Parking Guidance System Group Member: Chan Chun Kit (50115211) Cheung Chi Ming (50165054) Kwong Yee Fai (50177772) Lai Chung Wing (50276497) Sum Kai Yiu (50369026) Yiu Chi Kan (50524565) Course Instructor: Dr. John K L Ho MEEM5001 Enterprise Engineering Strategy Parking Parking City City
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Parking Guidance System
Group Member:Chan Chun Kit (50115211)Cheung Chi Ming (50165054) Kwong Yee Fai (50177772)Lai Chung Wing (50276497)Sum Kai Yiu (50369026)Yiu Chi Kan (50524565)
Course Instructor: Dr. John K L Ho
MEEM5001 Enterprise Engineering Strategy
ParkingParking CityCity
• A newly established engineering company in HK in providing effective parking guidance system for all types of parking facilities.
• Shareholders of the company are graduates of City University of Hong Kong.
• No experiences in business, but the system is creative & able to meet the customers’ needs.
Company Background
Mission Statement
• To be a pioneer for providing efficient, competitive technology and engineering services to multi-storey car parks through application of parking guidance system.
• To recommend & promote the use of innovative parking guidance system in Hong Kong.
• To optimize the use of parking spaces & reduce the time in searching free parking space by introducing parking guidance system.
• To gain profit for the newly established company in HK on a 39% rate of return in the first three year of business.
Goals
Objectives
• Guide the driver to find a parking space more efficient & convenient.
• Optimize the use of car parking spaces• Provide a long term car parking space solution for
users & operators.• Prevent a long queue of cars from forming at the
entrance point
Environment Analysis
• Finding a space in a car park can
be difficult and stressful
• Reduce the time of searching space
in order to reduce parking time
• Look for a solution for reduce air and noise pollution from vehicle in urban area
• No similar parking management system in HK
• Suitable for multi-storey car park in crowed district e.g. Central, Mongkok, etc
Environment Analysis
• Many car park developers:- Improve the facilities- No idea to implement the system- Look for a solution for reduce
traffic problem outside highly-utilized car parks- Seek for improving the usage efficiency - Seek for efficiency and flexible management system - Increase the rate of filling parking space- Improve customer service and customer satisfaction
– People: People: Services Team (on-site, remote and hotline Services Team (on-site, remote and hotline support)support)
Framework of OrganizationFramework of Organization
• 3.) Business Development3.) Business Development – System Design : simple but innovative, System Design : simple but innovative,
new system for car park management in new system for car park management in HK, suitable for multi-storey car parksHK, suitable for multi-storey car parks
– Customer Services : meet customersCustomer Services : meet customers’’ expectation through questionnaires expectation through questionnaires
– Assembly & Test : local design Assembly & Test : local design – Operations : in-house staffOperations : in-house staff
Quality Management
• ISO 9000 certified
• EMSD’s approved system design
• All technicians are registered electrical workers
• All components & parts are RoHS & WEEE compliance Product
Develop & Evaluate Strategic Alternatives
• Two Strategic Alternatives for Operation:1.in-house engineering services2.completely out-sourcing
• Problems on Strategic Alternatives: 1.control of quality2.communication3.competition4.coordination5.costs
Alternatives for Operation
Pro Cons
* have own facilities/equipment
* quicker reaction to problems
* better control
* good communication
* have own facilities/equipment
* higher business security
* high set up cost
* high training cost
* cost on own facilities/equipment * no external technical support
* complicated management
Strategy of In-house Services
Alternatives for Operation
Pro Cons
* low set up cost
* low training cost
* less own facilities/equipment * external technical support
* trained personnel available
* flexible
* loss of direct control* quicker reaction to problems
* readily fixed costs
* hidden costs
* risk
Strategy of Out Source Services
Evaluation of Various Strategies
Management StrategiesAlternatives of Operation
In-house Staff Out-sourcing
control of quality
communication
competition
coordination
costs
Technology BackgroundParking Guidance SystemA displaying system that provides the latest parking information and directs the drivers to free parking space along the shortest possible route
Technology Background
Vehicle Detection Technology
Ultrasonic Object Detector Technology
Inductive Loop Detector Technology
Inductive Loop Detector
• A coil of wire is buried under the parking lot and connected to a roadside control box
Ultrasonic Detector
Ultrasonic Detector
- Install in the ceiling on each parking lot- Ultrasonic frequencies (25.8kHz or 24.7kHz)- To detect the presence of car in the
corresponding parking lot- LED is integrated in detector • to indicated two possible states
Free (Available) or Occupied
- Low construction/installation cost compared with inductor loop detector
Ultrasonic vs. Inductive Loop Criteria for comparison include:
Data accuracy, Environmental effect, Reliability, System expendability, Cost and Ease of installation and maintenance.
**Ultrasonic Inductive loop
Data accuracy Good (98% or above) Good (98% or above)
Environmental Effect Low Low
Reliability Good Good
System expendability Good Medium
Ease of installation/maintenance
Easy Difficult
Construction cost Medium High
Vehicle Detection Technology
• Ultrasonic Detector is selected
in our parking guidance system
Reference:
** Naoyuki Ushio and Toshiyuki Shimizu, “Loop vs ultrasonic in Chicago: Ultrasonic vehicle detector field test isolating diffused reflection and enduring harsh environment”, 1997
System Architecture of Parking Guidance System
System Architecture of Parking Guidance System
System Architecture of Parking Guidance System
Digital Display and Signage
Financial AnalysisSource of Funding
Friends
Bank Loans
Government Funding Scheme
Easy to borrow
Depends on degree of friendship
High interest rate for small business
More flexible
Strict application requirement
Tailor-made loan scheme
Financial Analysis
Initial Investment HK $ Annual Expenses HK $
Office Hardware 80,000 Direct Cost
Computer Software with license 80,000 Labor salary 648,000
R & D cost 60,000 Other Direct Cost 30,000
Marketing Promotion 50,000 Indirect Cost
Working Capital 50,000 System Maintenance 10,000
Quality Control & Testing 10,000 Marketing Promotion 10,000
Taxes and insurance 60,000
Other Indirect Cost 30,000
Total 330,000 Total 788,000
Financial Analysis
Net income from each project HK $
1. Ultrasonic detector 126,250
2. Microprocessor-based controller 7,500
3. Equipment rack/housing for the controller 1,500
4. Central workstation sever computer 12,000
5. Parking guidance system software with 1 year license 28,000
6. Hubs/Routers 1,000
7. Building service provisions 85,000
8. Related shielded cables 54,400
9. Uninterruptible power supply 27,000
10. LED display board 13,000
11. Consultancy and installation & testing 65,000
Total cost for 1 project 420,650
Markup price for each project: 40% on the total project cost
Selling Price = HK$ 420,650 X 1.4
= HK$ 588,910
Total Income from *projects each year:
Total Income = HK$ 588,910 X 5
= HK$ 2,944,550
* Assume 5 projects each year
Financial Analysis
Income Calculation:
Consultancy Income: 80% of the project cost category 11 Consultancy Income = HK$ 65,000 X 80% = HK$ 52,000 Markup Profit = HK$ 168,260
Total Profit for each year = HK$ (52,000 + 168,260) X 5 = HK$ 1,101,300
Net Profit = Total Profit – Total Expenses = HK$ 1,101,300 – HK$ 788,000 = HK$ 313,300
Financial AnalysisNet Profit for each project:
Financial Analysis
Payback Period:
Year Cash Inflow
HK$
Cash Outflow
HK$
Net Cash Flow
HK$
1 440,520 1,118,000 (677,480)
2 1,101,300 788,000 (364,180)
3 1,101,300 788,000 (50,880)
4 1,101,300 788,000 262,420
Payback period: 3 + [50,880/(1,101300 - 788,000)] X 12 = 3 year and 2 months
Time ScheduleMonth
1Tasks
Stage 1: Requirement Study (30 days)(1.1) Operation and Process Review(1.2) Technology Review(1.3) Requirement Checklist Finalization
Stage 2: System design and development (100 days)(2.1) Design of System(2.2) Coding of System (2.3) Testing version/ Demo Version Roll Up
Stage 3: System testing (60 days)(3.1) Design of Testing Plan(3.2) System Acceptance Testing and Pilot Run (3.3) System Fine-tuning(3.4) System Final Version Release
Stage 4: Training and marketing (60 days)(4.1) Promotion Start(4.2) System Training for Supporting Staff
Month2
Month3
Month4
Month5
Month6
• Strategy plans are fully achieve the mission statements & Strategy plans are fully achieve the mission statements & objectivesobjectives
• The functions of the Parking Guidance System is based on The functions of the Parking Guidance System is based on the customers needthe customers need
• No market competitor as a result of high profit margin No market competitor as a result of high profit margin tends to shorten the payback periodtends to shorten the payback period