Top Banner
Pharmacodynamics Collected and Prepared By S.Bohlooli, PhD
42

Pharmacodynamics

Jan 01, 2016

Download

Documents

Yuri Santana

Pharmacodynamics. Collected and Prepared By S.Bohlooli, PhD. LOCUS OF ACTION “RECEPTORS ”. TISSUE RESERVOIRS. Bound. Free. Free. Bound. ABSORPTION. EXCRETION. Free Drug. SYSTEMIC CIRCULATION. Bound Drug. BIOTRANSFORMATION. Molecular pharmacology :. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Pharmacodynamics

Pharmacodynamics

Collected and Prepared By

S.Bohlooli, PhD

Page 2: Pharmacodynamics

Bound Free Free Bound

LOCUS OF ACTION

“RECEPTORS”TISSUE

RESERVOIRS

SYSTEMIC CIRCULATION

Free Drug

Bound Drug

ABSORPTION EXCRETION

BIOTRANSFORMATION

Page 3: Pharmacodynamics

Molecular pharmacology :

Molecular pharmacology is concerned with studies of basic mechanisms of drug actions on biological systems.

The idea that drugs act upon specific sites (receptive substance) began with John New Port Langley (1852-1926) of Cambridge.

However the word ‘receptor’ is given by Paul Ehrlich (1854- 19 15).

The receptor concept which forms a key note in the development of molecular pharmacology became firmly established by the quantitative work of Alfred Joseph Clark (1885-1941), a professor of pharmacology at Kings College London.

Page 4: Pharmacodynamics

Receptor (key element)

In addition to its usefulness for explaining biology, the receptor concept has important practical consequence for The development of drugs Arriving at therapeutic decisions in clinical

practice.

Page 5: Pharmacodynamics

Receptors:

Largely determine the quantitative relations between dose or concentration of drug and pharmacologic effects

Are responsible for selectivity of drug action

Mediate the actions of pharmacologic antagonists

Page 6: Pharmacodynamics

Macromolecular nature of drug receptors

Regulatory proteins

Enzymes

Transport proteins

Structural proteins

Page 7: Pharmacodynamics

Quantitative aspects of drug-receptor interaction

Page 8: Pharmacodynamics

Drug-Receptor Interactions Obey the Law Of Mass Action

effectDRRDk

k

1

2

2].[1].].[[ kDRkRD By law of mass action:

At equilibrium

][

]].[[

1

2

DR

RDK

k

kD

Therefore:

Page 9: Pharmacodynamics

Total number of receptors: Rt = [R] + [DR]

][

]].[[

DR

RDKD

[R] = Rt – [DR]

][

]].[[].[

][

])[].([

DR

DRDRD

DR

DRRDK ttD

After rearrangement:

][

].[][

DK

RDDR

D

t

][

][][

DK

D

R

DR

Dt

Page 10: Pharmacodynamics

KD

When [D] = KD

[DR] RT

= 0.5

[D]

[DR

]/R

t

0 5 10 15 200.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

][

][][

DK

D

R

DR

Dt

Page 11: Pharmacodynamics

Receptor Binding

The dose-response relationship (from C.D. Klaassen, Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology, 5th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996).

% B

oun

d

Concentration of Ligand

KD

Page 12: Pharmacodynamics

Relation between drug dose & clinical response

Page 13: Pharmacodynamics

1. Affinity for the receptor. Affinity is related to potency.

2. Efficacy once bound to the receptor. Efficacy refers to the maximal effect the drug can elicit.

Drugs are described based on the magnitude of two properties:

Page 14: Pharmacodynamics

AGONISTAGONIST - Has affinity for receptor and efficacy. - Has affinity for receptor and efficacy.

ANTAGONISTANTAGONIST - Has affinity but no efficacy. - Has affinity but no efficacy.

Competitive AntagonistCompetitive Antagonist Noncompetitive AntagonistNoncompetitive Antagonist

Partial AgonistPartial Agonist or Partial Antagonist or Partial Antagonist – – Has affinity but Has affinity but lowerlower efficacy than full agonist. efficacy than full agonist.

Agonists and Antagonists

Page 15: Pharmacodynamics

Receptor ligand types

Page 16: Pharmacodynamics

Full Agonists (i.e., equal efficacies) that Differ In Potency:

Drug Concentration (log scale)Drug Concentration (log scale)

% M

ax R

esp

onse

% M

ax R

esp

onse

AABB CC

Compare the EC50s

Page 17: Pharmacodynamics

Agonists That Differ in Efficacy

AA

BB

CC

Log Drug ConcentrationLog Drug Concentration

% M

ax r

esp

on

se%

Max

res

po

nse

Page 18: Pharmacodynamics
Page 19: Pharmacodynamics

Full and partial agonist occupancy and response relationship

0.0

50

100

0.01 0.1 1.0 10.0

Res

pons

e(%

)

Response(full agonist) Occupancy

(both)

Response(partial Agonist)

Concentration (umol/l)

Page 20: Pharmacodynamics

Inverse agonist

Inverse agonist can exist where an appreciable level of activation may exist even when no ligand is present For example: receptors for benzodiazepines, cannabinoidsand dopamine

Under such condition it may be possible for a ligand to reduce the level of activation. such drugs are known as inverse agonist

Page 21: Pharmacodynamics

Competitive Antagonism Shifts The Agonist D-R Curve (Potency)

Drug Concentration (log Drug Concentration (log scale)scale)

% M

ax R

esp

onse

% M

ax R

esp

onse AG + ANTAG + ANTAG aloneAG alone

EC50EC50

Page 22: Pharmacodynamics

Noncompetitive Antagonism Decreases Agonist Efficacy

Log Drug ConcentrationLog Drug Concentration

% M

ax r

esp

on

se%

Max

res

po

nse

AG aloneAG alone

AG + NC ANTAG + NC ANT

AG + higher doseAG + higher doseNC ANTNC ANT

Page 23: Pharmacodynamics

Receptors are said to be ‘spare’ for a given pharmacologicalresponse when the maximal response can be elicited by anagonist at a concentration that not result in occupancy of thefull complement of available receptors

Spare receptor

Emax

Log Concentration

Res

pone

s(%

) Agonist alone

Agonist with noncompetitive antagonist in

presence of spare receptor

Agonist with noncompetitive antagonist in absence of

spare receptor

Page 24: Pharmacodynamics

R R’

LR LR’

L L EffectNo effect

Possible mechanism for the partial agonist phenomenon.

Agonist like to bind to receptor in R’ state and shifts the equilibrium toward more LR’ and makes effect

Antagonist like to bind to receptor in R and R” state without any preference and makes no shifts in net equilibrium

Partial agonist has a little more affinity for receptor in R’ states than R state and makes partial effect

Inverse agonist has more affinity to receptor in R state and shifts the equilibrium toward more LR and make negative response than resting state.

Page 25: Pharmacodynamics

Desensitization and Tachyphylaxis

DesensitizationToleranceRefractorinessDrug resistance

Changes in receptor

Loss of receptor

Exhaustion of mediators

Increased metabolic degradation

Physiological adaptation

Active extrusion of drug from cells

How?

Page 26: Pharmacodynamics

Drug Antagonism

Pharmacologic

Chemical

Pharmacokinetic

Physiologic

Dimercaprol & heavy metals

Propranolol & norepinephrine

Phenobarbital & warfarine

Epinephrine & histamine

Page 27: Pharmacodynamics

Signaling mechanism &

drug action

Page 28: Pharmacodynamics

Type of receptors

Ligand gated ion channels

G protein coupled receptors

Ligand-Regulated Transmembrane Enzymes

Including Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Cytokine Receptors

Intracellular receptors

Page 29: Pharmacodynamics

-amino butyric acid (GABA) Glycine Aspartate Glutamate Acethylcholine Serotonin

Ligand gated ion channel (iontropic receptors)

Page 30: Pharmacodynamics

R

Ligand gated ion channel (iontropic receptors)

ions

Hyper polarizationor

depolarization

Cellular effects

Page 31: Pharmacodynamics

Adernocorticotropic hormone Acetylcholine Angiotensin Catecholamines Chrionic gonadotropin Follicle stimulating hormone Glucagon Histamine Luteinizing Hormone Seretonin Vasopressin

G protein coupled receptors

Page 32: Pharmacodynamics

R

+E

G G- + -

Ions

Second messengersChange inexcitability

Ca2+ release Protein phosphorylation

other

Cell effects

G protein coupled receptors

Page 33: Pharmacodynamics

Ligand -regulated transmembrane enzyme including receptor tyrosine kinases Insulin Epidermal growth factor (EGF) Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) Arterial natriuretic factor (ANF) Transforming growth factor (TGF- )

Cytokine receptors Growth hormone Erythropoietin Interferones

Kinase linked receptors

Page 34: Pharmacodynamics

R/E

Protein phosphorylation

Gene transcription

Protein synthesis

Cellular effects

Kinase linked receptors

Page 35: Pharmacodynamics
Page 36: Pharmacodynamics
Page 37: Pharmacodynamics

R

Nucleus

Gene transcription

Protein synthesis

Cellular effects

Nuclear receptors

Page 38: Pharmacodynamics
Page 39: Pharmacodynamics

Well Established Second Messengers

Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (cAMP) Calcium and Phosphoinositides Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP)

Page 40: Pharmacodynamics
Page 41: Pharmacodynamics
Page 42: Pharmacodynamics

Good Luck