Top Banner
Medical profiling and online medicine: The ethics of ‘personalised healthcare’ in a consumer age A guide to the report
16

Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

Nov 01, 2014

Download

Health & Medicine

benj_2

 
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

Medical profiling and online medicine:

The ethics of ‘personalised healthcare’ in a consumer age

A guide to the report

Page 2: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

Table of contents

Introduction 01

Whatis‘personalisedhealthcare’? 02

Ethics 03

Intervention 04

Casestudies Onlinehealthinformation 05 Onlinepersonalhealthrecords 06 Buyingmedicinesonline 08 Telemedicine 09 Personalgeneticprofiling 10 Bodyimaging 11

Conclusions 12

Page 3: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

01

IntroductionThisguidesummarisestheconclusionsandrecommendationsthatarediscussedinmoredetailintheNuffieldCouncilonBioethics’reportMedical profiling and online medicine: The ethics of ‘personalised healthcare’ in a consumer age(publishedOctober2010).

NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

Newdevelopmentsinmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicinearepromisedbytheirprovidersasleadingtoaneweraof‘personalisedhealthcare’.Thesedevelopmentsinclude:

•direct-to-consumerbodyimaging(e.g.CTandMRIscans)andpersonalgeneticprofilingasahealthcheck

•theincreaseinwebsitesthatprovidehealthadvice,diagnosis,storageofhealthrecords,andmedicinesforsale.

Thetechnologiesbehindthesedevelopmentsarealreadybeingusedinpositiveways.Forexample,theUK’sNationalHealthService(NHS)usesapprovedgeneticteststodetectraregeneticdisorders.Weexplorethemorecontroversialusesofthesetechnologies,andtheextenttowhichtheyreallydoleadtohealthcarebecomingmorepersonalised.

Notesinsquarebracketsrefertothechaptersinthereport.

Page 4: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

02 NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS02 NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

What is ‘personalised healthcare’?Theterm‘personalisation’hasbecomeverywidespread,withmanycompanies,policymakersanddoctorsclaimingthatthisisthefutureofhealthcare.

Wefoundseveralmeaningsfor‘personalisedhealthcare’.Forexample,itcanmeanhealthcarethatistailoredtoaperson’sspecificcharacteristics,orhealthcarewheremoreresponsibilityisgiventoindividualsratherthanmedicalprofessionals[Chapter1].

LinkswithresponsibilisationandconsumerisationSomeofthesetypesofpersonalisedhealthcarecorrespondwithtwokeysocialpressures,called‘responsibilisation’and‘consumerisation’.Thesepressuresarenotjustrelevanttohealthcare,butpresentparticularethicalchallengesforthedevelopmentsbeingconsideredinthisreport.

‘Responsibilisation’

PolicymakersintheUKandelsewhereoftenencouragepeopletotakemoreresponsibilityfortheirownhealth–toleadahealthylifestyleandplayanactiveroleinmanagingtheirhealthcare.Developmentsinmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicinecanprovidenewtoolstoenablepeopletotakemoreresponsibilityfortheirhealth.

‘Consumerisation’

Thereisnothingnewaboutbeingabletoselectandpayforhealthcareintheprivatesector,buttodayevenpublichealthcareservicesareaimingtobecomemoreuserfocused.Aconsumeristapproachtohealthcareandthenewtechnologiesavailablehavebeenseizeduponbyfirmsofferingmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicineservices[Chapter2].

Page 5: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

0303NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

Ethics Thefollowingfiveethicalvaluesareimportantwhenconsideringdevelopmentsinmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicine:

1Privateinformationshouldbesafeguarded.

2Individualsshouldbeabletopursuetheirowninterestsintheirownway.

3Thestateshouldacttoreduceharm.

4Publicresourcesshouldbeusedfairlyandefficiently.

5Socialsolidarity(sharingrisksandworkingtogethertoprotectthevulnerable)shouldinformpublicpolicy.

ConflictingethicalvaluesTheseethicalvaluesoftenconflictwithoneanother.Allareimportantandnoonevalue‘trumps’another.

Inthefollowingcasestudies,weexaminethebenefitsandharmsineachsituation.Wethenattemptto‘soften’theconflictsbetweentheethicalvaluesbyrespectingeachofthemasmuchaspossibleandmakingrecommendationsthatareevidence-based,proportionateandfeasible[Chapter3].

Page 6: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

04 NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

Intervention Ifthereisbroadagreementthatanewdevelopmentinmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicineislikelytocausesignificantharm,theninterventionbygovernmentsorotherorganisationsisjustified.

TypesofinterventionCoercivevsnon-coerciveSomeinterventionsinvolveformalstate-specificformsofcoercion,suchaslawsandregulations,whileothersdonot,suchasvoluntarycodesofconductoreducationcampaigns.

SpecificvsgeneralSomeinterventionsarespecifictotheproductorserviceinquestion,whileothersaremoregeneral,forexamplegeneralprofessionalcodesorrulesaboutdataprotection.

ChoosinginterventionsTheinterventionshouldbeproportionatetotheproblem.Lesscoerciveinterventionsshouldbeexploredfirst,unlessthedegreeofharminaparticularcasemeritsamorestringenttypeofintervention.

Moregeneralformsofinterventionareoftenpreferabletomoreservice-orproduct-specificones,particularlywheretechnologyisrapidlychangingandspecificrulescanquicklybecomeoutdated.

Interventionsshouldalsobefeasible.Theremaybetimeswhenmeasurescouldnotrealisticallybeenforced,wouldbeveryexpensiveorcouldhavenegativesideeffects[Chapter4].

Page 7: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

05NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

OnlinehealthinformationPeoplehavealwaysbeenabletoaccesshealthinformationinnewspapersandmagazines,buttheinternethasopeneduparangeofnewpossibilitiesforconvenientlyfindingandexchanginginformationonhealth.Thiscanincreasepeople’sinvolvementintheirownhealthandprovidethemwithvaluablesupportfromothers.

However,itisdifficultforpeopletoassesstheaccuracyofinformationtheyaregettingonline,andtheymaynotknowwhohasaccesstoanypersonalinformationtheysubmit.Therearenostrongincentivesforinformationproviderstofollowbestpractice.

Thebestwebsitesarebasedonhighqualityresearch,originatefromanindependentnot-for-profitorganisation,areindependentlyevaluatedandcontinuouslyupdated.

Weconclude…•Allwebsitescontaininghealthinformationshouldcontain

keydetailsabout,forexample,thebasisoftheinformation,theauthors,fundingarrangements,andhowanypersonaldatawillbeused.Websitesshouldseekaccreditationfromrecognisedschemes.

•Governmentsshouldensurethathighqualityhealthinformationisavailableontheinternetanddoctorsshoulddirectpatientstothesesites.

•Doctorsshouldreceivetrainingandadviceoncaringforpatientswhousetheinternettoaccessinformationaboutdiagnosisandtreatment[Chapter5].

Case studies

Page 8: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

06 NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

OnlinepersonalhealthrecordsBothpublicandprivatehealthcareprovidersarestartingtoofferonlinehealthrecordsservices.

ThroughitsHealthSpacewebsite,theNHScurrentlyintendstoprovideeveryoneinEnglandwithonlineaccesstoasummaryoftheirmedicalrecords,includinginformationabouttheircurrentandpasthealthproblems,medicationandallergies.

Severalcommercialcompanies,mainlyintheUS,provideservicesthatallowpeopletoorganisetheirpersonalhealthinformation,integratehealthrecordsfromdifferentproviders,andsharethemwithotherpeople,includinghealthcareprofessionals.

Theseservicesallowmoreconvenientandpatient-centredcontrolofhealthrecords.However,thereispotentialformisuseofstoredinformation.

Weconclude…•Governmentsshouldsetupaccreditationschemesforonline

healthrecordproviderstoimprovetransparencyandstandardsonhowpersonalinformationisstoredandused.Providersoftheseservicesshouldseekaccreditationfromsuchschemes.

•Duringthesigning-upprocess,onlinehealthrecordprovidersshouldprovidepotentialuserswithinformationaboutdatasecurityandlegalrights.

•ResponsiblebodiesintheEU,suchastheUKInformationCommissioner’sOffice,shouldapplyEuropeanUniondataprotectionlegislationtoonlinehealthrecordsusedbypeopleintheEU[Chapter6].

Case studies continued

Page 9: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

07NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

Page 10: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

08 NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

BuyingmedicinesonlineOnlinepharmaciescanallowpeopletobuymedicinesconvenientlyandprivately.GreatBritainhasaregistrationsystemforonlinepharmaciestohelppeopleidentifylegitimatewebsites.

Theinternetcanalsobeusedtobuymedicinesforwhichpeopledonothaveaprescriptionandwhichareillegalintheircountry.Peopledoingthisriskbuyingharmful,fakeorlowqualitymedicinesandcouldmissoutonadviceofferedbydoctorsandpharmacists.Itcouldalsoleadtoanincreaseinantibioticresistancearisingfrommisuseofantibiotics.

Theextentofanyharmcurrentlybeingcausedisnotknownbutthepotentialforharmisgreat.Aswithallonlineservices,theinternationalnatureoftheproblemmakesitadifficultareatoregulate.

Weconclude…•Registrationschemesforonlinepharmacies,suchastheone

inGreatBritain,shouldbemirroredinothercountries.

•Governmentwebsitesshouldprovideinformationabouttherisksofbuyingmedicinesonlineandhowtoidentifyaregisteredonlinepharmacy.

•Doctorsshouldreceivetrainingandadviceonhowtodealwithpatientswhomaybebuyingmedicinesonline.

•Governmentsworldwideshouldsetandenforceregulationsonthesupplyofantibioticsintheircountry[Chapter7].

Case studies continued

Page 11: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

09

TelemedicineTelemedicinereferstoanyhealthcarethatinvolvescommunicationstechnologyandanelementofdistance.Itincludespatientsanddoctorscommunicatingwitheachotherelectronically,andmedicaldevicesbeingoperatedremotely.

Althoughsometypesofcarewillalwaysneedtobedeliveredinperson,telemedicinehasthepotentialtooffercaretopeopleintheirownhomeandincreaseequitableaccesstohealthcareservices.

Telemedicinecouldhaveaparticularlypositiveimpactindevelopingcountries,forexample,byenablingdoctorstoseekexpertopinionsfromspecialistsindevelopedcountries.Telemedicinemayalsohaveanimpactonthe‘braindrain’effectofdoctorsmovingfromdevelopingcountriestoworkindevelopedcountries.

Therehasbeenlittleresearchontheimpactofdifferenttypesoftelemedicineondoctor-patientrelationshipsoronwhethertheybringcostsavings.

Weconclude…•Publichealthcaresystemsshouldoffertelemedicine

serviceswheretheycanfeasiblyandcost-effectivelyhelptoreduceinequitiesinaccesstohealthcare.Anyimpactsonthedoctor-patientrelationshipshouldbeevaluated.

•Internationalagenciesshouldencouragetelemedicinenetworksindevelopingcountrieswheretheyareshowntobebeneficial,cost-effectiveandsustainable.

•Developedcountriesshouldmonitoranyimpactsofoutsourcingtheirhealthcareservicestodevelopingcountriesviatelemedicine,forexampleonthe‘braindrain’effect[Chapter8].

NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

Page 12: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

10 NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

PersonalgeneticprofilingSeveralcompanies,mainlyUS-based,nowofferpersonalgeneticprofilingservicesfordiseasesusceptibility.AfteranalysingasampleofDNA(e.g.fromasalivasamplesentinthepost),theyclaimtobeabletotellhealthypeopleabouttheirrisksofdevelopingcommondiseasesinfuture,suchascancer,Parkinson’sdiseaseanddiabetes.TheseservicescancostuptoUS$2000.

Thetestsmightprovidereassuranceorenablepeopletotakepreventativeaction.However,thereareanumberofpotentialdownsides:

•Thetestresultscanbeunreliableanddifficulttointerpret.

•‘Good’resultsmayleadtocomplacencyinlifestyle.

•Learningaboutriskofdiseasecouldbeupsetting,particularlyifnotreatmentsareavailable.

•Thereispotentialformisuseofpersonalgeneticinformation.

•Peoplemayseekunnecessaryfurthertestsoradvicefromtheirdoctor.

Thenumberofpeopleusinggeneticprofilingservicesandwhetherthisiscurrentlyleadingtoanyactualharmisnotknown.

Weconclude…•Regulatorsshouldrequestevidenceforanyclaimsbeingmadeby

companiesabouttheclinicalvalueoftheirtests.

•Governmentwebsitesshouldprovideinformationabouttherisksandbenefitsofpersonalgeneticprofiling,includingtherelevanceforinsurance.

•CompaniesshouldnotknowinglyanalysetheDNAofchildrenunlesscertaincriteriaaremet.

•Doctorsshouldreceivetrainingongivingadvicetopatientsaboutcommercialgeneticprofilingservices.

•Companiesshouldvoluntarilyprovideclearinformationonthelimitationsofgeneticprofilingandwhatwillhappentopeople’sdata[Chapter9].

Case studies continued

Page 13: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

11

BodyimagingCommercialcompaniesarenowofferingpeoplea‘healthMOT’usingbodyimagingtechnologiessuchasCTandMRIscans.Theyclaimtolookforearlysignsofconditionssuchascancerandheartdisease,andcancostmorethan£1000.

Thetestscanputpeople’smindsatrest,orencouragethemtoseektreatmentandmakelifestylechanges.However,thereareanumberofpotentialdownsides:

•CTscansexposepeopletoradiation,whichcanbeharmful.

•Theresultscanbedifficulttointerpret.

•MRIscansoftenpickup‘abnormalities’whichareactuallyharmless,butwhichcouldleadtounnecessaryanxietyandfurtherinvasivetests.

•Thereispotentialformisuseofpersonalhealthinformation.

Thenumberofpeopleusingdirect-to-consumerbodyimagingservicesandwhetherthisiscurrentlyleadingtoanyactualharmisnotknown.

Weconclude…•Companiesthatsellbodyimagingservicesasahealthcheck

shouldberegulatedtoensuretheyaremeetingstandardsofqualityandsafety.

•Direct-to-consumerwholebodyCTimagingshouldbebanned.Part-bodyCTscansshouldonlytakeplaceifitisinthebestinterestsofthecustomer.

•Governmentwebsitesshouldprovideinformationabouttherisksandbenefitsofcommercialbodyimaging,includingtherelevanceforinsurance.

•Companiesshouldvoluntarilyprovideclearinformationonthelimitationsofdirect-to-consumerbodyimaging,andwhatwillhappentopeople’sdata.

•Doctorsshouldreceivetrainingongivingadvicetopatientsaboutdirect-to-consumerbodyimagingservices[Chapter10].

NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

Page 14: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

12 NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

Conclusions

PersonalisationAllthedevelopmentsinmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicineconsideredinthereportofferincreased‘personalisation’tosomeextent.Butmanyoftheclaimsformoreindividualiseddiagnosisandtreatmentseemtobeoverstatedandshouldbetreatedwithcautionatthepresenttime.Forexample,commercialgeneticprofilingandbodyimaginghavethepotentialtotailorhealthcaretotheindividual,butthatpotentialhasyettobefullyrealised.

ConsumerisationAllthedevelopmentsconsideredbythereportcanlendthemselvestotheprovisionofhealthcareasaconsumergood.Wethinkchoiceisoftenagoodthing,buttoworkeffectivelyinhealthcareitneedstobeaccompaniedbyproperinformationandadvice.

Wealsoneedtofindwaysofbalancingindividualchoicewiththeprincipleofsocialsolidarity–i.e.thatweshouldsharetheresponsibilitytohelppeopleinneed.

ResponsibilisationThedevelopmentsconsideredinthisreportcanleadtonewobligationsandexpectationsfortheindividualswhousethem.Forexample,onlinepersonalhealthrecordssystemscanplacenewdemandsonindividualstochecktheirrecordsandensuretheirsecurity.

Wethinkresponsibilityforhandlingnewrisksassociatedwiththesedevelopmentsshouldbeplacedinthehandsofthosebestplacedtomanageit.Insomecasesthisisthestate,insomecasesthemedicalprofessional,andinothercasestheindividual.Eachcaseneedstobeconsideredonitsownmerits.

Page 15: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)
Page 16: Personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

Copiesofthereportandthisguideareavailabletodownloadat:www.nuffieldbioethics.org

Toorderaprintedcopy,[email protected]

PublishedbyNuffieldCouncilonBioethics28BedfordSquareLondonWC1B3JS

Telephone:+44(0)2076819619

©NuffieldCouncilonBioethics2010

PublishedOctober2010

SummaryNewdevelopmentsinmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicinearepromisedbytheirprovidersasleadingtoaneweraof‘personalisedhealthcare’.

‘Personalisedhealthcare’canhavedifferentmeanings,includinghealthcarethatistailoredtotheindividualandhealthcarethatgivesmoreresponsibilitytotheindividual.

Anumberofnewdevelopmentsinmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicineareconsideredascasestudies:

•Personalgeneticprofiling

•Direct-to-consumerbodyimaging

•Onlinehealthinformation

•Buyingmedicinesonline

•Onlinepersonalhealthrecords

•Telemedicine

Thebenefitsandharmsofeachareweighedup,alongwiththeethicalvaluesthatcomeintoplay,suchasindividualsbeingabletopursuetheirowninterestsandeffortsbythestatetoreduceharm.Wequestionthedegreeofpersonalisationachievedbythenewdevelopmentsandalsotheirimplicationsfor‘consumerisation’and‘responsibilisation’ofhealthcare.Recommendationsforpolicyandpracticearemadeineachcase.