Top Banner
Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012
24

Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

Jan 21, 2016

Download

Documents

Rodger Norton
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand

August 2012

Page 2: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

Overview

1 Strategic Context

2 Design Considerations

3 Our Approach

4 Benefits for Company & Individual

5 Lessons Learnt

6 Summary

Page 3: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

Strategic Context

01

Page 4: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

Strategic Context - Business Success Depends On Effective Human Capital Management

InvolveHR Sales Business Value Enhancement

Financial Impact Productivity Performance Innovation Customer Loyalty

Business Strategy& Vision

Market Position Revenue Growth Customer Impact Internal Business Customer Loyalty

StrategyD

esign

Capability

Rewards

Work

Design

Technology

Human Capital Management

Metrics & Feedback

Page 5: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

5

• 2 Key HR Drivers of Business Success– Differentiated Rewards; and – Effective Performance Management

• Evidence is Clear– People Performance = Business Results– Top performing companies

• Provide superior rewards for performance• Manage performance well• Invest in development

Business Context- Importance of Compensation Management

Page 6: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

6

Example : XYZ Company– Revenues: £100m– Total operating expenses: £90m– Compensation expense: £45m– Profit Before Tax (PBT): £10m – Employees : 1,500– Average comp/employee: £30,000– +/-10% numbers/costs: +/-45% PBT

Managing CompensationInvestment is Critical !

Page 7: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

Design Considerations

02

Page 8: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

8

What is “Pay for Performance”?

“An approach to linking elements of the total remuneration package to the achievement

of specified performance outcomes”

Page 9: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

9

What should We Pay For? #1

• Job Size & Responsibilities– Salary - linked to external market rates

• Spot Rates – e.g. €20k for bank tellers• Salary Ranges – e.g. €16k - €24k

• Age/Service– Salary increases over time

• Incremental scales – e.g. 12 points on scale– Plus 1 point for every year of service

Page 10: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

10

• Skills and Competencies– Salary increases with growth in capability

• Performance– Company – Division– Business Unit– Team/Function– Individual

What should We Pay For? #2What should We Pay For? #2

Page 11: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

11

Pay for Performance- Which elements? #1

• Salary– Progression up a salary range

• Stronger performers get bigger increases– Speed of progression– Ultimate position in salary range

• Bonus Awards– Size of “pot” linked to Co. performance– Individual award based on personal rating

• Incentive Awards– Usually linked to predetermined targets

Page 12: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

12

Pay for Performance- Which elements? #2

• Stock Programmes– Profit Sharing Schemes

• Portion of profit allocated to fund profit shares• Usually applies to all eligible staff• Same basis for all – e.g. 5% of base salary

– Stock Options • Option to acquire stock in the future at today’s market price• Generally reserved for senior management

– Long Term Incentive Plans• Typically deferred stock grants

Page 13: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

13

Design Objectives- How much to pay?

• Policy on Target Market Position– How do we want to compare to the external market in which

we compete for talent?• Salary ranges at Market Median (M)?• Total cash at Upper Quartile (Q3)?

• Overall Cost Parameters– How will we ensure that any additional costs of PRP are self-

funding?– How will our design help to maximise our return on payroll

investment?

Page 14: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

Our Approach

03

Page 15: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

15

Effective Design- Our Approach

1. Objectives Definition

2. Current State Analysis

4. Finalise Detailed Design

of Selected Option

3. Modelling of High Level Options

Page 16: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

Assessing your Design

The “ABCP” System Adequacy– Is it enough?

Budget– What can the business afford?

Competition– How do we want to compare?

Perception– Will this motivate staff to deliver results?

Page 17: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

Benefits for Company and Individual

04

Page 18: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

18

Benefits for Company

A well designed PRP structure will deliver:

• Sensible grading and salary structures– Market based, competitive salary ranges

• Stronger support for business objectives– Direct links to achievement of key business and

financial objectives• Performance culture– Strong performers get higher salaries and incentive

awards• Increased ROI on payroll investment– Greater control over payroll expense – Additional costs are self-funding

Page 19: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

19

Benefits for the Individual- What’s in it for me?

A well designed PRP structure will deliver:• Win, Win– Higher earnings opportunity for all

• Higher salaries– Larger increases & quicker range progression for

consistently strong performers• Increased variable earnings opportunity– For achievement of balanced scorecard targets

• Greater control and transparency– Opportunity to influence my salary & bonus awards

Page 20: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

Lessons Learnt

05

Page 21: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

21

Lessons Learnt

• Document desired performance outcomes– Company; Team; Individual

• Ensure optimal balance of reward components– Salary; bonus/incentive; stock; benefits

• Avoid “paying on the double”• Deliver significant differentiation in awards• Maximise “line of sight” for participants• Careful modelling to maximise ROI

– Rigorously test options and outcomes!!• Robust performance management is critical

– PRP demands ability to measure performance in a clear, objective and defensible way

Page 22: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

Summary

06

Page 23: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

Summary

Everything starts with objectives!!– Clearly define desired performance outcomes

Strategic implies continuing approach– Review and modify components in context of business and compensation

objectives

Piecemeal design implies waste– Examine impact of changes to individual components on total reward

architecture

Comms & change management are critical– Engage stakeholders throughout the design effort

Page 24: Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.

Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand

August 2012