Top Banner
Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor Dave Sowders, Kansas City Plant Client
24

Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Dec 22, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling

Kaila Krieser, EE

Dan Montgomery, EE

Craig Christofferson, EE

Mark Wisted, EE

Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor

Dr. David Jiles, Advisor

Dave Sowders, Kansas City Plant Client

Page 2: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Problem Objective The team will select, use and assess an

electromagnetic modeling software tool to simulate Permanent Magnet Motor operation in variable magnet and environmental configurations.

Key Steps:1. Selection of Tool2. Selection of Model3. Modeling Execution4. Experimental Validation

Page 3: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Conceptual Sketch

Modeling Software Tool

Evaluation

Industry

Research

Design Motors

Magnet Material Experiments

Other Electromagnetic

Modeling Problems

Page 4: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

System Block DiagramResearch• PMM Function• PMM Modeling Fundamentals• Performance Characteristics• Magnetic Material Characteristics

Selection• Software • PMM CAD File

Simulation• FEMM• Opera-2D• ANSYS EM• MagNet

Software Evaluation• Accuracy (Stretch Goal: Physical Testing

• Cost• Usability• Magnet Materials• Performance Characteristics

Page 5: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Functional Requirements Modeling Tool for Permanent Magnet Motor

Various modeling tools will be evaluated for accuracy, available measurement parameters, usability and cost.

Motor Model Selection The selection of the motor model will be based on

complexity and obtainable matching CAD files Motor Simulation

Following the selection of the tool and the model, the simulation of the chosen motor will be executed with the software.

Stretch Goal: Motor Evaluation and Test Results In order to validate the modeling software’s efficiency,

torque, and power output data for a permanent magnet motor, the motor must be tested in a real-world situation.

Page 6: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Constraint Considerations Matching CAD File and Software Modeling Software Tool Training Cost Time Stretch Goal: Matching Motor and CAD File

Page 7: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Deliverables Software Evaluation Report

Software Overview Software Usability

Demonstration of CAD simulation Evaluation of PMM testing

Validation of simulation results

Page 8: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Technology Consideration Modeling Tool

Cost and Availability Usability and Training Resources Measurement Parameters Magnet Material Library Stretch Goal: Simulation Environmental Dependencies

PMM Model Cost and Availability Compatibility to Modeling Software Tool

Stretch Goal: Physical PMM Cost Size and Complexity Matching Motor and CAD File

Page 9: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Risks & Mitigation Change in Client’s Expectations Lack of Expertise

Page 10: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Cost EstimateItem Cost ($USD)

Modeling Software Tools

MagNet Infolytica 1800.00

ANSYS (Share Cost) 500.00

Vector Fields (30 Day Trial) 0.00

Foster Miller (Free Ware) 0.00

PMM

Used Appliance 200.00

New Motor 300.00

Magnet Variations

- NdFeB 25.00

- Samarium Cobalt 25.00

- Ceramic 25.00

- Alnico 25.00

Labor

Miss Kaila Ann Krieser 4500.00

Craig Christofferson 4500.00

Mark Wisted 4500.00

Daniel Montgomery 4500.00

Total Project Cost (software included) 20,900.00$

Total Project Cost (software excluded) 18,600.00$

Page 11: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Market Survey A comparative analysis from a prospective

engineering graduate is not readily available to the client, software companies, and research community.

The research and development style of this project produces intellectual deliverables. As such, similar projects are uncommon.

Page 12: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Research PMM Function

Components Rotor Stator Air gap

Brushless DC AC Motor Operation

Stator

Rotor

Permanent Magnets

Air Gap

Stator Windings

Page 13: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Research Modeling Fundamentals

Finite Element Analysis Polygonal Mesh Modeling 2D versus 3D Analysis Solvers

Static, Transient Time Harmonic

Page 14: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Research Performance Characteristics

Magnetomotive Force Reluctance Permeance Flux Linkage Cogging Torque Output Torque Efficiency and Loss

Electrical or Copper Losses Core Losses Mechanical Losses Stray Losses

Page 15: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Research Magnet Material Characteristics

Permeability Retentivity Hysteresis Maximum Energy Product Remanence or Residual Magnetizaion Coercivity Curie Temperature

Page 16: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Research Magnetic Materials

Ferromagnets Alnico Ceramic Samarium Cobalt Neodymium-Iron-Boron (NdFeB) Comparison of Materials

Page 17: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Modeling Software Tools Finite Element Method Magnetics (FEMM)

Simple, free software Cobham Opera-2D

Advanced, free 30 day trial ANSYS Electromagnetics Solutions

Advanced, department provided Infolytica MagNet

Dr. Jiles (Department Chair) recommended, Dr. Jiles provided

Page 18: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Evaluation Criteria Cost Usability Performance Characteristics Variability Magnetic Material Variability Environmental Variability Interpretation of Simulation Results Output Data Accuracy

Page 19: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Stretch Goal: Physical Testing Magnetomotive Force

Gaussmeter and Fluxmeter Flux Linkage

Back EMF Cogging Torque

Specific experimental apparatus Output Torque

Dynamometer Efficiency

Electrical power in versus mechanical power out

Page 20: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Current Project Status Modeling Software Tool Status FEMM Modeling Research Evaluation Motor Options Project Contacts

Dr. David Jiles Dr. Faris Al-naemi Dr. Mani Mina David M. Sowders Dr. William McCallum

Page 21: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Project Milestones & Schedule

Page 22: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Member Contributions Kaila Krieser

Weekly Reports Magnetic Material Research

Mark Wisted FEMM Modeling Software Research Website

Dan Montgomery Communicator Motor Research

Craig Christofferson Contacted Software Companies FEMM Modeling

Page 23: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Future Plan Remaining questions Narrow modeling software tool options for

client by middle of February Acquire evaluation motor by the beginning of

February with magnetic variation Stretch Goal: Start physical testing by March

Page 24: Permanent Magnet Motor Modeling Kaila Krieser, EE Dan Montgomery, EE Craig Christofferson, EE Mark Wisted, EE Dr. Mani Mina, Advisor Dr. David Jiles, Advisor.

Questions?