Top Banner
© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 14
17

Patterson ch14

Feb 13, 2017

Download

Education

sandovalhistory
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Chapter 14

Page 2: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-2

The Federal Judicial SystemThe Supreme Court of the United States

Original jurisdictionAppellate jurisdictionSelecting and deciding cases

Writ of certiorariIssuing decisions and opinions

Majority Plurality Concurring Dissenting

Page 3: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-3

Page 4: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-4

The Federal Judicial SystemOther federal courts

U.S. district courtsU.S. courts of appealsSpecial U.S. courts

The state courtsPolitical appointmentElected judges (most common form)Merit-plan judges

Page 5: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-5

Page 6: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-6

Page 7: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-7

Page 8: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-8

Federal Court AppointeesSupreme Court nominees

Presidents nominate those with compatible political philosophy

Nearly all recent appointees from appellate courtsVery few nominees rejected by Senate after nineteenth

century

Page 9: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-9

Federal Court AppointeesLower-court nominees

Senatorial courtesyPresidents typically select members of same party

Personal backgrounds of judicial appointeesMost are white men, but diversity has increased in recent

decades

Page 10: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-10

Page 11: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-11

Page 12: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-12

The Nature of Judicial Decision Making

Legal influences on judicial decisionsThe facts of a caseThree main sources of law

The ConstitutionLegislative statutes Legal precedents

Page 13: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-13

Page 14: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-14

The Nature of Judicial Decision Making

Political influences on judicial decisionsInside the Court: judges’ political beliefs

Justices vote in line with their political attitudesNot all issues clear-cut

Page 15: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-15

The Nature of Judicial Decision Making

Political influences on judicial decisionsOutside the Court: the public, groups, and elected officials

Court cannot move too far from public opinion Interest groups file amicus curiae briefsCongressional legislation Presidential appointments

Page 16: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-16

Judicial Power and Democratic Government

Originalism theory versus living constitution theoryOriginalism: determine and preserve founders’ intent

But how determine that intent?Living constitution: adaptable to changing circumstances

and challenges

Page 17: Patterson ch14

© 2015 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 14-17

Judicial Power and Democratic Government

Judicial restraint versus judicial activismJudicial restraint: judges should abide by precedent and

legislation.Judicial activism: judges should interpret the Constitution

and statutes in light of established principles when elected officials fail to do so.

What is the judiciary’s proper role?