-
Cm
. Ju BdUtr23-25, Bucharest, RO-70318, Romania
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:Received 27 May 2011Accepted 12 April
2012Available online 21 April 2012
Keywords:ParatethysCarpathian
foredeepbiostratigraphypaleoenvironment
Global and Planetary Change 103 (2013) 135148
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
Global and Plan
l se1. Introduction
The Miocene paleoenvironmental evolution of the Mediterraneanand
Paratethys regions is largely inuenced by the opening and clo-sure
of the marine connections that strongly regulated the water
ex-change between the two domains and with the Indian and
Atlanticoceans (e.g. Harzhauser and Kowalke, 2002; Popov et al.,
2006;Harzhauser et al., 2007; De Leeuw et al., 2010). This
progressively
Paratethys (Peryt, 2006) and the Messinian in the
Mediterranean(Hs et al., 1973).
The ParatethysMediterranean water connection during theMessinian
is still heavily debated and the location of such a marinegateway
has not been proven so far (Popov et al., 2006; Krijgsmanet al.,
2010). The present-day connection through the Bosphorus isbelieved
to have originated much later in the Pliocene (e.g. agatayet al.,
2006), but the presence of many fossils of Paratethyan
afnityresulted in restricted conditions, signicant wvelopment of
endemic faunas and changes ofthe deposition of massive evaporites
durin
Corresponding author. Department of Geology, FacuBucharest
University, Blcescu Bd. 1, 010041, Romania.
E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Stoica
0921-8181/$ see front matter 2012 Elsevier B.V.
Alldoi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.04.004formed a semi-isolated entity
during the Portaferrian and experienced connectivity to the Black
Seadomain during the Odessian and Bosphorian.
2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.MessinianostracodsDacian
Basina b s t r a c t
The thick and continuous Mio-Pliocene sedimentary successions of
the Focani Depression in the Dacian Basinof Romania provide an
excellent opportunity to study the paleoecological changes in the
Eastern Paratethysduring the time when the Mediterranean and Black
Sea experienced major sea level uctuations related tothe closure
and re-opening of the marine connection to the Atlantic Ocean
during the Messinian Salinity Crisis.These successions form the
basis of high-resolution magneto-biostratigraphic studies that
allow a detailedcorrelation to the standard Geological Time Scale.
Here, we analyze the paleoenvironmental evolution of theEast
Carpathian foredeep by integrating micro- and macropaleontological
data and sedimentological analyses.The ostracod andmollusc fossil
associations from the Rmnicu Srat river section indicate that the
late Maeotiandepositional environment was characterized by shallow
waters and littoral to uvio-deltaic sediments. TheMaeotianPontian
boundary (6.04 Ma) is marked by a marine ingression, comprising
benthic (agglutinatedand calcareous) and planktonic (Streptochilus
spp.) foraminifera and nanofossils. Following this marine
ingres-sion, the Lower Pontian (Odessian; 6.045.8 Ma) fauna shows
an increased bathymetry of the basin. Thepresence of ostracod
species with eye tubercles indicates depositional environments
within the photic zone(b100 m). The Middle Pontian (Portaferrian;
5.85.5 Ma) is marked by a widespread sea level loweringresulting in
dominant uvio-deltaic conditions. This ecostratigraphy demonstrates
that the main Messiniansea-level draw down (at 5.65.5 Ma) occurred
in mid-Portaferrian times. Paleoenvironmental indicatorsshow that
the water level in the Fosani Depression dropped less than 100 m
during Mediterranean desiccation.The Dacian Basin remained lled
with water, suggesting a positive hydrological balance for the
region. This iscompatible with the presence of a shallow barrier at
Dobrogea (the Galati passage), separating the DacianBasin from the
Black Sea Basin during the lateMiocene. The PortaferrianBosphorian
boundary (5.5 Ma) ismarkedby a second transgressive event, but this
time without marine foraminifera. We conclude that the Dacian
Basinc National Institute of Marine Geology and Geoecology,
GeoEcoMar, Dimitrie Onciul StreetPaleoenvironmental evolution of
the EastMioceneearly Pliocene (Dacian Basin; Ro
M. Stoica a,, I. Lazr a, W. Krijgsman b, I. Vasiliev b, Da
Department of Geology, Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, Bucharest
University, Blcescb Paleomagnetic Laboratory Fort Hoofddijk,
Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 17, 3584 CD
j ourna l homepage: www.eater level variations, de-salinities,
culminating ing the Badenian in the
lty of Geology and Geophysics,Tel.: +40 21 3143508.).
rights reserved.arpathian foredeep during the lateania)
ipa c, A. Floroiu a
. 1, 010041, Romaniaecht, The Netherlands
etary Change
v ie r .com/ locate /g lop lachain the latest Messinian
Mediterranean sequences (Esu, 2007) supportthe hypothesis that the
Paratethys Sea drained into the Mediterraneanafter its desiccation
phase, relling it progressively with brackishwater and resulting in
the establishment of Lago Mare facies all overthe Mediterranean
Basin (Cita et al., 1978; Cosentino et al., 2006;Orszag-Sperber,
2006). It has also been shown that the water level inthe Black Sea
dropped because of Mediterranean desiccation (Dinu etal., 2005;
Gillet et al., 2007; Krijgsman et al., 2010; Vasiliev et al.,
-
2011), indicating that a marine ParatethysMediterranean
connectionmust have been present at Messinian times.
In this paper we focus on the thick and continuous
sedimentarysuccessions of the Focani Depression, one of the main
late Miocenedepocenters in the Dacian Basin of Romania, to
investigate thepaleoenvironmental changes in the Eastern Paratethys
during theMessinian. We integrate paleoecological information from
ostracods,foraminifera andmolluscs with sedimentological analyses
and a recent-ly developed chronology (Krijgsman et al., 2010). This
allows making adetailed reconstruction of the paleogeographic and
paleoenvironmentalevolutions of the East Carpathian foredeep during
the late Miocene andearly Pliocene.
2. Geological background
2.1. The Dacian Basin of the Eastern Paratethys
The Paratethys domain (Laskarev, 1924) developed as the
northernbranch of the former Tethys Ocean and became progressively
separatedfrom the southern Mediterranean branch by ongoing tectonic
move-ments in the AfricanEurasian collision process (Fig. 1). The
initiationof Paratethys took place 35 millions of years ago, from
where it subse-quently evolved as a large intra- and
intercontinental marine domainthat extended from the Alps to the
Aral Sea (Bldi, 1980; Rusu, 1988;Schultz et al., 2005). Until the
Middle Miocene, Paratethys was in com-munication with the normal
marine environments of the Mediterra-nean Basin and Indian Ocean.
The different Paratethys basins, mainlythe AlpineCarpathian Basin,
the Black Sea Depression and the CaspianDepression, were
intercommunicating, with periodical phases of isola-tion. By the
end of the Middle Miocene (late BadenianSarmatian),
Paratethys communications with the Mediterranean and Indian
Oceanwere restricted and eventually closed (Rgl, 1998).
Subsequently, Para-tethys itself subdivided into several brackish
(Lake Pannon) and low sa-linity restricted marine basins (Eastern
Paratethys) during the lateMiocene, all of them developing their
own endemic fauna.
The Carpathian orogenwas tectonically uplifted to become a
barrierin Sarmatian times (~1112 Ma), separating the Pannonian and
Tran-sylvanian Basins of the Central Paratethys from the Dacian and
EuxinianBasins of the Eastern Paratethys (Sanders et al., 1999;
Cloetingh et al.,2004; Vasiliev et al., 2009). In the Central
Paratethys, this resulted in amajor environmental change from
marine (Sarmatian) to mainly freshwater environments (Pannonian),
recently magnetostratigraphicallydated to take place between 11.6
and 11.3 Ma (Vasiliev et al., 2010;Paulissen et al., 2011; Ter
Borgh et al., 2013-this volume; De Leeuw etal., 2013). The Dacian
Basin evolved as a separate paleogeographic enti-ty where marine
conditions prevailed much longer than in the CentralParatethys
(Saulea et al., 1969). This resulted in the confusingnomenclature
of a Sarmatian s.l. stage, commonly used in Eastern Para-tethys
time scales, which was recently solved by using
Volhynian,Bessarabian and Khersonain stages instead (Fig. 1c).
2.2. The Rmnicu Srat section in the East Carpathian foredeep
The Dacian Basin developed as a part of the Eastern
Paratethys,located in between the Southern Carpathians, Pre-Balkan
area andthe Dobrogean High (Matenco and Bertotti, 2000). The
eastern partof the Dacian Basin (called Focani Depression because
of its high subsi-dence character) comprises the thickest Neogene
sedimentary coverof the Dacian Basin, approaching ~13 km
(Tarapoanca et al., 2003).Excellent exposures are on the western
ank of the basin along the
ne
e
ing
136 M. Stoica et al. / Global and Planetary Change 103 (2013)
135148Miocen
Mediterranean
Paratethys
Fig. 1. Schematic paleogeographic maps of the a) late Eocene and
b) late Miocene indicata
b
Late Eoce
Tethys Ocean area in the East Carpathian foredeep. Time scale
for the Dacian Basin (after Vasiliev et al., 2c
Paratethys retreat (after Blakey, 2011). The star locates the
relative position of the study
004 and Krijgsman et al., 2010) and its relation with the
standard GTS.
-
almost continuously outcropping Putna and Rmnicu Srat river
sec-tions (Andreescu and Papaianopol, 1970; Andreescu, 1973,
1975;Andreescu and Ticleanu, 1976; Vasiliev et al., 2004). These
sections con-sist in the lower part (Upper BessarabianMaeotian) of
alternating shal-low sandstones and shales (Saulea et al., 1969),
tilted to near verticalpositions, and in the upper part (Pontian to
Romanian) of shales, silt-stones, sandstones and coals (Pana, 1966;
Grasu et al., 1999; Panaiotuet al., 2007), progressively less
tilted to about 2030E. An extensive net-work of seismic proles
shows the absence of large tectonic and erosionalstructures in the
basin indicating continuous subsidence and depositionfrom the Upper
Bessarabian to Romanian (Fig. 2b; Tarapoanca et al.,2003).
Paleomagnetic data furthermore showed that no signicant rota-tions
affected the region after the deposition of the Upper
Bessarabiansediments (Dupont-Nivet et al., 2005).
The 7.2 km thick Rmnicu Srat river section (Fig. 2c) is
excellent-ly exposed and its Maeotian, Pontian and Dacian deposits
compriseabundant micro andmacrofossils. The changes in
characteristic faunalassemblages allowed the subdivision and
correlation to regional EasternParatethys Stages (Maeotian,
Pontian, Dacian) and Pontian substages(Odessian, Portaferrian,
Bosphorian) according to historic biostrati-graphic denitions (e.g.
Stevanovic et al., 1989).
2.3. Biochronology
In the framework of the Dutch research school of Integrated
SolidEarth Sciences (ISES), magnetostratigraphic time scales have
been
constructed for the sedimentary sequences of the East and
SouthCarpathian foredeep (Vasiliev et al., 2004; Vasiliev et al.,
2005). Thisresulted in high-resolution chronologies for the
Maeotian to Romanian(~8 to ~4 Ma) sediments of the Focani
Depression and the GeticDepression (southern Carpathians). The
reliability of the magnetic sig-nal has been conrmed by detailed
rock magnetic studies, that showedthe presence of two distinctly
different types of greigite, a primarymagnetosomal greigite and an
early diagenetic (b10 kyr) authigenicgreigite, both providing
stable and reliable paleomagnetic directions(Vasiliev et al., 2007;
Vasiliev et al., 2008). One problem with thesestudies was that they
were lacking direct biostratigraphic control andthat boundary
locations from geological maps had to be used to calcu-late the
ages for the Paratethys Stage boundaries.
The Eastern Paratethys stages and substages are all represented
inthe East Carpathian foredeep and can very well be identied
bymeans of their individual ostracod assemblages (Fig. 3, Plates 1,
2).This method allowed determination and magnetostratigraphic
datingof the regional stage boundaries in the Rmnicu Srat
section(Krijgsman et al., 2010). The MaeotianPontian transition is
locatedclose to the top of chron C3An.1n and is thus very
accurately datedat 6.040.01 Ma. The OdessianPortaferrian and
PortaferrianBosphorian transitions are both located within chron
C3r. Their ageshave been determined by assuming constant
sedimentation ratesand interpolation of the paleomagnetic age
constraints from the re-versal boundaries C3An.1n(y) and C3n.4n(o).
This resulted in ages of5.80.1 Ma for the OdessianPortaferrian and
5.50.1 Ma for
) sei
137M. Stoica et al. / Global and Planetary Change 103 (2013)
135148Fig. 2. a) Location of the study area in the Romanian
Carpathians, indicated with a star; b
successions from Sarmatian (= Khersonian) to Pleistocene; c)
detailed geological map of tsmic section modied after Tarapoanca et
al. (2003) indicating continuous sedimentary
he Rmnicu Srat river section (modied after Andreescu and
Ticleanu, 1976).
-
138 M. Stoica et al. / Global and Planetary Change 103 (2013)
135148the PortaferrianBosphorian boundary, respectively. The
PontianDacian boundary, and thus also the BosphorianGetian
substageboundary, is located within the reversed chron C3n.2r at an
age of4.700.05 Ma, in excellent agreement with earlier results
fromthe south Carpathian foredeep (Vasiliev et al., 2005; Krijgsman
etal., 2010).
3. Paleoenvironmental evolution of the East Carpathian
foredeep
3.1. Methods
The Rmnicu Srat river section was investigated in detail for
mi-cropaleontological analyses primarily focusing on foraminifera
andostracods. In addition, sedimentological and stratonomic
investiga-tions have been performed on the MaeotianPontian
successions.The sedimentological data coverage is discontinuous, as
detailed study lo-cations have been chosen according to outcrop
conditions, but additionalobservations have been made on
smaller-sized outcrops located in
Fig. 3. Upper Miocene to Lower Pliocene ostracod assemblages and
the main paleoenviron(modied after Krijgsman et al., 2010).
Salinity and water level curves are schematic interp
Plate 1.Most relevant ostracod species (Superfamily Cypridoidea)
from the Upper Maeotianindividuals, external lateral views, LV =
left valve, RV = right valve, RM=micropaleontolo2) Candona
(Caspiocypris) pontica Soka, carapace, view from RV, RM 207, Lower
Pontian; 34) Candona (Typhlocyprella) ankae Krsti, RV, RM 215,
Middle Pontian; 5) Candona (Typhltocypria) ossoinaensis Krsti.
carapace, view from RV, RM 88, Upper Pontian; 7) Candona negsp.,
carapace, view from RV, RM 89, Upper Pontian; 9), 10) Candoniella
sp., 9) carapace, view(Zalnyi), carapace, view from RV, RM 207,
Lower Pontian; 12) Candona (Hastacandona) hytoniella acuminata
(Zalnyi), RV, RM 94, Upper Pontian; 14) Pontoniella striata
(MandelstamRV, RM 220, Upper Pontian; 16) Zonocypris membranae
Stancheva, fragmented LV, RM 215from LV; 18) carapace, view from
RV; all specimens from RM 207, Lower Pontian; 19), 20)all specimens
from RM 88, Upper Pontian; 21), 22) Cypria sp.; 21) carapace, view
from RV;niles), LV, RM 201, Upper Maeotian; 25) Ilyocypris sp.,
carapace, view from LV, RM 79, UpperRV; RM 88, Upper
Pontian.between the main exposures. Samples were processed by
standard mi-cropaleontological methods, sieved over sieves of 63 m
and hand-picked under a microscope. Macropaleontological analyses
on mol-lusks have been performed in less detail. Taxonomic
identicationsand ecological inferences were based on Stancheva
(1968, 1990);Soka (1972, 1990a, 1990b); Hanganu (1974); Hanganu
andPapaianopol (1977; 1982); Krsti and Stancheva (1989);
Olteanu(1989, 1995); Papaianopol (1989); Meisch (2000); Gliozzi et
al.(2005, 2008); Stoica et al. (2007); Harzhauser et al. (2008);
andCziczer et al. (2009).
3.2. The Upper Maeotian
The Upper Maeotian of the Rmnicu Srat river valley is well
ex-posed on the outcrops downstream of Jitia village (Fig. 2c). In
general,the Upper Maeotian is represented by alternations of
sandstone andsilt. Many sandy units display channel structures, and
wave ripples arefrequently observed on the upper part of the
sandstone beds. Internal
mental settings and events from the Rmnicu Srat valley section
of the Dacian Basinretations of the various paleoenvironmental
indicators.
and Pontian of the Rmnicu Srat valley section (all valves of
ostracods belong to adultgical samples no.); 1. Amplocypris ex. gr.
dorsobrevis Soka, LV, RM 215, Middle Pontian;) Candona
(Caspiocypris) alta (Zalnyi), carapace, view from RV, RM 88, Upper
Pontian;ocypris) sp., carapace, view from the RV, RM 207, Lower
Pontian; 6) Candona (Camp-lecta G.O. Sars, carapace, view from RV,
RM 87, Upper Pontian; 8) Fabaeoformiscandonafrom RV, 10) LV; all
from RM 207, Lower Pontian; 11) Candona (Hastacandona)
lotzyisterica Kristi & Stancheva, carapace, view from RV, RM
207, Lower Pontian; 13) Pon-), RV, RM 220, Upper Pontian; 15)
Pontoniella quadrata (Krsti), carapace, view from
, Middle Pontian; 17), 18) Candona (Zalanyiella) venusta
(Zalnyi); 17) carapace, viewCypria tocorjescui Hanganu; 19)
carapace, view from LV; 20) carapace, view from RV;22) carapace,
view from LV; RM 207, Lower Pontian; 23), 24) Pseudocandona sp.
(juve-Pontian; and 26), 27) Bakunella dorsoarcuata (Zalnyi); 26)
LV; 27) carapace, view from
-
139M. Stoica et al. / Global and Planetary Change 103 (2013)
135148
-
140 M. Stoica et al. / Global and Planetary Change 103 (2013)
135148
-
c1 cmtigra
phic
leve
l (m)
of U
pper
Mae
otia
n os
its
Subs
tage
Age
(Ma)
Pola
rity
Synt
hetic
lo
g
141M. Stoica et al. / Global and Planetary Change 103 (2013)
1351481 m
Stra
Log
depsedimentary structures consist of small scale
cross-lamination, whichare occasionally disturbed, probably due to
the elimination of waterduring sediment compaction. The most
valuable paleoenvironmentalsignal comes from the presence of wave
rippled sediments, pointingto deposition in shallow water, probably
on the lower shoreface.Based on these structures the thick bedded
sandy layers are interpretedas shallow water deposits that probably
accumulated in the proximityof the river mouth under strong uvial
control.
The ostracods are highly abundant but very poor in species
number(Figs. 3, 4, Plate 1). The ostracod assemblages consist of
several speciesof Cyprideis (Cyprideis pannonica and C. ex. gr.
torosa) and some rarecandonids like Pseudocandona sp. (juveniles)
and Candoniella sp. Spo-radically, Leptocythere blanda is
present.
1 mm
Sandstone
Clay
Wav
Biossam
Legend:
Fig. 4. Stratigraphy, lithology and paleontology of the Upper
Maeotian of the Rmnicu Sratassemblage dominated by Cyprideis sp.;
c) accumulation of microgastropods (Hydrobia spp.)ex. gr.
subrecurvus (Sinzow).
Plate 2.Most relevant ostracod species (Superfamily Cytheroidea)
from the Upper Maeotianbelong to adult individuals, external
lateral views, LV = left valve, RV = right valve, RM=mRV, RM 116,
Upper Maeotian; 2), 3) Cyprideis ex. gr. torosa Sars; 2) smooth
specimen, carapPontian; 4), 5) Cyprideis sp. 1; 4) LV; 5) RV; RM
54, Lower Dacian; 6), 7) Cyprideis sp. 2; 6) LLV, male; RM 5, Lower
Dacian; 10) Cytherissa sp., LV, RM 79, Upper Pontian; 11)
Pontoleberismotasi Olteanu; 12) LV, male; 13) carapace, view from
RV, female; RM 220, Upper Pontian; 194, Upper Pontian; 16)
Tyrrhenocythere lipescui (Hanganu), LV, RM 88, Upper Pontian;
17)ex. gr. bosqueti (Livental), LV, RM 88, Upper Pontian; 19), 20)
Amnicythere cymbula (Liventalgr. cymbula (Livental); 21) LV; 22)
RV; RM 207, Lower Pontian; 23), 24) Amnicythere costSchneider; 25)
LV; 26) RV; RM 207, Lower Pontian; 27) Leptocythere blanda, LV, RM
215, Up29), 30) Amnicythere andrusovi (Livental); 29) LV; 30) RV;
RM 94, Upper Pontian; 31), 32)Maeotocythere bacuana (Livental); 33)
LV; 34) RV; RM 220, Upper Pontian; 35), 36) MaeotoLivental, LV, RM
220, Upper Pontian; and 38) Loxoconcha babazananica Livental, RV,
RM 96a
1 cmThe dominance of freshbrackish water and littoral conditions
isalso shown by the presence of abundant microgastropods
likeHydrobiasp. and Teodoxus sp. and Unionidae bivalves Psilunio
(Psilunio) ex. gr.subrecurvus (Fig. 4).
The observed macro and micro faunas indicate low salinity(05)
environments, typical of littoral setting or within lakesof short
life time. In the upper part of the Maeotian, intercalationsof
oolitic sandstones with micro-gastropods are common (Fig.
4c,d).
3.3. The MaeotianPontian transition
An important transgressive event takes place at the
MaeotianPontian boundary, characterized by a sudden lithological
change to
d
b e
e ripples
tratigraphical ple
Microgastropods (Hydrobia spp., Theodoxus spp.)
Unionids
1 cm
valley section: a) wave ripples on the upper bedding plane of a
sand layer; b) ostracod; d) oolite sandstones with abundant
gastropods (Theodoxus spp.); e) Psilunio (Psilunio)
, Pontian and Lower Dacian of the Rmnicu Srat valley section
(all valves of ostracodsicropaleontological sample no.); 1)
Cyprideis pannonica (Mhes), carapace, view fromace, view from RV,
RM 114, Upper Maeotian; 3) nodded specimen, RV, RM 226, UpperV; 7)
RV; RM 65, Upper Pontian; 8), 9) Cytherissa bogatschovi Livental;
8) LV, female; 9)pontica (Stancheva), fragmented RV, RM 209, Lower
Pontian; 12), 13) Tyrrhenocythere4), 15) Tyrrhenocythere ex
gr.motasi Olteanu; 14) LV; 15) carapace, view from RV;
RMTyrrhenocythere pannonicum (Olteanu), LV, RM 209, Lower Pontian;
18) Maeotocythere); 19) LV; 20) carapace, view from RV; RM 220,
Upper Pontian; 21), 22) Amnicythere ex.ata Olteanu; 23) LV; 24) RV;
RM 220, Upper Pontian; 25), 26) Amnicythere ex gr. lataper
Maeotian; 28) Amnicythere ex. gr. polymorpha Olteanu, LV, RM 219,
Upper Pontian;Amnicythere palimpsesta (Livental); 31) LV; 32) RV;
RM 207, Lower Pontian; 33), 34)cythere incusa Olteanu; 35) LV; 36)
RV; RM 203, Lower Pontian; 37) Loxoconcha petasa, Upper Pontian.
(see on page 140)
-
dominantly silty clays. This event coincides with a short-time
replace-ment of the fresherwater fauna by a fauna of signicantly
higher salinity.These assemblages are dominated by the occurrence
of benthonic calcar-eous foraminifers (species of Ammonia and
Porosononion) and especiallyof agglutinated foraminifers (species
of Ammotium). The enigmaticplanktonic foraminifera genus
Streptochilus has also been observed inlarge numbers at the same
level (Fig. 5). The biserial planktonic forami-nifera were earlier
described from the Upper Maeotian deposits of theWestern Caucasus
as belonging to the genus Bolivina, and some Bolivinaspecies were
also reported from the Taman peninsula (Maissuradze,1988). Several
morphological species of Streptochilus (Foraminifera)were described
in the Miocene of the western Indian Ocean and theeastern Atlantic.
They had previously been assigned to the benthicgenus Bolivina, but
evidence on their apertural morphology, togetherwith accumulation
rate data and isotopic composition shows that theylived as
plankton, and should be assigned to the planktic genusStreptochilus
(Smart and Thomas, 2006, 2007). It was suggested thatStreptochilus
may have evolved polyphyletically, either from biserialplanktic or
benthic ancestors, possibly in response to the occurrenceof
relatively eutrophic environmental conditions caused by
intermittentupwelling, leading to high algal growth rates but low
transport efcien-cy of organic matter to the sea oor (Smart and
Thomas, 2007). Recentinvestigations of the Upper Badenian and
Sarmatian of the Transylva-nian Basin revealed particular, small
sized planktonic foraminiferal as-semblages that include also the
biserial foraminifera Streptochilusoccurring in relation to a
transgressive event close to the end ofBadenian and provide
evidence for a paleogeographic connection tothe Indo-Pacic area at
that time (Filipescu and Silye, 2008).
Starting with the Pontian, a large diversication of the ostracod
faunatook place, marked by a sudden increase of species of
Pontoniella andCandona: Pontoniella acuminata, Candona
(Hastacandona) lotzy,Candona (Hastacandona) hysterica, Candona
(Zalanyiella) venusta,Fabaeformiscandona sp., Candona
(Caspiocypris) alta, Candona(Caspiocypris) pontica (Fig. 3, Plate
1). Cyprideis species are still veryfrequent.
The transitional interval is further characterized by shell
accumu-lations with the bivalve Congeria (Andrusoviconca)
amygadaloidesnovorossica, a biostratigraphic marker for the
MaeotianPontianboundary. The association of C. (A) amiygdaloides
novorossica, micro-gastropods and unionids (Psilunio sp.)
macrofauna is abruptly rep-laced by an association of limnocardiids
(Fig. 5), marking the baseof the Pontian according to its original
denition.
The MaeotianPontian boundary as dened here, is thus markedby an
inux of marine water into the Paratethys, probably comingfrom the
Mediterranean or alternatively from the Indian ocean(Krijgsman et
al., 2010; Ruban, 2010). After this very rapid marinewater inux,
the environment became less saline, as testied by theabundance and
diversity of Candoninae in the Lower Pontian.
3.4. The Lower Pontian (Odessian)
As a consequence of the MaeotianPontian transgression, theLower
Pontian starts with ne pelitic successions, deposited in
deeperwaters (~100150 m). The littoral and uvial facies from the
latestMaeotian are replaced by more distal ones; gray marls and
clayswith frequent intercalations of ferruginous marls and silts
(Fig. 6).
Subs
tage
Age
Po
larit
y Sy
nthe
ticlo
g
ave
iostamp
r
valecc
142 M. Stoica et al. / Global and Planetary Change 103 (2013)
135148Stra
tigra
phic
leve
l (m)
Log
of U
pper
Mae
otia
n /
Low
er P
ontia
n in
terv
al
1 cm
1 mm
Sandstone
Clay
W
Bs
Legend:
Marls
Influ
x of
mar
ine
wat
e
Fig. 5. Stratigraphy, lithology and paleontology of the
MaeotianPontian transition interagglutinated and calcareous benthic
foraminifers; b), c) Ammotium sp.; d), e) Ammonia b
Congeria (Andrusoviconca) amygadaloides novorossica Sinzow rich
layers.a
b
c
d
e
f
gh i
j k l1 cm 1 cm
1mm 0.5mm
ripples
ratigraphical le
Pseudoprosodacna sp
Congeria (Andrusoviconca) amygadaloides novorossica
of the Rmnicu Srat valley section: a) micropaleontological
assemblage dominated byarii (Linn); f), g) Porosononion ex. gr.
subgranosus (Egger); h), i) Streptochilus sp.; j)l)
-
An important rejuvenation of the ostracod fauna is observed in
theLower Pontian, resulting in colonization by a large number of
species:C. (Caspiocypris) alta, C. (Caspiocypris) pontica, Candona
(Camptocypria)ossoinaensis, C. (Zalanyiella) venusta, C.
(Hastacandona) hysterica,C. (Hastacandona) lotzyi, P. acuminata,
Pontoniella quadrata, Pontoniellastriata, Fabaeformiscandona sp.,
Candona (Typhlocyprella) ankae, Cypriatocorjescui, Cypria sp.,
Bakunella dorsoarcuata, Cytherissa sp., C.
pannonica,Tyrrhenocythere pannonicum, Amnicythere cymbula,
Amnicythere ex.gr.,cymbula, Amnicythere costata, Amnicythere
andrusovi, L. blanda (Figs. 3,6; Plates 1,2). The presence of
ostracods with eye tubercles indicatesthe need of the photic zone
for their development, in agreement withthe presence of green
charophyta algae in the same samples. At thebase of the Lower
Pontian there is a level with pyrite lled ostracods(Fig. 6), which
is similarly observed in the Taman Peninsula of Russia(Krijgsman et
al., 2010), pointing to large-scale dissoxic conditionsthroughout
the Eastern Paratethys.
The Upper Maeotian mollusc fauna is replaced by
limnocardiidsbivalves: Paradacna abichi, Pseudoprosodacna
littoralis littoralis,Prosodacna sturi, Caladacna steindachneri,
Didacna subcarinata,Limnocardium (Tauricardium) subsquamulosum,
Monodacna (Pseu-docatilus) pseudocattillus and Congeria
zagrabiensis (Fig. 6).
These faunal assemblages indicate that immediately after
theshort marine inux, the salinity of the Dacian Basin waters
decreased
again because of the high inux of continental waters. The
LowerPontian paleoenvironmentwas generally fresh to brackishwith
salinitiesof 78 (Fig. 3).
3.5. The Middle Pontian (Portaferrian)
The Middle Pontian represents a regressive phase in the
DacianBasin. There are a large number of uvial sandstones (Fig. 7),
fossilsoils, coaly clays and even thin coal levels. Rare
occurrences of sand-stones with limnocardiids bivalves are found.
The sedimentary recordbecomes scarce in fossils, although ostracods
and molluscs typicalof shallow water environment (littoral, uvial
and even subaeriallyexposed) have been found.
The ostracod fauna is rather scarce if compared with the
LowerPontian one (Fig. 3). The Middle Pontian species are
represented by:Amplocypris ex. gr. dorsobrevis (a species with
robust shell capableof living in littoral environment where sands
are deposited in hydrody-namically active regimes), Candoniella
sp., Zonocypris membranae(species able to quickly colonize
temporary, short-living lakes),Cyprideis ex.gr. torosa (littoral
species), Tyrrhenocythere motasi (aspecieswith robust shell capable
of living in sandysilty environments).These species are known to
adapt rapidly in changing environmentsfrom the lakes located close
to rivers, to marshes and lagoons (Plate 2).
Stra
tigra
phic
le
vel
Log
of Lo
wer
Pont
ian
depo
sits
a
c
Subs
tage
Age
(Ma)
Pola
rity
Synt
heti c
lo
g
ostratple
eudop
geriaygad
b
rat vartseud
143M. Stoica et al. / Global and Planetary Change 103 (2013)
1351481 cm
1 mm
Sandstone
Clay
Bisam
Ps
Con am
Legend:
Marls
Fig. 6. Stratigraphy, lithology and paleontology of the Lower
Pontian of the Rmnicu Stions rich in Limnocardiidae shells; c)
micropaleontological assemblage from the basal pmarls rich in
Paradacna abichi (R. Hoernes); f) Limnocardiids sandstone (Didacna
sp., P
Pseudoprosodacna littoralis littoralis (Eichwald).d e
f
h
1 cm 1 cm
1 cm
1 cm
igraphical
rosodacna sp
(Andrusoviconca) aloides novorossica
Paradacna abichi
Congeria rhomboidea
Dreissena spp.
Didacna sp
g
alley section: a), b) dominant marly sediments with thin
ferruginous sandy intercala-of Pontian dominated by Candonidae
ostracods with carapaces lled with pyrite; d), e)ocatillus sp.,
Pseudoprosodacna sp.); and g), h) ferruginous sandy layer with
abundant
-
144 M. Stoica et al. / Global and Planetary Change 103 (2013)
135148Subs
tage
Age
(Ma)
Pola
rity
Synth
etic
lo
g
Stra
tigra
phic
le
vel
Log
of M
iddl
e Po
ntia
n de
posit
s The molluscan fauna is also rare and represented by fresh
waterlacustrine and uvial forms: unioniids Unio (Rumanunio)
rumanusand dreiseniids Dreissena polymorpha (Fig. 7). Frequently,
planorbidgastropods typical of continental environments (temporary
ponds andlakes) have been identied.
These sedimentological and faunistical changes were caused by
animportant base level drop from basinal environments to ood
plaindeposits. The changes in lithofacies were reected in changes
infauna that became taxonomically poorer and have visible effects
inthe marginal areas of the basin (Stoica et al., 2007). The faunal
assem-blages indicate fresh water environments (04) and a
relativelysmall drop (~100 m) of the water level (Fig. 3).
3.6. The Upper Pontian (Bosphorian)
The Upper Pontian deposits accumulated in a more distal
setting,where ner, pelitic sediments are alternated with sandy
units. Thesene deposits are represented by massive or stratied gray
marlsand clays, rich in fossils, alternating with thinner
sandstones andshell accumulations (Fig. 8). The Upper Pontian is
marked by a gradualupward increase in littoral anduvial deposits,
evolving into deltaic anduvial deposits toward the PontianDacian
boundary. This is caused bya transgressive episode that marks the
base of Upper Pontian.
A new faunal bloom occurs and some of the species common inthe
Lower Pontian become dominant again (Fig. 3). Next to the
1cm
Sandstone
Clay
Legend:
Marls
Fig. 7. Stratigraphy, lithology and paleontology of the Middle
Pontian of the Rmnicu Srattinental deposits; b)d) layers with
abundant Unionidae bivalves: b) Psilunio sp., c), d)
Unio(Brusina).c e
1cm
1cm
aLower Pontian species, some new species appear that will
continue toexist up to Dacian (Hanganu, 1974; Hanganu and
Papaianopol, 1982;Olteanu, 1989, 1995; Stoica et al., 2007). The
main ostracod speciesfrom the Upper Pontian of the Rmnicu Sarat
Valley are: A. ex. gr.dorsobrevis, C. (Caspiocypris) alta, C.
(Camptocypria) ossoinaensis,Candona (Camptocypria) balcanica, C.
(Zalanyiella) venusta, P.acuminata, P. quadrata, P. striata,
Candona neglecta, Candoniella sp.,Cypria tocorjescui, Cypria sp.,
B. dorsoarcuata, Cytherissa boghatschovi,C. ex.gr. pannonica,
Cyprideis ex. gr. torosa, Cyprideis sp.2, T. motasi, T.ex.
gr.motasi, Tyrrhenocythere lipescui, A. cymbula, A. ex. gr.
cymbula,A. costata, A. andrussovi, Amnicythere palimpsesta,
Amnicythereex. gr. lata, Maeotocythere ex. gr. bosqueti,
Maeotocythere bacuana,Maeotocythere incusa, Loxoconcha
babazananica, Loxoconcha petasa(Plate 2). Two species of the
Amplocypris genus are recorded in theUpper Miocene and Pliocene
deposits of the Dacian Basin (Hanganuand Papaianopol, 1977;Olteanu,
1995; Floroiu et al., 2011):A. dorsobrevisSoka and Amplocypris
odessaensis Ilnitzkaia. More additional morpho-metric studies
(Danielopol et al., 2011a) are needed to nd out whichis the real
taxonomic afliation of Amplocypris species in Paratethys.The
presence of Leptocytheridae in the Paratethys Neogene is
alsoquestioned. Many species formerly attributed to the genus
Leptocythereare now re-evaluated and assigned to other
leptocytherids generalike Amnicythere, Callistocythere,
Euxinocythere, Maeotocythere,Mediocytherideis (Stancheva, 1968;
Gliozzi et al., 2005; Boomer etal., 2010). There is still a lack of
consensus in the literature on the
b fd
1cm 1cm
Biostratigraphical sample
Terrestrial gastropods Coaly clay
Lignite Viviparus spp.
Pseudoprosodacna sp.
Dreissena spp.
Unionids
valley section: a) sandy channel deposits separated by ood
plain, lacustrine and con-(Rumanunio) rumanus Tournour; e) Cepaea
sp.; and f) Theodoxus (Calvertia) slavonicus
-
145M. Stoica et al. / Global and Planetary Change 103 (2013)
135148Subs
tage
Age
(Ma)
Pola
rity
Synt
hetic
lo
g
Stra
tigra
phic
le
vel
Log
of U
pper
Pont
ian
depo
sits generic assignment of leptocytherid species (Namiotko et
al., 2011) anddetailed comparative morphological studies must be
developed for thisgroup of ostracods (Danielopol et al.,
2011b).
The bivalves are represented by numerous species that are
mostlytypical for brackish waters (Papaianopol, 1989): D.
polymorpha,Prosodacana (Prosodacna) mrazeci, Prosodacana
(Prosodacna) savae,Prosodacana sturi, Pseudocatillus sp.,
Plagiodacna sp., C. steindachneri,Limnocardium nobile, Limnocardium
sp., D. subcarinata, Lunadacna lunae,Phyllocardium planum
giganteum, L. (Tauricardium) subsquamulosum,Limnocardium
(Tauricardium) sp. Unio (Rumanunio) rumanus, Congeriabotenica, and
Chartoconcha bayerni. (Fig. 8). Gastropods are also abun-dant and
among them are: Viviparus acatinoides, Viviparus neumayrineumayri,
Lithoglyphus sp., Bulimus (Tylopoma) speciosus,
Melanopsis(Melanopsis) decolata, Zagrabica reticulata,
Valenciennius annulatus, andValenciennius sp.
Paleoenvironmentally, the base of the Bosphorian corresponds toa
second transgressive event in the Dacian Basin, showing a
majorfaunal change in the ostracod assemblages and a lithological
changeto more basinal sequences. The PortaferrianBosphorian
transitionis marked by a second bloom of ostracod fauna that
indicate salinitiesof 78 during the Upper Pontian (Fig. 3).
c
f 1cm
1cm
1mm
Sandstone
Clay
Biostsamp
Legend:
Marls
Coal
Lign
Fig. 8. Stratigraphy, lithology and paleontology of the Upper
Pontian of the Rmnicu Sratbasinal ne grained sediments at the base
of Upper Pontian; b) wave ripples on the upper bec) ostracod
assemblage from the basal part of the Upper Pontian marked by the
abundancyUpper Pontian; d) Plagiodacna sp.; e), f) Pseudocatillus
sp.; g) Chartchoncha bayerni (R. Hoea b4. Discussion
4.1. Dacian Basin water level changes during the late
MioceneearlyPliocene
The presence of agglutinated and calcareous foraminifera of
ma-rine origin at the MaeotianPontian boundary interval suggests
thata major ooding event has taken place in the Dacian Basin by
marinewaters, probably by establishing a connection to the
Mediterraneanor Indian Ocean. An Odessian transgression has also
been recognizedin seismic proles from the western Dacian Basin
(Getic Depression)where the Lower Pontian corresponds to a
progradationalaggradationalunit developed during rising water
levels (Leever et al., 2010). A LowerPontian transgression has
further been documented in other Paratethysbasins and is
biostratigraphically marked by a migration of faunal ele-ments from
the Pannonian Basin (Hungary) into the Eastern Paratethysand by a
migration of typical Aegean species into the Black Sea
domain(Stevanovic et al., 1989; Popov et al., 2006). In addition, a
marine nano-fossil inux, comprising assemblages that are
correlative to SubzoneNN11b, has been reported from the
MaeotianPontian boundary inter-val in the Dacian Basin (Marunteanu
and Papaianopol, 1998). Fossil
d
g
e
h i
1cm 1cm
1cm 1cm
ratigraphical le
y clay
ite
Viviparus spp.
Pseudoprosodacna sp. Dreissena spp.
Valenciennius anulatus
Limnocardium (Tauricardium) sp..
Pseudocatillus sp. Plagiodacana sp.
valley section; a) the transition from littoral sandy deposits
of Middle Pontian to moredding plane of a sandy layer from the
Middle PontianUpper Pontian boundary interval;of Tyrrhenocythere
spp.; d)i) most abundant mollusc species from the basal part of
thernes); h) Limnocardium (Tauricardium) sp.; and i) Valenciennius
annulatus Rousseau.
-
expected to haveuctuated in relation toMessinian
paleoclimatologicalchanges.
146 M. Stoica et al. / Global and Planetary Change 103 (2013)
135148assemblages from the Taman Peninsula of Russia show similar
marineassociations at the MaeotianPontian boundary interval
indicatingthat this transgression extended at least into the
eastern part of theBlack Sea Basin (Krijgsman et al., 2010).
A major water-level drop in the Dacian Basin took place
duringPortaferrian times (between 5.8 and 5.5 Ma) and resulted in
the re-establishment of uvio-deltaic conditions in the Focani
Depression.Our paleontological data indicate that depositional
environmentswithin the photic zone (b100 m) abruptly change to
faunal assem-blages typical of shallow waters (~050 m) and
terrestrial environ-ments during the Portaferrian. This implies
that only a relativelysmall water level drop has taken place (~100
m) in the Dacian Basinduring the Portaferrian, although the exact
amplitude is still a matterof debate. In seismic proles of the
western part of the Dacian Basin,the Portaferrian shows mainly
progradational units, deposited duringperiods of low water levels
(Leever et al., 2010). The correspondingwater level drop is here
roughly estimated at a maximum of 200 m,based on the elevation
difference between the shelf edges aboveand below the sequence
boundary. The other regions of the DacianBasin that developed in
water depths of ~100 m in the early Pontianstarted to evolve in
deltaic, uvial, lacustrine and/or littoral environ-ments at the
beginning of the Middle Pontian. This indicates that thewater level
in the entire Dacian Basin dropped during the Porta-ferrian, which
would be compatible with the presence of a shallowbarrier at
Dobrogea, separating the Dacian Basin from the Black SeaBasin.
The Upper Pontian is marked by a second transgression in the
EastCarpathian foredeep. Interpolation assuming constant
sedimentationrates suggests that this Bosphorian transgression
started at an age of5.50.1 Ma. In thewestern Dacian Basin, seismic
proles show a trans-gressive system tract at the base of the
Bosphorian as well (Leever,2007). In the Topolog region of the
south Carpathian foredeep, the Bos-phorian is found transgressive
on Maeotian deposits while the upper-most Maeotian, Odessian and
Portaferrian are missing (Stoica et al.,2007; Floroiu et al.,
2011). Our detailed micropaleontological studiesshow that the base
of the Bosphorian consists of fresh to brackishwater ostracods,
indicating a continental origin for this transgression,probably
related to a regional climatic change toward a positive
hydro-logical balance for the Paratethys region (e.g. Krijgsman et
al., 2010).
A Pliocene marine ooding of the Dacian Basin was
previouslysuggested based on the Hinova section (western Dacian
Basin),which was interpreted to represent the bottom set of a
Gilbert fandelta produced by Mediterranean inow water (Clauzon et
al., 2005).We have resampled this Hinova section of Clauzon et al.
(2005); theirFig. 6 for biostratigraphic dating. Our
micropaleontological analysesshow that this section corresponds to
the Lower Pontian (6.05.8 Ma),and thus not to the Pliocene, because
it comprises the Odessian ostra-cods, C. (Caspiocypris) alta, C.
(Camptocypria) balcanica, P. acuminata,P. striata, C. tocorjescui,
B. dorsoarcuata, A. andrusovi, Amnicythere sp.,Mediocytherideis sp.
and abundant limnocardiid bivalves, especiallyP. abichi. In
addition, recent micropaleontological and stratigraphicstudies of
the assumed foreset beds (Clauzon et al., 2005) clearly indicatea
BadenianSarmatian age for these coarse clastic sediments that
aremost likely tectonically tiltedMiddleMiocene alluvial fan
conglomerates(Marinescu, 1978; Jipa et al., 2011).
4.2. ParatethysMediterranean connectivity during the late
Miocene andearly Pliocene
The Black Sea itself has experienced signicant water
levelchanges during the Portaferrian. The sedimentary succession
exposedat the Black Seamargin of Russia (TamanPeninsula) shows a
conspicuousenvironmental change in Portaferrian, by brackish marls
with Pontianfauna indicative of the lower photic zone (50100 m
deep) abruptlychanging to condensed coastal sequences of reddish
sands, attributed
there to the base of the Kimmerian (= Middle Portaferrian,Our
biostratigraphic results suggest that a marine connectionexisted at
the MaeotianPontian boundary at 6.05 Ma, evidenced bythe inux of
foraminifera in the Dacian Basin. This is further conrmedby earlier
observations of a short calcareous nanofossil inux at
theMaeotian/Pontian boundary interval (Marunteanu and
Papaianopol,1998). According to earlier paleogeographic
reconstructions, the mostlikely marine connection is to the
Mediterranean (Popov et al., 2006),but the available
biostratigraphic data also do not exclude a gatewayto the Indian
Ocean (Krijgsman et al., 2010). Our new biochronologyfor the Dacian
Basin furthermore shows that the successively youngernanofossil
inux at the PontianDacian boundary, previously suggestedto
correlate to the Zanclean ooding event of the
Mediterranean(Marunteanu and Papaianopol, 1998), is now dated at
4.7 Ma.
5. Conclusions
New biostratigraphic data from the thick and continuous
sedi-mentary successions of the Focani Depression are incorporated
intoa magnetostratigraphic time frame. The integration of
paleoecologicalinformation from ostracods, foraminifera and
molluscs with sedimen-tary structures enables detailed
reconstructions of the paleogeo-graphic and paleoenvironmental
evolutions of the East Carpathianforedeep during the Messinian.
The Upper Maeotian is marked by sedimentary structures that
indi-cate the coexistence of uvial and littoral environments. The
faunalrecord suggests low salinity (04) environments, typical
ofperennial-lake or littoral setting or of temporary lakes and
ponds.
An important transgression takes place at the
MaeotianPontianboundary, characterized by a short-time
paleoenvironmentalchange to signicantly higher salinities (2030).
The faunal assem-blages are dominated by the occurrence of benthic
(agglutinated andcalcareous) and planktonic foraminifera. It is the
rst time that thesehave been observed at the Maeotian/Pontian
interval in the DacianBasin, and they indicate an inux of marine
waters at 6.05 Ma.
The Lower Pontian starts with ne pelitic sediments, deposited
indeeper water, but still within the photic zone. The salinity
decreasedto 78 because of a positive water balance determined by
theKrijgsman et al., 2010). This indicates that the Black Sea
experienceda sea level drop of at least 50100 m as well.
Drilling in the Black Sea Basin (DSDP Leg 42B) had earlier
revealeda peculiar sedimentary layer at the Mio-Pliocene boundary,
interpretedas shallow, supratidal and intertidal sediments in the
otherwise deep-water sequence and as caused by a sudden drastic
(~1600m) loweringof the Black Seawater-level (Hs andGiovanoli,
1979). In addition, seis-mic proles of the Black Sea Basin show
evidence of deep canyon cut-ting (Dinu et al., 2005; Gillet et al.,
2007). This major down dropscenario of the Black Sea implies a
negative water budget for the Para-tethys. In contrast, the
hydrological balance of the Black Sea basin isalso considered as
positive to explain overspilling of Paratethys watersduring the
Mediterranean Lago Mare facies (Cita et al., 1978; Esu,2007;
Gliozzi and Grossi, 2008). In that scenario it is envisaged thatthe
water level of the Black Sea only dropped to the sill height of
thepaleo-Bosphorus. The magnitude and, in some cases, even the sign
ofthe Paratethys sea or lake level changes during the Messinian are
thusstill seriously debated and subject to ongoing controversy.
Paleogeographic data from the Aegean region indicate that
no(signicant) gateway existed between Mediterranean and
Paratethys(agatay et al., 2006) and that only ephemeral marine
incursions tookplace in the Eastern Paratethys during the
Mio-Pliocene period(Stevanovic et al., 1989; Marunteanu and
Papaianopol, 1998; Popov etal., 2006). Consequently, water level in
the Paratethys could behigher inux of continental waters.
-
Babinszki, E., Mller, P., 2009. Life in the sublittoral zone of
long-lived Lake Pannon:
147M. Stoica et al. / Global and Planetary Change 103 (2013)
135148paleontological analysis of the Upper Miocene Szk
Formation,Hungary. Internation-al Journal of Earth Sciences
(Geologische Rundschau) 98, 17411766.
Danielopol, D.L., Gross, M., Harzhauser, M., Minati, K., Piller,
W.E., 2011a. How and whyto achieve greater objectivity in taxonomy,
exemplied by a fossil ostracod(Amplocypris abscissa) from the
Miocene Lake Pannon. Joannea Geologie und Pala-eontologie 11,
273326.
Danielopol, D.L., Gross, M., Namiotko, T., Minati, K., Piller,
W.E., Harzhauser, M., 2011b.Comparative morphology of ostracod
Leptocytheridae a prospect for better un-derstanding the origin and
evolution of selected Amnicythere taxa in long-livedLake Pannon
(late Miocene). Joannea Geologie und Palaeontologie 11, 5052.
De Leeuw, A., Bukowski, K., Krijgsman, W., Kuiper, K.F., 2010.
Age of the Badenian sa-linity crisis: impact of Miocene climate
variability on the Circum-Mediterraneanregion. Geology 38,
715718.
De Leeuw, A., Filipescu, S., Matenco, L., Krijgsman, W., Kuiper,
K., Stoica, M., 2013. Pa-leomagnetic and chronostratigraphic
constraints on the evolution of the Middle The Middle Pontian shows
a base level drop with visible effects inthe marginal areas of the
basin. It is scarce in fossils, and mainly os-tracods and molluscs
typical of shallow and fresh water (04) la-custrine environments
have been found, species known to adaptrapidly to changing
environments from lakes located close to rivers.
The Upper Pontian deposits accumulated in a more distal
setting,with ner pelitic sediments, alternated with sandy units.
Theupper part is marked by an increase in littoral and uvial
deposits,evolving into deltaic and uvial deposits (salinity between
7 and8) toward the PontianDacian boundary as a consequence of
pro-gressive basin lling with sediments.
Acknowledgments
We thank especially Georghe Popescu for his help with
bio-stratigraphical analyses of the Rmnicu Srat data
(foraminifera). Weacknowledge the constructive comments of Oleg
Mandic and twoanonymous reviewers. This work was nancially
supported by theNetherlands Research Centre for Integrated Solid
Earth Sciences(ISES) and the Netherlands Geosciences Foundation
(ALW) withsupport from the Netherlands Organization for Scientic
Research(NWO). This research was also supported by CNCSIS
Romaniafunding (ID 960 and 1 Euroc).
References
Andreescu, I., 1973. Precizari asupra limitelor etajului
Meotian. Acad. RSR, Stud. Cercet.Geol. Geoz.Geogr., Ser. Geol.
18/2, 541558.
Andreescu, I., 1975. Limitele si subdiviziunile Pontianului.
Acad. RSR, Stud. Cercet. Geol.Geoz.Geogr., Ser. Geol. 20/2,
235245.
Andreescu, I., Papaianopol, I., 1970. Biostratigraa depozitelor
sarmatiene dintre vaileMilcov si Rmnicu Srat. Acad. RSR, Stud.
Cercet. Geol. Geoz.Geogr., Ser. Geol.15/2, 499512.
Andreescu, I. and Ticleanu, N., 1976. Geological map 1:50 000,
sheet 113b, Dumitreti.IGR, Bucharest.
Bldi, T., 1980. The early history of the Paratethys. Fldtani
Kzlny, Bulletin of theHungarian Geological Society 110, 456472.
Blakey, R., 2011. Paleogeographic Maps in Rectangular Format:
Eocene and Miocene.
,http://www2.nau.edu/rcb7/rect_globe.html2011.
Boomer, I., Guichard, F., Lericolais, G., 2010. Late Pleistocene
to Recent ostracod assem-blages from the western Black Sea. Journal
of Micropalaeontology 29, 119133.
agatay, M.N., Grr, N., Flecker, R., Sakin, M., Tnoglu, C.,
Ellam, R., Krijgsman, W.,Vincent, S., Dikbas, A., 2006.
ParatethyanMediterranean connectivity in the Seaof Marmara region
(NW Turkey) during the Messinian. Sedimentary Geology188189,
171187.
Cita, M.B., Wright, R.C., Ryan, W.B.F., Longinelli, A., 1978.
Messinian paleoenvironments.In: Hs, K.J. (Ed.), Initial Reports of
the Deep Sea Drilling Project, pp. 10031035.
Clauzon, G., Suc, J.P., Popescu, S.M., Marunteanu, M., Rubino,
J.L., Marinescu, F., Melinte, M.C.,2005. Inuence of Mediterranean
sea-level changes on the Dacic Basin (Eastern Para-tethys) during
the late Neogene: the Mediterranean Lago Mare facies
deciphered.Basin Research 17, 437462.
Cloetingh, S.A.P.L., Burov, E., Matenco, L., Toussaint, G.,
Bertotti, G., Andriessen, P.A.M.,Wortel, M.J.R., Spakman, W., 2004.
Thermo-mechanical controls on the mode ofcontinental collision in
the SE Carpathians (Romania). Earth and Planetary ScienceLetters
218, 5776.
Cosentino, D., Federici, I., Cipollari, P., Gliozzi, E., 2006.
Environments and tectonic in-stability in central Italy (Garigliano
Basin) during the late Messinian Lago-Mare epi-sode: new data from
the onshore Mondragone 1 well. Sedimentary Geology188189,
297317.
Cziczer, I., Magyar, I., Pipk, R., Bhme, M., Stjepan, C., Bakra,
K., St-Szentai Lantos, M.,Miocene Transylvanian Basin (Romania) and
implications for Central Paratethysstratigraphy and emplacement of
the Tisza-Dacia plate. Global and PlanetaryChange 103, 8298.
Dinu, C., Wong, H.K., Tambrea, D., Matenco, L., 2005.
Stratigraphic and structural charac-teristics of the Romanian Black
Sea shelf. Tectonophysics 410, 417435.
Dupont-Nivet, G., Vasiliev, I., Langereis, C.G., Krijgsman, W.,
Panaiotu, C., 2005. Neogenetectonic evolution of the southern and
eastern Carpathians constrained by paleo-magnetism. Earth and
Planetary Science Letters 236 (12), 374387.
Esu, D., 2007. Latest Messinian Lago-Mare Lymnocardiinae from
Italy: close relationswith the Pontian fauna from the Dacic Basin.
Geobios 40 (3), 291302.
Filipescu, S., Silye, L., 2008. New Paratethyan biozones of
planktonic foraminifera de-scribed from the Middle Miocene of the
Transylvanian Basin (Romania). GeologicaCarpathica 59 (6),
537544.
Floroiu, A., Stoica, M., Vasiliev, I., Krijgsman, W., 2011.
Maeotian/Pontian ostracods inthe Badislava Topolog area (south
Carpathian foredeep, Romania). Geo-Eco-Ma-rina 17, 177184.
Gillet, H., Lericolais, G., Rehault, J.-P., 2007. Messinian
event in the Black Sea: evidenceof a Messinian erosional surface.
Marine Geology 244, 142165.
Gliozzi, E., Grossi, F., 2008. Late Messinian Lago-Mare ostracod
palaeoecology: a correspon-dence analysis approach.
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 264(34),
288295.
Gliozzi, E., Rodriguez-Lazaro, J., Nachite, D., Martin-Rubio,
M., Bekkali, R., 2005. An over-view of Neogene brackish
leptocytherids from Italy and Spain: biochronologicaland
palaeogeographical implications. Palaeogeography,
Palaeoclimatology, Palaeo-ecology 225, 283301.
Grasu, C., Catana, C., Bobos, I., 1999. Molasa Carpatilor
Orientali, Petrograe sisedimentogeneza, Editura Tehnica, Bucuresti,
p. 227 (in Romanian).
Hanganu, E., 1974. Observation sur l'ostracofaune pontienne de
la rgion comprise a lavalle du Danube et la valle du Motru. Revista
Espaola de Micropaleontologia VI(3), 335346.
Hanganu, E., Papaianopol, I., 1977. Les subdivisions du Dacien
fondes sur les associa-tions de malacofaune et l'ostracofaune.
Bulletin de la Socit belge de Gologie85, 6388.
Hanganu, E.N., Papaianopol, I., 1982. Associations signicatives
du Pontien du BassinDacique (Roumanie). Bulletin de la Socit belge
de Gologie 91, 5159.
Harzhauser, M., Kowalke, T., 2002. Sarmatian (Late Middle
Miocene) gastropod assem-blages of the Central Paratethys. Facies
(46), 5782.
Harzhauser, M., Piller, W.E., Latal, C., 2007. Geodynamic impact
on the stable isotopesignatures in a shallow epicontinental sea.
Terra Nova 19 (5), 324330.
Harzhauser, M., Kern, A., Soliman, A., Minati, K., Piller, W.E.,
Danielopol, D.E., Zuschin, M.,2008. Centennial- to decadal scale
environmental shifts in and around Lake Pannon(Vienna Basin)
related to a major late Miocene lake level rise.
Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 270, 102115.
Hs, K.J., Giovanoli, F., 1979. Messinian event in the Black Sea.
Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 29, 7593.
Hs, K.J., Ryan, W.B.F., Cita, M.B., 1973. Late Miocene
desiccation of the Mediterranean.Nature 242, 240244.
Jipa, D., Stoica, M., Andreescu, I., Floroiu, A., Maximov, G.,
2011. Zanclean Gilbert-typefan deltas in the Turnu Severin area
(Dacian Basin, Romania). A critical analysis.Geo-Eco-Marina 17,
177187.
Krijgsman, W., Stoica, M., Vasiliev, I., Popov, V.V., 2010. Rise
and fall of the Paratethys Seaduring the Messinian salinity crisis.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 290, 183191.
Krsti, N., Stancheva, N., 1989. Ostracods of Eastern Serbia and
Northern Bulgaria withnotice on a Northern Turkey assemblage. In:
Malez, M., Stevanovic, P. (Eds.),Chronostratigraphie und
Neostratotypen, pp. 753819. Bd. VIII, Pontien Pl1, JAZUet SANU,
Zagreb-Beograd.
Laskarev, V., 1924. Sur le equivalents du Sarmatien superieur en
Serbie. Recueil detraveaux offert a M. Jovan Cvijic par ses amis et
collaborateurs, pp. 7385.
Leever, K.A., 2007. Foreland of the Romanian Carpathians:
Controls on late OrogenicSedimentary Basin Evolution and Paratethys
Paleogeography. VU University Am-sterdam, Amsterdam. 182 pp.
Leever, K., Matenco, L., Rabagia, T., Cloetingh, S.,
Krijgsman,W., Stoica, M., 2010. Messiniansea level fall in the
Dacic Basin (Eastern Paratethys): palaeogeographical
implicationsfrom seismic sequence stratigraphy. Terra Nova 22,
1217, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.2009.00910.x.
Maissuradze, L.S., 1988. Foraminifery meotisa zapadnoi Gruzii.
Metzniereba. (73 pp., 32pls. Tbilisi. in Russian).
Marunteanu, M., Papaianopol, I., 1998. Mediterranean
nannoplankton in the Dacicbasin. Rom. J. Stratigraphy 78,
115121.
Marinescu, F., 1978. Stratigraa Neogenului Superior din Sectorul
Vestic al BazinuluiDacic. Edit. Acad. R.S.R.Marunteanu, M. and
Papaianopol, I., 1998. Mediterraneannannoplankton in the Dacic
basin. Romanian Journal of Stratigraphy 78, 115121.
Matenco, L., Bertotti, G., 2000. Tertiary tectonic evolution of
the external East Car-pathians (Romania). Tectonophysics 316,
255286.
Meisch, C., 2000. Freshwater Ostracoda of Western and Central
Europe. SpectrumAcademicher Verlag, Heidelberg-Berlin, p. 522.
Namiotko, T., Danielopol, D.L., Belmecheri, S., Gross, M., von
Grafenstein, U., 2011. OnLeptocytheridae ostracods of long-lived
Lake Ohrid (Albania/Macedonia). JoanneaGeologie und Palaeontologie
11, 151153.
Olteanu, R., 1989. La faune d'ostracodes pontiens du Bassin
Dacique. Chronostratigraphieund Neostratotypen Pliozn Neogen der
Zentrale Paratethys, Bd. VIII Pontien, Jugosl.Akad. Wissen und
Knste, pp. 722726.
Olteanu, R., 1995. Dacian ostracods. In: Marinescu, F.,
Papaianopol, I. (Eds.), Pliozn Pl1Dazien. Chronostratigraphie und
Neostratotypen. Neogen der Zentrale Paratethys.Editura Academeiei
Romane, Bucharest, p. 530.
Orszag-Sperber, F., 2006. Changing perspectives in the concept
of Lago-Mare in Medi-terranean late Miocene evolution. Sedimentary
Geology 188189, 259277.
-
Pana, I., 1966. Studiul depozitelor Pliocene din regiunea
cuprinsa intre valea Buzaului sivalea Balaneasa. Studii tehnice si
economice, Seria J-Stratigrae, nr.1: Bucharest.
Panaiotu, C.E., Vasiliev, I., Panaiotu, C.G., Krijgsman, W.,
Langereis, C.G., 2007. Provenanceanalysis as a key to orogenic
exhumation: a case study from the East Carpathians(Romania). Terra
Nova 19, 120126.
Papaianopol, I., 1989. Considration sur le mollusques pontiens
de Roumanie.Chronostratigraphie und Neostratotypen Pliozn Neogen
der Zentrale Paratethys,Bd. VIII Pontien, Jugosl. Akad. Wissen und
Knste, pp. 582591.
Paulissen, W., Luthi, S.M., Grunert, P., ori, S. And,
Harzhauser, M., 2011. Integratedhigh-resolution stratigraphy of a
Middle to late Miocene sedimentary sequencein the central part of
the Vienna Basin. Geol. Carp. 62, 155169.
Peryt, T.M., 2006. The beginning, development and termination of
the Middle Badeniansalinity crisis in Central Paratethys.
Sedimentary Geology 188189, 379396.
Popov, S.V., Shcherba, I.G., Ilyina, L.B., Nevesskaya, L.A.,
Paramonova, N.P., Khondkarian, S.O.,Magyar, I., 2006. Late Miocene
to Pliocene papaeogeography of the Paratethys and itsrelation to
the Mediterranean. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
Palaeoecology238, 91106.
Rgl, F., 1998. Palaeogeographic considerations for Mediterranean
and Paratethys sea-ways (Oligocene to Miocene). Annalen des
Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien99, 279310.
Ruban, D.A., 2010. Stratigraphic evidence of a late Maeotian
(late Miocene) punctuatedtransgression in the Tanais Palaeobay
(northern part of the Eastern Paratethys,South-West Russia).
Geologos 16 (3), 169181.
Rusu, A., 1988. Oligocene events in Transylvania (Romania) and
the rst separation ofParatethys, D.S. Institute of Geological Geoz
7273, 207223.
Sanders, C.A.E., Andriessen, P.A.M., Cloetingh, S.A.P.L., 1999.
Life cycle of the EastCarpathian orogen: erosion history of a
doubly vergent critical wedge assessedby ssion track
thermochronology. Journal of Geophysical Research B: SolidEarth 104
(B12), 2909529112.
Saulea, E., Popescu, I., Sandulescu, M., 1969. Lithofacies
Atlas, VI Neogene, Sheets 48and 1013. Institutul de Geologie si
Geozica.
Schultz, H.-M., Bechtel, A., Sachsenhofer, R.F., 2005. The birth
of the Paratethys duringthe Oligocene: from Tethys to an ancient
Black Sea analogue. Global and PlanetaryChange 49, 163176.
Smart, C.W., Thomas, E., 2006. The enigma of early Miocene
biserial planktic foraminif-era. Geology 34, 10411044.
und Neostratotypen: Neogen der Westlichen (Zentrale) Paratethys
8. Pontien(1989) Jazu and Sanu, ZagrebBeograd, pp. 672721.
Stancheva, M., 1968. New data on the subfamily Leptocytherinae
Hanai, 1957. BulgarianAcademy of Sciences, Soa Bulletin of the
Geological Institute 17, 3748.
Stancheva, M., 1990. Upper Miocene ostracods from northern
Bulgaria. GeologicaBalcanica 5, 1116.
Stevanovic, P., Nevesskaya, L.A., Marinescu, F., Sokac, A.,
Jmbor, A., 1989.Chronostratigraphie und Neostratotypen: Pliozn Pl1,
Pontien. JAZU & SANU,ZagrebBeograd. 952 pp.
Stoica, M., Lazar, I., Vasiliev, I., Krijgsman, W., 2007.
Mollusc assemblages of the Pontianand Dacian deposits from the
Topolog Arges area (southern Carpathian foredeep Romania). Geobios
40, 391405.
Tarapoanca, M., Bertotti, G., Matenco, L., Dinu, C., Cloetingh,
S.A.P.L., 2003. Architectureof the Fosani Depression: a 13 km deep
basin in the Carpathians bend zone(Romania). Tectonics 22 (6),
1074, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002TC001486.
Ter Borgh, M., Vasiliev, I., Stoica, M., Kneevi, S., Matenco,
L., Krijgsman, W., Rundi, L.,Cloetingh, S., 2013. The isolation of
the Pannonian basin (Central Paratethys): newconstraints from
magnetostratigraphy and biostratigraphy. Global and PlanetaryChange
103, 99118.
Vasiliev, I., Krijgsman, W., Langereis, C.G., Panaiotu, C.E.,
Matenco, L., Bertotti, G., 2004.Towards an astrochronological
framework for the eastern Paratethys Mio-Pliocenesedimentary
sequences of the Focsani basin (Romania). Earth and Planetary
ScienceLetters 227, 231247.
Vasiliev, I., Krijgsman, W., Stoica, M., Langereis, C.G., 2005.
Mio-Pliocenemagnetostratigraphy in the southern Carpathian foredeep
and MediterraneanParatethys correlations. Terra Nova 17,
376384.
Vasiliev, I., Dekkers, M.J., Krijgsman, W., Franke, C.,
Langereis, C.G., Mullender, T.A.T.,2007. Early diagenetic greigite
as a recorder of the palaeomagnetic signal in MiocenePliocene
sedimentary rocks of the Carpathian foredeep (Romania). Geophysical
JournalInternational 171, 613629.
Vasiliev, I., Franke, C., Meeldijk, J.D., Dekkers, M.J.,
Langereis, C.G., Krijgsman, W., 2008.Putative greigite
magnetofossils from the Pliocene epoch. Nature Geoscience 1,782786
710.1038/ngeo1335.
Vasiliev, I., Matenco, L., Krijgsman, W., 2009. The syn- and
post-collisional evolution ofthe Romanian Carpathian foredeep: new
constraits from anisotropy of magneticsusceptibility and
paleostress analyses. Tectonophysics 473, 457465,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.04.002.
148 M. Stoica et al. / Global and Planetary Change 103 (2013)
135148tic and Indian Oceans. Micropaleontology 53 (12), 73103.Soka,
A., 1972. Pannonian and Pontian ostracode fauna of Mt. Medvednica.
Palaeontol.
Jugosl., Zagreb 2, 1140.Soka, A., 1990a. The Pontian in Croatia.
In: Stevanovi, P., Nevesskaja, L.A., Marinescu,
Fl., Soka, A., Jmbor, . (Eds.), Chronostratigraphie und
Neostratotypen: Neogender Westlichen (Zentrale) Paratethys 8.
Pontien (1989), Jazu and Sanu, ZagrebBeograd, pp. 180194.
Soka, A., 1990b. Pontian ostracod fauna in the Pannonian Basin.
In: Stevanovi, P.,Nevesskaja, L.A., Marinescu, Fl, Soka, A., Jmbor,
. (Eds.), ChronostratigraphieVasiliev, I., de Leeuw, A., Filipescu,
S., Krijgsman, W., Kuiper, K., Stoica, M., Briceag, A.,2010. The
age of the SarmatianPannonian transition in the Transylvanian
Basin(Central Paratethys). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
Palaeoecology 297,5469,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.07.015.
Vasiliev, I., Iosidi, A.G., Khramov, A.N., Krijgsman, W.,
Kuiper, K.F., Langereis, C.G.,Popov, V.V., Stoica, M., Tomsha,
V.A., Yudin, S.V., 2011. Magnetostratigraphy andradio-isotopic
dating of Upper MioceneLower Pliocene sedimentary successions ofthe
Black Sea Basin (Taman Peninsula, Russia). Palaeogeography,
Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology 310, 163175,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.06.022.Smart, C.W., Thomas,
E., 2007. Emendation of the genus Streptochilus Brnnimann andResig,
1971 (Foraminifera), and new species from the Lower Miocene of the
Atlan-
Paleoenvironmental evolution of the East Carpathian foredeep
during the late Mioceneearly Pliocene (Dacian Basin; Romania)1.
Introduction2. Geological background2.1. The Dacian Basin of the
Eastern Paratethys2.2. The Rmnicu Srat section in the East
Carpathian foredeep2.3. Biochronology
3. Paleoenvironmental evolution of the East Carpathian
foredeep3.1. Methods3.2. The Upper Maeotian3.3. The MaeotianPontian
transition3.4. The Lower Pontian (Odessian)3.5. The Middle Pontian
(Portaferrian)3.6. The Upper Pontian (Bosphorian)
4. Discussion4.1. Dacian Basin water level changes during the
late Mioceneearly Pliocene4.2. ParatethysMediterranean connectivity
during the late Miocene and early Pliocene
5. ConclusionsAcknowledgmentsReferences