Top Banner
28

 · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later

Apr 10, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 2:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 3:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 4:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 5:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 6:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 7:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 8:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 9:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 10:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 11:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 12:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 13:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 14:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 15:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 16:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 17:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 18:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 19:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 20:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 21:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 22:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 23:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 24:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 25:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 26:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 27:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later
Page 28:  · Period. The deposit found in 2006 in Tell el-Farkha cannot be later than Dynasty O and I, as suggested by pottery datings for the abandonment of this part of the site no later