Page 1
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 1
http://www.tau.ac.il/chemistry/undergraduate/undergraduate-courses.html
http://www.tau.ac.il/video
Israel Schek ° �Ú ¥�±²¢�¢�� ¥³ ³¡¢ª±�¢©��
Tel Aviv University, Israel
General and Inorganic Chemistry:Atom Structure and the Periodic Table
: ʤ ʩʮ ʩʫ3 ̋ ʩʸ ʥʦʧ ʮʤ ʤʫʸʲ ʮʤʥ ʭ ʥʨʠʤ ʤʰʡʮ
Page 2
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 253
Periodicity – Mendeleev Table (a)
¾ Dmitri Ivanovich Mendeleev (1837-1907) in 1869 (along with the
German chemist Julius Lothar Mayer) came out with the idea:
The known elements may be arranged in a periodic rectangular chart
according to their atomic mass (not yet atomic number – an
unknown concept at their current time).
¾ This periodicity would reflect their chemical and physical properties.
¾ To us, who are “scientifically educated”, it looks obvious that
chemical and physical properties are of periodic nature.
¾ But one should appreciate the genius insight of the periodic
arrangement rather than in the “more natural” linear arrangement.
Page 3
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 254
¾ One of the first great successes of the periodicity was the prediction
of accurate characteristic properties of then (1871) concurrent
unknown elements, according to empty entries in the table.
¾ One hole was immediately below Silicon, and was temporarily
termed Eka-Silicon, later known as Germanium.
¾ The present order is according to the atomic number (nuclear
charge), not the atomic mass, as shown in 1913 by Henry Moseley
(1887-1915 Gallipoli, Dardanelles with other 55-65,000 Allied
Soldiers).
He measured wavelengths of the X-ray
spectral lines of a number of elements.
Periodicity – Mendeleev Table (b)
Page 4
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 255
Earlier Versions (a)
Page 5
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 256
¾ Dmitri Ivanovich Mendeleev
Centenary of Periodic Table,
Soviet Union 1969
showing his Notes
Earlier Versions (b)
Page 6
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 257
Periods – General Structure
Block structure of the electron orbitals
Page 7
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 258
Groups (Columns) at the Periodic Table
¾ The present table is of two-dimensional rectangular shape (with
obvious stairs and additional rows).
¾ Rows are called periods and columns are called groups.
¾ Elements belonging to a common group have in general similar
properties, which change gradually from one period to the next
one.
¾ The main reason is that they share common valence electronic
structure. The number of valent electrons defines the group
number.
Page 8
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 259
Groups (Columns) at the Periodic Table
¾ http://www.privatehand.com/flash/elements.html
Page 9
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 260
Alkaline Group¾ The elements of the first column are of the alkaline group, or
alkali metals or Group I (³ �¢¥°¥� ³�¤³§):
¾ Lithium, Sodium - ¨±³©, Potassium - ¨�¥²�, Rubidium, Cesium, Francium
¾ Electron configuration [inert gas]ns1
¾ These metals (high electron and thermal conductivities) are:
– Soft
– Low melting points
– Silver color
– All react drastically with water and replace the hydrogen. ³� ±¢��!
– Hardly found in their free state, but in compounds
– Metallic properties grow stronger down the column
Page 10
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 261
Alkaline Earth Group
¾ The elements of the second column are of the alkaline earth group, or alkali earth metals or Group II ( ³�¢¥°¥� ³�¤³§ ³�¢±� ±«):
¾ Beryllium, Magnesium, Calcium - ¨�¢ª, Strontium, Barium, Radium
¾ Electron configuration [inert gas]ns2
¾ These metals have quite similar properties to their left neighbors:
– But less aggressive
– Soft
– Low melting points
– Hardly found in their free state, but in compounds
– Metallic properties grow stronger down the column
Page 11
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 262
Group III
¾ Group III (no specific name) is at the 13th column (beyond the
large gap).
¾ Boron, Aluminum - ¨±§ , Gallium, Indium, Thallium
¾ Electron configuration [inert gas]ns2np1
¾ Apart from boron, which is semi-metal, other group elements are
metals.
Page 12
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 263
Group IV
¾ Group IV (no specific name) is at the 14th column (beyond the large gap) is):
¾ Carbon - ¨§ , Silicon - ¨±�¯, Germanium, Tin - ¥¢��, Lead –³±�«
¾ Electron configuration [inert gas]ns2np2
¾ Carbon is nonmetal and comprises Life
¾ Silicon (2nd most abundant element in the Earth mantle after oxygen), germanium - semimetals, and tin and lead are metals.
¾ Carbon, silicon, and germanium are usually in oxidation state +4, whereas tin and lead are +2.
Page 13
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 264
Group V
¾ Group V (no specific name) is at the 15th column (beyond the
large gap).
¾ Nitrogen - ¨°© , Phosphorus - ¨ ±�, Arsenic, Antimony, Bismuth
¾ Electron configuration [inert gas]ns2np3
¾ Nitrogen and phosphorus are nonmetals, arsenic and antimony
are semimetals, and bismuth is a metal.
¾ Oxides of the first three elements are acidic, that of bismuth is
basic and the oxides of antimony are in between, i.e. amphoteric.
¾ Nitrogen makes 80% of our atmosphere.
Page 14
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 265
Group VI
¾ Group VI (no specific name) is at the 16th column (beyond the
large gap).
¾ Oxygen - ¨¯§ , Sulfur - ³¢±��, Selenium, Tellurium, Polonium
¾ Electron configuration [inert gas]ns2np4
¾ Oxygen, sulfur, and selenium are nonmetals, tellurium is semi-
metal, and polonium is a metal (though not strong).
¾ Oxygen is the most abundant element on Earth, and the third most
abundant in Universe (after hydrogen and helium).
And, we breathe it.
Page 15
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 266
Halogens Group
¾ Halogens (“producers of salts”), Group VII are at the 17th column
(beyond the large gap).
¾ Fluorine, Chlorine, Bromine, Iodine, Astatine
¾ Electron configuration [inert gas]ns2np5
¾ React readily with most metals
Hence, found in Nature in compounds.
¾ Fluorine and chlorine are gases under regular conditions,
bromine is a liquid, and iodine is solid.
Page 16
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 267
Inert Gases Group
¾ Noble gases or inert gases are at the 18th column
(beyond the large gap):
¾ Helium, Neon, Argon, Krypton, Xenon, Radon
¾ Electron stable configuration [previous inert gas]ns2np6
¾ Since they are extremely inert (though not absolutely),they are found in Nature as monatomic gases.
¾ Argon (left over after nitrogen and oxygen are removed from dry air) was first discovered by spectroscopic analysis in 1894 by Lord Rayleigh (recall Blackbody Radiation) and William Ramsay (1852-1916). Both won Nobel Prize in 1904.
Lord Rayleigh
William Ramsay
Page 17
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 268
Periodic Table Groups (a)
¾ The “inertia” of inert gases suggested the explanation for chemical
bonding.
¾ As Gilbert Lewis (1875-1946) observed, atoms tend to arrange their
electronic constitutions in bonds, so as to reach an octet -
the stable octal inert gas configuration.
¾ William Ramsay (1852-1916) (left) and Physiologist Ivan Petrovich Pavlov (1849-1936)
60th Anniversary of Nobel Prize, Sweden 1964
Gilbert Lewis
Page 18
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 269
¾ This scope was later extended when quantum mechanical tools
were applied to chemical bonds and the octet was rationalized.
¾ Ideas like molecular orbitals (MO) were incorporated and the
region of the electron wave function was then extended to the
whole molecule, rather than the sole atom.
¾ Moreover, it was found that in some molecules the inert gas octet
rule is not kept – more than eight electrons are populated around
some atoms (e.g. in SF6, PCl5).
¾ Although inert, mostly the heavier ones are capable to take part in
chemical bonds, though not very stable (e.g. Ar-Ar, Xe-Xe and
clusters like Xen (n>3)).
Periodic Table Groups (b)
Page 19
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 270
Transition Metals
¾ The columns 3rd to 12th, between Group II and Group III are of
the transition metals.
¾ Their name is derived from their intermediate properties between
the active alkali and alkaline earth metals of the first two groups
and the mildly active metals of Group III and Group IV.
¾ First period of transition metals:
Scandium, Titanium, Vanadium, Chromium, Manganese,Ferum - ¥�±�, Cobalt, Nickel, Copper - ³²� ©, Zinc - ®��
¾ Electron configuration is of a partially filled d-orbital
[inert gas]ndk(n+1)s2
Page 20
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 271
Consequences of the Orbital Energies (a)
¾ As a result of the shielding effect the 4s-orbitals, which penetrate
deeper into the nuclear zone than do the 3d-orbitals, have lower
energy than the latter.
¾ Hence, potassium (K) and calcium (Ca) have their electrons
exterior to the argon configuration in 4s - K: [Ar]4s1 and
Ca: [Ar]4s2.
¾ The next 10 electrons occupy in their turn the 3d-orbital to form
the transition metals, starting with scandium Sc: [Ar]3d14s2 up to
zinc Zn: [Ar]3d104s2.
Page 21
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 272
¾ The energies of 4s- and 3d-orbitals are very close, and due to e-e
interaction, the system prefers energetically to have half-occupied
(d5) of the complete-occupied (d10) orbitals.
¾ Thus, an electron would be located in 3d-orbital rather than in the
4s-orbital.
For example, the configuration of chromium is Cr: [Ar]3d54s1
instead of [Ar]3d44s2, which is also acceptable, but a bit more
energetic.
¾ The copper configuration is Cu: [Ar]3d104s1 instead of [Ar]3d94s2,
where the 4s-orbital is only half filled.
Consequences of the Orbital Energies (b)
Page 22
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 273
¾ This energetic nearness of 4s and 3d makes the transition metals
have different valences.
¾ After filling up the 4p-orbital from gallium Ga: [Ar]3d104s24p1
to krypton Kr: [Ar]3d104s24p6, the first long period is complete.
¾ Then we have the fifth row (or fifth period) with its 18 elements.
¾ It starts with rubidium Rb: [Kr]5s1, through the transition metals
yttrium Y: [Kr]4d15s2 to cadmium Cd: [Kr]4d105s2, via indium
In: [Kr]4d105s25p1 up to xenon Xe: [Kr]4d105s25p6, which
completes the fifth row and is an inert element.
Consequences of the Orbital Energies (c)
Page 23
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 274
¾ Change of orbital
energies
of 4s and 3d between
Ca and Sc.
¾ Beyond Ca, 3d-orbital
energy falls abruptly.
Orbital Energies
Page 24
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 275
¾ The sixth row starts with cesium Cs: [Xe]6s1 and barium Br:
[Xe]6s2.
¾ Then starts the filling up of the orbital 5d with lanthanum La:
[Xe]5d16s2.
¾ Next to lanthanum starts filling up the next 14 elements in which the upper electrons are of the orbital 4f (Ɛ=3). They are called
lanthanides.
¾ They start with cerium Ce: [Xe]4f15d06s2, through europium Eu:
[Xe]4f75d06s2, to lutetium Lu: [Xe]4f145d16s2.
Consequences of the Orbital Energies (d)
Page 25
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 276
¾ Then going back to filling up the 10 transition metals with 5d
from hafnium Hf: [Xe]4f145d26s2, to mercury Hg: [Xe]4f145d106s2.
¾ Following are the main elements of 6p, starting with thallium Tl:
[Xe]4f145d106s26p1, and ending with the next inert element radon
Rn: [Xe]4f145d106s26p6, completing the sixth row.
¾ Following is the seventh row starting with francium Fr: [Rn]7s1
and radium Ra: [Rn]7s2.
¾ Then comes actinium with its 6d-electron Ac: [Rn]6d17s2.
¾ Then come the actinides with their 5f-electrons, starting with
thorium Th: [Rn]5f16d07s2, through americium Am: [Rn]5f76d07s2,
to lawrencium Lw: [Rn]5f146d17s2.
Consequences of the Orbital Energies (e)
Page 26
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 277
¾ Verification of the configurations may be executed by passing a
beam of atoms through an inhomogeneous magnetic field, as done
by Stern and Gerlach.
¾ Since a spin is a magnetic moment attached to the electron,
it feels the magnetic field and interacts with it.
¾ According to the amount of deviation of the atomic beam from the
initial direction, one can determine the overall spin state of the
system.
¾ One may naively claim that the total spin moment is a sum of the
individual electronic spin moments.
Consequences of the Orbital Energies (f)
Page 27
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 278
¾ For example, the [Ar]3d54s1 configuration of chromium has 6
unpaired spins (altogether 61/2=3 units of magnetic moment).
¾ The other, [Ar]3d44s2 configuration of chromium, has 4 unpaired
spins (altogether 41/2=2 units of magnetic moment.
¾ A beam of atoms in the first configuration would be deflected more
intensively than the second one, which is detected on the collecting
screen.
¾ A system with unpaired electron is a paramagnet and a system with
no unpaired electron is a diamagnetic.
Consequences of the Orbital Energies (g)
Page 28
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 279
Lanthanides
¾ There are two more families of metals:
The 14 lanthanides starting with Lanthanum, which are
characterized by partially filled 4f-orbitals: [inert gas]6s24fk
¾ The 14 actinides starting with actinium, which are characterized
by partially filled 5f-orbitals: [inert gas]7s25fk
¾ They are very similar in their properties and therefore hard to
separate.
¾ The actinides include the heavy radioactive elements among them
the trans- uranium (Z>92).
Page 29
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 280
Periodic Properties
Page 30
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 281
Periodic Properties - Atomic Radii (a)
¾ Periodicity of properties is pronounced mostly in sizes and
energies. Following are some typical examples.
¾ The notion of atomic radius of an element is not a sharp concept
due to the wave-like nature of the elementary particles.
¾ One may locate the major part of the existence of the "electronic
cloud" in a certain radius around the nucleus.
¾ There are orders of magnitudes, and definitely, the uranium atom
is larger than a hydrogen atom.
¾ The atomic radius is defined as half the distance between
neighboring equivalent atoms (e.g. in H2 molecule or Fe solid).
¾ They are obtained in spectroscopic or crystallographic
measurements.
Page 31
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 282
Atomic Radii in picometer (taken from Atkins & Jones)
Periodic Properties - Atomic Radii (b)
Page 32
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 283
¾ Atomic radii decrease with growing atomic number across the
row, due to growing of the effective nuclear charges.
¾ Radii are higher at alkaline metals, lower at the earth-alkaline,
then decrease more gradually towards the inert elements.
Periodic Properties - Atomic Radii (c)
Page 33
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 284
Periodic Variation of Atomic Radii in picometer (from Atkins & Jones)
Periodic Properties - Atomic Radii (d)
Page 34
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 285
Periodic Properties - Mendeleev
Dmitri Mendeleev Centenary of Periodic Table,
Soviet Union 1969
Page 35
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 286
Periodic Properties - Ionic Radii (a)
¾ As a basis to determination of the ionic contributions to inter-
nuclear distances one takes the radius of the oxygen ion O-2 as
0.14nm (=1.4Å).
¾ Cations are smaller than their parent elements due to loss of their
valent electrons, leaving behind much smaller cores.
¾ Anions on the other hand are larger than their parent atoms due to
gain of electrons.
Page 36
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 287
Ionic Radii in picometer (taken from Atkins & Jones)
Periodic Properties - Ionic Radii (b)
Page 37
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 288
Periodic Properties - Ionization Potential (a)
¾ Ionization potential is the minimum energy needed to remove an
electron from the ground state of the element
¾ ǻhionization is also called the ionization enthalpy (energy to be
invested at constant pressure of the gaseous atom).
¾ Since the electron is attracted to the rest of the atom, even if it is a
far electron in highly lying orbitals, energy always is invested to
remove an electron from the neutral atom.
ionizationǻH;e(g)EE(g) �� �o
Page 38
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 289
Ionization Potentials in kJoule/mole (taken from Atkins & Jones)
Periodic Properties - Ionization Potential (b)
Page 39
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 290
¾ The ionization potential increases across a row from the alkaline
metals low values towards the inert elements high values.
¾ Than it falls back abruptly down to the next low value at the next
alkaline element at the next row.
¾ When the peak values at the inert elements are connected there is
a smooth decrease in the line starting at the highest value of
Helium (2370. kJ/mole) towards that of Radon (1040. kJ/mole).
¾ It is much harder to ionize the helium atom rather than the larger
inert atoms.
Periodic Properties - Ionization Potential (c)
Page 40
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 291
¾ Atoms become smaller across a period (see the atomic radii
graph).
¾ Due to increasing effective charges electrons are more strongly
attracted to the nuclei when going from the alkaline element
toward the inert element in a period.
¾ Going down a group the outermost electrons are farther away
from the nuclei and therefore less attracted and less bound.
Periodic Properties - Ionization Potential (d)
Page 41
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 292
¾ Since on the average outermost d-orbitals are deeper in location
than their preceding s-orbitals, moving from one element to the
next one across a transition elements group does not show a steep
change in relative values.
¾ This point is more emphasized across the lanthanides and
actinides, where there is hardly a change in the ionization potential
inside the group.
Periodic Properties - Ionization Potential (e)
Page 42
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 293
Periodic Variation of Ionization Potentials (from Atkins & Jones)
Periodic Properties - Ionization Potential (f)
Page 43
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 294
Periodic Properties - Electron Affinity (a)
¾ Electron affinity (meaning attraction towards electrons) is the
energy released when an electron is added to an atom or ion
¾ ǻHgain is positively defined when there is a gain of energy when
the extra electron joins the neutral atom, and negatively when
energy must be invested to force an electron into the neutral atom.
¾ Contrary to ionization potential, the process of gaining an electron
may be exothermic as well as endothermic.
gainǻH(g);EeE(g) �� o�
Page 44
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 295
¾ The upper right corner is electron-philic (love of electrons).
¾ It is mostly pronounced for the fluorine, and other halogens, but also the VI group of oxygen and sulfur. The electron is welcomed.
¾ Inert elements do not "feel" affinity towards an extra electron,mostly neon.
¾ Nitrogen and some earth-alkaline dislike the idea to be negative.
Periodic Properties - Electron Affinity (b)
Page 45
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 296
Electron Affinity in kJoule/mole (taken from Atkins & Jones)
Periodic Properties - Electron Affinity (c)
Page 46
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 297
¾ Electronegativity is the extent of the element attraction towards
the electron.
¾ Linus Carl Pauling (1901-1994) and Robert Sanderson Mulliken
(1896-1986) defined a numerical measure for electronegativity.
¾ Pauling: 1954 Nobel Prize laureate for his studies on the nature of
the chemical bond and molecular structure of proteins.
¾ Mulliken: 1966 Nobel Prize laureate for his studies on chemical
bonds and the electron structure of molecules by means of the
orbital method.
Periodic Properties - Electronegativity (a)
Page 47
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 298
¾ The electronegativity considers the resistance to lose an electron
(expressed by the ionization potential) as well as the agreement to
have an extra one (expressed by the electron affinity).
¾ The simplest expression (due to Mulliken (1934) is the average of
both values
EA)/2(IPȤ �
Periodic Properties - Electronegativity (b)
Page 48
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 299
¾ Very electronegative elements (halogens, small VI group-atoms)
at the upper right corner zone.
¾ Electropositive elements (heavy alkaline, heavy earth-alkaline)
at the lower left corner (“they dislike electrons”).
Atkins & Jones
Periodic Properties - Electronegativity (c)
Page 49
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 300
¾ The scale runs as
¾ The electronegativity would serve defining the polarity of a
chemical bond.
¾ The electric dipole moment of a simple diatomic molecule AB is
approximately linearly related to the electronegativity difference.
¾ The larger this difference, the more polar the bond is.
4ȤȤ0.79Ȥ FCe dd
BA ȤȤȝ �|
Periodic Properties - Electronegativity (d)
Page 50
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 301
The periodicity of the Pauling electronegativity
Linus Carl Pauling,
Upper Volta 1977
Periodic Properties - Electronegativity (e)
Page 51
Israel Schek ʬʠʸʹʩ ʷʹ 302
Finally, in 3-Dim representation:
Periodic Properties - Electronegativity (f)