Top Banner
PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Jari Laru 28.9.2012 University of Oulu
12

PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Jari Laru 28.9.2012 University of Oulu.

Jan 19, 2018

Download

Documents

Nigel Quinn

Propietary, homogeneous, and centrally administered LMS Behind closed doors, used mainly for distribution
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Jari Laru 28.9.2012 University of Oulu.

PERSONAL LEARNING

ENVIRONMENTSJari Laru

28.9.2012University of Oulu

Page 2: PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Jari Laru 28.9.2012 University of Oulu.

Mobiles Web 2.0

LMS (Optima, Blackboard)

Commercial Free

Page 3: PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Jari Laru 28.9.2012 University of Oulu.

Propietary, homogeneous, and centrally administered LMS

Behind closed doors, used mainly for

distribution

Page 4: PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Jari Laru 28.9.2012 University of Oulu.

Traditional approach (institutionalized environments)•Driven by the needs of the institution rather than

individual students•Represent a typical, application-centered

approach: pre-defined set of activities within closed and rather static systems (Arenas, 2008)

•Students have to act within the system under the constraints and limitation dictated by applications

Page 5: PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Jari Laru 28.9.2012 University of Oulu.

PLE

Page 6: PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Jari Laru 28.9.2012 University of Oulu.

Two approaches•Technology-centric approach: stress

importance of the development and implementationof social media (monolithic or combination of all different tools)

•Non technological approach: PLE as subjective, pedagogical approach: In this view PLE is a knowledge network or cognitive space that is in a constant state of flux

Page 7: PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Jari Laru 28.9.2012 University of Oulu.

Non technological approach

•This perspective does not focus on exact technologies….more attention is paid to how people and resources are connected throught technology

•PLE is entirely controlled and/or construcred by student and is adapted to according students needs and current activities

Page 8: PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Jari Laru 28.9.2012 University of Oulu.
Page 9: PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Jari Laru 28.9.2012 University of Oulu.

Examples•Example 1: RSS syndication / Edufeedr•Example 2: Google Hangouts / Google

Docs / Google +•Example 3: Edufeed course (multiple

social media tools)

Page 10: PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Jari Laru 28.9.2012 University of Oulu.

TASK•Design socio-technical instructional design

which includes appropriate tools for individual task(s) and collaborative task(s).

•Choose one individual activity and one collaborative activity and ”develop” personal learning environment (technological tools) that support this activity

•USE PLE tools to describe your PLE (instructional design and technological choices)

Page 11: PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Jari Laru 28.9.2012 University of Oulu.

Technological options1.RSS Syndication:Edufeedr: bind

multiple wordpress blogs (course blog, student blogs etc) bound together with RSS

2.Google (or MS) approach. Use google docs, google +, google hangouts to create appropriate PLE

3.Multiple Apps & tools (most complex approach)

Page 12: PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Jari Laru 28.9.2012 University of Oulu.