Pauli-like principle for Abelian and non-Abelian FQHE quasiparticles F. D. M. Haldane , Princeton University. P 46.7, APS March Meeting, Baltimore, March 15, 2006 Supported in part by NSF MRSEC DMR0213706 at Princeton Center for Complex Materials * Generalization of the notion of Fock space to fractional statistics particles. * Simple and transparent rules for counting states, and a powerful new technique for practical many-body calculations with fractional statistics.
16
Embed
Pauli-like principle for Abelian and non-Abelian FQHE ...haldane/talks/fdmh_aps2006.pdf · Pauli-like principle for Abelian and non-Abelian FQHE quasiparticles F. D. M. Haldane ,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Pauli-like principle for Abelian and non-Abelian
FQHE quasiparticles F. D. M. Haldane , Princeton University.
P 46.7, APS March Meeting, Baltimore, March 15, 2006
Supported in part by NSF MRSEC DMR0213706 at Princeton Center for Complex Materials
* Generalization of the notion of Fock space to fractional statistics particles.
* Simple and transparent rules for counting states, and a powerful new technique for practical many-body calculations with fractional statistics.
• Holes in the filled Landau level ( ν = 1 ) are h/e vortices that obey Fermi statistics, and can be also be described in a standard fermion Fock space with a Pauli principle.
!(r1, . . . rN ) =N!
i=1
Nh!
j=1
(zi ! wj)!
i<j
(zi ! zj)!
i
!R(ri)
• expand in an (angular momentum) zm occupation number basis
complex coordinate of the j’th vortex/hole
Gaussian state centered at R.
|1111111111111100000000000!
|1110111101111111000000000!edge of (circular) droplet
droplet swells as holes are added
This is a Slater determinant !
what about the 1/m Laughlin states?
• wavefunction looks very similar, but is not a Slater determinant. Is there an alternative “occupation number” description?
!(r1, . . . rN ) =N!
i=1
Nh!
j=1
(zi ! wj)!
i<j
(zi ! zj)m!
i
!R(ri)
• In fact, the Laughlin state (circular droplet) is given by
P0|1001001001001001001000000!
Projection into a certain subspace; without this, the state is the (incorrect) Tao-Thouless Slater Determinant state
• For k = 1, this is just the standard lowest Landau-level single-particle creation operator
c(R)†|vac! " !R(r1)
Fundamental property of 1/m Laughlin state (and of Laughlin state + fractional charge/statistics quasiholes):
• There are NO pairs of particles with relative angular momentum (z-z′)m′ where m′ < m. The Laughlin state is annihilated by these two-body destruction operators!
• Define P0 (2,m) as the projection into the subspace of null states of (all) η2,m′(R), m′ ≤ m.
• 1/m Laughlin state with quasiholes at ri obeys
!2,m!(R)|!! = 0, m! = m" 2,m" 4, . . . all R
P0(2,m! 2)|!" = 0, c(ri)|!" = 0.
A linearly-independent basis of the 1/m Laughlin null space:
• Choose a subset of the set of all Slater determinant states where
• NO GROUP OF m CONSECUTIVE ORBITALS CONTAINS MORE THAN 1 PARTICLE
• then project on these with P0 (2,m-2) ! The Laughlin state is the incompressible highest-density state obeying this rule.
• The 1/3 Laughlin state is
* (all statements here have been confirmed numerically)
P0(2, 1)|1001001001001001001000000!
Essentially the same principle works for the (non-Abelian) Moore-Read (”Pfaffian”) and
Read-Rezayi (”parafermion”) states!!!
• Moore-Read state (FQHE analog of a BCS state):
|!(m)MR〉 ∝ Pf
ij
!1
zi − zj
" #
i<j
(zi − zj)m#
i
!R(ri)
Pf(A2n×2n) =1
2nn!
2n!!
P=1
!(P )n"
i=1
AP (2n−1)P (2n)
• 1/m+1 = 1, 1/2, 1/3, ... Moore-Read states are the highest density null states of the 3-body operator.
!3,m(R)|!! = 0 all R!2,m!(R)|!! = 0, m! = m" 2,m" 4, . . . all Rplus (for m > 1)
• Moore-Read basis set: Not more than 2 particles in 2m+2 consecutive orbitals, plus not more than 1 in m consecutive orbitals.
• ν = 1/2 fermionic MR state (m=1) :P0(3, 1)|1100110011001100110011000000!
• h/2e (fractionalized) “nonabelian” vortices at Ri:
!2,m(Ri)|!! = 0 Can’t destroy a 2-particle pair centered at vortex position Ri
(can be done at all other locations
• Moore-Read state is k=2 member of ν = k/mk+2 Read-Rezayi states. Everything generalizes to k > 2.
Note: a (not accidental!) similarity to a spin-1 quantum chain at the critical point separating “Haldane gap” and dimerized phases
Classification of polynomial occupation numer states as a partially-ordered set (POSET)
• Three classes:
• (a) “allowed configurations” that satisfy the Pauli-like k-particle selection rule (includes TOP) |1001001001......>
• (b) “not allowed , but generated by “squeezing” action of P0 on “allowed configurations” (includes BOTTOM) |0110001001....>
• (c) “excluded” (not (a) or (b)) |1010101001...>
Leads to a highly efficient method for numerical construction of null space of η(k+1,m) and η(2,m′<m)
Two ingredients of a calculation:
• “Null space” (such as lowest Landau level) defines a low energy Hilbert space.
• Need a second ingredient: a Hamiltonian that acts in this Hilbert space (e.g. Coulomb interaction, background potential, probes to manipulate vortex positions, etc.)
Numerical study of Moore-Read h/2e vortices
• Project the Coulomb and substrate potential into the null space (a generalization of projection into a Landau level).
• Null space basis states are computed accurately with a (new?) variant of Lanczos, (annihilation is accurate to floating-point machine precision, 64bit).
• Spherical geometry (sphere surrounding a magnetic monopole) is used: eliminates edges, Wigner-Eckert simplifies calculations.
• basis set size for 14/28 Moore-Read :140,116,60. But, after construction of the “fractional statistics generalization of Fock space” this is reduced to 540!
• Energy levels found, local single-particle and m=1 pair densities imaged.
the qubit doublet is split by the Coulomb interaction, both states are shown
One qubit is left after positions of vortices are fixed.
Summary.• A very simple recipe for counting and constructing
basis set of quasiholes in Laughlin, Moore-Read, and Read-Rezayi FQHE states.
• Practical method for previously-impossible inhomogenous finite-size calculations; “Fock space” for fractional statistics
• (also, for m=0 bosons) A remarkable correspondence to integrable critical spin chains: (k=1 Laughlin to S=1/2 Haldane-Shastry, k>1 to spin-k/2 generalizations of HS) (not described here)