Top Banner
Patient Engagement and Health Transparency G. Daniel Martich, MD, FACP | June 17, 2014
48

Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Dec 22, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

G. Daniel Martich, MD, FACP | June 17, 2014

Page 2: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

History – Untethered – Tethered

Current State – Scheduling – Billing – ePrescibing – Get Medical Advice – Results – Proxy – eVisits/Anywhere Care

Future – Open Notes – Chronic conditions – Social Network

Presentation Overview

2

“Now is the perfect time to change” - Mark Bertolini HIMSS 2014

Page 3: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

3

Patients don’t stop being consumers – customers – when they put on a hospital gown Micah Solomon, Forbes Contributor

Page 4: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

• Pros – Patient/consumer controlled – No HIPAA concerns – Most up-to-date

information

Untethered Personal Health Record

4

• Cons – Consider the source – Tools vary – Synchronizing multiple

databases – Little/no security – No secure communication

with provider

“Consumer empowerment versus consumer populism in healthcare IT, “JAMIA, Simborg, 370-372 (April 2010)

Page 5: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

• Pros – Open communication with

provider – Patients don’t need to re-

enter data – Secure and HIPAA compliant – Tied to MU – Optimize time utilization for

physician and patients

Tethered Personal Health Record

5

• Cons – Office/physician MUST

USE EMR, not just have it in their practice

– Less flexible – Untethered PHR’s

“Consumer empowerment versus consumer populism in healthcare IT,” JAMIA, Simborg, 370-372 (April 2010)

Page 6: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

• Implemented September 2004

• Aggressive implementation began September 2008

• 239,815 MyUPMC users • 23,000+ Mobile App users

MyUPMC – Current State

6

373

83574

121831

225182

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Num

ber o

f Pat

ient

s

MyUPMC Registered Users

Page 7: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Scheduling

7

Page 8: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

• eStatements • Payments • View insurance

summary • Chat with Customer

Service

Billing

8

Page 9: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

• Renew prescriptions • Requests refills • Helps meet secure

messaging measure for Meaningful Use Stage 2

Prescription Renewal

9

Page 10: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Get Medical Advice

10

Page 11: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Laboratory

Results

11

Page 12: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

PT/INR

Results

12

Page 13: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Results

13

Results Automatically Released to MyUPMC

Radiology

Page 14: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Pathology

Results

14

Results Automatically Released to HealthTrak

Page 15: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Cardiology

Results

15

Page 16: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Gastroenterology

Results

16

Page 17: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Gastroenterology

Results

17

Page 18: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Pulmonary

Results

18

Page 19: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Neurology

Results

19

Page 20: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

• >4.5 million results released • Approximately 250K MyUPMC patients have received auto-

release results

Auto-Release – Overall Statistics

20

Results Automatically Released to MyUPMC

Page 21: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Results

21

The test results you are about to review may contain information that may be confusing or cause concern. If you have not already communicated with your provider we recommend you contact him/her to discuss and clarify the meaning of your results.

Page 22: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

• Care Taker vs Care Partner • Patient portals

• Should the Care Partner

have access to this information?

Proxy

22

“Care Partners and Online Patient Portals,” JAMA, Sarkar & Bates, E1-E2 (January 2014)

Page 23: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

• Barriers – Access to share patient portal – HIPAA – No broadly adopted standards for Care Partner access

• Benefits to breaking down barriers

– Distance – Between-visit chronic disease self-management – Asynchronous modes of communication

• It’s solvable

– Provide separate credentials – Document Care Partner in EHR – Tie to MU

Proxy

23

“Care Partners and Online Patient Portals,” JAMA, Sarkar & Bates, E1-E2 (January 2014)

Page 24: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

eVisits/Anywhere Care

24

Page 25: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

25

DeJong, Santa, Dudley; JAMA April 2, 2014 Volume 311, Number 13, page 1287-1288

Page 26: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

• Continuity Care – Available to patients that have

had an appointment in the last 3 years with a UPMC PCP practice that participates in the UPMC AnywhereCare program

– Patients expected response time will be within 1 business day

eVisits/Anywhere Care

26

Page 27: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

• Convenience Care – Available to any user physically

located in the state of Pennsylvania (at the time of submission)

– Available 7 days per week, 24 hours per day

– Patients expect a 30 minute response time

– Video option available for patients (9 am – 9 pm)

• Coverage provided by – UPMC Urgent Care Centers

Advanced Practice Providers and Physicians (6 am to 9 pm)

– Emergency Medicine Command Center Physicians (9 pm – 6 am)

UPMC AnywhereCare

27

Page 28: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

eVisits/Anywhere Care

28

• Adults – Adult Patients (18 years of age or older) – A proxy of an Adult Patient (18 years of age or older)

• Pediatrics – Proxies of Pediatric Patients (3 - 17 years of age)*

– Limited to 3 medical conditions/diagnosis and video only – Cold, Cough and Pink Eye

*Pediatric UPMC AnywhereCare visits will be responded to by: 1. Children’s Community Pediatrics Physicians (Convenience

Care Model) 2. Participating Family Medicine Physicians (Continuity Care

Model)

Page 29: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

• Benefits of eVisit ‒ Convenience and efficiency ‒ Lower costs - $38 ‒ Provided by Primary Care

Physician/ Advanced Practice Providers

• Potential drawbacks of eVisit ‒ Can a physician make an accurate

diagnosis? ‒ Are correct tests and follow up

ordered? ‒ Are drugs being overprescribed? ‒ Medical Malpractice issues ‒ Technical issues of video vs text

only ‒ Connected devices ‒ State licensure in order to be able

to prescribe across state lines

eVisits/Anywhere Care

29

eVisits vs. Office visits

“A Comparison of Care at E-visits and Physician Office Visits for Sinusitis and Urinary Tract Infection,” JAMA INTERN MED, Mehrotra et al 173 (NO. 1), 72-74 (JAN 2013)

Page 30: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

30

Page 31: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Findings: eVisit vs. Office Visit Sinusitis and Urinary Tract Infection • UTI

– Less likely to order UTI-relevant test at eVisit

– Number of follow up visits were the same

– Less likely to order preventative care at eVisit

– More likely to prescribe antibiotic at eVisit

• Sinusitis – Follow up visits were the same – Less likely to order preventative

care at eVisit – More likely to prescribe antibiotic

at eVisit

eVisits/Anywhere Care

31 “A Comparison of Care at E-visits and Physician Office Visits for Sinusitis and Urinary Tract

Infection,” JAMA INTERN MED, Mehrotra et al 173 (NO. 1), 72-74 (JAN 2013)

Page 32: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

eVisits/Anywhere Care

32

Page 33: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

33

Page 34: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Open Notes

34

Page 35: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

35

Kahn, Bell, Walker, Delbanco, JAMA April 2, 2014 Volume 311, Number 13

Page 36: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

• Medical device integration (MDI) -process of taking the data from those devices and integrating it to an EHR.

• Examples include defibrillators, electrocardiographs, vital signs monitors, ventilators and infusion pumps – Diabetes Mellitus – glucometer – Obstructive Lung Disease – spirometer – CHF – scale

Chronic Conditions

36

Page 37: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Invest In Wellness

37

Page 38: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Heal Yourself

38

Page 39: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Social Networking

39

Page 40: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

An Engaged Patient is a Healthy Patient

40

“How Doctors Rate Patients,” Wall Street Journal, Landro, March 31, 2014

Page 41: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

41

Page 42: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

42

Page 43: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

43

Page 44: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

44

Page 45: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

• Just because we can – Clinical Messaging – Research interests – Surveys – Advertising

• Caution based on clinical decision support alerts

Communication with Patients

45

Page 46: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

Future

46

Page 47: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

- Pope John Paul II

“ The future starts today, not tomorrow.” - Pope John Paul II

Page 48: Patient Engagement and Health Transparency

QUESTIONS

48

Questions?