By P. O. Box 295 2561 Stouffville Road, Suite 202 Gormley, Ontario L0H 1G0 Telephone (905) 887-6661 BARENCO INC. Phase II Environmental Assessment Thirteen Properties, High Park Project Toronto, Ontario March 5, 2008 Daniels HR Corporation 20 Queen Street West Suite 3400 Toronto, Ontario M5H 3R3 For 07126 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND SITE REMEDIATION SERVICES .
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
By
P. O. Box 295
2561 Stouffville Road, Suite 202
Gormley, Ontario
L0H 1G0
Telephone (905) 887-6661
BARENCO INC.
Phase IIEnvironmental Assessment
Thirteen Properties, High Park Project
Toronto, Ontario
March 5, 2008
Daniels HR Corporation20 Queen Street West
Suite 3400
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 3R3
For
07126
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND SITE REMEDIATION SERVICES
any decision made or any action taken based on this report or the work referredto in this report.
The investigation undertaken by Barenco Inc. with respect to this report andany conclusions or recommendations made in this report reflect Barenco Inc.'sjudgement based on the site conditions observed at the time of the siteinspection on the date(s) set out in this report and on information available atthe time of preparation of this report. This report has been prepared for specificapplication to this site and it is based, in part, upon visual observatiou of, thesite, subsurface investigation at discrete locations and depths, and specificanalysis of specific chemical parameters and materials during a specific timeinterval, all as described in this report. Unless otherwise stated, the findingscannot be extended to previous or future site conditions, portions of the sitewhich were unavailable for direct investigation, subsurface locations whichwere not investigated directly, or chemical parameters, materials or analysiswhich were not addressed. Substances other than those addressed by theinvestigation described in this report may exist within the site, substancesaddressed by the investigation may exist in areas of the site not investigated andconcentrations of substances addressed which are different than those reportedmay exist in areas other than the locations from which the samples were taken.
If site conditions or applicable standards change or if any additional informationbecomes available at a future date, modifications to the findings, conclusionsand recommendations in this report may be necessary.
Other than by Daniels HR Corporation, copying or distribution of this report orthe use of or reliance on the information contained herein, in whole or in part, isnot permitted without the express written permission of Barenco Inc. Nothingin this report is intended to constitute or provide a legal opinion.
Respectfully submitted,BARENCO INC.
-' f ro---"
~~OF "SIO~/ ' V "'<
. t;~:=~~:~ y \'#t, 1-\~ ~ Q
II) .... %
...: -~~:-f:.-E1;U M1 S T E R S
.(=~---\- ~ .o~~=~~:; ~ 00<
/I Jim Phimister, P .Eng, !.. '-
Principal, Hydrogeologist
March 5, 20088
Phase II Environmental AssessmentThirteen Properties, High Park Project, Toronto, Ontario
FIGURES
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
1FIGURE
SCALE: NOTES:
SOURCE:
DRAWN BY
07126-LOCALITY
C.D. V.K.
CHECKED BY
BARENCO JOB #: 07126 DATE: DECEMBER 2007
N
THIRTEEN PROPERTIES,HIGH PARK PROJECTTORONTO, ONTARIO
1:25000
LOCALITY PLAN
MAPART PUBLISHING 2005
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
SITE
2FIGURE
SCALE: SOURCE:
DRAWN BY
07126-SITE PLAN1-JAN08
M.A. B.C.
CHECKED BY
BARENCO JOB #: 07126 DATE: JANUARY 2008
N
THIRTEEN PROPERTIES,HIGH PARK PROJECTTORONTO, ONTARIO
SITE PLANCITY OF TORONTO PLANFIELD OBSERVATIONS BYBARENCO STAFF
SITE
0 20m
( APPROXIMATE)
10TEST HOLE WITHMONITOR DRILLEDIN JANUARY 2008
TEST HOLE DRILLED IN DECEMBER 2007
LEGEND:
BLOOR STREET WEST
PA
CIF
IC A
VE
NU
E
OA
KM
OU
NT
RO
AD
8
6
10
12
14
184418461848185018521854
35
37
GARAGE
SHED
TH106
TH101
TH104
TH105
TH102
TH103
FORMER USTEXCAVATION
TH3
TABLES
Table 1
SITE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING DATA
Site Location: Thirteen Properties, High Park Project, Toronto, Ontario Date: January 24, 2008
> 10-3 cm/s: Estimated to be 10-5 cm/s<10-3 to >10-6 cm/s:
< 10-6 cm/s: Estimated to be less than 50% Soil Particles < 75 Microns:
GROUND WATER
Approximately 15.6 to 15.9 metres below gradeDepth to Water Table: Measured from onsite monitorsEstimated or Measured: SouthDirection of Flow: Estimated based on topographyEstimated or Measured:
MUNICIPAL SERVICES
YesPiped Water: NoGround Water Source: NADistance to Well: Yes - Lake OntarioSurface Water Source: YesSanitary Sewer: YesStorm Sewer:
PRIVATE SERVICES
NADistance to Nearest Well: NAApproximate Depth of Well: NoPrivate Sanitary Sewage:
SURFACE WATER
Lake OntarioName of water body: Approximately 2 kilometres to the southDistance from site: UnknownElevation drop from site: NoDirect Drainage from site:
07126 BARENCO INC.
Table 2
DARCY'S LAW CALCULATIONS
Site Location: Thirteen Properties, High Park Project, Toronto, Ontario Date: January 24, 2008 v=ki/n
1.00E-07Permeability k (m/sec) =1.00E-05(cm/sec) =
0.010Gradient i (m/m) =2.50E-09Velocity v (m/sec) =0.4Porosity* n =8.20E-09(feet/sec) =7.08E-04(feet/day) =
Hydraulic conductivity for silty sandbased on published valuesGradient estimated based on slope of land
07126 BARENCO INC.
Table 3
SOIL CHEMICAL ANALYSIS - Petroleum Parameters Thirteen Properties, High Park Project, Toronto, Ontario
Page 1 of 2Test HoleTest HoleTest HoleTest HoleTest HoleTest HoleSampleTH103-17TH103-8TH102-15TH102-14TH101-15TH101-13
MOE15.8 to 16.59.0 to 9.615.2 to 15.814.5 to 15.115.2 to 15.813.7 to 14.3Depth (m)Table 3Silty sandSilty sandSilty sandSilty sandSilty sandSilty sandRDL*Soil Type
30nd220ndndnd9210F1 (C6 to C10 - BTEX)No valuend6.7ndnd<0.1370.2Aliphatic >C6 to C8No valuend170ndnd<0.414000.7Aliphatic >C8 to C10No valuend16ndnd<0.22000.1Aromatics >C8 to C10
150161900ndndnd290010F2 (C10 to C16)No valuena563nanana24605Aliphatic >C10 to C12No valuena54nanana925Aromatic >C10 to C12No valuena1800nanana757010Aliphatic >C12 to C16No valuena208nanana52515Aromatic >C12 to C16
400161400ndndnd220010F3 (C16 to C34)No valuena1320nanana608010Aliphatic >C16 to C21No valuena252nanana76210Aromatic >C16 to C21No valuena141nananand10Aliphatic >C21 to <C34No valuena161nanana35510Aromatic >C21 to <C34
2800ndndndndndnd10F4 (C34 to C50)No valuenandnananand10Aliphatic >C34No valuena58nanana4110Aromatic >C34
***7.917.897.787.967.967.80-pH
Analysis by Maxxam Analytics Inc. All results in ppm (ug/g) and based on dry weight basis; nd means "not detected" at reporting detection limit (RDL). na means "not applicable". * Analytical RDLs are shown except as indicated in brackets. ** Standards shown are for residential land use and coarse textured soils. *** pH range 5.0 to 9.0 for soil depths less than 1.5 m; pH range 5.0 to 11.0 for soil depths greater than 1.5 m Exceedances of Table 3 Standards are shown in bold.
07126 BARENCO INC.
Table 3
SOIL CHEMICAL ANALYSIS - Petroleum Parameters Thirteen Properties, High Park Project, Toronto, Ontario
Page 2 of 2Test HoleTest HoleTest HoleTest HoleTest HoleTest HoleSampleTH106-15TH106-14TH105-15TH105-14TH104-14TH104-12
MOE16.0 to 16.615.2 to 15.816.0 to 16.615.2 to 15.815.2 to 15.813.7 to 14.3Depth (m)Table 3Silty sandSilty sandSilty sandSilty sandSilty sandSilty sandRDL*Soil Type
30ndndndndndnd10F1 (C6 to C10 - BTEX)No valuendndndndndnd0.2Aliphatic >C6 to C8No valuendndndndndnd0.7Aliphatic >C8 to C10No valuendndndndndnd0.1Aromatics >C8 to C10
150ndndndndnd1210F2 (C10 to C16)No valuenananananana5Aliphatic >C10 to C12No valuenananananana5Aromatic >C10 to C12No valuenananananana10Aliphatic >C12 to C16No valuenananananana15Aromatic >C12 to C16
400ndndndndnd1210F3 (C16 to C34)No valuenananananana10Aliphatic >C16 to C21No valuenananananana10Aromatic >C16 to C21No valuenananananana10Aliphatic >C21 to <C34No valuenananananana10Aromatic >C21 to <C34
2800ndndndndndnd10F4 (C34 to C50)No valuenananananana10Aliphatic >C34No valuenananananana10Aromatic >C34
***7.958.028.027.947.957.91-pH
Analysis by Maxxam Analytics Inc. All results in ppm (ug/g) and based on dry weight basis; nd means "not detected" at reporting detection limit (RDL). na means "not applicable". * Analytical RDLs are shown except as indicated in brackets. ** Standards shown are for residential land use and coarse textured soils. *** pH range 5.0 to 9.0 for soil depths less than 1.5 m; pH range 5.0 to 11.0 for soil depths greater than 1.5 m Exceedances of Table 3 Standards are shown in bold.
07126 BARENCO INC.
Table 4
SOIL CHEMICAL ANALYSIS - Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Thirteen Properties, High Park Project, Toronto, Ontario
Page 1 of 1Test HoleTest HoleTest HoleSample
OntarioTH105-2TH104-2TH101-15Regulation 153/040.8 to 1.40.8 to 1.415.2 to 15.8Depth (m)
Table 3Silty sandSilty sandSilty sandRDL*Soil TypeSoil1/21/20081/18/20081/16/2008Sample Date
Analysis by Maxxam Analytics Inc. All results in ppm (ug/g) and based on dry weight basis; nd means "not detected" at reporting detection limit (RDL). * Analytical RDLs are shown except as indicated in brackets. ** Standards shown are for residential land use and coarse textured soils. *** pH range 5.0 to 9.0 for soil depths less than 1.5 m; pH range 5.0 to 11.0 for soil depths greater than 1.5 m Exceedances of Table 3 Standards are shown in bold.
07126 BARENCO INC.
Table 5
GROUND WATER CHEMICAL ANALYSIS - Petroleum Parameters Thirteen Properties, High Park Project, Toronto, Ontario
Page 1 of 1MOEMonitorMonitorMonitorMonitorMonitorMonitor
No valuendndndndndnd100F1 (C6 to C10 - BTEX)No valuendndndndndnd0.01Aliphatic >C6 to C8No valuendndnd0.01nd0.010.01Aliphatic >C8 to C10No valuendndndndndnd0.01Aromatics >C8 to C10
No valuend120ndndnd130100F2 (C10 to C16)No value0.03ndnd0.07nd0.450.01Aliphatic >C10 to C12No value0.03nd0.010.01nd0.150.01Aromatic >C10 to C12No value0.30ndnd0.15nd1.20.05Aliphatic >C12 to C16No value0.33ndnd0.05nd0.500.05Aromatic >C12 to C16
No valuend310ndndnd130100F3 (C16 to C34)No value0.36ndnd0.18nd1.20.05Aliphatic >C16 to C21No value0.33nd0.170.140.060.640.05Aromatic >C16 to C21No value0.1ndndndnd0.20.1Aliphatic >C21 to C32No value0.1nd0.1ndnd0.30.1Aromatic >C21 to C32
No valuendndndndndnd100F4 (C34 to C50)
Analysis by Maxxam Analytics Inc. All results in ppb (ug/L); nd means "not detected" at reporting detection limit (RDL). na means "not analysed". n/a means "not applicable". * Analytical RDLs are shown except as indicated in brackets. ** Standards shown are for residential land use and coarse textured soils. Exceedances of Table 3 Standards are shown in bold.
4January 7, 2008Proposal - Phase II Environmental A~~~ssmentThirteen Pr Ontario
attachment: Terms and Cqnditions
Barenco U}c. to proceed with the work.
"tOocg"j'A,.j \0Date
Page 1
Terms and Conditions
1. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED AND STANDARD OF CARE. Barenco Inc. ("Barenco") agrees to provide Client for its sole benefitand exclusive use, services set forth in Barenco's Proposal. Barenco's offer to perform shall be terminated if not accepted within sixty(60) days of the date of the Proposal. Barenco's services shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care of its professionwhich means generally accepted professional practices, related to the nature of the work accomplished, at the time and place theservices are performed. Subject to this standard of care, Barenco makes no express or implied warranties regarding its services exceptas otherwise expressly stated herein and all other representations and warranties, express or implied, are hereby expressly excluded.Both parties agree that no third-party beneficiaries are intended by this Agreement. 2. PAYMENT. Invoices will be submitted once a month for services performed during the prior month, or upon completion of the work,whichever is earlier. Payment terms are due upon receipt. Interest will be added to accounts thirty (30) days in arrears at the rate oftwo per cent (2%) of the arrears for each month of delinquency, not to exceed the maximum percentage rate allowed by law. In addition,Barenco may, after giving seven (7) days written notice, suspend services under this or any other Agreement with Client without liabilityuntil all past due accounts (including fees and accrued interest) have been paid. Timely payment is an essential requirement of Client'sperformance of any Agreement between Barenco and Client. All expenses incurred by Barenco for liening or collecting any delinquentamount including, without limitation, legal and other third-party fees and filing fees, shall be paid to Barenco by Client.3. RIGHT OF ENTRY AND PROPERTY RESPONSIBILITY. Client has responsibility for obtaining a right of entry to the property whichis the subject of the services. The right of entry shall allow Barenco, its agents, subcontractors and employees to enter the property,including buildings if required to complete the services as proposed, from time to time, as necessary to perform the agreed services.Barenco has responsibility for its own activities on the property including the safety of its employees; it does not assume control of norresponsibility for the property, the person in charge of the property, nor the safety of persons not in Barenco's employ. 4. INSURANCE. Barenco maintains Workers' Compensation insurance for its employees as required by provincial law. In addition,Barenco maintains the following insurance policies: Commercial General Liability, Pollution Liability and Professional Liability($1,000,000) each occurrence, $1,000,000 Policy Aggregate) and Automobile Third Party Liability ($2,000,000).5. DOCUMENTS. Barenco will furnish Client the agreed upon number of written reports and supporting documents. All such reportsand documents are furnished for Client's exclusive internal use and reliance, use of Client's counsel, and for regulatory submission asexpressly contemplated in connection with the services provided for in the Agreement, but not for advertising or other type of distribution,and are subject to the following: All documents generated by Barenco under this Agreement shall remain the sole property of Barenco.Any unauthorized use or distribution of Barenco's work shall be at Client's and recipient's sole risk and without liability to Barenco.Barenco retains a confidential file copy of its work product and related documents. If Client desires to release, or for Barenco to provide,its report to a third party, which is not entitled to receive or use the reports and documents as set out above, for that third party'sreliance, Barenco will agree to such release provided it receives written acceptance from such third party to be bound by acceptableterms and conditions similar to this Agreement, and provided payment by such third party of Barenco's standard fee. Reports providedfor disclosure of information only will not require separate agreement. Client acknowledges and agrees to inform such third party thatBarenco's report reflects conditions only at the time of the report and may not reflect conditions at a later time. Client furtheracknowledges that such request for release creates a potential conflict of interest for Barenco and by making any such request Clientwaives any such claim if Barenco complies with the request. Client agrees that all documents furnished to Client or Client's agent ordesignees, if not paid for, will be returned upon demand and will not be used by Client or any other person or entity for any purposewhatsoever. Client further agrees that documents produced by Barenco pursuant to this Agreement will not be used for any purposenot expressly provided for in this Agreement without Barenco's prior written approval. Client shall furnish documents or other informationreasonably within Client's control and deemed necessary by Barenco for proper performance of its services. Barenco may rely, withoutindependent investigation or enquiry, upon Client-provided documents in performing the services required under this Agreement;however, Barenco assumes no responsibility or liability for their accuracy. Client-provided documents will remain the property of Clientbut Barenco may retain one confidential file copy as needed to support its report. 6. CONFIDENTIALITY. Barenco will maintain as confidential any documents or information provided by Client and will not release,distribute or publish same to any third party without prior permission from Client, unless compelled by law or by order of a court orregulatory authority of competent jurisdiction. 7. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. All concepts, products, processes, inventions, trade-marks, works, designs and improvements to,and derivatives of, the foregoing, resulting from the services rendered by Barenco in connection with the project, or which are invented,authored, developed or first used or reduced to practise by Barenco in the performance of the services shall be and remain the propertyof Barenco. Client shall have a personal non-exclusive, royalty-free, non-assignable, non-sublicensable licence to use the IntellectualProperty in connection with the project, for the life of the project, and for no other purpose or project. Barenco does not make anyrepresentation or warranty that such Intellectual Property does not violate the rights of any other person. 8. WASTE. Client warrants that, if it knows or suspects that "waste" (within the meaning of the Ontario Environmental Protection Act)may exist on the property, it has so informed Barenco. Client also agrees that Barenco accepts no ownership of any waste and has noresponsibility as a generator of any waste found or identified at the project property. 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. CLIENT EXPRESSLY AGREES THAT, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMIT TED BY LAW, ITSMAXIMUM AGGREGATE RECOVERY AGAINST BARENCO, ITS DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, SUB-CONTRACTORS ANDREPRESENTATIVES, FOR ANY AND ALL CLAIMS BY CLIENT FOR ALL CAUSES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CLAIMSOF BREACH OF CONTRACT, BREACH OF WARRANTY AND/OR NEGLIGENCE, SHALL BE THE AMOUNT OF THE FEE PAID TOBARENCO FOR ITS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED UNDER THE AGREEMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE PARTICULARSITE WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THE CLAIM BY CLIENT. PROVIDED THAT, IF THERE IS AN EVENTUAL FINALDETERMINATION BY A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION OF GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT BYBARENCO, THEN THE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE RECOVERY SHALL BE LIMITED AS FOLLOWS: THE GREATER OF (A) THE FEEOR (B) THE LESSER OF TWO TIMES (2x) THE FEE AND $25,000.
Page 2
Terms and Conditions (cont.)
10. INDEMNIFICATION. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Client agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold Barenco, its agents,subcontractors, and employees harmless from and against any and all claims, defence costs, including legal fees, damages and otherliabilities arising out of or in any way related to Barenco's reports or recommendations concerning this Agreement, Barenco’s presenceon the project property, or the presence, release or threatened release of contaminants on or from the project property provided thatClient shall not indemnify Barenco against liability for damages caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of Barenco, its agents,subcontractors or employees or against penalties or fines resulting from violations by Barenco of its own Certificates of Approval; andprovided further that Client shall indemnify Barenco against liability for damages caused by or resulting from the concurrent orcontributory negligence of (a) Client, its agents, or employees and (b) Barenco, its agents, subcontractors, or employees, only to theextent of Client's negligence or the negligence of Client's agents or subcontractors. Provided further that Barenco's obligation hereundershall not extend to indemnification or holding harmless for any claims of loss of profits or any other indirect, special, incidental, orconsequential damages of any nature whatsoever. 11. UNFORESEEN OCCURRENCES. If any unforeseen conditions or occurrences are encountered which, in Barenco's judgement,significantly affect or may affect the original services as proposed, then Barenco will promptly notify Client. After such notification, theparties agree that Barenco has the unilateral right to complete the original services as proposed, if appropriate, or agree with Client tomodify the Agreement, or terminate the Agreement. 12. TERMINATION AND RESTART. In the event that Client requests termination of work prior to completion or Barenco terminateswork under Paragraph 11, a final invoice will be rendered. Where the method of payment is based on time and materials, Barenco willbe paid for all work performed up to notice of termination and for all expenses incurred or committed to that cannot be cancelled. Wherethe method of payment is based on a fixed price, the final invoice will be based on the percentage of work completed by the date oftermination. Barenco also has the right to complete at client's expense the analyses and records Barenco considers necessary to protectits professional reputation. 13. WELL ABANDONMENT. Any monitoring wells installed as part of Barenco's work may later need to be abandoned in accordancewith applicable law. Unless expressly provided for in the proposal, well abandonment is not included in the work. 14. DISPOSAL OF SAMPLES. Samples not submitted for analysis will be discarded 90 days after sampling unless differentarrangements are agreed to in writing. 15. SUBSURFACE RISKS AND SITE DAMAGE. Client recognizes that special risks occur and guarantees cannot be expectedwhenever professional consulting services are applied to determine the composition of a site's subsurface or the existence or non-existence of waste materials. Barenco cannot eliminate these risks altogether, but Barenco can apply professional techniques to reducethe risks to a level deemed tolerable and Client agrees to accept that level of risk. Whenever Barenco is providing field services, Clientrecognizes that the use of exploration and test equipment may unavoidably damage or alter the property surface or subsurface. Barencowill not be responsible for personal and property damages due to its interference with subterranean structures, such as pipes, tanks,and utility lines that are not called to Barenco's attention in writing or correctly shown on plans provided by Client, or for which clearancescannot be obtained from utility owners or their agents, or which are incorrectly cleared by utility owners or their agents. 16. SEVERABILITY AND SURVIVAL. Any element of this Agreement later held to violate a law shall be deemed void, and all remainingprovisions shall continue in force. However, Client and Barenco will in good faith attempt to replace any invalid or unenforceableprovision with one that is valid and enforceable, and which comes as close as possible to expressing the intent of the original provision.All terms and conditions of this Agreement allocating liability between Client and Barenco shall survive the completion of the serviceshereunder and the termination of the Agreement. 17. DISPUTES RESOLUTION. All matters in dispute howsoever caused may with the consent of both parties be referred to arbitration.The award of the arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the parties. The provisions of the Ontario Arbitrations Act, 1991, shall apply.Alternatively, if the dispute requires litigation, (a) Client assents to exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Province of Ontario (b) theclaim will be brought and tried in the judicial jurisdiction where Barenco's principal place of business is located and Client waives theright to move the action to any other judicial jurisdiction and (c) the prevailing party will be entitled to recovery of all reasonable costsincurred, including staff time, court costs, legal fees and other claim-related expenses. 18. PRECEDENCE. These terms and conditions shall take precedence over any inconsistent or contradictory provisions contained inany proposal, contract, purchase order, requisition, or like document concerning Barenco's services. 19. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the Province of Ontario. 20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, together with Barenco's Proposal, constitutes the entire agreement between Client andBarenco pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all other agreements, understandings, negotiations anddiscussions, whether oral or written. There are no conditions, warranties, representations or other agreements between the parties inconnection with the subject matter of this Agreement (whether oral or written, express or implied, statutory or otherwise) except asspecifically set out in this Agreement. Barenco shall not be bound or deemed to be bound by any other document or instrument issuedby the Client, including without limitation, purchase orders, requisitions, or contracts unless a duly authorized officer of Barenco expressly agrees in writing to be bound by the terms of such documents or instruments, notwithstanding that documents or instruments maystate otherwise. 21. PREPARATION OF AGREEMENT. Notwithstanding any rule or maxim of law or construction to the contrary, the parties agree thatany ambiguity or uncertainty contained in this Agreement shall not be construed against Barenco merely because this Agreement wasdrafted or prepared by or on behalf of Barenco.
EQUIPMENT: Track Mount DrillTOP OF GROUND ELEVATION:
Overcast, -7C
GROUND WATER DEPTH: 15.59m. (24/01/2008)
SITE: Thirteen PropertiesADDRESS: High Park Project, Toronto ON
UTM: 483 45 39Northing Easting 62 39 81
SA
MP
LE
#
CO
UN
T
BL
OW
TY
PE
RE
AD
ING
VA
PO
UR
RE
CO
VE
RY
%
ST
RA
TA
PL
OT
DE
PT
H (
M)
DE
PT
H (
M)
ANALYSISREQUESTED
DESCRIPTION OFSTRATIGRAPHY MONITOR
TOP OF MONITOR ELEVATION: NANA
(Blo
ws
per
ft)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Continued...
1 SS 01/02/03/02 ND 65%
0.6
2 SS 01/02/03/04 ND 75%
1.4
0.8
3 SS 10/13/13/16 25 85%PPM
2.1
1.5
4 SS 10/09/11/12 ND 90%
3.7
3.0
5 SS 10/14/20/21 ND 100%
5.2
4.6
6 SS 07/22/25/22 25 75%PPM
6.7
6.1
7 SS 08/16/20/28 ND 100%
8.2
7.6
8 SS 10/30/39/40 25 100%PPM
9.8
9.1
TOPSOIL : Dark brown, soft, TOPSOIL, moist. 0.1SILTY SAND : Light brown, loose to very dense,SAND, fine grained, becomes coarse grained at13.2m, silty, damp, wet at 15.2m, petroleum odourbetween 13.7m and 14.3m and between 15.2mand 15.9m.
BARENCOLEGEND: AU = Auger Sample SS = Split Spoon GR = Grab SampleND = non detect NM = not measured due to insufficient sample volume
PROJECT #
TECHNICIAN
07126
D.Doherty
TEST HOLE LOG TH101DRILL DATE: January 16, 2008
SHEET#
WEATHER:
TWO of TWO
EQUIPMENT: Track Mount DrillTOP OF GROUND ELEVATION:
Overcast, -7C
GROUND WATER DEPTH: 15.59m. (24/01/2008)
SITE: Thirteen PropertiesADDRESS: High Park Project, Toronto ON
UTM: 483 45 39Northing Easting 62 39 81
SA
MP
LE
#
CO
UN
T
BL
OW
TY
PE
RE
AD
ING
VA
PO
UR
RE
CO
VE
RY
%
ST
RA
TA
PL
OT
DE
PT
H (
M)
DE
PT
H (
M)
ANALYSISREQUESTED
DESCRIPTION OFSTRATIGRAPHY MONITOR
TOP OF MONITOR ELEVATION: NANA
(Blo
ws
per
ft)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
16.76 m - END OF TEST HOLE
9 SS 11/29/24/29 25 20%PPM
11.3
10.7
10 SS 10/22/34/32 ND 100%
12.0
11.4
11 SS 09/27/41/42 25 90%PPM
12.8
12.2
12 SS 08/32/37/50 ND 90%13.6
13.3
13 SS 07/16/29/24 175 90% BTEX-F1toF4-pHPPM
14.3
13.7
14 SS 05/10/17/19 ND 90%
15.1
14.5
15 SS 03/10/13/15 150 90% BTEX-F1toF4-PAHs-pHPPM
15.8
15.2
16 SS 04/15/27/32 50 100%PPM
16.6
16.0
SILTY SAND : Light brown, loose to very dense,SAND, fine grained, becomes coarse grained at13.2m, silty, damp, wet at 15.2m, petroleum odourbetween 13.7m and 14.3m and between 15.2mand 15.9m.
16.6
BARENCOLEGEND: AU = Auger Sample SS = Split Spoon GR = Grab SampleND = non detect NM = not measured due to insufficient sample volume
PROJECT #
TECHNICIAN
07126
D.Doherty
TEST HOLE LOG TH102DRILL DATE: January 17, 2008
SHEET#
WEATHER:
ONE of TWO
EQUIPMENT: Track Mount DrillTOP OF GROUND ELEVATION:
Overcast, -1C
GROUND WATER DEPTH: 15.56m. (24/01/2008)
SITE: Thirteen PropertiesADDRESS: High Park Project, Toronto ON
UTM: 483 45 39Northing Easting 62 39 81
SA
MP
LE
#
CO
UN
T
BL
OW
TY
PE
RE
AD
ING
VA
PO
UR
RE
CO
VE
RY
%
ST
RA
TA
PL
OT
DE
PT
H (
M)
DE
PT
H (
M)
ANALYSISREQUESTED
DESCRIPTION OFSTRATIGRAPHY MONITOR
TOP OF MONITOR ELEVATION: NANA
(Blo
ws
per
ft)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Continued...
1 SS 01/02/02/02 ND 85%
0.6
2 SS 01/02/02/01 ND 85%
1.4
0.8
3 SS 02/06/07/08 25 85%PPM
2.1
1.5
4 SS 03/08/11/11 25 90%PPM
3.7
3.0
5 SS 06/11/17/12 50 90%PPM
5.2
4.6
6 SS 05/10/12/15 50 85%PPM
6.7
6.1
7 SS 07/20/27/35 ND 90%
8.2
7.6
8 SS 10/31/45/40 25 100%PPM
9.8
9.1
TOPSOIL : Dark Brown, very soft, TOPSOIL, damp.0.2
SILTY SAND : Light Brown, very loose to verydense, SAND, medium/fine grained, damp, wet at15.2m, petroleum odour between 14.5m and15.1m.
BARENCOLEGEND: AU = Auger Sample SS = Split Spoon GR = Grab SampleND = non detect NM = not measured due to insufficient sample volume
PROJECT #
TECHNICIAN
07126
D.Doherty
TEST HOLE LOG TH102DRILL DATE: January 17, 2008
SHEET#
WEATHER:
TWO of TWO
EQUIPMENT: Track Mount DrillTOP OF GROUND ELEVATION:
Overcast, -1C
GROUND WATER DEPTH: 15.56m. (24/01/2008)
SITE: Thirteen PropertiesADDRESS: High Park Project, Toronto ON
UTM: 483 45 39Northing Easting 62 39 81
SA
MP
LE
#
CO
UN
T
BL
OW
TY
PE
RE
AD
ING
VA
PO
UR
RE
CO
VE
RY
%
ST
RA
TA
PL
OT
DE
PT
H (
M)
DE
PT
H (
M)
ANALYSISREQUESTED
DESCRIPTION OFSTRATIGRAPHY MONITOR
TOP OF MONITOR ELEVATION: NANA
(Blo
ws
per
ft)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
16.76 m - END OF TEST HOLE
9 SS 08/21/41/40 ND 100%
11.3
10.7
10 SS 08/21/28/30 25 100%PPM
12.0
11.4
11 SS 08/13/36/47 25 100%PPM
12.8
12.2
12 SS 06/12/15/17 25 90%PPM
13.6
13.0
13 SS 05/17/21/23 25 90%PPM
14.3
13.7
14 SS 05/14/23/26 25 90% BTEX-F1toF4-pHPPM
15.1
14.5
15 SS 12/06/08/13 25 85% BTEX-F1toF4-pHPPM
15.8
15.2
16 SS 12/05/12/10 25 85%PPM
16.6
16.0
SILTY SAND : Light Brown, very loose to verydense, SAND, medium/fine grained, damp, wet at15.2m, petroleum odour between 14.5m and15.1m.
16.6
BARENCOLEGEND: AU = Auger Sample SS = Split Spoon GR = Grab SampleND = non detect NM = not measured due to insufficient sample volume
PROJECT #
TECHNICIAN
07126
D. Doherty
TEST HOLE LOG TH103DRILL DATE: January 17, 2008
SHEET#
WEATHER:
ONE of TWO
EQUIPMENT: Track Mount DrillTOP OF GROUND ELEVATION:
Overcast, -1C
GROUND WATER DEPTH: 15.62m. (24/01/2008)
SITE: Thirteen PropertiesADDRESS: High Park Project, Toronto ON
UTM: 483 45 39Northing Easting 62 39 81
SA
MP
LE
#
CO
UN
T
BL
OW
TY
PE
RE
AD
ING
VA
PO
UR
RE
CO
VE
RY
%
ST
RA
TA
PL
OT
DE
PT
H (
M)
DE
PT
H (
M)
ANALYSISREQUESTED
DESCRIPTION OFSTRATIGRAPHY MONITOR
TOP OF MONITOR ELEVATION: NANA
(Blo
ws
per
ft)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Continued...
1 SS 06/18/21/22 ND 100%
4.3
3.7
2 SS 08/12/15/14 25 90%PPM
5.0
4.4
3 SS 08/11/18/24 150 85%PPM
5.8
5.2
4 SS 11/24/34/32 100 85%PPM
6.6
5.9
5 SS 05/07/11/17 125 100%PPM
7.3
6.7
6 SS 05/14/38/56 200 100%PPM
8.1
7.5
7 SS 10/39/38/50 275 100%PPM
8.8
8.2
8 SS 09/31/41/35 425 100% BTEX-F1toF4-pHPPM
9.6
9.0
9 SS 11/40/50/50 150 85%9.8
FILL : Light brown, dense, SAND (FILL), damp.
4.3SILTY SAND : Light Brown, compact to verydense, SAND, medium/fine grained, silty, damp,wet at 15.1m, petroleum odour and stainingbetween 5.2m and 15.7m.
BARENCOLEGEND: AU = Auger Sample SS = Split Spoon GR = Grab SampleND = non detect NM = not measured due to insufficient sample volume
PROJECT #
TECHNICIAN
07126
D. Doherty
TEST HOLE LOG TH103DRILL DATE: January 17, 2008
SHEET#
WEATHER:
TWO of TWO
EQUIPMENT: Track Mount DrillTOP OF GROUND ELEVATION:
Overcast, -1C
GROUND WATER DEPTH: 15.62m. (24/01/2008)
SITE: Thirteen PropertiesADDRESS: High Park Project, Toronto ON
UTM: 483 45 39Northing Easting 62 39 81
SA
MP
LE
#
CO
UN
T
BL
OW
TY
PE
RE
AD
ING
VA
PO
UR
RE
CO
VE
RY
%
ST
RA
TA
PL
OT
DE
PT
H (
M)
DE
PT
H (
M)
ANALYSISREQUESTED
DESCRIPTION OFSTRATIGRAPHY MONITOR
TOP OF MONITOR ELEVATION: NANA
(Blo
ws
per
ft)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
16.76 m - END OF TEST HOLE
9 SS 11/40/50/50 150 85%PPM
10.4
10 SS 04/23/25/40 125 85%PPM
11.1
10.5
11 SS 10/24/25/50 300 85%PPM
11.9
11.3
12 SS 10/21/30/45 250 85%PPM
12.6
12.0
13 SS 08/28/37/41 250 85%PPM
13.4
12.8
14 SS 06/23/36/50 250 100%PPM
14.2
13.6
15 SS 20/27/29/32 250 100%PPM
14.9
14.3
16 SS 05/14/35/27 275 100%PPM
15.7
15.1
17 SS 08/22/27/27 100 100% BTEX-F1toF4-pHPPM
16.5
15.8
SILTY SAND : Light Brown, compact to verydense, SAND, medium/fine grained, silty, damp,wet at 15.1m, petroleum odour and stainingbetween 5.2m and 15.7m.
16.6
BARENCOLEGEND: AU = Auger Sample SS = Split Spoon GR = Grab SampleND = non detect NM = not measured due to insufficient sample volume
PROJECT #
TECHNICIAN
07126
D. Doherty
TEST HOLE LOG TH104DRILL DATE: January 18, 2008
SHEET#
WEATHER:
ONE of TWO
EQUIPMENT: Truck Mount DrillTOP OF GROUND ELEVATION:
Overcast, -5C
GROUND WATER DEPTH: 15.86m. (24/01/2008)
SITE: Thirteen PropertiesADDRESS: High Park Project, Toronto ON
UTM: 483 45 39Northing Easting 62 39 81
SA
MP
LE
#
CO
UN
T
BL
OW
TY
PE
RE
AD
ING
VA
PO
UR
RE
CO
VE
RY
%
ST
RA
TA
PL
OT
DE
PT
H (
M)
DE
PT
H (
M)
ANALYSISREQUESTED
DESCRIPTION OFSTRATIGRAPHY MONITOR
TOP OF MONITOR ELEVATION: NANA
(Blo
ws
per
ft)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Continued...
1 SS 01/01/01/01 ND 100%
0.6
2 SS 02/02/02/02 25 65% PAHs-pHPPM
1.4
0.8
3 SS 03/06/12/11 ND 100%
2.1
1.5
4 SS 07/14/14/19 25 85%PPM
3.7
3.0
5 SS 07/16/18/24 25 90%PPM
5.2
4.6
6 SS 07/10/17/22 25 85%PPM
6.7
6.1
7 SS 10/20/25/31 25 100%PPM
8.2
7.6
8 SS 06/16/13/13 25 100%PPM
9.8
9.1
TOPSOIL : Dark Brown, very soft, TOPSOIL, damp. 0.1SILTY SAND : Light Brown, very loose to verydense, SAND, medium/fine grained, silty, damp,wet at 15.2m, petroleum odour between 13.7mand 14.3m.
BARENCOLEGEND: AU = Auger Sample SS = Split Spoon GR = Grab SampleND = non detect NM = not measured due to insufficient sample volume
PROJECT #
TECHNICIAN
07126
D. Doherty
TEST HOLE LOG TH104DRILL DATE: January 18, 2008
SHEET#
WEATHER:
TWO of TWO
EQUIPMENT: Truck Mount DrillTOP OF GROUND ELEVATION:
Overcast, -5C
GROUND WATER DEPTH: 15.86m. (24/01/2008)
SITE: Thirteen PropertiesADDRESS: High Park Project, Toronto ON
UTM: 483 45 39Northing Easting 62 39 81
SA
MP
LE
#
CO
UN
T
BL
OW
TY
PE
RE
AD
ING
VA
PO
UR
RE
CO
VE
RY
%
ST
RA
TA
PL
OT
DE
PT
H (
M)
DE
PT
H (
M)
ANALYSISREQUESTED
DESCRIPTION OFSTRATIGRAPHY MONITOR
TOP OF MONITOR ELEVATION: NANA
(Blo
ws
per
ft)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
16.76 m - END OF TEST HOLE
9 SS 10/20/24/32 50 100%PPM
11.3
10.7
10 SS 05/23/30/33 50 90%PPM
12.8
12.2
11 SS 07/20/26/30 25 85%PPM
13.6
13.0
12 SS 04/14/23/23 75 75% BTEX-F1toF4-pHPPM
14.3
13.7
13 SS 05/11/14/15 50 85%PPM
15.1
14.5
14 SS 02/12/25/25 50 85% BTEX-F1toF4-pHPPM
15.8
15.2
15 SS 04/15/18/25 25 85%PPM
16.6
16.0
SILTY SAND : Light Brown, very loose to verydense, SAND, medium/fine grained, silty, damp,wet at 15.2m, petroleum odour between 13.7mand 14.3m.
16.8
BARENCOLEGEND: AU = Auger Sample SS = Split Spoon GR = Grab SampleND = non detect NM = not measured due to insufficient sample volume
PROJECT #
TECHNICIAN
07126
D. Doherty
TEST HOLE LOG TH105DRILL DATE: January 21, 2008
SHEET#
WEATHER:
ONE of TWO
EQUIPMENT: Truck Mount DrillTOP OF GROUND ELEVATION:
Clear, -15C
GROUND WATER DEPTH: 15.58m. (24/01/2008)
SITE: Thirteen PropertiesADDRESS: High Park Project, Toronto ON
UTM: 483 45 39Northing Easting 62 39 81
SA
MP
LE
#
CO
UN
T
BL
OW
TY
PE
RE
AD
ING
VA
PO
UR
RE
CO
VE
RY
%
ST
RA
TA
PL
OT
DE
PT
H (
M)
DE
PT
H (
M)
ANALYSISREQUESTED
DESCRIPTION OFSTRATIGRAPHY MONITOR
TOP OF MONITOR ELEVATION: NANA
(Blo
ws
per
ft)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Continued...
1 SS 01/01/01/01 ND 60%
0.6
2 SS 02/02/03/02 ND 60% PAHs-pH
1.4
0.8
3 SS 02/03/04/07 ND 75%
2.1
1.5
4 SS 07/10/14/20 ND 90%
3.7
3.0
5 SS 06/10/15/25 25 85%PPM
5.2
4.6
6 SS 05/19/21/30 25 90%PPM
6.7
6.1
7 SS 10/20/22/26 25 100%PPM
8.2
7.6
8 SS 08/21/24/30 25 75%PPM
9.8
9.1
TOPSOIL : Dark Brown, very soft, TOPSOIL, damp. 0.1SILTY SAND : Light Brown, very loose to verydense, SAND, medium/fine grained, silty, damp,wet at 16.0m, petroleum odour between 13.7mand 16.6m.
BARENCOLEGEND: AU = Auger Sample SS = Split Spoon GR = Grab SampleND = non detect NM = not measured due to insufficient sample volume
PROJECT #
TECHNICIAN
07126
D. Doherty
TEST HOLE LOG TH105DRILL DATE: January 21, 2008
SHEET#
WEATHER:
TWO of TWO
EQUIPMENT: Truck Mount DrillTOP OF GROUND ELEVATION:
Clear, -15C
GROUND WATER DEPTH: 15.58m. (24/01/2008)
SITE: Thirteen PropertiesADDRESS: High Park Project, Toronto ON
UTM: 483 45 39Northing Easting 62 39 81
SA
MP
LE
#
CO
UN
T
BL
OW
TY
PE
RE
AD
ING
VA
PO
UR
RE
CO
VE
RY
%
ST
RA
TA
PL
OT
DE
PT
H (
M)
DE
PT
H (
M)
ANALYSISREQUESTED
DESCRIPTION OFSTRATIGRAPHY MONITOR
TOP OF MONITOR ELEVATION: NANA
(Blo
ws
per
ft)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
16.76 m - END OF TEST HOLE
9 SS 08/21/26/32 50 90%PPM
11.3
10.7
10 SS 06/24/29/50 50 90%PPM
12.8
12.2
11 SS 11/21/35/50 50 90%PPM
13.6
13.0
12 SS 08/12/21/31 25 65%PPM
14.3
13.7
13 SS 06/18/29/40 50 90%PPM
15.1
14.5
14 SS 13/27/31/26 100 85% BTEX-F1toF4-pHPPM
15.8
15.2
15 SS 06/07/09/12 100 50% BTEX-F1toF4-pHPPM
16.6
16.0
SILTY SAND : Light Brown, very loose to verydense, SAND, medium/fine grained, silty, damp,wet at 16.0m, petroleum odour between 13.7mand 16.6m.
16.8
BARENCOLEGEND: AU = Auger Sample SS = Split Spoon GR = Grab SampleND = non detect NM = not measured due to insufficient sample volume
PROJECT #
TECHNICIAN
07126
D. Doherty
TEST HOLE LOG TH106DRILL DATE: January 21, 2008
SHEET#
WEATHER:
ONE of TWO
EQUIPMENT: Truck Mount DrillTOP OF GROUND ELEVATION:
Clear, -15C
GROUND WATER DEPTH: 15.61m. (24/01/2008)
SITE: Thirteen PropertiesADDRESS: High Park Project, Toronto ON
UTM: 483 45 39Northing Easting 62 39 81
SA
MP
LE
#
CO
UN
T
BL
OW
TY
PE
RE
AD
ING
VA
PO
UR
RE
CO
VE
RY
%
ST
RA
TA
PL
OT
DE
PT
H (
M)
DE
PT
H (
M)
ANALYSISREQUESTED
DESCRIPTION OFSTRATIGRAPHY MONITOR
TOP OF MONITOR ELEVATION: NANA
(Blo
ws
per
ft)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Continued...
1 SS 06/02/02/03 ND 40%
0.6
2 SS 02/05/03/01 ND 50%
1.4
0.8
3 SS 02/03/05/06 25 60%PPM
2.1
1.5
4 SS 07/12/10/21 ND 85%
3.7
3.0
5 SS 05/16/18/31 ND 90%
5.2
4.6
6 SS 08/21/23/28 ND 75%
6.7
6.1
7 SS 05/21/24/29 25 90%PPM
8.2
7.6
8 SS 10/20/23/29 50 90%PPM
9.8
9.1
TOPSOIL : Dark Brown, soft, TOPSOIL, damp.0.2
SILTY SAND : Light Brown, loose to very dense,SAND, medium/fine grained, silty, damp, wet at15.2m.
BARENCOLEGEND: AU = Auger Sample SS = Split Spoon GR = Grab SampleND = non detect NM = not measured due to insufficient sample volume
PROJECT #
TECHNICIAN
07126
D. Doherty
TEST HOLE LOG TH106DRILL DATE: January 21, 2008
SHEET#
WEATHER:
TWO of TWO
EQUIPMENT: Truck Mount DrillTOP OF GROUND ELEVATION:
Clear, -15C
GROUND WATER DEPTH: 15.61m. (24/01/2008)
SITE: Thirteen PropertiesADDRESS: High Park Project, Toronto ON
UTM: 483 45 39Northing Easting 62 39 81
SA
MP
LE
#
CO
UN
T
BL
OW
TY
PE
RE
AD
ING
VA
PO
UR
RE
CO
VE
RY
%
ST
RA
TA
PL
OT
DE
PT
H (
M)
DE
PT
H (
M)
ANALYSISREQUESTED
DESCRIPTION OFSTRATIGRAPHY MONITOR
TOP OF MONITOR ELEVATION: NANA
(Blo
ws
per
ft)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
16.76 m - END OF TEST HOLE
9 SS 12/21/24/34 25 85%PPM
11.3
10.7
10 SS 12/24/37/42 25 90%PPM
12.8
12.2
11 SS 10/20/26/30 25 85%PPM
13.6
13.0
12 SS 10/20/34/36 25 90%PPM
14.3
13.7
13 SS 10/21/30/38 50 85%PPM
15.1
14.5
14 SS 05/21/23/28 50 45% BTEX-F1toF4-pHPPM
15.8
15.2
15 SS 12/24/34/26 50 70% BTEX-F1toF4-pHPPM
16.6
16.0
SILTY SAND : Light Brown, loose to very dense,SAND, medium/fine grained, silty, damp, wet at15.2m.
16.8
BARENCOLEGEND: AU = Auger Sample SS = Split Spoon GR = Grab SampleND = non detect NM = not measured due to insufficient sample volume
���������
���������������� ���������������
Attached are copies of the original Certificates of Analysis provided by thelaboratory. The data contained in these analyses is to be read only inconjunction with the report to which it is attached. For interpretation ofthe chemical data, see the attached text.
All samples are submitted to and reported by the laboratory usingpurchase order numbers and sample location codes. These are onlydiscernable to persons familiar with the purchase order system and thelocation codes. For descriptions of the locations of the samples, see theattached text.
Not all data contained in the original laboratory certificate of analysis mayhave been referenced in the report. Samples may have been submitted astravel or field blanks or as duplicates. Some samples may be for controlpurposes and represent soil that is no longer on the site and is notrelevant to the report.
Since the laboratory data contains scientific terms and references, onlytrained persons familiar with sampling and laboratory methods shouldattempt to interpret the raw data.
Your P.O. #: 07126 Your Project #: 07126 Your C.O.C. #: 00553371
Attention: Bernard ChanBarenco Inc2561 Stouffville RdPO Box 295Gormley, ONL0H 1G0
Report Date: 2008/02/04
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
MAXXAM JOB #: A805178Received: 2008/01/17, 14:24
Sample Matrix: Soil# Samples Received: 2
Date Date MethodAnalyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method ReferenceTEH in Soil (AA PIRI) ( 1 ) 2 N/A 2008/01/23 ATL SOP 00116 R2 Based on Atl. PIRI Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil 2 2008/01/21 2008/01/22 CAM SOP-00315 CCME CWS Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Soil 2 2008/01/21 2008/01/21 CAM SOP-00316 CCME CWS Moisture ( 1 ) 2 N/A 2008/01/21 ATL SOP 00001 R2 MOE Handbook 1983 MOISTURE 2 N/A 2008/01/19 Ont SOP-0114 MOE HANDBOOK(1983) PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM) 1 2008/01/18 2008/01/18 SOP - 00318 EPA 8270 pH CaCl2 EXTRACT 2 N/A 2008/01/23 Ont SOP-0067 4 5 0 0 - H + B VPH in Soil (PIRI2) ( 1 ) 2 N/A 2008/01/22 ATL SOP 00120 R2 Based on Atl. PIRI ModTPH (T2) Calc. for Soil ( 1 ) 2 N/A 2008/01/24 n/a Based on Atl. PIRI
* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.
(1) This test was performed by Bedford
Encryption Key
Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.
SARA SAROOP, Campobello Customer serviceEmail: [email protected]# (905) 817-5700 Ext:5819
====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved this reporting process and electronic report format.
For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page
ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch( 1 ) Elevated VPH RDL(s) due to sample dilution.( 2 ) Fuel oil fraction. TEH surrogate(s) not within acceptance limits. Analysis was repeated withsimilar results.
ND = Not detectedNC = Non-calculableRPD = Relative Percent DifferenceSPIKE = Fortified sample( 1 ) The extraction surrogate recovery is not calculated due to Matrix interferences.( 2 ) Matrix spike recoveries were not calculated (NC) because of high concentration of target compounds in the parent sample.( 3 ) The recovery in the matrix spiked is not calculated (NC) due to high concentration of this compound in the parent sample.
Page 10 of 11
Validation Signature Page
Maxxam Job #: A805178
The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).
BRAD NEWMAN, Scientific Specialist
JAMES MACDONALD, Organics Manager
MEDHAT RISKALLAH, Manager, Hydrocarbon Department
MICHAEL WANG,
SUZANA POPOVIC, Supervisor, Hydrocarbons
====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 ofISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved this reporting process and electronic report format.
Page 11 of 11
Your Project #: MA805178 Site: 07126
Attention: SUB CONTRACTORMAXXAM ANALYTICS INC.CAMPOBELLO6740 CAMPOBELLO ROADMISSISSAUGA, ONCANADA L5N 2L8
Report Date: 2008/02/01
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
MAXXAM JOB #: A802778Received: 2008/01/21, 10:35
Sample Matrix: Soil# Samples Received: 2
Date DateAnalyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Analytical MethodCCME Hydrocarbons (F2-F4 in soil) 2 2008/01/22 2008/01/22 CAL SOP-00086 CCME PHC-CWS Aliphatic and Aromatic Fractions C10-C50 1 2008/01/22 2008/01/30 CAL SOP-00184 CCME PHC-CWS Moisture 2 N/A 2008/01/22 CAL SOP-00023 McKeague MSSMA 2.411
* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.
Encryption Key
Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.
====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved this reporting process and electronic report format.
For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page
The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).
LUBA SHYMUSHOVSKA,
VERONICA FALK,
====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 ofISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved this reporting process and electronic report format.
Page 7 of 7
Your P.O. #: 07126 Your Project #: 07126 Your C.O.C. #: 00553374
Attention: Bernard ChanBarenco Inc2561 Stouffville RdPO Box 295Gormley, ONL0H 1G0
Report Date: 2008/02/05
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
MAXXAM JOB #: A806235Received: 2008/01/21, 14:55
Sample Matrix: Soil# Samples Received: 7
Date Date MethodAnalyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method ReferenceTEH in Soil (AA PIRI) ( 1 ) 6 N/A 2008/01/25 ATL SOP 00116 R2 Based on Atl. PIRI Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil 6 2008/01/22 2008/01/22 CAM SOP-00315 CCME CWS Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Soil 6 2008/01/22 2008/01/22 CAM SOP-00316 CCME CWS Moisture ( 1 ) 6 N/A 2008/01/23 ATL SOP 00001 R2 MOE Handbook 1983 MOISTURE 7 N/A 2008/01/23 Ont SOP-0114 MOE HANDBOOK(1983) PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM) 1 2008/01/23 2008/01/23 SOP - 00318 EPA 8270 pH CaCl2 EXTRACT 7 N/A 2008/01/25 Ont SOP-0067 4 5 0 0 - H + B VPH in Soil (PIRI2) ( 1 ) 6 N/A 2008/01/25 ATL SOP 00120 R2 Based on Atl. PIRI ModTPH (T2) Calc. for Soil ( 1 ) 6 N/A 2008/01/28 n/a Based on Atl. PIRI
* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.
(1) This test was performed by Bedford
Encryption Key
Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.
SARA SAROOP, Campobello Customer serviceEmail: [email protected]# (905) 817-5700 Ext:5819
====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved this reporting process and electronic report format.
For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page
ND = Not detectedN/A = Not ApplicableNC = Non-calculableRPD = Relative Percent DifferenceSPIKE = Fortified sample( 1 ) The recovery in the matrix spike was not calculated (NC). Because of the high concentration of this analyte in the parent sample, therelative difference between the spiked and unspiked concentrations is not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable recovery calculation.( 2 ) Duplicate results exceeded RPD acceptance criteria due to sample heterogeneity.
Page 12 of 13
Validation Signature Page
Maxxam Job #: A806235
The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).
EWA PRANJIC, M.Sc., C.Chem, Scientific Specialist
GREG GILBERT, Scientific Specialist
MEDHAT RISKALLAH, Manager, Hydrocarbon Department
ALINA SEGAL, Manager Main Lab - Organics
SUZANA POPOVIC, Supervisor, Hydrocarbons
====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 ofISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved this reporting process and electronic report format.
Page 13 of 13
Your Project #: MA806235 Site: 07126
Attention: SUB CONTRACTORMAXXAM ANALYTICS INC.CAMPOBELLO6740 CAMPOBELLO ROADMISSISSAUGA, ONCANADA L5N 2L8
Report Date: 2008/02/01
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
MAXXAM JOB #: A803092Received: 2008/01/23, 8:50
Sample Matrix: Soil# Samples Received: 6
Date DateAnalyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Analytical MethodCCME Hydrocarbons (F2-F4 in soil) 6 2008/01/24 2008/01/24 CAL SOP-00086 CCME PHC-CWS Aliphatic and Aromatic Fractions C10-C50 1 2008/01/22 2008/01/30 CAL SOP-00184 CCME PHC-CWS Moisture 6 N/A 2008/01/24 CAL SOP-00023 McKeague MSSMA 2.411
* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.
Encryption Key
Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.
====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved this reporting process and electronic report format.
For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page
Maxxam ID I 6 4 4 2 2 I 6 4 4 4 7 I 6 4 4 4 8 I 6 4 4 4 9Sampling Date 2008/01/17 2008/01/17 2008/01/17 2008/01/17 U n i t s TH102-15 THIO2-14 TH103-17 TH103-8 R D L QC Batch
Maxxam ID I 6 4 4 2 2 I 6 4 4 4 7 I 6 4 4 4 8 I 6 4 4 4 9Sampling Date 2008/01/17 2008/01/17 2008/01/17 2008/01/17 U n i t s TH102-15 THIO2-14 TH103-17 TH103-8 R D L QC Batch
The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).
LUBA SHYMUSHOVSKA,
VERONICA FALK,
====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 ofISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved this reporting process and electronic report format.
Page 8 of 8
Your P.O. #: 07126 Your Project #: 07126 Your C.O.C. #: 00553375
Attention: Bernard ChanBarenco Inc2561 Stouffville RdPO Box 295Gormley, ONL0H 1G0
Report Date: 2008/01/29
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
MAXXAM JOB #: A806695Received: 2008/01/22, 14:58
Sample Matrix: Soil# Samples Received: 5
Date Date MethodAnalyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method ReferenceTEH in Soil (AA PIRI) ( 1 ) 4 N/A 2008/01/29 ATL SOP 00116 R2 Based on Atl. PIRI Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil 4 2008/01/23 2008/01/24 CAM SOP-00315 CCME CWS Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Soil 4 2008/01/25 2008/01/25 CAM SOP-00316 CCME CWS Moisture ( 1 ) 4 N/A 2008/01/25 ATL SOP 00001 R2 MOE Handbook 1983 MOISTURE 5 N/A 2008/01/25 Ont SOP-0114 MOE HANDBOOK(1983) PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM) 1 2008/01/24 2008/01/24 SOP - 00318 EPA 8270 pH CaCl2 EXTRACT 5 N/A 2008/01/28 Ont SOP-0067 4 5 0 0 - H + B VPH in Soil (PIRI2) ( 1 ) 4 N/A 2008/01/25 ATL SOP 00120 R2 Based on Atl. PIRI ModTPH (T2) Calc. for Soil ( 1 ) 4 N/A 2008/01/29 n/a Based on Atl. PIRI
* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.
(1) This test was performed by Bedford
Encryption Key
Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.
SARA SAROOP, Campobello Customer serviceEmail: [email protected]# (905) 817-5700 Ext:5819
====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved this reporting process and electronic report format.
For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page
ND = Not detectedN/A = Not ApplicableNC = Non-calculableRPD = Relative Percent DifferenceSPIKE = Fortified sample
Page 12 of 13
Validation Signature Page
Maxxam Job #: A806695
The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).
BRAD NEWMAN, Scientific Specialist
GREG GILBERT, Scientific Specialist
MEDHAT RISKALLAH, Manager, Hydrocarbon Department
SUZANA POPOVIC, Supervisor, Hydrocarbons
TIM MUNSHAW, Lab Manager
====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 ofISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved this reporting process and electronic report format.
Page 13 of 13
Your Project #: MA806695 Site: 07126
Attention: SUB CONTRACTORMAXXAM ANALYTICS INC.CAMPOBELLO6740 CAMPOBELLO ROADMISSISSAUGA, ONCANADA L5N 2L8
Report Date: 2008/01/28
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
MAXXAM JOB #: A803322Received: 2008/01/24, 8:40
Sample Matrix: Soil# Samples Received: 4
Date DateAnalyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Analytical MethodCCME Hydrocarbons (F2-F4 in soil) 4 2008/01/24 2008/01/24 CAL SOP-00086 CCME PHC-CWS Moisture 4 N/A 2008/01/25 CAL SOP-00023 McKeague MSSMA 2.411
* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.
Encryption Key
Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.
====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved this reporting process and electronic report format.
For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page
Maxxam ID I 6 5 5 0 6 I 6 5 5 1 2 I 6 5 5 1 3 I 6 5 5 1 4Sampling Date 2008/01/21 2008/01/21 2008/01/21 2008/01/21 U n i t s TH106-14 TH105-15 TH105-14 TH106-15 R D L QC Batch
Maxxam ID I 6 5 5 0 6 I 6 5 5 1 2 I 6 5 5 1 3 I 6 5 5 1 4Sampling Date 2008/01/21 2008/01/21 2008/01/21 2008/01/21 U n i t s TH106-14 TH105-15 TH105-14 TH106-15 R D L QC Batch
The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).
LUBA SHYMUSHOVSKA,
====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 ofISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved this reporting process and electronic report format.
Page 6 of 6
Your P.O. #: 07126 Your Project #: 07126 Your C.O.C. #: 00553384
Attention: Bernard ChanBarenco Inc2561 Stouffville RdPO Box 295Gormley, ONL0H 1G0
Report Date: 2008/02/07
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
MAXXAM JOB #: A808263Received: 2008/01/25, 14:52
Sample Matrix: Water# Samples Received: 6
Date Date MethodAnalyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method ReferenceTEH in Water (AA PIRI) ( 1 ) 6 N/A 2008/02/07 ATL SOP 00116 R2 Based on Atl. PIRI Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Water 6 N/A 2008/01/29 CAM SOP-00315 CCME CWS Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2-F4 in Water 6 2008/01/29 2008/01/29 CAM SOP-00316 CCME Hydrocarbons VPH in Water (PIRI2) ( 1 ) 6 N/A 2008/02/04 ATL SOP 00120 R2 Based on Atl. PIRI ModTPH (T2) Calc. for Water ( 1 ) 6 N/A 2008/02/07 Based on Atl. PIRI
* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.
(1) This test was performed by Bedford
Encryption Key
Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.
SARA SAROOP, Campobello Customer serviceEmail: [email protected]# (905) 817-5700 Ext:5819
====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved this reporting process and electronic report format.
For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page
ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch( 1 ) Fuel oil fraction. TEH sample contained sediment. TEH surrogate(s) not within acceptance limits.Insufficient sample to repeat.( 2 ) TEH sample contained sediment.( 3 ) Weathered fuel oil fraction. One product in the fuel/lube oil range. TEH sample contained sediment. TEHsurrogate(s) not within acceptance limits. Insufficient sample to repeat.
ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch( 1 ) VPH analysis performed on previously opened vial.( 2 ) One product in the fuel/lube oil range. TEH sample contained sediment.( 3 ) TEH sample decanted due to sediment. TEH surrogate(s) not within acceptance limits.Insufficient sample to repeat.
13:30COC Number 00553384 U n i t s TH 106 R D L QC Batch
TPH COMPOUNDS
Benzene mg/L ND 0.001 1451710
Toluene mg/L ND 0.001 1451710
Ethylbenzene mg/L ND 0.001 1451710
Xylene (Total) mg/L ND 0.002 1451710
Aliphatic >C6-C8 mg/L ND 0.01 1451710
Aliphatic >C8-C10 mg/L ND 0.01 1451710
>C8-C10 Aromatics (-EX) mg/L ND 0.01 1451710
Aliphatic >C10-C12 mg/L 0.03 0.01 1449839
Aliphatic >C12-C16 mg/L 0.30 0.06 1449839
Aliphatic >C16-C21 mg/L 0.36 0.06 1449839
Aliphatic >C21-<C32 mg/L 0.1 0.1 1449839
Aromatic >C10-C12 mg/L 0.03 0.01 1449839
Aromatic >C12-C16 mg/L 0.33 0.06 1449839
Aromatic >C16-C21 mg/L 0.33 0.06 1449839
Aromatic >C21-<C32 mg/L 0.1 0.1 1449839
Modified TPH (Tier 2) mg/L 1.5 0.1 1449033
Surrogate Recovery (%)
Isobutylbenzene - Extractable % 77 1449839
Isobutylbenzene - Volatile % 121 ( 1 ) 1451710
n-Dotriacontane - Extractable % 76 ( 2 ) 1449839
ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch( 1 ) VPH analysis performed on previously opened vial.( 2 ) One product in the fuel/lube oil range. TEH sample containedsediment.
The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).
GREG GILBERT, Scientific Specialist
MEDHAT RISKALLAH, Manager, Hydrocarbon Department
SUZANA POPOVIC, Supervisor, Hydrocarbons
====================================================================Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 ofISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved this reporting process and electronic report format.