Wireless Backhaul for 5G Dr. Manodha Gamage Founder/Managing Director ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd – Sri Lanka Consultant, Senior Lecturer & Trainer in Telecommunications www.isac.lk [email protected]
Wireless Backhaul for 5GDr. Manodha Gamage
Founder/Managing DirectorISaC (Pvt.) Ltd – Sri Lanka
Consultant, Senior Lecturer & Trainer in Telecommunicationswww.isac.lk
Dynamic Broadband NeedsMobile Users Demand:• Very high Speeds• Seamless access of Large Volumes of Data• More Real Time & Video Applications• Very High Reliability & Scalability• Reductions in COST
Most used MobileBroadband Technology
by 2020 will be LTE
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd 2Ericsson Mobility Report –June 2016
Evolution - 2G/3G RAN to 4G RAN Architecture
RNC/BSC
2G&3G
Operator Actions:• Small Cells (Heterogeneous Networks)
• All IP Backhaul
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd3
LTE removed RNC/BSC andmade eNodeB more intelligent
eNodeB
LTE, LTE-A& beyond
5G Use Case Categories
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd4
LTE X2 and S1 InterfacesX2 interface supports communication between eNBs for:• Handover, Self Organized NWs (SON),• LTE Advanced features to:
• Control Interference• Increase Capacity
X2 interface:• Saves backhaul BW• Minimizing
communication delay
S1 Interface:• Reliability• Scalability
Require Close Cooperationamong cell sites
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd 5
X2 interface:• Saves backhaul BW• Minimizing
communication delay
S1 Interface:• Reliability• Scalability
Requirements of Backhaul beyond 4G• Meet Ever increasing Capacity needs of RAN
• Lower Latency &Tight Synchronization (IEEE 1588v2 – PTP)
• Support Heterogeneous RAN with Small Cells (SON)
• Need to minimize TCO (may be SDN, NFV etc.)
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd6
Backhaul Technologies Depend on….• Urban or Rural? (Population density??)
• Applications– Real time? Video? Interactive ? etc.
– Critical? Availability very important?
– Volumes of traffic
• Affordability (TCO)
• Importance of synchronization of CELLs
• Country Specifics????
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd7
• Urban or Rural? (Population density??)
• Applications– Real time? Video? Interactive ? etc.
– Critical? Availability very important?
– Volumes of traffic
• Affordability (TCO)
• Importance of synchronization of CELLs
• Country Specifics????
Backhaul Requirements for Dense Urban Areas• For MACRO base stations
– Expected capacity few Gbit/s per base station
– Hop lengths to reach an existing fiber connected point expected to be short(200 meters to 1 km)
• Outdoor Small Cells (Micro & Pico)– Should handle none line of sight environments
– Capacity requirements from 10 – 100s of Mbit/s
– Hop lengths to reach an existing fiber connected point expected to be shorter(Compared to macro base station case)
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd
8
• For MACRO base stations– Expected capacity few Gbit/s per base station
– Hop lengths to reach an existing fiber connected point expected to be short(200 meters to 1 km)
• Outdoor Small Cells (Micro & Pico)– Should handle none line of sight environments
– Capacity requirements from 10 – 100s of Mbit/s
– Hop lengths to reach an existing fiber connected point expected to be shorter(Compared to macro base station case)
Source: NGMN Alliance
Backhaul Requirements for Rural Areas
• No focus on network densification
• Hop lengths expected to be quite long - up to 15 km
• Low Capacity Requirement– Several 100s of Mbit/s
BackhaulFiber?Microwave?Copper?
As of Today around the worldthe BackhaulCu – Almost Nothing (less than 5%)Fiber & Microwave = almost 50:50
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd9
BackhaulFiber?Microwave?Copper?
As of Today around the worldthe BackhaulCu – Almost Nothing (less than 5%)Fiber & Microwave = almost 50:50
Fiber the BestBut NOT Feasible everywhere• High cost• Delays in deployment
Cost of Backhaul – Fiber Vs Microwave
Achieving 99.999% availabilityusing fiber is very expensive
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd10
Requirements of Backhaul for Front-haul Links• Traditional backhaul link
– End user data bits & System Control Information transmitted to & from BaseStations
• Front-haul - Connection between central unit (BBU) & Remote Radio Unit(RRU),
– Digital samples of signal transmitted & received at antenna increases bitrate offront-haul (multiple times compared to a traditional backhaul)
– Statistical Multiplexing of multisector sites reduces capacity need of backhaul – ButFront haul capacity needs increase linearly with number of sectors
– Multiple RRUs could be connected to one BBU/Control – hence more capacityneeded
• Front-haul capacity requirements in the range of 1-10 Gbit/s per RRU
– For MULTI sector site – should multiply with number of sectors
• Some applications could add additional requirements– Low latency and tight synchronization
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd11
• Traditional backhaul link– End user data bits & System Control Information transmitted to & from Base
Stations
• Front-haul - Connection between central unit (BBU) & Remote Radio Unit(RRU),
– Digital samples of signal transmitted & received at antenna increases bitrate offront-haul (multiple times compared to a traditional backhaul)
– Statistical Multiplexing of multisector sites reduces capacity need of backhaul – ButFront haul capacity needs increase linearly with number of sectors
– Multiple RRUs could be connected to one BBU/Control – hence more capacityneeded
• Front-haul capacity requirements in the range of 1-10 Gbit/s per RRU
– For MULTI sector site – should multiply with number of sectors
• Some applications could add additional requirements– Low latency and tight synchronization
Base Stations with Remote Radio Head
12
BBU
RRH
Front-haul & Backhaul
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd13
Front-haul towards 5G
Current C-RAN
2Gbps
10Gbps
BBU Pool
14
Future C-RANBBU Pool
3Gbps
Fiber Vs Microwave
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd15
Microwave can be used when Data Rate is 3 - 4Gbps
Performance of Wireless Backbone• 4G & Beyond backhaul requires to meet SLA performance criteria
for– Availability
– Packet delay
– Jitter
– Packet loss.
• Operators require 99.999% availability(approximately 5 minutes of down time per year)
• LTE SLA can be easily achieved by– Fiber-based backhaul (but would be very expensive)
– Line-of-Sight (LoS) microwave backhaul
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd 16
• 4G & Beyond backhaul requires to meet SLA performance criteriafor– Availability
– Packet delay
– Jitter
– Packet loss.
• Operators require 99.999% availability(approximately 5 minutes of down time per year)
• LTE SLA can be easily achieved by– Fiber-based backhaul (but would be very expensive)
– Line-of-Sight (LoS) microwave backhaul
Low Frequency Bands (below 11 GHz)• Good propagation characteristics
• Support Long-haul hops(typically 10 - 50 km)– Can minimize sites
• Very important for mobilebroadband deployment– Rural Areas
– Fiber not technically oreconomically feasible.
• Useful for shorter hops withoutline-of-sight
• Ex: sub 6GHz, 11GHz
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd 17
• Good propagation characteristics
• Support Long-haul hops(typically 10 - 50 km)– Can minimize sites
• Very important for mobilebroadband deployment– Rural Areas
– Fiber not technically oreconomically feasible.
• Useful for shorter hops withoutline-of-sight
• Ex: sub 6GHz, 11GHz
Mid-Range Frequency Bands (11 to 23/30 GHz)• Supporting medium-haul links (typically 8 - 20 km)
• Examples– 13GHz, 18GHz, 23GHz, 24GHz
• Larger RF channel bandwidths possible
• Suitable for IMT and other terrestrial mobile broadband systems inpopulated areas outside dense city centers– Suburbs
– Industrial parks etc.
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd18
• Supporting medium-haul links (typically 8 - 20 km)
• Examples– 13GHz, 18GHz, 23GHz, 24GHz
• Larger RF channel bandwidths possible
• Suitable for IMT and other terrestrial mobile broadband systems inpopulated areas outside dense city centers– Suburbs
– Industrial parks etc.
High Frequency Bands (above 23GHz)• Short-haul links (typically < 8 km)
• Offers very large transmission capacity & suitable for– High traffic requirements
– Mobile broadband systems deployed in dense urban areas
• Backhaul traffic Small Cells– Range is small but spectrum reuse capability is high
• Example Bands– 26 & 28 GHz
– 38 & 42 GHz
– 59 - 64 GHz,
– 64 – 66GHz
– 71-76/81-86 GHz
– 92 – 95 GHz
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd19
• Short-haul links (typically < 8 km)
• Offers very large transmission capacity & suitable for– High traffic requirements
– Mobile broadband systems deployed in dense urban areas
• Backhaul traffic Small Cells– Range is small but spectrum reuse capability is high
• Example Bands– 26 & 28 GHz
– 38 & 42 GHz
– 59 - 64 GHz,
– 64 – 66GHz
– 71-76/81-86 GHz
– 92 – 95 GHz
Strategies for Regulators• Maximize use of Fiber in Backhaul
– Encourage Sharing
– Competition
– Open & fair pricing
– Incentives to install fiber in less attractive rural areas
• Best use of Wireless (Microwave) Backhaul– Revisit existing Policies & Pricing models
• Low Freq Bands
• Mid-Range Freq Band
• High Freq Bands
– Make sure the correct freq. band is used for the correct application
• Can you impose conditions instead a FEE ??
• Consider NFV, SDN etc.
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd20
• Maximize use of Fiber in Backhaul– Encourage Sharing
– Competition
– Open & fair pricing
– Incentives to install fiber in less attractive rural areas
• Best use of Wireless (Microwave) Backhaul– Revisit existing Policies & Pricing models
• Low Freq Bands
• Mid-Range Freq Band
• High Freq Bands
– Make sure the correct freq. band is used for the correct application
• Can you impose conditions instead a FEE ??
• Consider NFV, SDN etc.
Conclusion
• Need a Flexible Backhaul
• Optical Fiber Preferred…….. but Wireless would co-exist– Due to Technical and Financial non-feasibility
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd21
• Need a Flexible Backhaul
• Optical Fiber Preferred…….. but Wireless would co-exist– Due to Technical and Financial non-feasibility
Thank You
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd22
www.isac.lk
Backhaul with Microwave
Small Cell Sites Microwave Hub Sites Fiber/Microwave Hub site
Dr. Manodha Gamage - ISaC (Pvt.) Ltd23