The Preprocessed Connectomes Project Quality Assessment Protocol - a resource for measuring the quality of MRI data Cameron Craddock Computational Neuroimaging Lab Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
The Preprocessed Connectomes Project
Quality Assessment Protocol - a resource for measuring the
quality of MRI data
Cameron CraddockComputational Neuroimaging Lab
Center for Biomedical Imaging and NeuromodulationNathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Center for the Developing BrainChild Mind Institute
Neuroimaging meets big data
1,112 rs-fMRI and MRI datasets539 w/ASD, 573 Typical
1,629 Healthy Controls3,357 MRI scans
5,093 rs-fMRI scans
Sharing preprocessed data
• Make data available to a wider audience of researchers
• Use it all and hope that the introduced error will be swamped out by the large number of samples? – data quality vs. size trade-off
• Only use the best data as determined by visual inspection?– Limited by intra- and inter- rater reliability– Is the human eye good enough to identify data that is good
enough? (what is “good enough” for data?)• Choose data based on quantitative metrics?
Correlation between measures for structural (A) and functional (B) data. ABIDE on lower triangle, CoRR on upper triangle. X values are insignificant at FDR corrected q < 0.05.
Most discriminative measures
Green is good data, red is poor data as determined by manual assessments from four expert raters (consensus).
Test-Retest Reliability
Acknowledgements• Steve Giavasis, MS @ Child Mind Institute – developer• Sang Han Lee, PhD @ Nathan Kline Institute – analysis• John Pellman, BA @ Child Mind Institute –
documentation and support• Zarrar Shehzad, MA @ Yale – initial implementation• Chris Gorgelewski, PD @ Stanford – contributor