Top Banner
The adequacy of phylogenetic trait models Matthew Pennell @mwpennell
97

Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Aug 23, 2014

Download

Science

mwpennell

Talk on assessing the adequacy of phylogenetic trait models. Presented at Evolution 2014.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The adequacy of phylogenetic trait modelsMatthew Pennell @mwpennell

Page 2: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

In collaboration withRich FitzJohn Will Cornwell Luke Harmon

Page 3: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk
Page 4: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

R2=0.67; p=0.002 R2=0.67; p=0.002

R2=0.67; p=0.002 R2=0.67; p=0.002Anscombe 1973

Page 5: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Is the model appropriate?

If not, what are we missing?

Page 6: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Is the model appropriate?

And if not, what are we missing?

Page 7: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ●

For simple regression models

Coo

k’s d

istan

ce

Observation

Page 8: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

For simple regression modelsRe

sidua

ls

Fitted values

● ●

Page 9: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Statistical tests of model adequacycompliment visual intuition

Page 10: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For phylogenetic trait models

Plotting the relevant data is challenging

No general methods for assessing model adequacy

Page 11: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Especially for complex models

θ1

θ2

θ3

Page 12: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For phylogenetic trait models

Plotting the relevant data is challenging

No general methods for assessing model adequacy

Page 13: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Our approach

Page 14: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Establishing scope

Quantitative traits

Univariate trait models

Tip states assume to ~ multivariate Gaussian

Page 15: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Fit a model to comparative data

Use "tted parameters to simulate data

Compare observed to simulated data

The general idea

Page 16: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The general idea

Fit a model to comparative data

Use "tted parameters to simulate data

Compare observed to simulated data

Page 17: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The general idea

Fit a model to comparative data

Use "tted parameters to simulate data

Compare observed to simulated data

Page 18: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Old statistical idea

θ

Pr(D

|θ)

θ

Pr(θ

|D)

Parametric bootstrapping

Posterior predictive simulation

Page 19: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

If we re-ran evolution, how likely are we to see a dataset like ours?

Page 20: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Simulated data similar to observedModel likely adequate

Simulated data very different from observedModel likely inadequate

Page 21: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Comparing observed to simulated data

No two datasets are exactly alike

Use test statistics to summarize data in meaningfulways

Page 22: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

No two datasets are exactly alike

Use test statistics to summarize data in meaningfulways

Comparing observed to simulated data

Page 23: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Species are not independent data points

Calculate test-statistics on contrasts

Comparing observed to simulated data

Page 24: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Species are not independent data points

Calculate test statistics on contrasts

Comparing observed to simulated data

Page 25: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Independent contrasts

A

B

C

Ci

Cj

n-1contrasts for n tips

Under BM modelC ~ Gaussian(0, σ)

Page 26: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

When model is not Brownian motion

Contrasts no longer expected to be ~ Gaussian

Rescale branch lengths of phylogeny

Page 27: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

When model is not Brownian motion

Contrasts no longer expected to be ~ Gaussian

Rescale branch lengths of phylogeny

Page 28: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For models that predict tip states to be multivariate Gaussian

ln L = -0.5[n ln(2π) + ln|Σ| + (Y - μX)’Σ-1(Y - μX)]

Page 29: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For models that predict tip states to be multivariate Gaussian

ln L = -0.5[n ln(2π) + ln|Σ| + (Y - μX)’Σ-1(Y - μX)]

Y is the observed tip states for the n species

μ is the mean of observed data

X is a column vector of 1

Σ is the expected variance-covariance matrixfor the tip states under the model

Page 30: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For models that predict tip states to be multivariate Gaussian

ln L = -0.5[n ln(2π) + ln|Σ| + (Y - μX)’Σ-1(Y - μX)]

Y is the observed tip states for the n species

μ is the mean of observed data

X is a column vector of 1

Σ is the expected variance-covariance matrixfor the tip states under the model

Page 31: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For models that predict tip states to be multivariate Gaussian

ln L = -0.5[n ln(2π) + ln|Σ| + (Y - μX)’Σ-1(Y - μX)]

Y is the observed tip states for the n species

μ is the mean of observed data

X is a column vector of 1

Σ is the expected variance-covariance matrixfor the tip states under the model

Page 32: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For models that predict tip states to be multivariate Gaussian

ln L = -0.5[n ln(2π) + ln|Σ| + (Y - μX)’Σ-1(Y - μX)]

Y is the observed tip states for the n species

μ is the mean of observed data

X is a column vector of 1

Σ is the expected variance-covariance matrixfor the tip states under the model

Page 33: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The Σ matrix

If we "t a Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model

Σij = σ2/2α(1-e-2αT)e-αCij

Page 34: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The Σ matrix

If we "t a Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model

Σij = σ2/2α(1-e-2αT)e-αCij

σ2 rate of diffusion

α pull towards optimum

T tree height

Cij shared branch lengthbetween tips i and j

Page 35: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The Σ matrix

If we "t a Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model

Σij = σ2/2α(1-e-2αT)e-αCij

σ2 rate of diffusion

α pull towards optimum

T tree height

Cij shared branch lengthbetween tips i and j

Page 36: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The Σ matrix

If we "t a Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model

Σij = σ2/2α(1-e-2αT)e-αCij

σ2 rate of diffusion

α pull towards optimum

T tree height

Cij shared branch lengthbetween tips i and j

Page 37: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The Σ matrix

If we "t a Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model

Σij = σ2/2α(1-e-2αT)e-αCij

σ2 rate of diffusion

α pull towards optimum

T tree height

Cij shared branch lengthbetween tips i and j

Page 38: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Building a unit tree

Rescale branch lengths by the amount of co(variance) we expect to accumulate under the model

A

B

C

vi’ = ΣAB - ΣAC

vi

Page 39: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Unit tree example

Ornstein-Uhlenbeck modelσ2 = 0.5 | α = 1

A

B

C

A

B

C

Page 40: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The nice thing about unit trees

Transformation applies to most* models ofcontinuous trait evolution

If model is adequate, contrasts on unit tree will beI.I.D. ~ Gaussian(0, 1)

Page 41: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Also applies to PGLS-style models

Create unit tree from parameter estimates

Compute contrasts on the residuals

If model is adequate contrasts of residuals will beGaussian(0,1) - same test statistics apply

Page 42: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Can compute test statistics onunit tree contrasts to assess adequacy

Page 43: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Var(contrasts)

|Con

tras

ts|

Ancestral state Node height

Contrasts2

Den

sity

Den

sity

Contrasts XCu

mul

ativ

e Pr

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

}

|Con

tras

ts|

|Con

tras

ts|

Page 44: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Var(contrasts)

|Con

tras

ts|

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Ancestral state

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Node height

Contrasts2

Den

sity

Den

sity

Contrasts XCu

mul

ativ

e Pr

}

|Con

tras

ts|

|Con

tras

ts|

Page 45: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Var(contrasts)

|Con

tras

ts|

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Ancestral state

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Node height

Contrasts2

Den

sity

Den

sity

Contrasts XCu

mul

ativ

e Pr

}

|Con

tras

ts|

|Con

tras

ts|

Page 46: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Var(contrasts)

|Con

tras

ts|

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Ancestral state

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Node height

Contrasts2

Den

sity

Den

sity

Contrasts XCu

mul

ativ

e Pr

}

|Con

tras

ts|

|Con

tras

ts|

Page 47: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Var(contrasts)

|Con

tras

ts|

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Ancestral state

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Node height

Contrasts2

Den

sity

Den

sity

Contrasts XCu

mul

ativ

e Pr

}

|Con

tras

ts|

|Con

tras

ts|

Page 48: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Var(contrasts)

|Con

tras

ts|

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Ancestral state

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Node height

Contrasts2

Den

sity

Den

sity

Contrasts XCu

mul

ativ

e Pr

}

|Con

tras

ts|

|Con

tras

ts|

Page 49: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Var(contrasts)

|Con

tras

ts|

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Ancestral state

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Node height

Contrasts2

Den

sity

Den

sity

Contrasts XCu

mul

ativ

e Pr

}

|Con

tras

ts|

|Con

tras

ts|

Page 50: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Simulating new datasets

Tree has already been transformed

Simulate m new datasets under BM with σ2 = 1

Page 51: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Calculate test statistics on contrasts of simulated data

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

}●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

}

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

}

Page 52: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Compare observed test statistics todistribution of simulated test statistics

Page 53: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Putting it all together

Page 54: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Estimate θ

Page 55: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Estimate θ

Build unit tree

Page 56: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Estimate θ

Build unit tree

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Test statisticsobs data

Page 57: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Estimate θ

Build unit tree

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Test statisticsobs data

Simulate BM data

Page 58: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Estimate θ

Build unit tree

Test statisticsobs data

Simulate BM data

Test statisticssim data

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Page 59: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Estimate θ

Build unit tree

Test statisticsobs data

Simulate BM data

Test statisticssim data

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Compare sim to obstest statistics

Page 61: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

arbutus R package

Designed to interact with other R packages

Object-oriented

New models and test statistics can easily be added

Page 62: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

arbutus R package

library(diversitree)lik <- make.bm(phy, data)div.fit <- find.mle(lik, x.init=1)

arbutus(div.fit)

library(geiger)g.fit <- fitContinuous(phy, data, model = “BM”)

arbutus(g.fit)

Page 63: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

E.g.: seed mass evolution in Fagaceae

Page 64: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model

}

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Page 65: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model

}

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Page 66: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Are common trait models adequatefor real comparative data?

Page 67: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Analysis of 337 comparative datasets

Brownian motion

ree important plant functional traits

72 datasets (20-2,200 spp.) for speci"c leaf area

226 datasets (20-22,817 spp.) for seed mass

39 datasets (20-936 spp.) for leaf nitrogen

Wright et al. 2004Kleyer et al. 2008

Kew SID 2014

Page 68: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Brownian motionZanne et al. 2014

Page 69: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For each dataset

Fit three simple models of trait evolution (Brownian Motion, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck, Early Burst)

Compared model "t using AIC

Assessed the adequacy of the best-supported model

Page 70: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Model comparison using AIC

Datasets (1-337)

AIC

w

Brownian motion

Brownian motion Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Early Burst

Page 71: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Here’s the dark side

Page 72: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Best model rejected (p>0.05) - ML

72/72 speci"c leaf area datasets

185/226 seed mass datasets

39/39 leaf nitrogen datasets

Page 73: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

p-values -- REML est. of σ2

p-value0 0.80

Den

sity

Speci"c leaf area Seed mass Leaf nitrogen

Page 74: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Models get worse as trees get bigger

Log(Tree Size)20 11,000

Dist

(sim

, obs

)

Speci"c leaf area Seed mass Leaf nitrogen

Page 75: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Simple, commonly used modelsare often woefully inadequate

Page 76: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

But...we already knew that

Page 77: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

We are (often) here

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

Page 78: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

This is how we learn about biology!

Page 79: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Learn about issues with the data

Page 80: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Common issues with data

Phylogenetic error (topology & branch lengths)

Measurement error

Biologically interesting ‘outlier’ species

Page 81: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Learn about evolutionary processes

●●

Page 82: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Many ways to add complexity

Time heterogeneous models

Different models for different parts of the tree

Biologically motivated models

Page 83: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Test statistics can help us make informed decisions

May suggest types of models that have not even beendeveloped yet

Page 84: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Does it matter if a model is inadequate?

Page 85: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

It depends on the question...

}

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

What is the rate of seed mass evolution?

Single optimum OU model is very misleading

Page 86: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

It depends on the question...

What is the rate of seed mass evolution?

Single optimum OU model is very misleading

}

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Page 87: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

It depends on the question...

Was there an “early burst” in seed mass evolution?

Inadequate OU model likely doesn’t affect inference

}

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Page 88: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

It depends on the question...

Was there an “early burst” in seed mass evolution?

Inadequate OU model likely doesn’t affect inference

}

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Page 89: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Model adequacy is not binary

Whether the model is “good enough” depends on what questions you are asking

Page 90: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Some concluding thoughts

Page 91: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Understanding how a model fails can provide interesting biological insights

Page 92: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Pay attention to parameter estimates

Look carefully at the data

Plot the test statistics

Keep the question in mind

Page 93: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Pay attention to parameter estimates

Look carefully at the data

Plot the test statistics

Keep the question in mind

Page 94: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Pay attention to parameter estimates

Look carefully at the data

Plot the test statistics

Keep the question in mind

Page 95: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Pay attention to parameter estimates

Look carefully at the data

Plot the test statistics

Keep the question in mind

Page 96: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Advice and encouragementJosef UyedaDaniel CaetanoPaul JoyceGraham Slater

Amy ZanneRoxana HickeyAnahi EspindolaSimon Uribe-Convers

FundingNSFNSERC

NESCentUniversity of Idaho

NESCent Tempo & mode working group