PepsiCo Research & Development Facility Expansion Project

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

PepsiCo Research & Development Facility Expansion Project

350 Columbus Avenue and 100 East Stevens Avenue Valhalla, NY 10595

TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK

Date: January 2017

VO

LU

ME

II

APPENDICES A. All SEQRA documentation, including:

1. Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Part 12. Positive Declaration3. Scoping Outline

B. CorrespondenceC. Geotechnical Data (Memoranda from Carlin Simpson & Associates, dated 06/23/2015

and 11/23/2015)D. Natural Resource Data

1. Wetland Delineation Report (Evans Associates Environmental Consultants, dated 5/24/2016)

2. National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Mapping (October 2016)3. NY Natural Heritage Program Documentation (Evans Associates

Environmental Consultants, dated 09/02/2016)4. Tree Survey Data

E. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (JMC, dated 12/15/2016) [Refer to VOLUME II.E]F. Traffic Impact Study (Maser Consulting, dated 12/09/2016)G. Preliminary Assessment / Disturbance Memorandum (Historical Perspectives,

Inc., dated November 2016)H. NYSDEC Air Facility Registration Certificate I. Valhalla Fire Department Parcel Documentation

APPENDIX A

SEQR DOCUMENTATION

1. Full Environmental Assessment Form (Part 1)

2. Notice of Intent to Serve as Lead Agency

3. Confirmation of Lead Agency, Positive Declaration

and Notice of Public Scoping Session

4. DEIS Scoping Outline

Page 1 of 13

Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting

Instructions for Completing Part 1

Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification.

Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary toupdate or fully develop that information.

Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question thatmust be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete.

A. Project and Sponsor Information.

Name of Action or Project:

Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map):

Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need):

Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone:

E-Mail:

Address:

City/PO: State: Zip Code:

Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone:

E-Mail:

Address:


Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: E-Mail:

Address:


PepsiCo R&D Facility Expansion

Located west of Columbus Avenue & South, Southwest of Stevens Avenue (100 East Stevens Avenue, Westchester; 89/112.19-1-7).

PepsiCo Valhalla R & D Facility Expansion project consists of expansion and improvements to the existing, PepsiCo Research and Development (R&D)Facility in Mount Pleasant. PepsiCo needs a modern Global Beverage R&D Center to accommodate its current and future needs. In order to do so at theValhalla location, which is strategically located in close proximity to PepsiCo’s World Headquarters in Purchase, NY, the Applicant is now proposing toconstruct a new, attractive approximately 122,000 square-foot, three-story state-of-the-art research and development facility on its existing R&D campus,together with a new parking area, landscaping, storm water management facilities and other associated site improvements. Interior renovations of the twoexisting buildings on the property (including the expansion of the mezzanine level and a vestibule at 350 Columbus Avenue which will add ±15,000 sf offloor area to the existing building) are also proposed in connection with the overall modernization of the Property.In addition, approval of financial assistance in the form of sales and use tax exemptions, and a partial real property tax abatement in the form of a Paymentin Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) Agreement, are also requested from the Town of Mount Pleasant Industrial Development Agency (IDA).

PepsiCo, Inc.914-742-4581

[email protected]

350 Columbus Avenue

Valhalla NY 10595

Mr. John Ellingham, Director, Facilities914-742-4581

[email protected]

350 Columbus Avenue

Valhalla NY 10595

PepsiCo, Inc.Carl Chaleski (914) 253-2372

[email protected]

700 Anderson Hill Road

Purchase NY 10577

Page 2 of 13

B. Government Approvals

B. Government Approvals Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financialassistance.)

Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Required

Application Date (Actual or projected)

a. City Council, Town Board, Yes Noor Village Board of Trustees

b. Town Yes No

c. City Council, Town or Yes No Village Zoning Board of Appeals

d. Other local agencies Yes No

e. County agencies Yes No

f. Regional agencies Yes No

g. State agencies Yes No

h. Federal agencies Yes No

i. Coastal Resources.i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? Yes No

ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? Yes No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? Yes No

C. Planning and Zoning

C.1. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the Yes No only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed?

If Yes, complete sections C, F and G.If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1

C.2. Adopted land use plans.

a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site Yes No where the proposed action would be located?

If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action Yes No would be located? b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway Yes No

Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan;or other?)

If Yes, identify the plan(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, Yes Noor an adopted municipal farmland protection plan?

If Yes, identify the plan(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

✔

✔ Site Plan, Steep Slopes, Stormwater Permit June 2016

✔

✔ Mount Pleasant IDA June 2016

✔ Westchester County Department of Public WorksWestchester County Department of Health

✔ NYCDEP (watershed)

✔ NYSDEC (SWPPP); Empire State DevelopmentCorporation (potential funding source)

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

NYC Watershed Boundary

✔

Page 3 of 13

C.3. Zoning

a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. Yes NoIf Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district?

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? Yes No

c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? Yes No If Yes,

i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________

C.4. Existing community services.

a. In what school district is the project site located? ________________________________________________________________

b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________

c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site?__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

d. What parks serve the project site?____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

D. Project Details

D.1. Proposed and Potential Development

a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include allcomponents)?_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? ____ ____ acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? __________ acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned

or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? _________ acres

c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? Yes No i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units,

square feet)? % ____________________ Units: ____________________d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? Yes No If Yes,

i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? Yes No iii. Number of lots proposed? ________iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________

e. Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? Yes No i. If No, anticipated period of construction: _____ months

ii. If Yes:Total number of phases anticipated _____ Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) _____ month _____ year Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase maydetermine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________

sg p pb. Total acreage to be physically disturbed?

______ ______________ acres

✔

OB-1 (Office-Business)

✔

✔

Valhalla Union Free School District

Mount Pleasant Police Department

Valhalla FD, Valhalla VAC, Valhalla EMS

Kensico Dam Plaza park, Mount Pleasant Pool and recreation area, Pat Henry Field, Cranberry Preserve, Graham Hills Park

35.099.9

35.09

✔

70%/approx. 137,000 sf

✔

✔30

expansion of existing research and development facility on existing suburban office campus.

Page 4 of 13

f. Does the project include new residential uses? Yes No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed.

One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more)

Initial Phase ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ At completion of all phases ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________

g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? Yes No If Yes,

i. Total number of structures __ _________ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height; ________width; and _______ length

iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________ square feet

h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any Yes No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage?

If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ________________________________________________________________________________

ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: Ground water Surface water streams Other specify:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source._________________________________________________________________________________________________________

iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: ____________ million gallons; surface area: ____________ acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ________ height; _______ length

vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete):________________________________________________________________________________________________________

D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? Yes No

(Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavatedmaterials will remain onsite)

If Yes:i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? _______________________________________________________________

ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site?Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________

iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? Yes No If yes, describe. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acresvi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres

vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feetviii. Will the excavation require blasting? Yes No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment Yes No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area?

If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic

description): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

✔

✔

1 primary structure50.52' 115.4 ' 421.9'

approx. 137,000

✔

✔

Building construction, site work

TBDTBD

existing soils at proposed building location.

✔

TBDless than 5 acres

TBD✔

Blasting TBD. Balance cut and fill is desired goal, but earthwork is not complete - TBD.

✔

Page 5 of 13

ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, oralteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres:____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

iii. Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes NoIf Yes, describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________

iv. Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? Yes No If Yes:

a of vegetation proposed to be removed ___________________________________________________________ acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion ________________________________________

purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________

v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? Yes No If Yes:

i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: __________________________ gallons/dayii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? Yes No

If Yes:Name of district or service area: _________________________________________________________________________Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? Yes No Is the project site in the existing district? Yes No Is expansion of the district needed? Yes No Do existing lines serve the project site? Yes No

iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? Yes No If Yes:

Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________

iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? Yes No If, Yes:

Applicant/sponsor for new district: ________________________________________________________________________Date application submitted or anticipated: __________________________________________________________________Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________

v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), maximum pumping capacity: _______ gallons/minute.

d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? Yes No If Yes:

i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: _______________ gallons/dayii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and

approximate volumes or proportions of each): ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? Yes No If Yes:

Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________Name of district: ______________________________________________________________________________________Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? Yes No

Is the project site in the existing district? Yes No Is expansion of the district needed? Yes No

✔

TBD✔

Kensico Water District✔✔

✔✔

✔

✔

✔

TBD

✔

Yonkers Sewage Treatment PlantUpper Bronx

✔✔

✔

Page 6 of 13

Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? Yes No Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? Yes No If Yes:

Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________

iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site? Yes No If Yes:

Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________________Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________

v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge, or describe subsurface disposal plans): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point Yes No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point

source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes:

i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel?_ Square feet or __ __ acres (impervious surface)

_ _ Square feet or acres (parcel size)ii. Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties,

groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? Yes No

iv. Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? Yes No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel Yes No

combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations?If Yes, identify:

i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles)_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers)________________________________________________________________________________________________________

iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation)________________________________________________________________________________________________________

g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit, Yes No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit?

If Yes:i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet Yes No

ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year)ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate:

___________Tons/year ( ) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2)___________Tons/year ( ) of Nitrous Oxide (N2 )___________Tons/year ( ) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)___________Tons/year ( ) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6)___________Tons/year ( ) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflo rocarbons (H )___________Tons/year ( ) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)

35.09

Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit,tt Yes No y (or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit?

If Yes:

, yMobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles)g p j p ( g , y q p , y )_________________________________________________________________________________________________________Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers)____________________________________________________________________________________

y g ( g , p g , g, p , )y g ( g , p g , g, p , )__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

4.5

✔✔

✔

✔

on site stormwater facilities

✔✔

✔

TBD

TBD

Large Boilers- fuel combustion

✔

Page 7 of 13

h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, Yes No landfills, composting facilities)?

If Yes:i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________

ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat orelectricity, flaring): _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as Yes No quarry or landfill operations?

If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________

j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial Yes No new demand for transportation facilities or services?

If Yes:i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): Morning Evening Weekend

Randomly between hours of __________ to ________.ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of semi-trailer truck trips/day: _______________________

iii. Parking spaces: Existing _____________ Proposed ___________ Net increase/decrease _____________iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? Yes No v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads, creation of new roads or change in existing access, describe:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site? Yes No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric Yes No

or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing Yes No

pedestrian or bicycle routes?

k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand Yes No for energy?

If Yes:i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ____________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or

other):________________________________________________________________________________________________________

iii. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade to, an existing substation? Yes No

l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply.i. During Construction: ii. During Operations:

Monday - Friday: _________________________ Monday - Friday: ____________________________Saturday: ________________________________ Saturday: ___________________________________Sunday: _________________________________ Sunday: ____________________________________Holidays: ________________________________ Holidays: ___________________________________

✔

✔

✔

✔ ✔

10-12 per day402 527 125

✔

minor intersection improvements may be required.

✔✔

✔

✔

Grid / Local Utility✔

8AM- 6 PM8AM-5PM

nonenone

same as existing 9AM-6 PMnonenonenone

Page 8 of 13

m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, Yes No operation, or both?

If yes: i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration:

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________

ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? Yes No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________

n.. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? Yes No If yes: i. Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? Yes No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________

o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? Yes No If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ______________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

p. Yes No Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum ( over 1,100 gallons)or chemical products ?

If Yes: i. Product(s) to be stored ______________________________________________________________________________________

ii. Volume(s) ______ per unit time ___________ (e.g., month, year)iii. Generally describe proposed storage facilities ___________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides, Yes No

insecticides) during construction or operation?If Yes:

i. Describe proposed treatment(s):________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? Yes No r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal Yes No

of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)?If Yes:

i. Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility:Construction: ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time)Operation : ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time)

ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste:Construction: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Operation: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site:Construction: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Operation: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

✔

Yes - During construction - typical noise from construction equipment likley.No - during operations - same as existing

✔

✔

TBD

✔

✔

✔

fuel oilTBD

storage tanks(s) - details TBD

✔

During operations, potential for typical landscape maintenance practices for landscaped grounds of facility.

✔✔

750TBD

36 mo.(5 /mo. 4 tons)

typical project goals are 75-80% recycled waste. Single stream recycling or individual container based on material type.

as per current operations.

Trash chutes and buggies used for construction debris removal. Disposed in 30 cy containers.

collection and disposal as per current operations.

Page 9 of 13

s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? Yes No If Yes:

i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, orother disposal activities): ___________________________________________________________________________________

ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing:________ Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or________ Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment

iii. If landfill, anticipated site life: ________________________________ years

t. Will proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous Yes No waste?

If Yes: i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ___________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _____ tons/monthiv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: ____________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? Yes No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action

E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses.

i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. Urban Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) Forest Agriculture Aquatic Other (specify): ____________________________________ ii. If mix of uses, generally describe:

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________

b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site.Land use or Covertype

Current Acreage

Acreage After Project Completion

Change (Acres +/-)

Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervioussurfacesForestedMeadows, grasslands or brushlands (non-agricultural, including abandoned agricultural)Agricultural(includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) Surface water features(lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) Wetlands (freshwater or tidal)Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill)

OtherDescribe: _______________________________ ________________________________________

Acreage After ChangegProject Completion

g(Acres +/-)

Current Acreage

✔

✔

None. All hazardous wastes are sent to hazardous waste facilities, as per existing operations.

✔ ✔✔ ✔ Office Campus

Existing office/laboratory campus contains buildings, parking and multi use athletic field. Surrounding uses include the park, schools, municipalbuildings and single family residential.

9.13 12.2 +3.07

5.78 5.23 -0.55

0 0 0

0 0 0

1.31 1.31 0

5.64 5.64 0

0 0 0

Landscaped areas/lawn 13.23 10.7 -2.53

Page 10 of 13

c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? Yes No i. If Yes: explain: __________________________________________________________________________________________

d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed Yes No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site?

If Yes, i. Identify Facilities:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

e. Does the project site contain an existing dam? Yes No If Yes:

i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment:Dam height: _________________________________ feet Dam length: _________________________________ feet Surface area: _________________________________ acres Volume impounded: _______________________________ gallons OR acre-feet

ii. Dam=s existing hazard classification: _________________________________________________________________________iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection:

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________

f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, Yes No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility?

If Yes:i. Has the facility been formally closed? Yes No

If yes, cite sources/documentation: _______________________________________________________________________ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility:

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin Yes No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste?

If Yes:i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred:

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________

h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any Yes No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site?

If Yes: i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site Yes No

Remediation database? Check all that apply: Yes – Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ Yes – Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ Neither database

ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? Yes No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): ______________________________________________________________________________ iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s):

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________

✔

Multi purpose field on site for PepsiCo employees and community

✔

Valhalla schools immediately adjacent to the south

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

Page 11 of 13

v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? Yes No If yes, DEC site ID number: ____________________________________________________________________________Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ____________________________________Describe any use limitations: ___________________________________________________________________________Describe any engineering controls: _______________________________________________________________________Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? Yes No Explain: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Sitea. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? ________________ feet

b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? Yes No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________%

c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: ___________________________

d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________ feet

e. Drainage status of project site soils: Well Drained: ___ _% of ite Moderately Well Drained: _____% of site Poorly Drained _____% of ite

f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: 0-10%: _____% of site 10-15%: _____% of site 15% or greater: _____% of site

g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? Yes No If Yes, describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

h. Surface water features.i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, Yes No

ponds or lakes)?ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? Yes No

If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i.iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, Yes No

state or local agency?iv. For each identified wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information

Streams: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ Lakes or Ponds: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________Wetlands: Name ____________________________________________ Approximate Size _______________ Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _________________________

v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired Yes No waterbodies?

If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway? Yes No

j. Is the project site in the 100 year Floodplain? Yes No

k. Is the project site in the 500 year Floodplain? Yes No

l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? Yes No If Yes:

i. Name of aquifer: _________________________________________________________________________________________

0-10%: _____% of site 10-15%:

__________% of site

4.5

✔TBD

3.7

✔ 48.1✔ 36.4✔ 15.5

✔ 62✔ 12✔ 22

✔

✔

✔

✔

Unnamed Pond N/A 1.3 ac.Federal Waters, Federal Waters 5.64 ac - May 2016*

*see attached wetland delin. report✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

Page 12 of 13

m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: ______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________

n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? Yes No If Yes:

i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________iii. Extent of community/habitat:

Currently: ______________________ acres Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acresGain or loss (indicate + or -): ______________________ acres

o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as Yes No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species?

p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of Yes Nospecial concern?

q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing? Yes No If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: ___________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to Yes No

Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304?If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: _________________________________________________________________

b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? Yes No i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ___________________________________________________________________________

ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s): _________________________________________________________________________________

c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National Yes No Natural Landmark?

If Yes:i. Nature of the natural landmark: Biological Community Geological Featureii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: ___________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? Yes No If Yes:

i. CEA name: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ii. Basis for designation: _____________________________________________________________________________________

iii. Designating agency and date: ______________________________________________________________________________

Typical SuburbanWildlife and Bird Species

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

Airport 60 Ldn Noise ContourExceptional or unique character

Date:1-31-90, Agency:Westchester County

✔

EAF Mapper Summary Report Friday, June 24, 2016 11:00 AM

Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations.

B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] No

B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] No

C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Yes - Digital mapping data are not available for all Special Planning Districts. Refer to EAF Workbook.

C.2.b. [Special Planning District - Name] NYC Watershed Boundary

E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site -Potential Contamination History]

Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook.

E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site -Listed]


E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site -Environmental Site Remediation Database]


E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC RemediationSite]

No

E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] No

E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features] Yes

E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] Yes

E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook.

E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - WetlandsName]

Federal Waters

E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies] No

E.2.i. [Floodway] No

E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] No

E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] No

E.2.l. [Aquifers] No

E.2.n. [Natural Communities] No

1Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report

E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] No

E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No

E.3.a. [Agricultural District] No

E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] No

E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] Yes

E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area - Name] Airport 60 Ldn Noise Contour

E.3.d.ii [Critical Environmental Area - Reason]

Exceptional or unique character

E.3.d.iii [Critical Environmental Area – Date and Agency]

Date:1-31-90, Agency:Westchester County

E.3.e. [National Register of Historic Places] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook.

E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] No

E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] No

2Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report

FIGURE: SLM-1

DATE: 06/24/2016

350 COLUMBUS AVENUE

SITE LOCATION MAPVALHALLA, NY 10595

SCALE: 1"=1000'

JMC PROJECT: 16077

PEPSICO R&D FACILITY EXPANSION

COPYRIGHT © 2016 by JMC All Rights Reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,without the prior written permission of JMC PLANNING, ENGINEERING, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & LAND SURVEYING, PLLC | JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS, LLC | JOHN MEYER CONSULTING, INC. (JMC). Anymodifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable.

120 BEDFORD RDARMONKNY 10504

(914) 273-5225fax 273-2102

JMCPLLC.COM

sneff

Text Box

See Appendix D

PepsiCo R & D Facility Expansion

Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester County, NY

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Outline

10-17-2016

This document identifies the issues to be addressed in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the expansion of the PepsiCo Research and Development (R&D) Facility in Valhalla, Town of Mount Pleasant, NY. The DEIS will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of 6 NYCRR Part 617.9, to assess the potentially significant adverse environmental impacts of the Proposed Action, and shall address all of the issues included in this scoping outline.

Lead Agency: Town of Mount Pleasant Planning Board

Mount Pleasant Town Hall

One Town Hall Plaza

Valhalla, New York 10595

Contact: Mr. Michael McLaughlin, Planning Board Chairman, (914)742-2327

Scoping Session: October 6, 2016

Scoping Comments Due: October 17, 2016

Site Location: 350 Columbus Ave & 100 East Stevens Ave, Valhalla, NY 10595

Tax Map Section 112.19/Block1/Lot 7

Applicant: PepsiCo, Inc. 350 Columbus Ave, Valhalla, NY 10595

Owner: PepsiCo, Inc. 700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, NY 10577

Proposed Action: The Proposed Action includes expansion and improvements to the existing PepsiCo Research and Development (R&D) Facility in Mount Pleasant. PepsiCo needs a modern Global Beverage R&D Center to accommodate its current and future needs. In order to do so at the Valhalla location, which is strategically located in close proximity to PepsiCo’s World Headquarters in Purchase, NY, the Applicant is now proposing to construct a new, attractive approximately 122,000 square-foot, three-story state-of-the-art research and development facility on its existing R&D campus, together with a new parking area, landscaping, storm water management facilities and other associated site improvements. Interior renovations of the two existing buildings

PepsiCo R&D Expansion - DEIS Scoping Outline 10/17/16

2

on the property (including the expansion of the mezzanine level and a vestibule at 350 Columbus Avenue which will add ±15,000 sf of floor area to the existing building) are also proposed in

connection with the overall modernization of the Property.

CONTENTS OF THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

GENERAL GUIDELINES:

The DEIS will discuss relevant and material facts and evaluate the reasonable alternatives to the Proposed Action identified in this Scoping Outline. It will be clearly and concisely written in language that can be easily read and understood by the public. Highly technical material will be summarized and, if it must be included in its entirety, will be referenced in the DEIS and included as an appendix. In addition, all relevant project correspondence from Involved and Interested Agencies will be included in an appendix to the DEIS.

Narrative discussions will be accompanied to the greatest extent possible by illustrative tables and figures. Each potential impact category (such as land use, traffic, and vegetation, visual) will be the subject of a separate section describing Existing Conditions, Anticipated Impacts, and Proposed Mitigation.

The full DEIS will be made available to the Lead Agency in both hard copy and electronic formats (Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) file). When the DEIS is accepted for public review by the Lead Agency, sufficient hard copies will be provided to allow placement of a copy at the Mount Pleasant library and Town Planning Department for public review during normal business hours. In addition, the full DEIS will be posted on the internet for public review as required by law.

INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL:

A. Cover Sheet. The DEIS shall be preceded by a cover sheet that identifies the following:

• The name, location and tax map designation of the Proposed Action.

• Mount Pleasant Planning Board as the Lead Agency for the project and contact information.

• The name and address of the Applicant, and the name and telephone number of a contact person representing the Applicant.

• The name and address of the primary preparer(s) of the DEIS and the name and telephone number of a contact person representing the preparer(s).

• Date of submission of the DEIS, and date of acceptance of the DEIS [Note: Specific calendar date for acceptance to be inserted].


3

• Deadline by which comments on the DEIS are due [Note: Specific calendar date to be inserted].

B. List of Consultants Involved With the Project. The names, addresses and project responsibilities of all consultants involved with the project shall be listed.

C. Table of Contents. All headings which appear in the text shall be presented in the Table of Contents along with the corresponding page numbers. In addition, the Table of Contents shall include a list of exhibits, list of tables, and list of appendix items, with reference to a listing of additional DEIS volumes, if any.

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The DEIS executive summary shall include the following:

A. Summary description of the Proposed Action, including purpose and need for the project.

B. Brief listing of the anticipated impacts and proposed mitigation measures for each impact issue discussed in the DEIS. The presentation format shall be simple and concise.

C. Brief description of the project alternatives considered in the DEIS.

D. List of Involved and Interested Agencies and required approvals/permits.

II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION

A. Introduction

The introduction shall include the following:

1. Site location 2. Site acreage, tax map designations and ownership 3. Existing zoning designation 4. Development history of the site, including prior uses.

B. Description of Proposed Action

The detailed description of the Proposed Action shall include the following:

1. Summary of existing site conditions, including existing uses, access, circulation, buildings, parking, recreation facilities and other built improvements.


4

2. Summary of natural features on site, including environmental constraints (such as steep slopes, rock outcrops, wetland and wetland buffer areas, etc.). Include brief description of overall drainage areas and relationship to NYCDEP watershed.

3. Summary of Zoning

4. Summary of existing R&D campus, including description of existing circulation,

parking and access; and existing buildings, with operations in each, including labs and research activities. Identify number of employees, hours of operation. Identify frequency of special or non-routine activities that occur at the site. Identify operational issues unique to this R&D facility such as disposal of wastes, chemical hazards, special storage requirements, etc.

5. Description of proposed project components, as shown on the Preliminary Plans, including:

a. Proposed new structures and relationship to existing facility, proposed expansion and new uses. Include areas of new spaces (square footage) and overview of building architecture. Provide preliminary floor plans. b. Access, vehicular circulation, parking and loading, as well as pedestrian circulation and sidewalks. Address pedestrian connections to off-site sidewalks, bus stops and other pedestrian routes. c. Describe green technologies and/or energy efficient aspects of the project. Describe measures and features of Proposed Action that will utilize Green Building Technologies and increase energy efficiency and other measures that address carbon emissions. Describe conservation measures and features that address waste and energy consumption.

6. Summary of proposed improvements to water supply, sanitary sewage, stormwater management and other utilities.

7. Project Purpose, Need and Benefits

a. Description of purpose and need for the expansion project and objectives of the applicant. Identify relationship of this site to the Purchase Headquarters site.

b. Description of the history of this research campus, including the approved Master Plan for Site (1977).

c. Description of benefits of the proposed expansion project, including benefits to the Town.

8. Project Approvals and Reviews

a. Listing of all required approvals and reviews.


5

b. Listing of Involved and Interested Agencies.

III. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, ANTICIPATED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION A. Land Use and Zoning

1. Existing Conditions a. Describe existing land uses and zoning designations on the subject site. b. Describe existing land uses and zoning designations surrounding the site

(within 1/4 mile). c. Describe relevant planning studies, including Westchester 2025, the Mount

Pleasant Comprehensive Plan, Mount Pleasant Hazard Management Plan and Stormwater Plan.

d. Describe PepsiCo’s previous Master Plan for site (1977). 2. Anticipated Impacts

a. Describe potential impacts of the Proposed Action in relation to existing land uses on-site and surrounding land uses (within 1/4 mile of the site).

b. Describe potential impacts of the Proposed Action relative to zoning and compliance with zoning standards, including building setbacks, height, parking and loading, and site coverage standards.

c. Describe compliance with all relevant planning studies (listed above) including the Mount Pleasant Comprehensive Plan, Westchester 2025, and The Bronx River Watershed Management Plan.

d. Describe project relative to 1977 PepsiCo Master Plan. 3. Mitigation Measures

a. Describe site design, layout and configuration as a mitigation measure as well as buffering, if any, to adjacent uses.

B. Geology and Soils

1. Existing Conditions a. Describe regional and site bedrock geology. b. Identify and list soil types on the site, with discussion of soil characteristics

and suitability for construction. Provide a soils map for the site.

2. Anticipated Impacts

a. Provide preliminary grading plan with a limit of disturbance line.

b. Identify and analyze the amount and location of earthwork anticipated (preliminary cut and fill analysis).

c. Describe potential for rock removal including blasting, and potential impacts.


6

d. Address archeological impacts of soil disturbance, if any. Consult with State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) if necessary to determine these impacts.

3. Mitigation Measures

a. Provide a preliminary sediment and erosion control plan.

b. Provide description of components of a rock removal plan, identify if blasting is anticipated, and if so, include how the impacts of blasting would be mitigated.

C. Topography and Slopes

1. Existing Conditions

a. Describe topography on site.

b. Describe existing slopes including categories of 0-15%, 15-25%, and 25% and greater. Provide slope map illustrating these categories.

2. Anticipated Impacts

a. Identify, quantify and map potential impacts to steep slopes (25% and greater) based on the limit of disturbance line.

b. Describe compliance with steep slopes permit standards as per Chapter 180 (Steep Slope Protection) of the Mount Pleasant Town Code.


a. Describe site design layout and configuration, erosion and sediment control measures proposed to minimize steep slope impacts, including slope stabilization.

D. Vegetation and Wildlife 1. Existing Conditions

a. Describe existing vegetative communities on the site. b. Provide a survey of trees in the developed portion of the Site (roughly west

of the existing wetland buffer line), as required by Chapter 201, Trees, of the Mount Pleasant Town Code, including specimen trees, protected trees and specimen tree stands. Provide statement of condition of surveyed trees by an Arborist.

c. List any rare, threatened or endangered species on the site (if any). Reference NYSDEC, New York State Natural Heritage Program (NYNHP) and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).

2. Anticipated Impacts a. Describe potential impacts to vegetative communities and wildlife habitat.


7

b. Describe anticipated tree removal and the Mount Pleasant tree removal permit regulations (Chapter 201, Trees, of the Mount Pleasant Town Code).

c. Describe potential significant adverse impacts to existing wildlife species (if any).

3. Mitigation Measures a. Describe proposed Tree Protection and Reforestation Plan for the site, as

well as other landscaping proposed to mitigate potential impacts including the use of native vegetation to increase habitat values impacted by tree removal and loss of open space as a result of the additional building footprint, parking spaces and other additional impervious surfaces.

b. Describe wildlife mitigation measures, if necessary.

E. Wetlands 1. Existing Conditions

a. Describe and quantify regulated wetland areas or regulated wetland adjacent areas on the site as per Chapter 111, Freshwater Wetlands, of the Mount Pleasant Town Code.

b. Describe National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) wetlands in the project area. 2. Anticipated Impacts

a. Describe and quantify areas in regulated wetlands and adjacent areas to be disturbed based on the limit of disturbance line. Describe potential significant adverse impacts to wetlands.

b. Describe regulated activities and permits required for wetland and/or adjacent area disturbance on the site.

3. Mitigation Measures a. Describe mitigation proposed for wetland impacts, if any.

F. Stormwater Management 1. Existing Conditions

a. Identify and describe existing drainage patterns on the site and within surrounding off-site areas located within the same drainage basin(s) (include map).

b. Calculate and describe the pre-development peak runoff rates for the 1-, 10-, and 100-year storm events.

c. Describe and map Mount Pleasant, NYCDEP, NYSDEC and USACOE regulated existing surface water bodies, intermittent and perennial streams; and 100-year floodplains on the site, and immediately surrounding the site.

d. Identify and describe existing surface water quality conditions on the site. e. Describe existing point and non-point sources of pollution on the site.

2. Anticipated Impacts a. Identify changes in existing drainage patterns and discharge points.


8

b. Calculate and describe the post-development peak run-off rates for the 1-, 10- and 100-year storm events.

c. Calculate the total impervious areas for the site. d. Prepare preliminary stormwater quality calculations to satisfy the

requirements of NYCDEP and NYSDEC. e. Identify direct and indirect disturbance to surface waters, watercourses and

100-year floodplain. f. Identify Federal, State and local permits that will be required for any

watercourse impact, including an analysis of the effects of site development on the hydrology of on and off-site wetlands and watercourses.

3. Mitigation Measures a. Include a preliminary Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)

which supports the approvals requested. b. Address design layout that considers groundwater recharge through the

use of Low Impact Development (LID) stormwater management systems including landscaping, pervious material, curbing designs and other measures to address on–site infiltration and minimize runoff off-site as outlined in the SPDES General Permit.

G. Utilities 1. Water Supply

a. Existing Conditions • Identify public water supply system in the vicinity of the site including

interconnections with adjacent sites and associated easements. • Identify location of existing water main(s) serving the site and point(s)

of connection. • Identify water supply and available capacity.

b. Anticipated Impacts • Provide average daily water demand for all new potential water uses for

the expansion project, as compared to existing uses. • Evaluate capacity of the water district and describe proposed water

connection. • Determine modifications required to water main connections to

adjacent site and streets from the subject property and associated easements, if required.

• Identify provisions for fire protection. c. Mitigation Measures

2. Sanitary Sewer

a. Existing Conditions


9

• Identify existing wastewater treatment facilities to be used and describe its ability to accept additional sanitary waste from the project.

• Identify existing service lines and downstream sewer district mains. b. Anticipated Impacts

• Provide anticipated wastewater generation for the proposed expansion compared to existing uses.

• Describe capacity of the existing sanitary sewer district and describe proposed wastewater treatment connections.

c. Mitigation Measures

3. Other Utilities (Cable Television, Electricity, Natural Gas Internet, Telephone) a. Existing Conditions b. Anticipated Impacts c. Mitigation Measures

H. Traffic and Transportation

1. Existing Conditions

a. Provide a detailed description of roadways in the immediate area, as well as regional access and roadways serving the site. Roadway characteristics will include classifications, general condition, and number and width of lanes by direction, on-street parking, bus stops and traffic control.

b. Existing traffic conditions will be documented for the weekday AM and PM peak hours from historical data and by conducting turning movement manual counts at the following intersections: 1. Columbus Avenue and Town Hall Plaza East/PepsiCo 2. Columbus Avenue and East Stevens Avenue 3. Columbus Avenue and Lozza Drive/ The Summit 4. East Stevens Avenue and Lozza Drive/PepsiCo 5. East Stevens and Lorenz Drive 6. Columbus Avenue and Lakeview Avenue 7. Columbus Avenue and Town Hall Plaza West 8. Columbus Avenue and West Stevens Avenue 9. Columbus Avenue/Kensico Road and Nanny Hagen Road 10. West Stevens Avenue and Commerce Street/Elwood Avenue

Turning movement counts will be collected during typical weekday morning and weekday afternoon peak periods. Data shall not follow or precede holidays and weekday conditions should include dates when schools are in session.

c. Provide Capacity Analysis (Level of Service) for each of the above intersections (SYNCHRO Analysis).

d. Provide parking count for the existing facility on site.


10

e. Describe existing pedestrian circulation; both internal to the site and along public roadway frontages (Columbus Avenue and East Stevens Avenue).

2. Anticipated Impacts a. Provide "No Build" Traffic Volumes/Capacity Analysis, including background

traffic growth and other proposed projects in the area (to be provided by the Town) for the build year 2021.

b. Provide "Build" Traffic Volumes/Capacity Analysis, including anticipated trip generation for the Proposed Action. Estimates of site generated traffic will be based on the driveway counts or based on data from similar facilities as well as on information published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) as contained in their report entitled Trip Generation, 9th Edition, 2012. Arrival and departure distributions will be developed based upon a review of existing traffic volumes on the roadway network. The Site Generated Traffic Volumes will be assigned to the roadway network based on the anticipated arrival and departure distributions. The Site Generated Traffic Volumes will be combined with the No Build Traffic Volumes to obtain the Build Traffic Volumes for each of the peak hours.

c. Analyze and describe sight distances at both site access driveways. d. Provide a parking analysis for proposed facility and expansion project on site. e. Describe potential impacts to existing pedestrian circulation on the Site.

Investigate feasibility or need for sidewalks along public roadway frontage (Columbus Avenue and East Stevens Avenue).

3. Mitigation Measures a. Where the increased traffic has the potential to significantly affect traffic

operations, the traffic study will identify potential mitigation measures to address such conditions. The discussion of mitigation measures will include the following information:

- The types of roadway improvements, including traffic control; - The party responsible for implementing the improvements and the

method of funding. - Potential pedestrian improvements

I. Visual Resources and Community Character

1. Existing Conditions a. Identify and illustrate existing visual conditions on the site and as viewed from

adjacent streets and properties. Include photographs of existing views toward the site from:

• East Stevens Avenue (Minimum of 2 locations) • Columbus Avenue (Minimum of 2 locations) • The eastern Site property line (closest to Lorenz Drive)


11

• The southern Site property line (closest to the Kensico School). 2. Anticipated Impacts

a. Describe anticipated impacts to views to the site from surrounding public roadways and viewpoints. Illustrate proposed conditions as appropriate with visual techniques such as cross sections, perspective views and/or photo simulations.

b. Provide conceptual architectural perspectives for proposed facility expansion and new structure as seen from public roadways.


J. Community Facilities and Services 1. Police

a. Existing Conditions • Identify Police Department staff size and organization. • Identify location of police station that services the Site and average

response time. • Describe access to site and discuss adequacy of access. • Identify existing site security measures

b. Anticipated Impacts • Evaluate increased demand for police services. • Analyze the adequacy of emergency access to site.


2. Fire and EMS a. Existing Conditions

• Identify which Fire District serves the site and indicate the Fire Department’s staff size, organization, apparatus, and number of calls per year.

• Identify location of fire station (adjacent to Site on Columbus Avenue) and average response time.

• Describe access to site and discuss adequacy of access. • Analyze current water supply and capacity for fire-fighting purposes.

b. Anticipated Impacts • Evaluate increased demand for services. • Analyze the adequacy of access to site. • Identify source of water supply and evaluate pressure and required storage

volumes. • Identify any unique fire safety issues related to the R&D operation.


3. Open Space and Recreation


12

a. Existing Conditions – Include description of existing community recreation activities on site.

b. Anticipated Impacts c. Mitigation Measures

4. Solid Waste and Hazardous Waste

a. Existing Conditions • Describe how solid waste and hazardous waste are collected and disposed

of in the existing facility. b. Anticipated Impacts

• Describe how solid waste and hazardous waste will be stored, collected and disposed of for the proposed facility expansion.

c. Mitigation Measures • Include information on the storage of any solid and hazardous waste

including fuel oil and any protective measures to be put in place.

K. Fiscal Impacts 1. Existing Conditions

a. Describe existing demographic characteristics of the Town of Mount Pleasant. b. Identify current taxes generated on the site.

2. Anticipated Impacts a. Project additional/new site population that will occupy the site, compared to

existing. b. Provide analysis of property tax revenue to be generated by the Proposed

Action, including an analysis of any PILOT agreement approved by the Mount Pleasant IDA.

c. Describe specifically any tax revenues to be generated by the Proposed Action to the Valhalla School District.


L. Air Quality and Noise 1. Existing Conditions – describe air quality and noise conditions at site during

existing operations 2. Anticipated Impacts - describe air quality and noise conditions at site with

Proposed Action 3. Mitigation Measures

M. Construction Impacts

1. Potential Impacts a. Describe proposed demolition, construction phasing and overall schedule for

the facility expansion project.


13

b. Identify potential construction traffic, including types of vehicles and route to site.

c. Describe potential temporary impacts to surrounding land uses due to construction activities such as noise, dust or erosion.

d. Describe how new construction will affect existing operations, circulation, parking and employees.

2. Mitigation

IV. ALTERNATIVES For each alternative below (except "No Action") provide a conceptual plan to the level of detail that will enable general comparison to the primary program elements, and general impacts to environmental features, traffic, etc. Provide table which summarizes comparison of Proposed Action to each alternative.

A. No Action (No Build) B. Discuss Alternative Sites C. Alternative Building Location on Site D. Smaller Building on Site

V. OTHER REQUIRED ANALYSES A. Adverse Environmental Impacts Which Cannot be Avoided if the Project is

Implemented B. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources C. Impacts on the Use and Conservation of Energy, including sustainability and green

technology proposed D. Growth Inducing Aspects of Proposed Action. Describe and evaluate any potential that

the Proposed Action may have for triggering further development in terms of attracting similar, additional, or ancillary uses, significant increases in local population, or increasing the demand for support facilities.

E. Cumulative Impacts

VI. APPENDICES A. All SEQRA documentation, including:

a. Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Part 1 b. Positive Declaration c. Scoping Outline

B. Copies of all official correspondence related to issues discussed in the DEIS, and from Involved and Interested Agencies.

C. Natural Resource Data as available, including: 1. Wetland delineation report 2. Tree survey data

D. Geotechnical data


14

E. Stormwater Analysis/Drainage Study (preliminary SWPPP) F. Traffic Impact Study

Attached under separate cover - preliminary engineering plans

f:\2016\16077\seqr\eis scope\pepsi r&d draft deis scope rev10.17.16_redline.docx

APPENDIX B

CORRESPONDENCE

350 COLUMBUS AVE

E STEVENS AVEC

OLU

MBU

S AV

E

W STEVENS AVE

LOZZA DR

TOWNHALLPLZ

LORENZ DR

CO

LUM

BUS

AVE

AERATOR RD

KENSICORESERVOIR

CLO

VEBRO

OK R

D

BRU

CE LN

FOXH

ILL RD

SU

MM

IT LAK

E D

R

HEATH RD

SITE

ZEISS DR

SITE LOCATION

350 COLUMBUS AVE, VALHALLA, NY

SCALE: 1" = 1000'JMC PROJECT: 16077


COPYRIGHT © 2016 by JMC All Rights Reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,without the prior written permission of JMC PLANNING ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & LAND SURVEYING, PLLC | JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS, LLC | JOHN MEYER CONSULTING, INC. (JMC). Anymodifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable.


(914) 273-5225(FAX) 273-2102

JMCPLLC.COM

SOURCE: USGS

FIGURE: II-1

DATE: XX/XX/XXXX

Drawing No:

Project No:

Date:

Scale:

Drawn: Approved:

ANY ALTERATION OF PLANS,SPECIFICATIONS, PLATS ANDREPORTS BEARING THE SEAL

OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER OR LICENSED LANDSURVEYOR IS A VIOLATION OF

SECTION 7209 OF THE NEWYORK STATE EDUCATION LAW,EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR BYSECTION 7209, SUBSECTION 2.

OWNE

R:

APPL

ICAN

T:

No.

Revis

ionDa

te

Prev

ious E

dition

s Obs

olete

By

COPY

RIGH

T ©

2016

by JM

C Al

l Righ

ts Re

serve

d. N

o par

t of th

is do

cume

nt ma

y be r

epro

duce

d, sto

red i

n a re

trieva

l sys

tem, o

r tra

nsmi

tted i

n any

form

or by

mea

ns, e

lectro

nic, m

echa

nical,

photo

copy

ing, r

ecor

ding o

r othe

rwise

, with

out th

e prio

r writt

en pe

rmiss

ion of

JMC

PLAN

NING

, ENG

INEE

RING

, LAN

DSCA

PE A

RCHI

TECT

URE

& LA

ND S

URVE

YING

, PLL

C | J

MC S

ITE

DEVE

LOPM

ENT

CONS

ULTA

NTS,

LLC

| JOH

N ME

YER

CONS

ULTI

NG, IN

C. (J

MC).

Any

mod

ificati

ons o

r alte

ratio

ns to

this

docu

ment

witho

ut the

writt

en pe

rmiss

ion of

JMC

shall

rend

er th

em in

valid

and u

nusa

ble.

PROPOSED R+D BUILDING

O

O

O

O

O

OO

O

O

O

O

OO

O

O

O

O

O O

O

O O

OOO

OO O

O

O

OO

O

OO

O

O

OO

OO

O

O

OO

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

OOO

OOO

O

OO

O

OO

OO

O

O

O O

O

O

O

O

O

OO

OO

O

O

O

O

OO

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

EXISTING BUILDING 350

EXISTIN

G BUILDIN

G 100

350 COLUMBUS AVE

E STEVENS AVEC

OLU

MBU

S AV

E

W STEVENS AVE

LOZZA DR

TOWNHALLPLZ

LORENZ DR

CO

LUM

BUS

AVE

AERATOR RD

KENSICORESERVOIR

CLO

VEBRO

OK R

D

BRU

CE LN

FOXH

ILL RD

SU

MM

IT LAK

E D

R

HEATH RD

SITE

ZEISS DR

SITE LOCATION

350 COLUMBUS AVE, VALHALLA, NY

SCALE: 1" = 1000'JMC PROJECT: 16077


COPYRIGHT © 2016 by JMC All Rights Reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,without the prior written permission of JMC PLANNING ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & LAND SURVEYING, PLLC | JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS, LLC | JOHN MEYER CONSULTING, INC. (JMC). Anymodifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable.


(914) 273-5225(FAX) 273-2102

JMCPLLC.COM

SOURCE: USGS

FIGURE: II-1

DATE: XX/XX/XXXX

Drawing No:

Project No:

Date:

Scale:

Drawn: Approved:




OWNE

R:

APPL

ICAN

T:

No.

Revis

ionDa

te

Prev

ious E

dition

s Obs

olete

By

COPY

RIGH

T ©

2016

by JM

C Al

l Righ

ts Re

serve

d. N

o par

t of th

is do

cume

nt ma

y be r

epro

duce

d, sto

red i

n a re

trieva

l sys

tem, o

r tra

nsmi

tted i

n any

form

or by

mea

ns, e

lectro

nic, m

echa

nical,

photo

copy

ing, r

ecor

ding o

r othe

rwise

, with

out th

e prio

r writt

en pe

rmiss

ion of

JMC

PLAN

NING

, ENG

INEE

RING

, LAN

DSCA

PE A

RCHI

TECT

URE

& LA

ND S

URVE

YING

, PLL

C | J

MC S

ITE

DEVE

LOPM

ENT

CONS

ULTA

NTS,

LLC

| JOH

N ME

YER

CONS

ULTI

NG, IN

C. (J

MC).

Any

mod

ificati

ons o

r alte

ratio

ns to

this

docu

ment

witho

ut the

writt

en pe

rmiss

ion of

JMC

shall

rend

er th

em in

valid

and u

nusa

ble.

PROPOSED R+D BUILDING

O

O

O

O

O

OO

O

O

O

O

OO

O

O

O

O

O O

O

O O

OOO

OO O

O

O

OO

O

OO

O

O

OO

OO

O

O

OO

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

OOO

OOO

O

OO

O

OO

OO

O

O

O O

O

O

O

O

O

OO

OO

O

O

O

O

OO

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

EXISTING BUILDING 350

EXISTIN

G BUILDIN

G 100

APPENDIX C

GEOTECHNICAL DATA

1. Carlin-Simpson & Associates preliminary

memorandum, dated June 23, 2015

2. Carlin-Simpson & Associates supplemental

memorandum, dated November 23, 2015

CARLIN • SIMPSON & ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers

Geotechnical & Environmental

MEMO DATE: 23 June 2015 TO: Mr. Rob Aiello, P.E. FROM: Robert B. Simpson, P.E. JMC Robert H. Barnes P.E. RE: Project Eden JOB NO: 15-37 Pepsi – Valhalla Campus Valhalla, New York We understand that the planned construction will consist of a new four level research/office building. The following is a summary of the preliminary geotechnical design recommendations for the referenced project. During this study, fourteen (14) test borings were performed at the subject site at the locations shown on the attached Boring Location Plan. The boring data is summarized in the following table.

Preliminary Boring Data Boring No. Approximate

Ground Surface

Elevation (Feet)

Depth to Bottom of Existing Fill (Elevation)

Depth to Completely Weathered

Schist (Elevation)

Depth to Auger Refusal of Cored

Schist (Elevation)

B-1 +459.0 1.5’ (+457.5) NE 8.0’ (+451.0) B-2 +452.5 6.0’(+446.5) 6.0’(+446.5) 8.5’ (+444.0) B-3 +447.5 3.0’ (+444.5) 10.0’ (+437.5) 13.0’ (+434.5) B-4 +453.5 NE 3.0’ (+450.5) 10.3’ (+443.2) B-5 +449.5 NE NE 23.0’ (+426.5) B-6 +466.0 NE 3.0’ (+463.0) NE (<+460.3) B-7 +462.0 NE 2.5’ (+459.5) 8.0’ (+454.0) B-8 +451.5 4.5’ (+447.0) 16.5’ (+435.0) 23.0’ (+428.5) B-9 +450.0 4.5’ (+445.5) NE NE (<+428.0) B-10 +448.0 9.5’ (+438.5) NE NE (<+421.0) B-11 +462.0 2.5’ (+459.5) 10.5’ (+451.5) 11.0’ (+451.0) B-12 +433.5 NE 15.5’ (+418.0) NE (<+423.0) B-13 +448.5 NE NE 3.2’ (+445.3) B-14 +449.5 NE NE 2.5’ (+447.0)

NE – Not encountered in boring.

2

Soil and Rock Conditions

- Topsoil - The surface layer in each of the test borings, except for borings B-8 and B-9, is topsoil that is that ranges from 3 to 8 inches in thickness.

- Fill - At the surface in borings B-8 and B-9 and below the topsoil in borings B-1, B-2,

B-3, B-10, and B-11 is existing fill that generally consists of loose to dense brown, gray brown, light red brown, or gray coarse to fine Sand, little to and Silt, little to and coarse to fine Gravel, with several cobbles and boulders. Minor amounts of topsoil were noted within the fill in borings B-9 and B-10. Trace amounts of asphalt debris were also encountered within the fill in boring B-11. Cobbles and boulders were noted within the fill. The existing fill continued to depths ranging from 1’6” to 9’6” below the existing ground surface.

- Silty Sand with Gravel - Underlying the existing fill is medium dense to very dense

brown or gray brown coarse to fine Sand, little to and Silt, trace to and coarse to fine Gravel that transitions to completely weathered schist or schist bedrock. Borings B-1, B-2, B-5, B-9 and B-10 were terminated in this stratum at final depths ranging from 8’0” to 27’0” beneath the existing ground surface.

- Completely Weathered Schist – At several boring locations the natural soils

transition to completely weathered rock in a very dense “soil like” or soft rock state. Completely weathered schist was noted in 8 of the 14 test borings beginning at depths ranging from 2’6” to 16’6” below the ground surface.

- Schist Bedrock – Schist bedrock was cored at borings B-4, B-11, B-13 and B-14 for a

vertical distance of 5 feet. The rock core recoveries ranged from 50 percent at boring B-11 to 100 percent at the other three boring locations. The rock quality designation (RQD) of the recovered cores ranged from 0 percent at boring B-11 to 100 percent. Based on these values, the quality of the upper 5 feet of the bedrock is highly variable ranging from very poor (completely weathered to highly weathered rock) to excellent (intact rock).

Groundwater

- Groundwater was not encountered in any of the fourteen (14) test borings that were performed during this study. These borings extended to depths ranging from 5’8” to 27’0” beneath the existing ground surface.

- Based on the boring data and the proposed site grades, groundwater is not expected to

be encountered during construction. Existing Fill

- Existing fill was encountered in 7 of the 14 test borings and extended to depths ranging from 1’6” to 9’6” beneath the existing ground surface.

- The existing fill observations are summarized in the table above.

3

- The existing fill encountered at this site is not suitable for support of the new building

foundations or floor slab. Based on the proposed floor elevation of +82.88, we expect that most, if not all, of the unsuitable existing fill will be removed during the building excavation.

- In the event that existing fill is present below the planned building subgrade elevation,

it must be completely removed from the new building area. Bedrock

- Schist bedrock ranging from vary dense completely weathered rock to intact bedrock was encountered in several of the borings performed around the planned building area. Based on the boring observations and the proposed building elevations, completely weathered rock to intact bedrock will likely be encountered in the building excavations.

- The rock conditions within the proposed building footprint will be variable. Harder

bedrock may be encountered between boring locations.

- Penetration into the bedrock with excavation equipment will depend of the degree of weathering and fracturing in the rock. The use of hydraulic hammers, and possibly isolated areas of blasting, will be required to excavate the harder, intact bedrock.

New Building Foundations

- The virgin site soils, underlying completely weathered schist and schist bedrock are suitable for supporting the new building foundations.

- New foundations may be designed as spread footing type foundations bearing on

engineer-approved compacted fill, the virgin soil, completely weathered rock, or schist bedrock.

- The following net allowable design bearing pressures may be used:

- New Compacted Fill = 2 TSF - Virgin Soil and Completely Weathered Schist = 3 TSF - Schist Bedrock = 5 TSF

- Minimum depth for frost protection = 42 inches.

Floor Slab

- The virgin site soils, underlying completely weathered schist and schist bedrock, and new compacted fill are suitable for supporting the new floor slab.

4

- The floor slab may be designed as a slab on grade using a Modulus of Subgrade Reaction = 200 pci.

Foundation Wall Design Parameters

- The soil adjacent to the foundation walls will exert a horizontal pressure against the walls. This pressure is based on the soil density and the coefficient of earth pressure at rest (ko) which is applicable to non-yielding foundation walls. We estimate the backfill material will have an in-place density of about 135 pcf and a ko of 0.47. These assumptions result in an equivalent fluid pressure of 63.5 psf/ft against the walls.

- For design, the following values may be used:

a. Angle of internal friction (phi) = 32 degrees b. Coefficient of Earth Pressure at Rest, ko = 0.47 c. Coefficient of Passive Pressure, kp = 3.26 d. Soil/concrete friction factor = 0.45

Site Retaining Wall Design Parameters

a. Angle of internal friction (phi) φ = 32o b. In-place density, γ = 135 pcf c. Coefficient of Active Pressure, Ka = 0.307 d. Equivalent fluid pressure. = 41.5 psf/ft e. Soil/concrete friction factor = 0.45

- The existing fill encountered at this site is not suitable for support of the new retaining

wall in its current state. The retaining wall area shall be excavated to the planned subgrade elevation and the remaining existing fill shall be densified in place under the full-time inspection of Carlin-Simpson & Associates. In the event that soft or unsuitable existing fill is identified during the densification, the unsuitable material shall be removed and replaced with new compacted fill.

- Retaining wall base or footing shall bear on virgin site soils, densified existing fill, or

on Engineer-approved compacted fill.

- Net design bearing pressure = 2.0 TSF

- Minimum depth for frost protection = 42 inches.

- Drain pipes and drainage stone fill must be provided behind the wall for drainage. Seismic

- The new building shall be designed to resist stress produced by lateral forces computed in accordance with the New York State Building Code. The project site can be classified as Site Class C – Very Dense Soil and Soft Rock Profile.

5

Suitability of Site Soils for Use as Compacted Fill

- The existing site soils may be reused as compacted fill provided the soil is free of debris and organic material (i.e. roots, topsoil, etc.) and has not become too wet for proper compaction.

- Topsoil is not suitable for use as compacted fill.

- The silty site soils are sensitive to moisture. Proper moisture conditioning of the site

soils will be required. In the event that the on-site material is too wet at the time of placement and cannot be adequately compacted, the soil should be aerated and allowed to dry or the material removed and a drier fill material used.

- We recommend that adequate site drainage be implemented early in the construction

schedule and if the subgrade becomes wet, the contractor should limit construction activity until the soil has dried.

CARLIN - SIMPSON & ASSOCIATES TEST BORING LOG BORING NUMBERSayreville, NJ B-1

Project: Preliminary/Schematic Study - Pepsi Co., Valhalla, New York SHEET NO.: 1 of 1Client: John Meyer Consulting JOB NUMBER: 15-37Drilling Contractor: General Borings Inc. ELEVATION: +459.5GROUNDWATER CASING SAMPLE CORE TUBE DATUM: Topo DATE TIME DEPTH CASING TYPE HSA SS START DATE: 15 May 15

No Water Encountered DIA. 3 1/4" 1 3/8" FINISH DATE: 15 May 15WGHT 140# DRILLER: T. McGovernFALL 30" INSPECTOR: CKS

Depth (ft.)

Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number

Blows on Sample Spoon per 6" IDENTIFICATION REMARKS

5 Topsoil 0'4"1 S-1 26 FILL (Br cf S, s (+) $, a cf G w/cobbles) Rec = 10"

43 FILL (Brown coarse to fine SAND, 1'6" moist2 12 some (+) Silt and coarse to fine

10 Gravel with cobbles)3 S-2 24 Br gr cf S, s (+) $, a cf G,w/rock fragments Rec = 12"

28 Brown gray coarse to fine SAND, some moist4 56 (+) Silt, and coarse to fine Gravel with Cobbles @ 4'0"

rock fragments5

S-3 23 same Rec = 4"6 50/5" moist

Rock fragment in spoon tip7 Cobbles @ 6'0"

8 8'0" Auger refusal @ 8'0"End of Boring @ 8'0"

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Sym

DRAFT



DIA. 3 1/4" 1 3/8" FINISH DATE: 15 May 15No Water Encountered WGHT 140# DRILLER: T. McGovern

FALL 30" INSPECTOR: CKSDepth

(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


6 Topsoil 0'3"1 S-1 18 FILL (Br cf S, s (-) $, a cf G w/ weathered rock fragments Rec = 10"

30 Large rock outcrop 2 8 near boring location

10 FILL (same) moved hole 5'3 S-2 5 FILL (Brown coarse to fine SAND,

6 some (-) Silt, and coarse to fine Gravel, No recovery4 3 with weathered rock fragments)

4 Fill (same)5 S-3 5 No recovery

36 2 6'0"

S-4 25 Gr br cf S, a (+) $, s cf G w/ weathered rock fragments Rec = 8"7 50/2" moist

Gray brown coarse to fine SAND, and (+) 8 Silt, some coarse to fine Gravel, with Spoon refusal @ 8'2"

weathered rock fragments 8'6" Auger refusal @ 8'6"9 End of Boring @ 8'6"

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Sym

DRAFT





(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


3 Topsoil 0'4"1 S-1 16 FILL (Gr br cf S, l (-) $, a cf G, w/ cobbles) Rec = 18"

20 moist2 16 FILL (Gray brown coarse to fine SAND,

13 little (-) Silt, and coarse to fine Gravel, 3 S-2 11 with cobbles) 3'0" Rec = 15"

30 Gr cf S, a $, l cf G, w/ cobbles moist4 38

58 same, s (+) $

6 S-3 11 Gray coarse to fine SAND, and SILT, Rec = 10"15 little coarse to fine Gravel, with cobbles moist

7 1515 same, s (+) $

8 S-4 14 Rec = 3"12 moist

9 10 cobbles @ 8'0"

10 10'0" Dense drilling 10' - 13'S-5 30/0" completely weathered Schist No recovery

11Completely weathered Schist

12


14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Sym

DRAFT


Project: Preliminary/Schematic Study - Pepsi Co., Valhalla, New York SHEET NO.: 1 of 1Client: John Meyer Consulting JOB NUMBER: 15-37Drilling Contractor: General Borings Inc. ELEVATION: +453.5GROUNDWATER CASING SAMPLE CORE TUBE DATUM: Topo DATE TIME DEPTH CASING TYPE HSA SS NX START DATE: 13 May 15

DIA. 3 1/4" 1 3/8" 3 3/8" FINISH DATE: 15 May 15No Water Encountered WGHT 140# DRILLER: T. McGovern

FALL 30" INSPECTOR: CKS/KWADepth

(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


5 Topsoil 0'6"1 S-1 13 Gr br cf S, s $ Rec = 12"

17 Gray brown coarse to fine SAND, some Silt moist2 16 Augered to refusal @ 10'0"

11 same3 S-2 20 3'0" Rec = 14"

34 moist4 38 Gr br cf S, s $, t cf G (completely weathered schist)

5S-3 50/4" same Rec = 2"

6 moistGray brown coarse to fine SAND,

7 some Silt, trace coarse to fine Gravel(completely weathered Schist)

850/3" same Rec = 2"

9 moist

10 Rec = 3"50/3" same 10'3" moist

11 Run 110'3" - 15'3"

12 Gray, dark gray Schist, Run = 60"Run 1 intact, slightly weathered Rec = 60", 100%

13 RQD = 93%

14

1515'3"

16 End of Boring @ 15'3"

17

18

19

20

21

22

Sym

DRAFT




FALL 30" INSPECTOR: KWADepth

(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


11 Brown Topsoil 0'6"1 S-1 19 FILL (Br cf S, s (-) $, t cf G, w/ boulders) Rec = 13"

5 (Brown coarse to fine SAND, (-) Silt, moist2 5 trace coarse to fine Gravel with boulders)

5 FILL (same)3 S-2 6 3'0" Rec = 18"

9 Br cf S, s $, t f G moist4 9

55 same

6 S-3 6 Rec = 16"9 Brown, gray brown coarse to fine SAND, moist

7 12 some Silt, trace fine Gravel8 same

8 S-4 15 Rec = 17"16 moist

9 23

109 Gr br cf S, s $

11 S-5 12 Rec = 12"21 moist

12 24

13

14

1512 same

16 S-6 16 Rec = 14"24 moist

17 27

18

19

2024 same

21 S-7 25 Rec = 16"36 moist

22 50/3"

Sym

DRAFT


Project: Preliminary/Schematic Study - Pepsi Co., Valhalla, New York SHEET NO.: 2 of 2Client: John Meyer Consulting JOB NUMBER: 15-37Depth

(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


Gray brown coarse to fine SAND, 23 some Silt, trace fine Gravel 23'0" Auger refusal @ 23'0"

End of Boring @ 23'0"24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

Sym





(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


3 Brown Topsoil 0'7"1 S-1 3 Br cf S, s $ Rec = 3"

5 moist2 6 Brown coarse to fine SAND, some Silt

3 same3 S-2 9 3'0" Rec = 3"

17 Gr br cf S, s $, (completley weathered Schist ) moist4 29

Gray brown coarse to fine SAND,5 some Silt, (completely weathered Schist )

S-3 39 same 5'8" Rec = 2"6 50/2" End of Boring 5'8" moist

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Sym

DRAFT





(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


5 Brown Topsoil 0'8"1 S-1 7 Gr br cf S, l $ Rec = 10"

15 moist2 26 Gray brown, coarse to fine SAND, little Silt

18 same 2'6"3 S-2 50 Completely weathered schist Rec = 8"

20/1" moist4

Completely Weathered Schist5

57 same6 S-3 50 Rec = 12"

41 moist7 38


9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Sym

DRAFT





(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


5 FILL (Lt rd br cf S, l $)1 S-1 11 Rec = 12"

17 FILL (Br cf S, l (+) $, t mf G) moist2 18

11 FILL (same)3 S-2 7 FILL (Light red brown, brown coarse Rec = 3"

9 to fine SAND, little Silt, trace moist4 12 medium to fine Gravel) sample off auger flights

4'6"5

8 Gr br cf S, s (-) $, t (-) f G6 S-3 8 Rec = 16"

9 moist7 4

14 same8 S-4 20 Gray brown coarse to fine SAND, Rec = 17"

34 some (-) Silt, trace (-) fine Gravel moist9 34

1030 same

11 S-5 17 Rec = 19"27 Br cf S, l (-) $ moist

12 24

13

14

1511 Gr br cf S, s (-) $

16 S-6 19 Rec = 12"20 16'6" moist

17 61 Gr br cf S, s (-) $ (completely weathered schist)

18

19 Gray brown coarse to fine SAND, some Silt(Completely Weathered Schist)

2050/2" same

21 S-7 Rec = 2"moist

22

Sym

DRAFT



(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


Gray brown coarse to fine SAND, some Silt23 (Completely Weathered Schist) 23'0" Auger refusal @ 23"0"

End of Boring @ 23'0"24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

Sym





(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


6 Topsoil 0'4"1 S-1 20 FILL (Br cf S, l (+) $. s cf G w/ boulders) Rec = 10"

36 FILL (Brown coarse to fine SAND, little (+) moist2 44 Silt, some coarse to fine Gravel, with boulders

6 and topsoil)3 S-2 6 Rec = 18"

7 FILL (same w/ topsoil & roots) moist4 4

4'6"5

4 Br cf S, s (-) $, l (+) cf G6 S-3 8 Rec = 18"

9 moist7 16

19 same8 S-4 19 Rec = 19"

20 moist9 26

108 same, w/ weathered rock

11 S-5 18 Rec = 21"25 moist

12 50/3" dense drilling 11' - 15'Brown coarse to fine SAND, some (-) Cobbles & boulders 12'6" - 15'

13 Silt, little (+) coarse to fine Gravelwith cobbles and boulders

14

1514 same

16 S-6 33 Rec = 20"44 moist

17 52Very dense drilling 15' - 20'

18

19

2019 same

21 S-7 19 Rec = 20"23 very moist

22 31 End of Boring @ 22'0" 22'0"

Sym

DRAFT





(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


4 Topsoil 0'3"1 S-1 9 FILL (Br cf S, l (+) $, l cf G) Rec = 20"

12 moist2 9

5 FILL (Gr cf S, a (+) $, l mf G, w/ topsoil and root fibers)3 S-2 4 Rec = 22'

6 moist4 6 FILL (Brown, gray coarse to fine SAND,

little (+) Silt, little coarse to fine Gravel5 with traces of topsoil)

2 FILL, (same)6 S-3 4 Rec = 18"

3 very moist7 2 possible perched water

2 FILL (same, s (+) $)8 S-4 7 Rec = 17"

10 moist9 17

9'6"10

4 Br cf S, l (+) $, l (-) mf G11 S-5 4 Rec = 19"

6 moist12 12

13Brown coarse to fine SAND, little (+)

14 Silt, little coarse to fine Gravel dense material @ 13'6" - 15'0"with cobbles

1523 same, l cf G w/ cobbles

16 S-6 25 Rec = 17' 28 moist

17 39

18 very dense drilling 15' - 20'

19

2025 same, s (-) cf G, w/cobbles

21 S-7 35 Rec = 18"45 moist

22 53

Sym

DRAFT



(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


23Brown coarse to fine SAND, little

24 Silt, trace coarse to fine Gravel with cobbles

2527 Br cf S, l (-) $, t mf G, w/cobbles


27 32 27'0"End of Boring @ 27'0"

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

Sym





(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


3 Brown Topsoil 0'3"1 S-1 3 Fill (Br cf S, s (+) $, s cf G, w/trace asphalt) Rec = 10"

10 FILL (Brown coarse to fine SAND, moist2 7 some (+) Silt, some coarse to fine Gravel,

7 with trace asphalt) 2'6"3 S-2 10 Br cf S, s $ l cf G Rec = 11"

17 moist4 28 Brown coarse to fine SAND, some

Silt, little coarse to fine Gravel5

15 Br gr cf S, s (-) $, l (-) mf G6 S-3 27 Rec = 16"

31 moist7 36

814 Gr cf S, l $, completely weathered schist

9 S-4 18 Rec = 16"16 moist

10 2421 10'6"

11 S-5 75/4" completely weathered schist Rec = 2"moist

12Run 1

13 Gray Schist, 11'0" - 16'0"Completely to Highly Weathered Run = 60"

14 Run 1 Rec = 30", 50%RQD = 0

15

16 16'0"End of Boring @ 16'0"

17

18

19

20

21

22

Sym

DRAFT





(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


6 Brown Topsoil 0'6"1 S-1 11 Br cf S, s (+) $, s cf G Rec = 8"

51 moist2 53 very dense augering 2' - 4'

Brown coarse to fine SAND, some3 Silt, some coarse to fine Gravel

4 4'0"attempted core 4' - 6'

5 Boulder 5'0" cored through boulder4'-5'

615 Br cf S, l $, t f G

7 S-2 35 Rec = 13"36 moist

8 66

9 Brown coarse to fine SAND, littleSilt, trace fine Gravel

109 same, l (+) $

11 S-3 13 Rec = 19"18 moist

12 24

13

14

1515 same 15'6"

16 S-4 31 Completely weathered Schist Rec = 15"30 moist

17 40 Completely Weathered Schist

1828 same

19 S-5 42 Rec = 16"44 moist

20 49 20'0"End of Boring @ 20'0"

21

22

Sym

DRAFT





(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


3 Topsoil 0'6"1 S-1 6 Br cf S, l (+) $, l cf G Rec = 12"

16 Brown coarse to fine SAND, little (+) moist2 18 Silt, little coarse to fine Gravel

14 same3 S-2 27 Rec = 4"

50/2" 3'2" moist4

Run 15 3'2" - 8'2"

Gray Schist, intact Run = 60"6 Run 1 Rec = 60", 100%

RQD = 100%7

88'2"


10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Sym

DRAFT


Project: Preliminary/Schematic Study- Pepsi Co., Vallhalla, New York SHEET NO.: 1 of 1Client: John Meyer Consulting JOB NUMBER: 15-37Drilling Contractor: General Boring Inc. ELEVATION: +449.5GROUNDWATER CASING SAMPLE CORE TUBE DATUM: Topo DATE TIME DEPTH CASING TYPE HSA SS START DATE: 14 May 15



(ft.)Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number


4 Topsoil 0'5"1 S-1 20 Br cf S, s $, s cf G Rec = 12"

50/3" Brown coarse to fine Sand, some moist2 Silt, some coarse to fine Gravel Auger refusal @ 2'6"

2'6"3 Run 1

2'6" - 7'6"4 Run = 60"

Run 1 Rec = 60", 100%5 Gray Schist, blocky and seamy RQD = 66%

6

77'6"


9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Sym

DRAFT

CARLIN •••• SIMPSON & ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers

Geotechnical & Environmental

MEMO

DATE: 23 November 2015

TO: Mr. Rob Aiello, P.E. FROM: Robert B. Simpson, P.E.

John Meyer Consulting Meredith R. Anke, P.E.

RE: 773 Armonk Road JOB NO: 15-37

New Castle, New York

In accordance with our addendum proposal dated 10 September 2015, we have

performed a supplemental Subsurface Soil and Groundwater Investigation at the referenced

site. We understand that the planned construction will consist of 4 new potential stormwater

management areas.

During this study, nine (9) test borings (BH-2 through BH-10) were performed at the

subject site. (BH-1 was eliminated due to access restrictions) Draft copies of the boring logs

are attached and the locations are shown on the attached Preliminary Boring Location Plan.

The boring observations are summarized in the following table.

Summary of Boring and Test Pit Data

Boring or

Test Pit No.

Approximate

Ground Surface

Elevation (1)

Observed Depth

to Groundwater

(Elevation)

Observed Depth

to Bedrock (Elevation)

BH-1 (eliminated) N/A N/A N/A

BH-2 +446.0 NE to 9’0” NE to 9’0”

BH-3 +446.0 NE to 12’0” NE to 12’0”

BH-4 +447.0 NE to 12’6” 12’6” (+434.5) (2)

BH-5 +446.0 NE to 13’0” NE to 13’0” (3)

BH-6 +447.0 NE to 17’6” NE to 17’0”

BH-7 +449.0 NE to 7’0” NE to 7’0”

BH-8 +439.0 NE to 6’3” 6’3” (+432.75)

BH-9 +442.0 NE to 4’6” 3’6” (+438.5)

BH-10 +441.0 NE to 6’6” 6’6” (+434.5)

(1) – All listed ground surface elevations are preliminary based on the provided topo plan. The

elevations will be updated once the locations have been surveyed.

(2) – Completely weathered Schist in a very dense soil-like state was encountered at this

location.

(3) – Possible boulder or bedrock.

NE – Not encountered to the depth indicated.

In addition, six (6) borehole permeability tests were performed at the subject site. The

test locations and depths are summarized in the following table.

2

Summary of Field Permeability Test Results

Test

No.

Area

No.

Approximate

Ground Surface

Elevation

Test Depth

(Elevation)

Field

Permeability

Rate (*)

BH-1 Area 1 *** *** ***

BH-2 Area 1 +446.0 8’10” (+437.17) 7.0 in/hr

BH-3 Area 2 +446.0 10’3” (+435.75) 1.0 in/hr

BH-4 Area 2 +447.0 10’3” (+436.75) 1.0 in/hr

BH-5 Area 2 +446.0 10’3” (+435.75) 1.0 in/hr

BH-6 Area 2 +447.0 10’9” (+436.25) 1.0 in/hr

BH-7 Area 3 +449.0 5’9” (+443.25) 1.0 in/hr

BH-8 Area 4 +439.0 ** **

BH-9 Area 4 +442.0 ** **

BH-10 Area 4 +441.0 ** **

(*) – The permeability rates shown above do not include a factor of safety.

(**) – No permeability test performed due to shallow bedrock.

(***) – Access restrictions. No testing performed

ROBERT B. SIMPSON, P.E.PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER

1" = 60'SR

FIG - 115-37

24 NOV 15RBS

BOREHOLE PERMEABILITY TESTLOCATION PLAN

PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMPEPSI CO.

VALHALLA, NEW YORK

CARLIN-SIMPSON AND ASSOCIATES61 Main StreetSayreville, NJ 08872

Consulting Geotechnical andEnvironmental Engineers

GENERAL NOTES:

1. GENERAL LAYOUT WAS OBTAINED FROM A DRAWING PREPARED BY JOHNMEYER CONSULTING, ENTITLED "PRELIMINARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENTSYSTEM TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN", DWG NO. 10540-SITE, DATED 09/01/2015.

2. BORING LOCATIONS WERE LAID OUT IN THE FIELD BY CARLIN-SIMPSON &ASSOCIATES (CSA).

3. BORINGS WERE PERFORMED BY GENERAL BORINGS INC. ON 7 AND 8OCTOBER 2015 UNDER THE FULL TIME INSPECTION OF CSA.

4. LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.

LEGEND:

- BOREHOLE PERMEABILITY TEST LOCATION

CARLIN - SIMPSON & ASSOCIATES TEST BORING LOG BORING NUMBERSayreville, NJ BH-2

Project: Preliminary Study-Stormwater Management Area, Pepsi, Vlhalla, NY SHEET NO.: 1 of 1Client: JMC PLLC JOB NUMBER: 15-37Drilling Contractor: General Borings, Inc. ELEVATION: +446.0GROUNDWATER CASING SAMPLE CORE TUBE DATUM: DATE TIME DEPTH CASING TYPE HSA SS START DATE: 08 Oct 15

No water encountered DIA. 1/4" 1 3/8" FINISH DATE: 08 Oct 15WGHT 140# DRILLER: R. PoyntonFALL 30" INSPECTOR: CKS

Depth (ft.)

Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number

Blows on Sample

Spoon per 6"

Sym

IDENTIFICATION REMARKS1 Topsoil 0'3"

1 S-1 8 FILL (Br cf S, a (-) $, l (-) mf G) Rec = 15"5 FILL (Brown coarse to fine Sand, and (-) moist

2 7 Silt, little (-) medium to fine Gravel) 2'0"4 Gr br cf S, s (+) $, a cf G

3 S-2 7 Rec = 14"7 Gray brown coarse to fine Sand, moist

4 8 some (+) Silt, and coarse to fine Gravel

54

6 S-3 9 5'5" Rec = 12"34 Gr cf S, a (+) $, s (+) cf G moist

7 3137 same, w/cobles

8 S-4 30 Gray coarse to fine Sand, and (+) Rec = 13"30 Silt, some (+) coarse to fine Gravel, moist

9 29 with cobbles 9'0"End of Boring @ 9'0"

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DRAFT



No water encountered DIA. 2 1/4" 1 3/8" FINISH DATE: 08 Oct 15WGHT 140# DRILLER: T. McGovernFALL 30" INSPECTOR: KWA

Depth (ft.)

Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number

Blows on Sample

Spoon per 6"

Sym

IDENTIFICATION REMARKS2 FILL (Br cf S, l (+) $, s cf G, w/cobbles)

1 S-1 9 Rec = 17"20 moist

2 126 FILL (Gr cf S, s (+) $, l cf G, w/cobbles)

3 S-2 5 Rec = 12"9 FILL (Gray coarse to fine SAND, moist

4 6 some (+) Silt, little coarse to fine Gravel, with cobbles)

53 FILL (Gr cf S, a $, l mf G)

6 S-3 3 Rec = 16"3 moist

7 2FILL (same, s $)

8 S-4 6 Rec = 18"7 moist

9 3

102 FILL (same)

11 S-5 7 11'0" Rec = 17"12 Br cf S, l $, l cf G moist

12 18 Brown coarse to fine SAND, little 12'0"Silt, little coarse to fine Gravel


14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DRAFT




Depth (ft.)

Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number

Blows on Sample

Spoon per 6"

Sym


1 S-1 10 FILL (Gr cf S, s (+) $, l (-) mf G) Rec = 12"10 moist

2 1111 FILL (same)

3 S-2 5 FILL (Gray coarse to fine SAND, Rec = 13"6 some (+) Silt, little (-) medium to moist

4 4 fine Gravel)

5 2 FILL (same, a (-) $)S-3 2 Rec = 16"

6 2 very moist3

73 FILL (same, s $)

8 S-4 5 Rec = 20"8 moist

9 1111 9'6"

10 S-5 36 Gr cf S, l (+) $, l (+) cf G Rec = 13"30/1" Gray coarse to fine SAND, little (+) moist

11 22 Silt, little (+) coarse to fine Gravel Spoon refusal @ 10'1"15 Auger to 10'6"

12 S-6 15 Gr cf S, l (-) $, l cf G (possible weathered)14 12'6"


14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DRAFT




Depth (ft.)

Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number

Blows on Sample

Spoon per 6"

Sym

IDENTIFICATION REMARKS2 FILL (Br cf S, s $, l (-) f G)

1 S-1 10 Rec = 13"10 moist

2 179 FILL (same, w/wood)

3 S-2 9 Rec = 7"8 FILL (Dark gray coarse to fine SAND, moist

4 6 and (-) SILT)

54 FILL (Dk gr cf S, a (-) $)

6 S-3 4 Rec = 13"6 moist

7 54 Dk gr cf S, t $, w/root, t/brick

8 S-4 12 Rec = 11"30/0" moist

9 boulder 8'-9'

101 FILL (Dk gr cf S, a (-) $)

11 S-5 1 No recovery1

12 1

13 13'0" Auger refusal @ 13'0"End of Boring @ 13'0" possible boulder

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DRAFT



No water encountered DIA. 3 1/4" 1 3/8" FINISH DATE: 08 Oct 15WGHT 140# DRILLER: R. PoyntonFALL 30" INSPECTOR: CKS

Depth (ft.)

Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number

Blows on Sample

Spoon per 6"

Sym


1 S-1 9 FILL (Br gr cf S, s (+) $, l (-) mf G) Rec = 15"8 FILL (Brown gray coarse to fine SAND, moist

2 6 some (+) Silt, little (-) medium to fine 2'0"3 Gravel)

3 S-2 4 FILL (Gr $ a (-), cf S, t (+) mf G, w/trace roots, fibers) Rec = 14"5 very moist

4 12 FILL (Gray SILT and (-), coarse to fineSand, trace (+) medium to fine Gravel,

5 with trace roots and fibers)7 FILL (same, l mf G)

6 S-3 11 Rec = 16"8 moist

7 8 7'0"5 Gr cf S a (-), $, l mf G)

8 S-4 9 Rec = 17"13 moist

9 11

1017 same, w/cobbles

11 S-5 26 No recovery35 Gray coarse to fine Sand, and (-) Silt,

12 50/5" little medium to fine Gravel, with cobbles

13

14

1515 Gr cf S a (-), $, l mf G)

16 S-6 27 No recovery32

17 3217'6" very dense drilling


19

20

21

22

DRAFT




Depth (ft.)

Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number

Blows on Sample

Spoon per 6"

Sym


1 S-1 14 FILL (Br gr cf S, s (-) $, l (-) mf G) Rec = 13"13 FILL (Brown gray coarse to fine SAND, moist

2 5 some (-) Silt, little (-) medium to fine 2'0"3 Gravel)

3 S-2 4 Br cf S, s (+) $, l mf G Rec = 12"3 very moist

4 7 Brown coarse to fine SAND, some (+)Silt, little medium to fine Gravel

56 same


7 24 7'0"End of Boring @ 7'0"

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DRAFT



No water encountered DIA. 3 1/4" 1 3/8" FINISH DATE: 08 Oct 15WGHT 140# DRILLER: T. McGovernFALL 30" INSPECTOR: CKS

Depth (ft.)

Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number

Blows on Sample

Spoon per 6"

Sym


1 S-1 2 Br gr cf G t, cf S, l (+) $ Rec = 15"9 moist

2 50/5"Brown gray coarse to fine GRAVEL

3 trace, coarse to fine Sand, little (+) Silt

4

516 Gr br cf S, s (-) $, Schist, completely weathered

6 S-2 24 Rec = 12"50/5" 6'3" moist

7 End of Boring @ 6'3" Auger refusal @ 6'3"Probable bedrock

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DRAFT



No water encountered HSA DIA. 3 1/4" 1 3/8" FINISH DATE: 07 Oct 15WGHT 140# DRILLER: T.McGovernFALL 30" INSPECTOR: CKS

Depth (ft.)

Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number

Blows on Sample

Spoon per 6"

Sym


1 S-1 3 FILL (Gr br cf S, a $, l (+) mf G) Rec = 12"9 FILL (Gray brown coarse to fine Sand, moist

2 13 and Silt, little (+) medium to fine Gravel)7 2'6"

3 S-2 10 Gr br $ s (+), cf S, l (-) mf G Rec = 13"10 Gray brown SILT some (+), coarse to 3'6" moist

4 70/5" fine Sand, little (-) medium to fineGravel 4'6" Auger refusal @ 6'0"

5 Gray Schist, completely weatheredEnd of Boring @ 4'6"

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DRAFT



No water encountered DIA. 3 1/4" 1 3/8" FINISH DATE: 07 Oct 15WGHT 140# DRILLER: T.McGovernFALL 30" INSPECTOR: CKS

Depth (ft.)

Casing Blows

per Foot

Sample Number

Blows on Sample

Spoon per 6"

Sym


1 S-1 7 FILL (Br gr cf S, a (-) $, l mf G) Rec = 12"10 FILL (Brown gray coarse to fine Sand, moist

2 15 and (-) Silt, little medium to fine Gravel) 2'0"9

3 S-2 15 Gr $ s (+), cf S, l (_) mf G Rec = 15"15 Gray SILT some (+), coarse to fine Sand, moist

4 15 little medium to fine Gravel4'6"

515 Gr br cf S, s $, Schist, completely weathered

6 S-3 22 Gray brown coarse to fine SAND, some Rec = 17"28 Silt, Schist, completely weathered 6'6" moist

7 50/0" End of Boring @ 6'6" Auger refusal @ 6'6"probable bedrock

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DRAFT

APPENDIX D

NATURAL RESOURCE DATA

1. Wetland Delineation Report, dated May 24, 2016,

by Evans Associates Environmental Consulting

2. USFWS National Wetlands Inventory mapping

3. NY Natural Heritage Program Rare Species /

Significant Natural Communities Documentation

4. Tree Inventory / Density Factor calculation

NWI Wetland Types North

Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and theGIS user community

Estuarine and Marine DeepwaterEstuarine and Marine WetlandFreshwater Emergent Wetland

Freshwater Forested/Shrub WetlandFreshwater PondLake

OtherRiverine

October 25, 2016

0 0.025 0.050.0125 mi

0 0.04 0.080.02 km

1:1,605

This page was produced by the NWI mapperNational Wetlands Inventory (NWI)

This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site.

NWI Wetland Types




OtherRiverine

October 25, 2016

0 0.055 0.110.0275 mi

0 0.085 0.170.0425 km

1:3,210



NWI Regional Wetlands




OtherRiverine

October 25, 2016

0 0.2 0.40.1 mi

0 0.35 0.70.175 km

1:12,839



From: dec.sm.NaturalHeritage [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 4:44 PMTo: Eva Szigeti <[email protected]>Subject: RE: Info Request

Dear Ms. Szigeti:

Regarding the expansion of the PepsiCo Research and Development Facility at the Project Edenproperty, 350 Columbus Avenue, Valhalla, in the Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester County, wehave reviewed the New York Natural Heritage Program database. Due to the volume of requests weare receiving, and staff limitations, our turn-around time is currently longer than usual. We regretany inconvenience.

We have no records of rare or state-listed animals or plants, or significant natural communities, atthe project site or in its immediate vicinity.

The absence of data does not necessarily mean that rare or state-listed species, natural communitiesor other significant habitats do not exist on or adjacent to the proposed site. Rather, our filescurrently do not contain information which indicates their presence. For most sites, comprehensivefield surveys have not been conducted. We cannot provide a definitive statement on the presence orabsence of all rare or state-listed species or significant natural communities. Depending on the natureof the project and the conditions at the project site, further information from on-site surveys or otherresources may be required to fully assess impacts on biological resources.

This response applies only to known occurrences of rare or state-listed animals and plants,significant natural communities and other significant habitats maintained in the Natural Heritagedatabase. Your project may require additional review or permits; for information regarding otherpermits that may be required under state law for regulated areas or activities (e.g., regulatedwetlands), please contact the NYS DEC Region 3 Office, Division of Environmental Permits, [email protected], or as listed at www.dec.ny.gov/about/39381.html.

Sincerely,

Nicholas Conrad

mailto:[email protected]






http://www.dec.ny.gov/about/39381.html

Information Resources CoordinatorNew York Natural Heritage ProgramSUNY College of Environmental Science and ForestryIn partnership with NYS Department of Environmental Conservation625 BroadwayAlbany, NY 12233-4757(518) 402-8935www.nynhp.org

From: Eva Szigeti [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 12:14 PMTo: dec.sm.NaturalHeritage <[email protected]>Subject: Info Request Eva Szigeti, CPSSEvans Associates Environmental Consulting, Inc.205 Amity Road, Bethany CT 06524phone: 203 393 0690 fax: 203 393 0196

http://www.nynhp.org/



Tree Reforestation Requirements (§ 201-11)1) Calculate the required density factor for the site (DFS) by multiplying the number of site acres by 15.

DFS = 35.09 Ac x 15 = 526.35

2) Calculate the existing density factor (EDF) of trees which will remain on the site to be protected during construction.

EDF = 534.9

3) Calculate the required replacement density (RDF) (Step 2) from the DFS (Step 1).

RDF = DFS - EDF = n/a (EDF > DFS), therefore DENSITY SATISFIED

Tree Inventory TOTALS 534.9 15 175

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed

8 39 Norway Maple 3 3 Cabled 7.5 Y

11 33 Silver Maple 4 2 Cabled 5.5 Y

14 33 Silver Maple 3 2 Cabled Y X

16 37 Silver Maple 4 2 Broken Cable Y X

18 36 Chamaecyparis Spp. 4 3 Multi-stem Y X

43 44 Pin Oak 5 4 Y X

53 36 Sugar Maple 3 3 7.0 Y

59 33 Sugar Maple 3 3 5.5 Y

60 31 Sugar Maple 2 2 Declining 4.9 Y

94 38 Sugar Maple 3 3 Declining 7.5 Y

128 31 Red Maple 3 3 Y X

186 33 Sugar Maple 4 2 Broken Cable 5.5 Y

350 41 Sugar Maple 2 2 Declining, decay 8.0 Y

391 48 White Oak 3 3 8.0 Y

393 35 Sugar Maple 3 1 Included Bark, Decay, Split Y

1 18 White Pine 3 2 Multi-stem X

2 27 Littleleaf Linden 4 3 3.7

3 19 White Pine 3 3 1.8

4 13 Crab Apple 3 3 X



7 9 Hawthorne 3 2 DEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed

9 18 Norway Maple 3 2 Included Bark, Growing out of tree 10 1.8

10 22 Norway Maple 3 2 Included Bark, Growing out of tree 9 2.6

12 25 Silver Maple 4 2 Cabled 3.1

13 23 Silver Maple 3 2 Cabled X

15 29 Silver Maple 4 2 Cabled X

17 30 Eastern Larch 3 2 Decay, Lightning Scar on Trunk X

19 9 Norway Spruce 4 4 X









28 18 White Pine 3 2 X

29 24 Eastern Larch 4 2 X

30 23 Eastern Larch 4 3 X

31 22 White Fir 4 3 X



34 22 White Pine 4 3 Lighting Scar X

35 25 White Pine 3 2 Decay in large stem X

36 37 White Pine 4 2 Multi-stem X


38 29 Chamaecyparis Spp. 3 3 X








47 26 Chamaecyparis Spp. 3 3 XDEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed




51 36 Sugar Maple 4 3 7.0

52 43 Sugar Maple 3 3 Cabled 8.0

54 41 Sugar Maple 2 3 Declining 8.0

55 18 Sugar Maple 1 1 Dead/Declining




61 15 Black Walnut 3 3 1.1


63 14 Norway Maple 2 2 Declining 1.1

64 15 Shagbark Hickory 4 4 1.1


66 8 Hawthorne 2 3 Canker

67 7 Hawthorne 4 3


69 12 White Pine 4 3 0.8





74 20 Sugar Maple 1 1





79 9 Sugar Maple 2 2 dead top





84 30 Sugar Maple 3 3 4.9DEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed

85 17 Sugar Maple 4 2 Multi-stem 1.4

86 9 Sugar Maple 1 1 dead top/ declining



89 8 Apple 3 2 leaning, covered in vines X

90 8 Sugar Maple 4 2 Cavity X

91 9 Sugar Maple 4 3 X

92 30 Shagbark Hickory 3 2 Multi-stem/Included bark 4.9

93 8 Sugar Maple 3 2 leaning

95 18 Black Cherry 3 2 Significant lean 1.8

96 17 Boxelder Maple 3 1 Significant lean

97 20 Black Locust 3 3 2.2


99 11 Sugar Maple 2 2 No Top, Declining 0.6

100 11 Black Locust 1 1 DEAD

101 19 White Pine 1 3 Dead/Declining X



104 20 Crab Apple 5 1 Multi-stem X

105 24 Boxelder Maple 2 1 Declining X


107 21 Bur Oak 5 5 X





112 29 Bur Oak 5 4 X

113 19 White Pine 2 4 Declining X

114 17 Red Maple 3 3 1.4

115 16 Red Maple 5 4 X


117 20 Sweetgum 4 4 X

118 8 American Dogwood 1 3 Declining

119 10 American Dogwood 1 3 Declining DEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed

120 8 Kwanzan Cherry 1 1 Declining

121 17 Littleleaf Linden 4 3 Included Bark 1.4





126 8 Crab Apple 1 3 Declining


129 18 Sugar Maple 1 3 Dead/Declining X

130 20 Red Maple 4 3 2.2

131 19 White Pine 1 2 Declining


133 14 Red Maple 3 2 Included Bark X



136 8 Crab Apple 3 3






142 17 Littleleaf Linden 1 3 Declining




146 18 Kwanzan Cherry 3 2 1.8

147 18 Kwanzan Cherry 2 1 Declining, Fruting Bodies, Included Bark

148 11 Kwanzan Cherry 1 1 Declining, Fruiting Bodies, Decay

149 15 Sugar Maple 1 1 DEAD X

150 13 Littleleaf Linden 4 5 X


152 17 White Pine 2 4 1.4


154 15 White Pine 3 3 1.1DEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed

155 16 White Pine 4 2 Included Bark X




159 17 Red Maple 2 2 Canker, Decay X

160 16 White Ash 1 2 Multi-stem, Declining

161 21 White Pine 3 3 2.2

162 16 White Pine 3 2 Multi-stem 1.4

163 20 Crab Apple 4 2 Multi-stem 2.2

164 13 White Pine 1 3 Dead/Declining

165 24 White Pine 3 3 3.1

166 21 White Pine 2 3 Declining 2.2

167 20 White Pine 4 2 2.2

168 18 White Pine 3 2 1.8

169 21 White Pine 3 3 2.2




173 16 Crab Apple 3 2 Included Bark 1.4





178 12 Crab Apple 3 2 0.8


180 14 Crab Apple 2 3 Multi-stem, Declining 1.1

181 8 Crab Apple 2 3 Multi-stem, Declining

182 8 Crab Apple 3 3 Multi-stem




187 18 White Pine 2 4 1.8


189 17 White Pine 1 2 Dead/Declining DEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed

190 18 White Pine 3 3 1.8


192 10 White Pine 2 3 0.6

193 10 White Pine 3 3 0.6

194 10 White Pine 2 3 0.6

195 20 White Pine 4 3 2.2

196 29 Norway Maple 1 1 Dead/Declining, Decayed

197 15 White Pine 3 4 1.1

198 10 White Pine 3 3 0.6

199 17 White Pine 4 4 1.4

200 23 White Pine 4 3 2.6

201 19 White Pine 4 2 Large condominant stems 1.8

202 29 Norway Maple 4 2 Included Bark 4.3

203 13 White Pine 4 4 0.8

204 29 Norway Maple 4 2 4.3


206 Clump River Birch 5 3 X





211 8 Hawthorne 2 2 Cavity



214 8 Norway Spruce 4 5





219 22 Weeping Cherry 4 4 X

220 9 Hawthorne 4 2 Cavity X


222 10 Hawthorne 4 2 Included Bark X

223 10 Crab Apple 2 3 XDEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed

224 25 Littleleaf Linden 5 2 Included Bark X








232 10 Crab Apple 4 4 0.6









241 10 Hawthorne 4 3 0.6

242 10 Hawthorne 4 2 0.6

243 18 White Pine 3 3 1.8

244 29 Pin Oak 5 3 4.3

245 23 Black Locust 3 1 Lean, Decay, Cracks in Main Stem

246 23 Black Locust 3 2 Fruiting Bodies/Decay 2.6


248 11 Norway Maple 1 1 DEAD

249 27 Black Locust 3 2 Significant Lean 3.7

250 15 Norway Maple 2 2 Bark Falling off/Decay 1.1


252 21 Black Locust 4 2 No Top 2.2





257 9 Norway Maple 4 4DEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed








265 25 Black Locust 3 3 Fruiting Bodies 3.1



268 16 Norway Maple 3 2 Leaning 1.4


270 20 Black Locust 4 2 Growing out of tree 271 - carpenter ants found 2.2

271 12 Norway Maple 4 2 Growing out of tree 270 0.8



274 21 Norway Maple 3 2 Central leader removed 2.2


276 21 White Pine 3 3 2.2

277 15 Red Maple 5 4 1.1

278 23 Red Maple 4 3 Included Bark 2.6

279 13 Red Maple 4 5 0.8

280 16 London Planetree 5 5 1.4




284 23 Pin Oak 4 4 X


286 27 Pin Oak 4 4 X

287 26 London Planetree 5 5 X

288 27 London Planetree 5 3 X

289 11 Red Maple 1 3 Decay/Declining X


291 8 Crab Apple 3 3 XDEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed



294 21 Pin Oak 4 4 X



297 14 Pin Oak 4 3 X


299 18 Bur Oak 4 3 X


301 12 Sugar Maple 3 3 0.8


303 16 Black Locust 3 3 covered in vines 1.4

304 19 Black Locust 3 2 leaning 1.8





309 16 Apple 3 2 leaning 1.4





314 13 Black Walnut 3 2 leaning 0.8

315 15 Boxelder Maple 2 2 leaning/declining 1.1

316 17 Sugar Maple 4 3 1.4

317 13 Ailanthus 3 3 0.8

318 15 Sugar Maple 3 3 1.1

319 16 Ailanthus 3 3 1.4

320 14 Sugar Maple 4 3 1.1


322 12 Sugar Maple 3 3 0.8

323 13 Boxelder Maple 3 2 Significant lean X

324 17 Sugar Maple 3 2 No Top 1.4

325 18 Ailanthus 3 2 leaning 1.8DEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed

326 23 Sugar Maple 3 2 Cavity 2.6

327 9 Ailanthus 3 2 leaning

328 7 Sugar Maple 3 2 No Top

329 10 Sugar Maple 4 3 0.6

330 15 Ailanthus 4 2 leaning 1.1

331 14 Ailanthus 3 3 covered in vines 1.1

332 14 Ailanthus 3 2 leaning, covered in vines 1.1

333 9 Ailanthus 3 3

334 9 Ailanthus 2 2 Declining

335 10 Ailanthus 2 2 Declining 0.6

336 10 Sugar Maple 4 3 0.6

337 11 Sugar Maple 2 2 Canker 0.6

338 14 Sugar Maple 4 3 1.1



341 20 Sugar Maple 3 2 Multi-stem/Included bark X



344 10 Sugar Maple 3 3 0.6

345 28 Ailanthus 1 1 decayed, cavities, declining

346 12 Ailanthus 3 2 Declining 0.8

347 14 Ailanthus 3 2 1.1

348 14 Ailanthus 3 2 Girdled by vines 1.1






355 20 Ailanthus 3 3 Multi-stem X

356 17 Sugar Maple 3 2 leaning X

357 18 Sugar Maple 1 1 Dead/Declining

358 16 Sugar Maple 4 3 1.4

359 17 Sugar Maple 4 3 1.4

360 14 Sugar Maple 4 3 1.1DEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed

361 21 Black Locust 3 2 Leaning towards road 2.2


363 21 Sugar Maple 3 3 2.2


365 25 Sugar Maple 3 1 Decay

366 18 Sugar Maple 2 2 Girdling root, declining, leaning X

367 14 Ailanthus 3 3 X


369 16 DEAD 0 0 DEAD X

370 15 DEAD 0 0 DEAD X

371 20 Norway Maple 4 4 X

372 14 Boxelder Maple 3 1 Laying on ground X


374 11 Sugar Maple 5 4 0.6


376 10 Black Cherry 1 2 Declining

377 23 DEAD 0 0 DEAD

378 21 Ailanthus 0 0 DEAD

379 16 Sugar Maple 2 2 Declining 1.4

380 10 Black Cherry 2 3 dead top 0.6

381 13 Black Cherry 3 2 0.8

382 16 Sugar Maple 3 3 1.4


384 10 Gray Birch 3 1 Leaning towards road

385 10 Sugar Maple 3 3 0.6

386 16 Red Oak 3 2 Growing into 387 1.4

387 13 Black Locust 3 2 Growing into 386 0.8

388 15 Black Locust 3 1 Leaning towards road


390 19 Black Cherry 3 2 Leaning towards road 1.8

392 25 Black Locust 1 1 DEAD

394 12 Sugar Maple 4 3 0.8

395 16 Black Cherry 2 2 Declining 1.4

396 24 Black Cherry 2 2 Declining 3.1DEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed

397 10 Sugar Maple 5 5 0.6

398 28 Norway Maple 3 2 sections of canopy missing X

399 14 Sugar Maple 3 2 1.1

400 13 Black Locust 3 2 leaning 0.8

401 21 White Pine 3 3 2.2



404 24 White Pine 3 2 Double stem included bark 3.1

405 20 White Pine 3 3 2.2

406 8 American Dogwood 3 3 Double stem

407 19 White Pine 3 1 Leaning - roots lifting

408 30 White Ash 1 2 Dead/Declining

409 13 Black Cherry 1 2 Declining/Leaning

410 18 White Ash 1 2 Declining


412 22 White Pine 4 4 2.6

413 20 Sweetgum 4 4 2.2




417 17 White Pine 3 3 1.4

418 16 Sweetgum 4 4 1.4

419 14 Sweetgum 4 4 1.1

420 18 White Pine 4 3 1.8

422 12 White Pine 3 3 0.8

423 13 Sweetgum 4 3 0.8

424 20 Kwanzan Cherry 3 3 Multi-stem 2.2

425 17 White Pine 4 3 1.4


427 19 White Pine 3 3 1.8

428 28 White Pine 3 2 Included Bark 4.3


430 23 White Pine 3 3 2.6

431 20 White Pine 2 2 Declining 2.2DEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed


433 30 Red Maple 3 1 Multi-stem/Included bark

434 31 Red Maple 3 1 Multi-stem/Included bark

435 20 Red Maple 2 2 Multi-stem/Included bark, declining 2.2

436 23 Shagbark Hickory 5 5 2.6

437 15 White Pine 3 5 1.1

438 14 White Pine 3 4 1.1

439 25 White Pine 4 3 3.1

440 23 White Pine 3 3 2.6

441 24 White Pine 3 2 Multi-stem/Included bark 3.1




445 27 White Pine 3 2 Multi-stem/Included bark 3.7

446 17 White Pine 3 3 1.4

447 20 White Pine 3 3 2.2


449 17 Sweetgum 3 4 girdling roots 1.4

450 21 Sweetgum 4 2 Internal decay - carpenter ants found 2.2


452 25 Sweetgum 4 4 3.1

453 21 White Pine 3 3 2.2


455 14 Hawthorne 3 3 1.1

456 12 Hawthorne 3 2 Cavity 0.8

457 14 Hawthorne 3 2 Cavity X

458 14 Hawthorne 4 3 X

459 8 Hawthorne 3 2 Decay


461 18 White Pine 3 3 1.8

462 19 White Pine 3 3 1.8

463 19 Bur Oak 3 4 1.8

464 19 White Pine 2 2 Broken Top 1.8

465 27 White Pine 1 2 Declining DEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed

466 19 White Pine 3 2 1.8

467 19 White Pine 3 2 1.8

468 19 White Pine 3 3 1.8

469 13 White Pine 3 4 0.8


471 20 Sugar Maple 4 2 Included Bark X






477 25 Sweetgum 4 4 3.1





482 13 Red Maple 3 3 0.8





487 19 White Pine 3 3 1.8

488 26 Sweetgum 4 2 Included Bark 3.7

489 26 White Pine 3 3 3.7

490 26 White Pine 2 2 No Top, Declining 3.7

491 3 Magnolia 4 4 small ornamental

492 4 Kousa Dogwood 4 4 small ornamental

493 10 Crab Apple 3 4 0.6

494 10 Crab Apple 3 3 0.6

495 12 Crab Apple 3 4 0.8

496 13 Crab Apple 3 3 0.8

496 12 Crab Apple 2 3 0.8


498 12 Hawthorne 4 2 Multi-stem 0.8DEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed

499 13 Hawthorne 5 2 Multi-stem 0.8

500 11 Norway Maple 3 2 Cavity 0.6



503 17 Black Locust 2 1 Decayed, leaning



506 19 Black Cherry 1 2 Declining

507 23 Black Locust 1 1 Decaying, Fruiting bodies

508 18 Black Cherry 2 1 leaning/declining



511 25 Black Locust 2 1 Decayed, cracked stem

512 11 Black Locust 1 1 Broken in half

513 9 DEAD 0 0 DEAD

514 19 Sugar Maple 5 3 1.8


516 15 Black Cherry 2 1 Decay, canker

517 12 Black Cherry 1 1 Leaning, canker, declining


519 9 Ailanthus 3 3

520 21 Sugar Maple 4 3 2.2

521 22 Sugar Maple 4 2 Missing portions of canopy 2.6



524 17 Black Locust 3 2 leaning X

525 16 DEAD 0 0 DEAD


527 17 Black Locust 2 1 decay



530 15 Black Cherry 3 2 leaning X

531 22 Black Locust 4 3 X

532 17 Black Cherry 3 3 XDEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed






538 9 Hawthorne 4 3 X




542 26 Pin Oak 4 4 X

543 18 White Pine 2 2 Unbalnced canopy, lean X

544 27 Pin Oak 4 3 Leaning X


















562 20 Black Locust 2 2 Declining 2.2

563 11 Norway Maple 1 1 Decay/Declining

564 10 Norway Maple 4 1 Decay

565 26 Black Locust 3 1 Decay/Leaning

566 22 Black Locust 3 2 2.6DEIS: 10/31/2016

Tree Tag

Number

Diameter at

Breast

Height

(Dbh) in

inches

Species Visual

Health

Rating

Visual

Structure

Rating

NOTES Density

Factor

(units)

Specimen

Tree

Proposed

to be

Removed

567 10 Norway Maple 3 1 Cavity with decay, Leaning

568 8 Norway Maple 3 1 Growing out of tree 566

569 9 Norway Maple 3 2 Significant Lean


571 7 Norway Maple 2 1 Growing out of tree 572

572 16 Norway Maple 3 1 Growing out of tree 571, Included Bark



575 15 Boxelder Maple 2 1 Cracked Stem/Significant Lean


577 28 Black Locust 3 2 Split Trunk and Decay 4.3

578 8 Hawthorne 4 3



581 10 Crab Apple 3 3 0.6

582 11 Norway Maple 3 2 Leaning/Unbalanced 0.6



585 12 Norway Maple 1 1 DEAD





590 9 Norway Maple 4 4





595 9 Norway Maple 4 2 decay



598 10 Black Cherry 2 2 0.6


600 12 Sugar Maple 3 2 0.8DEIS: 10/31/2016

Explanation of Health Rating Visual Health Rating System - The health of each tree was based on a score between 1 & 5 with 5 being the highest score. Scores were based on the following:

1 – Very Poor – Tree exhibits severe dieback of branches, crown is thin, may show extensive pest infestation. Or tree is dead.

2 – Poor – Tree exhibits minor dieback of branches, annual shoot growth is short, slight signs of growth, probable pest infestations.

3 – Fair – Tree is typical for its species found in this area. Crown is full but may show signs of minor dieback

4 – Good – New growth is vigor and has good color (limited to time of year). Crown is full and exhibits vigorous shoot growth.

5 – Very Good – Tree exhibits excellent growth in canopy, foliage, stems and trunk. No signs of pests.

Explanation of Structure Rating Visual Structure Rating System - The Structure of each tree was based on a score between 1 & 5 with 5 being the highest score. Scores were based on the following:

1 – Very Poor – Trunk has cavities, may have multiple stems with included bark, and may have a significant lean.

2 – Poor – Branches have weak attachments to main stem. Crown is out of balance and may have a lean.

3 – Fair – Trunk and branches may have flaws but are typical to this species.

4 – Good – Trunk is straight with branches that exhibit a strong attachment. Branches may have flaws but are not obvious.

5 – Very Good – Tree exhibits good trunk taper and root flare. Has a balanced crown.

APPENDIX E

STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN

(Refer to separate VOLUME II.E)

APPENDIX F

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

1. Traffic Impact Study, dated December 9, 2016,

by Maser Consulting P.A.

New Jersey New York Pennsylvania Virginia

Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction

SITE LOCATION MAP

PepsiCo R+D Facility ExpansionValhalla, New York

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIGURE NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

Consulting, Municipal & Environmental Engineers Planners Surveyors Landscape Architects State of N.Y. Certificate of Authorization: 0008671

AutoCAD SHX Text

15000265A

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/19/2016

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

WESTCHESTER OFFICE 11 Bradhurst Avenue Hawthorne, NY 10532 Phone: 914.347.7500 Fax: 914.347.7266 email: solutions @ maserconsulting.com@ maserconsulting.com maserconsulting.commaserconsulting.com

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOZZA DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

E. STEVENS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LORENZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

MOUNT PLEASANT TOWN HALL

AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN HALL PLAZA

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE SUMMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANNY HAGEN ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAKEVIEW AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELWOOD AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMERCE STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

KENSICO ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE



NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE

2016 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMESWEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR


AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

40

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

130

AutoCAD SHX Text

240

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

93

AutoCAD SHX Text

365

AutoCAD SHX Text

34

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

230

AutoCAD SHX Text

17

AutoCAD SHX Text

74

AutoCAD SHX Text

112

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

46

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

241

AutoCAD SHX Text

43

AutoCAD SHX Text

67

AutoCAD SHX Text

95

AutoCAD SHX Text

52

AutoCAD SHX Text

285

AutoCAD SHX Text

120

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

27

AutoCAD SHX Text

76

AutoCAD SHX Text

435

AutoCAD SHX Text

52

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

179

AutoCAD SHX Text

114

AutoCAD SHX Text

156

AutoCAD SHX Text

137

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

362

AutoCAD SHX Text

33

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

73

AutoCAD SHX Text

65

AutoCAD SHX Text

613

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

186

AutoCAD SHX Text

74

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

32

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

27

AutoCAD SHX Text

101

AutoCAD SHX Text

73

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

231

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

26

AutoCAD SHX Text

34

AutoCAD SHX Text

19

AutoCAD SHX Text

67

AutoCAD SHX Text

30

AutoCAD SHX Text

640

AutoCAD SHX Text

116

AutoCAD SHX Text

262

AutoCAD SHX Text

39

AutoCAD SHX Text

19

AutoCAD SHX Text

546

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIGURE NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

15000265A

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/19/2016

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOZZA DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

E. STEVENS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LORENZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN HALL PLAZA

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE SUMMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANNY HAGEN ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAKEVIEW AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELWOOD AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMERCE STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

KENSICO ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

151

AutoCAD SHX Text

289

AutoCAD SHX Text

239

AutoCAD SHX Text

88

AutoCAD SHX Text

403

AutoCAD SHX Text

670

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

17

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

41

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

92

AutoCAD SHX Text

0




2016 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMESWEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR


AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

61

AutoCAD SHX Text

27

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

24

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

333

AutoCAD SHX Text

14

AutoCAD SHX Text

45

AutoCAD SHX Text

281

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

181

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

50

AutoCAD SHX Text

120

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

37

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

64

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

248

AutoCAD SHX Text

39

AutoCAD SHX Text

33

AutoCAD SHX Text

56

AutoCAD SHX Text

87

AutoCAD SHX Text

284

AutoCAD SHX Text

126

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

91

AutoCAD SHX Text

32

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

440

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

133

AutoCAD SHX Text

202

AutoCAD SHX Text

86

AutoCAD SHX Text

40

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

341

AutoCAD SHX Text

92

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

119

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

504

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

130

AutoCAD SHX Text

151

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

14

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

31

AutoCAD SHX Text

265

AutoCAD SHX Text

70

AutoCAD SHX Text

16

AutoCAD SHX Text

60

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

92

AutoCAD SHX Text

41

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

16

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

525

AutoCAD SHX Text

196

AutoCAD SHX Text

130

AutoCAD SHX Text

48

AutoCAD SHX Text

34

AutoCAD SHX Text

454

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIGURE NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

15000265A

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/19/2016

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOZZA DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

E. STEVENS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LORENZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN HALL PLAZA

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE SUMMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANNY HAGEN ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAKEVIEW AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELWOOD AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMERCE STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

KENSICO ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

92

AutoCAD SHX Text

345

AutoCAD SHX Text

611

AutoCAD SHX Text

127

AutoCAD SHX Text

313

AutoCAD SHX Text

330

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

22

AutoCAD SHX Text

50

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

34

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

51

AutoCAD SHX Text

0




2021 PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMESWEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR


AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

42

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

137

AutoCAD SHX Text

252

AutoCAD SHX Text

26

AutoCAD SHX Text

98

AutoCAD SHX Text

383

AutoCAD SHX Text

36

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

242

AutoCAD SHX Text

18

AutoCAD SHX Text

78

AutoCAD SHX Text

118

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

16

AutoCAD SHX Text

48

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

253

AutoCAD SHX Text

45

AutoCAD SHX Text

70

AutoCAD SHX Text

100

AutoCAD SHX Text

55

AutoCAD SHX Text

299

AutoCAD SHX Text

126

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

22

AutoCAD SHX Text

28

AutoCAD SHX Text

80

AutoCAD SHX Text

457

AutoCAD SHX Text

55

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

188

AutoCAD SHX Text

120

AutoCAD SHX Text

164

AutoCAD SHX Text

144

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

380

AutoCAD SHX Text

35

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

77

AutoCAD SHX Text

68

AutoCAD SHX Text

644

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

195

AutoCAD SHX Text

78

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

34

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

28

AutoCAD SHX Text

106

AutoCAD SHX Text

77

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

243

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

27

AutoCAD SHX Text

36

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

70

AutoCAD SHX Text

32

AutoCAD SHX Text

672

AutoCAD SHX Text

122

AutoCAD SHX Text

275

AutoCAD SHX Text

41

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

573

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIGURE NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

15000265A

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/19/2016

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOZZA DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

E. STEVENS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LORENZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN HALL PLAZA

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE SUMMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANNY HAGEN ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAKEVIEW AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELWOOD AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMERCE STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

KENSICO ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

159

AutoCAD SHX Text

303

AutoCAD SHX Text

251

AutoCAD SHX Text

92

AutoCAD SHX Text

423

AutoCAD SHX Text

704

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

18

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

43

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

97

AutoCAD SHX Text

0




2021 PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMESWEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR


AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

64

AutoCAD SHX Text

28

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

350

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

47

AutoCAD SHX Text

295

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

190

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

53

AutoCAD SHX Text

126

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

39

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

67

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

260

AutoCAD SHX Text

41

AutoCAD SHX Text

35

AutoCAD SHX Text

59

AutoCAD SHX Text

91

AutoCAD SHX Text

298

AutoCAD SHX Text

132

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

96

AutoCAD SHX Text

34

AutoCAD SHX Text

26

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

462

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

140

AutoCAD SHX Text

212

AutoCAD SHX Text

90

AutoCAD SHX Text

42

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

358

AutoCAD SHX Text

97

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

125

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

529

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

137

AutoCAD SHX Text

159

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

33

AutoCAD SHX Text

278

AutoCAD SHX Text

74

AutoCAD SHX Text

17

AutoCAD SHX Text

63

AutoCAD SHX Text

14

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

97

AutoCAD SHX Text

43

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

17

AutoCAD SHX Text

22

AutoCAD SHX Text

551

AutoCAD SHX Text

206

AutoCAD SHX Text

137

AutoCAD SHX Text

50

AutoCAD SHX Text

36

AutoCAD SHX Text

477

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIGURE NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

15000265A

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/19/2016

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOZZA DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

E. STEVENS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LORENZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN HALL PLAZA

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE SUMMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANNY HAGEN ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAKEVIEW AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELWOOD AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMERCE STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

KENSICO ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

97

AutoCAD SHX Text

362

AutoCAD SHX Text

642

AutoCAD SHX Text

133

AutoCAD SHX Text

329

AutoCAD SHX Text

347

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

23

AutoCAD SHX Text

53

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

36

AutoCAD SHX Text

26

AutoCAD SHX Text

54

AutoCAD SHX Text

0




OTHER DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC VOLUMESWEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR


AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

46

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

24

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

58

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

24

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

43

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

16

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

30

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

33

AutoCAD SHX Text

14

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

49

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

58

AutoCAD SHX Text

24

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

14

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

14

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

33

AutoCAD SHX Text

16

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

18

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIGURE NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

15000265A

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/19/2016

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOZZA DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

E. STEVENS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LORENZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN HALL PLAZA

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE SUMMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANNY HAGEN ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAKEVIEW AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELWOOD AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMERCE STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

KENSICO ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

17

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

34

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

30

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

0




OTHER DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC VOLUMESWEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR


AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

39

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

38

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

42

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

67

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

31

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

14

AutoCAD SHX Text

30

AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

14

AutoCAD SHX Text

37

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

58

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

22

AutoCAD SHX Text

16

AutoCAD SHX Text

27

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

17

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

36

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

42

AutoCAD SHX Text

67

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

19

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

23

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

38

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIGURE NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

15000265A

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/19/2016

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOZZA DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

E. STEVENS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LORENZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN HALL PLAZA

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE SUMMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANNY HAGEN ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAKEVIEW AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELWOOD AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMERCE STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

KENSICO ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

16

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

31

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

41

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0




2021 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMESWEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR


AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

42

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

137

AutoCAD SHX Text

298

AutoCAD SHX Text

26

AutoCAD SHX Text

98

AutoCAD SHX Text

407

AutoCAD SHX Text

36

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

300

AutoCAD SHX Text

18

AutoCAD SHX Text

78

AutoCAD SHX Text

142

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

16

AutoCAD SHX Text

48

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

296

AutoCAD SHX Text

60

AutoCAD SHX Text

85

AutoCAD SHX Text

113

AutoCAD SHX Text

58

AutoCAD SHX Text

315

AutoCAD SHX Text

137

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

22

AutoCAD SHX Text

28

AutoCAD SHX Text

80

AutoCAD SHX Text

487

AutoCAD SHX Text

55

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

221

AutoCAD SHX Text

134

AutoCAD SHX Text

185

AutoCAD SHX Text

151

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

389

AutoCAD SHX Text

44

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

77

AutoCAD SHX Text

68

AutoCAD SHX Text

693

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

253

AutoCAD SHX Text

102

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

34

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

31

AutoCAD SHX Text

120

AutoCAD SHX Text

82

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

257

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

27

AutoCAD SHX Text

38

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

70

AutoCAD SHX Text

32

AutoCAD SHX Text

705

AutoCAD SHX Text

138

AutoCAD SHX Text

287

AutoCAD SHX Text

41

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

591

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIGURE NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

15000265A

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/19/2016

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOZZA DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

E. STEVENS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LORENZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN HALL PLAZA

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE SUMMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANNY HAGEN ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAKEVIEW AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELWOOD AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMERCE STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

KENSICO ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

176

AutoCAD SHX Text

313

AutoCAD SHX Text

285

AutoCAD SHX Text

105

AutoCAD SHX Text

426

AutoCAD SHX Text

734

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

43

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

100

AutoCAD SHX Text

0




2021 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMESWEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR


AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

64

AutoCAD SHX Text

28

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

389

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

47

AutoCAD SHX Text

333

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

232

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

53

AutoCAD SHX Text

193

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

39

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

67

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

291

AutoCAD SHX Text

52

AutoCAD SHX Text

49

AutoCAD SHX Text

89

AutoCAD SHX Text

98

AutoCAD SHX Text

312

AutoCAD SHX Text

169

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

96

AutoCAD SHX Text

34

AutoCAD SHX Text

26

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

520

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

162

AutoCAD SHX Text

228

AutoCAD SHX Text

117

AutoCAD SHX Text

46

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

368

AutoCAD SHX Text

108

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

125

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

565

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

179

AutoCAD SHX Text

226

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

36

AutoCAD SHX Text

290

AutoCAD SHX Text

77

AutoCAD SHX Text

17

AutoCAD SHX Text

82

AutoCAD SHX Text

14

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

97

AutoCAD SHX Text

46

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

17

AutoCAD SHX Text

22

AutoCAD SHX Text

574

AutoCAD SHX Text

218

AutoCAD SHX Text

157

AutoCAD SHX Text

50

AutoCAD SHX Text

36

AutoCAD SHX Text

515

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIGURE NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

15000265A

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/19/2016

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOZZA DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

E. STEVENS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LORENZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN HALL PLAZA

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE SUMMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANNY HAGEN ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAKEVIEW AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELWOOD AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMERCE STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

KENSICO ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

113

AutoCAD SHX Text

368

AutoCAD SHX Text

673

AutoCAD SHX Text

146

AutoCAD SHX Text

340

AutoCAD SHX Text

388

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

26

AutoCAD SHX Text

53

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

36

AutoCAD SHX Text

26

AutoCAD SHX Text

59

AutoCAD SHX Text

0




ARRIVAL DISTRIBUTION(EXPRESSED AS A %)


AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

45

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIGURE NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

15000265A

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/19/2016

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOZZA DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

E. STEVENS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LORENZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN HALL PLAZA

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE SUMMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANNY HAGEN ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAKEVIEW AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELWOOD AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMERCE STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

KENSICO ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0




DEPARTURE DISTRIBUTION(EXPRESSED AS A %)


AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

60

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

60

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

40

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIGURE NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

15000265A

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/19/2016

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOZZA DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

E. STEVENS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LORENZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN HALL PLAZA

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE SUMMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANNY HAGEN ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAKEVIEW AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELWOOD AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMERCE STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

KENSICO ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0




SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMESWEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR


AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

18

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIGURE NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

15000265A

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/19/2016

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOZZA DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

E. STEVENS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LORENZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN HALL PLAZA

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE SUMMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANNY HAGEN ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAKEVIEW AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELWOOD AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMERCE STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

KENSICO ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0




SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMESWEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR


AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

32

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

32

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIGURE NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

15000265A

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/19/2016

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOZZA DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

E. STEVENS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LORENZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN HALL PLAZA

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE SUMMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANNY HAGEN ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAKEVIEW AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELWOOD AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMERCE STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

KENSICO ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0




2021 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMESWEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR


AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

42

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

137

AutoCAD SHX Text

298

AutoCAD SHX Text

26

AutoCAD SHX Text

104

AutoCAD SHX Text

411

AutoCAD SHX Text

36

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

300

AutoCAD SHX Text

18

AutoCAD SHX Text

78

AutoCAD SHX Text

142

AutoCAD SHX Text

17

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

22

AutoCAD SHX Text

48

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

296

AutoCAD SHX Text

60

AutoCAD SHX Text

85

AutoCAD SHX Text

117

AutoCAD SHX Text

58

AutoCAD SHX Text

316

AutoCAD SHX Text

137

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

22

AutoCAD SHX Text

38

AutoCAD SHX Text

80

AutoCAD SHX Text

487

AutoCAD SHX Text

73

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

221

AutoCAD SHX Text

134

AutoCAD SHX Text

189

AutoCAD SHX Text

157

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

393

AutoCAD SHX Text

44

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

78

AutoCAD SHX Text

78

AutoCAD SHX Text

693

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

255

AutoCAD SHX Text

102

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

34

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

31

AutoCAD SHX Text

121

AutoCAD SHX Text

82

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

267

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

27

AutoCAD SHX Text

38

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

70

AutoCAD SHX Text

32

AutoCAD SHX Text

706

AutoCAD SHX Text

139

AutoCAD SHX Text

297

AutoCAD SHX Text

41

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

599

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIGURE NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

15000265A

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/19/2016

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

14

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOZZA DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

E. STEVENS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LORENZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN HALL PLAZA

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE SUMMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANNY HAGEN ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAKEVIEW AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELWOOD AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMERCE STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

KENSICO ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

178

AutoCAD SHX Text

313

AutoCAD SHX Text

285

AutoCAD SHX Text

106

AutoCAD SHX Text

426

AutoCAD SHX Text

742

AutoCAD SHX Text

13

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

43

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

100

AutoCAD SHX Text

0




2021 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMESWEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR


AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

67

AutoCAD SHX Text

28

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

25

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

397

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

48

AutoCAD SHX Text

333

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

232

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

53

AutoCAD SHX Text

193

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

17

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

39

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

67

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

294

AutoCAD SHX Text

55

AutoCAD SHX Text

49

AutoCAD SHX Text

89

AutoCAD SHX Text

104

AutoCAD SHX Text

318

AutoCAD SHX Text

169

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

127

AutoCAD SHX Text

44

AutoCAD SHX Text

26

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

520

AutoCAD SHX Text

11

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

162

AutoCAD SHX Text

236

AutoCAD SHX Text

118

AutoCAD SHX Text

47

AutoCAD SHX Text

20

AutoCAD SHX Text

368

AutoCAD SHX Text

108

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

157

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

565

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

179

AutoCAD SHX Text

228

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

36

AutoCAD SHX Text

298

AutoCAD SHX Text

77

AutoCAD SHX Text

17

AutoCAD SHX Text

83

AutoCAD SHX Text

14

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

97

AutoCAD SHX Text

46

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

17

AutoCAD SHX Text

22

AutoCAD SHX Text

585

AutoCAD SHX Text

239

AutoCAD SHX Text

158

AutoCAD SHX Text

50

AutoCAD SHX Text

36

AutoCAD SHX Text

516

AutoCAD SHX Text

9

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIGURE NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB NUMBER:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

15000265A

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/19/2016

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOZZA DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

E. STEVENS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LORENZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIVE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN HALL PLAZA

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE SUMMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANNY HAGEN ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAKEVIEW AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

W. STEVENS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELWOOD AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMERCE STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMBUS AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

KENSICO ROAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

113

AutoCAD SHX Text

368

AutoCAD SHX Text

681

AutoCAD SHX Text

149

AutoCAD SHX Text

340

AutoCAD SHX Text

388

AutoCAD SHX Text

21

AutoCAD SHX Text

26

AutoCAD SHX Text

53

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

36

AutoCAD SHX Text

26

AutoCAD SHX Text

59

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

APPENDIX G

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT / DISTURBANCE

MEMORANDUM

1. Preliminary Report, dated November 2016, by

Historical Perspectives

1

HISTORICAL

PERSPECTIVES INC.

November 2016

Preliminary Assessment/Disturbance Memorandum

PepsiCo R&D Facility Expansion

350 Columbus Avenue and 100 East Stevens Avenue

Valhalla, Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester County, New York

INTRODUCTION

PepsiCo, Inc. (PepsiCo) proposes a new development at its Research and Development campus at 350 Columbus

Avenue, Valhalla, Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester County, New York (Figures 1, 2 and 3). The project site is

currently improved with a three-story office building and a two-story warehouse building/pilot plant facility,

together with related parking lots and other improvements. The proposed new development will include an

approximately 122,000 square-foot, three-story state-of-the-art research and development facility, together with a

new parking area, landscaping, and other associated site improvements (Figure 3). For the purposes of this study, all

of the locations within the project site slated for new development or other ground disturbance are considered the

Area of Potential Effect (APE).

At the request of PepsiCo, Historical Perspectives, Inc. (HPI) has undertaken the following Preliminary

Assessment/Disturbance Record study of the proposed site in order to: 1) identify categories of potential

archaeological resources on the project site; 2) examine the construction history of the project site in order to

determine the probability that any potential archaeological resources have survived post-depositional disturbances

and remain on the site; and 3) determine whether additional research, in the form of a Phase IA study may be

necessary.

METHODOLOGY

The present study entailed a review of various resources:

Historic maps were reviewed from the collections of the Map Division of the New York Public Library,

and using various online websites. These maps provided an overview of the topography and a chronology

of land usage for the study site.

Previously recorded archaeological sites were reviewed using data from the New York State Office of

Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation (NYSOPRHP).

Primary and secondary sources relating to the project site and its vicinity were reviewed, including historic

newspapers and photographs.

Soil boring data for the project site were provided by PepsiCo.

Several survey maps and construction photographs of the project site were provided by PepsiCo.

Last, a site visit was conducted on September 30, 2016 to assess any obvious or unrecorded subsurface

disturbance (Photographs 1-10; Figure 2).

CURRENT CONDITIONS

The PepsiCo campus is approximately 35 acres in size. It is bounded on the north by East Stevens Avenue, on the

south by property of the Valhalla Unified School District, on the west by the northbound lanes of Columbus Avenue

and on the east by private property. The campus was constructed in the late 1970s, and presently contains a three-

2

story office building, a two-story warehouse building/pilot plant facility, parking lots, driveways, and other

improvements. The campus has entrances on both Columbus Avenue and East Stevens Avenue that connect via a

looping drive (Photographs 1-3). The area at the northwest corner of the campus contains ball fields that were

constructed by grading the naturally sloping landform to create a level surface (Photographs 4 and 5). The highest

point on the property is south of East Stevens Avenue, where a number of structures once stood. Today this area

contains a surface parking lot and an associated subsurface infiltration system to collect excess runoff (Photographs

6 and 7). The only former structure that is still partially extant is a former swimming pool that has been filled in

(Photograph 8). The project also includes reconfiguration of existing surface parking lots and driveways on the

southern portion of the property (Photographs 9 and 10). Wetlands and a drainage are located on the eastern portion

of the campus.

TOPOGRAPHY AND HYDROLOGY

The earliest available topographic map that notes elevations indicates that in its original state, the project site

contained a gently to moderately sloping landform, with a north-south oriented terrace roughly bisecting the

property. Historic occupation, along with an entry driveway, was situated along this terrace landform. Elevations

on the site ranged from approximately 380 feet above sea level at the southwest corner of the property to

approximately 460 feet at the entry drive on East Stevens Avenue (U.S.G.S. 1938, Figure 6). There has been

significant earthmoving on the site since the late 1970s, however, and today although some elevations are similar to

pre-construction conditions, the shape of the landform has been altered in many places from its natural state (Figure

2).

There is a stream that runs north-south through the eastern side of the project site. It is surrounded in places by

wetlands. Prior to construction of Kensico Reservoir, the stream emptied into the Bronx River. This stream has

been modified to create a stormwater basin.

SOILS

There are a number of soils mapped for the project site (U.S.D.A. 2016). These soils are described in Table 1,

below. The area containing the ball fields south of East Stevens Avenue is mapped as Chatfield-Charlton complex,

hilly, very rocky. The area east of the entry drive on East Stevens Avenue is mapped as Paxton fine sandy loam and

further east, Ridgebury loam. The remainder of the project site is mapped as Udorthents and Urban Land, signifying

prior earthmoving.

Table 1: Soils mapped within the project site

Name Soil Horizon Depth

cm(in)

Texture,

Inclusions

Slope

%

Drainage Landform

Chatfield-

Charlton

complex,

hilly, very

rocky (CrC)

0-7 in

7-24 in

24-28 in

Lo

FlaSiLo

Bedrock

15-35 Well Hills and ridges

Paxton fine

sandy loam

(PnC)

0-8 in

8-15 in

15-26 in

26-65 in

FiSaLo

FiSaLo

FiSaLo

GrlFiSaLo

8-15 Well Drumlins, ground

moraines, hills

Ridgebury

loam (RdA)

0-8 in

8-26 in

26-60 in

Lo

GrlFiSaLo

GrlLo

0-3 Poorly Depressions

Udorthents,

smoothed

(Ub)

0-4 in

4-70 in

GrlLo

VGrlLo

0-8 Moderately

well

N/A

Urban land

(Uf)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Key: Soils: Lo-Loam, Sa-Sand, Si-Silt

Other: Fi-Fine, Grl-Gravelly, V-Very

3

Four sets of soil borings were provided by PepsiCo for the project site. The first two sets were completed prior to

construction on the property, in 1977 and 1978. Those borings indicated a range of natural soil conditions across the

project site. None of the soil borings recorded any fill materials.

The third set of 14 soil borings was completed in 2015. Of the borings, numbers B-1, 2, and 3 were located east of the

entry drive on East Stevens Avenue, numbers B-4 through B-11 were located on the existing ball field south of East

Stevens Avenue, and numbers B-12 through B-14 were located on the sloped ground between the existing ball field and

the entry drive leading from Columbus Avenue. The majority of the 2015 borings noted a thick upper stratum of fill,

attesting to significant earthmoving as a result of construction on the project site since the late 1970s. Three of the eight

borings on the ball field did not record fill, nor did the borings on the sloped ground. Beneath the fill were soil strata

corresponding to natural subsoils. The following text describes the soil profiles from the 2015 borings in detail (Carlin

Simpson & Associates 2015a:2).

Topsoil - The surface layer in each of the test borings, except for borings B-8 and B-9, is topsoil

that is that ranges from 3 to 8 inches in thickness.

Fill - At the surface in borings B-8 and B-9 and below the topsoil in borings B-1, B-2, B-3, B-10,

and B-11 is existing fill that generally consists of loose to dense brown, gray brown, light red

brown, or gray coarse to fine Sand, little to and Silt, little to and coarse to fine Gravel, with

several cobbles and boulders. Minor amounts of topsoil were noted within the fill in borings B-9

and B-10. Trace amounts of asphalt debris were also encountered within the fill in boring B-11.

Cobbles and boulders were noted within the fill. The existing fill continued to depths ranging

from 1’6” to 9’6” below the existing ground surface.

Silty Sand with Gravel - Underlying the existing fill is medium dense to very dense brown or

gray brown coarse to fine Sand, little to and Silt, trace to and coarse to fine Gravel that transitions

to completely weathered schist or schist bedrock. Borings B-1, B-2, B-5, B-9 and B-10 were

terminated in this stratum at final depths ranging from 8’0” to 27’0” beneath the existing ground

surface.

Completely Weathered Schist – At several boring locations the natural soils transition to

completely weathered rock in a very dense “soil like” or soft rock state. Completely weathered

schist was noted in 8 of the 14 test borings beginning at depths ranging from 2’6” to 16’6” below

the ground surface.

Schist Bedrock – Schist bedrock was cored at borings B-4, B-11, B-13 and B-14 for a vertical

distance of 5 feet. The rock core recoveries ranged from 50 percent at boring B-11 to 100 percent

at the other three boring locations. The rock quality designation (RQD) of the recovered cores

ranged from 0 percent at boring B-11 to 100 percent. Based on these values, the quality of the

upper 5 feet of the bedrock is highly variable ranging from very poor (completely weathered to

highly weathered rock) to excellent (intact rock).

The fourth set of soil borings also was completed in 2015, in locations proposed for stormwater management areas. The

borings were located at the northwest corner of the project site, and in existing parking lots. Again, all but one soil

boring contained a thick upper stratum of fill, followed by natural subsoil (Carlin Simpson & Associates 2015b).

SUMMARY HISTORY OF THE PROJECT SITE

Precontact Occupation

For this report, the word precontact is used to describe the period prior to the use of formal written records. In the

western hemisphere, the precontact period also refers to the time before European exploration and settlement of the

New World. Archaeologists and historians gain their knowledge and understanding of precontact Native Americans

in Westchester County from three sources: ethnographic reports, Native American artifact collections, and

archaeological investigations.

Based on data from these sources, a precontact cultural chronology has been devised for the Westchester County

area. Scholars generally divide the precontact era into three main periods, the Paleo-Indian (c. 14,000-9,500 years

ago), the Archaic (c. 9,500-3,000 years ago), and the Woodland (c. 3,000-500 years ago). The Archaic and

4

Woodland periods are further divided into Early, Middle, and Late substages. The Woodland was followed by the

Contact Period (c. 500-300 years ago). Artifacts, settlement, subsistence, and cultural systems changed through time

with each of these stages. Characteristics of these temporal periods have been well documented elsewhere, and in

keeping with guidelines issued by the NYSOPRHP (2005), will not be fully reiterated here.

Scholars often characterize precontact sites by their close proximity to a water source, fresh game, and exploitable

natural resources (i.e., plants, raw materials for stone tools, clay veins, etc.). These sites are often separated into

three categories: primary (campsites or villages), secondary (tool manufacturing, food processing), and isolated

finds (a single or very few artifacts either lost or discarded). Primary sites are often situated in locales that are easily

defended against both nature (weather) and enemies. Secondary sites are often found in the location of exploitable

resources (e.g., shell fish, lithic raw materials).

A review of records of the NYSOPRHP and the New York State Museum (NYSM) indicate that no precontact

period sites have been previously recorded within a one-mile radius of the project site. One historic period

archaeological site has been documented within a one-mile radius of the project site, as shown in the table, below. .

Site # and name Distance from APE Time Period Site Name/Type

11908.000401

Onderdonk/Reynolds site

0.5 mile northeast 19th

century Fieldstone foundation

and associated artifacts

Construction History of the Project Site

The Town of Mount Pleasant, including the area surrounding and encompassing the project site, historically fell within

the Manor of Phillipsburgh (French 1860: 702). By the 1750s, over a thousand people were living on the Manor,

farming the land and clearing its forests for lumber. The majority of these residents were tenant farms who leased land-

use rights from the Phillipse family (French 1860: 700). During the eighteenth century, a grist mill was built within the

Manor, along the Bronx River, southeast of the project site, in the area now covered by Kensico Reservoir. The small

hamlet established around the mill was known as Wright’s Mills after the mill’s owner Reuben Wright.

Following the completion of the Revolutionary war, all of the land within the Manor of Phillipsburgh became vested in

the State of New York as punishment for Colonel Frederick Phillipse’s loyalist stance (Scharf 1886: 284). The State

subsequently sold off the Manor territory with grantee preference often being granted to those who had previously

farmed certain tracts of land (Yoshpe 1938).

Mount Pleasant became a township on March 7, 1788 (Scharf 1886: 283). Its territorial limits were adjusted by the

creation of the township of Ossining in 1845. With this separation, the boundaries of Mount Pleasant became the

Hudson River and Ossining to the west, the limits of Ossining, New Castle and North Castle to the north, North Castle to

the east, and Greenburgh to the south. The project site lies in the southeastern corner of Mount Pleasant.

Columbus Avenue and East Stevens Avenue were both in place by at least the mid-nineteenth century, according to

historic maps (Sidney and Neff 1851, Beers 1868, 1872, Bromley 1881, Bien 1893). The project site was accessible via

East Stevens Avenue, which was previously known as Upper Cross Road. There were structures within the project site

south of East Stevens Avenue, situated both adjacent to the road and along the ridge top that marks the highest spot on

the project site, east of where the present ball fields are located today. The property and the structures were attributed to

the Field family during the second half of the nineteenth century. The western side of the project site was part of a parcel

bordering Columbus Avenue and attributed to “N. Field.” The remainder of the project site was attributed to “G. Field.”

The Field family holdings extended south of the project site as well, and included the area now occupied by the Valhalla

school district and fire house.

During the early twentieth century, the project site was transferred to new owners. William H. Malcolmb owned 20

acres bordering Columbus Avenue and the New York Life Insurance Company owned the remaining acreage south of

East Stevens Avenue (Bromley 1901). By 1911, the main part of the project site was within a 46-acre parcel attributed

to Mrs. M.E. Malcolmb (Bromley 1911, Figure 4).

In 1924, the Malcolmb family sold its holdings to the Children’s Aid Society, the New York City based charity

organization that provides services to underprivileged children. The 1930 Hopkins map (Figure 5) illustrates the project

5

site during the period it was owned by the Children’s Aid Society. The “Martha Home” was a group home that served as

a convalescent facility for boys under the age of 12. There were several “Martha Homes” throughout the New York City

region. The 1938 U.S.G.S. map (Figure 6) also labels the main building on the property as the “Martha Home.”

The Children’s Aid Society owned the project site until 1967; in 1969 the current owner, PepsiCo, purchased the

property. That same year, a survey was made of the property indicating the existing structures on the site (Figure 7). At

the time, there were four buildings on the site, two immediately south of East Stevens Avenue and two further towards

the interior of the property and accessed by a long driveway. Three of the buildings appear to have been residences, and

the fourth was a garage. The Martha Home was the southernmost of the residences. The filled-in former swimming

pool observed during the site visit was located just west of the Martha Home. It is the only visible remain that attests to

the former use of the project site.

After PepsiCo purchased the project site, all of the former structures on the property were removed. Figure 7 was

annotated by PepsiCo at a later date to indicate that two of the buildings burned down and two were demolished. The

PepsiCo site plan for the property was approved by the Town of Mount Pleasant in 1977, and construction of the campus

began shortly thereafter. The 1977 site plan that was approved included a proposed building and associated surface

parking lots in the northwest quadrant of the property, in the approximate location of the present ball fields. Photographs

of the property during construction reveal significant earthmoving to create the present office park setting (Photographs

11 and 12).

The late 1970s construction on the project site included the two present office buildings, the entry driveways, the parking

areas, and the site infrastructure. The existing ball fields in the northwest quadrant of the project site were created in the

1990s, and involved extensive grading and filling to create the generally level fields from the naturally sloping landform.

The most recent construction on the site was in 2008, when the surface parking lot and subsurface infiltration system was

created just west of the East Stevens Avenue entry drive.

CONCLUSIONS

Disturbance Record

The project site has been very heavily disturbed from earthmoving associated with construction of the present PepsiCo

office park buildings and its associated driveways, parking lots, ball fields, and subsurface utility infrastructure. Soil

borings indicate large amounts of fill throughout the property, capping natural subsoils. There is no indication from the

soil borings that any natural upper soil strata, such as a buried A horizon, still exist on the project site. Further, other than

the infilled former swimming pool, there is no visible evidence of any historic structures or associated features on the

project site that predate the PepsiCo construction in the 1970s.

Precontact Sensitivity

From what is known of precontact period settlement patterns in Westchester County, most habitation and processing

sites are found in sheltered, elevated sites close to wetland features, major waterways, and with nearby sources of fresh

water. The project site contains a natural drainage and wetlands on its eastern side, which normally could indicate

precontact sensitivity. However, based on the later degree of significant landform manipulation and disturbance to the

property, HPI concludes that today the project site has minimal precontact sensitivity. Therefore, further research and

study concerning precontact archaeological resources is not recommended.

Historical Sensitivity

The project site formerly contained several historical structures dating at least to the nineteenth century, south of East

Stevens Avenue. However, as noted above, the significant earthmoving associated with construction of the PepsiCo

campus has removed any visible evidence of these resources, and it is likely that no intact subsurface remains have

survived this extensive landform manipulation. Therefore, further research and study concerning historic period

archaeological resources is not recommended.

6

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the above conclusions, HPI recommends no further archaeological investigations are necessary for the project

site.

7

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Beers, Elias Soule

1868 Atlas of New York and Vicinity. E. Beers and Company, New York.

1872 County Atlas of Westchester. E. Beers and Company, New York.

Bien, Julius

1893 Town of North Castle.

Bromley, George Washington

1881 Atlas of Westchester County. George W. and Walter S. Bromley. G.W. Bromley and Company,

Philadelphia.

1901 Atlas of Westchester County, New York. George W. and Walter S. Bromley. G.W. Bromley and Company,

Philadelphia.

1911 Atlas of Westchester County, New York. Bromley & Co., New York.

Carlin Simpson & Associates

2015a Geotechnical Memo: Project Eden, Pepsi – Valhalla Campus, Valhalla, New York. Prepared for JMC.

2015b Geotechnical Memo: Project Eden, Pepsi – Valhalla Campus, Valhalla, New York. Prepared for JMC.

French, J.H.

1860 Gazetteer of the State of New York. Westchester County, NY.

Hopkins, G.M. Company

1930 Atlas of Westchester County, New York. Hopkins Company, Philadelphia.

John Meyer Consultants

2016 Project site maps.

New York Archaeological Council (NYAC)

1994 Standards for Cultural Resource Investigations and the Curation of Archaeological Collections. New

York Archaeological Council.

New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation (NYSOPRHP)

2005 Phase I Archaeological Report Format Requirements.

Scharf, J. Thomas

1886 History of Westchester County, New York. Two volumes. Picton Press, Maine. L.E. Preston and

Company, Philadelphia.

Sidney, J.C and Neff.

1851 Map of Westchester County, New York. Map on file at the Tarrytown Historical Society, Tarrytown, New

York.

United States Department of Agriculture (U.S.D.A.)

2016 Web Soil Survey. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed September 22, 2016.

Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.)

1938 Topographic Map, White Plains, New York, Quadrangle. 7.5 Minute Series. Surveyed 1932, printed 1938.

United States Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior.

8

2016 Topographic Map, White Plains, New York Quadrangle. 7.5 Minute Series. United States Geological

Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior.

Yoshpe, Harry B.

1938 The Disposition of Philipse Manor After the Revolution. Quarterly Bulletin of the Westchester County

Historical Society 14(4): 87-88.

Preliminary Assessment/Disturbance MemorandumPepsiCo R&D Facility Expansion350 Columbus Avenue and 100 East Stevens AvenueValhalla, Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester County, New York

Figure 1: Project site on White Plains, NY 7.5 Minute Quadrangle (U.S.G.S. 2016).

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 FEET

Key

Project site

Drawing No:

Project No:

Date:

Scale:

Drawn: Approved:




OWNE

R:

APPL

ICAN

T:No

.Re

vision

Date

By

COPY

RIGH

T ©

2016

by JM

CAl

l Righ

ts Re

serve

d. N

o par

t of th

is do

cume

nt ma

y be r

epro

duce

d, sto

red i

n a re

trieva

l sys

tem, o

r tra

nsmi

tted i

n any

form

or by

mea

ns, e

lectro

nic, m

echa

nical,

photo

copy

ing, r

ecor

ding o

r othe

rwise

, with

out th

e prio

r writt

en pe

rmiss

ion of

JMC

PLAN

NING

, ENG

INEE

RING

, LAN

DSCA

PE A

RCHI

TECT

URE

& LA

ND S

URVE

YING

, PLL

C | J

MC S

ITE

DEVE

LOPM

ENT

CONS

ULTA

NTS,

LLC

| JOH

N ME

YER

CONS

ULTI

NG, IN

C. (J

MC).

Any

mod

ificati

ons o

r alte

ratio

ns to

this

docu

ment

witho

ut the

writt

en pe

rmiss

ion of

JMC

shall

rend

er th

em in

valid

and u

nusa

ble.

053 GNIDLIUB GNITSIXE

EXISTIN

G BUILDIN

G 100

Figure 2: Project site showing existing conditions, steep slopes, and photograph locations (JMC 2016).

Key

Project site

Photographs1

7

8

9

10

6

5

4

3

2

1

11

12

Figure 3: Proposed project development (JMC 2016).


Figure 4: Project site on Atlas of Westchester County, New York (Bromley 1911).

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 FEET

Key

Project site


Figure 5: Project site on Atlas of Westchester County, New York (Hopkins 1930).

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 FEET

Key

Project site


Figure 6: Project site on White Plains, NY 7.5 Minute Quadrangle (U.S.G.S. 1938).

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 FEET

Key

Project site

Figure 7: Project site on Site Development Plan Prepared for PepsiCo, Inc., Valhalla in the Town of Mount Pleasant (Ward Carpenter Engineers 1969).

Key

Project site

Photograph 1: Present entry drive from East Stevens Avenue showing area cut down. View looking northeast.

Photograph 2: Sloped and contoured hill side leading up to ball fields. View looking northwest.

Photograph 3: Driveway and sloped hill side where new building is proposed. View looking northwest.

Photograph 4: Artificially graded ball field where new parking is proposed. View looking west.

Photograph 5: Detail of artificially graded berms surrounding ball field. View looking southwest.

Photograph 6: Subsurface infiltration system south of East Stevens Avenue and associated with surface parking lot

to left. Ball field is to right. View looking south.

Photograph 7: Former residential site south of East Stevens Avenue, now containing parking lots. View looking

north.

Photograph 8: Former swimming pool now filled in. View looking northwest.

Photograph 9: Existing surface parking lot to be reconfigured as part of new development. View looking south.

Photograph 10: Artificially contoured hill side at southern end of property. View looking southwest.

Photograph 11: Construction of East Stevens Avenue entry drive in late 1970s. View looking northwest.

Photograph 12: Grading and landscaping of project site in late 1970s. View looking northwest toward East Stevens

Avenue.

APPENDIX H

AIR FACILITY REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE

1. NYSDEC Air Facility Registration Certificate,

effective January 14, 2013

APPENDIX I

VALHALLA FIRE DEPARTMENTPARCEL DOCUMENTATION

PepsiCo Research & Development Facility Expansion Project

Documents