Completely rewritten ver. 5, after the biased reviewer claiming:
that the time of electrons speed (actually few mm/s) to reach from
the switch to fuse (actually the time of electrons is several hours
or days months or years, depending of the length of t the circuit
total length of the loop), what matters is the time of propagation
of the field which of the of 250,000 Km/s, if the signal is send by
E/W waves, this speed is c, the velocity light, which is invariant
under the Lorentz transformations, actually the initial goal of the
transformations, which the reviewer refers to, as a must, but
obviously has no idea of the said purpose-goal. Therefore the
reviewer has an ignorance and confusion in reference to to review
such an article. RELATIVISTIC OBSERVERS DANGEROUS ILLUSIONS AND
SEVERAL DANGEROUS CONTRADICTIONS. P.T. Pappasa, T.P. Pappasb, L.P.
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]:In this paper, it is shown for
different observers based on different orientation, different
events happen, dangerous illusions. Special Relativity creates
unaccepted paradoxes-contradictions, via elementary standard
calculations. These paradoxes-contradictions may have unpredictable
dangerous consequences in major applications, for example those of
CERN. To the extend, if cosmos-creation incorporated Special
Relativity, would have never been created.CONSIDERATION:
Two clocks are connected to a common mechanism with an axis
joining them. A stationary observer S1 notice identical times
recorded on them. The common axis is oriented in the direction of
the velocity u of a moving inertial frame S2. According to Special
Relativity1,2,3 the moving inertial frame S2 notices two different
times on the two clocks, and the common axis having been twisted
another bizarre but known phenomenon6,7. Relevant remarks: However,
we ignore this paradoxical situation as another small-negligible
and irrelevant situation, as clocks could function in various
different ways. The rotation could be inverted and/or magnified by
one extra cog-wheel in the mechanism of the clocks or of one clock.
The clocks could show time by the turning clock-wise as normal
clocks turn cw or counter-clock-wise ccw the normal clock rotate
i.e. the opposite direction the normal clocks rotate. Clocks could
be in pairs, one registering the time turning cw, and the other
ccw. Then which way will the bar twist? For both ways, one clock
will contract time, and the other the opposite i.e. will dilate
time. A 100% clear contradiction paradox of S.R. for the
fast-moving observer S2 and the previous reviewers suggested
relevant references 5 and 6!
Another inertial moving observer S3, Fig. 1, and with velocity v
but perpendicularly to the axis of the clocks in S1, sees identical
times for the two clocks and no twist of the axis. If the clocks
are located on the rotating Earth, then the clocks should appear to
jump back and forth according to the orientation of the Earth
relative to the fast moving alternatively observers S2 and S3,
causing one illusion to one of the observers each time,
successively. This a previously unheard, bizarre and paradoxical
phenomenon that may cause successive explosions or not to one of
the S2 and S3, each time according to the orientation of the
rotating Earth.Fig. 1. Clocks with a common axis connected to a
central clock mechanism. Time difference for observer S2 for the
two clocks: t2=(t1-x1u/c2), t2= -x1u/c2, for t1=0. Resulting to a
new phenomenon: the twisting common axis for observer S2, only.
Fig. 2.The two clocks are slave controlled symmetrically by a
central transmitting radio waves station.Fig. 3.The two clocks are
connected in a circuit with a battery and explosive packet of
dynamites, via two switches on the clocks each, in such a way to
close electrically the circuit Fig. 4 and 5. When both clocks
indicate 12 oclock and cause a strong explosion. Observer S2 never
observes both clocks showing simultaneously 12 oclock and never
sees the explosion. However, observers, S1 and S3 see the
explosion.Therefore, Observers S1, S2 and S3 are not equivalent,
despite Special Relativity claims. Therefore, this is an unaccepted
paradox-contradiction of Special Relativity, causing different
illusions to equivalent assumed observers.This illusion also
depends on how observer S2 calculates his results. Assume he
firstly observes the contracted lengths: x1/(u) = x2/(u), because
they were initially equally long: x1 = x2 when stationary. Observer
S2 observes that light covers two opposite and equal moving
distances at speed u, at the same time t, He observes the light
signal arrives at times t + t1 and t t2, the moment t, the source
emits the light. Now the same school boys-observers of S2 and with
a different legitimated calculation using the school formula as an
internal normal formula of the S2 inertial frame, with exclusive
use only for it: legitimate school boy formula: elapsed time =
actual covered distance/velocity, (1)That Einstein2 did not exempt
(1) from his theory of Special Relativity. Neither, today
literature2 does so. (1) is actually, equivalent to the standard
definition of velocities in the whole of Physics.Some observers
conclude that both clocks register different times and consequently
and dangerously, they also do not notice the explosion.Calculation
of the two clock time deviations t1 and t2, Fig. 2: t2= [x2/(u) +
t2u]/c and t1=[ x1/(u) - t1u]/c: ct2 ut2 = x2/(u): t2 =
[x2/(u)]/(c-u) (2), and t1 = [x1/(u)/(c+u): (3), the two clocks of
S1 registered the clock time deviations (3) and (2) for S2, other
than the predictions of Lorentz transformations2 for S2: t1=
-(u)x1u/c2 and t2= (u)x2u/c2, respectively, - two contradictions
for legitimate school boy direct calculations, using formula (1)
and Lorentz transformations2 !
Fig. 4.Observer S2 does not see an explosion. Because according
to him, the two clocks have a time difference, and the two switches
are not both closed to establish the circuit:
t2=(t1-x1u/c2)=-x1u/c2, (1).For t1=0. See Fig. 2.
Fig. 5.Observers S1 and S3 see an explosion. But not S2.
Let us consider that the left system S2 sees the x1 optically
contracted according to Lorentz of course, and in the meantime
moves with velocity u: Let t is the time difference seeing the two
ends of it.t = (x1/-tu)/c = x1/c -tu/c:t(1+u/c) = x1/c:t =
x1/c(1+u/c) =x1/(c+u): so there is a delay, due to seeing
simultaneously by receiving from both ends ofx1, signals at time
difference: t=x1/(c+u) (2)So, the above result is also another
contradiction to Lorentz transformation result (1) which is: t
=-x1u/c2, different than the result (2).Suppose now, the two clocks
in system S1, are connected by two symmetrical light signals,
sending simultaneously ticks from the central oscillator mechanism.
For all inertial observers the rate (frequency) of the clocks
should be the same. For they should receive signals at the same
rate, as each actually should see the central mechanism kicking
rate, as it is the practice for the countries with one time-zone of
the planet earth or the worldwide astronomy observatory clocks
indicating the Universal Greenwich time that is broadcasted by a
central station from Greenwich, London, U.K.So now the two clocks
possibly display different times, but at identical flow time rate
that corresponds to the central oscillator relative to each
observer. The two clocks will show identical times each for all the
observers. However, if we set next to each clock an independent
self-working clock, then the independent clocks will show the same
or different times, according to the Observer of either S1, S2, S3.
So according to relativity, time of clocks depends on whether they
are a slave (as the clocks of one-time zone countries are slaves of
time broadcasting station) to an oscillator. When two clocks
display the same time, particularly when they are digital
displaying digits and not analogs clocks. All observers of Special
Relativity might differ in reading correspondingly time among
themselves, corresponding on the velocity and distance delay of the
master clock transmission station to local clocks.
CONCLUSION:According to Special Relativity, inertial observers
based on their velocity and their orientation, are not equivalent
and different things-illusions happen or do not happen, such as a
dangerous nuclear or a strong explosion may happen for them or not.
Also, time of clocks may depend on the actual mechanism of clocks,
producing unacceptable bizarre phenomena-various paradoxes and also
making unacceptable, bizarre, dangerous the theory of Special
Relativity itself, which predicts a virtual reality for its
inertial observers, depending on the way the observer performs his
legitimate calculations, as in the above different contradicting
results. The equivalence of all inertial observers for Special
Relativity is invalidated by the same theory, as well as,
destroying the isotropy of physics for flat space4,5. Our society
is exposed to unpredictable danger, depending how calculations are
made in its critical nuclear centers, as in fact in such centers
has already happened a seriously unpredictable accident today,
Chernobyl, Fukushima.
Our cosmos creation, incorporating the dangerous and
schizophrenic theory of Special Relativity regulating time in its
relativistic way, would have been arbitrary and also schizophrenic,
and would have never happened or completed the purpose of
creation.
Finally, the critic of Special Relativity becomes a funny story
with all the bizarre and paradoxical illusions.
The great scientist Galileo Galilei was whispering EPPUR SI
MUOVE, while the non-scientist inquisition was censoring him and
willing to pass on to him the ultimate judgment. This event is
continuously repeated until today, not by an inquisition, but now,
by science and scientist themselves, who shout S.R. is our holy
cow. As a confirmation or not: let's see whether reviewers
scientists will reject this document and on what scientific
arguments, or they will not reject it.
REFERENCES:1. A. Einstein, ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF THE MOVING
BODIES, 1905, http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/,
2. Google search: direct Lorentz transformations, inverse Lorentz
transformation: particular:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-to-get-inverse-lorentz-tranformation-from-direct-lorentz-transformation.188338/.
3. Also:
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node110.html.
4. Google search: Isotropy of physics for flat space isotropy of
physics for flat space.5. International Journal of
TheoreticalPhysics. 1973, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 259.6.
http://postimg.org/image/8gdx0j3gd/7. Wolfgang Rindler "Relativity:
Special, General, and Cosmological" (second edition), (ISBN
0198567316) page 74, problem 3.7.