Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM. Packets of Energy and the notion of String Theories . Introduction: pi-Profiling the Word Seeds of Notion for: Quote: Stanford University youtube physics lectures Published on Mar 30, 2011. 1 through 10: String Theory and M- Theory by: Leonard Susskind End-quote. when our pi-Profiling Formula Facilitator f is [ 16/pi ] denoted f1 . . Author: Kevin John Trinder, independent researcher . Please note i am dyslexic and use of the periods is to keep me focused . Began this paper on June 1st 2017. updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM. . Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is August 23rd 2017. updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM . pi-Profiling Particle Physics: Argument side of equation versus Sum side of equation ( 4 ) . regarding the observation of f%T = 21.4601836602552% . i first observed 0.214601836602552 as a Geometric ratio . and this ratio of 0.214601836602552 will be observed in many . approaches to/for understand Particle Physics and Science in general . . so, Mass ( M ) denotes Packets of Energy ( M ) . our M^2 formula is as follows: Perhaps . when our Mass ( a packet of energy ) is progressively increased in one environment to a point of . maximum energy-efficiency . perhaps our experiment compensates in two other energy environments . within or about our experiment . . we observe from our pi-Profiling that . M^2 = { [ ( M / 2 )^2 ] * pi } + [ { [ ( M / 2 )^2 ] * pi } * 27.3239544735163% ] . . because our endeavours to understand Particle Physics are conducted in general . with both physical-circular and theoretical-circular Number Theory Concepts . we are now pleasantly surprised and reassured to find that our diameter 1PD^2 . and the area of our pi-Profiling Perimeter for our diameter 1PD . are connected by: . f%H = 27.3239544735163% Page of 1 37
37
Embed
Packets of Energy and the notion of String Theories ... · Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM. Packets of Energy and
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
Packets of Energy and the notion of String Theories .
Introduction: pi-Profiling the Word Seeds of Notion for:
Quote: Stanford University youtube physics lectures Published on Mar 30, 2011.
1 through 10: String Theory and M- Theory by: Leonard Susskind End-quote.
when our pi-Profiling Formula Facilitator f is [ 16/pi ] denoted f1 . .
Author: Kevin John Trinder, independent researcher .
Please note i am dyslexic and use of the periods is to keep me focused .
Began this paper on June 1st 2017. updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM. .
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is August 23rd 2017. updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM .
pi-Profiling Particle Physics: Argument side of equation versus Sum side of equation ( 4 ) .
regarding the observation of f%T = 21.4601836602552% .
i first observed 0.214601836602552 as a Geometric ratio .
and this ratio of 0.214601836602552 will be observed in many .
approaches to/for understand Particle Physics and Science in general . .
so, Mass ( M ) denotes Packets of Energy ( M ) .
our M^2 formula is as follows: Perhaps
. when our Mass ( a packet of energy ) is progressively increased in one environment to a point of
. maximum energy-efficiency
. perhaps our experiment compensates in two other energy environments
. within or about our experiment
.
. we observe from our pi-Profiling that
.
M^2 = { [ ( M / 2 )^2 ] * pi } + [ { [ ( M / 2 )^2 ] * pi } * 27.3239544735163% ]
.
. because our endeavours to understand Particle Physics are conducted in general
.
with both physical-circular and theoretical-circular Number Theory Concepts .
we are now pleasantly surprised and reassured to find that our diameter 1PD^2 .
and the area of our pi-Profiling Perimeter for our diameter 1PD .
are connected by: .
f%H = 27.3239544735163%
Page ! of !1 37
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
.
f%T = 21.4601836602552% .
and .
f%H = 27.3239544735163% may be expressed as [ (4/pi) -1 ] * 100 . .
n.b. in closing i suspect that the Mass ( M ) of Higgs boson .
may be considered as a Notional approximate pi extraction value of
4pi/10
Notional Mass ( M ) of Higgs boson =~ 1.25663706143592 GeV/c^2 . .
at this time August 26th 2017. .
i am pi-Profiling my suspected Notional approximate pi extraction value of
Notional Mass ( M ) of Higgs boson =~ 1.25663706143592 GeV/c^2
.
.
my Notional value for The Speed of Light ( Cn ) is .
Cn = 299,655,737.57661187296417378414916.
.
.
this paper
Packets of Energy and the notion of String Theories .
Introduction: pi-Profiling the Word Seeds of Notion for:
Quote: Stanford University youtube physics lectures Published on Mar 30, 2011.
1 through 10: String Theory and M- Theory by: Leonard Susskind End-quote.
when our pi-Profiling Formula Facilitator f is [ 16/pi ] denoted f1 .
will continue on as: .
Notional pi-Profiling Formula for: Mass ^2
.
.
pi-Profiling: The Mass ( M ) of the Higgs boson
.
.
electron 0.50995602, 1 eV 1.60207411, the Higgs boson 1.25826606
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is August 14th 2017. 12:09 AM.
Re: Pages 137, 138, 140, 141 ( ISBN 978-3-95450-172-4 )
Proceedings of HF2014, Beijing, China
Beam-Beam Limit, Number of IP’S And Energy Kazuhito Ohmi, KEK, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
The 55th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop on High Luminosity Circular e+e- Colliders – Higgs Factory ( HF2014 )
http://epaper.kek.jp/HF2014/papers/proceed.pdf
Interaction region and machine-detector interface
Quote:
Figure 2 shows ξy per IP and vertical beam size evolution as function of the equilibrium bunch pop-ulation. The vertical beam size evolutions are for (νx , νy )=(0.5775,0.0425)/IP. There are no remarkable sig-nal related to luminosity degradation in x,σ . The x beam-beam tune shift per IP is saturated at 0.12 for (νx , νy )=(0.5775,0.0425)/IP, while is not saturated over 0.18 at (0.51,0.57). The fractional tune operating point (0.5775,0.0425) is given by the tune in Table 1 divided by 4. LEP had been operated at the tune area (0.57,0.04) in every energy. CESR, KEKB, PEPII, BEPC-II had operated at the tune area (νx , νy )=(0.51,0.58). The electron positron colliders were successful by adopting the tune operating point. At (νx , νy )=(0.5775,0.0425)/IP, beam-beam limit is seen ∼ 0.12 at Ne = 3 × 1011. This value is very higher than experimental value 0.044 at Ne = 1.2 × 1011 in Table 1. Figure 3 shows evolutions of ⟨y⟩ and ⟨yz⟩ at Ne = 3 × 1011. Coherent oscillation of π mode is seen in ⟨y⟩ motion (1st and 2nd pictures). ⟨yz⟩ (3rd) of two beams, which is related to head-tail motion, oscillate with an op- posite phase.
End-quote . .
My Notional pi-Profiling constant outcomes for Science in general are:
0.0424927254249574 inverse value 23.5334399005781
0.57768182124058 inverse value 1.7310567222844 . .
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is August 13th 2017. 12:14 Hrs.
re: Page 111 Robust Signal Extraction Methods and Monte Carlo Sensitivity Studies for
the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory and SNO+ Experiments
Quote: 5.6.1 Neutron Rate to Flux Conversion:
The SNO heavy water target is taken to be a sphere of radius 600.54 cm with
an average deuteron density (after correcting for the NCD displacement) of 6.6352x1028 m−3. End-quote
Quote: G.4 Electromagnetism and The Weak Nuclear Force.
Page 10, Thus the total correction at this energy is … 0.05933 End-quote . .
16.8559670781893 inverse value 0.059326171875 is an extraction of 1.125 .
4 3.18309886183791 (1/pi)*10 quotient = 1.25663706143592 . 1.25663706143592 sqrt = 1.12099824327959 . 1.12099824327959 0.059326171875 inverse value 16.8559670781893 product = 0.06650453445238 . i find it curious when we search out 1/0.0072 being 138.888888888889 notional 138.9
. n.b. the sqrt of 1.125 being 1.06066017177982, times pi/3 = 1.1107207345396
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is July 16th, 2017. 1:48 PM. updated July 20, 2017. 10:30 AM . .
from the numerical outcomes regarding:
Cubes and Cuboids as notional “strings”
the numerical outcome of 0.192 is not easily observed. . .
?? on, Hadronic Transitions ??
https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.58.052004 . Quote: gives B ( Υ ( 2 S ) → Υ ( 1 S ) π + π − ) = 0.192 ± 0.002 ± 0.010. End-quote
.
.
0.192 is an extraction of 1.125 . and the sqrt of 1.125 being 1.06066017177982, times pi/3 = 1.1107207345396 . and 1.1107207345396 * 8 = 8.8857658763167 . and 8.8857658763167 / sqrt 2 = 2pi .
n.b. 1.125/ 0.192 = 5.859375 . .
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is July 12th, 2017. 1:20 PM
further to
Cubes and Cuboids as notional “strings”
at this time i am revisiting some past reconciliations:
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is July 8th, 2017. AM. .
thank you for your Physics lectures 1 to 10, September 20, 2010 through November 30, 2010. .
Stanπford physics lectures, Published on Mar 30, 2011. . .
i am now re-orientating our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula and working my way through an extreme .
amount of data output looking for a uniform way to align packets of energy for particles . .
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is July 4th, 2017. updated July 8, 2017.
change of denotation:
momentum P was denoted as small p and now we will denote P as Q
i have chosen Q for no particular reason but to show we are about to approach our
our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula using possibly three or more
pi-Profiling Perimeters P in unison 1P, 2P, 3P … . .
re: E = M C^2 ( Albert Einstein ) M was denoted as small m .
our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula ( using just one Perimeter P )
now looks like .
[ Qradius bo1P ] is mutual to and in unison to notionally [ Axis xQm bo1Pe5 ] + [ Axis yQm bo1Pe5 ] .
[ diameter D ] / (f1) gives us e1 , (e1) * 2 gives us e5 .
bias offset ( bo ) was a denotation to remind me that we were entering the numerical environment within and .
about our pi-Profiling Perimeter P using/entering a radius R value as our 1P e2 entry value .
and this 1Pe2 entry value, radius R value was extracted from .
our notional Perimeter P “Boosting” or going exponential formula: .
1 - { 1 / [ ( 16 / 16 + n ) ] }
Page ! of !20 37
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is July 2nd, 2017. 11:40 PM. .
today i viewed Lecture 5 and was interested in your remarks: .
1/ at 24:28 Quote: area as fundamental unit End-quote .
2/ at 55: 36 Quote: question is are there indirect tests for string theory? End-quote .
Quote: construct a very very convincing string theory that gives rise to .
the a standard model for exactly in a very computable way End-quote . .
our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula ( Perimeters ( P ) in unison ) .
to numerically connect P^2 with 2m now looks like: .
[ small p radius bo1P ] is mutual to and in unison to notionally [ Axis xm bo1Pe5 ] + [ Axis ym bo1Pe5 ] .
i now have enough pi-Profiling data to move forward, for our trial pi-Loop formula i replaced P with small p .
and at this time we can revert back to P being our momentum .
when you say boost along the z axis, this notion of boosting is what i call .
pre pi-Profiling of our value of interest ( VOI ) to give us a starting point entry value . .
for P greater then sixteen ( 16 ) is entered into the numerical environment within and .
about our pi-Profiling Perimeter by the following pre pi-Profiling Formula . .
1 - { 1 / [ ( 16 / 16 + n ) ] } .
where n may be a decimal an integer or perhaps even a number with both an integer and decimal value .
this pre pi-Profiling formula gives us our entry fraction values of interest ( VOI ) enabling us to observe
[ Axis xm bo1Pe5 ] + [ Axis ym bo1Pe5 ], to be continued. i will now view Lecture 6 after a break . .
Page ! of !21 37
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 29th 2017. updated July 2, 2017 10:32 PM i viewed Lecture 4 today and once again while the mathematics was confusing
. or just beyond my mathematical education experience
. ( n.b. i did manage to get my amateur radio licence VK3VTR )
.
. from lecture 4, i was still able to make connections with your Word Seed of Notions
. and some of your lecture board drawings/expressions/notations
. to my pi-Profiling observations long ago, back in time
. to when i was observing the pi-Profiling behaviour of number outcomes
. pre January 2012 and then further back in time again to numerical pi observation outcomes
. pre December 1996. at that time, pre December 1996, i was considering
. the notion increments of increments about our pi-Profiling Perimeter P
. increments of increments is about the notion of increments of increments being both
. proportional “too” ?? alternando in proportion: Aristotle??
. and in unison with our diameter D and our perimeter P
. after viewing Lectures 5 through 10
. i will try to build this notion of increments of increments into our trial formula:
.
[ small p radius 1P ] is mutual to and in unison to notionally [ Axis xm bo1Pe5 ] + [ Axis ym bo1Pe5 ] . .
my dyslexic mind is saying at this time that perhaps at some point we may have to some how leave .
the notion of Quote: mechanical oscillators End-quote behind .
not forgetting them or replacing our notion of oscillators .
we are perhaps just going strip them back out of the “picture” changing our point of view .
or our numerical point of view or the shifting of our numerical parameter/s .
Page ! of !22 37
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 27th 2017. 4:00 PM .
increments ( units ) for our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula .
[ small p radius 1P ] is mutual to and in unison to notionally [ Axis xm bo1Pe5 ] + [ Axis ym bo1Pe5 ] . .
initially i began to build our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula .
with small p as [sqrt 11]^2 .
then i ignored the notion of 11/27 all together after observing .
that when small p was 16 our [ Axis xm bo1Pe5 was Zero ] and [ Axis ym bo1Pe5 was Zero ] .
i have trialled both positive integer { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 … } .
input for small p: {17, 18 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 … } .
and fractions increments of { 0.75, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625 . . . } .
input for small p: 16.75, 17.5, 18.25 . . . .
input for small p: 16.5, 17, 17.5, 18 . . . .
and so on for 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625 . . . .
the fraction increment increase give more interesting data however there is a point of overlap .
i think an important type of increment observations will be when using our mathematical constants e.g. .
input for small p: 16 + { pi, + pi, + pi, + pi, + pi … } .
Table 1: The three lowest energy eigenvalues for different basis sizes M in Lanczos calculations for a one-dimensional hard-wall box of length 2, using discretization ∆ = 0.01.
End-quote
. pi-Profiling the Word Seed of Notion: Exact*
. ( pi/2 ) / ( 4/pi ) = 1.23370055013617
inverse value 0.810569469138702 .
pi declaration is: 3.14159265358979 last decimal places may be rounding . .
sqrt ( pi^3) / sqrt ( 4/pi ) = 4.93480220054468
inverse value = 0.202642367284676 .
pi declaration is: 3.14159265358979 last decimal places may be rounding . .
so i am confident that for the behaviour of numbers in regard to your remark: .
Quote: .
each time you increase the energy of a spring or string the internal energy .
by one unit it increases the mass squared by one unit .
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 24th 2017. updated 4:09 PM updated June 27, 2017. .
i have made some perhaps curious remarks and i will endeavour to address them for you: .
1/ i have used 16, what is 16 with reference to pi-Profiling? . .
2/ algebra in general is also masked when we are pi-Profiling .
we do work with important numerical ratios of right angle triangles . .
3/ i have said n.b. 0.4074074074074 denoted fPO9_1 is an extraction from positive integer 9 . .
4/ may be connected to the theorem on indices given by Pierre de Fermat in .
Quote: 1637 End-quote and
. Quote: his "Last Theorem" ( Observatio Domini Petri de Fermat ). End-quote
i am still thinking about items 3 and 4 above .
and do remarks items 3 and 4 relate to your boosting Axis z ??
.
. re: 1/ above
giving a pi-Profiling formula positive integer 16 re item 1/above: .
note there are many ways of presenting pi-Profiling outcomes that arrive at 16 .
i will give the pi-Profiling formulas for what i think gives us an overall awareness:
31.0062766802998 pi^3 . 5.56832799683171 sqrt (pi^3) . 2.78416399841585 [ sqrt (pi^3) ] / 2 . . 6.28318530717959 pi*2 2.78416399841585 [ sqrt (pi^3) ] / 2 quotient = 2.25675833419103 . 2.25675833419103 ^2 = 5.09295817894065 [2pi /{[sqrt (pi^3) ]/2}]^2, being pi-Profiling Formula Facilitator f1 . . 3.14159265358979 pi 5.09295817894065 [2pi /{[sqrt (pi^3) ]/2}]^2, being pi-Profiling Formula Facilitator f1 product = 16
re: 2/ above and and 4 times the sqrt pi ( n.b. some pi-Profiling outcomes are pre January 2012 )
. my remarks from: pi-Profiling Concepts ( updated May 2, 2016 )
. Authors notes: February 18th 2016. ( updated May 26, 2016 ) page 21
. Symmetry Warning: Friend or Foe
. My preface to the warning, Symmetry Warning: Friend or Foe is that, my interest is in how
.
numbers behave and with this in mind i make the following remarks: .
Page ! of !26 37
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
when we use the number six, or we have six of anything . >< . .
or when we use √2, √3 and √6 we must be aware that 4 * ( √ pi ) being 7.0898154036221 .
may be written as: {(√pi/3) * (√8)} * [√6] = 4*√pi
. 1.02332670794649 being √ ( pi / 3 ) 2.82842712474619 √8 product = 2.89440501823307 being [ √ ( pi / 3 ] * [ √8 ] . 2.89440501823307 being [ √ ( pi / 3 ] * [ √8 ] 2.44948974278318 being √6 also being ( √2 ) * ( √3 ) product = 7.08981540362206 being 4 * ( √ pi )
.
my concern is in reference to the notion of Hadrons, Mesons (1 quark plus 1 anti-quark) and the . >< . quotients arrived at by division using √2 ,√3 and √6.
. Question: what if Mesons were found to have a physical connection to 4(√pi)?
. Question: could Symmetry at 8(√pi) being 14.1796308072441 and denoted f2 be of a danger to
.
the technicians and or the Nuclear Accelerator?
. >< .
6, √6, (1/pi) and the notion of Quote: C-parameter and coupling constant End-quote .
see symmetry warning Page 17.
Authors notes: February 20th 2016. when we use number six, or we have six of anything containing
. or dividing by number 6
. . >< .
6, √6, ( 1/pi ) and the notion of Quote: C-parameter and coupling constant End-quote. . .
Authors notes: February 20th 2016. Quote: Particle momentum in the Centre of Mass .
Quoting paper: Properties of C-parameters and coupling constant .
Contributions to C-parameter n=2; A; 2.4317 End-quote. .
Ok, i am know going back to October 29th 2002 when i observed the following pi-Profiling .
outcome of : 2.43170840741611 and i posted the pi-Profiling Formula for .
this outcome 2.43170840741611 to my web site at that time.
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
0.607927101854027 [ ( √6 ) * ( 1/pi ) ]^2 4 product = 2.43170840741611 pi-Profiling Formula outcome for 2.43170840741611
Authors notes: February 20th 2016. ( updated March 31, 2016 ) .
Solar constant and the notion of one second.
.
.
My pi-Profiling outcome value for Solar constant and posted to my web site May 6th 2003 was .
1367.0340735 and note, we can rewrite the pi-Profiling Formula for this value 1367.0340735 to .
give a numerical outcome of 9,192,434,085.993 which is a good approximation for the oscillations .
of caesium - 133, used for defining one second or The Second.
Page ! of !28 37
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 24th 2017. 11:51 AM updated June 27, 2017. PM .
we can now write our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula for ( “binding them” ): .
[ small p radius 1P ] is mutual to and in unison to 4 / [ our biased offset Perimeter bo1P ] .
conversely .
[ small p radius 1P ] is mutual to and in unison to [ our biased offset Perimeter bo1P / 8 ] .
noting that [ our biased offset Perimeter bo1P / 8 ] is our .
pi-Profiling Environment Formula Facilitator bo1Pe5 .
our pi-Profiling Formula e5 is ( e1 ) * 2 gives us e5 .
we can now write our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula notionally as: .
[ small p radius 1P ] is mutual to and in unison to notionally [ Axis xm bo1Pe5 ] + [ Axis ym bo1Pe5 ]
i will now revisit Lecture 1 and 2: String Theory and M- Theory
given thought to, what could “boosting down the Z axis: be? re: .
1:11:52 Quote: each time you increase the energy of a spring or string the internal energy .
by one unit it increases the mass squared by one unit End-quote . .
Page ! of !29 37
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 21st 2017. updated July 4, 2017. PM .
having viewed Lecture 3 many times and while the application mathematical notions used are .
somewhat confusing to me many of your Word Seeds of Notions have had some resonance for me .
firstly .
at 6:27 re: Quote: sum of squares a^2 + b^2 End-quote .
algebra in general is also masked when we are pi-Profiling .
we do work with important numerical ratios of right angle triangles . .
secondly .
at 44:53 re: string at rest M naught squared ( M0 )^2 .
at 46:37 re: Quote: EGS ” to “ M naught squared End-quote .
Quote: a dagger one gives us, one extra unit of energy End-quote .
Quote: Energy = what ever naught squared is + one End-quote .
at 56:04 re: Quote: you must realise quote we have come to a disaster End-quote Quote: M naught squared plus one = zero End-quote
. Quote: ( re the notion of tachyons ) negative mass squared is a bad thing End-quote
.
. for me a ( negative mass squared ) may be considered
. as a pi-Profiling Environment Facilitator ( e ) value
. ( negative mass squared ) may be considered as our e2 value
. ( negative mass squared )^2 may be considered as our e1 value
. [ ( negative mass squared )^2 being our e1 value ] * f1 gives us our diameter D
.
where pi-Profiling Formula Facilitator f1 is 16/pi . .
before i move on, for the above remarks our value 1Pe2 in unison with 2Pe2 .
and the notion of tachyons would be interesting to follow up within an about our perimeter P . .
from my trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula i have observed .
a behaviour of numerators when a denominator of 16 .
gives us a starting null value of >16 which may be useful .
if at some time we need to give our notional small p value a decimal part . .
so my trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula using two pi-Profiling Perimeters 1P and bo1P .
now looks like: ( sqrt { [ ( p = 2, p = 3, p = 4, p = 5, p = 6 . . . )^{ 4, 5, 6 . . . ) ] ) / ( [ ( p = 2, p = 3, p = 4, p = 5, p = 6 . . . )^{ 4, 5, 6 . . . ) ] -16 ) }
.
is our pi-Profiling Perimeter (1P) radius 1R .
and .
( sqrt { [ ( p = 2, p = 3, p = 4, p = 5, p = 6 . . . )^{ 4, 5, 6, . . . ) ] ) / [ ( p = 2, p = 3, p = 4, p = 5, p = 6, p = 7 . . . )^{ 4, 5, 6, 7 . . . ) ] -16 } is mutual to and in unison with
.
Page ! of !30 37
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
4 / [ our biased offset Perimeter bo1P ] .
by the pi-Profiling Formula: .
4.9090909090909 .
divided by .
[ ( sqrt { [ ( p = 2, p = 3, p = 4 . . . )^{ 4, 5, 6, . . . ) ] ) / [ ( p = 2, p = 3, p = 4 . . . )^{ 4, 5, 6, 7 . . . ) ] -16 } ] * fPO9_3 .
where .
4.9090909090909 denoted fPO9_2 is fPO9_3 / ( pi/2 )
and fPO9_3 is [2 / 0.4074074074074] * pi/2 .
0.4074074074074 fPO9_1 being an extraction from positive integer 9 ( PO9 ) .
( pi-Profiling for fPO9 to be given as a separate issue ) . .
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 20th 2017. updated June 27, 2017. .
i have changed my trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula using two pi-Profiling Perimeters 1P and bo1P .
re: your remark Lecture 2, 1:13:40 Quote: two co-ordinates x and y End-quote . .
now our formula looks like: .
1P: #p ( 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 … )^{ 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 . . . ) mutual to or in unison with bo1P: # ( xm even + ym even ) .
now i will think about parameters of scale.
the notion of boundaries is interesting .
our fundamental boundary for the area A of a Perimeter P is P itself .
( xm even + ym even ) may very well be our companion diameter Dc and .
xm even and ym even may be our companion radius Rc .
at 90 degrees to each other .
for me .
we cannot imply that a numerical outcome is touching or resting on .
our pi-Profiling Perimeter P and add .
that our pi-Profiling Perimeter P is notionally the cross-section of its companion Sphere S
Page ! of !31 37
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 19th 2017. updated June 27, 2017. .
i have used the symbol # to let you and other readers know .
at this time we are we are working with integers .
and our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula for .
our expression ( #p^2 )^n>1 .
where small p is the [sqrt 11]^2 .
n.b. we will assign integers for small p later .
and for our expression #m/2 .
m is 27/2 . .
i have denoted the pi-Profiling Constant Formula Facilitator 7.71118196790222 as fPO9_3 .
to alert you and other readers that i am trying to pi-Profile your Word Seeds of Notion given .
during Lecture 1 and 2: String Theory and M- Theory given by yourself. . .
i also have observed a pi-Profiling Constant Formula Facilitator value denoted fMeson .
and .
a pi-Profiling Constant Formula Facilitator value denoted fQuark . .
my trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula for our expression ( #p^2 )^n>1 .
where small p is the [sqrt 11]^2 .
n.b. we will assign integers for p later .
and for our expression #m/2 .
when m is 27/2 .
we observe some interesting results .
which has once again made it necessary for me to hold of .
a presentation of the pi-Profiling outcomes for the moment . .
from my data i am observing the behaviour of .
Quote: strings End-quote .
may be connected to the theorem on indices given by Pierre de Fermat in .
Quote: 1637 End-quote .
and .
Quote: his "Last Theorem" ( Observatio Domini Petri de Fermat ). End-quote . .
Page ! of !32 37
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 16th 2017. updated June 27, 2017. .
for the trial pi-Profiling outcomes given at June 1st 2017 this paper and updated June 8, 2017. PM .
denotation for the trial pi-Profiling input values of interest ( VOI ) 11/27 are: .
for our expression ( #p^2 )^n>1 .
small p is [sqrt 11]^2 .
n.b. we will assign integers for small p later .
for our expression #m/2 .
m is 27/2 .
for our pi-Profiling environment 1P, our VOI is small p being the (sqrt 11)^2 .
and 1P is mutual to or in unison with pi-Profiling environment bo1P .
for our pi-Profiling environment bo1P, our VOI is m being 27/2 .
when we are using pi-Profiling concepts .
the notions trigonometry and unit-circle are masked from us and .
pi-Profiling outcomes do not imply status or units we do that. i am now up to Lecture 3. . .
Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 15th 2017. updated June 16, 2017. .
over the last few days i have begun to build a .
pi-Profiling Loop Formula using Perimeters P in unison .
to numerically connect P^2 with 2m, at this time i have given the P^2 the expression #small p^2
.
and 2m the expression #m/2 .
we want to be able increase P^2 exponentially ( “Boost it ) .
hence ( #small p^2 )^n>1 .
i suspect that our Speed of Light value Cn maybe masked in the value 2 .
hence #m/2 .
i am now looking for pi-Profiling Perimeters P in unison .
that can be firstly pi-looped and then re-orientate to satisfy ( “Bind them” ) .
( #small p^2 )^n>1 mutual to #m/2 .
the notion of P^2 and 2m being considered as numerator and denominator has been .
striped away hopefully allowing us to further define the notion “open and closed strings”. . .
.
.
Page ! of !33 37
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
Abstract began this paper June 1st, 2017. updated June 27, 2017.
.
for me, Leonard Susskind has striped back the formulas for many notions of Physics .
and mathematics i will now endeavour to strip back our pi-Profiling formula concepts .
hopefully to help with the understanding of: .
firstly (1) .
Quote: Quantum Mechanical oscillator: Integer Multiple of Something. End-quote .
secondly (2) .
Quote: [ P^2 / 2m ] and the notion of an additive constant B independent to P .
( being a state of motion ) End-quote .
thirdly (3) .
to co-join numerical outcomes observed from pi-Profiling .
to possibilities of Particle Physics and Science in general. .
This paper is a work in progress .
as i try and relate pi-Profiling Concepts to the Word Seeds of Notion for .
Particle Physics, necessitating the update of this paper. . .
Page ! of !34 37
Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.
Today is June 1st 2017. updated June 8, 2017. PM .
Once again i have had to stop what i am pi-Profiling and i have begun to pi-Profile the notion of " String Theory "
. ? are we basing the notion of string theory on the notion of quotient ?
. i am observing two pi-Profiling Perimeters in unison with
a bias offset ( bo ) .
we are working on our perimeter P .
and in particular with what i have called a bias offset pi-Profiling Perimeters ( boP ) in unison
.
. when we divide 11 / 27
and positive integer fractions of a similar theme .
both the numerator and denominator may be considered as surface areas .
i am now preparing pi-Profiling formulas hopefully to assist you and myself to understand your notion of "string theories"