Top Banner
PARTIE II PARTIE II Introduction à la Introduction à la Modélisation Modélisation & & à l’ Optimisation à l’ Optimisation Modèle GPIM Modèle GPIM vs vs GRP GRP Optimisation « Overhaul Policy B-H » Optimisation « Overhaul Policy B-H » Antinomie selon le REX pour la Antinomie selon le REX pour la modélisation modélisation MC/MP MC/MP GPIM_PLP GPIM_PLP vs vs GPIM_LLP GPIM_LLP
55

PARTIE II

Feb 02, 2016

Download

Documents

vilina

PARTIE II. Introduction à la Modélisation & à l’ Optimisation Modèle GPIM vs GRP Optimisation « Overhaul Policy B-H » Antinomie selon le REX pour la modélisation MC/MP GPIM_PLP vs GPIM_LLP. REF 1 : cf.Generalized proportional intensities models for repairable systems. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: PARTIE II

PARTIE IIPARTIE IIIntroduction à la Introduction à la

ModélisationModélisation & &

à l’ Optimisationà l’ Optimisation

Modèle GPIM Modèle GPIM vsvs GRP GRP Optimisation « Overhaul Policy B-H »Optimisation « Overhaul Policy B-H » Antinomie selon le REX pour la Antinomie selon le REX pour la

modélisationmodélisation MC/MP MC/MP GPIM_PLP GPIM_PLP vs vs GPIM_LLPGPIM_LLP

Page 2: PARTIE II

REF 1 : cf.Generalized proportional intensities models for repairable systems.

By D.F. PERCY & B.M. ALKALI. Journal of Management Mathematics(2006) 17,171-185.

Page 3: PARTIE II
Page 4: PARTIE II

REF 2 : cf. Discontinuous point processes for the analysis of REF 2 : cf. Discontinuous point processes for the analysis of repairable units .repairable units .

By R.CALABRIA & G. PULCINI. By R.CALABRIA & G. PULCINI. International Journal OF Reliability, Quality and Safety International Journal OF Reliability, Quality and Safety

Engineering (1999) Engineering (1999) Vol.6, N°.4, 361-382.Vol.6, N°.4, 361-382.

Page 5: PARTIE II

REF 3:P_PLP REF 3:P_PLP cf.Practical Methods for Modeling Repairable cf.Practical Methods for Modeling Repairable Systems with Time Trends and Repair Effects. Systems with Time Trends and Repair Effects.

by H. GUO, W. ZHAO & A. METTAS. IEEE(2006).by H. GUO, W. ZHAO & A. METTAS. IEEE(2006).L_LLP L_LLP cf.A New Stochastic Model for Systems Under cf.A New Stochastic Model for Systems Under

General Repair. General Repair. by H. GUO, W. ZHAO & A. METTAS. IEEE(2007).by H. GUO, W. ZHAO & A. METTAS. IEEE(2007).

Page 6: PARTIE II

BASELINE MODELSBASELINE MODELS

)1(** t

Page 7: PARTIE II

With the power-law intensity baseline functionWith the power-law intensity baseline functionLog Likelihood “ SIMPLE SYSTEM TYPE I ”Log Likelihood “ SIMPLE SYSTEM TYPE I ”

PARTIAL REPAIR (CM PARTIAL REPAIR (CM (PERCY) , (PERCY) , (GUO) , (GUO) , (CALABRIA)) (CALABRIA))

Page 8: PARTIE II

GRAPHIQUE par CALCUL ANALYTIQUE du modèle GRAPHIQUE par CALCUL ANALYTIQUE du modèle P_PLP/PIM_PLPP_PLP/PIM_PLP

P_PLP[P_PLP[_,t_] = (-1/_,t_] = (-1/)*Log[(1-)*Log[(1-**λλ*t^*t^)];)]; = 3, λ = 0.001. = 3, λ = 0.001.

= Exp[-]

Page 9: PARTIE II

With the log-linear intensity baseline functionWith the log-linear intensity baseline functionLog Likelihood “ SIMPLE SYSTEM TYPE I ”Log Likelihood “ SIMPLE SYSTEM TYPE I ”

PARTIAL REPAIR (CM PARTIAL REPAIR (CM (PERCY) , (PERCY) , (GUO) , (GUO) , (CALABRIA)) (CALABRIA))

Page 10: PARTIE II

Log Likelihood “ MULTI- SYSTEMS TYPE I ” Log Likelihood “ MULTI- SYSTEMS TYPE I ” (1/2)(1/2)

PARTIAL REPAIR (CM PARTIAL REPAIR (CM (GUO)) (GUO))

Page 11: PARTIE II

Log Likelihood “ MULTI- SYSTEMS TYPE I ” Log Likelihood “ MULTI- SYSTEMS TYPE I ” (2/2)(2/2)

PARTIAL REPAIR (CM PARTIAL REPAIR (CM (GUO)) (GUO))

Page 12: PARTIE II
Page 13: PARTIE II

ESTIMATIONSESTIMATIONS

Page 14: PARTIE II

GRAPHIQUES du C.I.F.GRAPHIQUES du C.I.F.

Page 15: PARTIE II
Page 16: PARTIE II
Page 17: PARTIE II

OPTIMISATION du OPTIMISATION du

REMPLACEMENTREMPLACEMENT

Page 18: PARTIE II

OPTIMISATION du OPTIMISATION du REMPLACEMENTREMPLACEMENT

Page 19: PARTIE II

OPTIMISATION du OPTIMISATION du REMPLACEMENTREMPLACEMENT

Page 20: PARTIE II
Page 21: PARTIE II
Page 22: PARTIE II

INFLUENCE SURINFLUENCE SUR L’ OPTIMISATIONL’ OPTIMISATION

Page 23: PARTIE II
Page 24: PARTIE II
Page 25: PARTIE II

VALIDATION d’un MODELE HPPVALIDATION d’un MODELE HPP

Page 26: PARTIE II

VERIFICATIONVERIFICATION

Page 27: PARTIE II

VALIDATION d’un MODELE VALIDATION d’un MODELE GRPGRP

C

?

?

Page 28: PARTIE II

RE-ANALYSERE-ANALYSE

CUMULATIF TIME ( hours )

MCF

4003002001000

50

40

30

20

10

0

Parameter, MLEMTBF

8,32612

Mean Cumulative Function " TUBER MACHINE "

LK_HPP = - 152.85

AIC_HPP = 307.7BIC_HPP = 309.52

Page 29: PARTIE II
Page 30: PARTIE II
Page 31: PARTIE II
Page 32: PARTIE II
Page 33: PARTIE II

GENERALIZED PROPORTIONAL INTENSINTIES GENERALIZED PROPORTIONAL INTENSINTIES MODELSMODELS

Whitout Covariates Whitout Covariates Log Likelihood “ SIMPLE SYSTEM ”Log Likelihood “ SIMPLE SYSTEM ”

GPIM GPIM ( CM ( CM + PM + PM ) )

Page 34: PARTIE II

EXAMPLE I : EXAMPLE I : SIMPLE SYSTEM (General SIMPLE SYSTEM (General Repair)Repair)

cf. Scheduling preventive maintenance for oil pumps using cf. Scheduling preventive maintenance for oil pumps using generalized proportional intensities models by D.F. PERCY & generalized proportional intensities models by D.F. PERCY &

B.M. ALKALI.B.M. ALKALI. International Transactions in Operational Research. 14 International Transactions in Operational Research. 14

(2007) 547-563.(2007) 547-563.

Page 35: PARTIE II

ESTIMATIONSESTIMATIONS

Page 36: PARTIE II

ESTIMATIONS « AUTEURS »ESTIMATIONS « AUTEURS »

Page 37: PARTIE II

EXAMPLE I I : EXAMPLE I I : SIMPLE SYSTEM (General SIMPLE SYSTEM (General Repair)Repair)

Cf. A pratical method of predicting the failure intensity of hydropower Cf. A pratical method of predicting the failure intensity of hydropower generating units.generating units.

By X. QIAN & Y. WUBy X. QIAN & Y. WUIEEE 2011IEEE 2011

Page 38: PARTIE II

ESTIMATIONSESTIMATIONS

Page 39: PARTIE II

ESTIMATIONS « AUTEURS »ESTIMATIONS « AUTEURS »

Page 40: PARTIE II

EXAMPLE III : EXAMPLE III : SIMPLE SYSTEM (General SIMPLE SYSTEM (General Repair)Repair)

Cf. Bayesian Prediction of the Overhaul Effect on a Repairable Cf. Bayesian Prediction of the Overhaul Effect on a Repairable SystemSystem

with Bounded Failure Intensity.with Bounded Failure Intensity.(International Journal of Quality, Statistics and Reliability (International Journal of Quality, Statistics and Reliability

2010).2010).

Page 41: PARTIE II

ESTIMATIONSESTIMATIONS

Page 42: PARTIE II

ESTIMATIONS « AUTEURS »ESTIMATIONS « AUTEURS »

Page 43: PARTIE II
Page 44: PARTIE II
Page 45: PARTIE II
Page 46: PARTIE II
Page 47: PARTIE II
Page 48: PARTIE II
Page 49: PARTIE II
Page 50: PARTIE II
Page 51: PARTIE II

OPTIMISATION de la M.P.OPTIMISATION de la M.P.

Page 52: PARTIE II

GPIM_PLP GPIM_PLP LK_V = LK_V = - 28.4311- 28.4311 = 1.13678e-14, = 1.13678e-14, = 7.68063, = 7.68063, c = 0.291656, c = 0.291656,

p = 0.432698p = 0.432698

0 50 100 150 200 250Tu.t 0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

INTENSITY u.tINTENSITY FUNCTION GPIM_PLP vs ARAinfAGAN

Page 53: PARTIE II

GPIM_PLP GPIM_PLP LK_V = LK_V = - 28.4311- 28.4311 = 1.13678e-14, = 1.13678e-14, = 7.68063, = 7.68063, c = 0.291656, c = 0.291656,

p = 0.432698p = 0.432698

Page 54: PARTIE II

SIMULATION MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION MONTE-CARLO DU MODELE DU MODELE GPIM_PLPGPIM_PLP

Page 55: PARTIE II