INTRODUCTION The history of performance appraisal is quite brief. It roots in the early 20 th Century can be traced to Taylor’s pioneering Time and motion studies. But this is not very helpful, for the same may be said about almost everything in the field of modern human resources management. As a distinct and formal management procedure used in the evaluation of work performance, appraisal really dates from the time of the second world war not more than 60 years ago. Performance appraisal system began as simple methods of income justification. That is, appraisal was used to decide whether or not the salary or wage of an individual employee was justified. The process was firmly linked to material outcomes. If an employee’s performance was found to be less than “deal, a cut in pay would follow on the other hand, if their performance was better than the superior expected, a pay rise was in orders. Little consideration, if any, was given to the developmental possibilities of appraisal. It was felt that a cut in pay, or rise, should provide the only required impetus 1
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
INTRODUCTION
The history of performance appraisal is quite brief. It roots in the early 20th Century
can be traced to Taylor’s pioneering Time and motion studies. But this is not very helpful,
for the same may be said about almost everything in the field of modern human resources
management.
As a distinct and formal management procedure used in the evaluation of work
performance, appraisal really dates from the time of the second world war not more than 60
years ago.
Performance appraisal system began as simple methods of income justification. That
is, appraisal was used to decide whether or not the salary or wage of an individual employee
was justified.
The process was firmly linked to material outcomes. If an employee’s performance
was found to be less than “deal, a cut in pay would follow on the other hand, if their
performance was better than the superior expected, a pay rise was in orders.
Little consideration, if any, was given to the developmental possibilities of appraisal.
It was felt that a cut in pay, or rise, should provide the only required impetus for an employee
to either improve or continue to perform well. Sometimes this basic system succeeded in
getting the results that were intended, but more often than not, it failed.
For example, early motivational researchers were aware that different people with
roughly equal work abilities could be paid the same amount of money and yet have quite 1
Indirectly, to help determine reward out comes. That is, the appraisal results are used
to identify the better performing employees who should bet the majority of available merit
pay increases, bonuses, and promotions.
At the other extreme, there are many strong advocates of performance appraisal.
Some view it as potentiality “….. The most crucial aspect of organizational life”.
1
On the other hand, there is a strong rival argument which claims that performance
appraisal must unequivocally be linked to reward outcomes.
Performance appraisal systems began as simple methods of income justification. That
is, appraisal was used to decline whether or not the salary or wage of an individual employee
was justified.
The process was firmly linked to material outcomes. If an employee’s performance
was found to be less than ideal, a cut in pay would follow on the other hand, if their
performance was better than the supervisor expected, a pay rise was in order.
In many organizations - but not all – appraisal results are used, either directly or
indirectly, to help determine reward outcomes. That is, the appraisal results are used to
identify the better performing employees who should get the majority of available merit pay
increases, bonuses, and promotions.
MEANING:-
Performance appraisal is a method of evaluating the behaviour of employees in the
work sport, normally including both the quantitative aspects of job performance.
Performance here refers to the degree of accomplishment of the tasks that make up an
individual’s Job. It indicates how well an individual is fulfilling the job demands. Often the
term is confused with effort, but performance is always measured in terms of results and not
efforts.
Definitions:-
“Managers often believe that the most significant P/HR outcomes involve the
contributions employers make to the organization’s goal attainment. These contributions are
called employee performance, meaning how effectively employees carryout their job
responsibility - Herbert G Heneman
2
“Performance appraisal has many facts. It is an exercise in observation and judgment.
It is a feedback process, and it is an organizational interventions. It is a measurement
process as well as an intensely emotional process. Above all, it is an inexact, human process.
While it is fairly easy to prescribe how the process should work, descriptions of how it
actually works in practice are rather discouraging”.
- Wayne Cascio
“Performance appraisal is the process of evaluating the performance and
qualifications of the employees in terms of the requirements of the Job for which he is
employed for purposes of administration including placement, selection for promotions,
providing financial rewards and other actions which require differential treatment among the
members of a group as distinguished from actions affecting all members equally”.
- Heyel.
NEED FOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:-
• They provide systematic judgments to backup Salary increases, transfers, demotions
or terminations.
• Provide information about the performance ranks basing on which decision regarding
salary fixation, confirmation, promotions, transfer and demotion are taken.
• They are means of telling a subordinate how he is doing and suggesting needed
changes in his behaviour attitude, stills, or job knowledge. They let him know where
he stands with the boss.
• The superior uses them as a base for coaching and counselling the individual.
3
PURPOSE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:-
Performance appraisal aims at attaining the different purposes. They are:
• To create and maintain a satisfactory leave of performance.
• To contribute to the employee growth and development though training and
development.
• To help the superior to have a proper understanding about their subordinates.
• To facilitate fair and equitable compensation based on performance.
• To facilitate for testing and validating selection tests, interview techniques through
comparing their scores with performance appraisal ranks.
• To provide information for making decisions regarding layoff, retrenchment etc.
• To ensure organizational electiveness through correcting employee for standard and
improved performance, and suggesting the change in employee behaviour.
IMPORTANCE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
• Provide information about the performance ranks basing on which decision regarding
salary fixation, confirmation, promotion, transfer and demotion are taken.
• Provide feedback information about the level of achievement and behaviour of
subordinates, rectifying performance deficiencies and to set new standards of work if
necessary.
• Provide information which helps to counsel the subordinate.
• Provide information to diagnosed deficiency in employee regarding skill, knowledge,
determine training and developmental needs and to prescribe the means for employee
growth provides information for correcting placement.
• To prevent grievance and disciplinary activities.
4
ROLE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN EFFECTIVE HRM:
Appraising the performance of individuals, groups and organizations is a common
practice performance appraisal is a method of evaluating the behaviour of employees in the
work spot, normally including both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of Job
performance. Performance is normally appraised by the superiors, but recently, peers,
subordinates and customers. Appraisal methods include both quantitative and qualitative.
Employee should be counselled after the appraisal of the performance in order to develop the
performance further.
OBJECTIVES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:-
• To enable an organization to maintain an inventory of the number and quality
of all managers and to identity and meet their training needs and aspirations.
• To determine increments rewards, and provide a reliable index for promotions
and transfers to positions of greater responsibility.
• To maintain individual and group development needs and to evaluate
effectiveness of training and development programs.
• To plan career development human resources planning based on potentialities.
5
FUNCTIONS OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:-
Levinson has given their functions of performance appraisal.
• It selects to provide an adequate feed back to each individual for his or her
performance.
• It purposes to serve as basis for improving or changing behaviour towards some more
effective working habits.
• It aims at providing data to managers with which they may judge future job
assignments and compensation. He stresses the fact that the existing systems of
performance appraisal don’t serve any of these functions effectively but focuses on
outcome of behaviour.
FEATURES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:-
• Performance appraisal is the systematic description of an employee’s job relevant
strength and weaknesses.
• To find out how well the employee is performing the Job and establish a plan of
improvement.
• Appraisal is arranged periodically according to definite plan.
• Performance appraisal is not Job evaluation, performance appraisal refers to how well
someone is doing the assigned job.
• Performance appraisal is continuous process in every large scale organization.
6
CONTENTS WHICH AREA USED TO MEASURE THE
PERFORMANCE OF AN EMPLOYEE:-
• Regularity of Attendance.
• Self expression; written and oral.
• Ability to work with others.
• Leadership styles and abilities.
• Initiative.
• Technical skills.
• Technical ability / Knowledge.
• Ability to grasp new things.
• Ability to reason.
• Originality and Resourcefulness.
• Creative Skills.
• Area of Interest.
• Area of Suitability.
• Judgment skills.
• Integrity.
• Capability for assuring Responsibility.
• Level of acceptance by subordinates.
• Honesty and sincerity.
• Thoroughness in Job and organizational knowledge.
• Knowledge of systems and procedures.
• Quality of suggestion offered of improvement.
7
When to Appraise?
Informal appraisals are conducted whenever the supervisor or personnel managers
feel it necessary. However, systematic appraisals are conducted on a regular basis, say for
example, every six months
THE EVALUATION PROCESS:-
Stole observes that “The p
rocess of performance appraisal follows a set pattern, viz., a man’s performance is
periodically appraised by his superiors”.
“Usually, the resulting plan is then reviewed of a higher echelon of management, was
it may be challenge, changed or added to, but of the discussion and debate emerges a
development plan tailored to the individual’s unique needs.
ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
COMMUNICATE PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS TO EMPLOYEES
MEASURE ACTUAL PERFORMANCE
COMPARE ACTUAL PERFORMANCE WITH STANDARDS
DISCUSS THE APPRAISAL WITH THE EMPLOYEE
IF NECESSARY, INITIATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
METHODS/ TECHNIQUES OF PERFORMANCE
8
APPRAISAL:
Several methods and techniques of appraisal are available for measurement of the
performance of an employee.
METHODS OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Traditional methods Modern Methods
TRADITIONAL METHODS:-
STRAIGHT RANKING METHOD :-
It is the oldest a simplest method of performance appraisal, by which the man and his
performance are considered as an entity by the rates. No attempt is made to fractionalize the
rate or his performance, the “whole man” is compared with the “whole man” i.e. the ranking
of a man in a work group is done against that of another. This is the simplest method of
separating the most efficient from the least efficient, and relatively easy to develop and use.
MAN TO MAN COMPARISON METHOD:
This technique was used but the USA army during the First World War. By this
method certain factory are selected for the purpose of analysis (such as leadership,
dependability and initiative), and a scale is designed but the rates for each factor. A scale of
man is also created for each selected factor. The each man to be rated is compared with the
man in the scale and certain scores for each factor are awarded to him.
GRADING METHOD:
9
Under this system, the ratter considers certain features and marks them accordingly to
a scale certain categories of worth are first established and carefully detained. The selected
features may be analytical ability, cooperativeness, dependability, self-expression, job
knowledge, judgment, leadership and organizing ability, etc. They may be a) Outstanding, B)
Very good, C) Good or average, D) Fair.
GRAPHIC OR LINEAR RATING SCALE:
This is the most commonly used method of performance appraisal under it, a printed
form, one for each person to be rated.
Accordingly to Juices, these factors are: employee characteristics and employee
contribution. In employee characteristics are included such qualities as initiative, leadership,
co-cooperativeness, dependability, industry, attitude, enthusiasm, loyalty, creative ability etc.
The rating scale method is easy to understand and easy to use, and permits a statically
tabulation of scores. A ready comparison of score among the employee is possible. These
scores indicate the worth of every individual it is the most common evaluation tool in use
today.
FORCED CHOICE DESCRIPTION METHOD:-
This method was evolved after a great deal of research conducted for the military
services during world War-II. It attempts to correct a rates tendency to give consistently high
or consistently low ratings to all the employees.
The use of this method calls for objective reporting and minimum subjective
judgment. Under this method, the rating elements are several sets of pair phrases or
adjectives relating to Job proficiency or personal qualifications.
FORCED DISTRIBUTION METHOD:-
10
Joseph Tiffin evolved this method after statistical work. This system is used to
eliminate or minimize rates bias, so that all personnel may not be placed at the higher and or
at the lower end of the scale. It requires the rates to appraise an employee according to a pre-
determine distribution scale.
The good point of this system is that by forcing the distribution in this manner, the
problem of different appraisers using different parts of the scale is avoided. The method is
highly simple to understand and very easy to apply in organizations.
CHECK LIST:
Under this method, the rate does not evaluate employee performance, he supplies
reports about it and final rating is done but the personnel department. A series of questions
are presented concerning an employee to his behaviour. The rates, then, check to indicate if
the answer to a question about an employee is positive or negative.
FREE ESSAY METHOD:
Under this method, the supervisor makes a free form, open-ended appraisal of an
employee in his own words and puts down his impression about the employee. He takes not
of these factors.
• Relations with fellow supervisors and personnel assigned to him.
• General organization and planning ability.
• Job knowledge and potential.
• Employee characteristics and attitude.
There are several advantages of this method. An essay can provide a deal of
information, especially if the supervisor is asked for instance, to give two or three
11
examples of each judgment he makes. The explanations will give specific information
about the employee, and can reveal even more about the supervisor.
CRITICAL INCIDENT METHOD:
This method was developed following research conducted by the armed forces in the
United States during World War-II.
The basis of this method is the principle that “There are certain significant acts in
each employee behaviour and performance which make all the difference between success
and failure on the job.
This performance appraisal method provides an objective basis for conducting a
discussion of an individual’s performance.
GROUP APPRAISAL METHOD:
Under this method, an appraisal group rates employees, consisting of their supervisor
and three or four other supervisors who have some knowledge of their performance. The
supervisor explains to the group the nature of his subordinates duties.
The group then discusses the standards of performance for that Job, the actual
performance of the Job holders, and the causes of their particular level of performance and
offers suggestion for future improvement if any.
The advantage of this method is that it is through, very simple and is devoid of any
basis, for it involves multiple Judges. But it is very time counselling.
FIELD REVIEW METHOD:-
12
Under this method, a trainer employees from the personnel department interviews line
supervisors to evaluate their respective subordinate. The appraiser is fully equipped with
definite test questions, usually memorized in advance, which puts to the supervisor.
This system is useful for a large organization and does not suffer from the
weaknesses, which are evident in other systems. The main defect is that it keeps two
management representatives busy with the appraisal.
CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS:-
Assessing the employee’s performance confidentially is a traditional method of
performance. Under this method, superior appraises the performance of his subordinates
based on his observations, Judgment and intuitions. The superior keeps his judgment and
reports confidentially. In other wards the superior does not allow the employee to know the
report and his performance. Superior writes the report about his subordinates strengths,
weakness, intelligence, attitude to work, sincerity, commitment, punctuality, attendance,
character, conduct, friendliness etc. This method suffers from a number of limitations.
MODERN METHODS:-
BEHAVIOURALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALE (BARS):-
The behaviourally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) method combines elements of the
traditional rating scales and critical incident methods. Using BARS, Job behaviours from
critical incidents effective and ineffective behaviours are described more objectively. The
method employees’ individuals who are familiar with a particular job to identity its major
components.
ASSESSMNT CENTERS:-
13
This method of appraising was first applied in German Army in 1930. Latter business
and industrial houses started using this method.
Under this method, many evaluators join together to Judge Employee performance in
several situations with the use of a variety of criteria. It is used mostly to help select
employees for the first level (The lowest) supervisory positions. Assessments are made to
determine employee potential for purposes of promotion.
HUMAN RESOURCE ACCOUNTING:-
Human resource accounting deals with cost of and contribution of human resources to
the organization cost of the employee includes cost of man power, planning, recruitment,
selection, induction, placement, training, development, wages and benefits etc.
This technique has not developed and still it is in the transition stage.
MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES (MBO):-
Peter F Ducker’s has evolved this method. MBO is potentially a powerful philosophy
of managing and an effective way for operational sing the evaluation process. If was
described only recently as the ‘larger range’ in performance appraisal.
Management by objectives can be describes as “a process where by the superior and
subordinate manages of an organization jointly identify its common goals, define each
individuals major areas of responsibility in terms of results expected of him and use these
measures as guides for operating the unit and assessing the contributions of each of its
members”.
360 DEGREE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:-
14
The appraisal may be any person who has through knowledge about the Job alone by
contents to be appraised, standards of contents and who observes the employee while
performing a Job. The appraiser should be capable of determining what is more important
and what is relatively less important. He should asses the performance without bias. The
Appraisers are supervisors, peers, subordinates employees themselves users of service and
consultants. Performance Appraisal by all these parties is called “3600 performance
appraisal”.
15
INTRODUCTION
This chapter outlines the need, importance and scope of the study. Also the chapter
speaks about various objectives of the study. The chapter enlightens the methodology
adopted by the researcher in sampling and sample design, data collection methods and
tools used in data analysis and interpretation.
NEED FOR THE STUDY
• Provide information about the performance ranks basing on which decision regarding
salary fixation, confirmation, promotion, transfer and demotion are taken.
• Provide feedback information about the level of achievement and behaviour of
subordinate. This information helps to review the performance of the subordinate,
rectifying performance deficiencies and to set new standards of work if necessary.
• Provide information which helps to council the subordinate.
• Provide information to diagnosed deficiency in employee regarding skill, knowledge,
determine training and developmental needs and to prescribe the mean for employee
growth provides information for correcting placement.
• To prevent grievances and in disciplinary activities.
16
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY:
It will help to find out the performance appraisal techniques which are used in
Organization
It improves the efficiency of an organization
It helps in knowing the opinion of the employees about performance appraisal
It provide information which helps to council the sub-ordinates
It prevent grievances and in-discipline
It provide information which helps in reviewing the performance of sub-ordinates
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY:
The major objectives of the present study are performance appraisal under taken by HETERO
DRUGS LTD.,
• The primary objective of performance appraisal is to help each man handle his current
job better.
• To find out the performance appraisal techniques which are used in the organization
• New employees are evaluated as a measure to recruit them as well as determined their
initial wage rates.
• Existing employees are evaluated with a view to ascertaining lay-off, transfers,