Top Banner
www.jordilabs.com Page 1 Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand PROBLEM A personal care products formulation lab was trying to understand how their version of a popular designer perfume compared to the “real thing”. Sensory tests demonstrated that the scent of their version faded more quickly, and that their product dried the skin. Jordi’s role was to determine the source of the unfavorable effects to aid them in improving their formula. ANALYTICAL STRATEGY After an initial consultation call to understand the customer’s ultimate goals for the investigative analysis, Jordi Labs prepared a thorough technical proposal detailing a tailored series of recommended analytical techniques and their applicability to solving the customer’s problem. The final analytical approach agreed to by both parties is outlined below. GC-FID was used to screen for the relative quantity of alcohol between the two products and to screen for other potential volatiles. A greater alcohol concentration can affect drying of the skin. DMS was used to compare the chemistry of the oils and fragrance package in the two materials. This technique is not strictly quantitative, but an estimation of relative quantities between the products was achieved by comparing peak areas. TGA was used to compare the percentage residuals, relating to inorganic sample components. CONCLUSIONS We found that the customer’s product had a notably higher alcohol content and different fragrance package as compared to the competitive product. Read the following report to see the full analysis.
104

Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

Aug 05, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

www.jordilabs.com  Page 1 

Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand

CASE STUDY

Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand

PROBLEM

A personal care products formulation lab was trying to understand how their version of a popular designer

perfume compared to the “real thing”. Sensory tests demonstrated that the scent of their version faded more

quickly, and that their product dried the skin. Jordi’s role was to determine the source of the unfavorable effects

to aid them in improving their formula.

ANALYTICAL STRATEGY

After an initial consultation call to understand the customer’s ultimate goals for the investigative analysis, Jordi

Labs prepared a thorough technical proposal detailing a tailored series of recommended analytical techniques

and their applicability to solving the customer’s problem. The final analytical approach agreed to by both

parties is outlined below.

GC-FID was used to screen for the relative quantity of alcohol between the two products and to screen for other

potential volatiles. A greater alcohol concentration can affect drying of the skin.

DMS was used to compare the chemistry of the oils and fragrance package in the two materials. This technique

is not strictly quantitative, but an estimation of relative quantities between the products was achieved by

comparing peak areas.

TGA was used to compare the percentage residuals, relating to inorganic sample components.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the customer’s product had a notably higher alcohol content and different fragrance package as

compared to the competitive product.

Read the following report to see the full analysis.

Page 2: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

S P E C I A L I S T S I N L I Q U I D C H R O M A T O G R A P H Y4 M i l l S t , B e l l i n g h a m , M A . 0 2 0 1 9 U S A

Tel: +1 (508) 966-1301 Fax: +1 (508) 966-4063

W E B : w w w . j o r d i f l p . c o m | E M : i n f o @ j o r d i f l p . c o m

WEB: WEB: www.j ordilabs.com EMAIL: EMAIL: info@j ordilabs.com

Final Report

Jordi Labs Perfume Analysis

Date: 06/30/10

Prepared by:

Dr. Mark Jordi

President

Jordi Labs LLC

Report Number: J4916

Jordi Labs Confi dential

MATERIAL SOLUTIONS. UNCOMPROMISING INTEGRITY.Page 1 of 103

Page 3: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

June 30, 2010

Your Name Here P: xxx-xxx-xxx

Your Company Name Here E: [email protected]

Dear Client,

Please find enclosed the test results for your sample described as:

1. Designer – Original Designer Product

2. Imitation – Imitation Product

The following tests were performed:

1. Desorption Mass Spectroscopy (DMS)

2. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

3. Gas Chromatography - Flame Ionization Detector (GC-FID)

Objective

The objective of this work is to compare a designer and an imitation perfume. Special

attention is paid to sources of fragrance longevity and materials which may cause drying of

the skin.

Summary of Results

The perfumes were found to contain similar components by DMS. The Designer sample was

found to contain some additional fragrance components and a UV-B absorber. The Imitation

sample was found to contain isopropyl myristate, which is reported to be an emollient. GC-

FID and TGA were able to show the composition differences in the samples. The Designer

sample was found to contain larger fragrance content, and correspondingly a lower amount of

ethanol.

Page 2 of 103

Page 4: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

Individual Test Results

A summary of the individual test results is provided below. All accompanying data,

including spectra, has been included in the data section of this report.

DMS: – The fragrance mixture and other volatile sample components were investigated by

DMS. The samples were analyzed using an injection port temperature of 310ºC.

Identifications are based on comparison with the NIST spectral library of over 147,350

compounds. Match quality is based on a 1000 scale with a perfect match indicted by a score

of 1000. Table I contains a list of the components that were detected in each sample.

Table I

DMS Results

Component Designer ImitationRetention Time

(minutes)

Apparent

Purpose

Ethanol X  X  3.2 Solvent

Propylene glycol   X  4.3 Carrier

Pinene X  X  5.6 (α), 6.0 (β) Fragrance

Myrcene X    6.1 Fragrance

Limonene X  X  6.6 Fragrance

3,7-dimethyl-1,6-Octadien-3-

ol (Linalool) X  X  7.3 Fragrance

Laevo-camphor X    7.8 Fragrance

Benzyl Acetate X  X  7.9 Fragrance

Estragole X    8.4 Fragrance

Turpineol   X  8.2 Fragrance

Benzene propanol   X  8.6 Fragrance

Citronellol X  X  8.7 Fragrance

3,7-dimethyl-2-

aminobenzoate-1,6-octadien-

3-ol

X  X  8.9 Fragrance

(E)-citral X    9.1 Fragrance

2,6-dimethyl-2,6-octadiene X  X  9.8 Fragrance

Neryl Acetate X  X  9.9 Fragrance

Geranyl Acetate X  X  10.1 Fragrance

Vanillin X  X  10.8 Fragrance

Coumarin X  X  11.0 Fragrance

Diethyl phthalate X  X  12.3

Cedrol   X  12.3 Fragrance

Methyl dihydrojasmonate X  X  12.9 Fragrance

Cubenol   X  12.6 Fragrance

Nuciferol X    13.4 Fragrance

Benzyl Benzoate   X  13.5 Stabilizer

Page 3 of 103

Page 5: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

Component Designer ImitationRetention Time

(minutes)

Apparent

Purpose

Cedryl acetate X  X  13.8 Fragrance

Isopropyl Myristate   X  13.8 Emollient

6,7-diethyl-1,2,3,4-

tetrahydro-1,1,4,4-

tetramethyl-naphthalene

X    14.0 Fragrance

Versalide X  X  14.4 Fragrance

Isophytol X    14.8 Fragrance

Musk ketone X  X  15.3 Fragrance

Ethylene brassylate X  X  15.5 Fragrance

Octyl methoxycinnamate X    17.3 UV-B

absorber

Cinnamyl cinnamate X    17.9 Fragrance * X indicates that a particular compound was detected in the sample.

TGA

The sample was subjected to TGA analysis over the temperature range from ambient to

1000ºC. The samples were analyzed under nitrogen. Analysis results are shown in Table II.

The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight

loss is most likely due to loss of the ethanol solvent which accounted for approximately 85%

of the total sample. The remaining two losses can be attributed to evaporation and thermal

degradation of the fragrance components.

The thermogram for the Imitation sample only exhibited two recognizable weight losses.

Again the first can be attributed to the loss of ethanol, and the second to the loss of fragrance

components. The major difference between the two samples is the relative amount of loss

observed in each portion. The Imitation sample lost 94% at low temperature as compared to

84% for the Designer sample. This observation agrees with data from GC-FID, confirming

that the Imitation sample contains more ethanol and less of the fragrance components. The

Imitation sample was also observed to contain slightly more (~0.3%) residual inorganic

material.

Table II

TGA Weight Loss

Sample Weight Loss

Step

Weight Loss

%

Total % Weight

Loss % Residual

Designer

1 84.97

99.49 0.51 2 10.40

3 4.123

Imitation 1 93.82

99.15 0.85 2 5.333

Page 4 of 103

Page 6: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

Figure I – Overlay of TGA thermograms.

GC-FID

GC-FID was used to screen the samples for the relative quantity of the solvent and other

volatile materials. The Imitation sample was observed to contain a larger amount of ethanol

than was observed for the Designer sample. This conclusion is based on the observed peak

area of the peak at 2.5 minutes retention time. Figure II contains an overlay of the GC-FID

chromatograms in this region.

Page 5 of 103

azouiri
Text Box
Designer - Red Imitation - Blue
azouiri
Text Box
Page 7: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

Figure II – Overlay of GC-FID chromatograms in the solvent region.

Additional components, including the fragrances detected, were observed between 6 and 20

minutes retention time. All components observed in the Imitation sample appear at lower

concentration than those observed in the Designer sample. Figure III contains an overlay of

sample chromatograms in this region.

Figure III – Overlay of GC-FID chromatograms in the fragrance region.

Page 6 of 103

azouiri
Text Box
Designer - Red Imitation - Blue
azouiri
Text Box
Designer - Red Imitation - Blue
Page 8: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

Analysis Conditions

DMS

The samples were analyzed using a Hewlet 5890 gas chromatograph in conjunction with a

5972 mass selective detector and a thermal desorption attachment. Data acquisition was

accomplished using chemstation software. Sample peaks were compared with over 147,350

reference compounds using the NIST/EPA/NIH mass spectral search program.

A blank run was used immediately before analysis of the samples to ensure the absence of

contaminants. The sample was analyzed in duplicate to confirm the repeatability of the

results.

Sample Size = 0.1µL

Initial Delay = 2.0 minutes

Initial Temperature: 50ºC

Final Temperature: 320ºC

Temperature Ramp Rate 1: 15ºC per minute

Injector Port Temperature: 310ºC

Detector Temperature: 310ºC

Injector Split = NA

Mass Range: Low Mass = 29, High Mass = 550

TGA

Analysis of samples was accomplished using a TA 500 Thermogravimetric Analyzer in

combination with TA Universal Analysis software. Approximately 30mg of the sample was

weighed into a platinum weigh boat for each analysis. Samples were run under a nitrogen

atmosphere and heated from ambient to 1000°C at a rate of 20°C per minute.

GC-FID

The samples were analyzed directly using an HP 5890a gas chromatograph in conjunction

with a flame ionization detector. Data acquisition was accomplished using chemstation

software. A blank run was used immediately before analysis of the samples to insure the

absence of contaminants.

The following run conditions were applied for Gas Chromatographic analysis:

Injection Size = 1uL

Initial Temperature: 50ºC

Final Temperature: 320ºC

Temperature Ramp Rate 1: 15ºC per minute

Injector Port Temperature: 310ºC

Detector Temperature: 320ºC

Page 7 of 103

Page 9: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

Injector Split = NA

Column = RTX-5MS 30m x .25mm

Closing Comments

Deformulation of an unknown material is intended to provide a best estimate of the chemical

nature of the sample. All chemical structures are supported by the evidence presented but are

subject to revision upon receipt of additional evidence. Additional factors such as material

processing conditions may also affect final material properties.

Jordi Labs’ reports are issued solely for the use of the clients to whom they are addressed. No

quotations from reports or use of the Jordi name is permitted except as authorized in writing.

The liability of Jordi Labs with respect to the services rendered shall be limited to the amount

of consideration paid for such services and do not include any consequential damages.

Jordi Labs specializes in polymer testing and has 25 years experience doing complete

polymer deformulations. We are one of the few labs in the country specialized in this type of

testing. We will work closely with you to help explain your test results and solve your

problem. We appreciate your business and are looking forward to speaking with you

concerning these results.

Sincerely,

Mark Jordi

Mark Jordi, Ph. D.

President

Jordi Labs LLC

Page 8 of 103

Page 10: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

Appendix

Table of Contents

• Pages 10-95 – DMS Data

• Page 96-100 – TGA Data

• Page 101-103 – GC-FID Data

Page 9 of 103

Page 11: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

DMS RESULTS  Designer

Page 10 of 103

Page 12: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

File : C:\HPCHEM\1\DATA\2010\JOB2010\EXPDEF\Designer.DOperator : KRAcquired : 5 Jun 2010 21:35 using AcqMethod DESORP2 Instrument : DMS InstrSample Name: Designer .1ul Misc Info : desorp2 inj 310 ramp 50-320 15C/min Vial Number: 100

2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 30.00 32.00 34.00

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

1600000

1800000

2000000

2200000

2400000

2600000

2800000

3000000

3200000

3400000

3600000

3800000

4000000

4200000

4400000

Time-->

Abundance TIC: Designer3.D 3.46

5.59

6.03

6.11

6.60

6.73

6.88

7.37

7.84

8.00 8.37

8.76

8.99

9.10

9.84

9.95

10.16

10.30

10.49

10.63

10.82

11.08

11.46

12.34

12.86

13.03

13.26

13.36

13.58

13.75

13.92

13.99

14.36

14.41 14.79 15.32

15.54

16.44

17.30

17.89 21.82

24.07

Page 11 of 103

Page 13: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 300 (3.464 min): Designer.DCompound in Library Factor = 475

20 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 50 53 56 590

50

100

29

31

33 40414243

45

46

47

Hit 1 : Ethyl alcoholC2H6O; MF: 921; RMF: 921; Prob 94.3%; CAS: 64-17-5; Lib: replib; ID: 551.

20 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 50 53 56 590

50

100

22 242526

27

28

29

30

31

3233 3940414243

44

45

46

47

OH

Hit 2 : Ethyl alcoholC2H6O; MF: 912; RMF: 913; Prob 94.3%; CAS: 64-17-5; Lib: mainlib; ID: 1334.

20 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 50 53 56 590

50

100

242526

27

28

29

30

31

33 4142

43

44

45

46

47

OH

Page 12 of 103

Page 14: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 486 (5.588 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -110

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

29

41

53 67

77

87

93

105 121136

207

Hit 1 : 1R-.alpha.-PineneC10H16; MF: 947; RMF: 952; Prob 17.0%; CAS: 7785-70-8; Lib: replib; ID: 12053.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

41

5367

77

93

105 121 136

Hit 2 : .alpha.-PineneC10H16; MF: 946; RMF: 953; Prob 16.3%; CAS: 80-56-8; Lib: mainlib; ID: 51652.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

2741

53

5867

77

93

105121

136

Page 13 of 103

Page 15: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 525 (6.033 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -100

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500

50

100

29

39

41

4353

57

67

69

74

77

89

91

93

99107

121136

Hit 1 : .beta.-PineneC10H16; MF: 941; RMF: 941; Prob 31.9%; CAS: 127-91-3; Lib: replib; ID: 11947.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500

50

100

27

29

39

41

4353 67

69

7991

93

107121 136

Hit 2 : Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane, 6,6-dimethyl-2-methylene-, (1S)-C10H16; MF: 939; RMF: 944; Prob 29.4%; CAS: 18172-67-3; Lib: replib; ID: 11958.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500

50

100

27

39

41

4353

57

67

6979

89

91

93

107121

136

Page 14 of 103

Page 16: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 532 (6.113 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 125

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500

50

100

29

39

41

4353 67

69

79

85

91

93

100 107 121 136

Hit 1 : .beta.-MyrceneC10H16; MF: 913; RMF: 915; Prob 53.6%; CAS: 123-35-3; Lib: mainlib; ID: 3407.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500

50

100

27

29

39

41

43

53 67

69

74

7991

93

107 121 136

Hit 2 : .beta.-MyrceneC10H16; MF: 897; RMF: 899; Prob 53.6%; CAS: 123-35-3; Lib: replib; ID: 1200.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500

50

100

2739

41

43

53

65

67

69

79

89

91

93

107 121136

Page 15 of 103

Page 17: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 575 (6.604 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -103

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600

50

100

29

37

39

51

53

55 65

68

74

77

79

89

93

107 121136

154

Hit 1 : LimoneneC10H16; MF: 935; RMF: 936; Prob 21.9%; CAS: 138-86-3; Lib: replib; ID: 7399.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600

50

100

27

29

32

39

41

51

53

55

58

65

68

77

79

89

93

107 121 136

Hit 2 : D-LimoneneC10H16; MF: 931; RMF: 931; Prob 18.5%; CAS: 5989-27-5; Lib: replib; ID: 7415.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600

50

100

27

32

41

43 51

53

55 65

68

74

77

79

81

89

93

107 121136

Page 16 of 103

Page 18: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 586 (6.730 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -371

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29

32

41

55

67

83

93

100

107 121 136 156 207 253

Hit 1 : 2-Butenoic acid, 3-methyl-, 2-methylpropyl esterC9H16O2; MF: 818; RMF: 858; Prob 21.2%; CAS: 30434-54-9; Lib: mainlib; ID: 40872.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29 39 55

67

83

100

113 156

O

O

Hit 2 : 3-Methyl-2-butenoic acid, heptyl esterC12H22O2; MF: 815; RMF: 846; Prob 18.7%; Lib: mainlib; ID: 41622.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

2941

55

69

83

100

113 198

O

O

Page 17 of 103

Page 19: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 599 (6.878 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 165

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500

50

100

29

39 43

51 55 65

74

77

79

8389

91

93

105

121

125

136

Hit 1 : 1,4-Cyclohexadiene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-C10H16; MF: 947; RMF: 956; Prob 28.7%; CAS: 99-85-4; Lib: replib; ID: 12042.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500

50

100

2739 43

5155

65

77

79

89

91

93

105

121 136

Hit 2 : 1,4-Cyclohexadiene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-C10H16; MF: 946; RMF: 962; Prob 28.7%; CAS: 99-85-4; Lib: replib; ID: 12040.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500

50

100

27

29

39 43

5155

65

77

79

89

91

93

105

121 136

Page 18 of 103

Page 20: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 642 (7.369 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 178

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600

50

100

29

31

39

43

51

53

55

67

69

71

80

83

86

93

96 107

121

125136

154

Hit 1 : 1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-C10H18O; MF: 918; RMF: 918; Prob 74.5%; CAS: 78-70-6; Lib: mainlib; ID: 30690.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600

50

100

27

31

39

41

45 51

53

55

59 65

67

69

71

80

83

93

96 107

121

127136

154

OH

Hit 2 : 1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-C10H18O; MF: 915; RMF: 919; Prob 74.5%; CAS: 78-70-6; Lib: replib; ID: 8161.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600

50

100

27

31

39

41

45 51

53

55

59 65

67

69

71

80

83

93

96 107

121

127136

OH

Page 19 of 103

Page 21: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 683 (7.837 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 141

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29

32

41

55 69

81

95

108

119 137

152

207 253

Hit 1 : Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-one, 1,7,7-trimethyl-, (1S)-C10H16O; MF: 942; RMF: 967; Prob 43.8%; CAS: 464-48-2; Lib: mainlib; ID: 53149.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

27

41

55 69

81

95

108

123 137

152

O

Hit 2 : CamphorC10H16O; MF: 928; RMF: 936; Prob 27.4%; CAS: 76-22-2; Lib: replib; ID: 12335.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

27

41

5569

81

95

108

121 137

152

O

Page 20 of 103

Page 22: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 697 (7.997 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 336

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600

50

100

29

39

43

51

63

65

69 74

79

85

91

95

108

121 138

150

Hit 1 : Acetic acid, phenylmethyl esterC9H10O2; MF: 944; RMF: 949; Prob 89.2%; CAS: 140-11-4; Lib: replib; ID: 14560.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600

50

100

27 31

39

43

51

63

65

74

79

86

91

108

150

O

O

Hit 2 : Acetic acid, phenylmethyl esterC9H10O2; MF: 933; RMF: 938; Prob 89.2%; CAS: 140-11-4; Lib: mainlib; ID: 64787.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600

50

100

27 31

39

41

43

45

51

63

65

74

77

79

86

91

108

150

O

O

Page 21 of 103

Page 23: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 730 (8.374 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 342

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29

39 51

5563

74

77

91105

121

133

148

253

Hit 1 : EstragoleC10H12O; MF: 960; RMF: 962; Prob 75.2%; CAS: 140-67-0; Lib: replib; ID: 19656.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

2739

5163

74

7791 105

121

133

148

O

Hit 2 : EstragoleC10H12O; MF: 959; RMF: 972; Prob 75.2%; CAS: 140-67-0; Lib: mainlib; ID: 94865.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

2739

51

55

63

77

91 105

121

133

148

O

Page 22 of 103

Page 24: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 764 (8.762 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -107

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

31

41

55

69

81

95

109 123

129138 156 253

Hit 1 : 6-Octen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-C10H20O; MF: 922; RMF: 924; Prob 31.9%; CAS: 106-22-9; Lib: mainlib; ID: 3042.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

27

41

55

69

82

95

109 123138 156

HO

Hit 2 : 6-Octen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, (R)-C10H20O; MF: 918; RMF: 921; Prob 26.9%; CAS: 1117-61-9; Lib: mainlib; ID: 28138.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

27

41

55

69

8195

109123

138156

OH

Page 23 of 103

Page 25: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 784 (8.991 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 170

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600

50

100

29

31

39

41

43

51

53

5567

69

80

83

93

107

121

127136

154

Hit 1 : 1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, 2-aminobenzoateC17H23NO2; MF: 962; RMF: 966; Prob 76.1%; CAS: 7149-26-0; Lib: mainlib; ID: 51289.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600

50

100

27

31

39

41

43

51

53

5567

69

71

77

80

83

91

93

105113

121

136154

NH2

O

O

Hit 2 : 1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetateC12H20O2; MF: 912; RMF: 912; Prob 15.5%; CAS: 115-95-7; Lib: mainlib; ID: 51290.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600

50

100

27

31

39

43

45

55

60 65

69

71

80

8389

93

107113

121

127

136

154

O

O

Page 24 of 103

Page 26: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 794 (9.105 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 112

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

29

41

53

69

84

94 109123 137 152 207 253 331

Hit 1 : 2,6-Octadienal, 3,7-dimethyl-, (E)-C10H16O; MF: 885; RMF: 889; Prob 39.1%; CAS: 141-27-5; Lib: mainlib; ID: 2980.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

27

41

53

69

84

94109 123 137

152

O

Hit 2 : 2,6-Octadienal, 3,7-dimethyl-, (Z)-C10H16O; MF: 873; RMF: 878; Prob 26.0%; CAS: 106-26-3; Lib: mainlib; ID: 2942.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

27

41

53

69

8494

109123 137 152

O

Page 25 of 103

Page 27: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 858 (9.836 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -388

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

29

43

55

69

81

95

109

119

138 151

161 178 191 204 253 331

Hit 1 : 2,6-Octadiene, 2,6-dimethyl-C10H18; MF: 801; RMF: 822; Prob 14.3%; CAS: 2792-39-4; Lib: replib; ID: 2290.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

10043

55

61

69 81

95

109

123

138

Hit 2 : 6-Octen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetateC12H22O2; MF: 799; RMF: 882; Prob 13.2%; CAS: 150-84-5; Lib: replib; ID: 7605.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

27

43

55

61

69

8195

109

123

138

155 199

OO

Page 26 of 103

Page 28: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 868 (9.950 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 103

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

29

41

53

69

80

93

107121

136154 175 189 204 253 331

Hit 1 : 2,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetate, (Z)-C12H20O2; MF: 916; RMF: 944; Prob 44.9%; CAS: 141-12-8; Lib: replib; ID: 7487.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

27

41

53

69

80

93

107121 136

154

OO

Hit 2 : 2,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetate, (Z)-C12H20O2; MF: 898; RMF: 906; Prob 44.9%; CAS: 141-12-8; Lib: mainlib; ID: 28008.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

27

41

53

69

80

93

107

121 136

154 196

OO

Page 27 of 103

Page 29: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 886 (10.155 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 168

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 2100

50

100

29

43

53

69

8085

93

107121

127136

147154161 189 204

Hit 1 : 2,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetateC12H20O2; MF: 957; RMF: 966; Prob 47.4%; CAS: 16409-44-2; Lib: replib; ID: 7488.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 2100

50

100 41

53

69

8085

93

107

121

127

136

154

O

O

Hit 2 : 2,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetate, (E)-C12H20O2; MF: 947; RMF: 950; Prob 33.5%; CAS: 105-87-3; Lib: replib; ID: 7492.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 2100

50

100

27

41

53

69

8085

93

107

121

127

136

154 196

OO

Page 28 of 103

Page 30: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 899 (10.304 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -185

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

29

41

5567

81

91

105

119 133147 161

175

189

204

253 331

Hit 1 : 2-Isopropenyl-4a,8-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,7-octahydronaphthaleneC15H24; MF: 881; RMF: 888; Prob 16.0%; Lib: mainlib; ID: 118910.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

29

41

5567

81

91 105

123

133

147 161

175

189

204

Hit 2 : 1H-Cycloprop[e]azulene, 1a,2,3,4,4a,5,6,7b-octahydro-1,1,4,7-tetramethyl-, [1aR-(1a.alpha.,4.alpha.,4a.beta.,7C15H24; MF: 862; RMF: 865; Prob 7.74%; CAS: 489-40-7; Lib: mainlib; ID: 125451.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

29

41

55

67

81

91

105

119

133

147

161

175

189

204

Page 29 of 103

Page 31: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 915 (10.486 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -733

20 50 80 110 140 170 200 230 260 290 320 350 380 4100

50

100

2941 53

65

81

91

105

133

151

161

189

204

253 327 405

Hit 1 : 1H-Benzocyclohepten-7-ol, 2,3,4,4a,5,6,7,8-octahydro-1,1,4a,7-tetramethyl-, cis-C15H26O; MF: 742; RMF: 745; Prob 20.8%; CAS: 6892-80-4; Lib: replib; ID: 19977.

20 50 80 110 140 170 200 230 260 290 320 350 380 4100

50

100

29

41

55

69

81

95

107

119

133

151

161

175

189204

222

OH

Hit 2 : 2-Isopropenyl-4a,8-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,7-octahydronaphthaleneC15H24; MF: 728; RMF: 853; Prob 13.0%; Lib: mainlib; ID: 118910.

20 50 80 110 140 170 200 230 260 290 320 350 380 4100

50

100

29

41

5567

81

91 105

123

133

147

175

189

204

Page 30 of 103

Page 32: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 928 (10.635 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -804

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29

32

4153

6977

8193

105

119

136

151

161

175 189

204

253

Hit 1 : 1H-3a,7-Methanoazulene, 2,3,4,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,6,8,8-tetramethyl-, [3R-(3.alpha.,3a.beta.,7.beta.,8a.alpha.C15H24; MF: 743; RMF: 887; Prob 13.3%; CAS: 469-61-4; Lib: replib; ID: 15877.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29

41

55

69

77

93

105

119

136 147

161

175 189

204

Hit 2 : Di-epi-.alpha.-cedreneC15H24; MF: 740; RMF: 859; Prob 11.8%; Lib: mainlib; ID: 72092.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29

41

5569

77

93

105

119

133 147

161

175189

204

H

Page 31 of 103

Page 33: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 944 (10.818 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -181

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 2100

50

100

29 4353

65 77

81

91

109

115

123

133

151

161 176 189 204

Hit 1 : VanillinC8H8O3; MF: 855; RMF: 905; Prob 37.2%; CAS: 121-33-5; Lib: mainlib; ID: 98716.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 2100

50

100

27 3951

65

81

95

109123

137

152

O

O

HO

Hit 2 : Benzaldehyde, 3-hydroxy-4-methoxy-C8H8O3; MF: 854; RMF: 912; Prob 35.8%; CAS: 621-59-0; Lib: replib; ID: 20012.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 2100

50

100

2939

53

65

81

93

109123

137

151

O

HO

O

Page 32 of 103

Page 34: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 967 (11.080 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 143

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

29

3945

51

63

75 86

90

103

118

135

146

151 161 175 185 204

Hit 1 : 2H-1-Benzopyran-2-oneC9H6O2; MF: 868; RMF: 908; Prob 77.2%; CAS: 91-64-5; Lib: replib; ID: 15749.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

2639

4551

63

74 86

90

98

118

146

O O

Hit 2 : 2H-1-Benzopyran-2-oneC9H6O2; MF: 862; RMF: 913; Prob 77.2%; CAS: 91-64-5; Lib: replib; ID: 15748.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

2631

3945

51

63

74 86

90

98

118

146

O O

Page 33 of 103

Page 35: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1000 (11.457 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -328

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

29

4155

67

79

91

107

121

135

147

163

173

191

206

220 253 281 327

Hit 1 : 2-Butenal, 2-methyl-4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-C14H22O; MF: 834; RMF: 838; Prob 22.1%; CAS: 3155-71-3; Lib: mainlib; ID: 64185.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

29

41

55

69

8195

107123

135

149

163

173

191

206

O

H

Hit 2 : 4-(2,2-Dimethyl-6-methylenecyclohexylidene)-3-methylbutan-2-oneC14H22O; MF: 829; RMF: 834; Prob 17.8%; CAS: 93175-74-7; Lib: mainlib; ID: 104424.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

29

43

55

69

79

93

107

121

133149

163

173

191

206

O

Page 34 of 103

Page 36: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1077 (12.336 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 513

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 2300

50

100

29

3950

65 76 93 105121

132

149

164

177

194 222

Hit 1 : Diethyl PhthalateC12H14O4; MF: 961; RMF: 974; Prob 90.7%; CAS: 84-66-2; Lib: replib; ID: 19810.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 2300

50

100

29 3950

65 7693 105 121

132

149

177

222

O

O

O

O

Hit 2 : Diethyl PhthalateC12H14O4; MF: 947; RMF: 948; Prob 90.7%; CAS: 84-66-2; Lib: replib; ID: 19812.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 2300

50

100

29

39 5057

65 76 93 105 121132

149

163

177

194 222

O

O

O

O

Page 35 of 103

Page 37: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1123 (12.861 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -137

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 2400

50

100

29

41 55

59 6774

83

91109

123 137

153

165 177 195 204 226

Hit 1 : Cyclopentaneacetic acid, 3-oxo-2-pentyl-, methyl esterC13H22O3; MF: 797; RMF: 825; Prob 70.7%; CAS: 24851-98-7; Lib: mainlib; ID: 41498.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 2400

50

100

27

4155

5967 74

83

96109

123 135

153

169 180 195 207 226O

O

O

Hit 2 : IsocitronellolC10H20O; MF: 687; RMF: 799; Prob 4.52%; CAS: 18479-52-2; Lib: mainlib; ID: 41109.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 2400

50

100

27

41

55

67

83

95109 123

138156

OH

Page 36 of 103

Page 38: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1138 (13.033 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 123

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 2400

50

100

29

41 55

59 6774

83

96 109119 135 149

153

169 195 204 226

Hit 1 : Cyclopentaneacetic acid, 3-oxo-2-pentyl-, methyl esterC13H22O3; MF: 811; RMF: 849; Prob 66.3%; CAS: 24851-98-7; Lib: mainlib; ID: 41498.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 2400

50

100

27

4155

5967 74

83

96109

123 135

153

169 180 195 207 226O

O

O

Hit 2 : IsocitronellolC10H20O; MF: 676; RMF: 806; Prob 2.51%; CAS: 18479-52-2; Lib: mainlib; ID: 41109.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 2400

50

100

27

41

55

67

83

95109 123

138156

OH

Page 37 of 103

Page 39: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1158 (13.261 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -1120

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29

41

55

69

81

93 107

121

136

149

164

173

196

204 222 243 264

Hit 1 : 2,6,10-Dodecatrien-1-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl-, (E,E)-C15H26O; MF: 740; RMF: 846; Prob 7.52%; CAS: 106-28-5; Lib: mainlib; ID: 3080.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

10041

53

69

81

93

107 121 136148 161 179 191 204 222

OH

Hit 2 : 1,6,10-Dodecatrien-3-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl-C15H26O; MF: 736; RMF: 763; Prob 6.35%; CAS: 7212-44-4; Lib: replib; ID: 7568.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

27

41

55

69

81

93

107

123136

148

161

177 189 204 222

HO

Page 38 of 103

Page 40: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1167 (13.364 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -117

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

55

65

79

83

94

105

119

132

145

157 177 189 200 218 231 281

Hit 1 : 6-(p-Tolyl)-2-methyl-2-heptenolC15H22O; MF: 867; RMF: 892; Prob 60.9%; CAS: 39599-18-3; Lib: mainlib; ID: 72280.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

43

55 65

77

91 105

119

132

145

157171 185

200218

OH

Hit 2 : Cedren-13-ol, 8-C15H24O; MF: 802; RMF: 822; Prob 9.80%; CAS: 18319-35-2; Lib: mainlib; ID: 71326.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

41

55

67

77

91105

119

132

145

161

173

189

202

220 OH

Page 39 of 103

Page 41: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1186 (13.581 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -278

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

55

67

77

93

105

119

132

149

161 177187204 220 238 281

Hit 1 : Bergamotol, Z-.alpha.-trans-C15H24O; MF: 839; RMF: 873; Prob 34.9%; CAS: 88034-74-6; Lib: mainlib; ID: 51309.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

43

55

68

79

93

107

119

132

145159 173

187 202 220

OH

Hit 2 : Cedren-13-ol, 8-C15H24O; MF: 830; RMF: 845; Prob 25.4%; CAS: 18319-35-2; Lib: mainlib; ID: 71326.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

41

55

67

77

91105

119

132

145

161

173

189

202

220 OH

Page 40 of 103

Page 42: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1201 (13.752 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 120

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29

43

55 69 79

93 105

119

133 147

161

175

189

204

222 246 264

Hit 1 : 1H-3a,7-Methanoazulen-6-ol, octahydro-3,6,8,8-tetramethyl-, acetate, [3R-(3.alpha.,3a.beta.,6.alpha.,7.beta.,8aC17H28O2; MF: 892; RMF: 897; Prob 20.7%; CAS: 77-54-3; Lib: mainlib; ID: 125471.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29

43

55 69 8195 105

119

133 147

161

175

189

204

222 249 264

O

O

Hit 2 : 1H-3a,7-Methanoazulen-6-ol, octahydro-3,6,8,8-tetramethyl-, acetate, [3R-(3.alpha.,3a.beta.,6.alpha.,7.beta.,8aC17H28O2; MF: 870; RMF: 904; Prob 20.7%; CAS: 77-54-3; Lib: replib; ID: 24049.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

43

55

69

81

93 105

119

133 147

161

175

189

204

222

O

O

Page 41 of 103

Page 43: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1216 (13.923 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -1149

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29 43

47

5165

75

91

103

119

135

149161

175 191 205

220

228 246266

281

Hit 1 : 2-Heptanone, 6-methyl-6-[3-methyl-3-(1-methylethenyl)-1-cyclopropen-1-yl]-C15H24O; MF: 672; RMF: 719; Prob 17.4%; CAS: 69296-87-3; Lib: mainlib; ID: 84618.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

27

43

5569

7785

91 105

119

135

147

162 177187 205220

O

Hit 2 : 1,4-Benzenediamine, N-(1-methylheptyl)-C14H24N2; MF: 670; RMF: 682; Prob 16.1%; CAS: 39563-50-3; Lib: mainlib; ID: 84554.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29 41

5365 80 93

107

119

135

148 161 177 191205

220

HN

NH2

Page 42 of 103

Page 44: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1222 (13.992 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -513

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

5569 77

91105115 128 141 157 171

184

199

213

229

243 258281

Hit 1 : Naphthalene, 6,7-diethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1,1,4,4-tetramethyl-C18H28; MF: 746; RMF: 780; Prob 56.5%; CAS: 55741-10-1; Lib: mainlib; ID: 134407.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

2941 57 65 77 91 105115 128 141 155 171 187 200 213

229

244

Hit 2 : Benzo[e](1H)indene, 1,2,3a,4,5,9b-hexahydro-7-methoxy-3-oxo-3a,9b-dimethyl-C16H20O2; MF: 698; RMF: 712; Prob 11.7%; Lib: mainlib; ID: 134337.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

41

5565

77 91103

115 128

141

159 172

187

201

211

229

244

O

O

Page 43 of 103

Page 45: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1254 (14.357 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 316

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

2941

5765 77 91

105115 128 143 155 171

185 198

213

228

243

258

Hit 1 : 7-Acetyl-6-ethyl-1,1,4,4-tetramethyltetralinC18H26O; MF: 925; RMF: 928; Prob 81.8%; CAS: 88-29-9; Lib: replib; ID: 25619.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

4157

6577 91

105115 128 141 155 171 185 198

213

228

243

258

O

Hit 2 : Cyclopenta[g]-2-benzopyran, 1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethyl-C18H26O; MF: 872; RMF: 886; Prob 16.2%; CAS: 1222-05-5; Lib: mainlib; ID: 138703.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

28 41 57 69 77 84 91 105 115 128 141 155 171 185 198

213

228

243

258

O

Page 44 of 103

Page 46: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1259 (14.414 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -109

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

57

71 91 105115 128 141

159

171

187 201

213 227

243

258

282

Hit 1 : 7-Acetyl-6-ethyl-1,1,4,4-tetramethyltetralinC18H26O; MF: 841; RMF: 873; Prob 75.2%; CAS: 88-29-9; Lib: replib; ID: 25601.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

57 65 77 91 105115 128 141 159 171 185 201213 227

243

258

O

Hit 2 : 7-Acetyl-6-ethyl-1,1,4,4-tetramethyltetralinC18H26O; MF: 827; RMF: 850; Prob 75.2%; CAS: 88-29-9; Lib: mainlib; ID: 138812.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

28

43

57 77 91 105115 128 141159

171187 201

214 227

243

258

O

Page 45 of 103

Page 47: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1292 (14.791 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 298

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29

43

55

71

82 95 109 123 137 149 165 177 193 213 229 243 258

Hit 1 : IsophytolC20H40O; MF: 914; RMF: 933; Prob 54.4%; CAS: 505-32-8; Lib: replib; ID: 8047.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29

43

55

71

82 95 109 123137 152 165 179 193 222 236 269

OH

Hit 2 : 1-Hexadecen-3-ol, 3,5,11,15-tetramethyl-C20H40O; MF: 902; RMF: 920; Prob 36.3%; Lib: mainlib; ID: 30894.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

43

57

71

8295

109 123137 151 165 179 193 222 236

OH

Page 46 of 103

Page 48: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1338 (15.316 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 993

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 3000

50

100

29

43

5765

77 91 103115 128

146 160 174 188 202 215 232 247 262

279

294

Hit 1 : Ethanone, 1-[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2,6-dimethyl-3,5-dinitrophenyl]-C14H18N2O5; MF: 958; RMF: 958; Prob 93.1%; CAS: 81-14-1; Lib: replib; ID: 3079.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 3000

50

100

29

43

5765

77 91 103115

128

146 160 174 191202 215 232 247 262

279

294

N N

O

O

O

O

O

Hit 2 : Ethanone, 1-[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2,6-dimethyl-3,5-dinitrophenyl]-C14H18N2O5; MF: 943; RMF: 953; Prob 93.1%; CAS: 81-14-1; Lib: replib; ID: 3078.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 3000

50

100

29

43

5765

77 91 103 115 128146 160 174 191202 215 232 247 262

279

294

N N

O

O

O

O

O

Page 47 of 103

Page 49: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1358 (15.545 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 885

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

41

55

69

86

98

112

125155

173

187

197

211

227

241 252 270

Hit 1 : Ethylene brassylateC15H26O4; MF: 960; RMF: 967; Prob 92.0%; CAS: 105-95-3; Lib: mainlib; ID: 16894.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

41

55

69

86

98

112

125

141155

173

187

197

211

227

241 252 270

O

O

O

O

Hit 2 : Z-11-PentadecenolC15H30O; MF: 684; RMF: 709; Prob 0.91%; Lib: mainlib; ID: 17391.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

41

55

69

8397

111

124

137151

166

179 192

208

226

OH

Page 48 of 103

Page 50: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1436 (16.435 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -520

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 3000

50

100

29

43

55

67

71

81

95107 121

127

153

163 177 189 207 229 247 281

Hit 1 : 9-(3,3-Dimethyloxiran-2-yl)-2,7-dimethylnona-2,6-dien-1-olC15H26O2; MF: 783; RMF: 832; Prob 12.5%; Lib: mainlib; ID: 39428.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 3000

50

100

29

43

55

59

71

81

8593

107121

135

153165 177 189 205 220

OH

O

Hit 2 : Oxirane, 2,2-dimethyl-3-(3,7,12,16,20-pentamethyl-3,7,11,15,19-heneicosapentaenyl)-, (all-E)-C30H50O; MF: 781; RMF: 798; Prob 11.5%; CAS: 7200-26-2; Lib: mainlib; ID: 28997.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 3000

50

100

29

43

55

69

81

85

95

107 121135

149161 175 189 203 217 231 257 271 289

O

Page 49 of 103

Page 51: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1512 (17.303 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = 256

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 3000

50

100

2941

5570

77 90 103118

133

147

161

169

178

191 207 219 231 243 273290

Hit 1 : 2-Propenoic acid, 3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-, 2-ethylhexyl esterC18H26O3; MF: 929; RMF: 935; Prob 82.4%; CAS: 5466-77-3; Lib: mainlib; ID: 113107.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 3000

50

100

2941

55 7077 90 103 118133

147

161

178

191 290

O

O

O

Hit 2 : 2-Propenoic acid, 3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-, 2-ethylhexyl esterC18H26O3; MF: 928; RMF: 931; Prob 82.4%; CAS: 5466-77-3; Lib: replib; ID: 22337.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 3000

50

100

2941 55 7077 90 103

118

133

147

161

178

191 262290

O

O

O

Page 50 of 103

Page 52: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1563 (17.885 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -207

20 50 80 110 140 170 200 230 260 290 320 350 380 410 4400

50

100

39

51

65

77

85

91

115

131

149 173219

235 264 281 315331 355 381 429

Hit 1 : Cinnamyl cinnamateC18H16O2; MF: 761; RMF: 874; Prob 45.6%; CAS: 122-69-0; Lib: mainlib; ID: 82160.

20 50 80 110 140 170 200 230 260 290 320 350 380 410 4400

50

100

3951

65

7791

117

131

147 173 192

219

236264

O

O

Hit 2 : 1,3-Bis(cinnamoyloxymethyl)adamantaneC30H32O4; MF: 667; RMF: 715; Prob 3.73%; CAS: 303797-58-2; Lib: mainlib; ID: 82083.

20 50 80 110 140 170 200 230 260 290 320 350 380 410 4400

50

100

41

67

77

91

103

131

147

160 177193 217 262 280 308 326

O

O

O

O

Page 51 of 103

Page 53: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1908 (21.825 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -1210

20 60 100 140 180 220 260 300 340 380 420 460 5000

50

100

29

4155

73

91133

147

207

218

253

267

281

341394 429 479 503

Hit 1 : 1-Monolinoleoylglycerol trimethylsilyl etherC27H54O4Si2; MF: 653; RMF: 693; Prob 11.3%; CAS: 54284-45-6; Lib: mainlib; ID: 34242.

20 60 100 140 180 220 260 300 340 380 420 460 5000

50

100

34

73

81 103

129

147

207

221

262

281

341 369395

482

O

O

O

O

Si

Si

Hit 2 : 2-[4-methyl-6-(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-enyl)hexa-1,3,5-trienyl]cyclohex-1-en-1-carboxaldehydeC23H32O; MF: 652; RMF: 689; Prob 10.9%; Lib: mainlib; ID: 5319.

20 60 100 140 180 220 260 300 340 380 420 460 5000

50

10043

55

6991

105123

135

149 173

239 269

324HO

Page 52 of 103

Page 54: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 2105 (24.074 min): Designer3.DCompound in Library Factor = -1169

20 60 100 140 180 220 260 300 340 380 420 460 5000

50

100

29

4155

73

81 96 133

207

218

253281

341377 405 429 455 479 503

Hit 1 : 1-Monolinoleoylglycerol trimethylsilyl etherC27H54O4Si2; MF: 665; RMF: 718; Prob 16.3%; CAS: 54284-45-6; Lib: mainlib; ID: 34242.

20 60 100 140 180 220 260 300 340 380 420 460 5000

50

100

34

73

81 103

129

147

207

221

262

281

341 369395

482

O

O

O

O

Si

Si

Hit 2 : BetulinC30H50O2; MF: 648; RMF: 660; Prob 8.87%; CAS: 473-98-3; Lib: replib; ID: 23168.

20 60 100 140 180 220 260 300 340 380 420 460 5000

50

100

29

41 55

69

81

95

121

135

147

175

189

203

234

245 288 313 337363 411

442

OH

HO

Page 53 of 103

Page 55: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

DMS RESULTS  Imitation

Page 54 of 103

Page 56: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

File : C:\HPCHEM\1\DATA\2010\JOB2010\EXPDEF\Imitation2.DOperator : KRAcquired : 5 Jun 2010 20:55 using AcqMethod DESORP2 Instrument : DMS InstrSample Name: Imitation .1ul Misc Info : desorp2 inj 310 ramp 50-320 15C/min Vial Number: 100

2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 30.00 32.00 34.00

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

1600000

1800000

2000000

2200000

2400000

2600000

2800000

3000000

3200000

3400000

3600000

3800000

4000000

4200000

4400000

4600000

Time-->

Abundance TIC: Imitation2.D

2.32

2.48

3.05

3.24

3.56

4.29

5.52

5.96

6.49

6.78 7.05

7.23

7.89

8.21

8.58

8.66

8.84

9.74

9.85

10.03

10.45

10.50 10.56

10.69

10.82

11.30

12.02 12.25

12.57

12.64

12.75

13.11

13.47

13.55

13.78

14.19

14.26

15.12

15.36

17.32

Page 55 of 103

Page 57: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 200 (2.316 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 614

20 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 50 53 56 590

50

100

29

30

31

3233 40414243

45

46

47

Hit 1 : Ethyl alcoholC2H6O; MF: 973; RMF: 978; Prob 98.1%; CAS: 64-17-5; Lib: mainlib; ID: 1334.

20 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 50 53 56 590

50

100

242526

27

28

29

30

31

33 4142

43

44

45

46

47

OH

Hit 2 : Ethyl alcoholC2H6O; MF: 945; RMF: 945; Prob 98.1%; CAS: 64-17-5; Lib: replib; ID: 552.

20 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 50 53 56 590

50

100

242526

27

2829

30

31

3233 40414243

44

45

46

47

OH

Page 56 of 103

Page 58: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 214 (2.475 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 614

20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 680

50

100

29

30

31

3243

45

46

47 59

Hit 1 : Ethyl alcoholC2H6O; MF: 971; RMF: 978; Prob 97.7%; CAS: 64-17-5; Lib: mainlib; ID: 1334.

20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 680

50

100

26

27

28

29

30

31

33

43

44

45

46

47

OH

Hit 2 : Ethyl alcoholC2H6O; MF: 934; RMF: 934; Prob 97.7%; CAS: 64-17-5; Lib: replib; ID: 552.

20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 680

50

100

26

2729

31

32

43

45

46

47

OH

Page 57 of 103

Page 59: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 264 (3.046 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 199

20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 680

50

100

29

31

32 38

39

40

41

42

43

45

47 50 53 5557

59

Hit 1 : IsobutaneC4H10; MF: 898; RMF: 962; Prob 83.5%; CAS: 75-28-5; Lib: replib; ID: 1629.

20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 680

50

100

26

27

29

39

40

41

42

43

44 50 53 55 57

Hit 2 : IsobutaneC4H10; MF: 889; RMF: 923; Prob 83.5%; CAS: 75-28-5; Lib: mainlib; ID: 5254.

20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 680

50

100

20 26

27

2938

39

40

41

43

44 50 53 55 57 59

Page 58 of 103

Page 60: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 281 (3.240 min): Imitation.DCompound in Library Factor = 449

20 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 50 53 56 590

50

100

29

31

33 40414243

45

46

47

Hit 1 : Ethyl alcoholC2H6O; MF: 918; RMF: 918; Prob 93.9%; CAS: 64-17-5; Lib: replib; ID: 551.

20 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 50 53 56 590

50

100

22 242526

27

28

29

30

31

3233 3940414243

44

45

46

47

OH

Hit 2 : Ethyl alcoholC2H6O; MF: 911; RMF: 912; Prob 93.9%; CAS: 64-17-5; Lib: mainlib; ID: 1334.

20 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 50 53 56 590

50

100

242526

27

28

29

30

31

33 4142

43

44

45

46

47

OH

Page 59 of 103

Page 61: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 309 (3.560 min): Imitation.DCompound in Library Factor = 178

20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 680

50

100

29

31

3239

41

42

43

44

45

47 50 53 5557

59

60

Hit 1 : 2-Propanol, 2-methyl-C4H10O; MF: 913; RMF: 916; Prob 61.7%; CAS: 75-65-0; Lib: replib; ID: 6416.

20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 680

50

100

27 29

31

32 38

39

40

41

42

43

44 50 53 55

57

58

59

60

OH

Hit 2 : 2-Propanol, 2-methyl-C4H10O; MF: 909; RMF: 914; Prob 61.7%; CAS: 75-65-0; Lib: replib; ID: 6395.

20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 680

50

100

27 29

31

3239

4143

45 50 53 55

57

58

59

60

OH

Page 60 of 103

Page 62: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 373 (4.291 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 242

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 1400

50

100

29

33

43

45

5761

7376 87 101 117 131

Hit 1 : Propylene GlycolC3H8O2; MF: 913; RMF: 929; Prob 39.3%; CAS: 57-55-6; Lib: replib; ID: 3553.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 1400

50

100

29

33

43

45

5761

76

OH

HO

Hit 2 : (S)-(+)-1,2-PropanediolC3H8O2; MF: 912; RMF: 933; Prob 37.8%; CAS: 4254-15-3; Lib: replib; ID: 3557.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 1400

50

100

31

43

45

57 61 75

OH

OH

Page 61 of 103

Page 63: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 481 (5.524 min): Imitation.DCompound in Library Factor = -217

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

29

45

53 67

77

87

93

105 121136

207

Hit 1 : 1R-.alpha.-PineneC10H16; MF: 880; RMF: 937; Prob 17.6%; CAS: 7785-70-8; Lib: replib; ID: 12053.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

41

5367

77

93

105 121 136

Hit 2 : .alpha.-PineneC10H16; MF: 876; RMF: 941; Prob 14.9%; CAS: 80-56-8; Lib: mainlib; ID: 51652.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

2741

53

5867

77

93

105121

136

Page 62 of 103

Page 64: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 519 (5.958 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = -107

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

29

41

45 53

69

79

93

107121

136207

Hit 1 : Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane, 6,6-dimethyl-2-methylene-, (1S)-C10H16; MF: 929; RMF: 942; Prob 28.4%; CAS: 18172-67-3; Lib: replib; ID: 11958.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

27

41

53

6979

93

107121

136

Hit 2 : .beta.-PineneC10H16; MF: 927; RMF: 929; Prob 26.2%; CAS: 127-91-3; Lib: replib; ID: 11947.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

27

41

53

69

79

93

107121 136

Page 63 of 103

Page 65: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 566 (6.495 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = -113

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500

50

100

29

37

39

4551

53

55 59 65

68

71

77

79

89

93

107 121136

Hit 1 : LimoneneC10H16; MF: 912; RMF: 919; Prob 25.0%; CAS: 138-86-3; Lib: replib; ID: 7399.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500

50

100

27

29

32

39

41

51

53

55

58

65

68

77

79

89

93

107 121 136

Hit 2 : LimoneneC10H16; MF: 897; RMF: 932; Prob 25.0%; CAS: 138-86-3; Lib: replib; ID: 7398.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500

50

100

27 41

43 51

53

55

68

71

77

79

93

107 121 136

Page 64 of 103

Page 66: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 591 (6.780 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = -394

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

31

45

51

59

6571

77

93

103

121

128

136

207

Hit 1 : 1,4-Cyclohexadiene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-C10H16; MF: 793; RMF: 903; Prob 22.6%; CAS: 99-85-4; Lib: replib; ID: 12040.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

27 39

51 65

77

93

105

121 136

Hit 2 : 1,4-Cyclohexadiene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-C10H16; MF: 785; RMF: 829; Prob 22.6%; CAS: 99-85-4; Lib: replib; ID: 12042.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

2739

51

58

65

77

93

105

121 136

Page 65 of 103

Page 67: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 615 (7.054 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 125

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

31

41

45

59

75 89

103

207

Hit 1 : 1-Propanol, 2-(2-hydroxypropoxy)-C6H14O3; MF: 918; RMF: 918; Prob 38.3%; CAS: 106-62-7; Lib: mainlib; ID: 24523.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

31

41

45

59

75 8994

103

115 134

O

HO OH

Hit 2 : 1-Propanol, 2-(2-hydroxypropoxy)-C6H14O3; MF: 916; RMF: 919; Prob 38.3%; CAS: 106-62-7; Lib: replib; ID: 6407.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

3145

59

75 89

103

O

HO OH

Page 66 of 103

Page 68: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 630 (7.225 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 102

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

31

43

55

71

80

83

93

103121

127136

154 207

Hit 1 : 1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-C10H18O; MF: 875; RMF: 876; Prob 64.7%; CAS: 78-70-6; Lib: mainlib; ID: 30690.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

27

41

55

59

71

80

83

93

107

121

127136

154

OH

Hit 2 : 1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-C10H18O; MF: 868; RMF: 874; Prob 64.7%; CAS: 78-70-6; Lib: replib; ID: 8161.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

27

41

55

59

71

80

83

93

107

121

127136

OH

Page 67 of 103

Page 69: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 688 (7.888 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 265

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

31

39

43

51 65

79

86

91

108

134

150

207 253

Hit 1 : Acetic acid, phenylmethyl esterC9H10O2; MF: 935; RMF: 943; Prob 85.6%; CAS: 140-11-4; Lib: replib; ID: 14560.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

27

39

43

51 65

79

86

91

108

150

O

O

Hit 2 : Acetic acid, phenylmethyl esterC9H10O2; MF: 928; RMF: 936; Prob 85.6%; CAS: 140-11-4; Lib: mainlib; ID: 64787.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

27

39

43

51 65

79

86

91

108

150

O

O

Page 68 of 103

Page 70: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 716 (8.207 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 242

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

31

43

55

59

67

81

93

107

121136

207 253 281

Hit 1 : p-menth-1-en-8-olC10H18O; MF: 918; RMF: 925; Prob 44.4%; Lib: mainlib; ID: 25072.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

31

43

55

59

67

81

93

107

121136

154OH

Hit 2 : 3-Cyclohexene-1-methanol, .alpha.,.alpha.4-trimethyl-C10H18O; MF: 906; RMF: 912; Prob 29.6%; CAS: 98-55-5; Lib: replib; ID: 6602.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

31

43

55

59

67

81

93

107

121 136

154

OH

Page 69 of 103

Page 71: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 749 (8.584 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = -168

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

31

41

55

69

81

95

109 123138 156 207 253 281

Hit 1 : 6-Octen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, (R)-C10H20O; MF: 888; RMF: 898; Prob 24.4%; CAS: 1117-61-9; Lib: mainlib; ID: 28138.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

27

41

55

69

8195

109123

138156

OH

Hit 2 : 2-Octen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-C10H20O; MF: 888; RMF: 891; Prob 24.4%; CAS: 40607-48-5; Lib: mainlib; ID: 28107.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

10041

55

69

81

95

109123

138 156

OH

Page 70 of 103

Page 72: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 756 (8.664 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = -103

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

31 4151

59

65

69

77

91

103

117

136

156 207 253 281

Hit 1 : BenzenepropanolC9H12O; MF: 873; RMF: 944; Prob 68.4%; CAS: 122-97-4; Lib: replib; ID: 11463.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

3139

51

65 77

91

103

117

136

OH

Hit 2 : BenzenepropanolC9H12O; MF: 845; RMF: 909; Prob 68.4%; CAS: 122-97-4; Lib: mainlib; ID: 48216.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

2739 51

65 77

91

105

117

136

OH

Page 71 of 103

Page 73: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 771 (8.835 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 146

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600

50

100

29

39

41

43

51

53

5567

69

80

83

93

107

121

136154

Hit 1 : 1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, 2-aminobenzoateC17H23NO2; MF: 963; RMF: 967; Prob 72.7%; CAS: 7149-26-0; Lib: mainlib; ID: 51289.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600

50

100

27

31

39

41

43

51

53

5567

69

71

77

80

83

91

93

105113

121

136154

NH2

O

O

Hit 2 : 1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetateC12H20O2; MF: 916; RMF: 917; Prob 15.2%; CAS: 115-95-7; Lib: mainlib; ID: 51290.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600

50

100

27

31

39

43

45

55

60 65

69

71

80

8389

93

107113

121

127

136

154

O

O

Page 72 of 103

Page 74: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 850 (9.737 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = -151

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

55

61

69

81

95

109

123

138

151 169 207 253 281

Hit 1 : 2,6-Octadiene, 2,6-dimethyl-C10H18; MF: 896; RMF: 901; Prob 24.6%; CAS: 2792-39-4; Lib: replib; ID: 2290.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

10043

55

61

69 81

95

109

123

138

Hit 2 : 6-Octen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetateC12H22O2; MF: 889; RMF: 905; Prob 18.8%; CAS: 150-84-5; Lib: replib; ID: 7605.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

27

43

55

61

69

8195

109

123

138

155 199

OO

Page 73 of 103

Page 75: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 860 (9.852 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 103

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

41

53

69

80

93

107121

136154 207 253 281

Hit 1 : 2,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetate, (Z)-C12H20O2; MF: 918; RMF: 947; Prob 51.8%; CAS: 141-12-8; Lib: replib; ID: 7487.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

27

41

53

69

80

93

107121 136

154

OO

Hit 2 : 2,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetateC12H20O2; MF: 897; RMF: 926; Prob 22.1%; CAS: 16409-44-2; Lib: replib; ID: 7488.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100 41

53

69

80

93

107

121 136

154

O

O

Page 74 of 103

Page 76: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 876 (10.034 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 141

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29

43

53

69

80

93

107121 136

154 207 253

Hit 1 : 2,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetateC12H20O2; MF: 944; RMF: 952; Prob 50.6%; CAS: 16409-44-2; Lib: replib; ID: 7488.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100 41

53

69

80

93

107

121 136

154

O

O

Hit 2 : 2,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetate, (Z)-C12H20O2; MF: 923; RMF: 930; Prob 21.5%; CAS: 141-12-8; Lib: replib; ID: 7487.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

27

41

53

69

80

84

93

107121 136

154

OO

Page 75 of 103

Page 77: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 912 (10.445 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 144

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 2100

50

100

29 39

53

6577

81

93

109123

137

151

161 204

Hit 1 : VanillinC8H8O3; MF: 952; RMF: 952; Prob 59.4%; CAS: 121-33-5; Lib: replib; ID: 20015.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 2100

50

100

29 39

5365

81

93

109123

137

151

O

O

HO

Hit 2 : VanillinC8H8O3; MF: 944; RMF: 944; Prob 59.4%; CAS: 121-33-5; Lib: mainlib; ID: 98716.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 2100

50

100

27 3951

65

81

95

109123

137

152

O

O

HO

Page 76 of 103

Page 78: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 917 (10.502 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = -509

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

29

41

55 6977

93

105

119

133

151

161

175189

204

253 281 331

Hit 1 : 1H-3a,7-Methanoazulene, 2,3,4,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,6,8,8-tetramethyl-, [3R-(3.alpha.,3a.beta.,7.beta.,8a.alpha.C15H24; MF: 796; RMF: 893; Prob 11.2%; CAS: 469-61-4; Lib: replib; ID: 15877.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

29

41

55

69

77

93

105

119

147

161

175 189

204

Hit 2 : 1H-3a,7-Methanoazulene, 2,3,4,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,6,8,8-tetramethyl-, [3R-(3.alpha.,3a.beta.,7.beta.,8a.alpha.C15H24; MF: 788; RMF: 862; Prob 11.2%; CAS: 469-61-4; Lib: replib; ID: 15876.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

27

41

55

69

77

93

105

119

147

161

175 189

204

Page 77 of 103

Page 79: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 922 (10.559 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = -168

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

29

41

55

69

79

93

105

120

133

151

161

175 189204 253 281 327

Hit 1 : CaryophylleneC15H24; MF: 883; RMF: 938; Prob 32.9%; CAS: 87-44-5; Lib: replib; ID: 1122.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

27

41

55

69

79

93

107120

133

147 161

175189

204

Hit 2 : Bicyclo[7.2.0]undec-4-ene, 4,11,11-trimethyl-8-methylene-,[1R-(1R*,4Z,9S*)]-C15H24; MF: 860; RMF: 910; Prob 12.0%; CAS: 118-65-0; Lib: replib; ID: 1121.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 3400

50

100

27

41

55

69

79

93

107120

133

148 161

175189 204

Page 78 of 103

Page 80: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 933 (10.685 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = -331

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

55

67

79

91

105

115133

147

161 176 189204

253 281

Hit 1 : ThujopseneC15H24; MF: 847; RMF: 857; Prob 9.31%; CAS: 470-40-6; Lib: mainlib; ID: 72266.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

41

5569 81

93 105

119

133

147 161175

189

204

Hit 2 : Azulene, 1,2,3,3a,4,5,6,7-octahydro-1,4-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)-, [1R-(1.alpha.,3a.beta.,4.alpha.,7.beta.)]-C15H24; MF: 830; RMF: 846; Prob 5.08%; CAS: 22567-17-5; Lib: replib; ID: 1192.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

10041

55

67

81

91 105

119

133147

161

175

189204

Page 79 of 103

Page 81: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 945 (10.822 min): Imitation.DCompound in Library Factor = -119

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

29

3945

51

63

7479 86

89

98 105

118

122

133

146

151 161 175 189 204

Hit 1 : 2H-1-Benzopyran-2-oneC9H6O2; MF: 840; RMF: 907; Prob 73.3%; CAS: 91-64-5; Lib: replib; ID: 15749.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

2639

4551

63

74 86

90

98

118

146

O O

Hit 2 : 2H-1-Benzopyran-2-oneC9H6O2; MF: 839; RMF: 908; Prob 73.3%; CAS: 91-64-5; Lib: replib; ID: 15748.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

2631

3945

51

63

74 86

90

98

118

146

O O

Page 80 of 103

Page 82: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 987 (11.302 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = -328

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

41 55

65

77

91 107121

135

149

163

173

191

206

220 253 281

Hit 1 : 3-Ethyl-4,4-dimethyl-2-(2-methylpropenyl)cyclohex-2-enoneC14H22O; MF: 836; RMF: 840; Prob 17.0%; CAS: 97452-08-9; Lib: mainlib; ID: 120006.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

41

55

69

77

91 107

121

135

145

159

177

191

206

O

Hit 2 : 3-Buten-2-one, 3-methyl-4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)-C14H22O; MF: 833; RMF: 836; Prob 15.0%; CAS: 13743-21-0; Lib: mainlib; ID: 86213.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

53 6579

91

95

107

123

135

150

163177

191

206 O

Page 81 of 103

Page 83: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1050 (12.021 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 398

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 2300

50

100

29

3950

65 76

85

93 105121

132

149

164

177

194 207 222

Hit 1 : Diethyl PhthalateC12H14O4; MF: 942; RMF: 962; Prob 85.9%; CAS: 84-66-2; Lib: replib; ID: 19810.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 2300

50

100

29 3950

65 7693 105 121

132

149

177

222

O

O

O

O

Hit 2 : Diethyl PhthalateC12H14O4; MF: 920; RMF: 923; Prob 85.9%; CAS: 84-66-2; Lib: replib; ID: 19812.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 2300

50

100

29

39 5057

65 76 93 105 121132

149

163

177

194 222

O

O

O

O

Page 82 of 103

Page 84: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1070 (12.249 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = -104

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

55 6981

95

107121

135

150

165177 189

207222 281

Hit 1 : CedrolC15H26O; MF: 910; RMF: 913; Prob 39.8%; CAS: 77-53-2; Lib: mainlib; ID: 53559.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

55

59

6981

95

107121 135

150

165177 189

207222

HO

Hit 2 : EpicedrolC15H26O; MF: 906; RMF: 912; Prob 33.7%; Lib: mainlib; ID: 53558.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

55 69

81

95

109

121

135

150

165 177 189 207222

H

OH

Page 83 of 103

Page 85: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1098 (12.569 min): Imitation.DCompound in Library Factor = -113

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 2400

50

100

29

41 55

59 67 74

83

96109

123 137

153

169 195 226

Hit 1 : Cyclopentaneacetic acid, 3-oxo-2-pentyl-, methyl esterC13H22O3; MF: 806; RMF: 828; Prob 75.3%; CAS: 24851-98-7; Lib: mainlib; ID: 41498.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 2400

50

100

27

4155

5967 74

83

96109

123 135

153

169 180 195 207 226O

O

O

Hit 2 : IsocitronellolC10H20O; MF: 678; RMF: 790; Prob 3.23%; CAS: 18479-52-2; Lib: mainlib; ID: 41109.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 2400

50

100

27

41

55

67

83

95109 123

138156

OH

Page 84 of 103

Page 86: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1104 (12.638 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = -688

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 2400

50

100

29

43

55

59

67

83

93107

119 135 149

153

161

175189 204

226

Hit 1 : CubenolC15H26O; MF: 807; RMF: 862; Prob 15.2%; CAS: 21284-22-0; Lib: mainlib; ID: 71320.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 2400

50

100 41

59

67

81

93105

119

135147

161

175

179 189

204

OH

Hit 2 : 2-Naphthalenemethanol, decahydro-.alpha.,.alpha.,4a-trimethyl-8-methylene-, [2R-(2.alpha.,4a.alpha.,8a.beta.)C15H26O; MF: 798; RMF: 854; Prob 11.0%; CAS: 473-15-4; Lib: mainlib; ID: 25231.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 2400

50

100

43

55

59

67 79 93 108

122135

149

164

175

189204

222

HO

Page 85 of 103

Page 87: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1114 (12.752 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = -143

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 2400

50

100

29

41 55

59 6774

83

95109

123 135

153

161 179 189 207 226

Hit 1 : Cyclopentaneacetic acid, 3-oxo-2-pentyl-, methyl esterC13H22O3; MF: 799; RMF: 843; Prob 46.2%; CAS: 24851-98-7; Lib: mainlib; ID: 41498.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 2400

50

100

27

4155

5967 74

83

96109

123 135

153

169 180 195 207 226O

O

O

Hit 2 : 9-Undecenoic acid, 2,6,10-trimethyl-C14H26O2; MF: 696; RMF: 700; Prob 3.26%; Lib: mainlib; ID: 28039.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 2400

50

100

41

55

69

74

83

87

97

109125 138 152

165 180 193 208

226O

HO

Page 86 of 103

Page 88: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1145 (13.106 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = -407

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

5569

8193

107

119

135 148 161

173191 204

222 243 264 281

Hit 1 : EpiglobulolC15H26O; MF: 819; RMF: 841; Prob 10.8%; Lib: mainlib; ID: 5651.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

55

6982

93

109

121

133 147

161

175

189204

222

H

HHO

Hit 2 : 1H-Benzocyclohepten-7-ol, 2,3,4,4a,5,6,7,8-octahydro-1,1,4a,7-tetramethyl-, cis-C15H26O; MF: 815; RMF: 829; Prob 9.12%; CAS: 6892-80-4; Lib: replib; ID: 19977.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

41

55

69

81

95

107

119

133

151

161

175

189204

222

OH

Page 87 of 103

Page 89: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1177 (13.471 min): Imitation.DCompound in Library Factor = 278

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

29

32

39

51

55

65

69

77

91

105

119 135 152 167175 185

194204

212

Hit 1 : Benzyl BenzoateC14H12O2; MF: 888; RMF: 938; Prob 88.8%; CAS: 120-51-4; Lib: replib; ID: 13845.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

2739

44

5165

77

91

105

122 152167

194 212

O

O

Hit 2 : Benzyl BenzoateC14H12O2; MF: 881; RMF: 941; Prob 88.8%; CAS: 120-51-4; Lib: mainlib; ID: 61201.

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200

50

100

2739

5165

77

91

105

152167 194

212

O

O

Page 88 of 103

Page 90: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1184 (13.551 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = -197

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29

43

55 6981

95 105

119

133 147

161175

189

204

222 234 249

Hit 1 : 1H-3a,7-Methanoazulen-6-ol, octahydro-3,6,8,8-tetramethyl-, acetate, [3R-(3.alpha.,3a.beta.,6.alpha.,7.beta.,8aC17H28O2; MF: 876; RMF: 878; Prob 17.8%; CAS: 77-54-3; Lib: mainlib; ID: 125471.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29

43

55 69 8195 105

119

133 147

161

175

189

204

222 249

O

O

Hit 2 : 1H-3a,7-Methanoazulen-6-ol, octahydro-3,6,8,8-tetramethyl-, acetate, [3R-(3.alpha.,3a.beta.,6.alpha.,7.beta.,8aC17H28O2; MF: 867; RMF: 897; Prob 17.8%; CAS: 77-54-3; Lib: replib; ID: 24049.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

43

55

60

69

81

93 105

119

133 147

161

175

189

204

222

O

O

Page 89 of 103

Page 91: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1204 (13.779 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 224

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

60

73

8397

102

111

129

143 157 171185

199

211

218

228

270

Hit 1 : Isopropyl MyristateC17H34O2; MF: 909; RMF: 914; Prob 77.4%; CAS: 110-27-0; Lib: replib; ID: 2233.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

60

73

8597

102

111129

143 157 171185

199

211

228

270

O

O

Hit 2 : Isopropyl MyristateC17H34O2; MF: 908; RMF: 912; Prob 77.4%; CAS: 110-27-0; Lib: mainlib; ID: 9582.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

60

73

85 97

102

111

129

143 157 171

185

199

211

228

255 270

O

O

Page 90 of 103

Page 92: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1240 (14.190 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 473

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

29 4157

65 77 91105

115 128 143 155 171185 198

213

228

243

258

Hit 1 : 7-Acetyl-6-ethyl-1,1,4,4-tetramethyltetralinC18H26O; MF: 926; RMF: 928; Prob 80.2%; CAS: 88-29-9; Lib: replib; ID: 25619.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

4157

6577 91

105115 128 141 155 171 185 198

213

228

243

258

O

Hit 2 : Cyclopenta[g]-2-benzopyran, 1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethyl-C18H26O; MF: 884; RMF: 895; Prob 18.0%; CAS: 1222-05-5; Lib: mainlib; ID: 138703.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 2600

50

100

28 41 57 69 77 84 91 105 115 128 141 155 171 185 198

213

228

243

258

O

Page 91 of 103

Page 93: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1246 (14.259 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 204

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

5765 77 91 105

115 128 141

159

171

187 201

213 227

243

258

282

Hit 1 : 7-Acetyl-6-ethyl-1,1,4,4-tetramethyltetralinC18H26O; MF: 867; RMF: 879; Prob 59.2%; CAS: 88-29-9; Lib: replib; ID: 25601.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

43

57 65 77 91 105115 128 141 159 171 185 201213 227

243

258

O

Hit 2 : Ethanone, 1-(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-3,5,5,6,8,8-hexamethyl-2-naphthalenyl)-C18H26O; MF: 853; RMF: 914; Prob 37.1%; CAS: 1506-02-1; Lib: mainlib; ID: 138466.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

43

57 65 77 91 105115

128 141

159

171

187 201

213 228

243

258

O

Page 92 of 103

Page 94: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1321 (15.115 min): Imitation2.DCompound in Library Factor = 993

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 3000

50

100

29

43

5765

77 91 103 115 128146 160 174 191202 215 232 247 262

279

294

Hit 1 : Ethanone, 1-[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2,6-dimethyl-3,5-dinitrophenyl]-C14H18N2O5; MF: 954; RMF: 954; Prob 93.2%; CAS: 81-14-1; Lib: replib; ID: 3079.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 3000

50

100

29

43

5765

77 91 103115

128

146 160 174 191202 215 232 247 262

279

294

N N

O

O

O

O

O

Hit 2 : Ethanone, 1-[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2,6-dimethyl-3,5-dinitrophenyl]-C14H18N2O5; MF: 952; RMF: 960; Prob 93.2%; CAS: 81-14-1; Lib: replib; ID: 3078.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 3000

50

100

29

43

5765

77 91 103 115 128146 160 174 191202 215 232 247 262

279

294

N N

O

O

O

O

O

Page 93 of 103

Page 95: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1342 (15.355 min): Imitation.DCompound in Library Factor = 797

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

41

55

69

86

98

112

125155

173187

197

211

227

241 252 270 281

Hit 1 : Ethylene brassylateC15H26O4; MF: 949; RMF: 956; Prob 90.4%; CAS: 105-95-3; Lib: mainlib; ID: 16894.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

29

41

55

69

86

98

112

125

141155

173

187

197

211

227

241 252 270

O

O

O

O

Hit 2 : Z-11-PentadecenolC15H30O; MF: 690; RMF: 710; Prob 0.90%; Lib: mainlib; ID: 17391.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2800

50

100

41

55

69

8397

111

124

137151

166

179 192

208

226

OH

Page 94 of 103

Page 96: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

** Search Report Page 1 of 1 **

Unknown: Scan 1514 (17.319 min): Imitation.DCompound in Library Factor = -119

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 3600

50

100

29

41

55

69 81

91

107

121

135

145 159

187

207

229

243

259

271

303

318

327 341355

Hit 1 : 1-Phenanthrenecarboxylic acid, 7-ethenyl-1,2,3,4,4a,4b,5,6,7,8,10,10a-dodecahydro-1,4a,7-trimethyl-, methyl eC21H34O2; MF: 871; RMF: 890; Prob 71.9%; CAS: 72088-13-2; Lib: mainlib; ID: 138475.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 3600

50

100

29

4155

6979

91 105121

133 159 173187

201 215229

243

259

271 289

303

318

O

O

Hit 2 : 1-Phenanthrenecarboxylic acid, 1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,7,8,9,10,10a-dodecahydro-1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethyl)-, metC21H34O2; MF: 815; RMF: 879; Prob 13.7%; CAS: 33892-15-8; Lib: mainlib; ID: 138505.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 3600

50

100

70

79

91

105121

131

145159

177

187

201 215

243

259

271

303318

O

O

Page 95 of 103

Page 97: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

TGA RESULTS 

Page 96 of 103

Page 98: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

84.97%(20.50mg)

10.40%(2.510mg)

4.123%(0.9949mg)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Deriv. W

eight (%/°C)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Weight (%)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Temperature (°C)

Sample: Designer

Size:  24.1320 mgMethod: Ramp

TGA File: I:...\dsc pan Designer.001

Run Date: 09­Jun­2010 15:52Instrument: TGA Q500 V20.8 Build 34

Universal V4.5A TA Instruments

Page 97 of 103

Page 99: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

29.91%(3.437mg)

61.87%(7.109mg)

7.100%(0.8158mg)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Deriv. W

eight (%/°C)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Weight (%)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Temperature (°C)

Sample: Designer

Size:  11.4910 mgMethod: Ramp

TGA File: I:...\dsc pan Designer.002

Run Date: 09­Jun­2010 19:24Instrument: TGA Q500 V20.8 Build 34

Universal V4.5A TA Instruments

Page 98 of 103

Page 100: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

93.82%(55.93mg)

5.333%(3.179mg)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Deriv. W

eight (%/°C)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Weight (%)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Temperature (°C)

Sample: Imitation

Size:  59.6190 mgMethod: Ramp

TGA File: I:...\manual Imitation.001

Run Date: 08­Jun­2010 15:44Instrument: TGA Q500 V20.8 Build 34

Universal V4.5A TA Instruments

Page 99 of 103

Page 101: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

5.799%(0.8254mg)

93.83%(13.35mg)

0

1

2

3

4

5

Deriv. W

eight (%/°C)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Weight (%)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Temperature (°C)

Sample: Imitation

Size:  14.2320 mgMethod: Ramp

TGA File: I:...\dsc pan Imitation.002

Run Date: 09­Jun­2010 18:24Instrument: TGA Q500 V20.8 Build 34

Universal V4.5A TA Instruments

Page 100 of 103

Page 102: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

GC-FID RESULTS 

Page 101 of 103

Page 103: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

File : C:\HPCHEM\1\DATA\2010\JOB2010\EXPDEF\GC-FID DATA\Designer.DOperator : KVAcquired : 8 Jun 2010 11:06 using AcqMethod JORDIGEL.MInstrument : HP5890Sample Name: Designer Perfume Misc Info : Vial Number: 10

0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 30.00 32.00

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

1600000

1800000

2000000

2200000

2400000

2600000

2800000

3000000

3200000

3400000

3600000

3800000

4000000

4200000

4400000

Time

Response_ Designer.D\FID1A

View Mode: Integration

Page 102 of 103

Page 104: Perfume: Generic vs. Name Brand CASE STUDY Perfume ...The decomposition of the Designer sample took place in three steps. The large initial weight loss is most likely due to loss of

File : C:\HPCHEM\1\DATA\2010\JOB2010\EXPDEF\GC-FID DATA\Imitation.DOperator : KVAcquired : 8 Jun 2010 13:09 using AcqMethod JORDIGEL.MInstrument : HP5890Sample Name: Imitation Perfume Misc Info : Vial Number: 11

0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 30.00 32.00

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

1600000

1800000

2000000

2200000

2400000

2600000

2800000

3000000

3200000

3400000

3600000

3800000

4000000

4200000

4400000

4600000

4800000

Time

Response_ Imitation.D\FID1A

View Mode: Integration

Page 103 of 103