This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1 1
Deputy Director, C5 Integration
J7: Force Development /
Training Solutions /
Warfighter Challenges
J2: ISR & Information Sharing
J3: Readiness & Adaptive Planning
Joint Staff
Navy: Norfolk Army: Ft. Eustis
Air Force: Langley AFB
Marine Corps: Quantico
Service Developers
Allied Command
Transformation
NATO
Coalition Partners
Command
and Control
Integration
PACOM SOCOM
CENTCOM TRANSCOM
EUCOM STRATCOM
NORTHCOM
SOUTHCOM
AFRICOM
Combatant Commands
2 2
MILCOM panel on Secure Information
Exchange with Non-Military Partners
and Entities
Mr. Stuart Whitehead Deputy Director
Command and Control Integration Joint Staff J6
3 3
Enable The Joint Force J6 Mission
Develop, integrate and assess C4/Cyber capability
requirements on behalf of the Joint Force in order to:
• Deliver a sustained information advantage
• Enable decision and action at the speed of the
problem
• Ensure the Warfighter receives jointly integrated
and effective capabilities necessary to conduct
operations
D
O
T
M
L
P
F
P
- Mission command
- Seize, retain and exploit initiative
- Global agility
- Partnering
- Flexibility in establishing Joint Forces
- Cross-domain synergy
- Information Sharing
- Increasingly discriminate to minimize
unintended consequences
Requirements Architectures Data Standards Assessment
Command and Control Integration (C2I)
Disciplined Requirement Development and Assessment
Software Encryption
Cyber Assessments
US-Coalition Data Exchange
Data and Standards
Mission Partner Environment
4 4
Premise
Key to Globally Integrated Operations is Interoperability
• The continual search for interoperability has been and continues
to be defined by the communities which seeks it.
• What works for one community may not work for another;
therefore, the interoperability standards for one community are
usually not interoperable with another – yielding tailored solutions.
• Contemporary operations demand increased information sharing,
often between un-forecasted entities.
5 5
Mission Partner Environment(MPE) Range of Military Operations
UNCLASS
NETWORKS
US BICES-X
Classified Releasable
FEDERATED MISSION NETWORKS
MN BICES
HA/DR MCO
MAX OMB
What is the CDRs intent? What is the mission?
Who are the partners? What classification level(s) do you need to operate in?
What information needs to be shared?
LOW TO HIGH
6 6
What is Needed
Future information exchange solutions must:
• Respond to warfighter needs
• Be data standards driven
• Allow agile implementation
• Be easily composable
• Be easily scalable
• Accommodate a diverse user community
• Quickly integrate unanticipated users
• Incorporate a “trust but verify” approach
7 7
Standards-Based Approach for Information Exchanges
The National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) provides a potential way forward
• Not a military “invention”
• Repeatable process for designing an information exchange
• Uses a collection of agreed, reusable data components
• XML-based
• Allows machine-to-machine data exchange to be implemented faster and at lower cost
• Approach already successfully demonstrated in a Mission Partner Environment
NIEM Information Exchange Request/Response Publish/Subscribe
NATO Confidentiality Labeling Guidance
(STANAG 4774) Elements (with examples) - Classification: SECRET, RESTRICTED, … - Releasable To: Releasable to SWE, AUS, … - Policy: NATO
Translation
Translation
Translation
US Labeling Guidance (IC-ISM)
Elements (with examples) - Classification: S, TS - Releasable To: ISAF,
NATO
POSREP AIRTRK OBSPOS SA
NIEM Message
POSREP AIRTRK OBSPOS SA
NIEM Message
POSREP AIRTRK OBSPOS SA
NIEM Message
Country
Role
Email
Clearance
Country
Role
Email
Clearance
Country
Role
Email
Clearance
Country
Role
Email
Clearance
Country
Role
Email
Clearance
9 9
How can Industry Help?
New Rules
• Our nation’s collective capability depends on industry for success in our future military operations, especially in environments that are increasingly dangerous and very complex.
• Industry, not Defense, is now the leader in IT development. Now is the time to accept the mission – knowing that our future security relies on commercial dominance. Embrace and adopt approaches that better meet the needs of our contemporary and future operating environments.
10 10
Questions ?
11 11
Mission Partner Environment - What does the Commander need?
Communicate Commander’s Intent
Build trust
Operate in the information environment
Create unity of effort
Possess speed of command
…not just share information
UNCLASSIFIED
“Our capabilities, tactics, techniques, procedures and terminology must be able to
translate across the services, the interagency and with our mission partners” (Chairman’s 2nd Term Strategic Direction to the Force)
12 12
MPE Operational Metrics
MPE “So What”
− Clearly Communicates Commander’s intent and provides speed of
command for desired operational effects with all mission partners
− Allows for US and non-US formations, information, and data to operate in