Top Banner
Parameter Setting and the Subset Principle
33
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Parameter setting

Parameter Setting and the Subset Principle

Page 2: Parameter setting

Some observations

• Language is complicated

DP

PP

N’

N

NP

visit

DPhis

DP D’

D

DP

[poss]

to the hospital

i

ti

VP

IP

V

V’

I’

I

[past] DP

her

DP

upset

j

tj

Page 3: Parameter setting

Some observations

• Children always succeed

• Children arrive at the same language as the rest of their speech community

This is remarkable, given the data that children learn language from.

Page 4: Parameter setting

The poverty of the stimulus

• children exposed to data containing errors

• different children exposed to different data

• children don’t get negative evidence• children aren’t directly rewarded • children get incomplete data

Page 5: Parameter setting

The poverty of the stimulus problem

A paradox: Children reliably acquire a complex system from a degenerate set of data.

Page 6: Parameter setting

The poverty of the stimulus problem

A solution: Universal Grammar

Children are born with a language instinct

Page 7: Parameter setting

Language acquisition

An interaction between grammar and data S --> NP VPNP --> DET NVP --> V NP PPPP --> P NPS --> S and SNP --> NP andNP

Page 8: Parameter setting

Apparent Complexity

• “A striking discovery of modern generative grammar is that natural languages seem to be built on the same basic plan. Many differences among languages represent not separate designs but different settings of a few "parameters" that allow languages to vary, or different choices of rule types from a fairly small inventory of possibilities.”– Pinker, Language Acquisition

Page 9: Parameter setting

Universal Grammar: the basic idea

Input(data)

Output(grammar)

Acquisition device

“An engineer faced with the problem of designing a device for meeting the given input-output conditions would naturally conclude that the basic properties of the output are a consequence of the design of the device. Nor is there any plausible alternative to this

assumption” Chomsky (1967)

Page 10: Parameter setting

Universal Grammar

Innate linguistic knowledge which guides children during language acquisition.

• defines the range of possible human languages

• gives an acquisition procedure for picking the correct grammar (LAD)

Page 11: Parameter setting

UG and language acquisition

• UG helps in two ways:–Principles

• Certain invariant properties of language.

–Parameters• A small set of dimensions along

which languages can vary.

Page 12: Parameter setting

A Principle: structure-dependency

Syntactic operations depend on constituent structure.

Example: yes/no questions

Isi the girl ti tall?

Isi the dog that is in the garden ti barking?

Formed by moving main clause auxiliary verb to front of subject.

Not, e.g., moving the first aux to the front.

Page 13: Parameter setting

Structure-dependency and stimulus poverty

The crucial type of example:• Isi the dog that is in the garden ti

barking?

“You can go over a vast amount of data of experience without ever finding such a case ” Chomsky, in Piattelli-Palmarini (1980)

Page 14: Parameter setting

Another Principle: recursion

All languages are recursive.• it’s in UG• kids know it in advance

Page 15: Parameter setting

Principles: a summary

• UG contains information on invariant properties of language– Principles

• All languages have these properties– universal

• Children don’t have to learn these properties– innate knowledge

Page 16: Parameter setting

Parameters

Language acquisition is “the growth of cognitive structures along an internally directed course under the triggering … effect of the environment ” (Chomsky 1980)

Page 17: Parameter setting

Parameter: head-complement ordering

The head-order parameter has two settings:• head-initial• head-final

Page 18: Parameter setting

Typological data

From Dryer (1992)

Class Percentage of Genera

Verb-Object, Preposition 33%

Verb-Object, Postposition 3%

Object-Verb, Preposition 3%

Object-Verb, Postposition 61%

Page 19: Parameter setting

Parameter: head-complement ordering

What order do heads and complements appear in?

IP

CP

C’

C

if

VP

IP

I’

I

will

DP

VP

V’

V

write

DP

PP

P’

P

to

Page 20: Parameter setting

Parameter: head-complement ordering

What order do heads and complements appear in?

IP

CP

C’

C

ka

VP

IP

I’

I

-u

DP

VP

V’

V

kak

DP

PP

P’

P

ni

Page 21: Parameter setting

The null subject parameter

• “…all languages in some sense have subjects, but there is a parameter corresponding to whether a language allows the speaker to omit the subject in a tensed sentence with an inflected verb. This "null subject" parameter (sometimes called "PRO-drop") is set to "off" in English and "on" in Spanish and Italian (Chomsky, 1981).”– Pinker, Language Acquisition

Page 22: Parameter setting

The null subject parameter

Yes: tensed clauses can have null subjectsNo: every tensed clause must have an overt subject

No setting: English (French, Edo, …)(1) he speaks(2) * speaks

Yes setting: Italian (Spanish, Navajo, …) (3) lui parla(4) parla

Page 23: Parameter setting

The null subject parameter

Dummy subjects

(1)it is raining / * is raining

(2)piove

Non-movement of subjects

(1)Alex will come / * will come Alex

(2)Alex verrá / verrá Alex

Page 24: Parameter setting

The null subject parameter

• The best parameters are those which have several different effects. There are a number of things which seem to “cluster” with the availability of null subjects (providing clues as to what the actual parameter is).– null subjects are allowed– no pleonastic (dummy) pronouns (it’s raining)– rich verbal agreement– verb can precede subject in declaratives (came

John)– Embedded subject can be questioned with overt that

Page 25: Parameter setting

A parameter space

polysynthesis

head directionality

subject side

verb attraction

subject placement serial verb

null subject

yesno

Mohawk, Warlpirifinalinitial

Japanese, Turkishinitial final

Malagasy, Tzotzilyes

no

no yes

English Edo, Khmer

highlow

Welsh, Zapotec no yes

French Spanish, Romanian

Page 26: Parameter setting

Parameter Setting

• How does the child set the parameters?– Settings ordered– Default setting– Settings change with positive evidence.

Page 27: Parameter setting

The Subset Principle

• What’s the default setting?– No negative evidence.– Nothing to change a parameter setting

from superset to subset.– A null-subject language is a superset of a

language that requires subjects.

Page 28: Parameter setting

Parameters in L2 Learning

• Languages differ in the settings of parameters (as well as in the pronunciations of the words, etc.).

• To learn a second language is to learn the parameter settings for that language.

• Where do you keep the parameters from the second, third, etc. language? You don’t have a single parameter set two different ways, do you?

• “Parameter resetting” doesn’t mean monkeying with your L1 parameter settings, it means setting your L2 parameter to its appropriate setting.

Page 29: Parameter setting

Four views on the role of L1 parameters

• UG is still around to constrain L2/IL, parameter settings of L1 are adopted at first, then parameters are reset to match L2.

• UG does not constrain L2/IL but L1 does, L2 can adopt properties of L1 but can’t reset the parameters (except perhaps in the face of brutally direct evidence, e.g., headedness).

• IL cannot be described in terms of parameter settings—it is not UG-constrained.

• UG works the same in L1A and L2A. L1 shouldn’t have any effect.

Page 30: Parameter setting

Some parameters that have been looked at in L2

• Pro drop (null subject) parameter (whether empty subjects are allowed; Spanish yes, English no)

• Head parameter (where the head is in X-bar structure with respect to its complement; Japanese head-final, English head-initial)

• ECP/that-trace effect (*Who did you say that t left? English: yes, Dutch: no).

• Subjacency/bounding nodes (English: DP and IP, Italian/French: DP and CP).

Page 31: Parameter setting

Null subject parameter

• Spanish (+NS) L1 learning English (–NS)– An error constituting transfer of +NS would be omitting a

subject in an English sentence, which requires a subject.

• English (–NS) L1 learning Spanish (+NS)– What would count as an error constituting transfer of +NS?

Trickier—have to look for context where Spanish would definitely drop the subject, and see if English speakers incorrectly retain the subject. Even then, does that mean the Spanish learner doesn’t have the parameter down, or just hasn’t worked out the pragmatics of where a subject should be dropped?

Page 32: Parameter setting

Principles and Parameters: summary

Principles: provided by UG, invariantParameters: provided by UG, languages

vary in parameter settings

P&P explains: • language acquisition • language universals• linguistic variation

Page 33: Parameter setting

Universal Grammar: summary

• The poverty of the stimulus problem– language can’t be learned purely from the

data children are exposed to.

• Children must have innate linguistic knowledge– Universal Grammar

• Principles and Parameters approach– one way of thinking about UG