Performance Reviews that don’t suck Keith Fuller IGDA Leadership Summit 2015
Jan 01, 2016
What are Reviews Supposed to Do?
Official recognition from the company of the employee’s contributions, resulting in appropriate changes in compensation and responsibility according to company standards
Aligning with business goalsBonuses and compensationCareer PathDevelopmentEmployee needs to know what the company thinks of them
Aligning with business goalsBonuses and compensationCareer PathDevelopmentEmployee needs to know what the company thinks of them
Aligning with business goalsBonuses and compensationCareer PathDevelopmentEmployee needs to know what the company thinks of them
Aligning with business goalsBonuses and compensationCareer PathDevelopmentEmployee needs to know what the company thinks of them
Aligning with business goalsBonuses and compensationCareer PathDevelopmentEmployee needs to know what the company thinks of them
Example
1 = Needs significant improvement2 = Needs some improvement3 = Meets expectations4 = Best in class
Things to Avoid
1.Administrative headache2.Burdening the employee3.Burdening the manager4.Going too long between reviews5.Bushwhacking6.One size fits all7.Stack ranking
Suggested Framework
1.Quarterly2.Standardized digital forms3.No more than 3 peer reviews4.Separate compensation and development5.Minimize number of scored attributes. 6-ish6.Reviewer = manager at time of review7.Train everyone first. PLEASE
How Much Time Will This Take?
● Self-reviews: 30 minutes● Peer reviews: 20 minutes● Sub-lead reviews: 30 minutes● PL review using all of the above data: 45 minutes● Face-to-face meeting with team member: 30 minutes
Project Lead Alejandra has 12 team members and she is asked to provide a peer review of another PL. During this month she is likely to invest:● Self-review: 30 minutes● Peer review: 20 minutes● Writing reviews for each team member: 12 * 45
minutes = 9 hours● Face-to-face review meetings: 12 * 30 minutes = 6
hours● Total: ~16 hours