Page 1
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
www.eppic.biz
to protect and improve the enterprise
Performance-Based Performance-Based
Curriculum Architecture DesignCurriculum Architecture Design
Concurrent SessionConcurrent SessionISPI 2006 Spring ConferenceISPI 2006 Spring Conference
DallasDallas
Guy W. Wallace, CPTGuy W. Wallace, CPT
Page 2
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 2
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
Session Administrative Session Administrative OpenOpen
This session will provide an overview of a Curriculum Architecture Design (CAD) project’s
four Phases teams and their roles tools and techniques used by the analysts and designer key outputs
The session will also include a small group exercise to create a CAD, using both performance model and enabling knowledge/skill data, in the development of a single T&D path.
Terminal Performance Objectives
Participants will be able to: Describe the “needs met and benefits” of a CAD effort
and the utility of its deliverables Describe the teams’ roles, the tools and techniques
used, and the outputs of a CAD effort Facilitate a team in the design steps using analysis data
Page 3
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 3
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
Session MapSession Map
1. Session Open and Kick-off
1. Session Open and Kick-off
2. Performance-based CAD Process –
Introduction & Orientation
2. Performance-based CAD Process –
Introduction & Orientation
3. Establish the Path, and placing the AoPs, ETA, and the “gapped” enabling K/S data
3. Establish the Path, and placing the AoPs, ETA, and the “gapped” enabling K/S data
4. Creating Module and Event Specs, and cleaning up the Path
4. Creating Module and Event Specs, and cleaning up the Path
5. Session Summary and Close
5. Session Summary and Close
= Application Exercises
Page 4
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 4
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
An overview and details on the
PACT Processes for T&D/learning/Knowledge Management…
…Performance Modeling & K/S Analysis
Recipient of ISPI’s 2002 Awards of Excellence in Instructional Communications
Available from Amazon.com
Page 5
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 5
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
Session Participant PollSession Participant Poll
What is the number of ISD/HPT staffnumber of ISD/HPT staff in your ISD/HPT function? Less than 5Less than 5 Between 5 and 10Between 5 and 10 Between 10 and 50Between 10 and 50 Between 50 and 100Between 50 and 100 More than 100More than 100
How many distinct customer segmentsdistinct customer segments does your ISD/HPT function serve?
Only 1Only 1 Between 2 and 5Between 2 and 5 Between 5 and 10Between 5 and 10 Between 10 and 20Between 10 and 20 More than 20More than 20
What, in your ISD/HPT function, is your rolerole?
Leadership Leadership oror Management/Supervisory Management/Supervisory or or Individual ContributorIndividual Contributor
What is your function’s rolerole? HPT HPT and/orand/or ISD ISD
Page 6
3 Levels of
Instructional Systems Design
The PACT Processes
for T&D/Learning/Knowledge Management
Page 7
CADCADCurriculum
Architecture Design
CADCAD is a gated, “systems engineering/architectural” ISD Process for the design of a comprehensive curriculum
MCDMCDModular
Curriculum Developmen
t
MCDMCD is a gated, “new product development” ISD Process, using a modular, platform design approach …more akin to traditional ISD - ADDIE
IADIADInstructional
Activity Developmen
t
IADIAD is a gated, “new product component development” ISD Process, also using a modular, platform design approach
3 Levels of Instructional Systems Design
Page 8
Target Audience data
Performance Models
Enabling K/S Matrices
Existing T&D Assessments
Page 15
CADCAD is a data-driven, systems engineering/ architectual approach to Instructional Design and produces a design for a comprehensive set of curricula.
Typically used for critical, targeted audiences performing in critical, targeted processes.
Produces a T&D Path and Planning Guide for each Target Audience.
Maximizes reuse of all existing T&D, and produces Event/Module Specifications for all gaps in the CAD for prioritization and resourcing follow-on MCD/IAD efforts.
CADCADCurriculum
Architecture Design
Page 16
ImplementationPlanning
Project Planning & Kick-off
Analysis Design
CAD Phase 1
©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace
CAD Phase 2 CAD Phase 3 CAD Phase 4
CADCAD projects use a 4-Phase structure
with 4 project gate review meetings with the Project Steering Team composed of
the ISD-customer,
the ISD-supplier,
and any/all other key enterprise stakeholders.
CADCADCurriculum
Architecture Design
Page 17
Curriculum Architecture DesignCurriculum Architecture Design
CAD CAD Phase 1Phase 1
Gate ReviewGate ReviewPresentationPresentation
CADCADPhase 2Phase 2
Gate ReviewGate ReviewPresentationPresentation
CAD CAD Phase 3Phase 3
Gate ReviewGate ReviewPresentationPresentation
CADCADPhase 4Phase 4
Gate ReviewGate ReviewPresentationPresentation
Key Outputs
Project Teams and Time Burdens
Phases & Gate Reviews
Task/Plan/Schedule Cost/Benefit
CAD CAD ImplementatiImplementati
on Planon Plan
Target Audience Data Performance Model K/S Matrix Existing T&D Assessments
T&D Path T&D Planning Guide T&D Event Specs T&D Module Specs
Gap Priorities Maintenance Priorities Cost Model Priority Cost Forecast
Project Steering
Team
.
CAD CAD Design Design DocumeDocume
ntnt
CAD CAD Analysis Analysis ReportReport
CAD CAD Project Project
PlanPlan
ProjectProject
Steering Steering
TeamTeam
1/2 day
ProjectProject
Steering Steering
TeamTeam
1 day
ProjectProject
Steering Steering
TeamTeam
1 day
ProjectProject
Steering Steering
TeamTeam
1/2 day
AnalysisAnalysis
TeamTeam
2–4 days
DesignDesign
TeamTeam
2–4 days
ImplementatiImplementati
on Planning on Planning
TeamTeam
1–2 days
ImplementationPlanning
Project Planning & Kick-off
Analysis Design
CAD Phase 1 CAD Phase 2 CAD Phase 3 CAD Phase 4
©2002 EPPIC, Inc.
Page 18
The T&D Path presents a “visual” of the performance-based learning continuum
Page 19
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 19
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
1 of 7 T&D Paths for 1 of 7 “Regions” 1 of 7 T&D Paths for 1 of 7 “Regions” from one combined CAD/MCD effort…from one combined CAD/MCD effort…
Page 21
3 series/phases organize the content for “three entry points”
providing planning flexibility for both new and experienced personnel
Page 22
Each gap on a T&D Path is “specified” on a
T&D Event Spec - a macro-level design specification.
Page 23
Each gap on a T&D Path is “specified” on a
T&D Event Spec - a macro-level design specification.
Each gap T&D Event Spec - has one or more mid-level design specification...for the Module level of design
Page 24
CAD gap T&D Module Specs are organized into a 5 Tier Inventory Scheme
Page 25
One CAD ProjectOne CAD Project
ImplementationPlanning
Project Planning & Kick-off
Analysis Design
CAD Phase 1
©2002 EPPIC, Inc.
CAD Phase 2 CAD Phase 3 CAD Phase 4
Page 26
One CAD ProjectOne CAD Project
Leads to Many MCD/IAD ProjectsLeads to Many MCD/IAD Projects
ImplementationPlanning
Project Planning & Kick-off
Analysis Design
CAD Phase 1
©2002 EPPIC, Inc.
CAD Phase 2 CAD Phase 3 CAD Phase 4
Analysis DesignProject
Planning & Kick-off
MCD Phase 1 MCD Phase 2 MCD Phase 3
Revision & Release
MCD Phase 6
Development/Acquisition
Pilot Test
MCD Phase 4 MCD Phase 5
©2002 EPPIC, Inc.
Page 27
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 27
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
PACT Analysis
Target Audience Data
Performance Modeling
Knowledge/Skill Analysis
Existing T&D AssessmentExisting T&D Assessment
PACT Processes for T&DPACT Processes for T&D
Analysis Data for the CAD Analysis Data for the CAD ProcessProcess
Four types of ISD Analysis:
Page 28
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 28
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
CAD Outputs CAD Outputs for the Supply Side for the Supply Side (continued)(continued)
Performance Models and Knowledge/Skill Matrices
The Most Convenient StoresStore Manager
Knowledge/Skill Matrix
Form Design ©2000 CADDI, Inc. 4/00 Page 1
Codes: Link to Area of PerformanceA = Staff Recruiting, Selection,
and TrainingB = Work Scheduling C = Progressive DisciplineD = Store Operations
Link to Area of Performance DepthA/K/S
Knowledge/Skill Category: 1. Company Policies/Procedures
K/S Item A B C D E F G
Select/Train
S/TCriticality
H/M/LVolatility
H/M/LDifficulty
H/M/L
Criticality/Difficulty/VolatilityH = HighM = Medium
L = Low
Depth of CoverageA = AwarenessK = Knowledge
S = Skill
E = Customer ServiceF = Inventory ManagementG = Payroll, Banking, and
Financial Management
•EEO
• Affirmative action
• Vacation and day-off policy
• Discipline policy
• Suspension procedure
• Store hours policy
• Credit card sales procedure
• New hire orientation procedure
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X
X
X
X X X X
X X
X
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
L
M
M
M
H
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
The Most Convenient StoresStore Manager
Knowledge/Skill Matrix
Form Design ©2002 EPPIC, Inc. 4/00 Page 1
Codes: Link to Area of PerformanceA = Staff Recruiting, Selection,
and TrainingB = Work Scheduling C = Progressive DisciplineD = Store Operations
Link to Area of Performance DepthA/K/S
Knowledge/Skill Category: 1. Company Policies/Procedures
K/S Item A B C D E F G
Select/Train
S/TCriticality
H/M/LVolatility
H/M/LDifficulty
H/M/L
Criticality/Difficulty/VolatilityH = HighM = Medium
L = Low
Depth of CoverageA = AwarenessK = Knowledge
S = Skill
E = Customer ServiceF = Inventory ManagementG = Payroll, Banking, and
Financial Management
•EEO
• Affirmative action
• Vacation and day-off policy
• Discipline policy
• Suspension procedure
• Store hours policy
• Credit card sales procedure
• New hire orientation procedure
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X
X
X
X X X X
X X
X
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
L
M
M
M
H
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Form Design ©2002 EPPIC, Inc. 4/00 Page 1
Area of Performance: A. Staff Recruiting, Selection, and Training
• Key Outputs-Measures Key Tasks
Probable GapCause(s)
dEdKdI
Roles/Responsibilities
1 2 3 4
dE= deficiency -EnvironmentdK= deficiency -Knowledge/skilldI= deficiency -Individual attribute/value
Role: 1 = District Manager2 = Store Manager3 = Assistant Manager4 = Clerk
TypicalPerformance Gaps
The Most Convenient StoreStore Manager
Performance Model
•Identify need for additional staff and complete internal paperwork
•Create and place local ads
•Select candidates for interviewing
•Interview and select candidates for offer
•Make hiring offer(s)
•Complete paperwork to fill the position
•New staff hired-Timely-Qualified
•Too few candidates
•Poor choice
•Poor recruiting•Local economy
•Neglect to check references•References do not provide key information
dKdE
dK
dE
. 4/00 Page 1
Area of Performance: A. Staff Recruiting, Selection, and Training
• Key Outputs-Measures Key Tasks
Probable GapCause(s)
dEdKdI
Roles/Responsibilities
1 2 3 4
dE= deficiency -EnvironmentdK= deficiency -Knowledge/skilldI= deficiency -Individual attribute/value
Role: 1 = District Manager2 = Store Manager3 = Assistant Manager4 = Clerk
TypicalPerformance Gaps
The Most Convenient StoreStore Manager
Performance Model
•Identify need for additional staff and complete internal paperwork
•Create and place local ads
•Select candidates for interviewing
•Interview and select candidates for offer
•Make hiring offer(s)
•Complete paperwork to fill the position
•New staff hired-Timely-Qualified
•Too few candidates
•Poor choice
•Poor recruiting•Local economy
•Neglect to check references•References do not provide key information
dKdE
dK
dE
Page 29
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 29
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
Areas of PerformanceAreas of PerformanceTMC Stores
Store ManagerPERFORMANCE MODELAreas of Performance
Staff Recruiting, Selection,
and Training
Staff Recruiting, Selection,
and Training
WorkScheduling
WorkScheduling Progressive
Discipline
ProgressiveDiscipline Store
Operations
StoreOperations Customer
Service
CustomerService
Payroll, Banking,
and Financial
Management
Payroll, Banking,
and Financial
Management
InventoryManagemen
t
InventoryManagemen
t
A. B. C. D. E.
F. G.
Page 30
Form Design ©2002 EPPIC, Inc. 4/02 Page 1
Area of Performance: A. Staff Recruiting, Selection, and Training
• Key Outputs- Measures Key Tasks
Probable GapCause(s)
dEdKdI
Roles/Responsibilities
1 2 3 4
dE = deficiency - EnvironmentdK = deficiency - Knowledge/skilldI =deficiency - Individual attribute/value
Role: 1 = District Manager2 = Store Manager3 = Assistant Manager4 = Clerk
TypicalPerformance Gaps
The Most Convenient StoreStore Manager
Performance Model
• Identify need for additional staff and complete internal paperwork
•Create and place local ads
•Select candidates for interviewing
• Interview and select candidates for offer
•Make hiring offer(s)
•Complete paperwork to fill the position
• New staff hired- Timely- Qualified
•Too few candidates
•Poor choice
•Poor recruiting•Local economy
•Neglect to check references
•References do not provide key information
dKdE
dK
dE
Page 31
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 31
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
Knowledge/Skill Matrices
Category: Records/ReportsCategory: Tools/Equipment
Category: XYZCategory: ABC
* Plus the knowledge/skill of performance outputs and tasks and roles/responsibilities from the Performance Model
1.Company Policies/Procedures/Practices/Guidelines2.Laws, Regulations, Codes, Agreements, and Contracts3.Industry Standards4.Internal Organizations and Resources5.External Organizations and Resources6.Marketplace Knowledge7.Product/Service Knowledge8.Process Knowledge9.Records, Reports, Documents, and Forms10. Materials and Supplies11. Tools/Equipment/Machinery12. Computer Systems/Software/Hardware13. Personal/Interpersonal14. Management/Supervisory15. Business Knowledge and Skills16. Professional/Technical17. Functional Specific
©2002 EPPIC, Inc.
Human Asset RequirementsHuman Asset Requirements Knowledge/Skill Knowledge/Skill Categories*Categories*
Page 32
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 32
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
K/S MatricesK/S Matrices
Link to Area of PerformanceAccount Representative
K/S Category:
K/S Item A B C D E F G
Select/
TrainS/T
Criti-calityH/M/L
Vola-tilityH/M/L
DepthA/K/S
The ABC CompanyAccount RepresentativeKnowledge/Skill Matrix
• International TradeRegulations
• International Tax Laws
• InterstateCommerce
• EEOC
• Fair Employment Laws
• License Fees
• ADA
• Wage/Hour Laws
• OSHA
• Robinson/Patman Act
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
L
L
H
L
L
H
L
L
L
H
A
A
K
A
A
K
A
A
K
K
2. Laws/Regulations/Codes
Diffi-cultyH/M/L
H
H
H
L
L
L
L
H
H
H
2002 EPPIC, Inc.REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED
Territory Planning
Territory Planning
Account Planning
Account Planning
Page 33
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 33
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
Primary Delivery MethodPrimary methods/media used in the training
Special Requirements for DeliveryIdentifies anything about the training that limits its capacity, delivery, location, etc.
ProviderResource responsible for delivery (may be internal or external)
Related Process(es), Areas of Performance, or TasksIdentify job performances addressed by the training (see the Performance Model)
Course Owner/ContactInternal resource for registration and/or information
Enabling Knowledge/Skill ItemsIdentifies supporting knowledge/skill items addressed by the training (see the Knowledge/Skill Matrix)
Use As Is or as SourceIndicates initial decision regarding use of this training in the Development/Acquisition Phase
©2002 EPPIC, Inc.
TMC Stores
Number: Title: Provider:
Course Description
Primary Delivery Method:
GP –Group-pacedClassroomLab
1-1 –One-on-oneS-OJT (training)U-OJT
SP –Self-pacedReadings/ExercisesWeb Site PagesCBTVideotape
Other
Special Requirements for Delivery
EquipmentFacilityInstructorLicense RequirementOther
Yes No
Course Fit Assessment
Related Process(es), Area(s) of Performance, orTasks
Include as Is Use as Source:
Materials Attached (e.g., course description)
Do not use
Continued on Side Two
Notes:
Enabling Knowledge/Skill Items:
Class Size:
> 2010 –20< 10Other
Depth/Level:
AwarenessKnowledgeSkill (EDP No.______)Current Target Audience:
All engineersOtherOther
Course Owner/Contact:
Copyright Owner:
Licensing Agreement:
Phone:
Length:
Hrs. Pgs
Schedule/Frequency:
Existing T&DAssessment
Form ©2002 EPPIC Inc. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED v.1 4/99 Page 1
TMC Stores
Number: Title: Provider:
Course Description
Primary Delivery Method:
GP –Group-pacedClassroomLab
1-1 –One-on-oneS-OJT (training)U-OJT
SP –Self-pacedReadings/ExercisesWeb Site PagesCBTVideotape
Other
Special Requirements for Delivery
EquipmentFacilityInstructorLicense RequirementOther
Yes No
Course Fit Assessment
Related Process(es), Area(s) of Performance, orTasks
Include as Is Use as Source:
Materials Attached (e.g., course description)
Do not use
Continued on Side Two
Notes:
Enabling Knowledge/Skill Items:
Class Size:
> 2010 –20< 10Other
Depth/Level:
AwarenessKnowledgeSkill (EDP No.______)Current Target Audience:
All engineersOtherOther
Course Owner/Contact:
Copyright Owner:
Licensing Agreement:
Phone:
Length:
Hrs. Pgs
Schedule/Frequency:
Existing T&DAssessment
REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED v.1 4/99 Page 1
Interviewing Skills10342
ETA – Existing T&D ETA – Existing T&D AssessmentAssessment
Page 34
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 34
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
CAD Phase 3CAD Phase 3
Design Sub-PhasesDesign Sub-Phases
In Phase 3: Design, the Design Team meeting is conducted where all of the potential modules of the architecture are identified, classified, and numbered
The team combines these modules into T&D Events and constructs T&D Paths for learners—sequences of events appropriate for target audiences
The results are compiled in a Design Document and formally presented to the Project Steering Team
Project Planning & Kick-off
Analysis DesignDesignImplementation
Planning
CAD Phase 1 CAD Phase 2 CAD Phase 3 CAD Phase 4
©2002 EPPIC, Inc.
3.1Predesign
Planning, DataGathering, and
Preparation
3.2Design Process
andDocumentation
3.3Phase 3 Gate
Review
3.4Phase 3
Completionand Transition
To ImplementationPlanning Phase
From AnalysisPhase
Page 35
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 35
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
Rules/Guidelines of Rules/Guidelines of “Modularity”“Modularity”
A module is a “chunk/configuration” of content. It is as long as necessary, containing either one, or a mix of content items, following the guidelines below.
Put content in separate Modules if it Does not “logically”belong together Has dissimilar drivers and frequency for changes
(volatility) Needs to be shared differently across multiple
audiences A portion could be easily purchased “off the shelf” Is to be delivered using different delivery platforms Spans multiple categories/
subcategories within the T&D Module Inventory Framework
Page 36
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 36
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
CAD Design Steps 1-7CAD Design Steps 1-7
3
BBeginningeginning MMiddleiddle EEndnd
Create Module
s
CAD “Design Arena”
“Place”“Use as is”
GapPerformance T&D Items
Existing T&D
Events/ ModulesModul
e
24
5
GapPerforman
ce
Module
Module
SortK/SM
slip sheets
Place Enabling
K/S
©2002 EPPIC, Inc.
Existing T&D
Events/ Modules
Sort ETAs
“Place” Gap T&D Item Related to
Performance- AoP- Output- Task
Sort PM slip
sheets
1
6
7Path Clean
Up
Create Events
Establish the T&D Path(s) – B-M-E or other path phases and their approximate timing
Page 37
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 37
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
AoP and K/S Slip Sheets AoP and K/S Slip Sheets andand ETAsETAs
TMC Stores
Number: Title: Provider:
Course Description
Primary Delivery Method:
GP –Group-pacedClassroomLab
1-1 –One-on-oneS-OJT (training)U-OJT
SP –Self-pacedReadings/ExercisesWeb Site PagesCBTVideotape
Other
Special Requirements for Delivery
EquipmentFacilityInstructorLicense RequirementOther
Yes No
Course Fit Assessment
Related Process(es), Area(s) of Performance, orTasks
Include as Is Use as Source:
Materials Attached (e.g., course description)
Do not use
Continued on Side Two
Notes:
Enabling Knowledge/Skill Items:
Class Size:
> 2010 –20< 10Other
Depth/Level:
AwarenessKnowledgeSkill (EDP No.______)Current Target Audience:
All engineersOtherOther
Course Owner/Contact:
Copyright Owner:
Licensing Agreement:
Phone:
Length:
Hrs. Pgs
Schedule/Frequency:
Existing T&DAssessment
Form ©2002 EPPIC Inc. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED v.1 4/99 Page 1
TMC Stores
Number: Title: Provider:
Course Description
Primary Delivery Method:
GP –Group-pacedClassroomLab
1-1 –One-on-oneS-OJT (training)U-OJT
SP –Self-pacedReadings/ExercisesWeb Site PagesCBTVideotape
Other
Special Requirements for Delivery
EquipmentFacilityInstructorLicense RequirementOther
Yes No
Course Fit Assessment
Related Process(es), Area(s) of Performance, orTasks
Include as Is Use as Source:
Materials Attached (e.g., course description)
Do not use
Continued on Side Two
Notes:
Enabling Knowledge/Skill Items:
Class Size:
> 2010 –20< 10Other
Depth/Level:
AwarenessKnowledgeSkill (EDP No.______)Current Target Audience:
All engineersOtherOther
Course Owner/Contact:
Copyright Owner:
Licensing Agreement:
Phone:
Length:
Hrs. Pgs
Schedule/Frequency:
Existing T&DAssessment
REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED v.1 4/99 Page 1
Interviewing Skills10342
AoP Slip Sheet
K/S Slip Sheet
One slip sheet per
Performance Model
“row” of an
“Output/Task Cluster
data-set”
One slip sheet per K/S
Matrices “row” of an
“K/S Item data-set”
Page 38
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 38
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
CAD Design Exercise CAD Design Exercise OverviewOverview
Work in teams of 8-12 to quickly simulate “Designing a CAD” using the “data” in the Exercise Materials Handouts.
Obtain one Exercise Data Pack per team
Go to an open area of the room to lay your flip chart paper on the floor
Select someone from your team to be the “lead CAD designer”
Lay down flip chart paper as your “CAD Design Arena”
Follow the 7 Steps of the Design Process, one step at a time, as “remote control” directed by Guy
Select someone from your team to participate in the debriefing
Page 39
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 39
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
CAD Design Exercise CAD Design Exercise DebriefDebrief
Page 40
Curriculum Architecture DesignCurriculum Architecture Design
CAD CAD Phase 1Phase 1
Gate ReviewGate ReviewPresentationPresentation
CADCADPhase 2Phase 2
Gate ReviewGate ReviewPresentationPresentation
CAD CAD Phase 3Phase 3
Gate ReviewGate ReviewPresentationPresentation
CADCADPhase 4Phase 4
Gate ReviewGate ReviewPresentationPresentation
Key Outputs
Project Teams and Time Burdens
Phases & Gate Reviews
Task/Plan/Schedule Cost/Benefit
CAD CAD ImplementatiImplementati
on Planon Plan
Target Audience Data Performance Model K/S Matrix Existing T&D Assessments
T&D Path T&D Planning Guide T&D Event Specs T&D Module Specs
Gap Priorities Maintenance Priorities Cost Model Priority Cost Forecast
Project Steering
Team
.
CAD CAD Design Design DocumeDocume
ntnt
CAD CAD Analysis Analysis ReportReport
CAD CAD Project Project
PlanPlan
ProjectProject
Steering Steering
TeamTeam
1/2 day
ProjectProject
Steering Steering
TeamTeam
1 day
ProjectProject
Steering Steering
TeamTeam
1 day
ProjectProject
Steering Steering
TeamTeam
1/2 day
AnalysisAnalysis
TeamTeam
2–4 days
DesignDesign
TeamTeam
2–4 days
ImplementatiImplementati
on Planning on Planning
TeamTeam
1–2 days
ImplementationPlanning
Project Planning & Kick-off
Analysis Design
CAD Phase 1 CAD Phase 2 CAD Phase 3 CAD Phase 4
©2002 EPPIC, Inc.
Page 41
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 41
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
Project Steering TeamProject Steering Team
Key Team ResponsibilityKey Team ResponsibilityOwn the project and make key decisions at various project
milestones/review points
Key Team RolesKey Team RolesReview/critique and revise the Project Plan
Select candidate members for the Analysis Team
Review/critique the Analysis Report data and preliminary recommendations
Review/critique the CAD documentation
Review/critique the Implementation Plan
MembershipMembershipClient/logical project owner
Business stakeholders representatives who will be impacted by the project and eventual T&D to be developed and deployed
Project Project
Steering Steering
TeamTeam
3 days
Project Project
Steering Steering
TeamTeam
3 days
Page 42
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 42
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
Analysis Team(s)Analysis Team(s) Analysis Analysis
TeamTeam
3 days
Analysis Analysis
TeamTeam
3 daysKey Team ResponsibilityKey Team ResponsibilityProvide real-world input regarding the target audience’s expected
performance and the enabling knowledge/skills required
Key Team RolesKey Team RolesIdentify the key outputs/metrics, tasks, and roles/responsibilities of ideal
performance
Identify the typical gaps in performance and likely causes of the gaps
MembershipMembershipMaster Performers *
Subject Matter Experts *
Supervisors/Management
Novice Performers
* Most Critical Members of the Analysis Team
Page 43
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 43
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
Design TeamDesign Team Design Design
TeamTeam
3 days
Design Design
TeamTeam
3 daysKey Team ResponsibilityKey Team ResponsibilityProvide input and feedback during the design of the CAD outputs
Key Team RolesKey Team RolesDefine the individual T&D Modules
Assign each T&D Module to a T&D Module Inventory Framework tier level
Establish prerequisite relationships for the individual T&D Modules/Events
Cluster T&D Modules into T&D Events
Define T&D Paths for the target populations
MembershipMembershipDesign Team members will be recruited from the Analysis Team
Page 44
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 44
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
Implementation Implementation Planning TeamPlanning Team
Key Team ResponsibilityKey Team ResponsibilityEstablish the development (implementation) costs for the priority
T&D Modules and Events
Key Team RolesKey Team RolesPrioritize the T&D Event/Module “gaps”
Determine “Make vs.Buy” per gap
Create an “Development Estimating Cost Table”
MembershipMembershipImplementation Planning Team members can be recruited from the
Project Steering Team and Analysis/Design Team(s), or new project participants (but they will require a thorough briefing of the CAD design)
ImplemenImplemen--
tationtation Planning Planning
TeamTeam
1 day
ImplemenImplemen--
tationtation Planning Planning
TeamTeam
1 day
Page 45
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 45
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
ISD TeamISD Team
Key Team ResponsibilityKey Team ResponsibilityConduct all project “ISD” tasks/processes
Key Team RolesKey Team RolesProject Planner and Manager
Analyst
CAD Designer
MembershipMembershipTrained/certified PACT Practitioners from the T&D organization
Analysis Analysis
TeamTeamISDISD
TeamTeam
Page 46
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 46
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
Session Objectives ReviewSession Objectives Review
Participants will be able to:
Describe the “needs met and benefits” of a CAD effort and the utility of its deliverables
Describe the teams’ roles, the tools and techniques used, and the outputs of a CAD effort
Facilitate a team in the design steps using analysis data
Page 47
ISPI 2006 Spring Conference - Performance-Based Curriculum Architecture Design ©2006 EPPIC, Inc. and Guy W. Wallace All Rights Reserved January 2006 E-04 7-2006 Page 47
EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
EPPIC Inc.EPPIC Inc.Achieve Peak Performance
Additional Additional References/Resources on the References/Resources on the EPPIC Web SiteEPPIC Web Site
EPPI White Paper and Presentation Performance Modeling & Human Asset
Enabler Analysis Lean-ISD via the PACT Processes for
Training & Development Lean-ISD White Paper PACT Facilitation How to Build a Training System That
Won’t Burn Down The Training Factor of the Quality
Equation Technology Transfer Using the PACT
Processes for T&D Balancing Conflicting Stakeholder
Requirements Continuous Improvement and Training Managing Human Assets Using a Group Process to Create Models
and Matrices
see Resources Tab at
www.eppic.biz
“Gopher” more at eppic.biz