Top Banner
Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013
26

Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Mar 30, 2015

Download

Documents

Tatum Burnworth
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Partnership for PatientsSafe Deliveries RoadmapOn-Boarding Webcast

July 8, 2013

Page 2: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Safe Deliveries Roadmap Project Coordinator

Mara Zabari, Director of Integration Partnership for Patients

[email protected]

Page 3: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Project Leaders

Tom Benedetti, MD Dale Reisner, MDUniversity of Washington Swedish Hospital

Page 4: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Safe Deliveries Roadmap Consultants

Eric Knox, MD Kathleen SimpsonPhD, RNC, FAAN

Page 5: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

The Vision

Page 6: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

The BIG Picture

Page 7: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Today’s Webcast Objectives• Project updates• Review induction management bundle

clarification• Laying the foundation• Medicaid Quality Incentive – OB measures• Sharing practices• Discuss upcoming activities

Page 8: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Participating Hospitals• Cascade Valley• Central Hospital• Coulee Medical Center• EvergreenHealth• Harrison Medical Center• Highline Medical Center• Island Hospital• Jefferson Healthcare• Kittitas Valley Healthcare• Lake Chelan Community Hospital• Mid Valley Hospital• Multicare Auburn• Multicare Good Samaritan Hospital• Multicare Tacoma General Hospital• Newport Hospital• Northwest Hospital• Othello Community Hospital• Overlake Hospital• PeaceHealth Southwest• PeaceHealth St. Joseph• Providence Mt. Carmel Hospital• Providence Regional Medical Center

• Providence St. Mary Medical Center• Providence St. Peter Hospital• Pullman Regional Hospital • Samaritan• Skagit Valley Hospital• St. Francis Hospital• St. Joseph Medical Center• Sunnyside Hospital• Swedish Ballard• Swedish First Hill• Swedish Edmonds• Swedish Issaquah• Three Rivers Hospital • University of Washington Medical Center• Walla Walla General Hospital • Whidbey General Hospital• Whitman Hospital• Valley General Hospital• Valley Hospital • UW/Valley Medical Center• Yakima Valley Hospital

Page 9: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Project Time Line Update• June – July

• Laying the foundation

• August – November• Education• Tools testing and revision

• December• Baseline data collection

• January• Implement bundle practices

AND, THEY’RE OFF!

Page 10: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Other Project Updates• Hospital questionnaire

• Contact lists• List-serves• Meeting notifications• Primary contact

• Provider session topics• Readiness assessment

Page 11: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Induction Management Bundle Clarification

Failed Induction Definition: Induced, but does not enter active labor (>6cms)

• Uterine contractions• Failure to achieve contractions every 3 min with cervical change after 24 hrs of

pitocin plus ruptured membranes (if no contraindications), or• Contractions every 3 min x 24 hrs without entering active phase for those with

initial Bishop score less than 8 or if cervical ripening used• Inadequate response to a needed, clinically appropriate, second cervical ripening

agent• Membranes have been ruptured with inadequate progress (assuming feasible and no

contraindications to AROM)• Pitocin has been given per hospital protocol if inadequate frequency +/or intensity of

contractions occur after cervical ripening alone• If ROM, Pitocin given x 12 hrs without regular contractions resulting in cervical change

Discuss options for further management: Consider RBA of all options (D/C home w/plan for f/u versus C-Section, depending on the clinical situation)

Page 12: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Laying the FoundationEarly Establishment of EDD

ACOG CriteriaEstimated Date of Delivery - use EDD, not EDC and report as wks + days, not in decimals – eg 38 5/7 wks (ReVitalize, 12/2012)

The best obstetrical Estimated Date of Delivery (EDD) is determined by: 1) Last menstrual period (LMP) if confirmed by early ultrasound or no ultrasound

performed *, or 2) Early ultrasound if no known LMP or the ultrasound is not consistent with LMP,

or 3) Known date of conception (eg. ART, IUI, IVF) dating

* Ultrasound-established dates should take preference over menstrual dates when discrepancy is >7 days in 1st tri and >10 days in the 2nd tri. US considered to confirm menstrual dates if GA agreement within 1 week by 1st trimester CRL or within 10 days by averaging multiple 2nd trimester fetal biometric measurements (up to 20 wks gestation) ACOG Practice Bulletin 101

Page 13: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Laying the FoundationEarly Establishment of EDD

8% Rule Comparison of Ultrasound with LMP clinical dating for best EDD Most accurate method at any gestational age Method (may be used by Radiology, MFM): Convert LMP & US

EGA’s from wks to days, multiply x .08 for # days diff & use US if greater, use LMP if less than calculated variance.

Eg: LMP ga is 9wks (63days x .08 = +/-5 days) but US ga is 10wks (or 7days greater) – thus the US is most accurate EDD for this pg (by ACOG would stay with LMP dating since +/- 1 wk)

Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Estimating fetal age: Computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiol. 1984;152:497-501.

Savitz DA, Terry JW, Dole N, Thorp JM, Siega-Riz AM, Herring AH. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning and their combination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1660

Page 14: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Laying the FoundationInduction Consent

• Combination Patient Education and Consent Form explains:• Why induction is being done (Medical indication or “Elective”)• Potential Risks & Benefits & Alternatives• Possible options for cervical ripening, if needed• Oxytocin use

• Providers appreciate the balance of informing women of the increased risk of C/section, longer labor, poor fetal transition, when induction is not medically necessary – but information is presented in a manner to not scare them if delivery is medically indicated.

• Discuss & Sign at time of Scheduling the Induction! Fax to L&D• Some versions include Bishop Score, thus may aid schedulers• Do not take the place of hospital consents for care

Page 15: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Questions

Page 16: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Medicaid Quality IncentiveSafe Deliveries: Induction Appropriateness and Elective Deliveries Prior to 39 Weeks(Hospitals with obstetrical programs only)

Improvement measure: percent of patients undergoing a medical or non medical labor induction with documentation of consent, Bishop Score, and indication

Sustaining measure: percent of patients with Elective Deliveries 37 to less than 39 weeks gestational age

Page 17: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Induction Appropriateness

• Numerator:Number of patients undergoing a medical or non-medical induction with documentations of consent, Bishop’s score and indication

• Denominator: Number of patients undergoing a medical or non-medical induction

Documentation sources for Bishop score and induction can be taken from the consent, medical record, or checklist available if audited by the Healthcare Authority. Hospitals are encouraged to make a part of the medical record if possible.

Page 18: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Induction Appropriateness (Cont:)For hospitals that use on each of their induction patients a standard hospital consent that includes all elements, no audit is needed.

For written consent the following is required under RCW 7.70.060(1):

• Identification of patient • Name of hospital in which treatment is to be performed • Name of attending physician • Nature, anticipated results, alternatives to and risk of proposed treatment, including nontreatment • When the proposed treatment will be given • Date and time of signing the consent • Signature of patient or patient’s representative • Witness

If hospital does not use a standard consent for all induction patients, the hospital will conduct an audit of a minimum of thirty records randomly selected to review if all elements of consent are present. Audit must be available for the Health Care Authority to review.

http://www.wsha.org/qualityincentive.cfm

Page 19: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Induction Appropriateness (Cont:)Fields to be reported: • Number of patients undergoing a medical or non-medical

induction with documentation of consent, Bishop score and induction indication. (numerator)

• Number of patients undergoing a medical or non-medical induction. (denominator)

Data collection period: • September 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013 • Reporting deadline: 45 days following the end of the

quarter Award table:

Page 20: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Consent and Scheduling Form

Page 21: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Community Sharing

Page 22: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Elective Deliveries Prior to 39 Weeks(Applies to hospitals with obstetrical programs only)

Sustaining Measure: Percent of Patients with Elective Deliveries 37 to Less than 39 Weeks Gestational Age

• Review Process• No Sampling

Safe Deliverieshttp://www.wsha.org/0513.cfm%20

Page 23: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Elective Deliveries Prior to 39 Weeks (Cont:)

Fields to be reported: • Patients with elective deliveries >= 37 and < 39 weeks of gestation • Patients delivering newborns with >= 37 and < 39 weeks of gestation after

exclusions removed (see denominator definition above)

Data collection period: July 1, 2013 – December 31, 2013

Reporting deadline: 90 days following the end of a quarter and final data in by March 30, 2014

Award table:

Page 24: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Community Sharing

Page 25: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Meeting Schedule• On-boarding (webcast)

• Thursday, August 15th 7:00 – 8:00 a.m.

• Monthly (webcast)• Tuesday, September 3rd 7:00 – 8:00 a.m.• Tuesday, October 22nd 7:00 – 8:00 a.m.• Tuesday, November 5th 7:00 – 8:00 a.m.• Thursday, December 5th 7:00 – 8:00 a.m.

• Safe Table (in-person)• Tuesday, November 19th 9:00 – 2:30 p.m.

First Quarter 2014 meetings will be determined by October 2013

Page 26: Partnership for Patients Safe Deliveries Roadmap On-Boarding Webcast July 8, 2013.

Questions?Mara Zabari, Director of Integration

Partnership for Patients

[email protected]