Drawing and Illustration (Air Flow over Babbio)

• Detailed Design• Castle Point Apartments is the best area for relocation of the Whisper

200• Contains greatest constant directional flow out of all the areas tested• Has little to no obstructions in the coming wind direction which is

predominately North, North-West.

ME 423 Phase III Nugget Chart – Engineering Design

Page 31: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Thank you, Questions?

Page 32: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Appendix A: Full LabView Program

Page 33: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Appendix B: User Interface

Page 34: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Appendix C: Babbio Location A Wind Direction

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

Page 35: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

Appendix D: Babbio Location A Wind Speed

Page 36: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Appendix E: Babbio Location B Wind Direction

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

Page 37: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

Appendix F: Babbio Location B Wind Speed

Page 38: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Appendix G: Babbio Location C Wind Direction

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

Page 39: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

Appendix H: Babbio Location C Wind Speed

Page 40: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Appendix I: CPA Location A Wind Direction

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

Page 41: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

Appendix J: CPA Location A Wind Speed

Page 42: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Appendix K: CPA Location B Wind Direction

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

Page 43: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Day 1 Day 2

Day 3

Appendix L: CPA Location B Wind Speed

Page 44: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Appendix M: Howe Location A Wind Direction

Day 1 Day 2

Day 3

Page 45: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Day 1 Day 2

Day 3

Appendix N: Howe Location A Wind Speed

Page 46: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Appendix O: Howe Location B Wind Direction

Day 1 Day 2

Day 3

Page 47: Phase III Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.

Day 1 Day 2

Day 3

Appendix P: Howe Location B Wind Speed