Top Banner
The Preprocessed Connectomes Project Quality Assessment Protocol - a resource for measuring the quality of MRI data Cameron Craddock Computational Neuroimaging Lab Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
20

PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Apr 13, 2017

Download

Engineering

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

The Preprocessed Connectomes Project

Quality Assessment Protocol - a resource for measuring the

quality of MRI data

Cameron CraddockComputational Neuroimaging Lab

Center for Biomedical Imaging and NeuromodulationNathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research

Center for the Developing BrainChild Mind Institute

Page 2: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Neuroimaging meets big data

1,112 rs-fMRI and MRI datasets539 w/ASD, 573 Typical

1,629 Healthy Controls3,357 MRI scans

5,093 rs-fMRI scans

Page 3: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Sharing preprocessed data

• Make data available to a wider audience of researchers

• Evaluate reproducibility of analysis results

http://preprocessed-connectomes-project.github.io/

Page 4: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Which of the data do you include in an analysis?

• Use it all and hope that the introduced error will be swamped out by the large number of samples? – data quality vs. size trade-off

• Only use the best data as determined by visual inspection?– Limited by intra- and inter- rater reliability– Is the human eye good enough to identify data that is good

enough? (what is “good enough” for data?)• Choose data based on quantitative metrics?

– Which Metrics?– What thresholds?

Page 5: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Motion Crisis

Page 6: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Motion Crisis 2016

Page 7: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Manualized manual inspection

https://github.com/SIMEXP/niak_manual/blob/master/qc_manual_v1.0/qc_manual_niak.pdf

Page 8: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Quality Assessment Protocol

http://preprocessed-connectomes-project.github.io/quality-assessment-protocol/

Page 9: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Quality Assessment Protocol (2)- Open source pipeline for calculating quality assessment measures

from raw MRI data- Implemented in Python using Nipype

- Fast execution on cluster and multi-core computers- Restart processing without having to redo everything

- Uses AFNI and custom Python functions- Runs on Mac OSX, Linux, BSD, and Unix

Page 10: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Spatial Measures• sMRI & fMRI• Foreground to Background Energy

Ratio• Contrast to Noise Ratio (sMRI only)• Entropy Focus Criterion• Smoothness (FWHM)• % Artifact Voxels• Signal-to-Noise Ratio• Ghost-to-Signal Ratio (fMRI only)

Mortamet et al 2009

Page 11: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Spatial Measures• sMRI & fMRI• Foreground to Background Energy

Ratio• Contrast to Noise Ratio (sMRI only)• Entropy Focus Criterion• Smoothness (FWHM)• % Artifact Voxels• Signal-to-Noise Ratio• Ghost-to-Signal Ratio (fMRI only)

Page 12: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Temporal Measures • Global Correlation (GCOR)• Standardized DVARS• Median distance index• Mean Functional

Displacement• # Voxels with FD > 0.2m• % Voxels with FD > 0.2m

Page 13: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Reports

Page 14: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Repository of data measures

• Normative datasets to help learn thresholds for quality control– ABIDE– CoRR

http://preprocessed-connectomes-project.github.io/quality-assessment-protocol/

Page 15: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

B

Correlation Between Measures

A

Correlation between measures for structural (A) and functional (B) data. ABIDE on lower triangle, CoRR on upper triangle. X values are insignificant at FDR corrected q < 0.05.

Page 16: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Most discriminative measures

Green is good data, red is poor data as determined by manual assessments from four expert raters (consensus).

Page 17: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Test-Retest Reliability

Page 18: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

Acknowledgements• Steve Giavasis, MS @ Child Mind Institute – developer• Sang Han Lee, PhD @ Nathan Kline Institute – analysis• John Pellman, BA @ Child Mind Institute –

documentation and support• Zarrar Shehzad, MA @ Yale – initial implementation• Chris Gorgelewski, PD @ Stanford – contributor

Page 19: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol

06.26 - 06.30 OHBM Hackathon,

Lausanne09.18 - 09.20

Brainhack Vienna10.10 - 10.12

Brainhack LA

Page 20: PCP Quality Assessment Protocol