Part I

Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Part I

Project Initiation

2-2-22

Project Management

Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Chapter 2

Strategic Management and Project Selection

2-2-44

Problems With Multiple Projects

Delays in one project delays others Inefficient use of resources Bottlenecks in resource availability

2-2-55

Project Results

30 Percent canceled midstreamOver half of completed projects came in

up to190 percent over budgetOver half of completed projects came in

up to 220 percent late

2-2-66

Challenges

Making sure projects are closely tied to goals and strategy

How to handle the growing number of projects?

How to make these projects successful?

2-2-77

Project Management Maturity

Project management maturity refers to the mastery of skills required to manage projects competently

Number of ways to measureMost organizations do not do well

2-2-88

Project Selection and Criteria of Choice

Project selection…– Evaluating– Choosing– Implementing

Same process as other business decisions

2-2-99

Types of Companies

Companies considering projects fall into two broad categories:

– Companies whose core business is completing projects

– Companies whose core business is something else

They can also be broken down as:– Companies looking at projects to do for others– Companies looking at projects to do for themselves

2-2-1010

Model Criteria

Realism Capability Flexibility Ease of use Cost Easy computerization

2-2-1111

The Nature of Project Selection Models

Models turn inputs into outputs Managers decide on the values for the inputs

and evaluate the outputs The inputs never fully describe the situation The outputs never fully describe the expected

results Models are tools Managers are the decision makers

2-2-1212

Types of Project Selection Models

Nonnumeric modelsNumeric models

2-2-1313

Nonnumeric Models

Models that do not return a numeric value for a project to be compared with other projects

These are really not “models” but rather justifications for projects

Just because they are not true models does not make them all “bad”

2-2-1414

Types of Nonnumeric Models

Sacred Cow– A project, often suggested by the top management,

that has taken on a life of its own

Operating Necessity– A project that is required in order to protect lives or

property or to keep the company in operation

Competitive Necessity– A project that is required in order to maintain the

company’s position in the marketplace

2-2-1515

Types of Nonnumeric Models Continued

Product Line Extension– Often, projects to expand a product line are

evaluated on how well the new product meshes with the existing product line rather than on overall benefits

Comparative Benefit– Projects are subjectively rank ordered based

on their perceived benefit to the company

2-2-1616

Numeric Models

Models that return a numeric value for a project that can be easily compared with other projects

Two major categories:– Profit/profitability– Scoring

2-2-1717

Profit/Profitability Models

Models that look at costs and revenues– Payback period– Discounted cash flow (NPV)– Internal rate of return (IRR)– Profitability index

NPV and IRR are the more common methods

2-2-1818

Payback Period

The length of time until the original investment has been recouped by the project

A shorter payback period is better

2-2-1919

Payback Period Example

4000,25$

000,100$PeriodPayback

FlowCash Annual

CostProject PeriodPayback

2-2-2020

Payback Period Drawbacks

Does not consider time value of money More difficult to use when cash flows

change over time Less meaningful for longer periods of

time (due to time value of money)

2-2-2121

Discounted Cash Flow

The value of a stream of cash inflows and outflows in today’s dollars

Also know as discounted cash flow or just discounting

Widely used to evaluate projects Includes the time value of money Includes all inflows and outflows, not just

the ones through payback point

2-2-2222

Discounted Cash Flow Continued

Requires a percentage to use to reduce future cash flows– This is known as the discount rate

The discount rate may also be known as a hurdle rate or cutoff rate

There will usually be one overall discount rate for the company

2-2-2323

NPV Formula

NPV (project) 0

1 1

nt

tt

FA

k

2-2-2424

NPV Formula Terms

A0 Initial cash investment

Ft Cash flow in time period t (negative for

outflows)

k The discount rate

t The number of years of lifeA higher NPV is betterHigher the discount rate lower the NPV

2-2-2525

NPV Example

939,1$

03.015.01

000,25$000,100$ (project) NPV

8

1

t

t

2-2-2626

Internal Rate of Return [IRR]

The discount rate (k) that causes the NPV to be equal to zero

The higher the IRR, the better– While it is technically possible for a series to

have multiple IRR’s, this is not a practical issue

Finding the IRR requires a financial calculator or computer

In Excel “=IRR(Series,Guess)”

2-2-2727

Profitability Index

a k a Benefit cost ratioNPV divided by initial cash investmentRatios greater than 1.0 are good

2-2-2828

Advantages of Profitability Models

Easy to use and understand Based on accounting data and forecasts Familiar and well understood Gives a go/no-go indication Can be modified to include risk

2-2-2929

Disadvantages of Profitability Models

Ignore nonmonetary factors Some ignore time-value of money Biased toward the short-term Payback ignores cash flow after payback IRR can have multiple solutions All are sensitive to errors Nonlinear Dependent on determination of cash flows

2-2-3030

Scoring Models

Unweighted 0–1 factor modelUnweighted factor modelWeighted factor model

2-2-3131

Unweighted 0-1 Factor Model

Factors selected– Listed on a preprinted form

Raters score the project on each factorEach project gets a total scoreMain advantage is that the model uses

multiple criteriaMajor disadvantages are that it assumes

all criteria are of equal importance

2-2-3232

Unweighted 0-1 Factor Model Example

Figure 2-2

2-2-3333

Unweighted Factor Scoring Model

Replaces X’s with factor score– Typically a 1-5 scale

Column of scores is summedProjects with high scores are selected

2-2-3434

Unweighted Weighted Factor Model

Each factor is weighted the sameLess important factors are weighted the

same as important onesEasy to computeJust total or average the scores

2-2-3535

Weighted Factor Model

Each factor is weighted relative to its importance– Weighting allows important factors to stand out

A good way to include nonnumeric data in the analysis

Factors need to sum to one All weights must be set up, so higher values

mean more desirable Small differences in totals are not meaningful

2-2-3636

Weighted Factor Model Example

Figure B Page 60

2-2-3737

Advantages of Scoring Models

Allow multiple criteria Structurally simple Direct reflection of managerial policy Easily altered Allow for more important factors Allow easy sensitivity analysis

2-2-3838

Disadvantages of Scoring Models

Relative measure Linear in form Can have large number of criteria Unweighted models assume equal

importance

2-2-3939

Risk Considerations in Project Selection

Both costs and benefits are uncertain– Benefits are more uncertain

There are many ways of dealing with risk Can make estimates about the probability of

outcomes– Subjective probabilities

Uncertainty about:– Timing– What will be accomplished?– Side effects

Pro forma documents

2-2-4040

The Project Portfolio Process (PPP)

Links projects directly to the goals and strategy of the organization

Means for monitoring and controlling projects

2-2-4141

Symptoms of a Misaligned Portfolio

More projects Inconsistent determination of benefits Projects that don’t contribute to the strategy Competing projects Costs exceed benefits No risk analysis of projects Lack of tracking against the plan No client for project

2-2-4242

Purpose of Project Portfolio Process

Identify nonprojectsPrioritize list of projectsLimit number of projects Identify the real options for each project Identify projects with good fit Identify co-dependent projects

2-2-4343

Purpose of Project Portfolio Process Continued

Eliminate risky projectsEliminate projects that skip the formal

selection processKeep from overloading the organizationTo balance the resources with needsTo balance returnsTo balance short-, medium-, and long-

term returns

2-2-4444

Project Portfolio Process Steps

1. Establish a project council2. Identify project categories and criteria3. Collect project data4. Assess resource availability5. Reduce the project and criteria set6. Prioritize the projects within categories7. Select the projects to be funded and held in

reserve8. Implement the process

2-2-4545

Step 1: Establish a Project Council

Senior managementThe project managers of major projectsThe head of the Project Management

OfficeParticularly relevant general managersThose who can identify key opportunities

and risks facing the organizationAnyone who can derail the PPP later on

2-2-4646

Step 2: Identify Project Categories and Criteria

Derivate projects Platform projects Breakthrough projects R&D projects

2-2-4747

Step 3: Collect Project Data

Assemble the dataDocument assumptionsScreen out weaker projectsThe fewer projects that need to be

compared and analyzed, the easier the work of the council

2-2-4848

Step 4: Assess Resource Availability

Assess both internal and external resources

Assess labor conservativelyTiming is particularly important

2-2-4949

Step 5: Reduce the Project and Criteria Set

Organization’s goals Have competence Market for offering How risky the project is Potential partner Right resources Good fit

Use strengths Synergistic Dominated by

another Has slipped in

desirability

2-2-5050

Step 6: Prioritize the Projects Within Categories

Apply the scores and criterion weightsConsider in terms of benefits first and

resource costs secondSummarize the returns from the projects

2-2-5151

Step 7: Select the Projects to be Funded and Held in Reserve

Determine the mix of projects across the categories

Leave some resources free for new opportunities

Allocate the categorized projects in rank order

2-2-5252

Step 8: Implement the Process

Communicate resultsRepeat regularly Improve process

2-2-5353

Project Proposals

The project proposal is essentially a project bid

Putting together a project proposal requires a detailed analysis of the project

Project proposals can take weeks or months to complete

A more detailed analysis may result in not bidding on the project

2-2-5454

Project Proposal Contents

Cover letterExecutive summaryThe technical approachThe implementation planThe plan for logistic support and

administrationPast experience