[P2] LED vs_Fluorescent

LED vs. Fluorescent Commercial Lighting: Should I Upgrade

Today?

By: Precision Paragon [P2]

Introduction

© 2013 Precision Paragon [P2]

• LED lighting is awesome, and it’s getting better and better with each passing month. In fact, if you’re familiar with Haitz’s law, you know it states that LED will improve in efficiency and go down in cost over time.

• Building owners are left wondering: If energy-efficient lighting is going to be even more energy-efficient tomorrow than it is today, is it better to wait for those advances to upgrade your lighting, or upgrade your lighting using the technology available today?

Some Hypothetical Numbers

Here comes the math! Lets use round numbers to make this easier. Hypothesize a warehouse with 1,000 400-watt Metal halide fixtures. Below are some “Before and After” shots of a warehouse retrofitted with [P2] fixtures.

© 2013 Precision Paragon [P2]

Average Cost Per Month – Metal Halide

At an average cost of 0.09 cents per kilowatt, a system of 1,000 400-watt Metal Halide fixtures costs $41.22 per hour

(If you’re confused by the math, it helps to know that a 400-watt Metal Halide fixture actually consumes about 458-watts)

If the fixtures are on an average of 730 hours every month (730 x $41.22), it ends up costing $30,090.60 every month to light the warehouse

© 2013 Precision Paragon [P2]

Hypothetical Retrofit

© 2013 Precision Paragon [P2]

Let’s look at two options for our retrofit:

One is an energy- efficient 4-Lamp T5-HO fluorescent fixture,The other is the new [P2] QHC LED high bay.

When replacing a 400-watt Metal Halide, they both cut energy consumption significantly.

© 2013 Precision Paragon [P2]

How Much Are We Saving?

These are the numbers based on 5 years of savings after retrofitting:

Initially, Fluorescent Is Still Cheaper

© 2013 Precision Paragon [P2]

What this chart doesn’t tell you is whether fluorescent or LED will be a better option for your retrofit.

Right now, your initial costs will be significantly lower with fluorescent, but there are other factors that could make either technology the best solution for a given application.

What this chart does show is that if you’re sitting around waiting for new technology to show up before taking on a lighting retrofit, you’re wasting quite a bit of money.

Based On a Recent Survey We Completed: 68% of Businesses Will Choose High Bay or Linear Fluorescent -

© 2013 Precision Paragon [P2]

We're saving American businesses money year after year by making lighting that reduces energy costs and improves lighting quality. It's something that businesses know and will continue to want. [P2] has a plan to be there, giving our customers the fixtures they need to deliver cost savings and lighting improvements.

© 2013 Precision Paragon [P2]

Both Options Save Money

Contact Information

[P2] West

23281 La Palma Ave.Yorba Linda, CA 92887Tel: (714) 386-5550Fax: (714) 386-5649

[P2] Midwest

623 Brakke Dr.Hudson, WI 54016Tel: (715) 381-2971Fax: (715) 381-5597

[P2] East

317 NE 35th Ave.Gainesville, FL 32609Tel: (352) 692-5900Fax: (352) 692-5901

Precision Paragon [P2]

www.p-2.com

© 2013 Precision Paragon [P2]

© 2013 Precision Paragon [P2]