A PAPER PRESENTED TO THE PHILIPPINE LEAGUE OF SOCIOLOGY STUDENTS (NATIONAL CONVENTION) The AMPATUAN, Maguindanao MASSACRE: A PSYCHOANALYTIC-SOCIOLOGICAL STUDY OF WHY PEOPLE DO HEINOUS CRIMES. Under the subfield Crimino-forensic sociology. PRESENTED BY: EMMANUEL S. CALIWAN BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN SOCIOLOGY PUP-MABINI CAMPUS, MANILA. 0
29
Embed
Paper Ampatuan Massacre a Psycho Anal Tic Sociology
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
A PAPER
PRESENTED TO
THE PHILIPPINE LEAGUE OF
SOCIOLOGY STUDENTS
(NATIONAL CONVENTION)
The AMPATUAN, Maguindanao MASSACRE:
A PSYCHOANALYTIC-SOCIOLOGICAL STUDY OF WHY PEOPLE DO HEINOUS CRIMES.
Under the subfield Crimino-forensic sociology.
PRESENTED BY:
EMMANUEL S. CALIWAN
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN SOCIOLOGY
PUP-MABINI CAMPUS, MANILA.
0
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
Understanding why people do things a normal person would oath not to do is very difficult
task indeed but sociology as a behavioral science need to understand things like this so that
it could dispel myths surrounding such phenomenon. Contrary to popular belief that such acts
like heinous crimes are done by people who are possessed by the devil or the likes of it.
Sociology believes the contrary is true that human beings put in a right situation and
circumstances, and social forces at work are capable of such evil. As S.S.A Jason Gideon
puts it “Evil is not a cultural thing it is rooted in our human nature.”(Criminal minds EP.19
season 1). This paper explores a very recent unfathomable and inhumane like social
phenomenon that happened in the Philippines particularly that of the Maguindanao province.
The researcher for the sake of accuracy calls this as THE AMPATUAN, MAGUINDANAO
MASSACRE a crime that even in our wildest dreams we don’t situate in the Philippine setting.
Further more the researcher departs from a pure psychological explanations and focus
instead on a psychoanalytic-sociology of men who are not in a war yet always at “war” and
thus create evil1.
This paper is an initial step towards a convergence of psychoanalytical theory and
sociological theory on its quest to give real and critical explanation on the mystery that is
human behavior. Premises of nature-nurture integration, subjective-objective integration, and
neo Freudian psychoanalysis (particularly that Erich Fromm) and sociological social
psychology will be seen to play very important factors in unfolding to answer to our question
that we situates under the behavioral studies2 division. This paper aims at bringing sociology
closer to what it is all about a scientific and critical study of human behavior in the context of
societal forces. It is also my aim in this paper to bring Erich Fromm back in the periphery of
sociological thought. And the only way to bring him back is to use his theories which are all of
great relevance on the understanding of social phenomenon.
1 For the readers this paper aims not to give an apology of what the Ampatuans have done. I didn’t write this paper in light of“ sociology in bad faith” to use Peter Berger’s term but my aim is to give real and critical answers to a long standing question of : How have they’ve done such act ? (Papaano magagawa ng isang tao ang isang bagay na karimarimarim tulad nito?)
2 The American school of sociology which holds a great deal of impact to the Philippine sociology would categorically call this as behavioral science but to logically argue human behavior can never be put in such rigid parameters, so the researcher believes that behavioral study is a much correct term to use borrowing from the European school of sociology.
1
NOTES3
A. RATIONAL FOR THE TOPIC
Crimino-forensic sociology is a distinctive subfield within the discipline of sociology which
analyzes the behavioral background of people who do crimes, why they do such acts and
how can they live knowing they’ve done such acts---- like heinous crimes.
Using a psychoanalytic-sociological perspective mostly used by such known theorist like
Erich Fromm, Karen Horney, Peter Berger and Charles Wright Mills. This kind of undertaking
can be made available and attainable. I also incorporated a method well known in the FBI-
BSU (behavioral science unit) known in the forensic discipline as criminal profiling.
As all of you are aware the Ampatuan massacre is very heinous crime that even in our
wildest imagination we don’t expect that it can happen here in our country but this only proves
that really evil is not a cultural thing. Jumping with the notion of evil the researcher ask why
they done it and how can they live (and be jolly like Andal Ampatuan jr. shown laughing while
in detention) knowing they done it. This I think is a compelling case that the social conditions
of these men the Ampatuans4 dramatically weakened the moral inhibitions that would have
otherwise prevented them from doing the unthinkable. I would also reintroduce Herbert C.
Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton’ three distinctive social processes needed for the execution of
heinous crime like this one of the Ampatuan, Maguindanao massacre.
B.THEORITICAL FRAME WORK
Looking in a general sociology textbook one of the most essential topic for
whoever is interested or is taking up a sociology class in its behavioral study is the
chapter on the sociology of collective social behavior and for those interested with the
3 This only serves as my research notes the actual paper is different.
4 When I talk about the Ampatuans I am putting distinctive behavior between two groups the Ampatuan clan and their private army the CVO (civilian volunteer organization) so when I’m referring to the general Ampatuan people who’ve done the heinous crime I will used Ampatuans but if the need arises to point a particular behavior I will used the term CVO to designate their underlings, so here there are two distinctive yet correlational behavioral reason why they’ve done the sanctioned massacre.
2
different the sociology of deviant behavior5 is the topic for you. For such one of the key
factor for a critical analysis of society’s functioning, movement, change and development,
is understanding the inherent social behavior occurring within it. To properly situate an
event, a social phenomenon, research should be done guided by theories which serve as
our lenses on analyzing society’s behavior.
This paper focuses on Crimino-forensic sociology, guided by its theories that are
mostly a convergence of psychoanalysis and sociological theorizing. In particular the
researcher used theories from Erich Fromm (Escape from Freedom, Man for himself, and
Sane Society.) Karen Horney (Neurosis and Human Growth (1950)). And with the
writings of Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton on the social psychology of authority
and responsibility on explaining the collective behavior of the CVO’s, the Ampatuan’s
private army.
Erich Fromm and his theories.
Who is ERICH FROMM?
Erich Fromm (1900-1980) was both a practicing psychoanalyst and a committed social
theorist. He had the ability to look, as Mills (1959) would have put it, to both individual troubles
and public issues. He also brought to his work a strong religious understanding, a humanistic
ethic and a vision of possibility. He had the ability to write for a popular audience, to develop a
strong social critique, and to combine psychological insight with social theory (drawing on diverse
sources such as Freud and Marx).
Erich Fromm’ first book Escape from freedom analyzes how man who is given freedom through
his individuality try to escape it. Because according to him with freedom comes isolation,
alienation and bewilderment. There are three ways on escaping freedom: Authoritarianism,
destructiveness and automaton conformity. In my readings of the Ampatuan clan’s action they
tend to apply the second escape which is destructiveness. We see in the news that this
Ampatuan’s hold a strong political and economic power within the Maguindanao province yet
they’ve allegedly done this act to continue holding to that power which is in term an issue of
escape from freedom through DESTRUCTIVENESS6 which refers to an attempt to destroy those
5 Deviant behavior as a subfield of sociology analyzes and discusses events, phenomenon or behavior that is contrary to existing social phenomenon but it does not mean that such acts are violations of our criminal law. Further more there is what we call Crimino-forensic sociology which specializes on social behavior that are grave violation of our existing criminal laws.
6 Taken from: Synopsis on psychoanalytic theory-political psychophilosopher. Retrieved from www.psych .com
we perceive as having (and are aiming) for power. Because of our desire for power, we may feel
that this finite resource must be taken from those who possess it. There are many ways to
attempt this destruction, including the alignment with hate groups, religious extremism, or even
patriotism or in the case of the Ampatuan by doing sanctioned massacre. While our actions are
often antisocial, cruel, and misguided, we rationalize them by claiming a sense of duty. It is worth
noting that being a Muslim warlord in Maguindanao such acts are normalize due to the status
symbol you inherit when you are born in a warlord main clan. On Fromm’s second book entitled
Man for Himself he defined and coined a term social unconscious an act which we do which we
believe are done in our own accord but such acts done by following orders we are used to we no
longer notice them. As Fromm emphasizes that we soak up our society with our mother’s milk.
Further more Fromm believes that our social unconscious can be best understood by examining
our economic systems. In fact he defines and even names five personality types which he calls
orientation in economic terms. The Ampatuans fall under the HOARDING ORIENTATION7,
hoarding people expect to keep. They see the world as possessions and potential possessions.
Fromm, drawing on Marx, relates this type to the bourgeoisie. Hoarding is associated with the
cold form of withdrawing family and with destructiveness.
KAREN HORNEY’s theories on neurosis
Horney's theory is perhaps the best theory of neurosis we have. First, she offered a
different way of viewing neurosis. She saw it as much more continuous with normal life than
previous theorists. Specifically, she saw neurosis as an attempt to make life bearable, as a way of
"interpersonal control and coping." This is, of course, what we all strive to do on a day-to-day
basis, only most of us seem to be doing alright, while the neurotic seems to be sinking fast.
Using Horney view we could see that the social surroundings were the Ampatuans live
contribute a lot of things to what transpired.
Intrapsychic conflict
The two important intrapsychic conflicts are the
idealized self image
o In a healthy situation, individuals develop a healthy self-confidence and
security
o In an unhealthy environment the individual tries to develop a sense of self-
realization so as not to feel isolated and inferior
7 C.George Boeree, Erich Fromm, 1997/2006
4
o They desperately acquire a stable sense of identity that is exaggerated and
this idealized self-image can take on one of three forms
o
The neurotic search for glory
Need for perfection (should’s & should not’s)
o Tyranny of the should’s
Neurotic ambition
o Compulsive drive toward superiority
Drive toward a vindictive triumph
o Put others to shame…humiliating others
Neurotic claims
Sense of entitlement…idealized view of themselves
Neurotic pride
False pride based not on the true self but on a spurious
image of the idealized self.
Karen Horney’s theory gives us a good explanation on neurotic behavior that is rooted in
our social environment. She argue that heinous crime ( in her language neurotic) are product of
our social surrounding, the environment on which we are raised. In the case of the Ampatuans,
Maguindanao a place of which according to the world bank report is a highly conflict affected area
for here we can read that growing in a environment like this would produce a distinctive deviant
behavior.
HERBERT C. KELMAN AND V. LEE HAMILTON
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY.8
Kelman et’al on their research concerning the My Lai Massacre presented a theoretical
look on how people can perform such acts of inhumanity- heinous crime in its extent. They
pointed out that acts of indiscriminate, ruthless, and often systematic mass violence, carried out
by military or paramilitary personnel while engaged in officially sanctioned campaigns, the victim
of which are defenseless and unresisting civilians such acts are called sanctioned massacres.
Sanctioned massacres involve three distinctive psychosocial processes to explain mass violence.
8 THE MY LAI MASSACRE: A MILITARY CRIME OF OBEDIENCE, Kelman H. and Hamilton L. retrieved from Readings for Sociology 4th edition edited by Garth Massey. Pg.39-57
5
Through this processes we can explain why people tend towards murderous acts without any
thought of it. Thus Kelman et’ al identified these three psychosocial processes namely:
authorization, routinization and dehumanization. Through authorization, the situation becomes so
defined that the individual is absolved of the responsibility to make personal moral choices.
Through routinization, the action becomes so organized that there is no opportunity for raising
moral questions. Through dehumanization, the actors’ attitudes toward the target and toward
themselves become so structured that it neither necessary nor possible for them to view the
relationship in moral terms.
AUTHORIZATION
Sanctioned massacres by definition occur in the context of authority situation, a situation
on which, at least for many of the participants, the moral principles that generally govern human
relationships do not apply. Thus, when acts of violence are explicitly ordered, implicitly
encouraged/ tacitly approved, or at least permitted by legitimate authorities, people readiness to
commit or condone them is enhanced. Behaviorally, authorization obviates the necessity of
making judgment or choices. An important corollary of the basic structure of the authority
situation is that actors often do not see themselves as personally responsible for the
consequences of their actions. In this situation, behavior that was formerly illegitimate is
legitimized by the authorities’ acquiescence.
This explanation of behavior applies heavily on the behavior of the CVO’s their blind
obedience to those who hold political and economic power, those in vested authority, the
Ampatuans. They characteristically feel obligated to obey orders of these people the
Ampatuans whether or not these correspond with their personal preferences.
ROUTINIZATION
Authorization process creates a situation in which people become involved in an action
without considering its implication and without really making a decision. While on the other hand
routinization fulfills two distinctive functions. First it reduces the necessity of making decisions,
thus minimizing the occasions in which moral questions may arise. Second it makes it easier to
avoid the implication of the action since the actor focuses on the details of the job rather than its
meaning. Routinization operates both at the level of the individual job performance is broken
down into a series of discreet steps, most of them carried out automatic, regularized fashion.
6
In this process the CVO’s are routinized on killing people who holds different vendetta
rather than their own so such acts – heinous crime are only a part of their job as private
army’s of the powerful Ampatuan clan.
DEHUMANIZATION
Authorization process override standard moral considerations; routinization process
reduce the likehood that such considerations will arise. Still the inhibitions against murdering
one’s fellow human beings are generally so strong that the victims must also be stripped of their
human status if they are to be subject to systematic killing. Insofar as they are dehumanized, the
usual principles of morality no longer apply to them.
In this process a continued effort is done so that sanctioned massacre can be performed
a state of psychopathy is achieved so that a normal person can perform murder. Such
state of psychopathy can be called dehumanization.
C.METHODOLOGY
“The successful revolutionary is a statesman, the unsuccessful one a criminal.”
“The paradoxical - and tragic – situation of man is that his conscience is weakest when he needs it most”
-Erich Fromm
Studying heinous crimes in a Crimino-forensic sociology subfield need a convergence of
behavioral science methods, so far studying the “criminal minds”9. Have created a new and
9 I used the term “criminal minds” taken from the same series title which profile criminal offenders specially those who do the most horrific heinous crime.