Top Banner
PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle, Washington This work was supported in part by the DoD Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) program administered by the Office of Naval Research Under Grant N00014-01-10745.
17

PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

Dec 20, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS

Jeff Baars

Cliff Mass

Mark Albright

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

This work was supported in part by the DoD Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) program administered by the Office of Naval Research Under Grant

N00014-01-10745.

Page 2: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

The point of it all…

Vislocky and Fritsch (1997), using 1990-1992 data, saw that an average of 2 or more MOS’s (CMOS) outperformed individual MOS’s and many human forecasters in a forecasting competition.How has the story changed since then?And how well do CMOS, MOS & the NWS perform during extreme conditions? In different seasons? In different regions?

Page 3: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

Data

July 1 2003 – Jan 1 2004 (6 months).30 stations, all at major WFO sites.Maximum and minimum temperature, and POP.

Page 4: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

Data (con’t)Consensus MOS (CMOS)– simply an average of 4 MOS’s: AMOS, EMOS, MMOS, NMOS.12Z-issued forecast from NWS matched against previous 00Z forecast from models.

NWS has 00Z model data available, and has added advantage of watching conditions develop since 00Z.Models of course can’t look at NWS, but NWS looks at models.

Forecasts going out 48 (60) hours, so in the analysis there are:

Two maximum temperatures (MAX-T),Two minimum temperatures (MIN-T), and Four 12-hr POP forecasts.

Page 5: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

Data (con’t)NWS MOS definition for MAX-T and MIN-T and for POP.Observed precipitation data converted to binary rain/no-rain data for Brier Score calculations.

Page 6: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

Maximum and Minimum Temperature

Page 7: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

Total MAE for the 6 forecasts

Maximum temperature

Minimum temperature

Page 8: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

MAE, temperature, by forecast period

Page 9: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

Bias Time Series, all stations

Page 10: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

MAE, Maximum temperature period 1, by station

WestMtnWest

South-west

EastSouth Mid-

west

Page 11: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

MAE by forecast period, large departure from climatology

Page 12: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

Probability of Precipitation

Page 13: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

Total Brier Score for all 6 forecasts

Page 14: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

Brier Scores by forecast period

Page 15: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

Brier Scores by forecast period, large departure from climatology

Page 16: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

ConclusionCMOS shows equal or superior forecast skill compared to NWS and individual MOS’s when all time periods are considered.

True for max and min temperatures and POPs.

The NWS forecasts show superior forecast skill for max. temperatures during large departures from climatology.http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~jbaars/mos_vs_nws.html

Page 17: PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,

Future WorkSimple weighting correction to CMOS.Remove worst model from CMOS.