35 The 48 species base on their family and their corresponding Scientific and Common name. Family Poaceae Figure 5. Imperata cylindrica Common name: Sword grass or spear grass (eng.);kogon (bis,tag.) Figure 6. Paspalum conjugatum Common name: carabao grass or buffalo grass (eng.); kulape (tag.); kauat-kauat (vis.) Figure 7. Oryza sativa Common name: Humay (Bis.), Palay (Tag.), Rice (Engl.)
46
Embed
Part 3 Of Ethnobotanical Investigation of Matigsalug Ethnic Group in Sitio Patag Barangay Datu Salumay Davao City
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
35
The 48 species base on their family and their corresponding Scientific and Common
name.
Family Poaceae
Figure 5. Imperata cylindrica
Common name: Sword grass or spear grass (eng.);kogon (bis,tag.)
Figure 6. Paspalum conjugatum
Common name: carabao grass or buffalo grass (eng.); kulape (tag.); kauat-kauat (vis.)
Figure 7. Oryza sativa
Common name: Humay (Bis.), Palay (Tag.), Rice (Engl.)
36
Figure 8. Zea mays
Common name: Aheley (Mat.); Mais (Bis.)
Figure 9. Bambusa bambos
Common name: Laak (Mat.)
Figure 10. Saccharum officinarum
Common name: Tire (Mat.); Tubo; Sugar cane (Eng.)
37
Family Fabaceae
Figure 11. Vigna cylindrica
Common name: Batong(bis.), Balatong (mat.)
Figure 12. Gliricidia sepium
Common name: Madre kakaw (Bis. and Mat.), Kakauati (Tag.), Tree of iron (Engl.)
Figure 13. Leucaena leucocephala
Common name: Ipil-ipil (bis.); white leadtree (eng.).
38
Figure 14. Tamarindus indica
Common name: Simbag (Mat.); Sampalok
Figure 15. Erythrina variegata orientalis
Common name: Dapdap tree
Family Solanaceae
Figure 16. Capsicum frutescens
Common name: Benesil (mat.); Sileng labuyo (Vis.)
39
Figure 17. Solanum molengena
Common name: Talong (bis.); eggplant (eng.)
Figure 18. Solanum lycopersicum
Common name: Kamatis (bis., mat.), Garden tomato (eng.)
Family Cucurbitaceae
Figure 19. Cucurbita maxima
Common name: Kalabasa(Tag.),
40
Figure 20. Sechium edule
Common name: Sayote
Figure 21. Luffa acutangula
Common name: Patola (Bis.), bath sponge (eng.)
Family Euphorbiaceae
Figure 22. Euphorbia hirta
Common name: Snake weed (eng), tawa-tawa (bis)
41
Figure 23. Manihot esculenta
Common name: Tire (mat.) sugar cane (eng.) kamoteng kahoy (bis.)
Figure 24. Medinilla venosa
Common name: Tungaw-tungaw (Mat.)
Figure 25. Racinus communis
Common name: Talang-talang (Mat.) Tangan-tangan (Bis.); Castor plant (Eng.)
42
Family Lamiaceae
Figure 26. Vitex negundo
Common name: Lagundi
Figure 27. Mentha arvensis Linn.
Common name: Cinderella weeds, marsh mint, pepper mint (eng.); yerba buena (tag.);
herba buena (bis.mat.)
Family Malvaceae
Figure 28. Abelmoschus escuclentus
Common name: Lady Fingers (Eng.); okra (Tag, Bis.)
43
Figure 29. Gossypium hirsutum
Common name: Gapas (bis.); upland cotton (eng.)
Family Musaceae
Figure 30. Musa acuminata
Common name: Binangay (Bis.)
Figure 31. Musa sapientum
Common name: Saba (Bis., Tag)
44
Family Labiateae
Figure 32. Coleus blumei
Common name: Mayana
Family Liliaceae
Figure 33. Allium tuberosum
Common name: Sibuyas Dahon (bis. mat.)
Family Apiaceae
Figure 34. Centella asiatica
Common name: Goto-kola
45
Family Convolvulaceae
Figure 35. Ipomea aquatica
Common name: Kangkong,(tag.); tinangkong(mat.), swamp morning glory (eng.)
Family Verbenaceae
Figure 36. Duranta erecta (Ladion, 1985)
Common name: Bulak sa puwalas (Mat.)
Family Araceae
Figure 37. Colocasia esculentaLinn.
Common name: Sole (Mat.), Gabi (Tag.)
46
Family Pandanaceae
Figure 38. Pandanus tectorius
Common name: Screw Pine (eng.) Daluos (mat.); romblon
Family Zingiberaceae
Figure 39. Zingiber officinale
Common name: Luy-a (bis.)
Family Basellaceae
Figure 40. Basella alba
Common name: Ceylon spinach (eng.); alugbati (bis.)
47
Family Amaranthaceae
Figure 41. Amaranthus caudatus
Common name: Kudyapa (Mat.), Love lies bleeding (eng.)
Family Caricaceae
Figure 42. Carica papaya
Common name: papaya (tag.); kapayas (bis.mat.)
Family Rhamnaceae
Figure 43. Berchemia scandens
Common name: Bulahen (Mat.); Ratan or Uway (Bis.)
48
Rubiaceae
Figure 44. Coffea arabica
Common name: Kape(bis, mat)
Family Bixaceae
Figure 45. Bixa orellana
Common name: Atsuete
Family Myrtaceae
Figure 46. Psidium guajava Linn.
Common name: Beyabes (Mat.); Bayabas (Bis.)
49
Family Rutaceae
Figure 47. Citrus maxima
Common name: Buongon (bis., mat); Pomelo (eng)
Family Meliaceae
Figure 48. Swietenia mahagoni
Common name: Mahogany tree (eng.); mahogany (bis.)
Family Verbenaceae
Figure 49. Gmelina arborea
Common name: Gemilina
50
Family Boraginaceae
Figure 50. Heliotropium indicum
Common name: Elepante
Family Annonaceae
Figure 51. Annona muricata
Common name: Sour Soap (eng.); banaba (bis.).
Family Apocynaceae
Figure 52. Alstonia scholaris
Common name: Dita bark (eng.); dalipoen, dita (tag.)
51
DISCUSSION
Ethnobotanical investigation was conducted on plants used by local upland tribe,
which shows a possible conclusion of the different importance and impact of the uses of
these plants which may need an attention for conservation and development for the future.
In the study, it was observed that most of the members of the Matigsalug community rely
on plants found in their surroundings especially from the forest. It was said that the forest
is their primary source of living (Patinio, 2009). From the food that they will be eating,
medicine for different ailments, source of income, fuel wood, down to ancillary uses
(such as construction materials and crafts).
From the 48 species of plants, which has multiple uses in the community, it was
recorded that most species are used for food. This conforms to the study of Prigge,
Langenberger, and Martin (2005). They explain the group of Bontoc use 102 species for
food, the Ifugao use 56 species, the Tasaday has 42 species and Mansaka has 31 species
of food plant- comprise a large number of species in this category than the farmers,
because they live in isolation from the mainstream society. They heavily relied on natural
products for their needs. In the community, each family have their own ''uma'' or what we
call farmland where they plant vegetative plants (some are cultivated) and harvested it.
Farmland is far from their houses, the boys of the family are accounted to take in charge
in their farm. Others sell out to the market which varies the productivity of the plant, but
mostly they plant for the benefit of their family. Primary species found in their farmland
are mainly the Oriza sativa, Colocassia esculenta, Zea May, Manihot esculenta, and
Saccharum officinarum. Mostly found both in their farmland and their yard.
52
The second category which is second of the largest number of plant species in the
data are the medicinal plant species. In the study it was recorded that there are 20 species
of medicinal plants (please see table 2A). The knowledge of the medicinal plant of the
community is not homogeneously distributed, mostly men and some are women,
especially the old ones have these knowledge about the medicinal procedures and also the
species of the plants that will be used. This is consistent with earlier reports of other
researchers. One of this is the study of the group of Khan, Hussain, Mujtaba and M.A
Khan (2010). They have recorded that the knowledge of medicinal plant are mostly
distributed by gender, it was said that men, especially the old ones are more informative
than the women in the area. In the study of Prigge, Langenberger, and Martin (2005). It
was recorded that there is a comparably small number of medicinal species used by
indigenous people, because of the reason that these indigenous people were not willing to
share their information on medicinal plants with foreign researchers. Base on that study
that half of the species of the medicinal plants are also commonly used in the lowland
farmers for the same medicinal application, so there is an assumption that the
communities of farmers used are based on some bioactive principle. Similarly, it is
observed that some of the procedures and species of plants are being used by other
communities based on the study of Fortugaliza (2009) and Mayol (2010). The Matigsalug
community has restrictions and they gave limited information about their medicinal
species of plant and procedures, because they believe that only the Anituwen and
Tumanuren or Medicinal Doctor of the Group, knows what are the species of the plant
that will be used, for there is exclusively between the Manama (God) and tribal healers
(Patinio, 2009). Moreover, Sarahan (2010), concluded some of their practices are now
53
diminishing, for the reason that there is no right place to go as forest are now declining
and denuded and the community now exposed to modern civilization.
Using plants as ancillary is one of the plant extraction and one of the factors of the
damage of the forest or ''Puwalas''. In the study it was recorded that there are 13 species
used as house construction including its different tools that can be made on that species
and 3 species is used to make crafts. Some species for construction are said to be new in
their forest 2 of which are the Sweetenia mahogany , from the family of Meliaceae and
Gmelina arborea which is from Verbenacea family. It was also observed that there are 2
species from the Poaceae family, and these are the Bambusa bambos which is common
for house walling and flooring and Imperata cylindrica which is commonly used for
roofing. In the ethnobotanical inventory of Himalayan Region in Pakistan, it was
recorded that there are twelve species utilized for construction purposes. Although their
houses are made of stones, they use timber for supporting. The timber is the most
important component of the forest, but timber ''mafia'' is active in illegal trades which
results to the decline of their forest (Khan, Hussain et. al, 2010). Also in the Matigsalug
community, the group of the Datu`s and their Elders believe that there is a big difference
of the forest (Puwalas) today and in the past. There are some parts of the forest that the
original species of plants (hardwoods and medicines) was diminishing because of illegal
loggers in earlier decades. It was proven by the calamities that they are encountering
nowadays. Such as landslides, flash floods and drought (Cadirao, 2010). Moreover, the
community now lead by the Datu`s, Bae`s and Elders, are more concerned in conserving
their area by having activities or programs such as ``Bantay gubat'' and more.
54
In collecting data, the researcher encounter some problems, it was said that
invaders of the forest must perform a rituals first before entering the forest. For the
limited time and finance, the researcher could no longer sustain that. Moreover, some of
the species are being documented outside the forest vicinity. Two of which are used for
making handicraft. The species Berchemia scandens from Rhamnaceae family,for
making furniture’s and Alstonia scholaris from Apocynaceae family for making
handicraft and also used for construction.
In sorting the data and basis of the interview, there are other species of plants that
can only be seen in the forest. The community called it hardwood because it is taller,
harder and larger. They called it Indaluhong and Malibato. The stem of Indaluhong is
used as “lubukan” or mortar and Malibato is used “pangdukduk” or pestle both are used
in grinding the rice. Also the community observes some of the endemic species like
Lauaan and Almasiga or they call it Salumayug. They said that these trees are among of
the declining hardwoods in their
55
CHAPTER V
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, RECCOMENDATION
Summary
Along the interviews, observations and documentation, there are 48 species of
plants were documented. These species belongs to 25 families and representing the 46
genera. Mostly of the plants belongs to the Poaceae family which has 6 number species
and second belongs to the Fabaceae family which has 5 species of plants. Along with this,
plants are characterized based on the utilization of the community, maybe it for food,
for medicine, construction materials and other uses of this plant, for fuel and lastly plant
that source of their income. In the data, it shows that mostly of the plant are used as food
which has 26 species of plant and second is for medicine which has 21 species. Thirteen
are used for construction, 13 also are used as economic plant and 8 is for fuel.
Conclusion
Forty- eight species of plant samples were collected. Most species are used as
food plant and there are about twenty six (26) species for this category. Second is for
medicine, which has 21 species. Thirteen for construction materials and source of income,
eight are for fuel and lastly three species are used for handicraft and has an alternative
uses in the community. This 48 species belongs to twenty-five (25) families and the
dominating family that is mostly used is from the family of Poaceae or the grass plants
which has a big role as a food crops. Assessment of conservation status and vulnerable
species of the area is needed. The diversity of the floras needs to be monitor and be
56
documented over the change of time for the community and for us to be aware of the
biodiversity problem and for conservation purposes.
Recommendations
The area is rich of diverse floras and it is recommended that:
To have an environmental education program for the awareness of the
community on how to improve their practices for protection and conservation of
the floral species.
The LGU`s and NGO`s who is now entering the vicinity of the Matigsalug
group should work hand in hand in assisting the community in preserving and
documenting the indigenous knowledge especially in line in biodiversity.
A survey must also be conducted in this area to determine the species richness
and its distribution.
57
LITERATURE CITED
Brands, S.J. (comp.) 1989-present. The Taxonomicon. Universal Taxonomic
Services, Zwaag, The Netherlands. Accessed January 11, 2012
Biota of North America Program. Retrieved from http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile
on July 2011.
Botanical and Tropical Seeds. Retrieved from http://www.tropilab.com on July
2011.
Cabauatan, G, Jane and del Rosario, M. Romualdo. 2007. Ethnobotanical
Investigations Among the Ybanag Ethnic Minority in the Northern Cagayan
Valley,Philippines; Volume 55 pp. 23-36;Printed in the Philippines ISSN
0065-1370.
Cadirao, Roween M. 2010. Climate Change and Farming Practices of Matigsalug
in Datu Salumay, Marilog District, Davao City.pp 9
Cimafranca, Irish A. and Ompoy, Neliem M. 2008. Inventory of Ferns
(Pteridophytes) in Purok 1 Bagadihan, Marilg Disrict Davao City.pp. 9
Coe, G, Felix and Anderson, J, Gregory. Oct. - Dec., 1999. Ethnobotany of the
Sumu (Ulwa) of Southeastern Nicaragua and Comparisons with Miskitu
Plant Lore; Economic Botany, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 363-386.
Cunningham, B, Anthony. 2001. Applied Ethnobotany, People, Wild Plant use and
conservation.
Encarnacion, Carlos. 1999. Eco - Enterprises and Indigenous Peoples, Two Case
Studies of the BCN Experience in the Philippine Upland. URL: