Top Banner
Pediatric ESRD All night long their nets they threw For the fish in the twinkling foam, Then down from the sky came the wooden shoe, Bringing the fishermen home; ’T was all so pretty a sail, it seemed As if it could not be; And some folk thought ’t was a dream they’d dreamed Of sailing that beautiful sea; But I shall name you the fishermen three: Wynken, Blynken, And Nod. Eugene Field “Dutch Lullaby”
18

Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

Feb 14, 2019

Download

Documents

dinhthien
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

Pediatric ESRDAll night long their nets they threw Forthefishinthetwinklingfoam,Thendownfromtheskycamethewooden

shoe, Bringingthefishermenhome;’Twasallsoprettyasail,itseemed Asifitcouldnotbe;Andsomefolkthought’twasadream

they’ddreamed Ofsailingthatbeautifulsea; ButIshallnameyouthefishermen

three: Wynken,Blynken,AndNod.

Eugene Field “Dutch Lullaby”

Page 2: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

Pevident than the growth of children with kidney disease. On the next page we show that 65 per-cent of children with ESRD have a growth rate in the lowest one-fifth of the general population, yet only 30 percent of these children receive re-combinant human growth hormone (rhGH), a therapy approved by the FDA for this indication. It is unclear whether providers are paying atten-tion to this area, or whether payment systems are biased against treatment.

Other elements of care in the pediatric ESRD population are also puzzling. Children with sec-ondary glomerulonephritis, for example, have the lowest rates of ESA use prior to initiation of ESRD therapy, the lowest rates of pre-ESRD re-ferral to nephrologists and kidney dietitians, the lowest glycosylated hemoglobin levels at initia-tion, and the highest triglyceride levels. One ex-planation for the lack of pre-ESRD care in chil-dren with secondary glomerulonephritis may be that sicker patients are referred later by their primary care physicians, after kidney failure has become clear. This issue requires considerable attention, particularly since overall survival in the pediatric population has not improved over the last ten years.

New to the chapter this year are data from the revised Medical Evidence form, assessing pre-ESRD nephrology referral and dietitian care, and the use of dialysis catheters. As in their adult counterparts, catheter use rates are high among children—higher, in fact, than they were five years ago. Because catheters are associated with infectious complications and morbidity, this is a major concern.

As also seen in the adult population, anemia treatment in children with ESRD continues to raise concern as well. Overshooting of target he-moglobin levels is as common here as in adults, placing children at risk of serious complications. Prolonged periods at high hemoglobin levels may compromise dialysis catheter accesses, lead-ing to increased hospitalizations.

Influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia can also, of course, lead to increase hospitalization rates and higher risks of mortality. The low rates of vaccination against these diseases have im-proved, but still remain far below recommended levels. And there continue to be discrepancies in vaccination rates by modality, with hemodialysis patients more likely to be vaccinated than those on peritoneal dialysis or with a transplant.

Pediatric end-stage renal disease patients pose unique challenges to providers and to the healthcare system, which must address not only the disease itself in these patients, but the many extra-renal manifestations that affect their lives and their families. None is more

1748

Page 3: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

As mentioned, there has been no progress in the five-year survival of pediatric ESRD patients. In some populations, in fact, the likelihood of survival declined slightly between the 1991–1995 and 1996–2000 periods. Children with a transplant continue to have the great-est chance of surviving five years, at 0.93 in 1996–2000, compared to 0.79 and 0.82 for hemodialysis and peri-toneal dialysis patients, respectively.

Concluding this year’s chapter, we present new in-formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median height of the ESRD popula-tion is at just the 6.7th per-centile of that reported for the general population, yet only one in three children are treated with recombi-nant human growth hor-mone. And while growth disparities increase with time on dialysis, the preva-lence of rhGH treatment is unchanged. Patients with-out Medicare as primary payor are less likely than those with primary Medicare coverage to receive rhGH.

Predictors of rhGH therapy show areas of concern. Non-white patients, for example, are less likely than white children to be treated, while those who see a pe-diatric nephrologist are 2.5 times more likely to receive therapy than those who do not. These findings suggest that children are not receiving access to recommended care, which is FDA-approved and is covered by most insurers. This area clearly needs further consideration, since children with kidney disease are already at a substantial disadvantage in terms of their growth and

development.The most striking find-

ings related to pediatric pa-tients center on the lack of improvement in patient sur-vival over the past decade. This is a central concern, as it suggests that care of this population is insufficient. Members of the pediatric kidney disease community need to focus on developing new approaches in treating this most vulnerable popu-lation. ½

figure 8.1 pediatric hemodialysis patients, 2002: ESRD CPM data.

Std height quintiles, U.S. general pediatric population

Lowest quintile Middle quintile Highest quintile

Hei

gh

t d

istr

ibu

tio

n U

.S. p

edia

tric

HD

pts

0

20

40

60

80

Lin

e: %

wit

h rh

GH

pre

scri

pti

on

0

10

20

30

40

highlightscontentspatient characteristics at initiation 176 information from the ME form modal-ity 178 patient counts & rates transplant vascular access 179 at initiation

infections anemia & overshooting of target hemoglobin levels 180� hemoglo-bin levels IV iron hemoglobin overshooting preventive care 182 vaccinations lipid monitoring infectious complications 183 infectious hospitalizations overall hospitalization & mortality 184 hospital admissions & days survival mortality cause-specific hospitalization & mortality 186 CVD infections growth & development 188 pediatric patients below standardized height odds of receiving human growth hormone

figure 8.1 Sixty-five percent of children with ESRD have a growth rate in the lowest one-fifth of the general population, yet only 30 percent of these children receive recombinant human growth hormone.� fig-ure 8.12 Body mass indices at initiation are highest in African Ameri-cans, at 24.�1 kg/m2 in 2006 compared to 22.�2 and 21.�1 in whites and individuals of other races, respectively.� figures 8.26–28 overshooting of hemoglobin levels in children is comparable to that reported in the adult population.� figure 8.37 No progress has been made in five-year survival among pediatric ESRD patients.�

8.1 Standard height quintiles in the U.S. general pediatric population, & percent with prescription for rhGH

1758

Page 4: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

0-9 10-14 15-19

Perc

ent

rece

ivin

g E

SA (p

re-E

SRD

)

0

10

20

30

40

50Age

White Af Am Other Other

Other

Other

Other

Other

GN Sec. GN CK*

Race Primary diagnosis

0-9 10-14 15-19

Perc

ent

seei

ng

a n

eph

rolo

gis

t

0

20

40

60

80Age

White Af Am GN Sec. GN CK*

Race Primary diagnosis

0-9 10-14 15-19

Per

cen

t se

ein

g a

kid

ney

die

titi

an

0

10

20

30

40

50Age

White Af Am GN Sec. GN CK*

Race Primary diagnosis

0-9 10-14 15-19

Mea

n H

bA

1c (p

erce

nt)

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5Age

White Af Am GN Sec. GN CK*

Race Primary diagnosis

0-9 10-14 15-19

Fasting lipoproteinscreening indicated

RecommendedHbA1c level: ≤7.0%

Mea

n t

ota

l ch

ole

ster

ol (m

g/d

l)

150

175

200

225

250Age

White Af Am GN Sec. GN CK*

Race Primary diagnosis

0-9 10-14 15-19

Mea

n t

rigl

ycer

ides

(mg

/dl)

150

200

250

300

350Age

White Af Am GN Sec. GN CK*

Race Primary diagnosis

Maximum levelrecommended

pediatric esrd

8.2 ESA use prior to initiation, by age, race, & primary diagnosis, 2005 incident ESRD patients age 0–19

patient characteristics at initiation

8.3 Nephrologist care prior to initiation, by age, race, & primary diagnosis, 2005 incident ESRD patients age 0–19

8.4 Kidney dietitian care prior to initiation, by age, race, & primary diagnosis, 2005 incident ESRD patients age 0–19

8.6 Total cholesterol at initiation, by age, race, & primary diagnosis, 2005 incident ESRD patients age 0–19 8.7 Triglycerides at initiation, by age, race, & primary

diagnosis, 2005 incident ESRD patients age 0–19

8.5 HbA1c levels at initiation, by age, race, & primary diagnosis, 2005 incident ESRD patients age 0–19

Information from the new Medical Evidence form

1768

Page 5: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

96-0001-05

96-0001-05

96-0001-05

Num

ber

of p

atie

nts

0

400

800

1,200

1,600

2,000

0-45-910-1415-19

GN

Sec. GN

CK*

All GN Sec GN CK*

Perc

ent o

f pat

ien

ts

0

10

20

30

40

50

601996-2000

2001-2005

All GN Sec GN CK*

Mea

n h

emog

lob

in (g

/dl)

8.0

8.5

9.0

9.5

10.0

10.51996-2000

2001-2005

All GN Sec GN CK*

eGFR

(ml/

min

/1.7

3 m

2 )

8

9

10

11

12

131996-2000

2001-2005

96 98 00 02 04 06

Mea

n B

MI (

kg/m

2 )

18

20

22

24

26

White

African American

Other

With the exception of children with GN, total cholesterol lev-els are normal to slightly above normal in all age, race, and diagno-sis groups (Figure 8.6). The mean level in children with GN is 247 mg/dl—33 and 80 mg/dl higher compared to those with second-ary GN or cystic kidney disease.

In 2005, the mean triglyceride level in children age 0–9 was 253 mg/dl—25 and 61 mg/dl higher, respectively, than for ages 10–14 and 15–19 (Figure 8.7). By race, individuals of “other” race have the highest mean levels, at 310.5 mg/dl, approximately 100 mg/dl higher than those found in whites and African Americans. Children with secondary GN have levels of 296 mg/dl, compared to 237 and 191 mg/dl in those with GN or cystic kidney disease.

Among patients age 14 and younger, counts of those with GN increased approximately 26 percent between 1996–2000 and 2001–2005; for those age 15–19, counts increased by 13.6 percent (Figure 8.8). For children with secondary GN, growth in patients counts of 13–15 percent between periods was evident for those age 0–9, and a larger rise of 50–59 percent in those age 10–19. For patients with cystic kidney disease, the population age 15–19 grew 57 percent, compared to 40, 35, and 36.5 percent, respec-tively, for ages 0–4, 5–9, and 10–14.

Overall, 34.5 percent of children received an ESA prior to ini-tiation during 1996–2000; this rose to 39.1 percent during 2001–2005 (Figure 8.9). Mean hemoglobin levels have grown from 9.1 to 9.7 g/dl overall, and children with cystic kidney disease have the highest level, though it is still well below the 11–12 g/dl K/DOQI target (Figure 8.10).

The mean eGFR increased from 10.0 to 11.1 ml/min/1.73 m2 overall in 2005, with increases from 9.5 to 10.5, 11.3 to 12.3, and

10.7 to 11.8, respectively, in patients with GN, secondary GN, and cystic kidney disease (Figure 8.11).

Body mass indices at initiation were highest in African Americans, at 24.1 kg/m2 in 2006 compared to 22.2 and 21.1 in whites and individuals of other races, respectively (Figure 8.12). ½

figures 8.2–7 incident ESRD patients age 0–19, 2005, with new (revised edition) Medical Evidence forms. figure 8.8 incident ESRD patients age 0–19, 1996–2005 combined. figures 8.9–12 incident ESRD patients age 0–19 with a first service date between May, 1995, & June, 2006; data from the Medical Evidence form; 1996–2005 combined. ½ *cystic/hereditary/congenital disease.

2007 USRDS Annual Data Reporthe revised Medical Evidence form, released in the spring of 2005, contains new fields on pre-ESRD care and biochemical markers.

In 2005, over 45 percent of patients 14 or younger received erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) before beginning therapy, com-pared to 30.2 percent of those age 15–19 (Figure 8.2). A higher proportion of white children receive ESAs than African Americans—41.9 versus 28.8 percent. And more than half of those with cystic kidney disease are given ESAs compared to 37.1 and 25.5 percent, respectively, of those with glo-merulonephritis (GN) or secondary GN.

In 2005, children age 0–9 were the most likely to be under the care of a nephrologist prior to ini-tiation (70 percent); by race, 63.2 percent of whites

and 58.9 percent of African Americans received care (Figure 8.3).Just over one-third of children age 14 and younger have a renal

dietitian prior to starting therapy (Figure 8.4). This type of care, too, is given to a greater proportion of white children than of Afri-can Americans—34 versus 26 percent. And 49 percent of children with cystic kidney disease receive dietary care compared to 34.3 and 14.4 percent, respectively, with GN or secondary GN.

Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels are similar across all pediatric age groups, ranging from 5.4 to 5.7 percent, and are higher in African Americans than in whites—6.0 versus 5.4 per-cent (Figure 8.5). By diagnosis, children with secondary GN have the lowest HbA1c levels, at 4.2 compared to 5.8 and 4.7 percent in those with GN or cystic kidney disease.

8.10 Mean hemoglobin at initiation incident ESRD patients age 0–19 8.11 Mean eGFR at initiation

incident ESRD patients age 0–19 8.12 Body mass index at initiation incident ESRD patients age 0–19

8.8 Patient counts, by age & primary diagnosis incident ESRD patients age 0–19 8.9 Patients receiving ESAs prior to

initiation incident ESRD patients age 0–19

T

More on patient characteristics at initiation: ei.9–17, Chapter Three, 10.8–20 (by provider).

1778

Page 6: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

Prevalent patients

0-9 10-14 15-19Perc

ent

info

rmed

of t

rans

pla

nt o

pti

ons

65

70

75

80

85Age

White Af Am Other GN Sec. GN CK*

Race Primary diagnosis

Cu

mu

lati

ve p

erce

nt

of p

atie

nts

0

20

40

60

80

100

Months0 12 24 36 48 60

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

1001996-20002001-2005

Age <5

Age 5-<10

Age 10+

0 12 24 36 48 60

White

African American

Other race

Rate

per

mill

ion

pop

ula

tio

n

0

5

10

15

80 84 88 92 96 00 04 0

20

40

60

80

100

Incident patients

Peritoneal dialysis

Peritoneal dialysis

Per

cen

t of

pat

ien

ts

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 600

20

40

60

80

100

Months after initiation

2000

2005

Nu

mb

er o

f pat

ien

ts

0

300

600

900

1,200

1,500

78 82 86 90 94 98 02 0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

Incident patients

Prevalent patients

Peritoneal dialysis

Transplant

Peritoneal dialysis

Hemodialysis

Transplant

Hemodialysis

Transplant

Transplant

Peritonealdialysis

Hemodialysis

Transplant

Peritonealdialysis

Hemodialysis

Hemodialysis

Transplant

Hemodialysis

pediatric esrdmodality & vascular access

8.13 Incident & prevalent counts, by modality ESRD patients age 0–19

8.16 Patients informed at initiation of transplant options, by age, race, & primary diagnosis incident ESRD patients age 0–19

8.17 Time to first transplant, by age & race incident ESRD patients age 0–19

8.14 Incident & prevalent rates, by modality ESRD patients age 0–19 8.15 Prevalent patient distribution, by

modality prevalent ESRD patients age 0–19

figures 8.13–14 incident & December 31 point prevalent ESRD patients, age 0–19. figure 8.15 December 31 point prevalent ESRD patients, age 0–19. figures 8.16 & 8.18 incident patients, age 0–19, 2005, with new (revised edition) Medi-cal Evidence forms. figure 8.17 incident ESRD patients, age 0–19, receiving a transplant between January 1, 1996, & December 31, 2005 (n=11,307). Patients included if ESRD initiation occurs at age 19 or younger, even if transplanta-tion occurs after age 19. figure 8.19 incident hemodialysis patients, 2000–2005; ESRD CPM data. Year represents incident year; access represents the access used at the time of data collection. figure 8.20� incident hemodialysis patients age 0–19, in both the USRDS & ESRD CPM datasets & with Medicare as primary payor on January 1 of the year following incidence. Access obtained from CPM data; represents the current access as reported during Octo-ber–December of the incident year. Infection & sepsis from Medicare claims during the calendar year following incidence; infection refers to an infection of the vascular access/internal device. figure 8.21 hemodialysis patients: same as in Figure 8.20. Peritoneal dialysis patients: incident peritoneal dialysis patients, age 0–19, 1999–2004 combined, with Medicare as primary payor on day 91. Infection/sepsis identified during the one-year period after day 91. Infection represents infection of the peritoneal dialysis catheter. ½ *cystic/hereditary/congenital disease.

1788

Page 7: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

Yes No

Perc

ent

of p

atie

nts

0

20

40

60

80Neph. pre-ESRD

0-9 10-14 15-19

AV fistulaAV graft Catheter Other

GN Sec. GN CK*

Age Primary diagnosis

Perc

ento

fpat

ien

ts

0

20

40

60

80

100

Infection Sepsis

Even

ts p

er 1

00 p

atie

nt

year

s

0

50

100

150

200Arteriovenous fistulas Arteriovenous grafts

Infection Sepsis Infection Sepsis

Catheters

Days0 60 120 180 240 300 360

Even

t-fr

ee p

rob

abili

ty

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0AV fistula

Catheter

PD access

1999-20012002-2004

1999-2001 2002-20041999-2001 2002-2004

Age: <13 13+

Catheter AV fistula AV graft

2007 USRDS Annual Data Report

8.18 Vascular access use at initiation, by pre-ESRD nephrologist care, age, & primary diagnosis incident hemodialysis patients age 0–19, 2005

8.20 Dialysis access infectious events incident hemodialysis patients age 0–19 8.21 Time to first infection/sepsis incident

dialysis patients age 0–19, 1999–2004

odality choices for the incident pedi-atric population have changed dra-matically since 1978 (Figure 8.13). The number of children placed on perito-neal dialysis, for example, rose from 52 in 1980 to 314 in 1990, while trans-plant counts in 1990 were nearly three times higher than in 1980, at 175 ver-sus 60. Peritoneal dialysis and trans-plant counts continue to rise, and since 1990 have increased 28 and 34 per-cent, respectively. These increases are reflected in the prevalent population—in 2005 the number of children with a transplant was 5,104, four times higher than the number on hemodialysis.

Between 1995 and 2005, incident and prevalent rates rose 7 and 9 percent for hemodialysis, and fell 8 and 5 percent for peri-toneal dialysis (Figure 8.14). The transplant rate fell 3.9 percent in incident patients, but grew 24 percent among prevalent patients.

Among pediatric ESRD patients prevalent in 2005, the per-centage with a transplant rose from 24.9 at initiation to nearly 86 percent at five years; 10 percent were on hemodialysis at this later time, and just 4.1 percent were being treated with peritoneal dialysis (Figure 8.15). Patient distribution by modality in the five years after beginning therapy has changed little since 2000. In

2005, the percentage of patients on peritoneal dialysis at 18 and 24 months was slightly higher than in 2000, but this difference disappeared in later months.

In 2005, 71–75 percent of pediatric patients were informed of their transplant options prior to initiating ESRD therapy (Figure 8.16). By race, 71 percent of whites received information, com-pared to 82 percent of African Americans. Children with a pri-mary diagnosis of glomerulonephritis are the most likely to be informed, at 82 percent.

Time to first transplant appears to be increasing. During 1996–2000, 75 percent of children age ten or younger and 90.3 percent of those older than ten received a transplant within five years of initiation; during 2001–2005, the numbers fell to 70 and 79 percent, respectively (Figure 8.17).

Children under a nephrologist’s care prior to ESRD are far less likely to start hemodialysis with a catheter compared to those without such care, at 38.5 versus 70 percent (Figure 8.18). The proportion with catheters increases with age, from 30.4 per-cent in patients age 0–9 to 64.1 in those age 15–19.

The proportion of pediatric patients using catheters grew by 10 percent between 1999–2001 and 2002–2004, while infectious event rates increased by 27 percent; fistulas and graft infectious event rates were approximately 60 percent lower. At six months post-initiation, only 5 percent of patients with a fistula suffer an access infection compared to 36 percent of those with a catheter (Figures 8.19–21). ½

8.19 Vascular access at initiation, by age incident hemodialysis patients age 0–19; ESRD CPM data

MMore on modality: p.a, Chapter Four. On vascular access: p.11–13, hp.11–13, 5.51–57, 10.11 & 10.25–26 (by provider), 11.30–36 (costs).

1798

Page 8: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

0-910-1415-1920+

<10

10-19

20+

12+

10-<11

9-<10

12+

10-<11

9-<10

12+

10-<11

9-<10

9-<1010-<11

12+

96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05

Per

cen

t of

pat

ien

ts

0

20

40

60

80

100Age (hemodialysis only)

96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05

Male Female

Gender (ages 0-19; hemodialysis only)

96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05

Hemodialysis

Peritoneal dialysis

Modality (ages 0-19)

91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05

Wee

kly

EPO

do

se (u

nit

s, in

1,0

00s)

0

4

8

12

16

20

24Mean hemoglobin Weekly EPO dose

91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05

Hem

og

lob

in (g

/dl)

8

9

10

11

12

91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 0

20

40

60

80

100

11-<12

<9

Age <10 10-19

91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05

11-<12

<9

91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05

11-<12

20+

Perc

ent

of p

atie

nts

<9

91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05

Perc

ent

of p

atie

nts

0

20

40

60

80

100

11-<12

<9

nibolgomeh naeM

91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05

Mea

n w

eekl

y EP

O d

ose

( in

1,0

00s

of u

nit

s)

0

5

10

15

20

Hem

og

lob

in (g

/dl)

8.5

9.5

10.5

11.5

12.5

Hemoglobin

EPO dose

esod OPE & nibolgomeH

pediatric esrdanemia & overshooting of target hemoglobin levels

8.22 Patient distribution by mean quarterly hemoglobin (g/dl), & trends in mean monthly hemoglobin & weekly EPO dose period prevalent dialysis patients age 0–19

8.23 Patient distribution by mean quarterly hemoglobin (g/dl) & age period prevalent dialysis patients

8.24 Mean monthly hemoglobin & weekly EPO dose, by age period prevalent dialysis patients

8.25 Patients receiving IV iron, by age, gender, & modality period prevalent dialysis patients

1808

Page 9: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

Months after initiation1 2 3 4 5 6

Cu

mu

lati

ve p

rob

abili

ty

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.012.0

12.5

13.0

13.5

14.0

Months after initiation

1 2 3 4 5 6

Cu

mu

lati

ve p

rob

abili

ty

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.011+

12+

13+

14+

Hemoglobin level (g/dl)>12 13+ 14+

Per

cen

t of

pat

ien

ts

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 months 1 month 2 months 3+ months

2007 USRDS Annual Data Report

8.28 Probability of achieving hemoglobin levels ≥ 11 g/dl incident dialysis pts age 0–198.27 Time at hemoglobin levels of ≥ 12 g/dl

point prevalent dialysis pts age 0–19, 20058.26 Prob. of hgb ≥ 12 g/dl after achieving hgb ≥ 11 g/dl incident dialysis pts age 0–19

emoglobin levels in children have improved since 1991, and in 2005 more than 75 percent had a mean quarterly hemoglobin meeting or exceeding the K/DOQI target of 11–12 g/dl (Fig-ure 8.22). This increase is certainly a significant achievement, but also demonstrates that addi-tional efforts are needed in order to approach 100 percent K/DOQI compliance.

The rise in hemoglobin is attributable to a major rise in mean weekly EPO dose over time. In January, 1991, for instance, the mean dose was 5,517 units per week. This rose to 11,705 units at the end of 1995, and, as of December, 2005, was 16,628 units—more than a three-fold increase over the entire period.

Levels of hemoglobin differ across pediatric age groups and when compared to adult levels (Figure 8.23). At the end of 2005, 70.0 percent of children age ten and younger met or exceeded the K/DOQI target, compared to 76 and 85 per-cent, respectively, of those age 10–19 and adults age 20 and older (Figures 10.23–24). One item of interest is the overall trend of EPO dose versus actual hemoglobin level over time. The average dose in children age 10 and younger, for instance, has histori-cally been lower than the doses used in children age 10–19 and in adults. This is in part related to size, but it is associated with a slower rise in hemoglobin levels toward the K/DOQI target. Once achieved, however, it appears that the target hemoglobin is maintained with less EPO in this younger group, as evidenced by

Ha 7 percent decrease in weekly EPO dose since 2000 compared to 11 and 24 percent growth in children age 10–19 and adults 20 and older.

In the pediatric population, older children are more likely to receive iron during the year. In 2005, nearly 80 percent of chil-dren age 15–19 were given iron compared to 65.4, 70.3, and 92.0 percent, respectively, of children age 0–9, those age 10–14, and adults (Figure 8.25). Slightly more males than females receive iron—79.2 versus 74.4 percent—and the proportion of children on hemodialysis receiving iron is much higher than in those on peritoneal dialysis, at 77.1 and 17.8 percent, respectively.

Figures 8.26–28 show that overshooting of hemoglobin levels in children is comparable to that reported in adults. While the absolute levels are slightly lower—children tend to achieve lower hemoglobin levels than adults—overshooting is clearly present, and the time exceeding a target of 12 g/dl is similar to that found in adults. ½

figures 8.22–24 period prevalent dialysis patients (in Figure 8.22, age 0–19) with EPO claims. Sand diagrams: distribution of patients by hemoglobin group represents quarterly averages; line graphs: hemoglobin levels represent monthly averages, & EPO doses represent monthly averages of weekly doses. EPO doses are adjusted for inpatient hospital days. figure 8.25 period prevalent dialysis patients who remain alive, on their current modality, & with Medicare as primary payor for the entire calendar year. figure 8.26 dialysis patients, age 0–19, incident between July 1, 2001, & June 30, 2005, with Medicare as primary payor, receiving EPO during the first six months after day 91, & achieving a hemoglobin of 11+ g/dl during that period; probabilities calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. figure 8.27 point prevalent dialysis patients, age 0–19, 2005, with Medicare as primary payor, & receiving EPO in each of the first six months after January 1, 2005. figure 8.28 dialysis patients, age 0–19, incident between July 1, 2001, & June 30, 2005, with Medicare as primary payor, & receiving EPO during the first six months after day 91.

More on anemia & overshooting: ei.4–8, 5.2–18, 10.27–28 (by provider).

1818

Page 10: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

All HD PD Tx

Perc

ent

of p

atie

nts

vac

cin

ated

0

10

20

30

40

501998-2001

2002-2005

All HD PD Tx All HD PD Tx

White Other raceAfrican American

All HD PD Tx

Perc

ent

of p

atie

nts

vac

cin

ated

0

5

10

151998-1999 & 2000-2001

2002-2003 & 2004-2005

All HD PD Tx All HD PD Tx

White Other raceAfrican American

All HD PD Tx

Perc

ent

of p

atie

nts

vac

cin

ated

0

5

10

15

201998-2001

2002-2005

All HD PD Tx All HD PD Tx

White Other raceAfrican American

All HD PD Tx

Perc

ent o

f pat

ien

ts te

sted

0

20

40

60

801998-2001

2002-2005

All HD PD Tx All HD PD Tx

White Other raceAfrican American

pediatric esrdpreventive care & infectious complications

8.29 Influenza vaccinations, by race point prevalent ESRD patients age 0–19 8.30 Pneumococcal pneumonia vaccinations,

by race point prevalent ESRD patients age 0–19

8.31 Hepatitis B vaccinations, by race point prevalent ESRD patients age 0–19 8.32 Lipid monitoring, by race point

prevalent ESRD patients age 0–19

accinations against influenza in pediatric ESRD patients increased noticeably between the 1998–2001 and 2002–2005 periods (Figure 8.29). In whites, for example, the proportion of patients receiving the vaccine rose from 18.2 percent in the early period to 30.1 percent in the latter period. A similar increase—from 17.8 to

28.4 percent—was evident for African Americans. Pediatric patients on hemodialysis are more likely than peritoneal dialysis or transplant patients to be vaccinated, regardless of race. During 2002–2005,

37.5 percent of white hemodialysis patients were vaccinated compared to 32.5 percent of peritoneal patients and 24.6 percent of those with a function-ing graft. Among African Americans, 33.1 percent of hemodialysis patients received a vaccination, com-

pared to 27.9 and 22.1 percent.The proportion of pediatric ESRD patients who receive pneu-

mococcal pneumonia vaccinations has increased, but continues to remain alarmingly low (Figure 8.30). In the latter study period

of 2002–2003 and 2004–2005, for instance, only 7.8 percent of white patients and 7.6 percent of African American patients received a vaccination. By modality, those on hemodialysis are the most likely to be vaccinated against pneumonia, at 11.4 and 9.9 percent of white and African American patients, respectively. In the peritoneal dialysis population these numbers fall to 10.3 and 8.2 percent, and in the transplant population they are even lower, at 4.1 and 3.8 percent.

Between 1998–2001 and 2002–2005, vaccinations against hepatitis B in the pediatric ESRD population grew only slightly (Figure 8.31). Overall, only 6.9 percent of white patients, and 9.0 percent of African Americans, were vaccinated in the latter period. By modality, hemodialysis patients are again more likely to be vaccinated than their counterparts on peritoneal dialysis or with a functioning graft. In 2002–2005, 15.9 percent of white children on hemodialysis received the vaccine compared to 8.3 and 1.8 percent, respectively, of those on peritoneal dialysis or with a transplant. And among African Americans, 15.2 percent of those on hemodialysis are vaccinated, compared to 7.3 and 2.3 percent.

V

1828

Page 11: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

Cum

ula

tive

per

cen

t

0

20

40

60

801995-1998

1999-2002

Pediatric patients: any infection Internal devicePneumonia

All HD PD Tx0

20

40

60

80

All HD PD Tx All HD PD

Adult patients

2007 USRDS Annual Data Report

8.33 Cumulative incidence of infectious hospitalizations at 36 months incident dialysis & transplant patients

Lipid testing increased across races and modalities between the 1998–2001 and 2002–2005 study periods (Figure 8.32). In the latter period, 56.2 percent of white pediatric patients were tested compared to 48.6 percent of African Americans. In contrast to vaccination rates, rates of lipid testing are highest among children with a functioning graft, at 61.2 and 57.1 percent, respectively, in the white and African American populations. Among patients on hemodialysis, rates are 49.7 and 44.9 percent; and they are 52.1 and 42.1 percent for children treated with peritoneal dialysis.

Between the 1995–1998 and 1999–2002 periods, the cumula-tive incidence of infectious hospitalizations at 36 months after ESRD initiation increased in both children and adults (Figure 8.33). In the earlier period, 45.2 percent of children and 53.7 per-cent of adults were hospitalized for any infection, compared to 52.8 and 56.2 percent, respectively, in the later years. Children and adults on peritoneal dialysis are most likely to be hospi-talized—58.6 and 56.5 percent, respectively, in the most recent period—compared to 49.9 and 56.3 percent of those on hemo-dialysis, and to 44.8 and 41.0 percent of patients with a trans-plant. The incidence of hospitalization for pneumonia, while low

in both populations, increased slightly in pediatric patients but was virtually unchanged in adults.

Between study periods, the cumulative incidence of hospital-ization for an infection due to internal device grew from 21.0 to 31.3 percent in children and from 18.6 to 23.7 percent in adults. By modality, an increase from 22.2 to 30.4 percent occurred in chil-dren on hemodialysis, and from 18.6 to 23.5 percent in their adult counterparts. In the peritoneal dialysis population, growth was 19.3–34.3 percent in children and 20.2–29.3 percent in adults. ½

figure 8.29 point prevalent ESRD pts, 1998–2005, age 0–19 prior to January 1 of each year, & initiating therapy 90 days prior to September 1 & living through December 31 of each year; includes only pts with Medicare inpatient/outpatient & physician/supplier primary payor coverage. Vaccinations tracked between September 1 & December 31. figure 8.30� point prevalent ESRD pts with 90-day rule, age 0–19 prior to January 1 of the first year of the two-year study period, & living through Decem-ber 31 of the second year; includes only pts with inpatient/outpatient & physician/supplier primary payor coverage during the entire period. Vaccinations tracked in each study period. Age calculated at end of second year. figures 8.31–32 point preva-lent ESRD pts, 1998–2005, with 90-day rule, age 0–19 prior to January 1 & living through December 31 of each year; includes only pts with inpatient/outpatient & physician/supplier primary payor coverage during each year. Vaccinations & lipid testing tracked in each year. figure 8.33 incident dialysis & first-time, kidney-only transplant pts with Medicare as primary payor, 1995–2002 combined.

More on preventive care: p.19, hp.21–22, 1.11–14, 5.19–44, 7.67–75, 10.23–24 & 10.44–49, 11.25–29. On infectious hospitalizations: p.22, 6.5–7 & 6.10.

1838

Page 12: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Glomerulonephritis Cystic/hereditary/congenital Other All

Admissions per patient year at risk

Hospital days per patient year at risk

93 95 97 99 01 03 050

5

10

15

20

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Glomerulonephritis Cystic/hereditary/congenital Other All

Admissions per patient year at risk

Hospital days per patient year at risk

93 95 97 99 01 03 054

5

6

7

8

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

HemodialysisPeritoneal dialysisAll (includes pts with unknowndialysis modality & those whoswitch modalities)

Admissions per patient year at risk

Hospital days per patient year at risk

93 95 97 99 01 03 055

10

15

20

pediatric esrdoverall hospitalization & mortality

8.34 by primary diagnosis: dialysis period prevalent dialysis patients age 0–19 8.35 by primary diagnosis: transplant

period prevalent transplant patients age 0–19 8.36 by modality: dialysis period prevalent dialysis patients age 0–19

ittle change occurred between 1993 and 2005 in the rate of hospital admissions for children on dialy-sis (Figure 8.34). Rates overall increased less than 1 percent, with only slight changes of 2.33, -0.93, and 1.34 percent, respectively for primary diagno-ses of glomerulonephritis (GN), cystic/hereditary disease, and other diagnoses. Hospital days have fallen 11 percent overall, and 17.1 and 21.7 percent in children with GN or cystic/hereditary disease.

In contrast to admissions in dialysis patients, those for transplant patients grew 10 percent over-all (Figure 8.35). The largest increase occurred in patients with GN, at 15.4 percent compared to 10.6 and 6.7 percent, respectively, in those with cystic/hereditary disease or another diagnosis. Hospital days per patient year have decreased nearly 4 per-

cent overall, with the largest change of 9.2 percent occurring in children with cystic/hereditary disease. Rates have increased by nearly 3 percent in children with GN.

By modality, admission rates for hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients are similar, at 2.03 and 1.95 per patient year in 2005 (Figure 8.36). Hospital days overall have fallen by 11.1 per-cent since 1993, with decreases of 13.3 and 7.7 percent, respectively, in the hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis populations.

No progress has been made in five-year survival among pedi-atric ESRD patients (Figure 8.37). Indeed, in some populations, the probability of a child surviving the first five years of ther-

apy fell slightly between the 1991–1995 and 1996–2000 periods. Patients with a transplant continue to have the highest survival probabilities—0.93 in the latter period, compared to 0.78 and 0.82 for those treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

By primary diagnosis, pediatric dialysis patients with glo-merulonephritis continue to have the best outcomes, with a five-year survival probability of 0.86 on hemodialysis and 0.89 on peritoneal dialysis. Probabilities are among the lowest for chil-dren with secondary glomerulonephritis or vasculitis, at 0.77 and 0.75, respectively.

Since 1991, adjusted mortality rates in prevalent pediatric patients have increased 5 percent, to 26.6 per million popula-tion in 2005 (Figure 8.38). Rates are highest for hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients, at 57.8 and 42.8, respectively. In the transplant population, mortality rates are three- to four-fold lower than for the two dialysis modalities, demonstrating the advantages of this mode of ESRD therapy. ½

figures 8.34–36 period prevalent ESRD patients. ESRD patients age 0–19, 2001, used as reference cohort. ½ figures 8.34–35 adjusted for gender & race; “all” group also adjusted for primary diagnosis. figure 8.36 adjusted for gender, race, & primary diagnosis. “All” group includes patients with unknown dialysis & those who switch modalities, while hemodialysis & peritoneal dialysis groups are censored at modality change. figure 8.37 incident ESRD patients, age 0–19. All probabilities are adjusted for age, gender, & race; overall probabilities are also adjusted for primary diagnosis. ESRD patients age 0–19, 1996–1997 combined, used as reference cohort. Dialysis patients are followed from day 90 after initiation; transplant patients are followed from the transplant date. figure 8.38 period prevalent ESRD patients, age 0–19; adjusted for age, gender, & race. ESRD patients age 0–19, 2001, used as refer-ence cohort.

Adjusted hospital admissions & days

L

1848

Page 13: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

Surv

ival

pro

bab

ility

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Dial. (5 yr. survival probability: 0.82)Hemodialysis (0.79) Peritoneal dialysis (0.82) Transplant (0.93) All (0.89)

1991-1995: All patients, by modality Hemodialysis patients, by primary diagnosis

GN (0.89)Sec GN/vasculitis (0.76)Cystic/hereditary/cong. (0.81)Other (0.73)All (0.79)

GN (0.84)Sec GN/vasculitis (0.75)Cystic/hereditary/cong. (0.90)Other (0.75) All (0.82)

Peritoneal dialysis patients, by primary diagnosis

0 12 24 36 48 600.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Dial. (5 yr. survival probability: 0.81)Hemodialysis (0.78) Peritoneal dialysis (0.82) Transplant (0.93) All (0.89)

Months after initiation0 12 24 36 48 60

GN (0.86)Sec GN/vasculitis (0.77)Cystic/hereditary/congenital (0.77)Other (0.72)All (0.78)

0 12 24 36 48 60

GN (0.89)Sec GN/vasculitis (0.75)Cystic/hereditary/congenital (0.85)Other (0.76) All (0.82)

1996-2000

91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05

Dea

ths

per

1,0

00 p

atie

nt

year

s at

ris

k

0

20

40

60

80

Dialysis Hemodialysis

Peritoneal dialysis

Transplant

All

2007 USRDS Annual Data Report

8.37 Adjusted five-year survival, by modality & primary diagnosis incident ESRD patients age 0–19

8.38 Adjusted mortality, by modality period prevalent ESRD patients age 0–19

More on hospitalization & mortality: p.20–25, Emerging Issues chapter, Chapter Six, 8.39–43 (next page).

1858

Page 14: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

All hospitalizations

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

93 95 97 99 01 03 050.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2.0

Cardiovascular disease

Infection

Other

Ad

mis

sio

ns

per

pat

ien

t ye

ar

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

0-910-19

20+All (0-19)

All hospitalizations

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

93 95 97 99 01 03 050.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

Cardiovascular disease

Infection

Other

Ad

mis

sio

ns

per

pat

ien

t ye

ar

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Male Female

All hospitalizations

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

93 95 97 99 01 03 050.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2.0

Cardiovascular disease

Infection

Other

Ad

mis

sio

ns

per

pat

ien

t ye

ar

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

WhiteAfrican American

Other raceHispanic

pediatric esrdcause-specific hospitalization & mortality

8.39 by age period prevalent dialysis patients 8.40 by gender period prevalent

dialysis patients age 0–19 8.41 by race/ethnicity period prevalent dialysis patients age 0–19

Adjusted cause-specific hospital admissions

1868

Page 15: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

All

0

30

60

90

120

150

0

10

20

30

40

91 93 95 97 99 01 03 050

25

50

75

100

Cardiovascular disease

Infection

Other

Dea

ths

per

1,0

00 p

atie

nt

year

s at

ris

k0

50

100

150

200

250

All 0-19

0-9

10-19

20+

All

0

10

20

30

40

0

5

10

15

20

91 93 95 97 99 01 03 050

10

20

30

40

Cardiovascular disease

Infection

Other

Dea

ths

per

1,0

00 p

atie

nt

year

s at

risk

0

20

40

60

80

Male Female

n comparison to those of adults, all-cause hospital admission rates in 2005 were 14 percent higher in children—at 2.0 versus 1.8 per patient year at risk (Figure 8.39). By age, admissions are highest in children age 0–9, at 2.9 compared to 1.9 for ages 10–19. Cardiovas-cular admissions are 13.5 percent lower in children than in adults, but admissions across age groups are on the rise. And hospitaliza-tions for infection are noticeably higher in children than adults—46 percent in 2005.

Overall admissions in pedi-atric patients fell 2.9 percent in males between 1993 and 2005, and grew 4.9 percent in females (Figure 8.40). Car-diovascular admissions have changed in both boys and girls, with growth of 53.6 and 64.4 percent, respectively—a some-what alarming development given the age of these patients. In 2005, admis-sion rates in all categories were lower in males compared to females, by 13.6, 17.4, 14.4, and 11.5 percent for all-cause admissions and those related to cardio-vascular disease, infection, and other causes, respectively.

By race and ethnicity, all-cause admissions increased 5.7 percent in white pediatric patients between 1993 and 2005, and 2.6 percent in Hispan-ics; rates fell, in contrast, 3.1 percent in African Americans and 32 percent in patients of other races (Figure 8.41). Admissions for cardiovascular disease show a 75 percent increase in white patients, compared to 35.7 percent in African Americans. Admissions for infections rose the most in Hispanic and African American patients, at 41 and 21 percent, while the increase among white children was a more modest 7.6 percent. And in 2005, the rates of admission for infection in Afri-can Americans were 25.8, 73.1, and 42.3 percent higher, respectively, than those found in whites, patients of other races, and Hispanics.

All-cause and cause-specific mortality rates by age are notice-ably similar across pediatric age groups, but differ significantly from those in the adult population (Figure 8.42). In 2005, for example, the mortality rate for all causes was 55.3 per 1,000 patient years in children, compared to 226.6 in adults—a four-fold difference. Differences in cause-specific rates are apparent as well. The 2005 rate of cardiovascular mortality was 23.4 among children and 102.1 among adults; rates of infectious mortality were 8.5 and 29.9, respectively. Cardiovascular mortality among pediatric patients, moreover, has been rising, from 17.7 deaths per 1,000 patient years at risk in 1991 to 23.4 in 2005.

2007 USRDS Annual Data Report

8.42 by age period prevalent dialysis patients 8.43 by gender period prevalent

dialysis patients age 0–19

Adjusted cause-specific mortality

Girls tend to have higher mortality rates than boys—in 2005, 28 percent overall, 20 percent for cardiovascular mortality, and 32 percent for infectious mortality (Figure 8.43). ½

figures 8.39–41 ESRD patients age 0–19, 2001, used as reference cohort. Cause-spe-cific categories determined from principal ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. ½ figure 8.39 period prevalent dialysis patients; adjusted for gender, race, & primary diag-nosis. figure 8.40� period prevalent dialysis patients, age 0–19; adjusted for race & primary diagnosis. figure 8.41 period prevalent dialysis patients, age 0–19; adjusted for gender & primary diagnosis. figure 8.42 period prevalent dialysis patients. Rates for all patients age 0–19, & 20 & older, adjusted for age, gender, & race; rates for patients age 0–9 & 10–19 adjusted for gender & race. Reference cohorts: for patients age 0–19, 2001 ESRD patients age 0–19; for patients age 20 & older: 2001 ESRD patients age 20 & older. figure 8.43 period prevalent dialysis patients age 0–19, adjusted for age & race. ESRD patients age 0–19, 2001, used as reference cohort.

I

More on hospitalization & mortality: p.20–25, Emerging Issues chapter, Chapter Six, 8.34–38 (previous page).

1878

Page 16: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

median50.0

Gre

en: p

ct >

2 SD

s b

elo

w s

td. h

eig

ht

Blu

e: %

of >

2 SD

pre

scri

bed

rhG

H

Blu

e: %

of >

2 SD

pre

crib

ed r

hG

H

Gre

en: p

ct >

2 SD

s b

elo

w s

td. h

eig

ht

Blu

e : %

of >

2 SD

pre

scri

bed

rh

GH

Gre

en: p

ct >

2 SD

s b

elo

w s

td. h

eig

ht

Perc

enti

le

0

25

50

75

100

U.S. pediatricHD patients

StandardizedU.S. pediatric pop.

median6.73

All 0-9 10-13 14-18 Male Female White Af Am Oth Hisp.0

10

20

30

40

50

CK* Other cong. GN Focal GN0

10

20

30

40

50

<1 1-3 4+ Pediatric Adult MPP No MPP0

20

40

60

NephrologistVintage Insurance

pediatric esrdgrowth & development

8.44 Standardized height dist. in pediatric HD & general pediatric populations 8.45 Percent of children more than two standard deviations (SD) below standardized

height, by age, gender, & race/ethnicity hemodialysis patients age 0–19; ESRD CPM data

8.46 Pct. of children > two SD below std. ht, by prim. diag. HD pts 0–19; ESRD CPM data 8.47 Percent of children more than two SD below standardized height, by vintage, type

of nephrologist, & insurance coverage hemodialysis patients age 0–19: ESRD CPM data

t is not surprising that U.S. pediatric hemodialysis patients are of significantly shorter stature when compared to the general U.S. pediatric population (Figure 8.44). This phenomenon is relatively consistent across demographic groups, and is most prominent in patients who have been on dialysis for a longer period of time (Figures 8.45–47). Overall, 37.2 percent of pediatric hemodialysis patients are more than two standard deviations below the standard-ized mean for their age, gender, or race/ethnicity group. Of these, only 14.6 percent receive a prescription for recom-binant human growth hormone (rhGH). More males than females fall below the standardized height—39.0 versus 34.9 percent—and of these 16.1 and 12.6 percent, respec-tively, are prescribed rhGH. By race/ethnicity, 45.7 percent of Hispanics fall below the standardized mean height, and 19.6 percent of these receive rhGH. In whites and African

Americans, prescriptions are provided to 19.7 of 39.4 percent and only 8.9 of 34.7 percent, respectively.

Thirty-five percent of children below the standardized mean height have a diagnosis of cystic kidney disease, and only 4.3 per-cent of these children are prescribed rhGH. And of the nearly 39 percent with other congenital complications, 19.5 percent receive

a prescription, as do 14.9 of 29.9 percent with glomerulonephritis and 12.8 of 33.7 percent diagnosed with focal glomerulonephritis.

Children who have been on hemodialysis four or more years are the most likely to fall below the standardized mean height compared to those on the therapy for less than one year or for 1–3 years—58.2 versus 21.9 and 37.5 percent, respectively—and, of these, 27.9, 6.7, and 13.0 percent, respectively, are given a prescrip-tion for rhGH.

Nearly 41 percent of children with hemoglobins less than 11 g/dl are more than two standard deviations below the standard-ized mean height, and 15.4 percent of these patients received a prescription for rhGH (Figure 8.48). Comparatively, 34.6 per-cent of those with hemoglobins of 11–<12 g/dl and 35.8 percent with hemoglobins of 12 g/dl and above are below the standard mean height, and 14.2 and 13.6 percent, respectively, are pre-scribed rhGH.

Urea reduction ratios (URR) below 65 percent indicate inade-quate dialysis therapy. Of children with substandard URRs, nearly 26 percent are more than two standard deviations below the mean height, with 12 percent receiving an rhGH prescription (Figure 8.49). In those with URRs of 65 percent or greater, 39.3 percent are below standard height and 15.1 percent are prescribed rhGH.

I

1888

Page 17: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

Blu

e: %

of >

2 SD

pre

scri

be

rhG

H

Gre

en: p

ct >

2 SD

s b

elo

w s

td. h

eig

ht

Blu

e: %

of >

2 SD

pre

scri

bed

rh

GH

Gre

en: p

ct >

2 SD

s b

elo

w s

td. h

eig

ht

Blu

e: %

of >

2 SD

pre

scri

bed

rhG

H

Gre

en: p

ct >

2 SD

s b

elo

w s

td. h

eig

ht

Blu

e: %

of >

2 SD

pre

scri

bed

rh

GH

Gre

en: p

ct >

2 SD

s b

elow

std

. hei

ght

< 11 11-<12.5 12.5+0

10

20

30

40

50

Mean hemoglobin (g/dl)

1.2+ <65 65+0

10

20

30

40

50

Kt/V URR < lower limit ≥ lower limit0

10

20

30

40

50

<200 >300200-300

<8.8 >9.78.8-9.7

<3.5 >5.53.5-5.5

<30.8 >53.3530.8-53.35

0

20

40

60

80

PTH pg/ml Calcium mg/dl Phosphorus mg/dl Cal/phos product

2007 USRDS Annual Data Report

8.48 Hgb. in children > two SD below std. ht hemodialysis pts age 0–19; ESRD CPM data 8.49 Dial. adequacy in children > two SD

below std. ht HD pts 0–19; ESRD CPM data 8.50 Albumin in children > two SD below std. ht HD pts age 0–19; ESRD CPM data

8.51 Bone & mineral values in children more than two SD below standardized height hemodialysis patients age 0–19; ESRD CPM data

8.a Odds ratio of receiving a prescription for recombinant human growth hormone hemodialysis patients age 0–19; ESRD CPM data

Albumin levels do not appear to be associated with height differences (Fig-ure 8.50). In children with albumins below the test’s lower limit of normal, 38.8 percent are below the mean stan-dardized height compared to 36.8 per-cent of those with normal albumin levels. Of these, 11.1 and 15.3 percent, respec-tively, have a prescription for rhGH.

Low levels of calcium/phosphorous products appear to be most highly asso-ciated with abnormal height in children. In those with a level below 30.8, for example, 76.9 percent fall more than two standard deviations below the stan-dardized mean height, and of these 19.2 percent receive a prescription for rhGH. In patients with calcium/phosphorus products of 30.8–53.4 and 53.4 or greater, 33.6 and 38.7 percent are below the stan-dardized mean height; of these, 12.3 and 16.1 percent, respectively, receive rhGH.

Table 8.a shows that, among children who are two or more standard devia-tions below the standardized mean height, the adjusted odds of having a prescription for rhGH are significantly higher for younger, white patients with longer vintage and who are under the care of a pediatric nephrologist. ½

figures 8.44–51 & table 8.a ESRD CPM data, 2002. Heights standardized by age & gender using a CDC method & based on CDC 2000 growth charts. Figures 8.45–51 & Table 8.a include patients with a standardized height > two standard deviations below the mean. Biochemical data & information on rhGH prescriptions obtained from 2002 CPM supplement. Percentage with an rhGH prescrip-tion based on patients below the standardized height. Insurance status in Figure 8.47 obtained for patients also in the USRDS database. “MPP” refers to Medicare Primary Payor. ½ *cystic/hereditary/congenital disease.

Oddsratio CI p-value

Age <14 2.�402 1.�42–4.�08 0.�0012Female 0.�691 0.�42–1.�14 0.�1496Non-white 0.�521 0.�31–0.�87 0.�0127

Glomerulonephritis 10 cause of ESRD 0.�887 0.�43–1.�83 0.�7463Glomerulosclerosis 10 cause of ESRD 0.�667 0.�32–1.�40 0.�2848

Vintage 1–3 years 2.�204 1.�14–4.�28 0.�0196Vintage 4+ years 6.�653 3.�22–13.�8 < .�0001

Pediatric nephrologist 2.�521 1.�16–5.�50 0.�0202Medicare primary payor 1.�424 0.�84–2.�43 0.�1929

Hemoglobin 11–12.�5 g/dl 1.�163 0.�66–2.�06 0.�6036Hemoglobin 12.�5+ g/dl 0.�927 0.�45–1.�92 0.�8385

Kt/V > 1.�2 0.�954 0.�56–1.�62 0.�8612URR > 65% 0.�97 0.�44–2.�14 0.�9392

Albumin > lower limit 1.�772 0.�84–3.�73 0.�1315PTH, 200-300 pg/ml 1.�708 0.�85–3.�45 0.�1361Calcium 8.�8-9.�7 mg/dl 0.�789 0.�48–1.�31 0.�3594Phosphorus 3.�5–5.�5 mg/dl 1.�349 0.�56–3.�28 0.�5083Calcium x phosphorus, 3.�8–58.�4 1.�232 0.�51–2.�95 0.�6394

Reference groups: age 15–19, male, white, cystic kidney disease/other/unknown, adult nephrologist, non-Medicare primary payor, hemoglobin <11 g/dl, Kt/V ≤1.2, URR <65%, albumin <LL, PTH/calcium/phosphorus out of range.

1898

Page 18: Pediatric ESRD - usrds.org · formation on growth in the pediatric ESRD popula-tion, using data collected under the CMS ESRD Clin-ical Performance Measures (CPM) project. The median

pediatric esrd

patientcharacteristicsatinitiationfigure 8.2 In 2005, over 45 percent of patients 14 or younger received erythropoiesis stimulating agents before beginning therapy, com-pared to 30.�2 percent of those age 15–19.� figure 8.3 In 2005, children age 0–9 were the most likely to be under the care of a nephrologist prior to initiation.� figure 8.8 Among patients age 14 and younger, counts of those with glomerulonephritis increased approximately 25 percent between 1996–2000 and 2001–2005; for those age 15–19, counts rose 13.�6 percent.�

modalityfigure 8.14 Between 1995 and 2005, incident and prevalent rates in the pediatric ESRD population rose 7 and 9 percent, respectively, for hemodialysis, and fell 8 and 5 percent for peritoneal dialysis.� The transplant rate fell a slight 3.�9 percent in the incident population, but grew 24 percent among prevalent patients.� figure 8.16 In 2005, 71–75 percent of pediatric patients were informed of their transplant options prior to initiating ESRD therapy.� By race, 71 percent of whites received information, compared to 82 percent of African Americans.� figure 8.17 Time to first transplant appears to be increasing.� During 1996–2000, 75 percent of children age 10 or younger and 90.�3 per-cent over 10 received a transplant within five years of initiation; dur-ing 2001–2005, these numbers fell to 70 and 79 percent.�

vascularaccessfigure 8.18 Children under a nephrologist’s care prior to ESRD are far less likely to start hemodialysis with a catheter compared to those without such care, at 38.�5 versus 70 percent.� figures 8.19–21 Catheter use in pediatric patients grew 10 percent between 1999–2001 and 2002–2004, while infection rates for fistulas and grafts were 60 per-cent lower and 27 percent higher, respectively, than in those with catheters.� At six months post-initiation, only 5 percent of pediatric patients with a fistula suffered an access infection compared to 36 percent of those with a catheter.�

anemia&overshootingoftargethemoglobinlevelsfigure 8.22 Hemoglobin levels in children have improved since 1991, and in 2005 more than 75 percent had a hemoglobin meeting or exceeding the K/DOQI target of 11–12 g/dl.� figure 8.25 In the pediatric population, older children are more likely to receive iron during the year.� In 2005, nearly 80 percent of children age 15–19 were given iron compared to 65.�4, 70.�3, and 92.�0 percent, respectively, of children age 0–9, those age 10–14, and adults.� figures 8.26–28 Overshooting of hemoglobin levels in children is comparable to that reported in adults.� While the absolute levels are slightly lower—children tend to achieve lower hemoglobin levels than adults—overshooting is clearly present, and the time exceeding a target of 12 g/dl is similar to that found in adults.�

preventivecarefigures 8.29–31 Vaccinations against in-fluenza and pneumococcal pneumonia in pediatric ESRD patients increased between 1998–2001 and 2002–2005, but still remain quite low.� Rates of vaccination against hepatitis B grew only slightly.�

infectiouscomplicationsfigure 8.33 Between the 1995–1998 and 1999–2002 time periods, the cumulative incidence of infectious hospitalizations at 36 months after ESRD initiation increased in both children and adults.�

overallhospitalization&mortalityfigures 8.34 Little change occurred between 1993 and 2005 in the rate of hospital admissions for children on dialysis.� Rates overall in-creased less than 1 percent, with only slight changes of 2.�33, -0.�93, and 1.�34 percent, respectively, for primary diagnoses of glomerulo-nephritis, cystic/hereditary disease, and other diagnoses.� figure 8.37 No progress has been made in five-year survival among pediatric ESRD patients.� figure 8.38 Since 1991, adjusted mortality rates in pedi-atric patients have increased 5 percent, to 26.�6 per million popula-tion in 2005.�

cause-specifichospitalization&mortalityfigure 8.39 When compared to those of adults, all-cause hospital ad-mission rates were 14 percent higher in children in 2005—at 2.�01 versus 1.�76 per patient year at risk.� figure 8.40� Admissions for cardio-vascular disease increased 53.�6 percent in boys and 64.�4 percent in girls between 1993 and 2005, a somewhat alarming development because of the age of these individuals.� figure 8.43 Girls tend to have higher mortality rates than boys—in 2005, 28 percent overall, 20 percent for cardiovascular mortality, and 32 percent for infectious mortality.�

growth&developmentfigures 8.44–51 & table 8.a A high percentage of pediatric hemodialysis patients have short stature.� Less than 15 percent of these patients, however, are receiving recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH).� Pediatric hemodialysis patients are more likely to receive rhGH if they are younger, white, with a longer ESRD vintage, or are under the care of a pediatric nephrologist.�

chapter summary

1908