Top Banner
Salmon vs. Gold, Copper, and Molybdenum: The Debate over Resource Use in Bristol Bay, Alaska Naomi and Meg
17

pebble mine

Jan 22, 2018

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: pebble mine

Salmon vs. Gold, Copper, and Molybdenum: The Debate over Resource Use in Bristol

Bay, Alaska

Naomi and Meg

Page 2: pebble mine
Page 3: pebble mine
Page 4: pebble mine

Salmon Runs

∗ 2009-2010 an estimated 80 million salmon retuned to the region

∗ Salmon is the backbone of the Bristol Bay region, economically and culturally

Page 5: pebble mine

Salmon Industry

∗ Commercial∗ Employs 11, 572 people∗ Net worth $120 billion∗ Season: end of June-the 3rd week of July∗ Drift and setnet operations

∗ Sport fishing ∗ Largely catch and release

∗ Subsistence∗ Food for throughout the winter

Page 6: pebble mine

∗ Northern Dynasty Ltd. and Anglo American PLC

∗ Rio Tinto PLC holds 20% ownership in Northern Dynasty Ltd.∗ Kennecott Utah Copper-

visible from space

Pebble Limited Partnership

Page 7: pebble mine

∗ Copper, gold, molybdenum∗ Open-pit and underground∗ Estimated worth $100-$500 billion∗ 2,000 construction jobs∗ 1,000 highly-skilled and highly-paid jobs∗ Additional infrastructure :

∗ 86-mile road∗ Ore pipeline∗ Power-plant ∗ Port facility

Pebble Project

Page 8: pebble mine
Page 9: pebble mine

∗ Long term impacts on the health of salmon runs

∗ Initial economic gain, prior to environmental degradation

∗ Transition from subsistence lifestyle to more urban/modern

∗ Loss of voice

Fishermen

Page 10: pebble mine

∗ Economic benefits∗ Jobs∗ Tax revenue

∗ Renewable resources should not be traded for non-renewable resources

∗ Grave concerns about environmental impacts

Politicians

Page 11: pebble mine

∗ Ecosystem will be impacted∗ Committed to ensuring the success of

fisheries and mining∗ Fraser River, Canada

∗ Revenue contribution to the state∗ Year-round jobs, infrastructure

Pebble Representative

Page 12: pebble mine

∗ Geological-seismic activity∗ Fault with unknown location (5-18 miles)∗ Tailings dam (largest in the world)

∗ Ecological∗ Salmon olfactory sensors (spawning)∗ Water pollution with toxic waste

∗ Social∗ Dependence on salmon

∗ Cultural∗ Loss of identity for Native Populations

Concerns

Page 13: pebble mine

∗ Urge companies to adhere to “No Dirty Mining”∗ Ex: Tiffany & Co. “No Dirty Gold” campaign

∗ NEPA∗ Encourage public input against the mine∗ Potential lawsuit

∗ Contact legislators voicing concerns

Action Plan

Page 14: pebble mine
Page 15: pebble mine

∗ Alaskans need to ask themselves what is more important, sustainable salmon runs or a maximum of 50 years of revenue from a mine.

Page 16: pebble mine
Page 17: pebble mine

Questions?